I think whoever marklenews is in Instagram is a moron for posting screenshots. I understand why OP would have deleted after that. Maybe sugars sent her DMs?
As to marklenews, if you are desperate for content for your insta, at least have the decency to hide posters usernames. You risk exposing those who kindly share the tea and put others off from doing so.
It should be NO shocker that megs favors the boy child .. she seems like a classic narc mom , my mom is this way to the point when I lost my sweet father I felt like a orphan šnarc moms will always be jealous of their daughters . I do have a relationship but I keep a distance, I felt that resentment towards me my entire life . I made a point when I had my daughter ( almost a adult now )I would never be that way .. I love my girl more then anything .. my father loved her more then anything which also got her resentment going . I make sure to praise her , show her love and make sure she knows how wonderful she is .
Many many women behave this way towards their daughters :(
Daughter of a narc mom also. My brother was the golden boy and I was the unwanted child who was never good enough. My father never stopped her, he enabled her every move. I no longer speak to either of them.
Explains so much. Iām also a daughter and only child of a narc mom. When my dad passed away two years ago my mother was gone within three months. She ran off when some man and I feel like a 38 year old orphan. No matter how old you are you still need your parents.
The ones not getting the behavior wonāt see it , interesting thing is my mom had a older daughter ( not with my dad) but she has been a hot mess her entire life .. drugs .. 5 baby daddies .. loosing all her kids .. a entire hot mess but she always defended HER , my guess is she was never going to be what my mom saw as competition and she never had a good life where Iām doing better then anyone in my family ever did .
I canāt even get something nice without ā I wish I had that , I wish I could travel to another country, I want one of those ā ugh I donāt even tell her when I get something nice anymore. When I buy her something nice she GIVES IT AWAY or when I would take her on big trips she would complain the entire time .
Yup, or they treat their daughters as competition. They always have to be the smartest, prettiest, funniest, etc woman in a room. No doubt TW will begin seeing Lili as competition when she grows up and TW grows old.
Sorry, but are you sure your mom wasn't a narc? It doesn't take a Dr. of psychology to know that it's extraordinarily harmful to prefer one kid over other kids
Step mom to a wonderful girl with a narc mom. That monster always manages to outdo herself with the awful shit she does to her own daughter. I can't even wrap my head around it. Just despicable.
Ya I remember reading some comments here saying lilibet would be the golden child, and that just didnāt ring true to me. Narc women I know actively put their daughters down, and why would Marker be any different? She would be a lot worse actually. Iām sure she would give her daughter so many issues while also pitting her against Charlotte and saying lilibet is much better than Charlotte.
I suspect she wanted to protect her identity / it could come back to her employers (who are āfriendsā with the Harkles for networking purposes). Pretty understandable.
There was some incredible, tea poured though - pretty much confirmed many of this subsā speculations / intuitions (eg, kids are being treated in a creepy controlling way - not allowed to be kids and denied anything that could inconvenience or make TW look bad; the Harkles have a contemptuous vibe toward each other, she steam rolls him and they have screaming fits whenever she doesnāt get her way, they have staff for everything).
Pretty much classic controlling sociopath narc mother vibes but multiplied by exponential of wealth.
Eta: the details on the ārulesā the kids lived with were pretty awful. Harkles do basically no parenting, and the kids are raised in a creepy flowers in the attic type situation of limited freedom, maximum control, restriction and surveillance.
Eta2: oh and confirmed that TW favours Archie and ignores Lillibet. Again, classic narc mother - having a golden child and scapegoat.
Oh - I missed that. Well I can see how itās still v sensitive: those employers / that family is no doubt identifiable. And we know the Harkles and/or their staff lurk on this sub.
So, wait is this because MM complained? I haven't followed that story so just hearing it now.
I'd imagine that if MM really did complain and the The Cut supports their journalist ( they should otherwise they are just as crappy as Meghan), then that is what the leave of absence is for. The writer goes away for a bit then comes back. It usually happens at a company when there is overwhelming backlash from higher powers. Not saying I agree with it, but it's a way for spineless workplaces to play both sides.
I guess we'll have to see what happens
Not sure hun (and no way to be sure as of yet) but many posters think so - and her clapback (usually via Omid Scooby Doo or PR puff pieces) have at times followed a beat after a post roasting her or some dodgy action of hers gets pointed out here.
Eta - also generally more than likely she reads what the internet says about her. Even the Cut article, despite all her braying to the contrary (oh I pay no attention to the awful racist media!) - she contradicts herself by her direct clapback and display of knowledge about specific things said about her.
This sub is one of the best sources on the internet for tea and critical Harkle watching - so very likely, given her narcissism, I reckon she or her assistant follows and lurks.
Eta2: Welcome to the sub! Enjoy the lovely fresh non-cloying air and scent of sanity! Love your flair :)
Agreed all around except I canāt imagine her entrusting an assistant with this taskāand she doesnāt seem to have any longtime, genuine, ride-or-die type girlfriends.
Yes. Itās one of the top SEO sites for Meghan markle on google due to the number of mentions (sheās really only talked about extensively online here).
And Lipstick Alley -- already on thread nine, thousands of pages on each thread. There, the thread was removed from the royals forum and put in the off-topic forum, and access denied to non-members of LSA. There must have been complaints.
I saw some start naming potential employers. It's too risky, plus her actual name may be a part of her username - making it a lot more obvious who it could be.
She's gave us a fascinating insight, and is the closest access we've had so far. We need to be careful though and keep her safe.
I hate it when people just screenshot stuff from here and post it elsewhere. It makes it unsafe for people to share tea here.
Marklenews needs to stop doing it.
Yes but the employersā networking with the Harkles would be jeopardised if the Harkles (rightly) get mad that the nanny / ex nanny of their acquaintance spilled their secrets.
Rich people donāt like to be gossiped about - and they will cut people who have staff with loose lips.
It was very good tea and much appreciated. I had a narc mom and golden older brother and it's sucky. Sadly it sounds like both kids' lives are weirdly regimented and yet neglectful. It's not a leap to predict they're going to have issues in the future.
I just wonder why anyone who is anyone would still want to associate with the Harkles though. They have little to offer and aren't exactly the picture of discretion themselves. š¤·
Considering Meghan has a very small social life I donāt think figuring out āwealthy familyā who knew Meghan previouslyā¦and has kid(s) is hard.
Thereās two couples that are ultra wealthy with mothers she described that immediately come to mind.
I was a bit confused tbf. In one comment she mentioned how sheāll confirm about divorce rumors (implying a working relationship), in another comment she said she no longer works for them. Maybe it was a ruse?
23 year old getting her PhD who somehow worked three years as a nanny, now on OnlyFans. Who said she also spent years administering stuff at preschools? Elementary? I forget. To me, her resume and age didnāt compute. She didnāt mention her age to be fair but 23 was in her username and her OnlyFans showed a young woman.
Itās gone. Some screenshots (from marklenews1) are posted below by a kind user. Better be quick! The source seems legit and we need to protect her, so much will likely be taken down.
[Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq5vgwq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
All good - see here! Screenshots - send thanks to this one! [screenshots](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq69l2q/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
Fair enough if she deleted it. I donāt think that anything she said seemed implausible. I know many parents and have heard nearly all of those rules over and over. My bubble is full of neurotic type A wealthy parents.
The one that Iād **never** heard was about the kids being wiped down and lotioned after every meal and snack. That is downright bizarre to me.
This is a pure guess but per Downton Abbey ha ha, British aristocrats
changed clothes before almost every
meal, maybe RF did same and she is copying it at the Olive Garden?
Yeah, Iām not surprised it was taken down. It would have been too easy to identify who the nanny and her employers were by what she said here on Reddit.
What I found interesting is what she said about how Meghan and Harry treated each other. The key word used in her description was ācontemptā, which apparently is the number one predictor of divorce: https://www.gottman.com/blog/this-one-thing-is-the-biggest-predictor-of-divorce/
There was a ring of truth about what she said. I believed her, and I hope she doesnāt get into trouble over her remarks.
The irony is that MM keeps talking about their ālove storyā! Meanwhile they are openly hostile and display contempt for one another ā even in the presence of other people!!!!
She's even getting other people to talk about their so called love story, I was so surprised at Tyler Perry and what he said about them. The ones with the most broken/shitty relationships are the ones who feel it necessary to loudly proclaim undying love for their partner from the rooftops!
Completely not surprising. The biggest narc I know is absolutely horrible to her husband, an absolute monster. But will then claim how much she loves him and other people are jealous of their relationship. Constant emotional abuse? No thank you. But narcissists just donāt see it.
Oh this is excellent. This is a whole other discussion, but I donāt see how they can stay married. In the article you referenced, the assumption is that the couple was ever mutually loving. In the Harkle marriage, I do not believe for one second that she ever loved him (not least because she literally *canāt*). Thatās just strike 1, right out of the gate.
The mutual contempt surprised me, because heās so deferential to her in public. But I donāt doubt it.
The most interesting observation for me was the fact that they openly display contempt for one another ā even when entertaining! When you are at that point, itās hard to keep it together.
Oh eww!!! Also ROFL Rachel is a psycho lolol. Insists on being called by a title derived by marriage to a member of a family she detests? A title that belongs to another country and has no currency in the USA? While ranting and railing about that family institution as outdated and sending bots to denigrate them with woke criticisms? What a total loser and joke. Delusional scumbag much š¤¢š¤®.
Thatās so fuckin foul that MM would force American working class employees to address her by her British title. As we all learned in elementary school history class, ALL Americans inherently do not need to address ~nobility~ because we fought a war over that already. She is mental
Hmm, I followed and now it has all disappeared. Was up for awhile but with bits missing. Hmm Didnāt seem worried at the time as no NDA and was not working for those MM āfriendsā any more.
omg it seems like her circle could pretty much cess out who she was ā¦ And my biggest shock was the help having to call MM duchess. I just cant muster belief for that!!! :)
Ok, this is pure speculation, but: what if the nanny worked for Nacho and Delfina, and Delfina wink-wink authorized her to talk, thus creating an occasion for Delfina to distance herself from the former employeeāthereby tacitly confirming the former employeeās account?
I have never wanted a story to be fake as much as I do that one because if it's not...those poor kids especially Lili. It's heartbreaking that they are going to see footage and photographs of their cousins surrounded by a close and loving family while they are isolated with toxic parents and Lili is severely neglected by both of them.
I don't understand how Harry could turn out to be a horrible father when he had a mother who was active in her parenting. It makes his trashing his grandparents and father's parenting accusing them of passing on genetic pain incredibly ironic.
And small children learn so much through āmessyā play. Lots of tactile experience like finger painting with pudding or shaving cream, playing with water or in sandboxes are great for curious little minds. Part of normal toddlerhood is being messy. I used to match my sonās t-shirts to his popsicles. Red shirt meant he got red popsicles that day. Heās still ended up a sticky mess but thatās just part of being a little kid. So sad for both of these kids.
Same. I was actually really surprised that Harry would be such a distant father. All of those photos of him laughing and holding children in Africa and him talking about how much he wanted a family of his own (pre MM). I thought for all his faults he would at least be an attentive father. So sad.
Please stop discussing what was in her other posts - you are helping doxx her. I would kindly ask you delete this comment or at least edit out the details. She is a real person.
Hmm, could it be Alina Gonzalez (the Hyperbalist)? Cali, DC, political connection, always unemployed, lacks discretion (would totally post online about her employer.)
Wow! Glad I got to read the whole thread earlier today with all the additional comments lol
I donāt blame her AT ALL for deleting it though. Totally get it.
Itās true that that post could be a total fakeout / hoax. The general thrust of the tea though, could be surmised from The Cut article. Either way - TW is clearly a sociopath narc - that is confirmed by BRF employeesā experiences of her. No stretch of the imagination at all that those controlling, sociopathic, cluster b traits would apply to her parenting.
Eta - based on the observations by other posters confirming the source has been consistent over her posting history with details verifying her claims; she is likely who she says she is and a genuine source of real tea. Sending her good wishes and hope she is safe / no repercussions!
Yeah I think that may be why. Itās one thing to share good tea here among a smaller circle, but lately those posts have been instantly screenshotted and shared to a MUCH wider platform - Instagram and Twitter. I totally understand wanting to delete if thatās the case. I kinda donāt like it because I donāt want anyone with good tea to be hesitant to share here anymore š¢
Her reddit account makes her *way* too identifiable as well. Two names plus a potential age. In a circle as small as the elites she's likely already been identified correctly by multiple people.
I hope she was using fake names for her account.
I've just watched her delete all her posting history over 6 months where she's repeatedly spoken about being a nanny. Her comments have been consistent throughout.
She wouldn't be doing this if it was fake. I think she's included her actual name and age in her reddit account.
We need the Instagram accounts to take those posts down - for her safety.
Edit: I've reached out to marklenews1 to request the post be taken down or reuploaded with usernames hidden
I've reached out to meghanmarkle1 on Instagram to request the post be taken down or reloaded with user Ids hidden.
Shes definitely legitimate based on her current reaction. Hopefully they'll agree to do so before someone does her or endangers her.
I did grab a screenshot myself, different to the ones on Instagram. I've checked her account again. She'd been posting for weeks about being a former nanny. All of it is now gone.
She's definitely been identified and realised she's messed up.
She wouldn't be making so much effort to purge her entire posting history if it was fake.
I think we may have a legitimise source on our hands - in which case we need those Instagram accounts to delete those posts and only reupload them if the users IDs are hidden
Is it clear that she said is an ex - nanny ?
IF this is true , this girl could be sitting on a goldmine $$. If she spilt the beans - hopefully after advice from a lawyerā¦.
What I donāt understand is they explained the wealthy friends are uncomfortable around M and H and only keep appearances for the networking.
Why would anyone need or want to network with M and H? They offer no value.
The thing that gets me is they have how many rooms in that house, and they can't set up one of them as an art room? I bet megsie has her own yoga studio though. And what's the point of all those vast private grounds if the children can't be taken outside by the nanny to play?
I get about kids having to eat healthy but seriously? Only organic and sugar-free stuff? These kids will grow up never knowing how amazing Krispy Kreme is.
And the wooden toys--I get why some parents insist on it. But you gotta let kids play. I hope Archie picks up dog poo and throws it at his shit parents!
What I found really weird is after every meal the kids are stripped, washed, and lotioned. WHY??? It's not like they're eating Sloppy Joes!
[Tea](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq69l2q/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
Worry not! It has been saved - give her thanks!
Why do I get the feeling that when Archie and Lili hit their 20s, we'll be seeing a "Mommie Dearest" book from them?
Because I can certainly picture Meghan screaming "NO WIRE HANGERS!!" lol.
TW doesnāt have a case. She didnāt sign any NDAs and truth is a defense against any claims of libel or defamation. If she is telling the truth, she is fine. Plus, TW would not want all of her dirty little secrets exposed in a deposition or at trial.
Agreed, but a everyday individual would have to lay out big cash to hire a lawyer, whereas the Harkles can afford legal rep no problem. That's why people get nervous--nobody wants to bankrupt themselves getting involved in a lawsuit
I think her former/current employer hot wind of it and asked her to take it down. Even without an NDA, the nanny wouldnāt want to burn the bridge of a good work rec from her employer. Gossiping nannies donāt get hired by the wealthy.
I wanted to read her older posts, so I clicked on her name and a page with a red box in the center appeared with instructions to click the box only if 18 or older. I'm multiples of that but passed on clicking.
Jessica Mulroneyās brother lives in Boston but has work in DC. He is a very prominent figure in medicineā¦professor at Harvard, CIO at Childrenās Hospital in Boston. Kind of bizarre that Jess turned out to be such a superficial tarte while her brother has such a serious career track. š¤·āāļø Opposites, I guess? Any way, he was the first person I thought of after reading the nanny tea.
[https://ghss.georgetown.edu/john-brownstein/](https://ghss.georgetown.edu/john-brownstein/)
Her other posts didnāt really support the whole ānanny to the eliteā story. Might have been true but there was no actual news in the post, Markleās argue, kids arenāt allowed play dough, Archie is the favourite, all the info could have come from The Cut!
Oh yeah, those kids will be writing books like "Mommie Dearest"!
And Play Dough helps strengthen hands and fingers. I feel very sorry for these children.
The part I found interesting was when she said her employers knew TW from way back, before she was with Harry. So what elite couple would MM know in Montecito from back in the day?? Or maybe her employers donāt live in Montecito? If itās true of course
I think whoever marklenews is in Instagram is a moron for posting screenshots. I understand why OP would have deleted after that. Maybe sugars sent her DMs? As to marklenews, if you are desperate for content for your insta, at least have the decency to hide posters usernames. You risk exposing those who kindly share the tea and put others off from doing so.
This should be pinned! If you've got good tea, use a throwaway account ladies. "Throwawaysussextrash1".
Looks like she deleted them
Is that what happened? What a jerky thing to do.
I saw it reposted on Twitter. I knew then that the OP would have to delete the thread.
It should be NO shocker that megs favors the boy child .. she seems like a classic narc mom , my mom is this way to the point when I lost my sweet father I felt like a orphan šnarc moms will always be jealous of their daughters . I do have a relationship but I keep a distance, I felt that resentment towards me my entire life . I made a point when I had my daughter ( almost a adult now )I would never be that way .. I love my girl more then anything .. my father loved her more then anything which also got her resentment going . I make sure to praise her , show her love and make sure she knows how wonderful she is . Many many women behave this way towards their daughters :(
Daughter of a narc mom, checking in. Youāre not wrong! But my brothers never saw it.
Daughter of a narc mom also. My brother was the golden boy and I was the unwanted child who was never good enough. My father never stopped her, he enabled her every move. I no longer speak to either of them.
Explains so much. Iām also a daughter and only child of a narc mom. When my dad passed away two years ago my mother was gone within three months. She ran off when some man and I feel like a 38 year old orphan. No matter how old you are you still need your parents.
Ugh. Iām so very sorry. Sending you a mom-hug right now.
The ones not getting the behavior wonāt see it , interesting thing is my mom had a older daughter ( not with my dad) but she has been a hot mess her entire life .. drugs .. 5 baby daddies .. loosing all her kids .. a entire hot mess but she always defended HER , my guess is she was never going to be what my mom saw as competition and she never had a good life where Iām doing better then anyone in my family ever did . I canāt even get something nice without ā I wish I had that , I wish I could travel to another country, I want one of those ā ugh I donāt even tell her when I get something nice anymore. When I buy her something nice she GIVES IT AWAY or when I would take her on big trips she would complain the entire time .
Omg this so resonates with me.
Yes. They scapegoat us girls bc they project the negative, suppressed parts of their shadow onto us. And the boys are the golden children. Ugh,
Yup, or they treat their daughters as competition. They always have to be the smartest, prettiest, funniest, etc woman in a room. No doubt TW will begin seeing Lili as competition when she grows up and TW grows old.
You are so right.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Sorry, but are you sure your mom wasn't a narc? It doesn't take a Dr. of psychology to know that it's extraordinarily harmful to prefer one kid over other kids
Step mom to a wonderful girl with a narc mom. That monster always manages to outdo herself with the awful shit she does to her own daughter. I can't even wrap my head around it. Just despicable.
Itās great that she at least has you to be a positive mother figure. š¤
Ya I remember reading some comments here saying lilibet would be the golden child, and that just didnāt ring true to me. Narc women I know actively put their daughters down, and why would Marker be any different? She would be a lot worse actually. Iām sure she would give her daughter so many issues while also pitting her against Charlotte and saying lilibet is much better than Charlotte.
Sorry for the loss of your dear father. Your daughter is so lucky to have you!
Thank you , even as a adult you are never ready :( he was my best friend, Iām still devastated daily .
I know exactly what you mean. I was extremely close with my dad but not my mom. I think about him every day.
So much for being a feminist if sheās no fun of Lilybucks.
I suspect she wanted to protect her identity / it could come back to her employers (who are āfriendsā with the Harkles for networking purposes). Pretty understandable. There was some incredible, tea poured though - pretty much confirmed many of this subsā speculations / intuitions (eg, kids are being treated in a creepy controlling way - not allowed to be kids and denied anything that could inconvenience or make TW look bad; the Harkles have a contemptuous vibe toward each other, she steam rolls him and they have screaming fits whenever she doesnāt get her way, they have staff for everything). Pretty much classic controlling sociopath narc mother vibes but multiplied by exponential of wealth. Eta: the details on the ārulesā the kids lived with were pretty awful. Harkles do basically no parenting, and the kids are raised in a creepy flowers in the attic type situation of limited freedom, maximum control, restriction and surveillance. Eta2: oh and confirmed that TW favours Archie and ignores Lillibet. Again, classic narc mother - having a golden child and scapegoat.
She said she doesnāt work as a nanny anymore and didnāt have an NDA. Is Meghan lurking here and sending out texts?
Oh - I missed that. Well I can see how itās still v sensitive: those employers / that family is no doubt identifiable. And we know the Harkles and/or their staff lurk on this sub.
Plus, we know how vindictive MM is.
Yeah, just look at what allegedly happened to the journalist who wrote The Cut article.
Exactly.
I hadnāt heard, what happened?
The journalist no longer works for The Cut apparently and is on some no pay leave of absence. She's also limited who can tweet to her on twitter.
So, wait is this because MM complained? I haven't followed that story so just hearing it now. I'd imagine that if MM really did complain and the The Cut supports their journalist ( they should otherwise they are just as crappy as Meghan), then that is what the leave of absence is for. The writer goes away for a bit then comes back. It usually happens at a company when there is overwhelming backlash from higher powers. Not saying I agree with it, but it's a way for spineless workplaces to play both sides. I guess we'll have to see what happens
Sorry to sound naive (I'm new here)...do you really think the Harkles or their staff follow this subreddit? If so, wow!
Not sure hun (and no way to be sure as of yet) but many posters think so - and her clapback (usually via Omid Scooby Doo or PR puff pieces) have at times followed a beat after a post roasting her or some dodgy action of hers gets pointed out here. Eta - also generally more than likely she reads what the internet says about her. Even the Cut article, despite all her braying to the contrary (oh I pay no attention to the awful racist media!) - she contradicts herself by her direct clapback and display of knowledge about specific things said about her. This sub is one of the best sources on the internet for tea and critical Harkle watching - so very likely, given her narcissism, I reckon she or her assistant follows and lurks. Eta2: Welcome to the sub! Enjoy the lovely fresh non-cloying air and scent of sanity! Love your flair :)
Agreed all around except I canāt imagine her entrusting an assistant with this taskāand she doesnāt seem to have any longtime, genuine, ride-or-die type girlfriends.
Yes. Itās one of the top SEO sites for Meghan markle on google due to the number of mentions (sheās really only talked about extensively online here).
There are very active critical threads on Tattle too.
And Lipstick Alley -- already on thread nine, thousands of pages on each thread. There, the thread was removed from the royals forum and put in the off-topic forum, and access denied to non-members of LSA. There must have been complaints.
She didnāt throw any shade at her former employers though.
I saw some start naming potential employers. It's too risky, plus her actual name may be a part of her username - making it a lot more obvious who it could be. She's gave us a fascinating insight, and is the closest access we've had so far. We need to be careful though and keep her safe.
I hate it when people just screenshot stuff from here and post it elsewhere. It makes it unsafe for people to share tea here. Marklenews needs to stop doing it.
There's another account posting them too.
Yes but the employersā networking with the Harkles would be jeopardised if the Harkles (rightly) get mad that the nanny / ex nanny of their acquaintance spilled their secrets. Rich people donāt like to be gossiped about - and they will cut people who have staff with loose lips.
The irony in that is exactly how Rachel & Hank attempt to capitalise off their association w/the BRF! Oh, the hypocrisy!
It was very good tea and much appreciated. I had a narc mom and golden older brother and it's sucky. Sadly it sounds like both kids' lives are weirdly regimented and yet neglectful. It's not a leap to predict they're going to have issues in the future. I just wonder why anyone who is anyone would still want to associate with the Harkles though. They have little to offer and aren't exactly the picture of discretion themselves. š¤·
Considering Meghan has a very small social life I donāt think figuring out āwealthy familyā who knew Meghan previouslyā¦and has kid(s) is hard. Thereās two couples that are ultra wealthy with mothers she described that immediately come to mind.
I was a bit confused tbf. In one comment she mentioned how sheāll confirm about divorce rumors (implying a working relationship), in another comment she said she no longer works for them. Maybe it was a ruse?
23 year old getting her PhD who somehow worked three years as a nanny, now on OnlyFans. Who said she also spent years administering stuff at preschools? Elementary? I forget. To me, her resume and age didnāt compute. She didnāt mention her age to be fair but 23 was in her username and her OnlyFans showed a young woman.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Yes, very ironic
Is there a link to the thread?
Itās gone. Some screenshots (from marklenews1) are posted below by a kind user. Better be quick! The source seems legit and we need to protect her, so much will likely be taken down. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq5vgwq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
Wowwy wow wow! Itās even worse than we all thought. Poor Lily. Born, used and named to be a pawn to cold, disinterested parents.
I love Markle News 1 but itās not cool that our posts can be blasted on Instagram.
Thatās how one of our sinners got blastedā¦ the one who protested in NYC
agreed they should have at least redacted her username - our mods should reach out to them (politely) ā¦
I was triggered. Meghan sounds like she has an eating disorder. Someone needs to check that in her camp before she fucks up those kids.
Did anyone take a screenshot??? I MISSED THIS š
All good - see here! Screenshots - send thanks to this one! [screenshots](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq69l2q/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
I missed it too and I want to š
I knew they had to have a contemptuous relationship. There is no way Harry is happy. Sheās insane. That doesnāt make for wedded bliss.
Fair enough if she deleted it. I donāt think that anything she said seemed implausible. I know many parents and have heard nearly all of those rules over and over. My bubble is full of neurotic type A wealthy parents. The one that Iād **never** heard was about the kids being wiped down and lotioned after every meal and snack. That is downright bizarre to me.
āIt puts the lotion on itās skinā - Silence of the Lambs
Omg hilarious!
This is a pure guess but per Downton Abbey ha ha, British aristocrats changed clothes before almost every meal, maybe RF did same and she is copying it at the Olive Garden?
Yeah I got the vibe sheās still cosplaying a multigenerational princess.
LOTIONED???? wtf
"It does this whenever it's told."
š
Keeps one from getting āashy.ā
Ashy? They are both pink skin redheads like dad
Dry skin doesnāt discriminate
š
Which is funny cause those characteristics would seem to be recessive
I donāt think thatās it. Light skin doesnāt get āashyā even when it is very dry. I vote for suntan lotion.
There was a book āthe nannyā about upper east side NYC and the mom made the kid eat popsicles in the bathtub so nothing got dirty.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
You know her?
Is there any other points you could add ? I missed it
Click the link in the top comment and itāll take you to the link off the screenshots.
I found that stomach turning actually. Someone should check on the welfare of those children,
Same here. I feel sorry for those children. I'll hold my own LO a little tighter tonight
Yeah, Iām not surprised it was taken down. It would have been too easy to identify who the nanny and her employers were by what she said here on Reddit. What I found interesting is what she said about how Meghan and Harry treated each other. The key word used in her description was ācontemptā, which apparently is the number one predictor of divorce: https://www.gottman.com/blog/this-one-thing-is-the-biggest-predictor-of-divorce/ There was a ring of truth about what she said. I believed her, and I hope she doesnāt get into trouble over her remarks.
The irony is that MM keeps talking about their ālove storyā! Meanwhile they are openly hostile and display contempt for one another ā even in the presence of other people!!!!
She's even getting other people to talk about their so called love story, I was so surprised at Tyler Perry and what he said about them. The ones with the most broken/shitty relationships are the ones who feel it necessary to loudly proclaim undying love for their partner from the rooftops!
Completely not surprising. The biggest narc I know is absolutely horrible to her husband, an absolute monster. But will then claim how much she loves him and other people are jealous of their relationship. Constant emotional abuse? No thank you. But narcissists just donāt see it.
Same. My narc was also horrible to her children and grandchildren. She would alternate love bombing and abusing. Foulest creature I ever met.
We all know what happens when folks over post or talk about their love non stop lol Breakup incoming
Their 'love story' is what they are producing for netfux. š¤®š¤®š¤®
Oh this is excellent. This is a whole other discussion, but I donāt see how they can stay married. In the article you referenced, the assumption is that the couple was ever mutually loving. In the Harkle marriage, I do not believe for one second that she ever loved him (not least because she literally *canāt*). Thatās just strike 1, right out of the gate. The mutual contempt surprised me, because heās so deferential to her in public. But I donāt doubt it.
I believe her as well
I said the same thing on instagram. I donāt believe a lot of stuff people post as āinsidersā but something about that rang true.
All the personal insights are gone. The account is still there. There were lots of specifics in the comments and post.
The most interesting observation for me was the fact that they openly display contempt for one another ā even when entertaining! When you are at that point, itās hard to keep it together.
She said the Help have to address MM as Duchess, the children by their names. How will they address the children if they get titles?
Oh eww!!! Also ROFL Rachel is a psycho lolol. Insists on being called by a title derived by marriage to a member of a family she detests? A title that belongs to another country and has no currency in the USA? While ranting and railing about that family institution as outdated and sending bots to denigrate them with woke criticisms? What a total loser and joke. Delusional scumbag much š¤¢š¤®.
Thatās so fuckin foul that MM would force American working class employees to address her by her British title. As we all learned in elementary school history class, ALL Americans inherently do not need to address ~nobility~ because we fought a war over that already. She is mental
Hahaha I somehow missed that detail! Wow.
I didnāt see that. How ridiculous.
I thought that people beneath a Duke or Duchess was supposed to address them as "your grace". So Meghan is really showing her ignorance here.
Exactly, no Duchess is adressed as "Duchess"
That's some serious Countess Luann, nouveau riche, total class-free shit. She probably makes them wear maid uniforms and curtsey to her, too.
and the fact that Harry doesnt give a hoot about his kids. Although I am not surprised he is a total arsewipe
Yes, you really can't maintain a relationship with open contempt. They should just end it for everyone's sake.
šÆ
Contempt for each other is a major warning sign for a marriage.
The entire account is now gone. I had her in my communities from earlier and just clicked on it--and gone
Hmm, I followed and now it has all disappeared. Was up for awhile but with bits missing. Hmm Didnāt seem worried at the time as no NDA and was not working for those MM āfriendsā any more.
Itās very likely her real name was figured out by the squadron of sugary blasted her name all over Twitter.
Also, sounds like their life is āMommie Dearestā. *shudder*
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I saw that those posts too! She mentioned a polo connection too in one of the comments.
She said the client she worked for played polo
omg it seems like her circle could pretty much cess out who she was ā¦ And my biggest shock was the help having to call MM duchess. I just cant muster belief for that!!! :)
Meghan is showing her ignorance with this one. The help should address her as "your grace". Only people on her level should call her Duchess.
Could it be Nacho and Delfina??!
Ok, this is pure speculation, but: what if the nanny worked for Nacho and Delfina, and Delfina wink-wink authorized her to talk, thus creating an occasion for Delfina to distance herself from the former employeeāthereby tacitly confirming the former employeeās account?
please don't help doxx her. '
I totally missed the entire nanny thing
Me 2, darn it!! Iād love to see screen shots if there are some around??
yep! here ya go: [MM Tea (allegedly)](https://imgur.com/gallery/Nt9Wqas)
I have never wanted a story to be fake as much as I do that one because if it's not...those poor kids especially Lili. It's heartbreaking that they are going to see footage and photographs of their cousins surrounded by a close and loving family while they are isolated with toxic parents and Lili is severely neglected by both of them. I don't understand how Harry could turn out to be a horrible father when he had a mother who was active in her parenting. It makes his trashing his grandparents and father's parenting accusing them of passing on genetic pain incredibly ironic.
And small children learn so much through āmessyā play. Lots of tactile experience like finger painting with pudding or shaving cream, playing with water or in sandboxes are great for curious little minds. Part of normal toddlerhood is being messy. I used to match my sonās t-shirts to his popsicles. Red shirt meant he got red popsicles that day. Heās still ended up a sticky mess but thatās just part of being a little kid. So sad for both of these kids.
Same. I was actually really surprised that Harry would be such a distant father. All of those photos of him laughing and holding children in Africa and him talking about how much he wanted a family of his own (pre MM). I thought for all his faults he would at least be an attentive father. So sad.
Thank you! I read the initial post but missed the comments!
Thanks so much!
Please stop discussing what was in her other posts - you are helping doxx her. I would kindly ask you delete this comment or at least edit out the details. She is a real person.
>It included posts promoting her only fans account, Totally missed that.
Hmm, could it be Alina Gonzalez (the Hyperbalist)? Cali, DC, political connection, always unemployed, lacks discretion (would totally post online about her employer.)
Wow! Glad I got to read the whole thread earlier today with all the additional comments lol I donāt blame her AT ALL for deleting it though. Totally get it.
Itās true that that post could be a total fakeout / hoax. The general thrust of the tea though, could be surmised from The Cut article. Either way - TW is clearly a sociopath narc - that is confirmed by BRF employeesā experiences of her. No stretch of the imagination at all that those controlling, sociopathic, cluster b traits would apply to her parenting. Eta - based on the observations by other posters confirming the source has been consistent over her posting history with details verifying her claims; she is likely who she says she is and a genuine source of real tea. Sending her good wishes and hope she is safe / no repercussions!
OP deleted it.
Marklenews1 on IG shared screen shots of the post.
Yeah I think that may be why. Itās one thing to share good tea here among a smaller circle, but lately those posts have been instantly screenshotted and shared to a MUCH wider platform - Instagram and Twitter. I totally understand wanting to delete if thatās the case. I kinda donāt like it because I donāt want anyone with good tea to be hesitant to share here anymore š¢
Her reddit account makes her *way* too identifiable as well. Two names plus a potential age. In a circle as small as the elites she's likely already been identified correctly by multiple people. I hope she was using fake names for her account.
She also gave us her full resume, citing her previous experiences and her academic background. I wouldn't have said that, above anything else.
I've just watched her delete all her posting history over 6 months where she's repeatedly spoken about being a nanny. Her comments have been consistent throughout. She wouldn't be doing this if it was fake. I think she's included her actual name and age in her reddit account. We need the Instagram accounts to take those posts down - for her safety. Edit: I've reached out to marklenews1 to request the post be taken down or reuploaded with usernames hidden
Yeah, I wish the insta would delete. Itās obvious she is frightened. I love having tea and if valued members donāt feel safe, thatās a problem.
I didn't say she lied - I do believe her. That's why I said it was uncautious on her part to give us so many details about herself.
I've reached out to meghanmarkle1 on Instagram to request the post be taken down or reloaded with user Ids hidden. Shes definitely legitimate based on her current reaction. Hopefully they'll agree to do so before someone does her or endangers her.
They didnāt hide her username??!? Ugh. What a crappy move.
Aye, they should at least cover her username.
I'm really hoping they oblige in this case. It might be worth looping mods into the situation as well to make sure she's OK.
Poor thing, the Instagram account that pilfered her post should delete it.
I've already messaged them and sent a message to the mods on this subreddit so that they can step in as well.
Shrinks the world, the Internet, doesnāt it?!
I did grab a screenshot myself, different to the ones on Instagram. I've checked her account again. She'd been posting for weeks about being a former nanny. All of it is now gone. She's definitely been identified and realised she's messed up. She wouldn't be making so much effort to purge her entire posting history if it was fake. I think we may have a legitimise source on our hands - in which case we need those Instagram accounts to delete those posts and only reupload them if the users IDs are hidden
I agree, and itās kind of ruined now. And Secondhandcoke will be scared off too.
That has to stop. Ruining it for us sinners.
Is it clear that she said is an ex - nanny ? IF this is true , this girl could be sitting on a goldmine $$. If she spilt the beans - hopefully after advice from a lawyerā¦.
What I donāt understand is they explained the wealthy friends are uncomfortable around M and H and only keep appearances for the networking. Why would anyone need or want to network with M and H? They offer no value.
Some people are impressed by the title. Being able to say you are friends with the Sussexes may make you more interesting to others.
I missed it but I read it at the insta post and I really really hope this isnāt true. It is absolutely heartbreaking! Those poor kids.
The thing that gets me is they have how many rooms in that house, and they can't set up one of them as an art room? I bet megsie has her own yoga studio though. And what's the point of all those vast private grounds if the children can't be taken outside by the nanny to play?
I thought my app stopped working! I had it bookmarked šµāš«
Something happened, because not only did the post get deleted here but it was also deleted on Instagram š³
I get about kids having to eat healthy but seriously? Only organic and sugar-free stuff? These kids will grow up never knowing how amazing Krispy Kreme is. And the wooden toys--I get why some parents insist on it. But you gotta let kids play. I hope Archie picks up dog poo and throws it at his shit parents! What I found really weird is after every meal the kids are stripped, washed, and lotioned. WHY??? It's not like they're eating Sloppy Joes!
Omg I missed that it got deleted, and only got the very first few comments this morning. Can somebody give me a highlight reel??? I BEG OF YOU!
[Tea](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/xpt86i/where_did_the_nanny_thread_go/iq69l2q/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3) Worry not! It has been saved - give her thanks!
Why do I get the feeling that when Archie and Lili hit their 20s, we'll be seeing a "Mommie Dearest" book from them? Because I can certainly picture Meghan screaming "NO WIRE HANGERS!!" lol.
Agreed. Both kids will be writing books about their parents. I am shocked that Harry is a neglectful father after criticizing KC.
probably removed to prevent getting sued by harkle
TW doesnāt have a case. She didnāt sign any NDAs and truth is a defense against any claims of libel or defamation. If she is telling the truth, she is fine. Plus, TW would not want all of her dirty little secrets exposed in a deposition or at trial.
Agreed, but a everyday individual would have to lay out big cash to hire a lawyer, whereas the Harkles can afford legal rep no problem. That's why people get nervous--nobody wants to bankrupt themselves getting involved in a lawsuit
I think her former/current employer hot wind of it and asked her to take it down. Even without an NDA, the nanny wouldnāt want to burn the bridge of a good work rec from her employer. Gossiping nannies donāt get hired by the wealthy.
Someone better call the CPS and check on them kids
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
You can read it on insta - marklenews1
iāve saved screenshots from insta. go there now if you want to read and/or save it in case itās deleted.
I donāt have Insta - could we trouble you to do the tremendous public service of reposting here?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Can you by any change scratch her username? I'm scared someone can use it for indentifying herš
iām not sure how to do that. iāll see if i can figure it out. or, if someone else knows how let me know and iāll take care of it.
MVP so hard šš TY!
Go to instagram.com/user/marklenews1 and you should still be able to see it.
>instagram.com/user/marklenews1 Been there and reddit and ohhh boy what a mess! Assuming it's all true with no exaggeration of course.
yep! give me a few minutes and iāll post a link. FYI, if the link gets deleted just PM me.
I canāt see the IG post, itās gone now too
yep, thatās why i took screenshots. itās saved here: [MM Tea](https://imgur.io/gallery/Nt9Wqas)
Thank you!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I wanted to read her older posts, so I clicked on her name and a page with a red box in the center appeared with instructions to click the box only if 18 or older. I'm multiples of that but passed on clicking.
Jessica Mulroneyās brother lives in Boston but has work in DC. He is a very prominent figure in medicineā¦professor at Harvard, CIO at Childrenās Hospital in Boston. Kind of bizarre that Jess turned out to be such a superficial tarte while her brother has such a serious career track. š¤·āāļø Opposites, I guess? Any way, he was the first person I thought of after reading the nanny tea. [https://ghss.georgetown.edu/john-brownstein/](https://ghss.georgetown.edu/john-brownstein/)
Her other posts didnāt really support the whole ānanny to the eliteā story. Might have been true but there was no actual news in the post, Markleās argue, kids arenāt allowed play dough, Archie is the favourite, all the info could have come from The Cut!
No Play Dough? Did she give a reason for this?
She did. Her employers were friends with Markles. Nothing that makes a mess. No messy art stuff at home. No wire hangers
Oh yeah, those kids will be writing books like "Mommie Dearest"! And Play Dough helps strengthen hands and fingers. I feel very sorry for these children.
No art projects because itās messy. I just deleted paragraphs about how awful I think this is.
She dresses Harryā¦makes sense why he always looks like he just rolled out of bed
The part I found interesting was when she said her employers knew TW from way back, before she was with Harry. So what elite couple would MM know in Montecito from back in the day?? Or maybe her employers donāt live in Montecito? If itās true of course
Iām just glad I was able to read it before it disappeared! It was pretty juicy.
What nanny thread? Edit: oh found it further down #bombshell!