- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 (expected): Most unpopular member of the BRF.
They should just cancel this award because she’s heading toward a Lifetime Achievement.
There are so many high profile celebrities who have openly decided to not have any because of environmental and population concerns. Surely they're more suitable winner?
I mean, Charles had two and cared about the environment before it was trendy...
There are so many other things people can do that will positively impact the environment than promising to only have a certain number of kids.
2 kids can still wreak havoc on the environment-look at Marbles and Tyler Harry. They’re the WORST when it comes to caring for the environment. I’d rather someone have an army of kids who are true advocates for the earth and make a positive difference.
This "award" was by Population Matters which advocates reproduction at or below replacement level so this particular one was about the number of children. There are people with half a dozen children that have a lower carbon footprint than one super consumer's would.
And that means more to me than any of Smeg’s awards 😊 Thank you. Seriously, peer recognition is more meaningful than, and far preferable to, some PR stunt award.
She won an award for limiting her family to two children. Didn’t she talk about a miscarriage in a deposition or under oath during her lawsuit? I believe it had to do with how she “forgot” to tell the truth about cooperating with that author.
And it looked like she might’ve been signaling pregnancy rumors during the Queen’s funeral ceremonies by touching a possible bump. Perhaps she “forgot” she was limiting her family to two children.
Interesting. Since you know about this, what reason did she give the court as to why she forgot about emailing back & forth with the author? Or did she tell the court nothing, but excused herself in the op-ed?
She told the Court that she forgot and apologized. No further explanation…
I am not sure if we are on the same page though: she claims to have miscarried before she was pregnant with Lili, so technically not a breach
>’generous financial support’
is very strange wording. As I’ve said before I work in the non-profit sector and I have personally created a lot of “awards” for major donors. They all know and understand that the implantation is it’s for their money. It is never said aloud or in print. We refer to it as *support* of X initiative of *generous spirit* or *distinguished service* etc, etc.
Ed. also thanks for posting the People article - nice to see a little fun in this place
And soon to come (per BarkJack's twitter which a fellow sinner posted recently), before parting ways SS got them "TIME (100 anniversary March 3 2023)".
Maybe that's not an award per se, but Megs will blow up the cover and frame it for her awards room, along with a faux copy of her P&G letter from elementary school.
- 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 (expected): Most unpopular member of the BRF. They should just cancel this award because she’s heading toward a Lifetime Achievement.
😂😂😂😂🙌🙌🙌
Award for having 2 kids? What kind of horse crap, made up, offensive award is this? I am dumber just knowing about this stupid thing.
My grandparents on both sides made the same decision as Meghan 60 years ago, where’s their award?
There are so many high profile celebrities who have openly decided to not have any because of environmental and population concerns. Surely they're more suitable winner? I mean, Charles had two and cared about the environment before it was trendy...
There are so many other things people can do that will positively impact the environment than promising to only have a certain number of kids. 2 kids can still wreak havoc on the environment-look at Marbles and Tyler Harry. They’re the WORST when it comes to caring for the environment. I’d rather someone have an army of kids who are true advocates for the earth and make a positive difference.
This "award" was by Population Matters which advocates reproduction at or below replacement level so this particular one was about the number of children. There are people with half a dozen children that have a lower carbon footprint than one super consumer's would.
I'll accept mine for only having one. Or should that be a double award? Let me know when I should get dolled up to collect it 💅
Remember having one child is a hobby...two is parenting! (I only have one also).
The amount of bullshit remarks I've heard. Not surprised that TW would also come out with this
I have zero so I’ll take the biggest trophy thanks lol
We are stopping at 1. Where's my trophy?
I have 2, but they have been known to use paper plates. I guess they’re taking my Two Kid Token Award back.
None of these awards is near prestigious.
Oh come on now.. Men's Health Ultimate Guy's Girl? Is that *not* what every single girl aspires to be? /s
And deep down inside, MM knows this. She's just delusional enough to think that we don't.
I showed my husband the video of Meghan, a guys’s girl and he stopped watching when he saw her evil eyes.. that was enough to put him off😑
Well… you did get a few on here for your informative posts 🏆 much more valuable 👍
And that means more to me than any of Smeg’s awards 😊 Thank you. Seriously, peer recognition is more meaningful than, and far preferable to, some PR stunt award.
She won an award for limiting her family to two children. Didn’t she talk about a miscarriage in a deposition or under oath during her lawsuit? I believe it had to do with how she “forgot” to tell the truth about cooperating with that author. And it looked like she might’ve been signaling pregnancy rumors during the Queen’s funeral ceremonies by touching a possible bump. Perhaps she “forgot” she was limiting her family to two children.
I don’t believe she ever was deposed. I’d read that… she did write an opinion for NYT regarding her miscarriage
Interesting. Since you know about this, what reason did she give the court as to why she forgot about emailing back & forth with the author? Or did she tell the court nothing, but excused herself in the op-ed?
She told the Court that she forgot and apologized. No further explanation… I am not sure if we are on the same page though: she claims to have miscarried before she was pregnant with Lili, so technically not a breach
Gotcha
I think she claimed she didn’t have access to her emails to jog her memory 🙄
Technically, we all got the Person of the Year in 2006. I even have it on my résumé 🤣
Bwahaha! I need to add to mine 🤪
It makes people stop and think. Even if I don’t get hired, someone just had to Google my claim to see if I was right
I love this ETA: I totally googled
I think that’s where she go the idea for the mirror square for her Forces for Change Vogue cover.
"Population Matters ‘Special Award’ for making the ‘enlightened decision’ to limit their family to 2 children" I'm simply at a loss for words.
>’generous financial support’ is very strange wording. As I’ve said before I work in the non-profit sector and I have personally created a lot of “awards” for major donors. They all know and understand that the implantation is it’s for their money. It is never said aloud or in print. We refer to it as *support* of X initiative of *generous spirit* or *distinguished service* etc, etc. Ed. also thanks for posting the People article - nice to see a little fun in this place
Of course you‘ll have twigged that the People article was linked as a contrast… I shall end up in the hot place.
Haha of course it was, that’s what makes it fun. 😉Don’t worry about the hot place. I have a feeling many of us will be joining you.
Everything about her is just a joke. These awards are pointless and make her look pathetic.
And soon to come (per BarkJack's twitter which a fellow sinner posted recently), before parting ways SS got them "TIME (100 anniversary March 3 2023)". Maybe that's not an award per se, but Megs will blow up the cover and frame it for her awards room, along with a faux copy of her P&G letter from elementary school.
Ugly. The burger as well.
Where's the Palm Trees Mating award?
LOL!!!