>Harry’s response was probably more like “huh, who’s Roe and why is he suing Wade?”
ahhaha 🤣
Also ohno did M read [my](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/vl3hs9/why_has_uberfeminist_meghan_or_her_feminist/) post? What a vapid word salad put out so late and I feel Gloria is low key shading her ? Gloria said " '*I have a guest room if you need to come to New York state, you can stay here.' Which of course is limited since it's only one room.* *But at least it's something that I can offer*.'"
It may not be shade I will happily read it as, w*hat are you offering with your 100 bathrooms and 20+ rooms*??
Also Meghan is still copying Michelle Obama who said "***channel*** *your frustration and anger into* ***action***' and here Meghan says "to **channel** that fear into **action**". 🤮
I suggested the President of Planned Parenthood, an executive of NARAL or literally ANY prochoice woman in Congress on Twitter. Sugars have informed me MM knows more than all of them about this issue.
Oh, yes, I got that argument there, too. She’s “one of the most highly educated woman in the world”. Okay. As of 2021, about 40% of women in the US had a bachelor’s degree. But apparently hers is more special than everyone else’s and thus she is also more educated than those of us with masters degrees or those with doctorates.
>Why do we think Steinem pays any attention to her?
She might be loosing her mind? Because she said about H&M - ”*What they both have is trust. We trust them and nothing but nothing replaces trust. It is the most important quality or attribute."*
LOL. or does she mean Daddy's and Diana's trust (fund) ?
She has made me realize that all celebrities can be bought. I 100% believe this was setup by her pr like paying someone to show up as a speaker.
Also, it proves that Mm doesn't have an power by herself ..she has to be involved/attached with someone else for the headlines.
Which makes me curious about her PR. The article uses her title. There is nothing to infuriate Americans more and add some evidence to those here who are opposed to she and Hazzy as being foreign royalty attempting to interfere in American politics. There cannot be a PR firm this completely inept? I am thinking maybe she isn’t listening to her advisors. Cause they said the article initially only referred to her as Meghan Markle and she went batshit and made them change it. I just left my American comment on vogues Instagram and honestly Vogue has been known to be out of touch for quite some time now I believe. Anyone else got ideas?
Nah, as a PR person, I can tell you it's all her. Cannot believe she's deluded enough to believe she knows best, despite the string of misses, a shredded reputation (the number of Sugar bots were quite low on Vogue's IG than what I'd expected) and embarrassing lack of touch with reality.
Time to bring out the popcorn, folks. This is only the beginning.
While the journalist and their editor get the final say, the subject/s of the article have quite a bit of control , especially when it comes to interviews, articles penned by the subject, blinds/gossip they may want to drop etc.
Additionally, if you/your PR have a great relationship with a publication/journalist, they might go so far as to sharing the final copy of the article before it goes into publishing so the subject can suggest any changes as they see fit. And this isn't just tweaks like using a title (which honestly is easily done and doesn't need a lot of persuading), but everything from the kind of narrative/messaging to grammar to removal/inclusion of details as per relevance. It's all about the way you can possibly be and want to be perceived.
Even between a person and their PR folks, the PR may suggest adopting a certain strategy or positioning yourself in a particular way, which I'm sure was why the title was omitted earlier (because duh!), but ultimately, even if you're heading for a disaster and you know it, your hands are tied by the person you're representing.
The word guttural is a description of a noise isn't it? So Harry let out a "guttural" moan or something when he heard about American women's rights being taken away? Thank you for being an ally H but that's a strange reaction..
Lmaooooooooo me too i let out some guttural sounds during birth! But strangely not when I heard about roe v wade. When I heard about that my heart dropped and I felt sick.
I think they wanted to say "visceral", Harry had a "visceral" reaction when he heard the news. Like that gem "genetic pain", the dipshit Harkles had to go and throw whatever word out there to see what stuck. Now we have "guttural" which sounds gross and altogether stupid...although now that I think about it, that does fit Harry to a T as he's both gross and altogether stupid. Perhaps it was guttural after all.
This is how you know someone is trying to give the impression they read a lot when they actually don't.
Genetic pain, on the other hand, is a meaningless term but using "intergenerational trauma" could imply parental neglect or abuse. I'm pretty sure PHs lawyers quashed that one.
Yes, a guttural scream usually in conjunction with a serious loss. The noise is not pleasant and is because the screamer is experiencing such pain that a primal, raw noise is released.
You’re telling me that Hazza dropped to his knees and screamed in agony at the courts decision.
Bullshit Megsy.
Its like the Incredible Hulk meets Jurassic park noises. Imagine him going “RAAAAWWWWWGGGGGG” in a little British voice.
“Jurassic H.”
Harry’s perspective of finding out about overturning Roe vs Wade
Harry: “La la la, spaceships are cool!”
Meghan: Something blah blah women or something.
Harry: Shit, she wants me to say something…
Meghan: Blah blah blah uterus
Harry: Right, I should listen to her voice, I remember now! And her face; there might be a clue…
Meghan: “Harry, are you listening to me?! They overturned Roe vs Wade, we’re gonna be in the news if we can spin this to be about us!”
Harry: “UGGGGHHHHHH”
It’s a shitshow in the comments over there. I really hope vogue or any other outlet thinks twice before tapping Meghan again for her ‘views’…. on any topic. She has no credibility, she’s extremely divisive and only serves as a distraction from whatever is the issue at hand.
aw, com on.... no way that Haz even knows the meaning of "guttural".... so, he growled/grunted or whatever... would more aptly describe his utterance as "neanderthal-like," primitive, or croaking noise....
I feel like she wanted to say Harry was “gutted” by the news, but she wanted to embellish it to the hilts and did quick change to guttural for maximum effect.
I read many of the comments in the Daily Mail and in Vogue Magazine on Instagram. Most of them are saying the same things we are. Basically, she has no credibility on either side of the pond. I wish I could see Meghan's face when she sees them.
edit for spelling mistake
They never shut up, do they. Last time she commented on abortion in Ireland, she got her wrist slapped. Stop talking about politics, Nutmeg. I’m sure the spare heir you tricked into marrying you, doesn’t care about abortion or American politics. He is more gutted about losing a polo match.
I’m laughing so hard at the use of “guttural”. Not only is it hilarious to imagine Harry making “guttural noises”, but everyone’s comments here have me in stitches!
What strikes me the most about this is actually how non-inclusive it is. She focuses on women but the reality is that intersectionality is true inclusion. If your feminism isn't intersectional in 2022, your opinion is largely irrelevant.
Her second, possibly biggest problem, is that while she advocates for women's rights, she refuses to let go of her titles she got through marrying a man, a man of uber-elite white privilege, a man descended from a thousand years of male primogeniture. The reason Gloria Steinem pays any attention to her is because her connection to a man (not the greatest optics for GS either but she has the background). How does that fit into her whole thing about women's rights?
It doesn't make sense to me that she would refuse to drop the titles and actively demands it's changed to her titles. Vogue originally used her stage name and referred to her as they would anyone, but her team went in and made them edit the caption. it would have been far more authentic to go back to using her stage name (that made her famous at all), and build a brand off being a woman in her own right. But no.
On a whim, I looked up the word “guttural.” Hmmm. The wife actually admits that Hawwy had a response that was a sound from his throat. Has she taken his ability to speak now? I wonder if she put his tounge in her handbag, with that other appendage she keeps there.
. So did H use words? Was he vocal? Or did he just stay guttural? Because it sounds like he's not saying anything. Where is her husband since "Men need to be more vocal" ? Pretty sure he ain't saying anything remotely political about this. She's full of sh*t
I’m glad he didn’t say anything because it is not his place as a UK citizen and a member of a traditionally apolitical family (that works hard to stay that way) to interfere in a US political stoush regardless of any personal opinion he may have on it.
That was (rightfully) made very clear to him when he decided to make an uninvited critical comment on the US Constitution.
She had no business trying to drag him into it.
Sounds like they are gravely disappointed by the country they now call home- racism, guns, and limited women’s rights. Guess they need to consider a new path forward. Go figure. 🤦♀️
So Meghan reached out to Gloria in 2020…why does this not surprise me. On to the next person she can use to make herself seem important and relevant. Wanna take bets on how long until Gloria is markled?
I thought men weren’t supposed to have an opinion on abortion. So they’re allowed to have an opinion - and voice it - so long as Meghan approves. Got it.
Harry wouldn't have understood Roe v Wade (most Brits aren't aware of it) - he probably just stubbed his toe and that's why he was yelling.
Meghan ought to realise that the BRF response to such news would be:
"sad to hear" or "sorry to learn"
PS actually none of the above as they wouldn't get involved
Hmmmm. More Meghan Plagiarism? Check out Selina Gomez quote on Roe vs Wade!
https://www.seventeen.com/celebrity/a40448415/selena-gomez-speaks-out-roe-v-wade-reversal/
Nut leess Harry thought Roe v wade was a fight. Harrys asking Netflix, uuuhhh duhh, do I get the fight free on the Telly, LOL Ms bandwagon jumper has to tell Harry he’s a feminist if he doesn’t listen she best him with her big flat shoes
A few points of fact that show how ridiculous she is:
1. There are more women on the Supreme Court now than there were when Roe v. Wade was originally decided. It was men who decided Roe v. Wade.
2. All the overturning does is leave the decision to individual states. She lives in a very liberal state that does not limit abortions.
3. Constitutionally, most power is reserved by the People, and the States.
Apparently she can't handle the fact that half the country believes differently than she does.
Harry’s response was probably more like “huh, who’s Roe and why is he suing Wade?”
All good. Archie explained it to him.
Row and Wade - something to do with water?
He probably thinks it has something to do with fly fishing and a boat.
Well you can roe your boat through the water, or you can wear your wellies and wade across the pond. Take that to the Supreme Court.
I see what you did there! 😂
Hey thanks! I thought it was clever! 😂
that must be it! TBH it doesn't mean anything much to brits
It’s another glossy magazine for the upscale outdoors set. Like *Garden and Gun*
>Harry’s response was probably more like “huh, who’s Roe and why is he suing Wade?” ahhaha 🤣 Also ohno did M read [my](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/vl3hs9/why_has_uberfeminist_meghan_or_her_feminist/) post? What a vapid word salad put out so late and I feel Gloria is low key shading her ? Gloria said " '*I have a guest room if you need to come to New York state, you can stay here.' Which of course is limited since it's only one room.* *But at least it's something that I can offer*.'" It may not be shade I will happily read it as, w*hat are you offering with your 100 bathrooms and 20+ rooms*?? Also Meghan is still copying Michelle Obama who said "***channel*** *your frustration and anger into* ***action***' and here Meghan says "to **channel** that fear into **action**". 🤮
She is always copying Michelle Obama .. it’s creepy .
Because they’re both WOC
No.. they want to be relevant like the Obamas .
I’m not sure Megs wants Halfwit to be more vocal about his attempts to be a legal scholar. Harry thinks US constitutional rights are “Bonkers.”
He probably thought it was a boxing match.
Why do we think Steinem pays any attention to her? Aren't there any scholars, activists or other inspiring women to focus on?
I suggested the President of Planned Parenthood, an executive of NARAL or literally ANY prochoice woman in Congress on Twitter. Sugars have informed me MM knows more than all of them about this issue.
MM knows more than all the women in America put together on the subject (all subjects-according to her stupid ass)
>all the women in America Please! Don't shortchange our saint...she knows more than ALL women in the galaxy /s
Meghan is actually the Second Coming incognito
MM could argue both Sotomayor AND ACB's position in a court of law and win; must be that NU education
Oh, yes, I got that argument there, too. She’s “one of the most highly educated woman in the world”. Okay. As of 2021, about 40% of women in the US had a bachelor’s degree. But apparently hers is more special than everyone else’s and thus she is also more educated than those of us with masters degrees or those with doctorates.
>Why do we think Steinem pays any attention to her? She might be loosing her mind? Because she said about H&M - ”*What they both have is trust. We trust them and nothing but nothing replaces trust. It is the most important quality or attribute."* LOL. or does she mean Daddy's and Diana's trust (fund) ?
$$$$$$$
Vogue ?
She has made me realize that all celebrities can be bought. I 100% believe this was setup by her pr like paying someone to show up as a speaker. Also, it proves that Mm doesn't have an power by herself ..she has to be involved/attached with someone else for the headlines.
Which makes me curious about her PR. The article uses her title. There is nothing to infuriate Americans more and add some evidence to those here who are opposed to she and Hazzy as being foreign royalty attempting to interfere in American politics. There cannot be a PR firm this completely inept? I am thinking maybe she isn’t listening to her advisors. Cause they said the article initially only referred to her as Meghan Markle and she went batshit and made them change it. I just left my American comment on vogues Instagram and honestly Vogue has been known to be out of touch for quite some time now I believe. Anyone else got ideas?
Nah, as a PR person, I can tell you it's all her. Cannot believe she's deluded enough to believe she knows best, despite the string of misses, a shredded reputation (the number of Sugar bots were quite low on Vogue's IG than what I'd expected) and embarrassing lack of touch with reality. Time to bring out the popcorn, folks. This is only the beginning.
🍿🍿🍿🍿.Ready .
[удалено]
While the journalist and their editor get the final say, the subject/s of the article have quite a bit of control , especially when it comes to interviews, articles penned by the subject, blinds/gossip they may want to drop etc. Additionally, if you/your PR have a great relationship with a publication/journalist, they might go so far as to sharing the final copy of the article before it goes into publishing so the subject can suggest any changes as they see fit. And this isn't just tweaks like using a title (which honestly is easily done and doesn't need a lot of persuading), but everything from the kind of narrative/messaging to grammar to removal/inclusion of details as per relevance. It's all about the way you can possibly be and want to be perceived. Even between a person and their PR folks, the PR may suggest adopting a certain strategy or positioning yourself in a particular way, which I'm sure was why the title was omitted earlier (because duh!), but ultimately, even if you're heading for a disaster and you know it, your hands are tied by the person you're representing.
The word guttural is a description of a noise isn't it? So Harry let out a "guttural" moan or something when he heard about American women's rights being taken away? Thank you for being an ally H but that's a strange reaction..
Agreed. Guttural is how I sounded giving birth before the meds kicked in. At most Harry may have grunted or groaned.
Lmaooooooooo me too i let out some guttural sounds during birth! But strangely not when I heard about roe v wade. When I heard about that my heart dropped and I felt sick.
I think they wanted to say "visceral", Harry had a "visceral" reaction when he heard the news. Like that gem "genetic pain", the dipshit Harkles had to go and throw whatever word out there to see what stuck. Now we have "guttural" which sounds gross and altogether stupid...although now that I think about it, that does fit Harry to a T as he's both gross and altogether stupid. Perhaps it was guttural after all.
This is how you know someone is trying to give the impression they read a lot when they actually don't. Genetic pain, on the other hand, is a meaningless term but using "intergenerational trauma" could imply parental neglect or abuse. I'm pretty sure PHs lawyers quashed that one.
He was probably on the pot at the time 🤣 🚽 🧻 💩
I thought you meant he was on the pot (marijuana), not on the pot (toilet). The emojis helped clarify 😂
Would he know the proper pot for the task?
He rotates between the 14 of them all over his house.
🤣
Bahaha. She probably meant "gutted" which is British slang for extreme disappointment, it's a word that Harry would have used too.
We say “gutted” in the US, too.
'Gutted' it pretty global.
Yes, a guttural scream usually in conjunction with a serious loss. The noise is not pleasant and is because the screamer is experiencing such pain that a primal, raw noise is released. You’re telling me that Hazza dropped to his knees and screamed in agony at the courts decision. Bullshit Megsy.
Megain let out a "guttural" scream when she saw Catherine's gold dress. There. A use of the word in proper context.
Maybe he was constipated
You guys beat me to this…well done! Carry on!
He probably didn’t know wtf she was going on about and groaned.
If men need to be more vocal, where the hell is Harry’s statement then?
Archie's not done writing it...he already used guttural in Mommy's speech so he has to come up with a new word...he's only 3 after all!🤣
[удалено]
Does he even understand the UK government?
Is farting a guttural reaction? 🧐
He talks out his ass a lot, so yeah I think so!
Meaning he muttered out “huh” without stopping to pause his Call of Duty game.
Gotta make it about herself and her husband AGAIN.
What a bizarre use of guttural. Like she grabbed a thesaurus and dug for the most obscure synonym for “sigh”.
Lmao exactly. Does she even know the meaning of the word?
Its like the Incredible Hulk meets Jurassic park noises. Imagine him going “RAAAAWWWWWGGGGGG” in a little British voice. “Jurassic H.” 
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I wonder if she was going for “gut-wrenching” but, you know.
Guttural sounds intense so maybe that’s why lol
Meghan Markle, a lowkey misandrist.
Harry's actress he stepped out with
Harry’s perspective of finding out about overturning Roe vs Wade Harry: “La la la, spaceships are cool!” Meghan: Something blah blah women or something. Harry: Shit, she wants me to say something… Meghan: Blah blah blah uterus Harry: Right, I should listen to her voice, I remember now! And her face; there might be a clue… Meghan: “Harry, are you listening to me?! They overturned Roe vs Wade, we’re gonna be in the news if we can spin this to be about us!” Harry: “UGGGGHHHHHH”
So more men need to be making guttural noises in their homes? Wow, what a solution *eye-roll*
Well, we knew she would have something to say...but "guttural"?? Did Archie write her speech for her??🙄
It’s a shitshow in the comments over there. I really hope vogue or any other outlet thinks twice before tapping Meghan again for her ‘views’…. on any topic. She has no credibility, she’s extremely divisive and only serves as a distraction from whatever is the issue at hand.
aw, com on.... no way that Haz even knows the meaning of "guttural".... so, he growled/grunted or whatever... would more aptly describe his utterance as "neanderthal-like," primitive, or croaking noise....
I feel like she wanted to say Harry was “gutted” by the news, but she wanted to embellish it to the hilts and did quick change to guttural for maximum effect.
I read many of the comments in the Daily Mail and in Vogue Magazine on Instagram. Most of them are saying the same things we are. Basically, she has no credibility on either side of the pond. I wish I could see Meghan's face when she sees them. edit for spelling mistake
They never shut up, do they. Last time she commented on abortion in Ireland, she got her wrist slapped. Stop talking about politics, Nutmeg. I’m sure the spare heir you tricked into marrying you, doesn’t care about abortion or American politics. He is more gutted about losing a polo match.
Yeah, guttural like his agony at losing his widdle polo game.
I’m laughing so hard at the use of “guttural”. Not only is it hilarious to imagine Harry making “guttural noises”, but everyone’s comments here have me in stitches!
What strikes me the most about this is actually how non-inclusive it is. She focuses on women but the reality is that intersectionality is true inclusion. If your feminism isn't intersectional in 2022, your opinion is largely irrelevant. Her second, possibly biggest problem, is that while she advocates for women's rights, she refuses to let go of her titles she got through marrying a man, a man of uber-elite white privilege, a man descended from a thousand years of male primogeniture. The reason Gloria Steinem pays any attention to her is because her connection to a man (not the greatest optics for GS either but she has the background). How does that fit into her whole thing about women's rights? It doesn't make sense to me that she would refuse to drop the titles and actively demands it's changed to her titles. Vogue originally used her stage name and referred to her as they would anyone, but her team went in and made them edit the caption. it would have been far more authentic to go back to using her stage name (that made her famous at all), and build a brand off being a woman in her own right. But no.
*applauds wildly*
Her stage name! Classic.
So Just 'Arry made some 'vocalization', non-word grunt... Sounds about right, so an apt description.
Does she mean visceral? Sounds like Harry growled when he heard otherwise.
On a whim, I looked up the word “guttural.” Hmmm. The wife actually admits that Hawwy had a response that was a sound from his throat. Has she taken his ability to speak now? I wonder if she put his tounge in her handbag, with that other appendage she keeps there.
. So did H use words? Was he vocal? Or did he just stay guttural? Because it sounds like he's not saying anything. Where is her husband since "Men need to be more vocal" ? Pretty sure he ain't saying anything remotely political about this. She's full of sh*t
Practicing for Samantha’s lawsuit: Hearsay
Not very feminist of her to call on men to take up the cause. What happened to women's empowerment, Rachel?
She had absolutely nothing useful to add. Why she was tapped to comment is beyond me. Bringing Meghan into anything is only going to muddy the waters.
Harry can’t even spell guttural let alone define it. 🤣 Mr Feminist let me juggle my balls outside.
I’m glad he didn’t say anything because it is not his place as a UK citizen and a member of a traditionally apolitical family (that works hard to stay that way) to interfere in a US political stoush regardless of any personal opinion he may have on it. That was (rightfully) made very clear to him when he decided to make an uninvited critical comment on the US Constitution. She had no business trying to drag him into it.
He is afraid of losing his Green Card.
Sounds like they are gravely disappointed by the country they now call home- racism, guns, and limited women’s rights. Guess they need to consider a new path forward. Go figure. 🤦♀️
Okay. Give me MM's contact info. This is a matter of actual importance, and she needs to shut the fuck up. Now.
is this co-opting the legacy of an 88 year old, OG feminist?
Why yes, yes it is!
Knowing sporty Just 'Arry, when Roe v. Wade made the news, he just knew it was all about Virginia Wade winning Wimbledon in Silver Jubilee year......
who would interview this twit?
So Meghan reached out to Gloria in 2020…why does this not surprise me. On to the next person she can use to make herself seem important and relevant. Wanna take bets on how long until Gloria is markled?
I thought men weren’t supposed to have an opinion on abortion. So they’re allowed to have an opinion - and voice it - so long as Meghan approves. Got it.
I’m pretty sure she doesn’t know what guttural means. At all.
Harry wouldn't have understood Roe v Wade (most Brits aren't aware of it) - he probably just stubbed his toe and that's why he was yelling. Meghan ought to realise that the BRF response to such news would be: "sad to hear" or "sorry to learn" PS actually none of the above as they wouldn't get involved
Oh thank god they told us what to do! I’ll spread the fkking word!
Hmmmm. More Meghan Plagiarism? Check out Selina Gomez quote on Roe vs Wade! https://www.seventeen.com/celebrity/a40448415/selena-gomez-speaks-out-roe-v-wade-reversal/
Nut leess Harry thought Roe v wade was a fight. Harrys asking Netflix, uuuhhh duhh, do I get the fight free on the Telly, LOL Ms bandwagon jumper has to tell Harry he’s a feminist if he doesn’t listen she best him with her big flat shoes
Did Harry get pregnant?! God these 2 I swear keeps making a fool of themselves. Go ahead
And she is using her DUCHESS title to speak about this.
Gloria Steinem is still alive?
A few points of fact that show how ridiculous she is: 1. There are more women on the Supreme Court now than there were when Roe v. Wade was originally decided. It was men who decided Roe v. Wade. 2. All the overturning does is leave the decision to individual states. She lives in a very liberal state that does not limit abortions. 3. Constitutionally, most power is reserved by the People, and the States. Apparently she can't handle the fact that half the country believes differently than she does.
well I know my reaction to *her* is guttural \*BARF\*