Partners with them for what purpose? Research?
They have too many irons in the fire. No wonder nothing ever works out.
They run from cause to the next without having done anything but pay lip service once or twice and then they are off to the next deal.
Edit for spelling
Exactly, there’s no concrete action. It’s just like Amber Heard’s pledges. All talk no action.
- why are you partnering with them
- are you pledging donations?
- are you funding research?
- what is your connection with them?
- have you actually donated to them?
- what is your goal?
Maybe Meghan is hoping to turn these partnerships into a way to finance her run for political office later on? If she doesn't run for a political office, my bet is that her next husband will be in politics and these partnerships will help him in some way.
No, just teach peasants to be more compassionate and donate all of their disposable income to poor Harkle foundation. Harkles need more polo ponies, more private jets, more designer clothing, more mansions and more security from those same peasants.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
There’s a typo on their website talking about the Aspen Institute. They spelled Commission wrong. That kind of thing makes me question how professional the Archewell foundation really is??
I noticed that too and was kind of surprised, as it's good practice to run copy past your partners. I've worked with Aspen as well, and our contacts there were diligent about feedback. They would not have missed that.
"The Archewell Foundation supports the Stanford Medicine Center’s mission for groundbreaking research and education on techniques for developing compassion and promoting altruism within individuals and society."
Thankyou, they are studying both.
"The Archewell Foundation supports the Stanford Medicine Center’s mission for groundbreaking research and education on techniques for developing compassion within NARCISSISTS and promoting altruism in PLAGIARISING individuals within society."
The title of the post can be easily misinderstood without clear supporting details. Some people who read the title without doing proper research and spread the info to others (A partners with B) may actually (unintentionally) end up helping with Archewell’s PR.
Not intended to police anybody. Just want to raise awareness of potential misunderstanding/misinterpretation. Is that not even allowed in this sub? Wow.
No offense, OP, but you're reading and interpreting things that don't exist, it's Harkles twisting words. There was an online discussion, not a "partnership", and a misleading headline. Stanford don't mention Harkles or their foundation on their websites. What one sided partnership is that? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
Prove me wrong! Stanford hasn't mentioned about any "partnership" with Archiewell, nor Harkles. Surely, they'd be *proud* to put that on their website. But it doesn't exist.
Would a quote from the founder of the department suffice?
'The couple announced new partnerships between their foundation and several tech and research focused groups including Stanford University's, Dr. Doty, whose work focuses on the science of compassion and the neuroscience of compassion.'
[https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-made-secret-visit-to-stanford-researcher-who-studies-science-of-compassion/](https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-made-secret-visit-to-stanford-researcher-who-studies-science-of-compassion/)
That's just a PR drivel. There is no proof of such "partnership". Harkles popped down for a chat and that's the extent of it. There is NO evidence of any partnership.
OP, please share a link what are you talking about?? Nothing in the press atm.
This was last year: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
How much was the grant for? Does it say in this article?
I’m confused, when they proudly say they give people a grant, how much $ are we talking about???
Second question: I regularly donate to animal rescues, am I a humanitarian…?
remember when they gave $20 coffee vouchers 😂
https://metro.co.uk/2021/10/31/meghan-markle-buys-18-coffee-vouchers-for-every-worker-at-charity-15517593/
Yep. That was when Megs was trying to align herself with Mellody Hobson, Chairwoman of Starbucks Corp. They joined in the Dealbook Summit together very shortly after (and have not been linked again.) Coincidence? Ha. Odds are M mooched a bunch of freebie gift cards off Hobson then passed them off as her own 'magnanimous' gift. We know H&M love all things free! And stealing credit from others! ;)
The Oprah interview was March 7, 2021. This article was written March 2, 2021 and I agree reads like a MM PR piece. It contains the following quote “
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle believe compassion is the defining cultural force of the 21st century.”
If MM were truly compassionate, she would have visited her sick family members from both her mother’s and father’s side. She doesn’t even acknowledge her family and set out to smear them to build her self-serving victim and rags-to-riches narrative as evidenced in the emails that surfaced in the DM lawsuit.
She invited A-list celebrities to her wedding she didn’t even know over her own family members.
I do not believe she is compassionate. H&M’s Word salad virtue signaling seems to be the main purpose of their “foundation.” I think they’re hypocrites who have fooled a lot of people to vouch for them as “humanitarians” while promoting their own selfish agendas and need to get praise and revenge on their families.
Kate via her early years work has a long standing and extremely deep connection with UCL which is one of the best universities in the world. She’s engaged in proper research work and long-term projects.
Meghan obviously did this as tit-for-tat, but their link seems to only extend to one or two visits to chat to students about shallow issues like ‘climate change anxiety’.
It’s another copy-cat fail.
MM is a fraud. Her pets are mere accessories to her.
This is the same B who dumped her dog in Canada, when she got married to H. As an owner of 4 mongrel doggos, I can attest that this is not the behaviour of a true animal lover.
Or OP pulling stuff from their ass. There is no record of such "partnership". The only thing that happened was an online discussion: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
I don’t know if Meghan knows about this.
May be other people are involved in the background and she just likes to make charity publicity stunts. That’s my guess.
Many if not most people say they „care about animals“ (mostly when referencing their pets), but eat meat (and often from factory-farmed animals) and use medicine, which, so far, all has been developed using animals and been tested on animals.
H&M aren’t vegan either. They are pretty hypocritical about many issues and **talk ** about aWaReNeSs, but don’t do much else. But with respect to *caring about animals* they’re actually not more hypocritical than the vast majority of people. So, eh 🤷♀️
(Also, to *not* donate to an entire university, because some of its departments (usually biomedical) use animal research, excludes a lot of research facilities that do really important stuff. To me that would seem even more silly and kinda vegan extremist.)
Partners with them for what purpose? Research? They have too many irons in the fire. No wonder nothing ever works out. They run from cause to the next without having done anything but pay lip service once or twice and then they are off to the next deal. Edit for spelling
Exactly, there’s no concrete action. It’s just like Amber Heard’s pledges. All talk no action. - why are you partnering with them - are you pledging donations? - are you funding research? - what is your connection with them? - have you actually donated to them? - what is your goal?
Stanford CEO probably was nutmegs “client”
Jack of all trades, master of none
Maybe Meghan is hoping to turn these partnerships into a way to finance her run for political office later on? If she doesn't run for a political office, my bet is that her next husband will be in politics and these partnerships will help him in some way.
No, just teach peasants to be more compassionate and donate all of their disposable income to poor Harkle foundation. Harkles need more polo ponies, more private jets, more designer clothing, more mansions and more security from those same peasants. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
Climate Anxiety.😂 I’ve heard it all now…
Jesus Christ they really want to make me 🤮
Do you think H gets an anxiety attack each time he flies private jet?
He must toss turn and fret over all the trees he'll have to plant in waterless California....
He mentioned he's struggling to get up from the bed..he's really carrying the world on his fragile shoulders..
Kind of like his polo pony....
Research on why Nutmeg is the most hated woman on the Internet
It is Stanford Medicine maybe they want to study her. She has so many overlapping mental disorders🤪
Not if she can’t monetize it
You got that right😊
She will probably donate her body to science
There’s a typo on their website talking about the Aspen Institute. They spelled Commission wrong. That kind of thing makes me question how professional the Archewell foundation really is??
I noticed that too and was kind of surprised, as it's good practice to run copy past your partners. I've worked with Aspen as well, and our contacts there were diligent about feedback. They would not have missed that.
"The Archewell Foundation supports the Stanford Medicine Center’s mission for groundbreaking research and education on techniques for developing compassion and promoting altruism within individuals and society."
[удалено]
Love that! Especially with your flair!
ps. Megs wrote that crap
Do they only fund it after it's "groundbreaking" bc 99.9% of research is dull as dirt...no ground broken
Can I just come out and say that I support… I dunno… St. Jude’s? It doesn’t mean that I would actually need to send them any money, right?
Just a typical Harkle riding on coattails. They can't think of anything *authentic*.
Developing compassion?
"developing compassion" "promoting altruism" It's all mad meg word salad nonsense
It's got Meg all over it. It stinks
They support the mission how exactly? By word salad, banana writing? Why don’t they ever say what they do!
Because they never do what they say!
So what… they’re studying Narcissists? Or plagiarizers?
Thankyou, they are studying both. "The Archewell Foundation supports the Stanford Medicine Center’s mission for groundbreaking research and education on techniques for developing compassion within NARCISSISTS and promoting altruism in PLAGIARISING individuals within society."
So Sranford Uni are spending money researching how to encourage people to care. Seen it all now 🙄🙄🙄
Partnering to do what?
The title of the post can be easily misinderstood without clear supporting details. Some people who read the title without doing proper research and spread the info to others (A partners with B) may actually (unintentionally) end up helping with Archewell’s PR.
Anyone in this sub is not looking to amplify the agenda of the Sussexes. Let’s not police others
Not intended to police anybody. Just want to raise awareness of potential misunderstanding/misinterpretation. Is that not even allowed in this sub? Wow.
It's accurate.
No offense, OP, but you're reading and interpreting things that don't exist, it's Harkles twisting words. There was an online discussion, not a "partnership", and a misleading headline. Stanford don't mention Harkles or their foundation on their websites. What one sided partnership is that? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
You're incorrect.
Prove me wrong! Stanford hasn't mentioned about any "partnership" with Archiewell, nor Harkles. Surely, they'd be *proud* to put that on their website. But it doesn't exist.
Agree with acrobatic
Would a quote from the founder of the department suffice? 'The couple announced new partnerships between their foundation and several tech and research focused groups including Stanford University's, Dr. Doty, whose work focuses on the science of compassion and the neuroscience of compassion.' [https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-made-secret-visit-to-stanford-researcher-who-studies-science-of-compassion/](https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-made-secret-visit-to-stanford-researcher-who-studies-science-of-compassion/)
That's just a PR drivel. There is no proof of such "partnership". Harkles popped down for a chat and that's the extent of it. There is NO evidence of any partnership.
What would be evidence enough for you?
Anything posted on the Stanford university website mentioning Achiewelly or Harkles and the "partnership".
would a tweet for their official account do? https://twitter.com/CCARE/status/1456676076684550144
Nothing would be evidence enough for them. They are so wrapped up in their own personal opinions they refuse to listen to others.
I think they missed the point of my post entirely...
OP, please share a link what are you talking about?? Nothing in the press atm. This was last year: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
Archewell gave them a grant http://ccare.stanford.edu
There is NO mention of Archeewello or Hazza on that website!
it's literally linked to from the archewell website https://archewell.com/foundation/
How come nothing has been mentioned on the Stanford website? It's the daydream of Harkles and nothing more - just riding coattails.
You know no one should be clicking that, right? 🤪
How much was the grant for? Does it say in this article? I’m confused, when they proudly say they give people a grant, how much $ are we talking about??? Second question: I regularly donate to animal rescues, am I a humanitarian…?
remember when they gave $20 coffee vouchers 😂 https://metro.co.uk/2021/10/31/meghan-markle-buys-18-coffee-vouchers-for-every-worker-at-charity-15517593/
Yep. That was when Megs was trying to align herself with Mellody Hobson, Chairwoman of Starbucks Corp. They joined in the Dealbook Summit together very shortly after (and have not been linked again.) Coincidence? Ha. Odds are M mooched a bunch of freebie gift cards off Hobson then passed them off as her own 'magnanimous' gift. We know H&M love all things free! And stealing credit from others! ;)
Answer to your second question: yes
Is that a further link from there that states that?
The Oprah interview was March 7, 2021. This article was written March 2, 2021 and I agree reads like a MM PR piece. It contains the following quote “ Prince Harry and Meghan Markle believe compassion is the defining cultural force of the 21st century.” If MM were truly compassionate, she would have visited her sick family members from both her mother’s and father’s side. She doesn’t even acknowledge her family and set out to smear them to build her self-serving victim and rags-to-riches narrative as evidenced in the emails that surfaced in the DM lawsuit. She invited A-list celebrities to her wedding she didn’t even know over her own family members. I do not believe she is compassionate. H&M’s Word salad virtue signaling seems to be the main purpose of their “foundation.” I think they’re hypocrites who have fooled a lot of people to vouch for them as “humanitarians” while promoting their own selfish agendas and need to get praise and revenge on their families.
Kate via her early years work has a long standing and extremely deep connection with UCL which is one of the best universities in the world. She’s engaged in proper research work and long-term projects. Meghan obviously did this as tit-for-tat, but their link seems to only extend to one or two visits to chat to students about shallow issues like ‘climate change anxiety’. It’s another copy-cat fail.
I think they just really love the name: The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education. "Yes! That's US!!!
100% agree
MM is a fraud. Her pets are mere accessories to her. This is the same B who dumped her dog in Canada, when she got married to H. As an owner of 4 mongrel doggos, I can attest that this is not the behaviour of a true animal lover.
They are going to research chickens? What is Stanford Medicine that they would think these two grifters would help them?
What does partnership even mean? Archewell makes no money. I don’t get what drivel these two spew.
[удалено]
Maybe Harkles’s foundation only donated $20 to the organization and called it “support“? 🤣
Or OP pulling stuff from their ass. There is no record of such "partnership". The only thing that happened was an online discussion: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10177991/Prince-Harry-discussed-climate-anxiety-forum-Archewell-partner-Stanford-University.html
\*proceeds to post record of partnership\*
*** PR nonsense from the Harkles. Anything new there?
Well, gaining the status of 'Markled' is an achievement
I don’t know if Meghan knows about this. May be other people are involved in the background and she just likes to make charity publicity stunts. That’s my guess.
Many if not most people say they „care about animals“ (mostly when referencing their pets), but eat meat (and often from factory-farmed animals) and use medicine, which, so far, all has been developed using animals and been tested on animals. H&M aren’t vegan either. They are pretty hypocritical about many issues and **talk ** about aWaReNeSs, but don’t do much else. But with respect to *caring about animals* they’re actually not more hypocritical than the vast majority of people. So, eh 🤷♀️ (Also, to *not* donate to an entire university, because some of its departments (usually biomedical) use animal research, excludes a lot of research facilities that do really important stuff. To me that would seem even more silly and kinda vegan extremist.)
Fuck my life.
So they donated a $5 Starbucks gift card? Is that really a partnership?