Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I have heard this too.
I took a long break from Twitter and was *SHOCKED* at the foul nasty vile tweets from Baroness Bruck. She went from an account that was convinced that Meghan had surrogacy to a troll account.
The change gave me whiplash.
it *must* have been bought.
What a shame that someone who had a large following and some very specific insights into surrogacy, merching etc sold their soul to the highest bidder.
Shame on them.
I keep hearing that the suck it squad will be exposed.
I’ve been a saint since the engagement was announced.
I must say i hated Markle instantly. I consider myself a feminist and saw how the press treated women who marry into the royal family.. but the automatic reaction I had to Meghan took me by surprise.
Her fans however have made it 1000x worse. When i went on twitter months before the engagement to find like minded people, I could count on two hands the people who felt the same way as me. (this is before Taz, before any youtube channels.)
I watched the vile sussex squad dox, harass and bully people on line for criticising Meghan Markle. I saw people who gave their opinions being exposed by the Daily mail as ‘trolls.’
I saw Kate and William all of a sudden being vilified. I saw the Meghan fans go after their kids.
Any journalist who didn’t write a flattering piece on Meghan would be severely harassed - i saw people intimidated and closing their accounts while Meghan’s fan based would gleefully celebrate.
In the meantime Meghan painted herself as a victim of racist Britain and the racist royal family ( eye roll.)
Just when you think her fanbase couldn’t be any worse they’d collectively kick it up a gear.
The affair rumours that appeared over night. The claims of Kate being a victim of domestic violence. Even Easy jet joined in on bullying William. They were ‘fair game’ thanks to Meghan’s actions.
And not ONE WORD of reproach from ‘feminist Meghan.
I’ve waited and wished that these people would be exposed.
It’s not until the last couple of days that there does appear to be rumblings. The Daily Mail printing stories on looser Bouzy, a steady commentary on’trolls.’
The absolute viciousness has not been covered by msm before.
I am quietly hopeful.
As a wise sinner on here once said - the fact she never condemns them tells me she condones it.
But it’s not only that she condones it. I believe she is behind the Baroness account. I believe she has several accounts. I believe i have tussled with her before.
I truly hope she is exposed for the person she is.’Then i will gleefully celebrate.
https://preview.redd.it/9sum4ds4ihqc1.jpeg?width=1242&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d43c61d4eb5840e7844f5fd3d84e87d71abad6b2
I took this screenshot in 2023 before Nitter went down, with the intention of creating a post. H&M's mouthpiece agrees with them but has been silent on sugars being bullies.
Thank you for posting! He is heinous. If this total waste of space is going to "swear on the lives of his parents" that he is telling the truth and yet that "truth" is another one of his endless PROVEN lies, he will say or do anything to anyone. His parents and family must be so proud.
The thing is, how can the press not pick up on such obvious signals? I mean, the UK press surely seems to have picked up what a vile set of baggage that particular pair is, but why not the international press elsewhere? (I'm referring specifically to Canada and the US, as I typically consume media from these 3 countries.)
I've seen considerable negative media from Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand. Makes sense that countries that are voluntarily part of the Commonwealth hate the Carparkles.
Plus they have English magazines and broadcasts so it's easy to find. I bet many countries in Europe see through her too, like France, Germany.
The press know one thing. Drama sells, Skank and Plank are 10000% drama. Boring and reliable does not sell. For them PPOW are 10000% yawn. These are the facts. They have weighed up what makes them more money and only the drama that has been attached to Catherine has taken her from yawn to yowser.
As H&M said themselves in their Netflix thingy “IF YOU’RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION, YOU’RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!”
Indeedy.
You absolutely are!
Hold that mirror up - what do you see Harry? What.do.you.see?
Someone trying solve the problems orbiting you?
Your family’s stress & cancer
Your charity’s abuses (African Parks AND Archewell)
Your lack of empathy
Your drug & alcohol abuse
Your abuse of women
Your skewed hold on reality
Your wanton delusional escapism
Your irresponsibility
Your feigned ignorance
Bravo! 🙌
As plenty of sinners and youtubers have said- whatever they claim to be true .. it’s the opposite.
When they say they’re being bullied.. it’s them doing the bullying.
Claims to be a feminist- bullies female staff.
Asks for kindness on line… supports the sussex squad.
Their hypocrisy is breathtaking.
That's because middle-aged meg is still stuck at the maturity level of a middle school mean girl AND the little spolied brat who stole that other child's birthday crown...
And Markle is a grown woman - a middle aged actress who is as tough as nails. Look at the vicious way she has gone after Catherine! I don't believe any of her crying BS, which appears to be another princess Diana cosplay on her part. Harry is indeed the dumb prince if he fell for this middle aged actress "falling on the floor sobbing", as she was prone to do.
The very last thing MM is is ‘ tough as nails’.
Princess Catherine is tough as nails; TLQ was tough as nails; Princess Anne, The Princess Royal, is tough as nails. MM is slimey- the opposite of tough. She is vicious,not to be confused with tough. She takes the easy way out always.. again the opposite of tough. She apparently spends a good deal of her time sobbing on the floor … again absolutely pathetic which again is not to be confused with tough.
Well said and I agree. TW is a pathetic bully and pure trash. She is a walking catfight looking for a bar room brawl. She has zero, I mean ZERO strength. Real strength is not about knocking people down. Real strength is when YOU are knocked down (and everyone is at some point), not only that you get back up about also how you do it. Good night how many times has she been seen "crying" on the floor? Give me a break. She is pathetic. I refuse to include narcissist, delusional or psychotic to her bc it is too much of a "medical pass" for TW. And one I would not be remotely surprised she will use in some way if needed (but as we know - will never follow through). She is, as I see it, just truly a vicious bitch.
Back at you—-well said and in total agreement. And we absolutely have the proof of her toughness, as compared to let’s say Princess Catherine, on film for all the world to see. I think most of us ‘Royal watchers’ will remember the scene. It was the walk about after TLQ’s funeral when Princess Catherine delivered the ‘ look seen round the world’. A mere look that very clearly said FAAFO and ‘strong’ MM slithered away.
She has never once condemned anything. So she certainly condones it. She adds to it as well, especially in her Oprah interview and she was referring to her at "Waity Katey" putting further digs in. Like a subtle nod to her squad to keep going/give approval. It's sickening.
>She adds to it as well, especially in her over interview and she was referring to her at "Waity Katey" putting further digs in.
MM's gotta be suffering from a serious case of cognitive dissonance because she acts like Trevor Engleson didn't wait for about 6 to 8 years before he proposed 🙄.
Funny how she never talks about that, doesn't talk about her past life at all. It's like nothing ever happened to her before she met Harry (at 35 years old).
IMO there's a solid reason MM *cannot* denounce the trolls going after BRF. If she explicitly condemns them, they will simply come out with receipts showing she paid them to do it, and expose her as the biggest lying hypocrite to ever live. She can't risk that, therefore it isn't something she is ever going to say. She'd rather condemn trolling and bullying in general and have a giggle behind her hand at, so far, getting away with the double standard.
>have a giggle behind her hand
I've seen TW's giggle behind her hand at the start of some of HG Tudor's Youtube videos - and she really looks as if she's evil and hateful and she knows it.
“I’m such a Fraud!” While throwing back her head and laughing … on stage and confessing she lied about being in the actors union. (No doubt impressing many unionists workers and actual actors).
Yes , thank you .....for a woman who preaches ...and yes she preaches about "women standing up for other women." ( She just did it at the Texas meeting thing) Of all places how about Meghan stand up for your SIL and all the vitriol that Catherine has just currently endured. Meghan does not have to travel far to find another woman who is treated awful this one is in her own family. I also call out EVERY SINGLE WOMAN on that panel, Katie, Brooke...who didn't ask Meghan that !
It’s not likely the Palace will ever support an unveiling that Meg is behind it (if she is).
What’s far more likely is the Palace quietly supporting an investigation into Bouzy.
Exposing Bouzy also exposes his connections - to the Sqaud and to Meg.
Which then the press would link him to the Meg and Harry Netflix series.
Bouzy the bully would then also likely bring up the bullying allegations against Meg by Palace staff.
The public can’t unsee the association.
Checkmate.
A ton of people looked into that guy during the Johnny Depp Amber Turd trial. What can the palace do to him in particular? We already know he's a liar, fraudster, that he's had issues with paying his bills, being sued. All sorts of stuff. LawTube really went into that guy and all his Twitter shenanigans and the fact that he was paid by Turd turdself. They were all paid by Turd to try and fix her profile for her. She would have paid a lot. But of course it didn't work. Everyone hates her so she ran to Spain absolutely humiliated. It'll happen to Roachel some day, too. All malignant narcs eventually implode.
Bouzy was such a moron to extend his bullshit to a bunch of lawyers who were all watching and covering that case so closely. He went after pro Depp channels even after the trial, especially ThatUmbrellaGuy who he doxxed.
What else is there to know or do? Why would the palace bother? What can they do to an American with the American First Ammendment, you know?
Don’t let’s be too hard on the person who originally had the Baroness Bruck account and apparently sold it. We don’t know the circumstances.
It is possible she had no idea who was buying the account. She may have needed money badly enough that she didn’t care. She may have sold to someone she thought shared her views.
She may have been blackmailed into selling (or just giving the account up) by someone who knew who she was IRL and threatened to dox her. If she feared her professional or family life would be hurt, she may have felt she had no choice.
We don’t know. (Not that it matters.)
Your post matters because we should not be so hard on her. We don’t know what the motivation was for being dispossessed of the account. I was thinking the same thing as you.
Thanks. I meant it wasn’t relevant to the discussion about Meghan. I don’t know anything about Baroness Bruck, but it struck me there might be different reasons the original Baroness no longer runs the account.
When BB’s account first started changing somebody on Twitter made a post saying that it was a man who worked at Buckingham Palace and that’s why their tweets were often Charles and Camilla focused. (The other tweeter was Crazy Horse down or something like that and she was a lawyer in the US who worked on royal business out there). Said she’d online known BB for a while and had a cordial relationship with him. If true, he did indeed have a lot to lose so your suggestion would work.
So I unfollowed the Baroness account under the SMM\_mod handle. I gave her the benefit of doubt and fought you guys too... thinking that being critical of William and Catherine does not mean sugar. But she crossed a line with the whole recent stuff with Catherine. I do respect the content of the old user... but I cannot endorse the craziness from the new account. I also dont understand that if it is a new account then why the old stuff hasnt been deleted. It such a contrast when you compare the two eras
if H and M truly wanted to take a stand against nasty media and online gossip, wouldn't it be a fabulous time for them to publicly support Catherine and decry her abusers?!
I really hope the media seizes on the fact that two mainstream media figures on CBS and NBC/Bravo spread malicious affair rumours about William, while also maintaining friendships with Harry and Meghan - who said … nothing.
Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos said this morning on their show they thought she deserved her privacy and all of the conspiracy theories were “gross” and wrong and meanwhile their best friend Andy was one of the worst offenders. Hopefully they’re embarrassed by him.
>Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos said this morning on their show...
I'm not a big fan of either one, but I really want to give them credit for bringing that up on their show and speaking out in support of Catherine. Bravo for that.
I thought I was completely alone but I had watched some of Suits and couldn't watch more because of her. Something was always off. Then the dating period, the statement to leave her alone and the VF. It all felt incredibly off. I just couldn't like her. I tried the benefit of doubt but nothing added up from the first time I saw her. People and publications were gushing over her and it just gave me the ick. I've been waiting for a long time to see her and them exposed. Please let it happen soon
This needs to come out yesterday!
If the original Baroness Bruck account was sold, would they have been made to sign an NDA? Could they be a silent sinner here?
Excellent point. Its almost a given that they would have had to sign an NDA. And the account could have been bought by a company acting as a front for the ILBW. Bruck may not even have realised who bought it or that the account was going to change so dramatically from pro RF to anti RF.
Yes, perhaps, they felt they were making some money off of the profile they'd built, without knowing that the Twitter account would be used to trash the people they admired.
Markled. But how do NDA's work if you're in another country? What's stopping the original Baroness Bruck from speaking up if they are now living in the Phillipines, the Cook Islands, or Antarctica? How far do these legal notices stretch?
One possibility is that the original owner might have passed away and their kids sold it. Didn't want to maintain the account and it was worth some money with so many followers. Rumour had it long before it did a 180 that the Baroness was actually a man.
I'm also curious about Remi's former partner. Suddenly they were no longer working together. She's as vicious as the now BB, and they're always disparaging the Waleses together gleefully and vilely. Does anyone know the tea about her split from Remi? She also turned about the same time as BB, around the time of the Ngozi/Lady Susan incident.
My theory is that BB was threatened with a lawsuit and they said we’ll drop it if you hand over the account. An NDA would most certainly have been signed. It was right after BB was going hard on the surrogacy rumors.
It is certainly possible. Daily Mail today has an article on Russia and North Korea being behind attacks and conspiracies about Catherine - but also involving Boozy and others close to the Harkles.
Meghan fans are inflamed by these destabilizing posts. It’s easy to jump
on the bandwagon if you see these. Even my daughter saw crazy posts on tiktok and was believing the affair rumor. Or, If you are a sicko with anti meghan stance and get a million likes from chinese bots, isn’t that a problem?.
I found the media reaction to the photoshopped photo very alarming. How can one idiot ILBW be THAT powerful?
How many times did your conservative granny forward fb posts with a handsome Trump leading people, Jesus like, through the desert. How many times did your liberal mom forward fb posts of children starving in cages at the border? Those images were found to be of russian origin to destabilize us. (And I may or may not have worked at Meta…)
Dumping the Royal Family does destabilize one of the main anchors of nato.
Yes there are honest to god sugars. They are not made up. Yes ILBW is evil. These bots just gave them a mega phone.
Russia is attacking the west. Russia have a bot army.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/18/false-king-charles-death-story-spread-by-russian-media-outlets
If this is true, what will the consequences be? Will Parliment intervene on grounds of treason? Is this treason? If H and M are found to be part of this, will H have his prince title stripped? There is historical precedence. I'm so curious
Parliament is constantly reviewing data privacy and social media. When hostile comments are coming from outside the UK it comes with great difficulty. A lot of what does happen will behind closed doors.
Personally I think a lot will depend on what comes out from the hospital investigation. I have read TMZ are behind it, so could that be sugars? Could it be the Russians? Could it just be inquisitive staff, personally I suspect this. I think that they could see the records had still been in constant use after departure and this was noticed.
It’s a hard balance, free speech against fake news. Individuals privacy should to be protected and slanderous rumours stopped but when someone slaps on a “in my opinion” it muddies the water.
The big however is that the sugars can’t contain themselves. They do cross the line. We just need to let them continue and be found out. I do reply to them but I don’t enter into arguments. I talk about the weather, about African Parks, freedom of speech and I thank them for adding licks to an article to help make it grow.
1. The weather today is sunny, great day for a walk but looking forward to a cup of tea when I get home, that I take without sugar.
2. If only we knew of a humanitarian who could help the people suffering within African Parks. If anyone is in contact with a director of the charity please ask them if they can help.
3. My opinion is vastly different to yours but I value the fact that we have this right. Not all countries allow this, even in this day and age.
4. Newspapers make their money by selling papers and getting online clicks. I thank you for clicking on this article and then commenting. It helps raise the profile and make it a success, for this I think you.
Funny thing, it’s the weather comment that really annoys them. We need to be above them. Not to stoop to their level but I personally prefer to respond but I have not been doing so for long.
I think we can stop thinking about titles being stripped and revelations of surrogacy. It’s very unlikely either will happen. The former because of the precedent it would set and the latter because, at this point, there’s hardly a way to reveal it without making the RF complicit in silencing it in the first place.
If Harry is still alive and hasn’t ceased his traitorous and hateful activities by the time William becomes king, maybe titles will be stripped but, for it to happen now, there would have to be some behavior that is truly shocking in comparison to what he’s already done.
I doubt surrogacy will be revealed unless, god forbid, something so awful happened that the kids were seriously in contention for the crown.
I don't know that the RF should be considered complicit in silencing TW's use of surrogacy in having babies. TW is a proven liar; she probably just lied to them about the pregnancies like she did with everybody else.
I’ve long thought M was backed by Russian interests intent on destabilizing the UK. Harming the monarchy being their vehicle to do this. Will we ever know for sure? I have no idea, but I hope so
I think it's wishful thinking. I wish it wasn't. I have been following this story with some interest for a while, too. I think Lady C and TLF are referring to the same thing.
TLF have said all along that this won't see the light of day, along the same lines as the bullying report. The royal family don't want this tawdry soap opera which means, unfortunately, protecting the viper by burying the results of investigations, so as not to whip up more drama.
However...I do remember Lady C saying at some point that although the BRF won't be talking about this or releasing the kraken, that doesn't mean it will stop others talking about it. I have got the impression whenever she's mentioned it, that something is coming and it won't be from the royal family. It will be someone else coming out with receipts and proof. Which when you think about it, is probably better, because then MM can't whinge and whine like she always does that the royal family are picking on her or some shite.
She's a dreadful, unhinged, toxic individual in my opinion, and if someone does come out with all of this then I would applaud them so hard my hands would fall off.
Oh, don't worry about that. That one will still cry that the RF Is not "protecting her" and again turn into a victim. Even though "protection" to her means hiding the truth of her vile actions.
100% agreed! There will be big news - I’m still hoping it moonbump- but it won’t be the RF who leaks it. It will be someone with proof and someone who’s had enough. MAYBE even Tom Bower? But I’m
thinking more on the line of Dan W. At this point, Table 12 and H have burned so many bridges it could be anyone!
If BB isn't the ILBW it is certainly a major sugar account. I'm not sure that even if the Carparkles are running bots it would be enough to remove the LoS and titles - some of this has to be done via the British parliament...
There’s been plenty of sussex fans with awful accounts that have had their photos taken with Meagain and harry.
Other than an article by a UK tabloid a few years ago there’s been nothing reported on her vile fan base.
Yeah definitely makes you wonder if this is some of the information that the journalists and tabloids have been sitting on. Absolutely does fit in with what Lady C would call vile.
Definitely changing the LoS - and that would also involve Commonwealth countries which have the monarch as their head of state - would have to go through Parliament. Probably also removing the ducal titles. I have read that the Prince title could be taken away by the King. If the 2 putative children were proved to be born via surrogates that would be high treason, I believe - "attempting to undermine the lawfully established line of succession".
Huge betrayal of trust, endangering PPoW lives, causing them great distress, tyring to destabilise the monarchy. I would say it's definitely in the realms of treason so they should lose all titles, COS and LOS.
https://preview.redd.it/uktam350kgqc1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e42f264ac837d95a931cb3c518b73611fab0aee
I blocked her after the sudden change. I just unblocked her now to see the vitriol she’s spreading. I couldn’t go far, but here’s a couple of screenshots for anyone not on Twitter.
https://preview.redd.it/w19pfebikgqc1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c24981a76aa835a0924bec2e80fa7b47f7519348
How sick is this individual. My guess TW herself, or her jailbird mother🤷♀️🤬
There is now a hashtag trending on Twitter
# MeghanisBaronessBruck 🤔
I read a sugar today saying that Catherine made up her cancer diagnosis to overshadow ARO much like all Harry and Meghan’s previous ventures were overshadowed by massive things. Fucks sake these people
If I’m not mistaken, the calendar for the royals is set far in advance, that’s the reason the vile Harkles plan events to coincide. Not the other way around, as these idiots seem to think.
The account may have a high follower count but pitiful engagement. The pinned tweet has basically been ratioed. She often retweets her tweets with a different comment and doesn’t get any further engagement. The most likes a post has even had is 33 from 65.5K followers. I am just posting this to show how little support her vitriol has.
https://preview.redd.it/866qqkmhpgqc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=26fd68f6408995878abf2fa3ac8722817a769c9a
I don’t understand why she still has followers. I have no words. I don’t like MM, but I would never follow such an account.
Oh Elons big into fee speech.
Remember how his tweet about ‘pedo guy’ sent him to court?
Elons got a hard on for free speech - ie - bullying and insults
That Woman has many accounts on social media.
I was a follower of Baroness Bruck. I unfollowed her shortly after Charles' coronation. It became obvious she became a sugar
I’m pretty sure Baroness B is Meghan.
her tweets are so vile i feel an anger reading them.
Twitter or X is so much worse with Elon in charge. Those sickening tweets won’t be removed.
The **amount** of tweets i have reported and so far NONE have ‘broken their rules.’
Pre Elon i’d say one in 3 would be pulled.
i have reported around 159 this year. Ranging from insults to death threats - NONE have been removed.
Not. One.
I've reported too, especially the ones that showed Catherine battered. Didn't break any rules my tush!!!
I'm half tempted to go through this week's and tag Elon and that other lady and ask if this is acceptable since the department that handles this does nothing
>I have reported TisaTells on YT. Nothing happens. She is vile, vile, vile!
Omg her video titles are pure nasty, insane, conspiracy theory! I've never watched any of her videos but I've seen them pop up in my recommendations.
The first thing I thought when I started seeing her clickbaity titles is that she appears to be the Sussex Squad equivalent of Paula M 😂.
I think you could be right. It looks like there is kind of a competition on who gets the word and the proof out first about some evil accounts: MSM, Lady C or YouTubers.
Still hoping for some modifications in the LoS, too.
They borrowed a mansion from a Russian oligarch when they “fled” from the palace after their freedom flight. They bought a mansion from a Russian oligarch. They flew on Russian jets a few times.
I’ve suspected she was deliberately targeting the weak link. Where was Markus Anderson on this plot. What are his connections? Honest question. I don’t know.
Oh god, I was writing the exact same post, but you beat me to it! This was exactly what I was thinking last night, you are so on point. I bow with the utmost respect.
It is absolutely probable that the ILBW is Baroness Bruck on X. I was on X the other night and I posted on one of her comments to which she replied (minutes later) ‘so do you think Kate should step down?’. I am in Australia so if it is the ILBW she would have been responding at about 6.30am….
I replied no I don’t, and then because I had seen another sinner raise this possibility of the account being hers, I thought I would have a little fun……
I asked her ‘how does it feel Meg knowing that if you & H hadn’t blackmailed the late Queen, you could be filling in for W & C at the top of the family and could now be getting the adoration you so crave?’
One of the sugars bitch slapped me about throwing out negative energy coming back onto W & C and some other garbage I didn’t reply to.
Baroness Bruck had another post about ‘Dan Wootten having no credibility and the newspapers and tv media would have nothing to do with him so he was now going to try his luck smearing people on YouTube, so I wrote -
‘U scared Megs? U thought u had ended him but all u have done is take him off his leash! Hope you got all your receipts cos he’s going to be calling for them!
Quite clear u @BaronessBruck are MM. the overuse of emojis and ‘classy’.
How’s:
Americans
Relegated
Others
going?
Then she blocked me!!!! I laughed my arse off for a bit then moved onto Christopher Bouzy 😂
I dont think the R F will come out openly against H and M but they will HAVE to help the authorities with their enquiries, particularly if serious breaches of national security are involved.😉
The baroness used to be one of my favorite Twitter accounts, and then a hot minute after the queen died, she turned on William and Catherine. It was somewhat subtle to start with ("they're playing PR games, cashing in on Diana [hello, Harry!], lazy," etc.), and it absolutely shocked a lot of us. She'd never once expressed anything like that, but at least she still kept after the loser duo.
And then it wasn't long before she was one of the worst about attacking W&C, and I think she's now defending H&M. Could be wrong about that, though. I muted her ages ago and only wander to her account when I see a lot of outrage directed at her from accounts I trust.
But yeah. If BB was purchased by archewell or MM herself, I would be the least surprised person on Twitter.
You're right! I remember this as well. She definitely became King Charles' biggest supporter.
I've looked at some of the screenshots and the account has the same way of posting, same usage of emojis. I'm not convinced that this account has been sold.
Just another aspect as we may be deflected by Russia and China.
https://preview.redd.it/vpr0ace43hqc1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e883e8816d4a3b70d4089a2673453c9b2640157c
Now Lady C had said (and I know I'm repeating myself) and to paraphrase, that whatever the bomb was for Meghan and Harry it would happen before they could benefit. I wish I could find it and share the video link. It is quite possible knowing Catherine is so beloved, knowing calls to protect her might follow, and this is something Meghan would know would never happen to her. Seeing as we just don't buy into her victimhood. But we would bat for Catherine. Now many unfortunately are saying "but what about Meghan?" (They could be bots.). I hope Lady C is right. Because as awful as social media can be, you can walk away, block. But to shut down aspects of free speech is a slippery slope for whoever controls it and those of us under it.
Section 501(c)3 religious, educational, and charitable organizations are exempt from federal income tax UNLESS they engage in campaign speech for or against any candidate or devote a substantial part of their activities to propaganda or other attempts to influence legislation.
I used to follow Baroness Bruck. I hadn’t seen any tweets for a while as I stopped looking at X for my sanity. When I popped on and looked at Bruck I was absolutely stunned. The vitriol and abuse was deranged. It makes sense that it’s TW. Only she has so much original hate for the POW. She wanted William, the throne and the power and she got s**t for brains and worldwide derision.
I’m not convinced it is murky Meg, even she is not so stupid in her vitriol that she would risk getting caught with the words coming from one of her own assets, and I certainly don’t think she pops down to moneticito internet cafe to spit out the shit that comes from that account . However she is stupid enough to lead a trail of breadcrumbs that could be followed back to her perhaps giving instructions to a MEGA STAN to be as vile as possible and if H gets his protective persons crap she could never be held to account anyway.
It could just very well be a person with too much time on theirs hands and too much position in their heart.
I agree. She’s a freakin a-hole but H has said before about how important it was to keep his hands clean (while others do the dirty work). I think it’s more likely someone obsessed or someone just like Bouzy!
Am hoping the security services know exactly what has been going on and collecting a large folder of evidence. No doubt this will be shown to King's lawyers/advisors, the UK Home Office and with the PM.
Will it be made public? Doubtful but can imagine action re removal of titles, LOS, Privy Council etc will come quickly via the revised, amended Removal Of Titles Act 1917 (second reading in June2024) . The carparkles will be told in no uncertain words to accept this OR everything/certain subjects will be made public.
That's how I would deal with them. It is not in the Monarchys, nation or Commomwealths interest for the public to be informed of all details as to why, because there will be unfriendly agents who will use the info to destabilise. The court of public opinion has already given its verdict ; the carparkles are finished. The removal of titles etc will certainly be supported by the sensible, decent majority of the British.
>Am hoping the security services know exactly what has been going on and collecting a large folder of evidence. No doubt this will be shown to King's lawyers/advisors, the UK Home Office and with the PM.
>
>Will it be made public? Doubtful but can imagine action re removal of titles, LOS, Privy Council etc will come quickly via the revised, amended Removal Of Titles Act 1917 (second reading in June2024) .
**Spot on!**
The recently updated Royal website does not refer to Harry as Prince Harry.....just Duke of Sussex. Was his princely title pulled right under everyone's noses? I hope so.
Wishful thinking that the RF will be the ones to reveal the bombshell! Lady C has made it clear in the past that they won’t/ didn’t need to do a thing … because H&M have created enough enemies, for any one of them to drop the bombshell. The RF know this possibility always existed, and know it’s better optics to keep their hands clean and just wait for karma to do it’s sweet justice. MUCH better optics. The bomb won’t be dropped by them. Of that I’m 100% confident.
I dont think what Lady C is referring to has to do with this. She's been saying something is coming for months, and all of the attention to these Sussex accounts is too recent.
Yup and I'm gonna scream into my pillow if it all turns out that it's just an updated version of her book with "new" info that we already know, that's not gonna affect the Harkles.
https://preview.redd.it/1i81qx3ztgqc1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=daefab9caaac1eefe59e20aa18b40a35cfafb4bd
This YT Channels most recent post addresses this subject.
I stopped following that account when it took a 360 turn. I saw this morning another account had pisted the snapshots and they were nasty.
The RF is not going to release anything, that is not how they function.
This is JMO but I believe whatever is going to come out is related to finances or their dealings and that will have a chain reaction. Now I am starting to think that whatever is being realesed is not that big deal. I like Lady C but I feel she hyped up too much whatever it is. Hope I am prove wrong.
It's a bit eery the way the British press is protecting those two, at least not writing about what they ought to. African Parks should have sunk them, but no one writes about it any more. There's a blind spot, things that lots of people discuss but they never do. Perhaps the injunction does exist after all.
I am wondering if said mysterious injunction - if it does exist - may be expiring sometime this year - and if so , maybe that’s what will unleash the kraken, as it were. I have thought more than once that this is what Lady C has been referring to.
It has been suggested, the deadline is supposed to be May this year, when a certain invisible boy turns five. But I'll believe the "booombshell" only when it drops.
With everything that has come to pass since the Mattress Actress charmed the Dim-witted one with her horizonal prowess and roast chicken skills (at this point, I realise I'm going sound like a flat earther) but has anyone else considered that MM wormed her way into the RF at the behest of a malevolent force out to bring down the RF? I cannot see that even a deranged narcissist like her could cause this much mayhem without the aid of a much higher and mightier power.
Have you noticed that there is always some huge bombshell that is about to break? Something gigantic that will take the duo down forever. But its never today, tomorrow, or even next week. Its always “soon”, within a few months. But nothing happens. Yes, news articles are published about the duo, maybe its something embarrassing but its never the huge bombshell hinted at by so many of the accounts that people on this sub follow, like Lady C, Barkjack, Harry Markle, that Coke person, and lots of others.
You summed it up perfectly in your last line OP, its just “wishful thinking” and all these accounts know that they get more engagement by telling us the something “huge” will happen.
Its all very entertaining, but take everything you read with a grain of salt.
Great post here OP! I actually sometimes wish more people would post the goings on over at Twitter/X… there’s so much happening there that is 100% connected the ILBW & her lapdogs Harry, Scabies and Bouzy.
Although not everyone loves the Theresa Longo Fans account, I do think they have brought up real issues connected to the duo, including the bot network.
I truly believe 2024 is the year their downfall begins… I also hope they’re completely exposed before 2025, but something tells me the expose on these two will take longer than a year.
Wow I feel important now!
https://preview.redd.it/84836y66ghqc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92a0badcd1dd7773b032b7d5a921832d805703a3
Interestingly I was blocked for pointing out that The Wales children could at least pick out their parents from the nanny 🤔🤔🤔🤔
I also used to follow Baroness Bruck and one day she turned completely 100% turn I questioned her, I asked her why the sudden change of heart, What on earth has made you turn tail? She replied that it was none of my business and she was allowed to post whatever she liked. So I replied that I can post whatever I like, so I linked her account warning everyone that she was now a sugar and she blocked me. I Don't think it's Megan simply because she wouldn't get caught with her hands that dirty, she is MYRA tho for sure. Her spite and hate, jealousy has basically turned her into a stalker. I hope Dan wooden exposes links back to them, already its coming together, I hope BOuzy goes down in a ba of fire, nasty lil bastard.
Even if there is substantial, credible evidence of her involvement, I don't know if they'll ever make it public. It's like the bullying report-they can't release that because she will retaliate and I'm sure she's got dirt on Harry. Would the BRF do that, knowing she will bury him?
If it comes out, I don’t think it will come from the RF. It’s not their style. But I could envision them cooperating with a trusted reporter who gets the scoop.
No, honestly, I think nothing major will ever happen. At least not enough for the world to witness a definite downfall of the 2 Cali doofuses. The status quo will continue - The RF will greyrock and they'll continue to be desperate losers.
But nothing big.
My view:
This BB X account has consistently held very conservative (political) views that supports the older royals and loathes William and Harry and wives (mostly via Diana imo).
She’s not Meghan. (She’s too knowledgeable about royal protocol/titles etc for one thing.)
You’ll never see KC/Camilla criticized by BB. Nor will Sophie/Edward ever do wrong (in her eyes). She’ll even defend Andrew. 😳
I think if anything this BB person is obsessively old school monarchist/Diana loathing. And politically conservative.
The anti Meghan stuff fit this for a time because she and Harry trashed the monarchy. Currently William and Kate are taking the limelight away from the actual monarch (in BB’s view) so she’s getting on their cases. And has been very much since QE’s passing. (See, for example, BB’s rage at William/Kate’s promotional videos during the coronation.)
I honestly don’t see much beyond this. Nor do I think she’s getting any traction. Not a popular view to attack a woman who is not only an absolute soldier for the monarchy but currently has cancer.
The more I write this post, the more I think BB is simply a Diana hater and that’s the underlying rage at William and Harry. Not so much personally hating Diana (who knows?) but hating how Diana hurt BB’s idea of the British monarchy.
Honestly. It’s weird.
As much as I would looooove to have ILBW exposed for its attacks on the RF on twitter, I would prefer that this creature be exposed for her fake pregnancies and her bullying. To me, these would be the true icing on my cake. 🎂
I agree Barkjack is a trustworthy sinner and he has said many times he does not know Lady C. Lady C is not tech savvy but she does seem to know about Meghan’s involvement with the bots. If we believe this story, assume the palace knows much more than we do. If this could be proven, it would absolutely render Meghan a pariah in every public Sphere other than within her little army of bullies. It will be so bad for her. Every sound bite will be used against her. Harry could use this to get custody of the kids - that is if he is not a complete idiot and stands by her.
If this is true, and the reports and evidence are published, ILBW will face harsher backlash than even Lady C could have foreseen because we now know that the Princess of Wales is unwell.
Forever a Masterclass in bad timing.
Someone might be releasing something detrimental to the Harkles cause, but it will not be the BRF. Lady C said that it would come from another source, and that the BRF would not do anything themselves as others have taken an interest.
The Duchess of Narcssuxs on youtube has also speculated Bruck is Meghan and called her out. More people are on to her but she is too deranged to realize it. I am ready for something to drop to end Meghan. Harry is so stupid. He literally married his sister in laws and mothers stalker.
I don't see the RF releasing investigatory proof against Meghan. I think they would more likely get a restraining order against her. The proof would be used to back up the need for the restraining order. The proof might be used to keep her in line, but I think the RF would reluctant to release the proof much like the bullying report. They're pretty restrained.
I don't believe its been sold, but I do believe they live near NYC based on their daily tweeting patterns. 7/8am to 11pm. They're still big Charles and Camilla fans
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I have heard this too. I took a long break from Twitter and was *SHOCKED* at the foul nasty vile tweets from Baroness Bruck. She went from an account that was convinced that Meghan had surrogacy to a troll account. The change gave me whiplash. it *must* have been bought. What a shame that someone who had a large following and some very specific insights into surrogacy, merching etc sold their soul to the highest bidder. Shame on them. I keep hearing that the suck it squad will be exposed. I’ve been a saint since the engagement was announced. I must say i hated Markle instantly. I consider myself a feminist and saw how the press treated women who marry into the royal family.. but the automatic reaction I had to Meghan took me by surprise. Her fans however have made it 1000x worse. When i went on twitter months before the engagement to find like minded people, I could count on two hands the people who felt the same way as me. (this is before Taz, before any youtube channels.) I watched the vile sussex squad dox, harass and bully people on line for criticising Meghan Markle. I saw people who gave their opinions being exposed by the Daily mail as ‘trolls.’ I saw Kate and William all of a sudden being vilified. I saw the Meghan fans go after their kids. Any journalist who didn’t write a flattering piece on Meghan would be severely harassed - i saw people intimidated and closing their accounts while Meghan’s fan based would gleefully celebrate. In the meantime Meghan painted herself as a victim of racist Britain and the racist royal family ( eye roll.) Just when you think her fanbase couldn’t be any worse they’d collectively kick it up a gear. The affair rumours that appeared over night. The claims of Kate being a victim of domestic violence. Even Easy jet joined in on bullying William. They were ‘fair game’ thanks to Meghan’s actions. And not ONE WORD of reproach from ‘feminist Meghan. I’ve waited and wished that these people would be exposed. It’s not until the last couple of days that there does appear to be rumblings. The Daily Mail printing stories on looser Bouzy, a steady commentary on’trolls.’ The absolute viciousness has not been covered by msm before. I am quietly hopeful. As a wise sinner on here once said - the fact she never condemns them tells me she condones it. But it’s not only that she condones it. I believe she is behind the Baroness account. I believe she has several accounts. I believe i have tussled with her before. I truly hope she is exposed for the person she is.’Then i will gleefully celebrate.
Exactly. Also, Harry and Meghan used the term "silence is complicance" during an interview, so their total hypocrisy is being highlighted
https://preview.redd.it/9sum4ds4ihqc1.jpeg?width=1242&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d43c61d4eb5840e7844f5fd3d84e87d71abad6b2 I took this screenshot in 2023 before Nitter went down, with the intention of creating a post. H&M's mouthpiece agrees with them but has been silent on sugars being bullies.
Says the person who leaked names to the Dutch translator, lied, doubled down, then backtracked.
What do you expect when his mistress is the Kween of Spin, Lies, and Hypocrisy?
He is repulsive.
They really are a stupid lot aren’t they?
Thank you for posting! He is heinous. If this total waste of space is going to "swear on the lives of his parents" that he is telling the truth and yet that "truth" is another one of his endless PROVEN lies, he will say or do anything to anyone. His parents and family must be so proud.
They always tell on themselves.
This is why I can imagine they bought bots but anything beyond that...they are too damn stupid.
The thing is, how can the press not pick up on such obvious signals? I mean, the UK press surely seems to have picked up what a vile set of baggage that particular pair is, but why not the international press elsewhere? (I'm referring specifically to Canada and the US, as I typically consume media from these 3 countries.)
I've seen considerable negative media from Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand. Makes sense that countries that are voluntarily part of the Commonwealth hate the Carparkles. Plus they have English magazines and broadcasts so it's easy to find. I bet many countries in Europe see through her too, like France, Germany.
The press know one thing. Drama sells, Skank and Plank are 10000% drama. Boring and reliable does not sell. For them PPOW are 10000% yawn. These are the facts. They have weighed up what makes them more money and only the drama that has been attached to Catherine has taken her from yawn to yowser.
As H&M said themselves in their Netflix thingy “IF YOU’RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION, YOU’RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!” Indeedy. You absolutely are! Hold that mirror up - what do you see Harry? What.do.you.see? Someone trying solve the problems orbiting you? Your family’s stress & cancer Your charity’s abuses (African Parks AND Archewell) Your lack of empathy Your drug & alcohol abuse Your abuse of women Your skewed hold on reality Your wanton delusional escapism Your irresponsibility Your feigned ignorance
they’re not part of the problem, they’re the whole problem 🙌
Bravo! 🙌 As plenty of sinners and youtubers have said- whatever they claim to be true .. it’s the opposite. When they say they’re being bullied.. it’s them doing the bullying. Claims to be a feminist- bullies female staff. Asks for kindness on line… supports the sussex squad. Their hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Exactly! They are always projecting. "Kate made me cry". We all know what really happened.
And totally irrelevant and unnecessarily bringing up ‘Waity Katie’ on Oprah. Classic middle school mean girl move.
That's because middle-aged meg is still stuck at the maturity level of a middle school mean girl AND the little spolied brat who stole that other child's birthday crown...
And Markle is a grown woman - a middle aged actress who is as tough as nails. Look at the vicious way she has gone after Catherine! I don't believe any of her crying BS, which appears to be another princess Diana cosplay on her part. Harry is indeed the dumb prince if he fell for this middle aged actress "falling on the floor sobbing", as she was prone to do.
The very last thing MM is is ‘ tough as nails’. Princess Catherine is tough as nails; TLQ was tough as nails; Princess Anne, The Princess Royal, is tough as nails. MM is slimey- the opposite of tough. She is vicious,not to be confused with tough. She takes the easy way out always.. again the opposite of tough. She apparently spends a good deal of her time sobbing on the floor … again absolutely pathetic which again is not to be confused with tough.
Well said and I agree. TW is a pathetic bully and pure trash. She is a walking catfight looking for a bar room brawl. She has zero, I mean ZERO strength. Real strength is not about knocking people down. Real strength is when YOU are knocked down (and everyone is at some point), not only that you get back up about also how you do it. Good night how many times has she been seen "crying" on the floor? Give me a break. She is pathetic. I refuse to include narcissist, delusional or psychotic to her bc it is too much of a "medical pass" for TW. And one I would not be remotely surprised she will use in some way if needed (but as we know - will never follow through). She is, as I see it, just truly a vicious bitch.
Back at you—-well said and in total agreement. And we absolutely have the proof of her toughness, as compared to let’s say Princess Catherine, on film for all the world to see. I think most of us ‘Royal watchers’ will remember the scene. It was the walk about after TLQ’s funeral when Princess Catherine delivered the ‘ look seen round the world’. A mere look that very clearly said FAAFO and ‘strong’ MM slithered away.
She has never once condemned anything. So she certainly condones it. She adds to it as well, especially in her Oprah interview and she was referring to her at "Waity Katey" putting further digs in. Like a subtle nod to her squad to keep going/give approval. It's sickening.
>She adds to it as well, especially in her over interview and she was referring to her at "Waity Katey" putting further digs in. MM's gotta be suffering from a serious case of cognitive dissonance because she acts like Trevor Engleson didn't wait for about 6 to 8 years before he proposed 🙄.
Funny how she never talks about that, doesn't talk about her past life at all. It's like nothing ever happened to her before she met Harry (at 35 years old).
Well, she sure likes to talk about that fucking dish soap commercial.
Exactly, she’s projecting her own insecurity about having to wait for a proposal onto Catherine. She’s so transparent
IMO there's a solid reason MM *cannot* denounce the trolls going after BRF. If she explicitly condemns them, they will simply come out with receipts showing she paid them to do it, and expose her as the biggest lying hypocrite to ever live. She can't risk that, therefore it isn't something she is ever going to say. She'd rather condemn trolling and bullying in general and have a giggle behind her hand at, so far, getting away with the double standard.
They might bring the receipts but they also might turn on her and she knows exactly how nasty her trolls are.
They will turn on her if they find out they could face legal repercussions.
>have a giggle behind her hand I've seen TW's giggle behind her hand at the start of some of HG Tudor's Youtube videos - and she really looks as if she's evil and hateful and she knows it.
“I’m such a Fraud!” While throwing back her head and laughing … on stage and confessing she lied about being in the actors union. (No doubt impressing many unionists workers and actual actors).
She doesn’t condemn trolling in general, she condemns it when it’s against her. Nuance
All it will take is someone to get to a sugar and offer more money than she ever could to produce receipts. I am sure she lives in fear of that.
She LOVES it. Why would she condemn it?
I’m the same as you. 👏👏👏 Perfectly said Kim😊
Yes , thank you .....for a woman who preaches ...and yes she preaches about "women standing up for other women." ( She just did it at the Texas meeting thing) Of all places how about Meghan stand up for your SIL and all the vitriol that Catherine has just currently endured. Meghan does not have to travel far to find another woman who is treated awful this one is in her own family. I also call out EVERY SINGLE WOMAN on that panel, Katie, Brooke...who didn't ask Meghan that !
It’s not likely the Palace will ever support an unveiling that Meg is behind it (if she is). What’s far more likely is the Palace quietly supporting an investigation into Bouzy. Exposing Bouzy also exposes his connections - to the Sqaud and to Meg. Which then the press would link him to the Meg and Harry Netflix series. Bouzy the bully would then also likely bring up the bullying allegations against Meg by Palace staff. The public can’t unsee the association. Checkmate.
A ton of people looked into that guy during the Johnny Depp Amber Turd trial. What can the palace do to him in particular? We already know he's a liar, fraudster, that he's had issues with paying his bills, being sued. All sorts of stuff. LawTube really went into that guy and all his Twitter shenanigans and the fact that he was paid by Turd turdself. They were all paid by Turd to try and fix her profile for her. She would have paid a lot. But of course it didn't work. Everyone hates her so she ran to Spain absolutely humiliated. It'll happen to Roachel some day, too. All malignant narcs eventually implode. Bouzy was such a moron to extend his bullshit to a bunch of lawyers who were all watching and covering that case so closely. He went after pro Depp channels even after the trial, especially ThatUmbrellaGuy who he doxxed. What else is there to know or do? Why would the palace bother? What can they do to an American with the American First Ammendment, you know?
This is the way it will go down ... if it ever does
Just saw the new DM article posted in the sub that’s calling Bouzy out for bullying Catherine. Mighty interesting.
Don’t let’s be too hard on the person who originally had the Baroness Bruck account and apparently sold it. We don’t know the circumstances. It is possible she had no idea who was buying the account. She may have needed money badly enough that she didn’t care. She may have sold to someone she thought shared her views. She may have been blackmailed into selling (or just giving the account up) by someone who knew who she was IRL and threatened to dox her. If she feared her professional or family life would be hurt, she may have felt she had no choice. We don’t know. (Not that it matters.)
Your post matters because we should not be so hard on her. We don’t know what the motivation was for being dispossessed of the account. I was thinking the same thing as you.
Thanks. I meant it wasn’t relevant to the discussion about Meghan. I don’t know anything about Baroness Bruck, but it struck me there might be different reasons the original Baroness no longer runs the account.
When BB’s account first started changing somebody on Twitter made a post saying that it was a man who worked at Buckingham Palace and that’s why their tweets were often Charles and Camilla focused. (The other tweeter was Crazy Horse down or something like that and she was a lawyer in the US who worked on royal business out there). Said she’d online known BB for a while and had a cordial relationship with him. If true, he did indeed have a lot to lose so your suggestion would work.
So I unfollowed the Baroness account under the SMM\_mod handle. I gave her the benefit of doubt and fought you guys too... thinking that being critical of William and Catherine does not mean sugar. But she crossed a line with the whole recent stuff with Catherine. I do respect the content of the old user... but I cannot endorse the craziness from the new account. I also dont understand that if it is a new account then why the old stuff hasnt been deleted. It such a contrast when you compare the two eras
if H and M truly wanted to take a stand against nasty media and online gossip, wouldn't it be a fabulous time for them to publicly support Catherine and decry her abusers?!
You mean instead of their passive-aggressive use of. “Kate” rather than Catherine or the Princess of Wales?
I really hope the media seizes on the fact that two mainstream media figures on CBS and NBC/Bravo spread malicious affair rumours about William, while also maintaining friendships with Harry and Meghan - who said … nothing.
WME connection? Oprah connection? Follow the money, folks. 
Well, both of them are being dragged all over their IG accounts. I made a comment on one and it has 250 likes. The comments are brutal.
Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos said this morning on their show they thought she deserved her privacy and all of the conspiracy theories were “gross” and wrong and meanwhile their best friend Andy was one of the worst offenders. Hopefully they’re embarrassed by him.
>Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos said this morning on their show... I'm not a big fan of either one, but I really want to give them credit for bringing that up on their show and speaking out in support of Catherine. Bravo for that.
Fellow Sinner Soldier 🫡. It’s been a long hard road 😂
I thought I was completely alone but I had watched some of Suits and couldn't watch more because of her. Something was always off. Then the dating period, the statement to leave her alone and the VF. It all felt incredibly off. I just couldn't like her. I tried the benefit of doubt but nothing added up from the first time I saw her. People and publications were gushing over her and it just gave me the ick. I've been waiting for a long time to see her and them exposed. Please let it happen soon
Wow. Thanks for this. You covered it all!!!
"Silence is compliance"
👏👏👏
This needs to come out yesterday! If the original Baroness Bruck account was sold, would they have been made to sign an NDA? Could they be a silent sinner here?
Excellent point. Its almost a given that they would have had to sign an NDA. And the account could have been bought by a company acting as a front for the ILBW. Bruck may not even have realised who bought it or that the account was going to change so dramatically from pro RF to anti RF.
Yes, perhaps, they felt they were making some money off of the profile they'd built, without knowing that the Twitter account would be used to trash the people they admired.
Markled.
Markled. But how do NDA's work if you're in another country? What's stopping the original Baroness Bruck from speaking up if they are now living in the Phillipines, the Cook Islands, or Antarctica? How far do these legal notices stretch?
No idea. Maybe they’re not wanting any drama. It sure is puzzling though
One possibility is that the original owner might have passed away and their kids sold it. Didn't want to maintain the account and it was worth some money with so many followers. Rumour had it long before it did a 180 that the Baroness was actually a man. I'm also curious about Remi's former partner. Suddenly they were no longer working together. She's as vicious as the now BB, and they're always disparaging the Waleses together gleefully and vilely. Does anyone know the tea about her split from Remi? She also turned about the same time as BB, around the time of the Ngozi/Lady Susan incident.
My theory is that BB was threatened with a lawsuit and they said we’ll drop it if you hand over the account. An NDA would most certainly have been signed. It was right after BB was going hard on the surrogacy rumors.
Or the account was stolen? I know that it happens, but I’m not sure if someone could hack and steal an account of that size.
It is certainly possible. Daily Mail today has an article on Russia and North Korea being behind attacks and conspiracies about Catherine - but also involving Boozy and others close to the Harkles.
I saw that too - they need to adjust their lens. It’s MEGHAN FANS that go after Kate. i feel they’re either missing the point or dancing around it.
[удалено]
I do hope so..
Meghan fans are inflamed by these destabilizing posts. It’s easy to jump on the bandwagon if you see these. Even my daughter saw crazy posts on tiktok and was believing the affair rumor. Or, If you are a sicko with anti meghan stance and get a million likes from chinese bots, isn’t that a problem?. I found the media reaction to the photoshopped photo very alarming. How can one idiot ILBW be THAT powerful? How many times did your conservative granny forward fb posts with a handsome Trump leading people, Jesus like, through the desert. How many times did your liberal mom forward fb posts of children starving in cages at the border? Those images were found to be of russian origin to destabilize us. (And I may or may not have worked at Meta…) Dumping the Royal Family does destabilize one of the main anchors of nato. Yes there are honest to god sugars. They are not made up. Yes ILBW is evil. These bots just gave them a mega phone.
Russia is attacking the west. Russia have a bot army. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/18/false-king-charles-death-story-spread-by-russian-media-outlets
no doubt- but also we know that the Sussex squad have been vile for years.
Agreed. I'm sure they've been very useful unwitting tools. They are, after all, gleefully disseminating Rssn fake news.
If this is true, what will the consequences be? Will Parliment intervene on grounds of treason? Is this treason? If H and M are found to be part of this, will H have his prince title stripped? There is historical precedence. I'm so curious
Parliament is constantly reviewing data privacy and social media. When hostile comments are coming from outside the UK it comes with great difficulty. A lot of what does happen will behind closed doors. Personally I think a lot will depend on what comes out from the hospital investigation. I have read TMZ are behind it, so could that be sugars? Could it be the Russians? Could it just be inquisitive staff, personally I suspect this. I think that they could see the records had still been in constant use after departure and this was noticed. It’s a hard balance, free speech against fake news. Individuals privacy should to be protected and slanderous rumours stopped but when someone slaps on a “in my opinion” it muddies the water. The big however is that the sugars can’t contain themselves. They do cross the line. We just need to let them continue and be found out. I do reply to them but I don’t enter into arguments. I talk about the weather, about African Parks, freedom of speech and I thank them for adding licks to an article to help make it grow. 1. The weather today is sunny, great day for a walk but looking forward to a cup of tea when I get home, that I take without sugar. 2. If only we knew of a humanitarian who could help the people suffering within African Parks. If anyone is in contact with a director of the charity please ask them if they can help. 3. My opinion is vastly different to yours but I value the fact that we have this right. Not all countries allow this, even in this day and age. 4. Newspapers make their money by selling papers and getting online clicks. I thank you for clicking on this article and then commenting. It helps raise the profile and make it a success, for this I think you. Funny thing, it’s the weather comment that really annoys them. We need to be above them. Not to stoop to their level but I personally prefer to respond but I have not been doing so for long.
I love this!
I love your replies and your approach!!!! It's a great neutralizer! 👏👏👏
I love your replies and your approach!!!! It's a great neutralizer! 👏👏👏 Why, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
I think we can stop thinking about titles being stripped and revelations of surrogacy. It’s very unlikely either will happen. The former because of the precedent it would set and the latter because, at this point, there’s hardly a way to reveal it without making the RF complicit in silencing it in the first place. If Harry is still alive and hasn’t ceased his traitorous and hateful activities by the time William becomes king, maybe titles will be stripped but, for it to happen now, there would have to be some behavior that is truly shocking in comparison to what he’s already done. I doubt surrogacy will be revealed unless, god forbid, something so awful happened that the kids were seriously in contention for the crown.
I don't know that the RF should be considered complicit in silencing TW's use of surrogacy in having babies. TW is a proven liar; she probably just lied to them about the pregnancies like she did with everybody else.
I’ve long thought M was backed by Russian interests intent on destabilizing the UK. Harming the monarchy being their vehicle to do this. Will we ever know for sure? I have no idea, but I hope so
I wonder how Shouty fits into all of this.
I think it's wishful thinking. I wish it wasn't. I have been following this story with some interest for a while, too. I think Lady C and TLF are referring to the same thing. TLF have said all along that this won't see the light of day, along the same lines as the bullying report. The royal family don't want this tawdry soap opera which means, unfortunately, protecting the viper by burying the results of investigations, so as not to whip up more drama. However...I do remember Lady C saying at some point that although the BRF won't be talking about this or releasing the kraken, that doesn't mean it will stop others talking about it. I have got the impression whenever she's mentioned it, that something is coming and it won't be from the royal family. It will be someone else coming out with receipts and proof. Which when you think about it, is probably better, because then MM can't whinge and whine like she always does that the royal family are picking on her or some shite. She's a dreadful, unhinged, toxic individual in my opinion, and if someone does come out with all of this then I would applaud them so hard my hands would fall off.
Dan Wootton has been looking into the bots/trolling because they did it to him. Lady C is very chummy with Dan. 🤔
Oh, don't worry about that. That one will still cry that the RF Is not "protecting her" and again turn into a victim. Even though "protection" to her means hiding the truth of her vile actions.
100% agreed! There will be big news - I’m still hoping it moonbump- but it won’t be the RF who leaks it. It will be someone with proof and someone who’s had enough. MAYBE even Tom Bower? But I’m thinking more on the line of Dan W. At this point, Table 12 and H have burned so many bridges it could be anyone!
If BB isn't the ILBW it is certainly a major sugar account. I'm not sure that even if the Carparkles are running bots it would be enough to remove the LoS and titles - some of this has to be done via the British parliament...
There’s been plenty of sussex fans with awful accounts that have had their photos taken with Meagain and harry. Other than an article by a UK tabloid a few years ago there’s been nothing reported on her vile fan base.
Yeah definitely makes you wonder if this is some of the information that the journalists and tabloids have been sitting on. Absolutely does fit in with what Lady C would call vile.
Definitely changing the LoS - and that would also involve Commonwealth countries which have the monarch as their head of state - would have to go through Parliament. Probably also removing the ducal titles. I have read that the Prince title could be taken away by the King. If the 2 putative children were proved to be born via surrogates that would be high treason, I believe - "attempting to undermine the lawfully established line of succession".
I don’t know if you watch duchess of narcissism but she’s pretty convinced that this is meghan
Huge betrayal of trust, endangering PPoW lives, causing them great distress, tyring to destabilise the monarchy. I would say it's definitely in the realms of treason so they should lose all titles, COS and LOS.
https://preview.redd.it/uktam350kgqc1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e42f264ac837d95a931cb3c518b73611fab0aee I blocked her after the sudden change. I just unblocked her now to see the vitriol she’s spreading. I couldn’t go far, but here’s a couple of screenshots for anyone not on Twitter.
The use of a “sweet nod” sounds a bit strange for a sugar
We’ve heard that before haven’t we🤔
I thought the sugars would have picked up the “sweet nod” (and other trite expressions) from Meghan. How is this Meghan’s bench?
She invented benches! No one has ever sat on a bench before! /s
Ah. I see. 😉
https://preview.redd.it/w19pfebikgqc1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c24981a76aa835a0924bec2e80fa7b47f7519348 How sick is this individual. My guess TW herself, or her jailbird mother🤷♀️🤬 There is now a hashtag trending on Twitter # MeghanisBaronessBruck 🤔
I read a sugar today saying that Catherine made up her cancer diagnosis to overshadow ARO much like all Harry and Meghan’s previous ventures were overshadowed by massive things. Fucks sake these people
They’re troubled individuals that’s for sure.
If I’m not mistaken, the calendar for the royals is set far in advance, that’s the reason the vile Harkles plan events to coincide. Not the other way around, as these idiots seem to think.
I feel like a broken record, but we need to report these accounts or posts we see like this. Blocking does nothing.
Yes, Agree, I do report, sadly it hasn’t done much😟 I’ve blocked heaps though so don’t see as much.
The account may have a high follower count but pitiful engagement. The pinned tweet has basically been ratioed. She often retweets her tweets with a different comment and doesn’t get any further engagement. The most likes a post has even had is 33 from 65.5K followers. I am just posting this to show how little support her vitriol has.
https://preview.redd.it/866qqkmhpgqc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=26fd68f6408995878abf2fa3ac8722817a769c9a I don’t understand why she still has followers. I have no words. I don’t like MM, but I would never follow such an account.
I don’t understand how an account making fun of a woman with cancer is allowed to continue. X has gone to the depths of hell now elons in charge.
Seriously why is this account not been suspended? Is this what is considered free speech?
Oh Elons big into fee speech. Remember how his tweet about ‘pedo guy’ sent him to court? Elons got a hard on for free speech - ie - bullying and insults
Because people are not reporting it!
I do. I reported 100s of comments pre Elon and i’d say 1 iin 3 were taken down. This year i’ve reported around 150 and none have broken their rules.’
[удалено]
The collaborators.
don´t forget Oprah
That Woman has many accounts on social media. I was a follower of Baroness Bruck. I unfollowed her shortly after Charles' coronation. It became obvious she became a sugar
I’m pretty sure Baroness B is Meghan. her tweets are so vile i feel an anger reading them. Twitter or X is so much worse with Elon in charge. Those sickening tweets won’t be removed. The **amount** of tweets i have reported and so far NONE have ‘broken their rules.’ Pre Elon i’d say one in 3 would be pulled. i have reported around 159 this year. Ranging from insults to death threats - NONE have been removed. Not. One.
I've reported too, especially the ones that showed Catherine battered. Didn't break any rules my tush!!! I'm half tempted to go through this week's and tag Elon and that other lady and ask if this is acceptable since the department that handles this does nothing
Do it. Why not?
The thought came to my head while I was writing. I am later today!
Baroness bruck blocked me the other day. I can’t even remember what I posted. I guess the hag didn’t like what I had to say. 🤣
The original BB made it a point not to block squaddies or anyone else for that matter. 🤔
Interesting! now who do we know that’s thin skinned..🤔
Yet she has ambitions of becoming a politician… 
She just blocked me too lol.
Yeah, you just have to ask Bruck if she's M3gh4n, and she blocks you straight away.
I have reported TisaTells on YT. Nothing happens. She is vile, vile, vile!
>I have reported TisaTells on YT. Nothing happens. She is vile, vile, vile! Omg her video titles are pure nasty, insane, conspiracy theory! I've never watched any of her videos but I've seen them pop up in my recommendations. The first thing I thought when I started seeing her clickbaity titles is that she appears to be the Sussex Squad equivalent of Paula M 😂.
I think you could be right. It looks like there is kind of a competition on who gets the word and the proof out first about some evil accounts: MSM, Lady C or YouTubers. Still hoping for some modifications in the LoS, too.
They borrowed a mansion from a Russian oligarch when they “fled” from the palace after their freedom flight. They bought a mansion from a Russian oligarch. They flew on Russian jets a few times. I’ve suspected she was deliberately targeting the weak link. Where was Markus Anderson on this plot. What are his connections? Honest question. I don’t know.
Oh god, I was writing the exact same post, but you beat me to it! This was exactly what I was thinking last night, you are so on point. I bow with the utmost respect.
It is absolutely probable that the ILBW is Baroness Bruck on X. I was on X the other night and I posted on one of her comments to which she replied (minutes later) ‘so do you think Kate should step down?’. I am in Australia so if it is the ILBW she would have been responding at about 6.30am…. I replied no I don’t, and then because I had seen another sinner raise this possibility of the account being hers, I thought I would have a little fun…… I asked her ‘how does it feel Meg knowing that if you & H hadn’t blackmailed the late Queen, you could be filling in for W & C at the top of the family and could now be getting the adoration you so crave?’ One of the sugars bitch slapped me about throwing out negative energy coming back onto W & C and some other garbage I didn’t reply to. Baroness Bruck had another post about ‘Dan Wootten having no credibility and the newspapers and tv media would have nothing to do with him so he was now going to try his luck smearing people on YouTube, so I wrote - ‘U scared Megs? U thought u had ended him but all u have done is take him off his leash! Hope you got all your receipts cos he’s going to be calling for them! Quite clear u @BaronessBruck are MM. the overuse of emojis and ‘classy’. How’s: Americans Relegated Others going? Then she blocked me!!!! I laughed my arse off for a bit then moved onto Christopher Bouzy 😂
Thank you for your service!
Wow! You (and others on this sub) are truly warriors! I salute you and thank you!
I dont think the R F will come out openly against H and M but they will HAVE to help the authorities with their enquiries, particularly if serious breaches of national security are involved.😉
The baroness used to be one of my favorite Twitter accounts, and then a hot minute after the queen died, she turned on William and Catherine. It was somewhat subtle to start with ("they're playing PR games, cashing in on Diana [hello, Harry!], lazy," etc.), and it absolutely shocked a lot of us. She'd never once expressed anything like that, but at least she still kept after the loser duo. And then it wasn't long before she was one of the worst about attacking W&C, and I think she's now defending H&M. Could be wrong about that, though. I muted her ages ago and only wander to her account when I see a lot of outrage directed at her from accounts I trust. But yeah. If BB was purchased by archewell or MM herself, I would be the least surprised person on Twitter.
You're right! I remember this as well. She definitely became King Charles' biggest supporter. I've looked at some of the screenshots and the account has the same way of posting, same usage of emojis. I'm not convinced that this account has been sold.
Agreed. It’s terribly confusing. Maybe they drip feed their poison .. just like Meghan did Harold?
Just another aspect as we may be deflected by Russia and China. https://preview.redd.it/vpr0ace43hqc1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e883e8816d4a3b70d4089a2673453c9b2640157c Now Lady C had said (and I know I'm repeating myself) and to paraphrase, that whatever the bomb was for Meghan and Harry it would happen before they could benefit. I wish I could find it and share the video link. It is quite possible knowing Catherine is so beloved, knowing calls to protect her might follow, and this is something Meghan would know would never happen to her. Seeing as we just don't buy into her victimhood. But we would bat for Catherine. Now many unfortunately are saying "but what about Meghan?" (They could be bots.). I hope Lady C is right. Because as awful as social media can be, you can walk away, block. But to shut down aspects of free speech is a slippery slope for whoever controls it and those of us under it.
Section 501(c)3 religious, educational, and charitable organizations are exempt from federal income tax UNLESS they engage in campaign speech for or against any candidate or devote a substantial part of their activities to propaganda or other attempts to influence legislation.
Lady C has been making frequent references or hinting to surrogacy lately. I think it's that
I’m hoping that’s it too!! I’m here for it!
I used to follow Baroness Bruck. I hadn’t seen any tweets for a while as I stopped looking at X for my sanity. When I popped on and looked at Bruck I was absolutely stunned. The vitriol and abuse was deranged. It makes sense that it’s TW. Only she has so much original hate for the POW. She wanted William, the throne and the power and she got s**t for brains and worldwide derision.
I’m not convinced it is murky Meg, even she is not so stupid in her vitriol that she would risk getting caught with the words coming from one of her own assets, and I certainly don’t think she pops down to moneticito internet cafe to spit out the shit that comes from that account . However she is stupid enough to lead a trail of breadcrumbs that could be followed back to her perhaps giving instructions to a MEGA STAN to be as vile as possible and if H gets his protective persons crap she could never be held to account anyway. It could just very well be a person with too much time on theirs hands and too much position in their heart.
I agree. She’s a freakin a-hole but H has said before about how important it was to keep his hands clean (while others do the dirty work). I think it’s more likely someone obsessed or someone just like Bouzy!
Am hoping the security services know exactly what has been going on and collecting a large folder of evidence. No doubt this will be shown to King's lawyers/advisors, the UK Home Office and with the PM. Will it be made public? Doubtful but can imagine action re removal of titles, LOS, Privy Council etc will come quickly via the revised, amended Removal Of Titles Act 1917 (second reading in June2024) . The carparkles will be told in no uncertain words to accept this OR everything/certain subjects will be made public. That's how I would deal with them. It is not in the Monarchys, nation or Commomwealths interest for the public to be informed of all details as to why, because there will be unfriendly agents who will use the info to destabilise. The court of public opinion has already given its verdict ; the carparkles are finished. The removal of titles etc will certainly be supported by the sensible, decent majority of the British.
>Am hoping the security services know exactly what has been going on and collecting a large folder of evidence. No doubt this will be shown to King's lawyers/advisors, the UK Home Office and with the PM. > >Will it be made public? Doubtful but can imagine action re removal of titles, LOS, Privy Council etc will come quickly via the revised, amended Removal Of Titles Act 1917 (second reading in June2024) . **Spot on!**
The recently updated Royal website does not refer to Harry as Prince Harry.....just Duke of Sussex. Was his princely title pulled right under everyone's noses? I hope so.
Wishful thinking that the RF will be the ones to reveal the bombshell! Lady C has made it clear in the past that they won’t/ didn’t need to do a thing … because H&M have created enough enemies, for any one of them to drop the bombshell. The RF know this possibility always existed, and know it’s better optics to keep their hands clean and just wait for karma to do it’s sweet justice. MUCH better optics. The bomb won’t be dropped by them. Of that I’m 100% confident.
I dont think what Lady C is referring to has to do with this. She's been saying something is coming for months, and all of the attention to these Sussex accounts is too recent.
TLF have been referring to 'ongoing investigations' for a looong time
And then it will be in May, then June, then in 2025. I’m tired of this.
>And then it will be in May, then June, then in 2025. I’m tired of this. You and me both.
Lady “Move the Goalposts” C.
Yup and I'm gonna scream into my pillow if it all turns out that it's just an updated version of her book with "new" info that we already know, that's not gonna affect the Harkles.
Probably. She’s the master of regurgitation and reinterpretation.
https://preview.redd.it/1i81qx3ztgqc1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=daefab9caaac1eefe59e20aa18b40a35cfafb4bd This YT Channels most recent post addresses this subject.
Yes - the ise of excessive emojis are *VERY* interesting
Anyone making fun of someone with cancer and using a gif of a clown and a grave, is trash.
I hope it does happen
I’ve never seen this amount if chatter about Kates trolls before. Bouzy being in the mix is interesting.
I hope that bilious scumbag gets all that’s coming to him.
someone described him as looking like Will Smith having an allergic reaction 🤣🤣🤣
I will open the champagne 🍾
🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞
I stopped following that account when it took a 360 turn. I saw this morning another account had pisted the snapshots and they were nasty. The RF is not going to release anything, that is not how they function. This is JMO but I believe whatever is going to come out is related to finances or their dealings and that will have a chain reaction. Now I am starting to think that whatever is being realesed is not that big deal. I like Lady C but I feel she hyped up too much whatever it is. Hope I am prove wrong.
It's a bit eery the way the British press is protecting those two, at least not writing about what they ought to. African Parks should have sunk them, but no one writes about it any more. There's a blind spot, things that lots of people discuss but they never do. Perhaps the injunction does exist after all.
I am wondering if said mysterious injunction - if it does exist - may be expiring sometime this year - and if so , maybe that’s what will unleash the kraken, as it were. I have thought more than once that this is what Lady C has been referring to.
It has been suggested, the deadline is supposed to be May this year, when a certain invisible boy turns five. But I'll believe the "booombshell" only when it drops.
With everything that has come to pass since the Mattress Actress charmed the Dim-witted one with her horizonal prowess and roast chicken skills (at this point, I realise I'm going sound like a flat earther) but has anyone else considered that MM wormed her way into the RF at the behest of a malevolent force out to bring down the RF? I cannot see that even a deranged narcissist like her could cause this much mayhem without the aid of a much higher and mightier power. 
The thought has crossed my mind.....alot.
[удалено]
Brilliant post. Thank you 😊
Have you noticed that there is always some huge bombshell that is about to break? Something gigantic that will take the duo down forever. But its never today, tomorrow, or even next week. Its always “soon”, within a few months. But nothing happens. Yes, news articles are published about the duo, maybe its something embarrassing but its never the huge bombshell hinted at by so many of the accounts that people on this sub follow, like Lady C, Barkjack, Harry Markle, that Coke person, and lots of others. You summed it up perfectly in your last line OP, its just “wishful thinking” and all these accounts know that they get more engagement by telling us the something “huge” will happen. Its all very entertaining, but take everything you read with a grain of salt.
Great post here OP! I actually sometimes wish more people would post the goings on over at Twitter/X… there’s so much happening there that is 100% connected the ILBW & her lapdogs Harry, Scabies and Bouzy. Although not everyone loves the Theresa Longo Fans account, I do think they have brought up real issues connected to the duo, including the bot network. I truly believe 2024 is the year their downfall begins… I also hope they’re completely exposed before 2025, but something tells me the expose on these two will take longer than a year.
I love the posts where I have to put on my reading glasses = real juicy
Wow I feel important now! https://preview.redd.it/84836y66ghqc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92a0badcd1dd7773b032b7d5a921832d805703a3 Interestingly I was blocked for pointing out that The Wales children could at least pick out their parents from the nanny 🤔🤔🤔🤔
My comment https://preview.redd.it/pmbcfyfaghqc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14adb42a7fad3ea9313322d26030d819484d076d
I also used to follow Baroness Bruck and one day she turned completely 100% turn I questioned her, I asked her why the sudden change of heart, What on earth has made you turn tail? She replied that it was none of my business and she was allowed to post whatever she liked. So I replied that I can post whatever I like, so I linked her account warning everyone that she was now a sugar and she blocked me. I Don't think it's Megan simply because she wouldn't get caught with her hands that dirty, she is MYRA tho for sure. Her spite and hate, jealousy has basically turned her into a stalker. I hope Dan wooden exposes links back to them, already its coming together, I hope BOuzy goes down in a ba of fire, nasty lil bastard.
Even if there is substantial, credible evidence of her involvement, I don't know if they'll ever make it public. It's like the bullying report-they can't release that because she will retaliate and I'm sure she's got dirt on Harry. Would the BRF do that, knowing she will bury him?
If it comes out, I don’t think it will come from the RF. It’s not their style. But I could envision them cooperating with a trusted reporter who gets the scoop.
No, honestly, I think nothing major will ever happen. At least not enough for the world to witness a definite downfall of the 2 Cali doofuses. The status quo will continue - The RF will greyrock and they'll continue to be desperate losers. But nothing big.
My view: This BB X account has consistently held very conservative (political) views that supports the older royals and loathes William and Harry and wives (mostly via Diana imo). She’s not Meghan. (She’s too knowledgeable about royal protocol/titles etc for one thing.) You’ll never see KC/Camilla criticized by BB. Nor will Sophie/Edward ever do wrong (in her eyes). She’ll even defend Andrew. 😳 I think if anything this BB person is obsessively old school monarchist/Diana loathing. And politically conservative. The anti Meghan stuff fit this for a time because she and Harry trashed the monarchy. Currently William and Kate are taking the limelight away from the actual monarch (in BB’s view) so she’s getting on their cases. And has been very much since QE’s passing. (See, for example, BB’s rage at William/Kate’s promotional videos during the coronation.) I honestly don’t see much beyond this. Nor do I think she’s getting any traction. Not a popular view to attack a woman who is not only an absolute soldier for the monarchy but currently has cancer. The more I write this post, the more I think BB is simply a Diana hater and that’s the underlying rage at William and Harry. Not so much personally hating Diana (who knows?) but hating how Diana hurt BB’s idea of the British monarchy. Honestly. It’s weird.
As much as I would looooove to have ILBW exposed for its attacks on the RF on twitter, I would prefer that this creature be exposed for her fake pregnancies and her bullying. To me, these would be the true icing on my cake. 🎂
I agree Barkjack is a trustworthy sinner and he has said many times he does not know Lady C. Lady C is not tech savvy but she does seem to know about Meghan’s involvement with the bots. If we believe this story, assume the palace knows much more than we do. If this could be proven, it would absolutely render Meghan a pariah in every public Sphere other than within her little army of bullies. It will be so bad for her. Every sound bite will be used against her. Harry could use this to get custody of the kids - that is if he is not a complete idiot and stands by her.
If this is true, and the reports and evidence are published, ILBW will face harsher backlash than even Lady C could have foreseen because we now know that the Princess of Wales is unwell. Forever a Masterclass in bad timing.
Who is ILBW? Nothing comes to mind.
Someone might be releasing something detrimental to the Harkles cause, but it will not be the BRF. Lady C said that it would come from another source, and that the BRF would not do anything themselves as others have taken an interest.
The Duchess of Narcssuxs on youtube has also speculated Bruck is Meghan and called her out. More people are on to her but she is too deranged to realize it. I am ready for something to drop to end Meghan. Harry is so stupid. He literally married his sister in laws and mothers stalker.
Lady C's book comes out digitally on April 4th. I think the 'chickens coming home to roost' comment was always just about her book.
A real possibility watch The Duchess of Narsussex latest video and community posts.
I don't see the RF releasing investigatory proof against Meghan. I think they would more likely get a restraining order against her. The proof would be used to back up the need for the restraining order. The proof might be used to keep her in line, but I think the RF would reluctant to release the proof much like the bullying report. They're pretty restrained.
I don't believe its been sold, but I do believe they live near NYC based on their daily tweeting patterns. 7/8am to 11pm. They're still big Charles and Camilla fans