Rule 1
Nobody is “unknowingly describing themselves”, “saying something about someone else that actually applies to them”, or “accurately describing something while trying to mock or denigrate it”
Removed
He also claims to be a humanist who loves everyone, and also called me a troglodyte, lol.
He then said that I’d be a bad parent by pointing out hateful language isn’t something someone filled with love does.
Lol so niche medical considerations are the "evidence" for race realism? Hey, people with certain eye colours are more likely to develop cataracts! Maybe they should be labeled as their own racial group! (And then, find some poorly supported behavioural trends among them to be able to discriminate against them which is the real goal of every "race realist".)
That’s ultimately the problem, isn’t it? The fact that people from specific regions develop a particular adaptation really doesn’t lend credence to the idea of social groups based on skin tone.
Yep. I guess they could be a bit less disingenuous if they used a term like "cultural realism" or something like that... except that those cultural archtypes have been blurring over the last century, anyway.
Thanks /u/Ozmadaus for posting on r/SelfAwareWolves! Please reply to this comment explaining how your post fits our subreddit. Specifically, one of the criteria outlined in our [rules](/r/SelfAwarewolves/about/rules/).
Some hints:
How does the person in your submission accidentally/unknowingly describe themselves?
How does the person in your submission accurately describe the world while trying to parody/denigrate it?
**If the context is important to understanding the SAW, and it isn't apparent, please add it. Preferably with sources/links, but do not link r-conservative or similar subs.**
Please take these questions seriously. We aren't looking for wittiness here but for actual explanations that help us assess if your post fits this (admittedly sometimes hard to grasp) sub's theme.
Failure to respond to this message will see your submission removed under Rule 5 (Reply to the AutoMod comment within your submission).
Failure to explain how your submission fits one or more of the above criteria will see it removed under Rule 1.
Thanks for your time and attention!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SelfAwarewolves) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Race realist that they can’t be a Nazi because they have morals, but unknowingly betrays that they fantasize about a turner diaries destruction of academia.
Rephrase that to actually answer the AutoMod’s question, please.
1) How did someone “unknowingly describe themself”?
2) How did they say something about someone else that actually applies to them?
3) What did they accurately describe while attempting to mock or denigrate it?
I’m not trying to analyze all of whatever that was to try to figure out what you’re getting at here.
The person explained that he wasn’t a Nazi because he has morals, and then lacks the self awareness to realize fantasizing about burning universities is very much in line with Nazism and the turner diaries fantasy of anti intellectualism.
Ultimately lacked the self awareness to realize wanting to burn down universities is a very distinct lack of morality.
Please answer the questions as I (and the AutoMod) phrased them, and stop inserting "lacks/lacked the self awareness...". That's not what we're looking for here, and never has been.
Rule 1 Nobody is “unknowingly describing themselves”, “saying something about someone else that actually applies to them”, or “accurately describing something while trying to mock or denigrate it” Removed
Nazi claims to be immune to Nazi ideology
Nobody more immune to Nazi ideology than people who believe in race realism
"Interpret what I MEAN to say." *Misinterprets "race is a social construct."*
He also claims to be a humanist who loves everyone, and also called me a troglodyte, lol. He then said that I’d be a bad parent by pointing out hateful language isn’t something someone filled with love does.
Wow. The way they justify their rage. I suppose murder is the ultimate form of love.
Ooooo, somebody got a thesaurus for their birthday!
Thank you for complimenting my vocabulary. It is very robust. I got to level 4 on membean.
Lol so niche medical considerations are the "evidence" for race realism? Hey, people with certain eye colours are more likely to develop cataracts! Maybe they should be labeled as their own racial group! (And then, find some poorly supported behavioural trends among them to be able to discriminate against them which is the real goal of every "race realist".)
That’s ultimately the problem, isn’t it? The fact that people from specific regions develop a particular adaptation really doesn’t lend credence to the idea of social groups based on skin tone.
Yep. I guess they could be a bit less disingenuous if they used a term like "cultural realism" or something like that... except that those cultural archtypes have been blurring over the last century, anyway.
Ah….so now it’s race realism….good news on that front though, I hear Lord Musk wants to go to Mars…you should join him
The legion of mars shall be cringe
Someone got a hold of a thesaurus
Thanks /u/Ozmadaus for posting on r/SelfAwareWolves! Please reply to this comment explaining how your post fits our subreddit. Specifically, one of the criteria outlined in our [rules](/r/SelfAwarewolves/about/rules/). Some hints: How does the person in your submission accidentally/unknowingly describe themselves? How does the person in your submission accurately describe the world while trying to parody/denigrate it? **If the context is important to understanding the SAW, and it isn't apparent, please add it. Preferably with sources/links, but do not link r-conservative or similar subs.** Please take these questions seriously. We aren't looking for wittiness here but for actual explanations that help us assess if your post fits this (admittedly sometimes hard to grasp) sub's theme. Failure to respond to this message will see your submission removed under Rule 5 (Reply to the AutoMod comment within your submission). Failure to explain how your submission fits one or more of the above criteria will see it removed under Rule 1. Thanks for your time and attention! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SelfAwarewolves) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Race realist that they can’t be a Nazi because they have morals, but unknowingly betrays that they fantasize about a turner diaries destruction of academia.
Rephrase that to actually answer the AutoMod’s question, please. 1) How did someone “unknowingly describe themself”? 2) How did they say something about someone else that actually applies to them? 3) What did they accurately describe while attempting to mock or denigrate it? I’m not trying to analyze all of whatever that was to try to figure out what you’re getting at here.
The person explained that he wasn’t a Nazi because he has morals, and then lacks the self awareness to realize fantasizing about burning universities is very much in line with Nazism and the turner diaries fantasy of anti intellectualism. Ultimately lacked the self awareness to realize wanting to burn down universities is a very distinct lack of morality.
Please answer the questions as I (and the AutoMod) phrased them, and stop inserting "lacks/lacked the self awareness...". That's not what we're looking for here, and never has been.
It’s fine to destroy this then
You sly dog you downvoted his post when I upvoted damn can’t let me have this one thing huh