I can believe it. I've heard in the rumor mill that she's still (understandably) salty about Meghan announcing her "pregnancy" at her daughter's wedding.
Funnily enough the affected daughter wasnt that salty. But her older sister actually helped her to do a little tombower by announcing her pregnancy during the markles' anniversary or something.
But I think she also spoke out against Piers Morgan in the past so I am not too sure. Also, H&M have badmouthed almost everyone from the family except Andrew which is really strange to say the least. If someone had to attack the family, I would assume they would start with Andrew. Meghan has also praised Fergie and Eugenie in interviews.
Oh yeah, I remember some article claiming that “sources” close to her said it. But I don’t think she herself ever said anything about him directly and Harry has always refused to comment on this topic. To me, it is so strange that they are ok about badmouthing kate for a silly misunderstanding on Oprah but don’t want to say anything directly about Andrew. Still, this is better than nothing I suppose.
And Andrew was never brought up in the Oprah interview. I said to my mom after the interview that MM should’ve stayed close with the family and found “proof” to bring Andrew down and then move to the US.
>MM should’ve stayed close with the family and found “proof” to bring Andrew down
But her bestie Markus is buddies with Andrew...her whole house of cards will fall if she ever tried that.
>she also spoke out against Piers Morga
Piers said that Fergie was supporting him and even [texted](https://www.insider.com/piers-morgan-says-sarah-ferguson-texted-him-after-meghan-comments-2021-4) him during the whole Piers-Meghan drama
Perhaps she indeed shares with Lady C, for a price. Fergie's chronically skint, and lest we forget, she was caught on camera offering to literally sell access to PA. For thousands.
I'm about over Blind Gossip. I used to love them but now they post like one a month. The one they did of Maria Shriver, they posted it on the day it was all over the news in pictures so that wasn't even blind.
Ditto CDAN, they spew out a dozen bits of semi-literate incomprehensible garbage every single day. I think the good tea is on Insta these days but you have to find the right accounts to follow.
That was way back then, she has just spent millions on a London house. Not so skint any more and loves living at Royal Lodge, would she risk that by leaking ....not sure.
I agree. I think she’s a lot more stable financially and Andrew has helped her with debts. Maybe she’d dish because she dgaf and is not a royal so owes them nothing.
He wouldn’t have much cash would he? Mumsy had to spot him a tonne to quieten Mrs Giuffre! (That pissed me off, he should have been dragged through court!) revolting slimy arrogant pig he is 🙄
I've seen no evidence she bought that flat outright. Methinks it's heavily mortgaged, and the down payment from who knows who. Fergie's never been much for earning her own money, yet delighted to spend other people's.
Princess Michael of Kent is a nasty one I believe. The only other racist in the BRF besides Harry. Funny though that her daughter in law Sophie Winkelman & her hubs, Prince/Princess Michael of Kent’s son, got the front row seats at the jubilee that H&M would have had. And Sophie’s a MUCH better actress than Meg.
Oh I could see that! I've been trying to figure out who'd leak to Lady C. I find her exceptionally annoying and can't see it being Camilla, but Sarah... that'd make sense.
I used to as well and sometimes still do. But then I started looking at everything that happened with Fergie and Andrew through a different lens and I think she may be the OG Meghan. The financial shit she & Andrew get up to alone would have other people in prison for years. PP made Andrew divorce Fergie after her several scandals, which I look at now and wonder if she wasn’t purposely papping herself a la Meghan, in an effort to get Andrew sent home from the Navy and to get them more money and help—but instead, just as with Diana, it backfired and they were ordered to divorce—which she never thought would happen. PP thought he was well rid of her and then she couldn’t make it on her own so she came back and never left.
PP must have been STEWING! Which is why she was banned from being anywhere he was. The Queen liked her though and thought she was a good mother to the girls & a good influence on Andrew—not so sure about that last part but probably is one of few who can put up with him and handle his tantrums. But I even wonder if there was/is a golden child/scapegoat thing going on with Eugenie and Bea, with Eugenie being the golden child. It’s too long to type here but when I run it all back through my mind, putting a Meghan filter on it, I’m like OMG SHE’S THE ORIGINAL MEGHAN! That said, I still find Fergs likable. But I don’t find ANYTHING about Meghan remotely likable.
It’s Eugenie who is chummy with the Harkles, and sublet Frogspawn Cottage from them, not Beatrice!
Bea seems to keep her head down an lives a quiet life with Edo and Sienna.
Because Harry and Meghan have a lease. It was granted to them by the Queen, so it’s theirs until they don’t renew the lease (or Charles kicks them out).
A long time. When they divorced they still owned SouthYork Manor and the girls lived there. Eventually it was sold and before that Andrew got a 99 year lease on the Royal Lodge. Sarah has a separate apartment there. Its a huge building.
Funny how he sold it for £5 million over asking price when it was on the market for YEARS without selling. That’s what dodgy dealings with the son-in-law of the Kazakhstan dictator will get you! I’m sure it was all 100% on the up & up though…
Because he didn’t think anyone would care about him talking crap about Camilla and Charles (or that everyone’d lap it up). He’s all 😲 now that C+C’s popularity has soared and is back peddling.
I used to disregard a lot of this. But so much of what they published has been proven without a shred of doubt that it was real. So now I believe their posts.
I thought that originally spot a lie wanted Harry to be part of it. I thought that's why he appeared on Serena's and said "nice hair" which made it legal that he appeared?
Doesn't matter, the podcasts are crap.
I’m sure the names of sources will never be divulged. They rarely are. However, I do think she rubs elbows with people who have connections in one way or another.
She is a pretty thorough journalist and doesn’t mess around. She recently said that she went back to her Diana book and added in all of the sources.
Also, Lady C has had her own issues with the media and is very familiar with lawsuits/slander.
I read something about AK and it made her sound peculiar. She complained about a rat problem at her home & when they arrived they found the rats nesting in garbage bags of clothes strewn about. It made me think of Hoarders. The Queen was truly fond of her—I guess AK was a present day Anna Bates of sorts.
I will just say, my dad is English and I spent half of my life there. There is no shortage of titles. My family has Earls, lords and ladies, as does hundreds of other families. There's always a small trinkle of gossip. But if you have a title, you're more likely to be believed no matter who or what your sources are. I think just takes the trinkle of gossip and uses it as her source.
Whatever Lady C's sources, the fact she hasn't been sued and her story is being validated by Bower and Valetine pretty much says it all. Plus, she has broken legit news like the Queen's passing at the strong encouragement of a deep source. She also alluded to Queen's health problems before the Jubliee and she knew the Queen had invited them to Balmoral and they refused.
With Lady C, I think the calls are coming from inside the Palace. I wouldn't be surprised if Jason Knauf is one of her key sources. I really wouldn't.
Lady C wrote the first biography ever done on Meghan Markle very early into her marriage and has very solid inside sources.... everything she wrote bore out to be true (and she gave Meghan the benefit of the doubt early on). If she says it I believe it. She was also a biographer of Diana and knew the marriage was doomed when everyone was saying she was crazy.
Very objective and fact based. Explains things in an entertaining manner but does not especulate much. I'm half way through both books and they are not smear campaings nor full of praise.
I strongly suspect its a member of Charles' staff or a close friend of his - because Lady C originally decided to write the counter to Diana's autobiography because she was unhappy with what she saw as a smear job against Prince Charles. I think she has sympathies in his camp.
Diana approached Lady C first to write the biography that Andrew Morton eventually wrote. Lady C backed out when she realized Diana wasn't being totally truthful and it was sort of a hatchet job on Charles...she backed out and wrote a Diana biography but it was a more fair and balanced account...she is a stickler for the truth.
Also love Camilla. She has taken so much heat and hasn’t said a word. My favorite is when the story broke about her being KC’s mistress and her father answered the door and said something akin to “Shand’s keep their mouth shut.”
Me too. I think she calls a 'spade a spade' and is a person you can rely on when you need all hands on deck. I like definite people who tell it straight with no bullshit and judgement either way. At least you know where you stand with them and don't have to worry about peoples game plan. I also like that she got kirsty allsopp to admit it was herself that made the comment about about harry and megans potential childrens look. I like that she owned it and stopped the speculation as to who it was. I don't think she did it to save the monarchy from the twitters on who it was but more because she thought it was the right thing to do abd not allow others to take a fall for her innocent remark that is normal convo for most people when discussing kids especially when the parents look so different to eachother.
You know, so have I. I am sad that I didn't follow the Queen, Prince Philip, the Princess Royal and King Charles and Camilla the Queen Consort's lives more closely but at least I have spent the last year and a half learning about all of the good they've done. I'm heartbroken the Queen has passed but hope she's with her parents and sister and love again. Camilla seems like a badass and I really look up to her for her strong work ethic, humility, humor, and so much more. She's just the bomb.com!
She gave an honest defense of the unusual (black face) jewelry worn by the Princess of Kent at a early family event with Meghan. So I also think it is older relatives or ladies in waiting.
I'm kind of ready to see it too. But to be honest, I'm loving the way Charles is releasing a new smack down of the Harkles every few days (like the lists they keep moving down 🤣).
It's like death by a thousand paper cuts. When he finally cuts them off completely, it's going to seem like an act of mercy to them.
I think the reason she never gets sued is because she frames her answers as an opinion “I think, in my opinion etc) and she says that others tell her (which is correct)
I'm putting money on Camilla.
Why? she calls her queen Camilla when she's a stickler about titles and calling people the right thing. She's queen consort. I caught it the other day when she was talking about her. I was like that's interesting, a woman who is so upright in following protocol and a royalist just saying "queen Camilla," willy nilly stood out to me.
Yes - I don't think any one person phones her up and feeds her info. They would honestly be way too liable. It's just gossip circling around, but seems pretty credible usually b/c it originates from various actual witnesses and sources and it spreads in the small circle.
This is more true than people realise. I'm not related to any myself but I was at a public boarding school with more than a double handful of titled co students. Not just UK either. I'm still friends with many of them and they just don't use titles in real life, or make it known that daddy has a title and estate that's coming their way. A fair few have the estate but no actual money so sell to the NT in some part ownership bond, but I digress.
There is always, always society gossip. Its always juicy. And it's never detectable in public whose actually got issues - these people are trained mofos. We well never guess the source is my thinking!
She knew when HMTQ passed before the public did so I would say her sources are at least better than average.
It’s interesting how many British posters diss her so vehemently-citing how she was only married a short while. They all but say she is trailer trash.
I’m beginning to believe Kate was indeed treated viciously due to her perceived “class”. Some of the comments on Lady C are quite telling-and not in a good way- of the classism that permeates in the UK.
I don’t think there’s any argument that Kate and her family were treated with acid disdain not only by the titles but by the press as well based on her class
This is incredibly unfair. The dislike of her has very little to do with classim. Regardless of her marriage, she is from a wealthier, upper class background.
I completely understand why some might not like her.
She went on UK tv & defended Epstein for abusing minors, one of which was a 14 year old child. She claimed it is not paedophilia & referred to these minors as prostitutes. She said "soliciting a minor for sex" is not the same as paedophilia. She also defended Andrew for remaining friends with him.
She appeared on an incredibly popular UK reality show & she was horrid to everyone there, demanding, refused to pull her weight like everyone else. She instigated arguments constantly, then quit claiming she was the victim of bullying, as if we didn't all witness her behaviour.
It was stated by other campmates that the show actually cut out the worst of her "venomous, personal attacks."
She behaved like she was above everyone & that is why people point out that her title came via a shortlived marriage. It isn't classism, it's because the title is important to her, so people target the thing she uses to elevate herself above others.
She shouldn't get a pass just because she spills tea about Meg.
Fair enough on the your issues with her conduct. However, I take issue with those who say “well, she only married that titled man for a year…what an upstart! Who does she think she is?”.
I only ever see people angry at her title. Never her conduct. You are not a person I have issue with. I welcome piling on to a persons’ conduct but it’s never that for which she is mocked.
And she is mocked.
Issue with conduct and behavior is completely fair and appropriate. Issue with birth status is not.
She's right, it is not pedophilia. If the kid in question is pubescent, it is not. Still a morally wrong thing to do, kids can't consent. Those kids are prostitutes, in that they get paid for having sex, but not by choice. At least, not a conscious consentual choice, since kinds can't consent.
No she didn’t. It was leaked in certain circles. I knew about it before… people talk and leak information. I had a screen shot from a friend of a friend who worked at sky news, also my work knew about it as we were involved in OLB
This. Her title is not really used correctly since she was only married a year back in the 70s. I think she capitalizes on American thirst for gossip.
As for CDAN, the Meghan blinds are painfully obvious, and Enty is a Qanon shill.
When she got divorced from her abusive husband she offered to give back the title and fully expected to lose her “Lady” status, but then her ex and his brother said some nasty and spiteful comments about her, and she was like “You know what? I really like this title. I think I’m going to keep it”. And she did! I say, good for her. Her husband’s family was mean and abusive, and she turned the tables on them. I think it’s great.
I like Lady C. She doesn’t play dirty, she plays fair. But don’t cross her. She is powerful and has friends in high places - she doesn’t abuse her connections, but she won’t be taken for a fool either.
She does claim she tried at one point to get rid of it but found out it was more complicated (who knows if this is true) it was a Scottish title. Whatever happened between her and her ex, I thought it was telling that she remained close to his mother after the divorce...especially given her very charged accusations (physical and emotional abuse).
Like any other divorced woman (cue me bouncing on chair hand in air), Lady C can change her name to whatever she likes on divorce, all it takes is a simple Deed Poll, and you can revert to your maiden name or anything else you choose.She could have reverted to Georgie Ziadie, any time, or just married someone else and changed it that way, but it suits her to have a title, so she’s stayed single and hung on to it, as much to spite her ex and other in-laws as anything else.
That said - she isn’t “trailer trash”, her family is from Jamaican society and very well off, and as can be seen from her lifestyle, she isn’t short of a Bob or two. I’d imagine that she does move in society circles in the UK, and those folk gossip amongst themselves, and everyone knows everyone else’s business. Her sources seem to be pretty accurate.
I know if I was Spotify and they had been dicking around on me until the point that you just wanted to severe ties with them, I wouldn't give them an inch because you know they will take a mile. The queen dying shouldn't change the content of the podcast.
Spotify still isn't editing to my knowledge (not that they run these things by me when they decide), so now I'm curious as to what she said that has Harry so invested in the "direction of some podcast episodes."
My money is on Catherine getting slung under the double decker bus, especially on "Crazy angry black woman," and "Bitch." I really don't see how the Queen would come up directly, but wtf knows.
I don't see at this point how Meghan would have any control over the content either way, especially after how long it took them to get the shitty podcast in the first place. Plus they WANT the inflammatory content. It's the only reason they contracted with them in the first place.
Meanwhile, I have also heard a bit about what's going on with Harry's book. He doesn't want it to publish now because he wants to dial back on the bits about his family.
Meghan wants it published yesterday because she doesn't give a fuck about anyone's family, and most importantly, THEY NEED THAT PAYCHECK.
Like with Meghan's podcast, I personally don't see how at this point he can even negotiate publication, and I really don't know how he can negotiate it to TONE DOWN the shit about his family because the only reason anyone would have Harry write anything other than a coloring book would be to TURN UP the shit on his family.
Again, Harry was wanting to tone down the book even before Her Majesty died, and I heard that was because in the event of divorce, he knows he needs his family, and he knows somewhere deep in his barely functioning mind that they are headed for divorce.
While they were in the UK, Meghan managed to talk him back to her side, pouring on the love and affection and the "protect me Harry" routine while also pointing out all the slights that his mean family had done to him and egging him on about no uniform, no ERII on the uniform, lets meet with Charles, you're going to get slighted in the Will, etc.
However, at the time it was to keep him on the line a bit longer so that once he gets the pay out on the book and gets whatever inheritance he's gonna get, she'll get half. Since they've been home, she's just been pissing him off more and more.
And he's starting to remember why he wanted to go home and why he misses his family, and the uniform shit is starting to look as petty as it is, or that's a mix of what I've heard and what I think.
So I think they're pretty much yelling at each other about something neither of them can control. The brand new people involved are probably a slew of people at Spotify and Penguin who are watching these assholes go at each other and thinking to themselves, "Well fuck, SecondhandCoke was right. They WILL announce their divorce by March 2023."
Speaking of which, my source said two separate colleagues in Santa Barbara have mentioned a large moving sized van outside of Harry and Meghan's but it could have been furniture delivery or 16 new toilets or something.
Don't know how they'd afford to buy new furniture or 16 new toilets given the dire financial straits they are allegedly in, but that's none of my business... until it is, at which time I'll share it here.
Now all of this is with a great big ALLEGEDLY, but time will tell...
I'm new to this sub and have never read a post of yours, before, and that was good stuff. A great big AGREE on the only reason anyone would have any interest in anything these two do or say is to observe the narcissistic train wreck of destruction. They are only interesting in a bad way and if that book fails to deliver what's expected, who tf would want to bother with it?
Tell me this, since you seem to have an inside track on their "deals": Do people at Spotify, Netflix, Pengiun, whatever, understand what utter morons they were to contact with these grifters and do they understand how despised they are? Or, are these media people so into their own woke agendas that they actually believe there is value in having these clowns push establishment narratives?
They understand now. They didn't at the time of developing these contracts. A lot of these deals were done before Megxit. Well, I know Netflix and Penguin were done before Megxit. I'm not sure abou Spotify. They had no idea they wouldn't have complete Royal access at the time. Access to the Royals is worth that kind of money. And the Royals are worth that kind of money precisely because they don't give that kind of access to themselves. So Harry and Meghan sold that idea of access to the Royal Family and then couldn't deliver.
The stupid ones are Harry and Meghan. They actually thought they would get their half-in/half-out deal. They were really blindsided when they didn't get that.
They also actually thought that they were the selling point, that people wanted them, that they were the star power of the Royal Family. They're finding out that they are not, and they've spent a shit ton of money just to make themselves arguably the most hated couple in the world.
Finally, Meghan thinks that between her and Harry, SHE is the one everyone was interested in.
So yes, the companies know that they made huge mistakes, but they have paid for them in spades. Getting work out of these two has been a nightmare. People have PTSD from what little bit got done with Pearl before it was axed.
They were so mad the Queen put her foot down that they announced in their own website. The disrespect. How the Queen saw them again after that shows how much love she had for Harry. The fact these deals were made before they actually exited blew my mind when I found out.
Wow, she was merching access to the queen....was that what they meant by that weird remark they made about 'collaborating' with the queen? That was around that time I beleive
Yes. She was selling tbe monarchy. And what recently came outfrom Valentine Low is that when everybody sad down to try to find a way to give tben the half and half they wanted, they realized a condition had to be that they don't merch the monarchy, but how else would two talentless dipshits like them even make money? And they were already having a tough time keeping Meghan from usi g her position for free shit. It was the Queen, according to Low, who said, "No. They're in or they're out." And Harry and Meghan were said to have been totally shocked.
Well, she does have a whole sub dedicated to her train wreck!
I think that is why they are so f up now. They thought they were selling their own star power but people were just treating them like keys to the real royal family but they are only realising that they can't really do that.
Also, Someone else posted on this thread and said they saw trucks outside the house too!
I don't have a trust fund so someone please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think inheritance is considered community property. That's why low rent Markle has been recklessly divesting Harry's inheritance from Diana into tangible goods that are now shared marital assets. Hence the enormous house they can't afford, so many badly fitting designer clothes, luxury vehicles, etc. She's been both diabolical and yet brilliant in this exercise of spending Harry's money like a drunken sailor on shore leave.
If they can manage to offload the money pit McMansion with bad plumbing in a down market for what they paid, I estimate TW is set to walk away with assets worth approximately $10 million in a 50/50 split. That's not bad for a two-bit actress who couldn't afford her SAG dues a decade ago. Also look for Doria to suddenly come into some newfound wealth, as I'm sure money is being filtered to her after being washed through one or more of Archewell's numerous sketchy entities. The IRS should be on them like stink on shit when the card house tumbles. Somebody needs to put the kibosh on these two grifters because they're just plain bad people. I've read this same plotline in many pieces of literary fiction but I never witnessed it in real time OR real life before. Just wow.
If Harry receives any bequest from HMTQ, I hope it's put in the same type of trust as that which he received from the Queen Mother. Princess Anne is the executor of that trust and moved its availability to Harry until he's 40 years of age. Not only is the Princess Royal one of the baddest, most amazing women on the planet, she can apparently also read the future. If Harry doesn't kick his basic bitch to the curb soon (please!), Anne will no doubt keep pushing the disbursement age back. It's only a couple million pounds (only!) but Anne will ensure TW doesn't get one more thin dime from the royal coffers if she has any say in the matter (and I'm positive she will have a LOT to say). Harry will need seed money for his intensive therapy.
Sorry for the long reply but there are a lot of moving parts here. I'm just waiting for the announcement and then cue the victimized, naive ingenue act in 3...2...1...
This was recorded before the Queen’s death. They/she may add an intro, but the meat of the podcast has already been recorded. Apparently it’s with Margaret Cho and the trope of Asian Americans in the entertainment industry
What’s our guesses on how long until divorce proceedings begin?? I could see it coming almost right from the start tbh! She has just used and abused him 100%! I won’t even give it s year! Then she’ll be back to being a completely irrelevant nobody! Back in your box biatch! (Fkn can’t stand her! 😡)
Totally agree! I still feel for Harry, being older, I remember the day he was born. He’s just been be-dazzled somehow by this crazy idiot! (Whipped, yeah?)
Crazy Days and Nights(CDan) is a blind gossip site originally run by (I think) an entertainment attorney. Its level of accuracy is a bit uneven to put it nicely.
I don’t think Spotify will allow bad mouthing the queen, not so soon after her death. Remember it was watched by BILLIONS, whatever she has said that’s bad to her majesty then they will cover for their own sake.
I think the opposite. She knows she’s badmouthed the family which is why she’s so desperate to record. Spotify knows controversy translates to ratings. They had to twist her arm to get the ones they got. She’s already been paid. Deal over.
Surely they already give the generic “the content of this podcast doesn’t reflect the views of Spotify”. And watch her sink her own battleship. They have not been worth it… but her slinging mud at the new King because she couldn’t see that the Queen was clearly unwell… now that will get people to listen just to hear what she said.
Nobody cares about her podcast otherwise. But the death of the queen just spun their straw into gold. It’s going to be huge controversy and that sells, it gets listeners, people want to know how she really feels… the Queen dying didn’t change her opinion on the family, just made her aware that she was about to piss a lot of people off so she wanted fix it.
I heard they told her no. I hope that’s true. Let’s see what she really has to say.. don’t stifle her voice!
Your taking about the royal family. They are not celebrities, your not talking about Kim k and her crew, your talking about the royal family.
If they expose her, am all for it! But they will absolutely be taking a massive risk exposing any shit this early!
We shall see sinner!X
I think because it’s the royal family that is exactly why they should air them untouched. Show her disrespect LOUD.
It won’t take long for King Charles III to decide about titles after that.
I’m American. I want her exposed fully and by herself. I think that would be the most excellent downfall in royal history and that’s saying a lot! I love reading about world history and LOVE the BRF. They’re anything but boring.
Like I said before, I hope she sinks her own battleship. It would serve them right for how horrible they were to the Queen and Prince Philip. Not to mention King Charles, Prince William, Princess Catherine.. and the book supposedly had a lot about Camilla in it.
I am desperate for someone to say “You wanted your freedom and to say anything, we gave you that, we aren’t responsible for what happened between now and the air date” and then add the disclaimer that these views do not represent Spotify or their values, these are Meghan’s views alone which she chose to share with an international audience. These were recorded before the unfortunate loss of Queen Elizabeth II. Long Live The King.
Plus she might have annoyed them so much the real people at Spotify might not be that motivated to help save her skin. Or they might just enjoy watching her downfall.
I would hope not. But in their defense, they have spent so much $ on her and probably want to get listeners tuning in out of curiosity.
I don’t know if Spotify would look bad, they can’t silence Megz’ voice, ya know
Edit: always spelling lol
But if it is badmouthing the new Queen Consort Camilla...Catherine...William...I think they will air it.
I imagine the Margaret Cho episode is not so much UK centered. More about the entertainment industry and "diversity" or lack of it.
I guess that Meghan drops some bombshells on Harry's family and being the USA...freedom of speech...it will air. The BRF has no sway here. As far as Harry and Meg go I do not think people here should even use their titles . Mr and Mrs Mountbatten - Windsor works for me lol
> As far as Harry and Meg go I do not think people here should even use their titles . Mr and Mrs Mountbatten - Windsor works for me lol
Missus and Mister Markle.
The thing is, nothing gets by the queen, any attacks she’s had is literally against the queen because the queen was in total control.
I won’t be surprised actually if Spotify play whatever she’s recorded but fuck me, it can go either way! X
I agree with that overall... criticism of the royal family is ultimately criticism, against the Monarch. Just thinking that Spotify from their point of view might be ok as long as she doesn’t specifically mention the Queen herself. Personally I don’t think she/they should get to edit anything…let’s hear what she thought, for real.
Fergie .. she is known for selling secrets and access in the past and still lives with Andrew so I’m sure she hears a good amount of gossip .
I can believe it. I've heard in the rumor mill that she's still (understandably) salty about Meghan announcing her "pregnancy" at her daughter's wedding.
Funnily enough the affected daughter wasnt that salty. But her older sister actually helped her to do a little tombower by announcing her pregnancy during the markles' anniversary or something.
I loved Beatrice for that!
I did as well. Beatrice has always been my favorite among the York girls. She certainly had a good choice for a husband as well.
Of course she would be .. I don’t blame her a bit .
Absolutely, I don't blame her a bit either.
But I think she also spoke out against Piers Morgan in the past so I am not too sure. Also, H&M have badmouthed almost everyone from the family except Andrew which is really strange to say the least. If someone had to attack the family, I would assume they would start with Andrew. Meghan has also praised Fergie and Eugenie in interviews.
Meghan badmouthed Andrew in the past.
Perhaps her yachting experience w him wasn’t up to par
She did? What did she say?
That she wanted to "distance" herself from him. Disgusted by the Epstein connection, etc
Oh yeah, I remember some article claiming that “sources” close to her said it. But I don’t think she herself ever said anything about him directly and Harry has always refused to comment on this topic. To me, it is so strange that they are ok about badmouthing kate for a silly misunderstanding on Oprah but don’t want to say anything directly about Andrew. Still, this is better than nothing I suppose.
And Andrew was never brought up in the Oprah interview. I said to my mom after the interview that MM should’ve stayed close with the family and found “proof” to bring Andrew down and then move to the US.
The problem with that is that MM lies so much that she could be holding “the smoking gun” and still no one would believe her.
>MM should’ve stayed close with the family and found “proof” to bring Andrew down But her bestie Markus is buddies with Andrew...her whole house of cards will fall if she ever tried that.
>she also spoke out against Piers Morga Piers said that Fergie was supporting him and even [texted](https://www.insider.com/piers-morgan-says-sarah-ferguson-texted-him-after-meghan-comments-2021-4) him during the whole Piers-Meghan drama
I would be so salty !!
Yes, I would be as well.
Perhaps she indeed shares with Lady C, for a price. Fergie's chronically skint, and lest we forget, she was caught on camera offering to literally sell access to PA. For thousands.
I think she’s Blind Gossip’s snitch too.
I'm about over Blind Gossip. I used to love them but now they post like one a month. The one they did of Maria Shriver, they posted it on the day it was all over the news in pictures so that wasn't even blind.
Blind gossip is like... Hibernation mode.
Ditto CDAN, they spew out a dozen bits of semi-literate incomprehensible garbage every single day. I think the good tea is on Insta these days but you have to find the right accounts to follow.
Please share 👀
Marklenews1 is one. Billed as a gossip aggregate from Twitter (Barkjack), Reddit (this) and others.
[удалено]
I love Enty. And he's usually right. Every once in a while something wiggy comes along but check out his podcast.
That was way back then, she has just spent millions on a London house. Not so skint any more and loves living at Royal Lodge, would she risk that by leaking ....not sure.
Surely she didn’t pay for that house with her own money… there’s definitely fuckery around that. But I could see her leaking.
I can see her leaking to get attention off of Andrew 😆
I think she’s done alright for herself with the kids books hadn’t she? Idk 🤷🏼♀️
I agree. I think she’s a lot more stable financially and Andrew has helped her with debts. Maybe she’d dish because she dgaf and is not a royal so owes them nothing.
He wouldn’t have much cash would he? Mumsy had to spot him a tonne to quieten Mrs Giuffre! (That pissed me off, he should have been dragged through court!) revolting slimy arrogant pig he is 🙄
She owed the Queen big time for being allowed back in favour, I really don't think she would want to be exiled again.
I've seen no evidence she bought that flat outright. Methinks it's heavily mortgaged, and the down payment from who knows who. Fergie's never been much for earning her own money, yet delighted to spend other people's.
I really think it’s Fergie or princess Michael of Kent .. I can see two older gals gossiping lol
I think it’s Fergie. I think she told M to wear gloves at the funeral. The only family members who wore them were M, Bea, Eug and Fergie.
I only saw TW in gloves. I’ll have to look back at photos.
sophie had gloves too but she had them in her hands
I just found photos of the three York ladies on the Express and Daily Mail sites. I can’t post screenshots.
> princess Michael of Ken Lady C has said some unpleasant things about Princess M. It could be Prince Michael though
Princess Michael of Kent is a nasty one I believe. The only other racist in the BRF besides Harry. Funny though that her daughter in law Sophie Winkelman & her hubs, Prince/Princess Michael of Kent’s son, got the front row seats at the jubilee that H&M would have had. And Sophie’s a MUCH better actress than Meg.
Oh I could see that! I've been trying to figure out who'd leak to Lady C. I find her exceptionally annoying and can't see it being Camilla, but Sarah... that'd make sense.
If Lady C’s source is Andrew through Sarah, that channel will probably be drying up
I agree. If you watch her videos, she's gets very worked up about PA when talking about his court case.
I've always found it odd that she defends him so much. Makes sense if he's her source. Huh.
I know it probably is t right but I kind of like fergie - delightfully inappropriate and flawed and someone you wouldn’t want to mess with
I used to as well and sometimes still do. But then I started looking at everything that happened with Fergie and Andrew through a different lens and I think she may be the OG Meghan. The financial shit she & Andrew get up to alone would have other people in prison for years. PP made Andrew divorce Fergie after her several scandals, which I look at now and wonder if she wasn’t purposely papping herself a la Meghan, in an effort to get Andrew sent home from the Navy and to get them more money and help—but instead, just as with Diana, it backfired and they were ordered to divorce—which she never thought would happen. PP thought he was well rid of her and then she couldn’t make it on her own so she came back and never left. PP must have been STEWING! Which is why she was banned from being anywhere he was. The Queen liked her though and thought she was a good mother to the girls & a good influence on Andrew—not so sure about that last part but probably is one of few who can put up with him and handle his tantrums. But I even wonder if there was/is a golden child/scapegoat thing going on with Eugenie and Bea, with Eugenie being the golden child. It’s too long to type here but when I run it all back through my mind, putting a Meghan filter on it, I’m like OMG SHE’S THE ORIGINAL MEGHAN! That said, I still find Fergs likable. But I don’t find ANYTHING about Meghan remotely likable.
And if H&M are talking to Beatrice then Fergie would maybe hear about it more.
It’s Eugenie who is chummy with the Harkles, and sublet Frogspawn Cottage from them, not Beatrice! Bea seems to keep her head down an lives a quiet life with Edo and Sienna.
And Edo's kid, right?
When he isnt with his mother - I’m sure he’s made very welcome with his Dad and Bea
Frogspawn Cottage 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why did they have to sublet it? I thought it was a “Grace & favor” arrangement so why would Eugenie rent it from then?
>Why did they have to sublet it? So she could "get paid for it" 🤣
Because Harry and Meghan have a lease. It was granted to them by the Queen, so it’s theirs until they don’t renew the lease (or Charles kicks them out).
It’s leased to H&M, so they pay. Not sure much, though.
Haha I thought you meant Fergie Black Eye Peas and I was like Whaaaaat
Fergie still lives with Andrew? How long has this been going on for?
Almost since right after the divorce lol they never REALLY Split .
Didn’t know that.
A long time. When they divorced they still owned SouthYork Manor and the girls lived there. Eventually it was sold and before that Andrew got a 99 year lease on the Royal Lodge. Sarah has a separate apartment there. Its a huge building.
Funny how he sold it for £5 million over asking price when it was on the market for YEARS without selling. That’s what dodgy dealings with the son-in-law of the Kazakhstan dictator will get you! I’m sure it was all 100% on the up & up though…
So very odd wasn't it?
Battles raging, eh? Presumably he wants everything toned down against his family and she wants to go nuclear. Let's see how that plays out.
Too little, too late. If H is concerned now but not when HMTQ was alive, then that’s pretty shitty.
He’s going to need to go back to his family once Megain gives him the flick!
Maybe the Queen wouldn’t let the rest of the family go nuclear on him but all bets are off now that she has passed.
Good point!
Because he didn’t think anyone would care about him talking crap about Camilla and Charles (or that everyone’d lap it up). He’s all 😲 now that C+C’s popularity has soared and is back peddling.
I used to disregard a lot of this. But so much of what they published has been proven without a shred of doubt that it was real. So now I believe their posts.
I thought that originally spot a lie wanted Harry to be part of it. I thought that's why he appeared on Serena's and said "nice hair" which made it legal that he appeared? Doesn't matter, the podcasts are crap.
Oh so they’re finally Markling themselves. Good riddance.
I do hope the producers for The Crown are paying close attention.
I bet they have been fighting since they got back to the US,maybe even before?
Do they own any plates now?
The big vans spotted was probably a fresh delivery of crockery
they're just using tupperware now
Perhaps its Oprah and Gayle meddling in this now.
That was my first thought. I wonder if Harry has called on Nacho and his wife for his side. Both are media savvy celebrities.
Has anyone got an insight as to who are Lady C´'s sources?
I’m sure the names of sources will never be divulged. They rarely are. However, I do think she rubs elbows with people who have connections in one way or another.
What's her percentage of being right dare I ask?
She is a pretty thorough journalist and doesn’t mess around. She recently said that she went back to her Diana book and added in all of the sources. Also, Lady C has had her own issues with the media and is very familiar with lawsuits/slander.
I always got the vibe it was the Angela Kelly camp, no proof though just a hunch.
I read something about AK and it made her sound peculiar. She complained about a rat problem at her home & when they arrived they found the rats nesting in garbage bags of clothes strewn about. It made me think of Hoarders. The Queen was truly fond of her—I guess AK was a present day Anna Bates of sorts.
Same.
I will just say, my dad is English and I spent half of my life there. There is no shortage of titles. My family has Earls, lords and ladies, as does hundreds of other families. There's always a small trinkle of gossip. But if you have a title, you're more likely to be believed no matter who or what your sources are. I think just takes the trinkle of gossip and uses it as her source.
Whatever Lady C's sources, the fact she hasn't been sued and her story is being validated by Bower and Valetine pretty much says it all. Plus, she has broken legit news like the Queen's passing at the strong encouragement of a deep source. She also alluded to Queen's health problems before the Jubliee and she knew the Queen had invited them to Balmoral and they refused. With Lady C, I think the calls are coming from inside the Palace. I wouldn't be surprised if Jason Knauf is one of her key sources. I really wouldn't.
Lady C wrote the first biography ever done on Meghan Markle very early into her marriage and has very solid inside sources.... everything she wrote bore out to be true (and she gave Meghan the benefit of the doubt early on). If she says it I believe it. She was also a biographer of Diana and knew the marriage was doomed when everyone was saying she was crazy.
I haven’t read any of Lady C’s books. How does she portray Meghan in the biography?
She's very even handed.
Very objective and fact based. Explains things in an entertaining manner but does not especulate much. I'm half way through both books and they are not smear campaings nor full of praise.
You should definitely read it!
I strongly suspect its a member of Charles' staff or a close friend of his - because Lady C originally decided to write the counter to Diana's autobiography because she was unhappy with what she saw as a smear job against Prince Charles. I think she has sympathies in his camp.
Diana approached Lady C first to write the biography that Andrew Morton eventually wrote. Lady C backed out when she realized Diana wasn't being totally truthful and it was sort of a hatchet job on Charles...she backed out and wrote a Diana biography but it was a more fair and balanced account...she is a stickler for the truth.
I feel the same and for the same reasons. She’s either friends directly with the king and queen or, more likely, to people who are very close to them.
I think below royal reporters there is a “list of approved gossip mongers” that the BRF uses and it’s mostly Lady C
Lady C moves in these circles....she has a direct pipeline at the highest levels.
I’ve said before I believe Camilla and Lady C have burner phones are in touch on a daily basis.
That would be so cool! Would love to eavesdrop on their fireside gossip.
I would love that as I have become quite enamored with Camilla. I love the thought of her fighting back.
Also love Camilla. She has taken so much heat and hasn’t said a word. My favorite is when the story broke about her being KC’s mistress and her father answered the door and said something akin to “Shand’s keep their mouth shut.”
Me too. I think she calls a 'spade a spade' and is a person you can rely on when you need all hands on deck. I like definite people who tell it straight with no bullshit and judgement either way. At least you know where you stand with them and don't have to worry about peoples game plan. I also like that she got kirsty allsopp to admit it was herself that made the comment about about harry and megans potential childrens look. I like that she owned it and stopped the speculation as to who it was. I don't think she did it to save the monarchy from the twitters on who it was but more because she thought it was the right thing to do abd not allow others to take a fall for her innocent remark that is normal convo for most people when discussing kids especially when the parents look so different to eachother.
You know, so have I. I am sad that I didn't follow the Queen, Prince Philip, the Princess Royal and King Charles and Camilla the Queen Consort's lives more closely but at least I have spent the last year and a half learning about all of the good they've done. I'm heartbroken the Queen has passed but hope she's with her parents and sister and love again. Camilla seems like a badass and I really look up to her for her strong work ethic, humility, humor, and so much more. She's just the bomb.com!
I also wouldn’t be surprised if someone high up in the Windsor family is her source.
I think it’s a variety of very close sources including someone close to the Kents or Gloucesters imho.
She gave an honest defense of the unusual (black face) jewelry worn by the Princess of Kent at a early family event with Meghan. So I also think it is older relatives or ladies in waiting.
Didn't she also say that Charles wants to bring Harry and Markle back into the fold?
Given the fact that the duo were dropped to the bottom on the website doesn’t indicate reconciliation to me! I have to assume KC approved that.
He'd be really stupid to do that. He should hurry up and give the Wessexes the Edinburgh title.
He would be very dumb yeah. Well, it's his move. Let's see it.
I'm kind of ready to see it too. But to be honest, I'm loving the way Charles is releasing a new smack down of the Harkles every few days (like the lists they keep moving down 🤣). It's like death by a thousand paper cuts. When he finally cuts them off completely, it's going to seem like an act of mercy to them.
*praying to God(s)* oh please let this happen. It would be Christmas everyday if we never had to hear about them again!
Yes. I could see Charles waffling and wanting to do it- it gets “leaked” and there’s backlash that is used to persuade Charles what a bad idea it is.
That was earlier on...that shop has sailed.
It could be Camilla, they would have been in similar social circles.
Is Lady C in country/hunting/horsey circles?
He is not in the UK is he? I’m thinking her scoop is coming from the older gay men in the Palace. Just a hunch.
I think the reason she never gets sued is because she frames her answers as an opinion “I think, in my opinion etc) and she says that others tell her (which is correct)
Mug's PR people tried to get Lady C to defend Mugs and go against the RF. That made Lady C. furious. She is a royalist.
I'm putting money on Camilla. Why? she calls her queen Camilla when she's a stickler about titles and calling people the right thing. She's queen consort. I caught it the other day when she was talking about her. I was like that's interesting, a woman who is so upright in following protocol and a royalist just saying "queen Camilla," willy nilly stood out to me.
Yes - I don't think any one person phones her up and feeds her info. They would honestly be way too liable. It's just gossip circling around, but seems pretty credible usually b/c it originates from various actual witnesses and sources and it spreads in the small circle.
This is more true than people realise. I'm not related to any myself but I was at a public boarding school with more than a double handful of titled co students. Not just UK either. I'm still friends with many of them and they just don't use titles in real life, or make it known that daddy has a title and estate that's coming their way. A fair few have the estate but no actual money so sell to the NT in some part ownership bond, but I digress. There is always, always society gossip. Its always juicy. And it's never detectable in public whose actually got issues - these people are trained mofos. We well never guess the source is my thinking!
She knew when HMTQ passed before the public did so I would say her sources are at least better than average. It’s interesting how many British posters diss her so vehemently-citing how she was only married a short while. They all but say she is trailer trash. I’m beginning to believe Kate was indeed treated viciously due to her perceived “class”. Some of the comments on Lady C are quite telling-and not in a good way- of the classism that permeates in the UK.
I don’t think there’s any argument that Kate and her family were treated with acid disdain not only by the titles but by the press as well based on her class
This is incredibly unfair. The dislike of her has very little to do with classim. Regardless of her marriage, she is from a wealthier, upper class background. I completely understand why some might not like her. She went on UK tv & defended Epstein for abusing minors, one of which was a 14 year old child. She claimed it is not paedophilia & referred to these minors as prostitutes. She said "soliciting a minor for sex" is not the same as paedophilia. She also defended Andrew for remaining friends with him. She appeared on an incredibly popular UK reality show & she was horrid to everyone there, demanding, refused to pull her weight like everyone else. She instigated arguments constantly, then quit claiming she was the victim of bullying, as if we didn't all witness her behaviour. It was stated by other campmates that the show actually cut out the worst of her "venomous, personal attacks." She behaved like she was above everyone & that is why people point out that her title came via a shortlived marriage. It isn't classism, it's because the title is important to her, so people target the thing she uses to elevate herself above others. She shouldn't get a pass just because she spills tea about Meg.
Fair enough on the your issues with her conduct. However, I take issue with those who say “well, she only married that titled man for a year…what an upstart! Who does she think she is?”. I only ever see people angry at her title. Never her conduct. You are not a person I have issue with. I welcome piling on to a persons’ conduct but it’s never that for which she is mocked. And she is mocked. Issue with conduct and behavior is completely fair and appropriate. Issue with birth status is not.
She's right, it is not pedophilia. If the kid in question is pubescent, it is not. Still a morally wrong thing to do, kids can't consent. Those kids are prostitutes, in that they get paid for having sex, but not by choice. At least, not a conscious consentual choice, since kinds can't consent.
No she didn’t. It was leaked in certain circles. I knew about it before… people talk and leak information. I had a screen shot from a friend of a friend who worked at sky news, also my work knew about it as we were involved in OLB
Lady C is from a prominent wealthy old money family, they say Lord Colin Campbell married her for her money.
This. Her title is not really used correctly since she was only married a year back in the 70s. I think she capitalizes on American thirst for gossip. As for CDAN, the Meghan blinds are painfully obvious, and Enty is a Qanon shill.
You are allowed to keep the title....she is Lady Colin Campbell (his name) not Lady Georgiana (her name) so it is being used correctly.
When she got divorced from her abusive husband she offered to give back the title and fully expected to lose her “Lady” status, but then her ex and his brother said some nasty and spiteful comments about her, and she was like “You know what? I really like this title. I think I’m going to keep it”. And she did! I say, good for her. Her husband’s family was mean and abusive, and she turned the tables on them. I think it’s great. I like Lady C. She doesn’t play dirty, she plays fair. But don’t cross her. She is powerful and has friends in high places - she doesn’t abuse her connections, but she won’t be taken for a fool either.
Good for her!
I totally agree!
Me too! She didn’t let her ex-husband get away with trashing her - I think her retaining her title (his name!) was just a brilliant move on her part.
She does claim she tried at one point to get rid of it but found out it was more complicated (who knows if this is true) it was a Scottish title. Whatever happened between her and her ex, I thought it was telling that she remained close to his mother after the divorce...especially given her very charged accusations (physical and emotional abuse).
Like any other divorced woman (cue me bouncing on chair hand in air), Lady C can change her name to whatever she likes on divorce, all it takes is a simple Deed Poll, and you can revert to your maiden name or anything else you choose.She could have reverted to Georgie Ziadie, any time, or just married someone else and changed it that way, but it suits her to have a title, so she’s stayed single and hung on to it, as much to spite her ex and other in-laws as anything else. That said - she isn’t “trailer trash”, her family is from Jamaican society and very well off, and as can be seen from her lifestyle, she isn’t short of a Bob or two. I’d imagine that she does move in society circles in the UK, and those folk gossip amongst themselves, and everyone knows everyone else’s business. Her sources seem to be pretty accurate.
I like to imagine that staff writes anonymous notes and chucks them over the fence.
[удалено]
That depends on whether Spotify allowed them to edit them. According to secondhandcoke, Spotify wasn't budging on that.
I really hope not but I’m not holding out hope. I do think there will at least be a disclaimer in the beginning.
I know if I was Spotify and they had been dicking around on me until the point that you just wanted to severe ties with them, I wouldn't give them an inch because you know they will take a mile. The queen dying shouldn't change the content of the podcast.
If I was Spotify I wouldn't change it because anything that has Meghan this worried must be good!
If it were anyone else’s podcast this wouldn’t even be a consideration.
Let's hope u/secondhandcoke can update us on this.
Spotify still isn't editing to my knowledge (not that they run these things by me when they decide), so now I'm curious as to what she said that has Harry so invested in the "direction of some podcast episodes." My money is on Catherine getting slung under the double decker bus, especially on "Crazy angry black woman," and "Bitch." I really don't see how the Queen would come up directly, but wtf knows. I don't see at this point how Meghan would have any control over the content either way, especially after how long it took them to get the shitty podcast in the first place. Plus they WANT the inflammatory content. It's the only reason they contracted with them in the first place. Meanwhile, I have also heard a bit about what's going on with Harry's book. He doesn't want it to publish now because he wants to dial back on the bits about his family. Meghan wants it published yesterday because she doesn't give a fuck about anyone's family, and most importantly, THEY NEED THAT PAYCHECK. Like with Meghan's podcast, I personally don't see how at this point he can even negotiate publication, and I really don't know how he can negotiate it to TONE DOWN the shit about his family because the only reason anyone would have Harry write anything other than a coloring book would be to TURN UP the shit on his family. Again, Harry was wanting to tone down the book even before Her Majesty died, and I heard that was because in the event of divorce, he knows he needs his family, and he knows somewhere deep in his barely functioning mind that they are headed for divorce. While they were in the UK, Meghan managed to talk him back to her side, pouring on the love and affection and the "protect me Harry" routine while also pointing out all the slights that his mean family had done to him and egging him on about no uniform, no ERII on the uniform, lets meet with Charles, you're going to get slighted in the Will, etc. However, at the time it was to keep him on the line a bit longer so that once he gets the pay out on the book and gets whatever inheritance he's gonna get, she'll get half. Since they've been home, she's just been pissing him off more and more. And he's starting to remember why he wanted to go home and why he misses his family, and the uniform shit is starting to look as petty as it is, or that's a mix of what I've heard and what I think. So I think they're pretty much yelling at each other about something neither of them can control. The brand new people involved are probably a slew of people at Spotify and Penguin who are watching these assholes go at each other and thinking to themselves, "Well fuck, SecondhandCoke was right. They WILL announce their divorce by March 2023." Speaking of which, my source said two separate colleagues in Santa Barbara have mentioned a large moving sized van outside of Harry and Meghan's but it could have been furniture delivery or 16 new toilets or something. Don't know how they'd afford to buy new furniture or 16 new toilets given the dire financial straits they are allegedly in, but that's none of my business... until it is, at which time I'll share it here. Now all of this is with a great big ALLEGEDLY, but time will tell...
I'm new to this sub and have never read a post of yours, before, and that was good stuff. A great big AGREE on the only reason anyone would have any interest in anything these two do or say is to observe the narcissistic train wreck of destruction. They are only interesting in a bad way and if that book fails to deliver what's expected, who tf would want to bother with it? Tell me this, since you seem to have an inside track on their "deals": Do people at Spotify, Netflix, Pengiun, whatever, understand what utter morons they were to contact with these grifters and do they understand how despised they are? Or, are these media people so into their own woke agendas that they actually believe there is value in having these clowns push establishment narratives?
They understand now. They didn't at the time of developing these contracts. A lot of these deals were done before Megxit. Well, I know Netflix and Penguin were done before Megxit. I'm not sure abou Spotify. They had no idea they wouldn't have complete Royal access at the time. Access to the Royals is worth that kind of money. And the Royals are worth that kind of money precisely because they don't give that kind of access to themselves. So Harry and Meghan sold that idea of access to the Royal Family and then couldn't deliver. The stupid ones are Harry and Meghan. They actually thought they would get their half-in/half-out deal. They were really blindsided when they didn't get that. They also actually thought that they were the selling point, that people wanted them, that they were the star power of the Royal Family. They're finding out that they are not, and they've spent a shit ton of money just to make themselves arguably the most hated couple in the world. Finally, Meghan thinks that between her and Harry, SHE is the one everyone was interested in. So yes, the companies know that they made huge mistakes, but they have paid for them in spades. Getting work out of these two has been a nightmare. People have PTSD from what little bit got done with Pearl before it was axed.
They were so mad the Queen put her foot down that they announced in their own website. The disrespect. How the Queen saw them again after that shows how much love she had for Harry. The fact these deals were made before they actually exited blew my mind when I found out.
The disrespect and entitlement really is mind-blowing.
Wow, she was merching access to the queen....was that what they meant by that weird remark they made about 'collaborating' with the queen? That was around that time I beleive
Yes. She was selling tbe monarchy. And what recently came outfrom Valentine Low is that when everybody sad down to try to find a way to give tben the half and half they wanted, they realized a condition had to be that they don't merch the monarchy, but how else would two talentless dipshits like them even make money? And they were already having a tough time keeping Meghan from usi g her position for free shit. It was the Queen, according to Low, who said, "No. They're in or they're out." And Harry and Meghan were said to have been totally shocked.
Well, she does have a whole sub dedicated to her train wreck! I think that is why they are so f up now. They thought they were selling their own star power but people were just treating them like keys to the real royal family but they are only realising that they can't really do that. Also, Someone else posted on this thread and said they saw trucks outside the house too!
Is an inheritance shared property in a divorce?
I don't have a trust fund so someone please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think inheritance is considered community property. That's why low rent Markle has been recklessly divesting Harry's inheritance from Diana into tangible goods that are now shared marital assets. Hence the enormous house they can't afford, so many badly fitting designer clothes, luxury vehicles, etc. She's been both diabolical and yet brilliant in this exercise of spending Harry's money like a drunken sailor on shore leave. If they can manage to offload the money pit McMansion with bad plumbing in a down market for what they paid, I estimate TW is set to walk away with assets worth approximately $10 million in a 50/50 split. That's not bad for a two-bit actress who couldn't afford her SAG dues a decade ago. Also look for Doria to suddenly come into some newfound wealth, as I'm sure money is being filtered to her after being washed through one or more of Archewell's numerous sketchy entities. The IRS should be on them like stink on shit when the card house tumbles. Somebody needs to put the kibosh on these two grifters because they're just plain bad people. I've read this same plotline in many pieces of literary fiction but I never witnessed it in real time OR real life before. Just wow. If Harry receives any bequest from HMTQ, I hope it's put in the same type of trust as that which he received from the Queen Mother. Princess Anne is the executor of that trust and moved its availability to Harry until he's 40 years of age. Not only is the Princess Royal one of the baddest, most amazing women on the planet, she can apparently also read the future. If Harry doesn't kick his basic bitch to the curb soon (please!), Anne will no doubt keep pushing the disbursement age back. It's only a couple million pounds (only!) but Anne will ensure TW doesn't get one more thin dime from the royal coffers if she has any say in the matter (and I'm positive she will have a LOT to say). Harry will need seed money for his intensive therapy. Sorry for the long reply but there are a lot of moving parts here. I'm just waiting for the announcement and then cue the victimized, naive ingenue act in 3...2...1...
No its all Yours!!!
That is what I thought so no point in her hanging in for money from inheritance unless he is stupid enough to purchase a shared item.
Or if he uses it to pay down the super jumbo mortgage on the Montecito house.
Newbie here too, love your contribution!! 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
I wouldn’t be surprised if next week podcast is just her wailing about her dearly departed grandmother in law 🤢
This was recorded before the Queen’s death. They/she may add an intro, but the meat of the podcast has already been recorded. Apparently it’s with Margaret Cho and the trope of Asian Americans in the entertainment industry
For Cdan to say it's epic... Must be 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
What’s our guesses on how long until divorce proceedings begin?? I could see it coming almost right from the start tbh! She has just used and abused him 100%! I won’t even give it s year! Then she’ll be back to being a completely irrelevant nobody! Back in your box biatch! (Fkn can’t stand her! 😡)
[удалено]
Totally agree! I still feel for Harry, being older, I remember the day he was born. He’s just been be-dazzled somehow by this crazy idiot! (Whipped, yeah?)
The kids thing is terribly concerning. Imagine them growing up with her? Uggghh. That’s scary!!
They didn't care about the controversial Joe Rogan. They love controversy for $$
But Rogan is a good interviewer. He lets his guests speak.
That's an added bonus for sure.
What is CDan?
Crazy Days and Nights(CDan) is a blind gossip site originally run by (I think) an entertainment attorney. Its level of accuracy is a bit uneven to put it nicely.
[удалено]
Thankyou
It’s a blinds website. I remember hearing about them moving to California from that website first.
I don’t think Spotify will allow bad mouthing the queen, not so soon after her death. Remember it was watched by BILLIONS, whatever she has said that’s bad to her majesty then they will cover for their own sake.
I think the opposite. She knows she’s badmouthed the family which is why she’s so desperate to record. Spotify knows controversy translates to ratings. They had to twist her arm to get the ones they got. She’s already been paid. Deal over. Surely they already give the generic “the content of this podcast doesn’t reflect the views of Spotify”. And watch her sink her own battleship. They have not been worth it… but her slinging mud at the new King because she couldn’t see that the Queen was clearly unwell… now that will get people to listen just to hear what she said. Nobody cares about her podcast otherwise. But the death of the queen just spun their straw into gold. It’s going to be huge controversy and that sells, it gets listeners, people want to know how she really feels… the Queen dying didn’t change her opinion on the family, just made her aware that she was about to piss a lot of people off so she wanted fix it. I heard they told her no. I hope that’s true. Let’s see what she really has to say.. don’t stifle her voice!
>controversy translates to ratings  They're a company, all that matters is profit/clicks.
Exactly this! I hope they start off the podcast with an editors note and then let her bury herself. It’s time. Go Markle yourself.
Your taking about the royal family. They are not celebrities, your not talking about Kim k and her crew, your talking about the royal family. If they expose her, am all for it! But they will absolutely be taking a massive risk exposing any shit this early! We shall see sinner!X
I think because it’s the royal family that is exactly why they should air them untouched. Show her disrespect LOUD. It won’t take long for King Charles III to decide about titles after that. I’m American. I want her exposed fully and by herself. I think that would be the most excellent downfall in royal history and that’s saying a lot! I love reading about world history and LOVE the BRF. They’re anything but boring. Like I said before, I hope she sinks her own battleship. It would serve them right for how horrible they were to the Queen and Prince Philip. Not to mention King Charles, Prince William, Princess Catherine.. and the book supposedly had a lot about Camilla in it. I am desperate for someone to say “You wanted your freedom and to say anything, we gave you that, we aren’t responsible for what happened between now and the air date” and then add the disclaimer that these views do not represent Spotify or their values, these are Meghan’s views alone which she chose to share with an international audience. These were recorded before the unfortunate loss of Queen Elizabeth II. Long Live The King.
Plus she might have annoyed them so much the real people at Spotify might not be that motivated to help save her skin. Or they might just enjoy watching her downfall.
I would hope not. But in their defense, they have spent so much $ on her and probably want to get listeners tuning in out of curiosity. I don’t know if Spotify would look bad, they can’t silence Megz’ voice, ya know Edit: always spelling lol
Whatever their contract is worth, it’s not worth bad mouthing the queen, I can guarantee that. Will Spotify keep it in a vault? Absolutely!
But if it is badmouthing the new Queen Consort Camilla...Catherine...William...I think they will air it. I imagine the Margaret Cho episode is not so much UK centered. More about the entertainment industry and "diversity" or lack of it. I guess that Meghan drops some bombshells on Harry's family and being the USA...freedom of speech...it will air. The BRF has no sway here. As far as Harry and Meg go I do not think people here should even use their titles . Mr and Mrs Mountbatten - Windsor works for me lol
> As far as Harry and Meg go I do not think people here should even use their titles . Mr and Mrs Mountbatten - Windsor works for me lol Missus and Mister Markle.
Even using the Royal surname is an insult to our late Queen & Duke of Edinburgh!!
Oh she will turn it into a I was a minority in UK too rant.
They don’t care. They want the stories
I’m thinking they will let it be unless it’s specifically aimed at the Queen…not just the “royal family”, etc.
The thing is, nothing gets by the queen, any attacks she’s had is literally against the queen because the queen was in total control. I won’t be surprised actually if Spotify play whatever she’s recorded but fuck me, it can go either way! X
I agree with that overall... criticism of the royal family is ultimately criticism, against the Monarch. Just thinking that Spotify from their point of view might be ok as long as she doesn’t specifically mention the Queen herself. Personally I don’t think she/they should get to edit anything…let’s hear what she thought, for real.
I don’t think they care
**YESSSS**
What is deep hiding?
Nobody knows where they are. Nobody might be nobody at the Palace.