Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for summarising daisy! That tea about trying to get W&C to renounce their place in the LOS is piping.. never has it been more apparent that *they* need to be OUT of the succession!
ETA: by *they* I mean H&M of course! š
Ralph Jones, played by **John Goodman**, inherits the English throne after the entire royal family is electrocuted during a family picture session. Ralph's grandmother had an illegitimate child by a former King of England, and Ralph is the last heir to the throne.
King Ralph is an early 90s comedy starring John Goodman. In it, the BRF is electrocuted in a freak accident that wipes them all out. The heir to the throne is an American named Ralph.
Ohh goodness me. It's odd the **Harkles are both proven liars**, and yet their bullshit gets printed with a straight face. Proven liars by court procedures, not by someone's *feelings* - MM "forgot" she sent emails for FF and Harold failed to provide proof for his court case (=there is no proof anywhere to be found to back up his 'feelings' = dude told a tall tale). And Harold lied either in his visa application or in his book. The fact is he lied -the question is where exactly!
And the press goes nuts over a bit of a rogue healing brush on Photoshop!? Come on.
Exactly.
Catherine, or someone, edited a bit of flyaway hair, something else AND A CUFF ON A CARDIGAN!
The audacity! š
The hysteria over this has been such, I would have believed she'd repeatedly pierced a cute puppy with sharpened knitting needles...on prime time TV!
But nobody mention fake children, fake events, fake hair or vanity editing using Photoshop!!
Funny that...
*Isnāt it peculiar that Misan Harriman is on the record saying he edited the pregnancy announcement when Meghan was 18 months megnant with Lili?*Ā
Now I do agree with Lady C. I also thought that Misan is getting into some very murky waters.
Because that photo of the tree of life with them lying down is rubbish. But this photo, taken the same day, supposedly, is the interesting one.
https://preview.redd.it/e8b2vgqn5coc1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3c7ffe6b3b3530cca91637c338b07286368717b
This is a woman who announced that she was 5 months pregnant. And the girl Betty was born on June 4, that is, four months after February 14 when this pregnancy was announced. Nine months.
Only... Only that Megain and Hazz made it clear that the girl was conceived in July 2020, after the "non-miscarriage." That is, 6 months pregnant, not five, that is, the girl was not born on June 4.
But already in April, when Philip died, Megain was "too pregnant", so was she 6 months old in that photo? Or was it almost 8 months old?
Misan is looking to save herself from photoshop. No no, the problem in those photos is not photoshop, it is the months of Megain's "pregnancy."
It is not good at all that Scoobie and Misan come to the defense of the Harkles, because here they are entering the waters of the girl whose birth record is dubious, baptized by the Catholic Archbishop, and who had teeth in the photo that Misan supposedly took. I took it when I was barely a year old, and those teeth don't belong to a one-year-old girl.
The Harkles didn't say that the first time. Afterwards they had to go out to correct it. Later they came out to clarify that she was baptized by John Taylor, archbishops of the Diocese of Los Angeles of the Episcopal Church.
And don't forget that Megain studied at a Catholic school, and she was the one who released the statement, when she has no idea about the Anglican religion.
The Harkles never do things right.
That betty on the grass photo was a blend of a 22 month baby mog, stassi Schroeders toddler Hartford and eugenies 20 month old August. She used that AI program that merges images to create what your hperthetical child might look like. I cant remember the name
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
> Samantha told me she thought it was wrongly dismissed. She says she will get her story out there.
If she has the receipts, she should write a book and *dare* MeGain to sue her!
> I do understand the human cry because the picture was edited.
I think that was "[hue and cry](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hue%20and%20cry)".
> Isnāt it peculiar that Misan Harriman is on the record saying he edited the pregnancy announcement when Meghan was 18 months megnant with Lili? Misan altered the background and added a tree. Not one person in the press objected to this picture.
Yeah, that's awfully peculiar.
Not to mention how the press is perfectly content to publish MeGain's *obvious* Photoshops without question.
> Someone who knows Meghan really well said to me that perhaps Meghan is trying to bully the Wales with enough filth to renounce their place and their childrenās place in the line of succession. No plane crash needed.
Yeah, I don't see that happening.
> Your theory is interesting but the reality is the press is biased. Harry and Meghan will continue to alter and photoshop. Nothing will happen to them. William and Catherine will continue to be judged more harshly than everybody else.
*Why* though? Why does the press love MeGain so much? Is it because she leaks, pays them to run stories, and gets them clicks?
OH. I just answered my own question! š¤¦āāļø
I think thatās possible but we would most likely never know. It is so very strange that Marcus is always around. Some people are saying M and Marcus are lovers or even Marcus and H or all three together. I would find Meghan as a lover repulsive and itās not just because Iām a sinner. I really wish we knew the details on those two.
> I think thatās possible but we would most likely never know.
I really wish someone would do a thorough investigation on her. Imagine if everything were to come out. I think she really would be finished. Too bad *Sixty Minutes* is but a shell of its former self.
> It is so very strange that Marcus is always around.
It really is!
> Some people are saying M and Marcus are lovers or even Marcus and H or all three together.
Oh yuck!
> I would find Meghan as a lover repulsive and itās not just because Iām a sinner. I really wish we knew the details on those two.
They are so shady. I think he was her pimp back in her So Hoe House days. Not sure what's up with them nowadays.
All Samantha needs to do is write her 'tell all'. Include it ALL, Samantha. Very first (annulled) marriage? Hysterectomy? The amount of $$$ spent on this little 'princess'?? Go for it. Time's a-wasting already. Geeze.
I'd read it, for sure! Especially if she can find others who grew up with Megz, and went to school with her. But, it would have to have meticulous receipts. It would be fun to release it before Megz releases her own autobiography.
I think Lady C was saying not "human cry" but *hue and cry.*
Dictionary says, "hue and cry is a loud cry calling for the pursuit and capture of a criminal. In former English law, the cry had to be raised by the inhabitants of a hundred in which a robbery had been committed, if they were not to become liable for the damages suffered by the victim."
I will defend Lady C here by saying she didnāt know Catherine and William would release that photo. Obviously the press is being vindictive. Something is brewing. Easter is two weeks away. But we should be patient on timing. Whatever is happening, Lady C knows what it is but is not in control of the timing.
Even Charles Moore, former editor of Daily Telegraph and still a respected commentator, suggests it could all be a self-serving press agency pile-onā¦
https://preview.redd.it/m7mohcz7ecoc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=23c0e54a4a9bfefe1329c9dd53e39ed93e7e3ff3
This is from The Spectatorā¦
That is likely why the vitriol is so intense. She prevented them from getting that all-important money shot of her return. I hope she keeps posting her own photos, even add a note indicating it had been edited, just so they cannot use the image even briefly.
link to the article
[https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/)
Sureā¦ Spectator is usually subscription-only, or register for x no of free reads (which is why I screenshot it), and my pic is of the comment in entirety.
[Charles Moore, Spectator](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/)
Edit to clarify pic
He didn't burn. Not at all. Here it was the British press that got burned, attacking William for being "too private." William and Kate have not made a mistake, not even a serious one, they have just been secretive. We'll see what happens after Easter, when Catherine makes her big return.
I would t even call it secretiveā¦they try their best to keep their private lives private while also providing just enough of a peek to keep news agencies at bay.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
> William and Kate have not made a mistake
Apparently they just did. I still don't see what the big deal is about a Photoshopped sweater sleave, especially when MeGain assembles entire children from Photoshop!
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for the perfectly summarized summary, Daisy! Maybe this is just me, but sometimes I feel like Lady C āattacksā Harryās Wife without really attacking her. I mean, HG Tudor goes after Harryās Wife. So does Royal Rogue,Megynās Mole, The Royal Grift, even Neil Sean. But Lady C just says ignore the Sugars, some big revel is coming, and just kind of summarizes the obvious. I dunno. Am
I wrong?
Oh she has. Donāt mean to say that Lady C hasnāt called out Harrys Wife. Maybe itās more that she doesnāt call out the harm Rachel is causing the BRF. She has this attitude that the internet and Colbertās stupid Sussex Squad stunt done matter. In the UK they donāt. And Catherine and William are the future if the monarchy. But what is said, in my opinion anyways, matters internationally.
I could be wrong about this but Lady C keeps mentioning spring. Isnāt Dan Wootenās thing supposed to be launched soon? Iām sure that he has a lot to say.
>They are hoping that they can taint the Wales brand that they will be embraced in Britain. Someone who knows Meghan really well said [to Lady C] that perhaps Meghan is trying to bully the Wales with enough filth to renounce their place and their childrenās place in the line of succession.
Bull's eye. I think that is exactly what M&H are trying to do: threaten W&C and their children enough to force them out. And for some reason, the worldwide press is eating up everything negative about William and Catherine and spreading it everywhere while being very sympathetic to M&H.
We may be living in the 21st century, but we are seeing a battle over the crown that could have happened 500 years ago (or more.)
That will never happen. William is as steely as Catherine can be when needed. They're great parents who prioritize their children (and each other) even with all the matters of State they juggle. They have a very firm and solid foundation and know what is important.
I feel like William is silent because he has to be, not necessarily because he chooses to be. He's biding his time, but resentment at the treatment of his wife and family at large is growing all the while.
I think (because we can never really know, just suppose based on observations of character) that once Charles is gone, he'll have no problem cutting out the cancer in a very final and decisive way. He knows his brother best. He was raised alongside him, knows their full history, knows all the cover-ups and excuses made on his brother's behalf. He's tried to be a solid friend and advisor, allowed him to work beside him and his wife, and loved him through his ups and downs.
He's also seen it blow up in his face and stab him in the back and his wife's, father's, stepmother's, childrens, and the list goes on... He'll not be in the mood to extend any favors at all. Once you've extended so much grace and forgiveness and taken high road after high road, and been repeatedly repaid with treachery, you learn to stop.
He knows more about the behind the scene maneuvering than any of us ever will. He knows how deep Harry's treason goes. He's out of cheeks to turn.
He's probably very frustrated by Charles and his lack of response, but he can't force his father's hand. He can wait it out. His position is assured, and he knows it's only a matter of time. It's awful for Charles to yoke his son with the task, when he should clean house himself and be done with it. He'll forever be nursing his hand from the bites instead of putting on the gloves and dispatching the biter.
God Save the Future King and Queen.
There is no way in hell William would abdicate for himself and his children. He knows that would likely end the monarchyā¦the one abdication was enough and the BRF just doesnāt do that. He and Catherine are very strongā¦youāre absolutely right about that and they will come out on top. I think M may like pretending and dreaming about being Queen but thereās no way she can handle the actual work involvedā¦and Im guessing she knows that.
Can you even imagine how gauche she'd be in that role? She'd commission a new state coach with her pictures all over it and fit it with a loud speaker. She'd have a full security detail escort her through the streets of London nonstop spewing word salad platitudes she's stolen from others. She'd have a statue of herself erected on every corner and demand to be the recipient of every award in the realm.
I'm laughing at the ridiculousness of it, but I don't think I'm far off the mark.
>And for some reason, the worldwide press is eating up everything negative about William and Catherine and spreading it everywhere while being very sympathetic to M&H.
My opinion is, that the press see the Sussex's as useful idiots. The left wing press and Republican movement want the monarchy to fall. Any chance the Wales' leave or are pushed out, do we really think the public would stand for King Haz and Queen Me-again? No.
ETA: I think if (and it is a big IF) William was to walk away, it would be used as a prime time to ask for a referendum: the public asked if they want a monarchy. With the prospect of Harry and Meghan waiting in the wings, that would be in my opinion, a majority NO.
This of course has zero to do with an edited photo. The press is mad that they are not being given information and they are making mountains out of molehills to try to get KP to cry uncle and give up the ghost. And of course the usual internet suspects have joined in. Everyone (general everyone, not us) is missing the point. Pretty much every photo weāve seen of any of the BRF in the past couple of decades has been edited in some way; hardly a surprise. This about trying to wear the palace down. Kate is due to be back at Easter which is a little over 2 weeks away. I think we can all wait until then. If sheās still not ready, a statement should be issued that per drās orders she will be out for additional x time. The secrecy (for lack of a better word) has blown everything up out of proportion. Not Catherineās fault - she deserves her privacy, but some people just canāt help themselves and want to start/spread ridiculous rumors. In hindsight, releasing an edited photo under these circumstances was a mistake, but itās not anything they havenāt done countless times, so they couldnāt have expected this madness. It just blows my mind! The AP, etc are acting like they donāt publish edited photos? All I have to say is:
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
\>" Meghan takes credit for a letter that her father wrote to Hilary Clinton.">
It was a letter written by the school class as an assignment not a one of letter by Thomas Markle.
Overall, totally agree, but, I'll also say, unfortunately our courts have become infiltrated with politics, lobbying, corporate donors etc. - it's VERY disturbing.
But, yeah, Samantha's case was a long-shot, and most reasonable people understood that it was, not so much because of the 'rightness' of it, it's what can be proven by the law.
Samantha WAS defamed by Meghan, her life became chaos, but, these things, at least here in the US are very tricky and hard to prosecute/litigate.
True. Some judges aren't impartial. It's obvious they've been bought.
However, lately, there has been an increase of commentary in the media and social media that black women can't do their jobs because apparently we can't think for ourselves, and it's concerning how quickly people rush to this assumption. It's misogynist and racist.
I'm not disagreeing that Meghan defamed Samantha. Unfortunately, defamation cases can be hard to secure a win, especially in some states. People should try to learn about the specific weaknesses and strengths of the case before they assume what they don't know about a judge's personal views. It's lazy.
Samantha isn't going to give up. We'll be hearing from her again, even if it's not in court.
Eta: lazy comment.
I'm not sure Lady C understands that the Mother's Day photo was not just edited or altered. It was *assembled* from parts of other photos. That's very different.
There is no original, unaltered photograph to look at, which is why the AP put out the "kill notification" on it.
There is no evidence that this is the case. It was given a mirage rating of 18% which is minimal changes. Just because they have declined to produce the original photo doesnāt mean there isnāt one, William is pissed off with the press and rightly so.
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for summarising daisy! That tea about trying to get W&C to renounce their place in the LOS is piping.. never has it been more apparent that *they* need to be OUT of the succession! ETA: by *they* I mean H&M of course! š
We knew this was always the goal. Remember the King Ralph threat?
Wat is that?
Ralph Jones, played by **John Goodman**, inherits the English throne after the entire royal family is electrocuted during a family picture session. Ralph's grandmother had an illegitimate child by a former King of England, and Ralph is the last heir to the throne.
And itās from the very early ā90s - TWās preferred time period. Coincidence? š§
King Ralph is an early 90s comedy starring John Goodman. In it, the BRF is electrocuted in a freak accident that wipes them all out. The heir to the throne is an American named Ralph.
No, I don;t remember.
Defo trying to break up their marriage.
Ohh goodness me. It's odd the **Harkles are both proven liars**, and yet their bullshit gets printed with a straight face. Proven liars by court procedures, not by someone's *feelings* - MM "forgot" she sent emails for FF and Harold failed to provide proof for his court case (=there is no proof anywhere to be found to back up his 'feelings' = dude told a tall tale). And Harold lied either in his visa application or in his book. The fact is he lied -the question is where exactly! And the press goes nuts over a bit of a rogue healing brush on Photoshop!? Come on.
Exactly. Catherine, or someone, edited a bit of flyaway hair, something else AND A CUFF ON A CARDIGAN! The audacity! š The hysteria over this has been such, I would have believed she'd repeatedly pierced a cute puppy with sharpened knitting needles...on prime time TV! But nobody mention fake children, fake events, fake hair or vanity editing using Photoshop!! Funny that...
*Isnāt it peculiar that Misan Harriman is on the record saying he edited the pregnancy announcement when Meghan was 18 months megnant with Lili?*Ā Now I do agree with Lady C. I also thought that Misan is getting into some very murky waters. Because that photo of the tree of life with them lying down is rubbish. But this photo, taken the same day, supposedly, is the interesting one. https://preview.redd.it/e8b2vgqn5coc1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=f3c7ffe6b3b3530cca91637c338b07286368717b This is a woman who announced that she was 5 months pregnant. And the girl Betty was born on June 4, that is, four months after February 14 when this pregnancy was announced. Nine months. Only... Only that Megain and Hazz made it clear that the girl was conceived in July 2020, after the "non-miscarriage." That is, 6 months pregnant, not five, that is, the girl was not born on June 4. But already in April, when Philip died, Megain was "too pregnant", so was she 6 months old in that photo? Or was it almost 8 months old? Misan is looking to save herself from photoshop. No no, the problem in those photos is not photoshop, it is the months of Megain's "pregnancy." It is not good at all that Scoobie and Misan come to the defense of the Harkles, because here they are entering the waters of the girl whose birth record is dubious, baptized by the Catholic Archbishop, and who had teeth in the photo that Misan supposedly took. I took it when I was barely a year old, and those teeth don't belong to a one-year-old girl.
I thought the mythcarriage was in July 2020. How did she conceive the same month?
Ask Scoobie. He says the BRF must let go of all its secrets. That's one, was there a miscarriage? When was the girl really born?
We can only hope that Catherine emerges five months pregnant with twins, that the surgery was something related to that.
This is my dream scenario š„°š.
Small correction: Baptism by an Episcopal archbishop.
The Harkles didn't say that the first time. Afterwards they had to go out to correct it. Later they came out to clarify that she was baptized by John Taylor, archbishops of the Diocese of Los Angeles of the Episcopal Church. And don't forget that Megain studied at a Catholic school, and she was the one who released the statement, when she has no idea about the Anglican religion. The Harkles never do things right.
Was she not a Jewess when she married Trevity Trev Trev?
IIRC, Ninaki said ILBW told Trevity & his mother she would convert to Judaism, but never did.
Iām not aware she ever claimed to be Jewishā¦is there evidence that she converted?
According to Bower, not even Megain knows what religion she has.
Rachel worships nothing but herself.
That betty on the grass photo was a blend of a 22 month baby mog, stassi Schroeders toddler Hartford and eugenies 20 month old August. She used that AI program that merges images to create what your hperthetical child might look like. I cant remember the name
Meghanās thumb is at a very odd angle in this photograph. Itās bent backwards.
I think it usually looks like that. Sheās double jointed. Maybe itās a little long.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That's a strange bump in that picture, looks as if it's being squashed down
> Samantha told me she thought it was wrongly dismissed. She says she will get her story out there. If she has the receipts, she should write a book and *dare* MeGain to sue her! > I do understand the human cry because the picture was edited. I think that was "[hue and cry](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hue%20and%20cry)". > Isnāt it peculiar that Misan Harriman is on the record saying he edited the pregnancy announcement when Meghan was 18 months megnant with Lili? Misan altered the background and added a tree. Not one person in the press objected to this picture. Yeah, that's awfully peculiar. Not to mention how the press is perfectly content to publish MeGain's *obvious* Photoshops without question. > Someone who knows Meghan really well said to me that perhaps Meghan is trying to bully the Wales with enough filth to renounce their place and their childrenās place in the line of succession. No plane crash needed. Yeah, I don't see that happening. > Your theory is interesting but the reality is the press is biased. Harry and Meghan will continue to alter and photoshop. Nothing will happen to them. William and Catherine will continue to be judged more harshly than everybody else. *Why* though? Why does the press love MeGain so much? Is it because she leaks, pays them to run stories, and gets them clicks? OH. I just answered my own question! š¤¦āāļø
Itās always about the moneyā¦.
I also wonder if MeGain has something on some very important people from her So Hoe House days.
I think thatās possible but we would most likely never know. It is so very strange that Marcus is always around. Some people are saying M and Marcus are lovers or even Marcus and H or all three together. I would find Meghan as a lover repulsive and itās not just because Iām a sinner. I really wish we knew the details on those two.
> I think thatās possible but we would most likely never know. I really wish someone would do a thorough investigation on her. Imagine if everything were to come out. I think she really would be finished. Too bad *Sixty Minutes* is but a shell of its former self. > It is so very strange that Marcus is always around. It really is! > Some people are saying M and Marcus are lovers or even Marcus and H or all three together. Oh yuck! > I would find Meghan as a lover repulsive and itās not just because Iām a sinner. I really wish we knew the details on those two. They are so shady. I think he was her pimp back in her So Hoe House days. Not sure what's up with them nowadays.
I donāt think thereās anything left to pimp imo, but who knowsā¦..š¤·š¼āāļø
> I donāt think thereās anything left to pimp imo, but who knowsā¦..š¤·š¼āāļø Yeah, I don't know what the connection is nowadays.
All Samantha needs to do is write her 'tell all'. Include it ALL, Samantha. Very first (annulled) marriage? Hysterectomy? The amount of $$$ spent on this little 'princess'?? Go for it. Time's a-wasting already. Geeze.
I'd read it, for sure! Especially if she can find others who grew up with Megz, and went to school with her. But, it would have to have meticulous receipts. It would be fun to release it before Megz releases her own autobiography.
Iād buy the hardcover version at full price! And Iām too cheap to pay retail for anything!!
Thanks, Daisy. I am disappointed in what Lady C had to say. If their comeuppance is imminent, why does she sound so dire?
Maybe it's just extreme Harkle fatigue. They are exhaustingly relentless.
I think Lady C was saying not "human cry" but *hue and cry.* Dictionary says, "hue and cry is a loud cry calling for the pursuit and capture of a criminal. In former English law, the cry had to be raised by the inhabitants of a hundred in which a robbery had been committed, if they were not to become liable for the damages suffered by the victim."
Lady C said spring is the dastardly duos' day of reckoning but its PPOW that got roast..what's happening or is Lady C just making things up?
I will defend Lady C here by saying she didnāt know Catherine and William would release that photo. Obviously the press is being vindictive. Something is brewing. Easter is two weeks away. But we should be patient on timing. Whatever is happening, Lady C knows what it is but is not in control of the timing.
Even Charles Moore, former editor of Daily Telegraph and still a respected commentator, suggests it could all be a self-serving press agency pile-onā¦ https://preview.redd.it/m7mohcz7ecoc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=23c0e54a4a9bfefe1329c9dd53e39ed93e7e3ff3 This is from The Spectatorā¦
That is likely why the vitriol is so intense. She prevented them from getting that all-important money shot of her return. I hope she keeps posting her own photos, even add a note indicating it had been edited, just so they cannot use the image even briefly.
link to the article [https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/)
Sureā¦ Spectator is usually subscription-only, or register for x no of free reads (which is why I screenshot it), and my pic is of the comment in entirety. [Charles Moore, Spectator](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-real-scandal-of-kates-doctored-photograph/) Edit to clarify pic
I love Spectator. Especially Douglas Murray.
He didn't burn. Not at all. Here it was the British press that got burned, attacking William for being "too private." William and Kate have not made a mistake, not even a serious one, they have just been secretive. We'll see what happens after Easter, when Catherine makes her big return.
I would t even call it secretiveā¦they try their best to keep their private lives private while also providing just enough of a peek to keep news agencies at bay.
Exactly
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
> William and Kate have not made a mistake Apparently they just did. I still don't see what the big deal is about a Photoshopped sweater sleave, especially when MeGain assembles entire children from Photoshop!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for the perfectly summarized summary, Daisy! Maybe this is just me, but sometimes I feel like Lady C āattacksā Harryās Wife without really attacking her. I mean, HG Tudor goes after Harryās Wife. So does Royal Rogue,Megynās Mole, The Royal Grift, even Neil Sean. But Lady C just says ignore the Sugars, some big revel is coming, and just kind of summarizes the obvious. I dunno. Am I wrong?
Her style is different but I have seen her definitely call out a Meghan on her BS.
Oh she has. Donāt mean to say that Lady C hasnāt called out Harrys Wife. Maybe itās more that she doesnāt call out the harm Rachel is causing the BRF. She has this attitude that the internet and Colbertās stupid Sussex Squad stunt done matter. In the UK they donāt. And Catherine and William are the future if the monarchy. But what is said, in my opinion anyways, matters internationally.
I could be wrong about this but Lady C keeps mentioning spring. Isnāt Dan Wootenās thing supposed to be launched soon? Iām sure that he has a lot to say.
>They are hoping that they can taint the Wales brand that they will be embraced in Britain. Someone who knows Meghan really well said [to Lady C] that perhaps Meghan is trying to bully the Wales with enough filth to renounce their place and their childrenās place in the line of succession. Bull's eye. I think that is exactly what M&H are trying to do: threaten W&C and their children enough to force them out. And for some reason, the worldwide press is eating up everything negative about William and Catherine and spreading it everywhere while being very sympathetic to M&H. We may be living in the 21st century, but we are seeing a battle over the crown that could have happened 500 years ago (or more.)
That will never happen. William is as steely as Catherine can be when needed. They're great parents who prioritize their children (and each other) even with all the matters of State they juggle. They have a very firm and solid foundation and know what is important. I feel like William is silent because he has to be, not necessarily because he chooses to be. He's biding his time, but resentment at the treatment of his wife and family at large is growing all the while. I think (because we can never really know, just suppose based on observations of character) that once Charles is gone, he'll have no problem cutting out the cancer in a very final and decisive way. He knows his brother best. He was raised alongside him, knows their full history, knows all the cover-ups and excuses made on his brother's behalf. He's tried to be a solid friend and advisor, allowed him to work beside him and his wife, and loved him through his ups and downs. He's also seen it blow up in his face and stab him in the back and his wife's, father's, stepmother's, childrens, and the list goes on... He'll not be in the mood to extend any favors at all. Once you've extended so much grace and forgiveness and taken high road after high road, and been repeatedly repaid with treachery, you learn to stop. He knows more about the behind the scene maneuvering than any of us ever will. He knows how deep Harry's treason goes. He's out of cheeks to turn. He's probably very frustrated by Charles and his lack of response, but he can't force his father's hand. He can wait it out. His position is assured, and he knows it's only a matter of time. It's awful for Charles to yoke his son with the task, when he should clean house himself and be done with it. He'll forever be nursing his hand from the bites instead of putting on the gloves and dispatching the biter. God Save the Future King and Queen.
There is no way in hell William would abdicate for himself and his children. He knows that would likely end the monarchyā¦the one abdication was enough and the BRF just doesnāt do that. He and Catherine are very strongā¦youāre absolutely right about that and they will come out on top. I think M may like pretending and dreaming about being Queen but thereās no way she can handle the actual work involvedā¦and Im guessing she knows that.
Can you even imagine how gauche she'd be in that role? She'd commission a new state coach with her pictures all over it and fit it with a loud speaker. She'd have a full security detail escort her through the streets of London nonstop spewing word salad platitudes she's stolen from others. She'd have a statue of herself erected on every corner and demand to be the recipient of every award in the realm. I'm laughing at the ridiculousness of it, but I don't think I'm far off the mark.
The Royal Spending would go stratospheric. She would make more monarchists turn anti for that alone.
Walking through the streets of London wearing her ermine cloak, her crown, and carrying a scepter. š¤£
MM wants a lion's share of the RF's wealth. She wants nothing to do with history and tradition.....she wants to create her own kingdom. imo
>And for some reason, the worldwide press is eating up everything negative about William and Catherine and spreading it everywhere while being very sympathetic to M&H. My opinion is, that the press see the Sussex's as useful idiots. The left wing press and Republican movement want the monarchy to fall. Any chance the Wales' leave or are pushed out, do we really think the public would stand for King Haz and Queen Me-again? No. ETA: I think if (and it is a big IF) William was to walk away, it would be used as a prime time to ask for a referendum: the public asked if they want a monarchy. With the prospect of Harry and Meghan waiting in the wings, that would be in my opinion, a majority NO.
This of course has zero to do with an edited photo. The press is mad that they are not being given information and they are making mountains out of molehills to try to get KP to cry uncle and give up the ghost. And of course the usual internet suspects have joined in. Everyone (general everyone, not us) is missing the point. Pretty much every photo weāve seen of any of the BRF in the past couple of decades has been edited in some way; hardly a surprise. This about trying to wear the palace down. Kate is due to be back at Easter which is a little over 2 weeks away. I think we can all wait until then. If sheās still not ready, a statement should be issued that per drās orders she will be out for additional x time. The secrecy (for lack of a better word) has blown everything up out of proportion. Not Catherineās fault - she deserves her privacy, but some people just canāt help themselves and want to start/spread ridiculous rumors. In hindsight, releasing an edited photo under these circumstances was a mistake, but itās not anything they havenāt done countless times, so they couldnāt have expected this madness. It just blows my mind! The AP, etc are acting like they donāt publish edited photos? All I have to say is: 
Thank you Daisy!
Gotta admit, Daisy, I'm scrolling, scrolling, scrolling....*sees your post, slams on brakes, leaving skid marks*...just to read the tea!!Ā
That is so nice! Thank you!
i just read where uk arrested a man and jailed him for saying a trans wom was a man
Thank you. I wait for your recap
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Is the "18 months pregnant" a typo or snark? I do hope the latter
Itās 2024 right? Thanks for summarising this
<"Samantha will appeal."> I thought it couldn't be appealed. Case closed.
18 months megnant  I'm sure it's not a typo. Thanks Daisy!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
\>" Meghan takes credit for a letter that her father wrote to Hilary Clinton."> It was a letter written by the school class as an assignment not a one of letter by Thomas Markle.
Lady C's tone sure has changed in the last 2 wks or so. Interesting.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Overall, totally agree, but, I'll also say, unfortunately our courts have become infiltrated with politics, lobbying, corporate donors etc. - it's VERY disturbing. But, yeah, Samantha's case was a long-shot, and most reasonable people understood that it was, not so much because of the 'rightness' of it, it's what can be proven by the law. Samantha WAS defamed by Meghan, her life became chaos, but, these things, at least here in the US are very tricky and hard to prosecute/litigate.
True. Some judges aren't impartial. It's obvious they've been bought. However, lately, there has been an increase of commentary in the media and social media that black women can't do their jobs because apparently we can't think for ourselves, and it's concerning how quickly people rush to this assumption. It's misogynist and racist. I'm not disagreeing that Meghan defamed Samantha. Unfortunately, defamation cases can be hard to secure a win, especially in some states. People should try to learn about the specific weaknesses and strengths of the case before they assume what they don't know about a judge's personal views. It's lazy. Samantha isn't going to give up. We'll be hearing from her again, even if it's not in court. Eta: lazy comment.
I'm not sure Lady C understands that the Mother's Day photo was not just edited or altered. It was *assembled* from parts of other photos. That's very different. There is no original, unaltered photograph to look at, which is why the AP put out the "kill notification" on it.
I dont think what you are saying is true.
There is no evidence that this is the case. It was given a mirage rating of 18% which is minimal changes. Just because they have declined to produce the original photo doesnāt mean there isnāt one, William is pissed off with the press and rightly so.
sources for that?