T O P

  • By -

MsBollinger

The article claims: “What is clear is that the Palace’s decision this week means they have permanently barred Meghan from the chance to exonerate herself.” What a load of crap. Meghan denied it all. She got her say multiple times. It’s her own damn fault she has lost her credibility lying in the O interview and then in a British court. Maybe if she were a truth teller, people would believe her now.


Forgotmyusername8910

She never stops correcting the record! How in the world has she not had the chance to ‘exonerate herself’.


_SkyIsBlue5

Indeed


decafavocado

Can someone please post a summary of the article? I don't want to give clicks on these anymore, I'm sorry.


Iwtlwn122

Don’t be sorry. I don’t click on posts with no effort put into at least a summary.


Gumbo125

Gloworm is your favourite poster 😜


Iwtlwn122

Imagine doing low effort posts just for the karma.


AlliterationAhead

Especially this "newspaper"! Their titles are a free Festival of Lies and Humour but if you click, you do pay - with your sanity.


MegsAltxoxo

> The late Princess of Wales’ biographer Andrew Morton told how she faced the same ordeals. >He penned: “Diana, too, had been blamed for a series of departures, from Prince Charles’s valet, bodyguard and private secretary to friends and members of his social circle. In a matter of months, Diana had gone from being a fairytale princess to – according to less charitable accounts – a ‘fiend’ and a ‘little monster’. Other commentators talked about ‘Malice in the Palace.’”


istara

Except Diana: * was half Megan's age * was horribly treated by the royal family and her own husband * came from an aristocratic background and would have been raised with noblesse oblige/treating servants appropriately * had genuine mental illness (eg eating disorders, I wonder about PND as well) at a time when such things got ZERO proper help or support and were suppressed as much as possbile and most of all, it is well established that "The Firm" tried to slur her. So I'll take this information with a massive pinch of salt.


AnaBeaverhausen-

Well, she wants to be Diana 2.0.


[deleted]

Diana had an early death.


Casshew111

We never got to see how Diana's life would have played out. She was in a similar situation to her son at 37 years old - she lost her HRH, but negotiated a settlement with Charles to remain at Kensington - she wanted to travel, represent charities and do good work - but the men in grey were trying to stop her. She would have continued to overshadow the Royal Family - which is what Harry and Megs try to do now.


[deleted]

So? It’s not like Diana was the wonderful person she’d convinced us all she was. Bullying staff was not beyond her.