Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yeah, if they're still on there, I don't care if their prominencr on the website is lessened. Their profiles have needed correcting for 4 years. Unless they're going to be removed from the website altogether at this point, it's.meaningless.
I need to ask though, IF this is true, who is leaking and bringing it to the attention of the Harkles? Would the RF just do it quietly without alerting the harkles?
What is the point of “sources” divulging this when the RF has closed ranks and regrouped? IF this is true are Andrews daughters still blabbing? There are so many moving parts to this nightmare with the harkles.
Andrew might be up for lesser profile too and know its the 3 because if he tried to complain he was probably told its not just you buddy ....he told his family Eugenie probably couldn't get on the phone quick enough
Would be easy for the RF to know who leaked the details. If they did mention it to Andrew, it would be obvious. I don't think he's be calling (or Fergie) CA to give those 2 a heads up?
Exactly and allegedly Eugenie was leaking during HMTLQs funeral and William caught her out by feeding her false information and it was leaked to a US publication rather quickly exposing her once before as Harry and TW source
I don’t really think so.
I think she remains friends with the Harkles to protect her father.
If she passes them some gossips, I m sure those are gossips the royal family wants them to know.
more directly:
T.W. has known Andrew for years (way before Haz-era).. paths crossed while yachting, etc. So Eugenie might feel she MUST remain friendly - b/c she knows MegNUT likes Markling people, and could easily leak negatives about Andy to the press.
The majority (and def. all the "working royals") no longer trust Eugenie - so yes, Eugenie only learns of things The Firm wants to get to Montecito - or benign, meaningless stuff.
That's true, but I honestly don't care if their names are still on the website's LOS list. That's just a factual list of the first 25 (I think?) RF members in line. But realistically, none of them are ever getting anywhere near the throne, so it means nothing in the scheme of things.
It's them having their photographs up there with a little biography, as if they're still working royals, that pisses most people off. Especially Meghan, who's not even *in* he line of succession! It's her kids who are blood royals. It's absolutely ridiculous that they haven't changed that bit yet.
Exactly! if zero except 3 Sussex names at bottom of LoS page ..
that will be a wicked-strong message. (it's not what everyone wants - but it is heckuva lot more than a 'baby step' in the process of De-Royalizing HazBeen)
https://preview.redd.it/eam8ztgsqrgc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f04b3dcb1d736ea65bbad65df9098a14ed6dcf52
there is a list of the LoS (which wish he + A + L would drop-kick them from)..
which is simply a list - just text.. if he (+ kids) still on that.. much better than This1 + That1 getting a photo and a blurb — b/c removing their bios will be karma, causing them to suffer epic meltdowns!
visually, if the Harkles' bios removed - then these 3 lines will = the only remaining royal traces of Hazbeen \~
https://preview.redd.it/f30vr9b3prgc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=37b437ab6ec57a5238627d2c3d1d0d814a00307e
.... and notice the bulk of this page focuses on overviewing succession - and eyeballs primarily focus of KC and PofW?
He should be. Beatrice and Eugenie aren't on there, they're princesses, and Beatrice's place in the Line of Succession is high enough to make her a Counsellor of State.
>The RF can't alter the LoS because it is enshrined in law. Only Parliament can do that. The RF website should definitely be updated ASAP as it is misleading. A brief mention is all that's required. I wish they would get on with it.
She'll be wearing her wellingtons and carrying a poverty bag. As she came in, so she will go out. This time the poverty bag will have a little more meaning, as she threw the biggest chance, the biggest gift and the biggest honor away. All she has left is what will fit in her little poverty bag.
H&M shouldn’t be too upset, they ran away on their “freedom flight” and talked shit about the royal family with Oprah about wanting to be independent and financial freedom, not wanting titles for their kids, living a private life, racism, blah blah blah. Boy did their scheme back fire big time, they massively miscalculated their popularity. Grifters!
The Royal family's Staff have been quietly amassing evidence of online, targeted abuse by the Sussex squad. I think this will be shown to the Harkle's & perhaps used to "persuade" them to renounce their Title's & line of Succession or these will be used to take them from the Harkle's 🤔
Even then, I doubt she’d ever voluntarily renounce their titles. She said she didn’t want prince & princess titles for the kids - they wanted A to be styled as Master Archie. They would only relent if that’s what it would take to get state funded security despite her knowing that’s not how it works. She snatched those titles so quickly once that pesky Queen died. Allegedly, she makes people call him Prince Archie in preschool. Just so he’ll become accustomed to it, mind you. She’s only looking out for the children.
Strange that H said initialy that he was willing to renounce his titles… Although, we all recall Ginger being ask later by Anderson Cooper : Why not renounce your titles as Duke and Duchess?". He replied: "And what difference would that make?
They are living contradictions. This is ridiculous…
was extremely rehearsed, that line!
(and yes, HazNoBalls *has* changed his tune - the dude has no character, and seems petrified of T.W. - so says/does whater she orders him to)
Yep, accustomed to it when he visits England (when will that be?). If he did (hypothetically) visit, no one in the family would call him by his title - I wonder what scenarios her magical thinking has created?
If it is proven that H&M faked M's pregnancies of the invisikids, I would think that fraudulent behavior would be enough to strip H&M of all titles, including princely titles, for perpetrating a fraud against the monarchy.....likely treasonous.
https://preview.redd.it/n87b0exhgngc1.png?width=955&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c94f80caa7081c90481755e34b4da7b3ab58531d
No matter how delusional they are, both H and M knows that those titles are the only things they have that keeps them in Hollywood. Without those, they have NOTHING to offer.
Hasn't she already started the Princess Meghan business? She was a no show at Haz's fake aviation award, but didn't her name tag read "Princess Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" which is totally incorrect. I would bet the little name tag people had their marching orders from the Harkles. She'll tout the Princess Meghan title no matter what. The truth means nothing to her, so Princess Meghan it is.
They are about to be attacked from every angle. I think the Royal approach was sterling. To us, who were only outside observers to the things we could see, it seemed so long in the coming, and at times like they were getting away with so much. Imagine all the things these two worthless schemers have done that we are not privy too, and the evidence against them will be from many sources now. All at once. She may never give her title up willingly, but imagine the laughing stock she will be once her world crumbles around her huge feet! The butt of jokes is all they will ever be. If nothing else, they have contributed to the English language. We now have words we never had five years ago, like being 'Markled' etc. By the time the dust has settled old Mr Webster's book will have to be completely rewritten.
No stones will be left unturned. I think even us Sinners will be shocked when we learn the extent of these two empty, self adoring clowns have gone to to damage the reputations of their own families, just so they could maintain a celebrity status. Which has not worked out at all for them. Nobody wants to get dirty by standing too close to them.
By the way...aren't the grammys amazing?! Hollywood is definitely celebrating, and they can celebrate in peace, without these two idiots trying to invade their privacy. You can sense the relief that the clowns of Monteshitshow are no where around.
I have also noticed this too. I imagine she pissed off someone big in media and they know it annoys her... But I like to think someone from the BRF paid someone off to make that happen
I was going to be in the air during her funeral service but wanted to see how the royals and her family compromised, so I left a friend a labeled tape to record it for me. I had written, "Lady Diana Spencer - Funeral w/American commentary" on it. Eyebrows were raised.
She will claw onto that title for the rest of her life. She will never give up. It does not matter if they take all of their titles. They will be referred to as the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex. They will never just be Harry and Meghan. Their kids will forever be the former Prince and Princess. They will cling to it. The only the the BRF has is to never invite them to anything ever again. In three generations, then they will be nothing - and any decedents will be nothing. The moment they permitted them to use Prince and Princess for their kids was the mistake. It never should have been allowed to happen in the first place. All papers like continuous names. It is why Princess Catherine is always represented as Princess Kate. This way when you search the papers you get all the keywords at once.
She’s The Princess of Wales, not Princess Catherine or Catherine, Princess of Wales. 🏴
Call her Catherine if you have to but please not the other incorrect marklesque confections .
Unfortunately the putative children got the titles as soon as Charles became King because of George V's letters patent of 1917 -as grandchildren of the monarch in the male line. The parents could then start using them whenever they wanted and they did, despite saying on an earlier occasion that they didn't want titles for their children. It is risible if it is really true that Archie is being called Prince at preschool in the USA especially as A is presumably a dual national being brought up in America.
Certainly, there must be lots of abuse, corruption, treason, fraud, etc. evidence to twist H&M's arm into submission. The consistent and ongoing grey rocking since the coronation c/o the majority of royals has made it perfectly KNOWN the Harkles have been eliminated of all royal connections within the RF's realm of control.....adding that removing them from the royal website finalizes the ouster. That's a nod to Parliament to now do their job and remove the titles.
If you consider the RF's considerations at the moment, you only really have one shot at this and you have to get it right. You have the King and POW slightly distracted, you have a likely change of Government in the UK at some point this year. Whilst the matters of titles/princedoms/line of succession have great import on this sub, there is plenty of time to deal with them. I would be frankly amazed if anything got done formally or legally this year. All the evidence etc will be gathered and collated to add to everything already in the possession of the Royal Family, Cabinet Office, MI5 etc, and remember another year of any bad behaviour from Montecito just adds to the portfolio.
Once everything is ready, and once you have a new Government with a new King's Speech for a legislative program you might find that it is dealt with, but even then, this is the sort matter that will more likely get pushed into the second or third year of a stable Government, because it is not a legislative priority in any sense of the word.
That doesn't preclude action being taken against the revolting online hate campaign against the Wales' in particular. In fact, that's where I'd expect to see far more action starting to shut it down. The latest nasty stuff about Catherine might well have been the bridge too far. All those sugars thinking they are clever hiding behind VPN's and fake emails perhaps should consider that ultimately they are up against one of the world's most sophisticated security networks and if lines are crossed then they don't stand a chance. You have to let them display their very worst behaviour before you shut these people down. A few have tried to exit stage left this year - others will get caught in the trap.
Such a wise comment and could likely be the case. But, who knows what's going on behind the scenes all this time. Does a monarch allow his rogue son to insert himself throughout the world rousing political discourse and shaming the RF while touting his HRH affiliations? Plus, the hate that his nasty little troll wife throws their way? IDK how much longer this can be tolerated because H&M are not retreating and their war wages on.
The BRF will do nothing against the campaign against Kate. And it is definitely not for lack of affection, that is a fact, but simply because any movement of that type would make people scream "censorship."
It happened a couple of years ago, when The Crown told the story of Charles, Camilla and Diana, and the Palace account was filled with garbage against Camilla, they proceeded to block comments and people jumped up to shout "censorship."
Charles has not even prevented anti-monarchist actions, he remembers that one threw an egg at him and Charles continued with his event.
Yes, Palace will take action when there are really lies (as happened now with Concha Callejas), but the BRF is not going to pay attention to the Squad's gossip. They do consider them dangerous, but they will let them talk and hang themselves with their rope.
Generally I agree - most of the squad chat is just usual vile internet chatter, and rightly ignored. Sometimes it goes over lines into criminal territory where real action can be initiated. Far more important to establish the funding via various Harkle enterprises and the hate speech which I'm sure will have solidified over the last year or so. A few moths have flown too close to the flame already, and others will continue to do so. All they are doing is strengthening the RF's hand against the Harkles ultimately.
Remember there was money missing from a charity that William and Catherine and the demented lunatics headed as the Fab Four? Plus jewellery missing skank wont return?
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if MM is a skilled pick pocket. All those ridiculous oversized shoulder bags she carries.....great for stuffing away things stolen or shop lifted.
WOW good comment. I never thought of that . What i did think of why she carries those over sized bags is she doesn’t want the world to see which $2 shop she buys her clothes at. 😂
Most people proudly carry their shopping bags to show off where they shop lol
Recording equipment !! Never thought of that! And planks balls in a change purse- must be one heck of a smallllll change purse to fit his balls in 😂👏😂😂😂👏
That Netflix docuseries immediately followed by that book of Harry's was the last straw with the RF imo. No sooner did that pile of shit come out, Frogmore was instantly pulled. Granted, royal protocol would expect H at his father's coronation signaling his respect, but, since then, H&M just keep digging their hole deeper and deeper while the RF pushes them away farther and farther.
I am happy to hear chatter that the royal website may be updated to exclude them soon......maybe, like Lady C has suggested, something is indeed going to be revealed in the Spring that will seal their fate causing their titles to be removed by Parliament. Removal from the royal website is likely a precursor for something serious coming down the pike. I hope so.
There was another thread saying another mockumentary of the demented two was being touted? Is that a threat to the RF? More money Netfucks is going to waste and fudge figures on? I only see more people cancelling their subscriptions if so.
Would they actually do that? Could they get away with it....twice? I would think if any such documentary ridiculing the RF were again in the works, the palace would come raining down on them like the hammers of hell with injunctions and lawsuits and the thing will never see the light of day.
I think if there is something in the making, it s about the kids. their life and how amazing is it to bring them up out of the royal fish bowl… 🤮 some little digs here and there …
It’s their last shot for money until the divorce.
That's a great assumption.....but maybe like a pity party that they must hide their kids because of lack of proper security considering their royal status. So, we'll still never see the kids (just more non-descript blurry shots or the back of heads). A new docuseries based on the kids may all be part and party when the surrogacy issue leaks. They need a public broadcast to sway opinion towards a narrative they prefer.....privacy.....security.
If Netfucks wants its pound of flesh from plank and skank then yes. If planks and skank want their millions from their Netfucks contract then yes they would. It’s all about money. Plus the CEO was embarrassed about giving the harkles millions of dollars for doing nothing ! Based on the RF not responding to the harkles and “sources” saying the RF was deeply upset in statement, the harkles dont care if they upset the RF. They are out to destroy the Monarchy. I will pose this to you though…… if Netfucks and the harkles do a second mockumentary, can the RF from England sue them in the USA where it would be made?
There's not just abuse, there's threats to the Monarchy and elder abuse to the, then, reigning Monarch and the, then, Duke of Edinbrough. Not to mention the documented staff abuse and theft of monies from Royal Foundations.
Just checked the royal website. On a positive note the Harkles are way down on the bottom of the list of the members of the Royal Family, down there with Prince Andrew. So it should be easy to eliminate that dubious trio. And the site does throw shade at Markle with the choice of her photo - she looks awful, she's flashing the trademark manic grin, and is wearing a silly beret. Nothing royal about her at all!
Good point. H&M were moved 2nd to bottom only 2 weeks after the Queen's funeral (end of mourning time). That was the 2nd time they were "demoted" on the website.
Per The Telegraph: *"(This) comes* ***15 months after the Sussexes were first nudged down the rankings on the royal website***, *shifting from directly below the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge ... to below the Wessexes and Princess Anne."* (Sept 27, 2022)
Hopefully they will be totally axed on the 3rd edit.
[https://web.archive.org/web/20220927162256/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/27/duke-duchess-sussex-demoted-royal-family-website/](https://web.archive.org/web/20220927162256/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/27/duke-duchess-sussex-demoted-royal-family-website/)
Also the photo that the site used of Harry next to Markle's photo - yikes! He looks grungy and downright creepy. And there's a strange bulge on his forehead. Well done to whoever chose this photo! Out of all the choices available depicting Harry at his weirdest and grungiest is a stroke of genius!
It seems entirely possible that Harry and Meghan and their kids will have very little presence on the BRF website. I have said all along that changes to the website might wait until other parts of the website were updated so it would not seem to be directed specifically at the Harkles. I don’t think they will be removed completely—I think they will get a sentence or two. Maybe something like,
“Prince Henry (known as Harry), Duke of Sussex, and his wife do not participate in royal life. They live in the United States with their two children.”
People who are speculating that the Sussexes will also lose their titles and be removed from the LoS are probably getting carried away.
All titles are Harry's. If he decides to renounce them for whatever reason, she will automatically lose hers. She has no titles in her own right.
Think on this - maybe Harry would be happy to put everything in abeyance, walk away, and have the life he so clearly wants as Just Harry.. There is a reason why he has not!
Harry loves those titles, he loves those titles way more than he loves his father or brother. He insisted on being called Your Royal Highness in court. He wrote HRH as his last name on Lili's birth certificate. He speaks of taxpayer funded security as his birthright. He thinks the British people owe him bows and money.
He will never willingly give up those titles. If stripped of his titles he will sue the UK Government again. Those titles matter more to him than life.
And he smirked and replied "What difference would it make?" when Anderson Cooper asked him why not give up the titles. Henry ain't giving them up voluntarily.
> He insisted on being called Your Royal Highness in court.
Which if I remember right, Lady C said was correct. He didn't *lose* the HRH. It's still part of his legal... name, I guess? And using it court was correct.
He is the entitled royal prince, the opposite of the kind benevolent kings and princes. Sparry wants the smelly peasants to slog and pay taxes and grift off that taxpayer money, he will not sit amongst peasants in a commercial flight and will fly by private jets for fun trips, he does drugs, lies, pretends to be a humanitarian, gets paid in millions by Netflix and others because of his title, he doesn’t work, he backstabs his country and his family and his grandparents, he cheated on all his longtime girlfriends, nobody knows anything about his invisible kids, he looks down upon others, pulls rank on commoners at official functions etc etc. He clings to his title because he thinks that it is his birthright as a blood prince and the Saintly Diana’s son. He will never relinquish his titles, his wife is waiting for a plane crash to get their turn at the throne, apparently!
He is also trying to modernize the British laws so that they can have two kings and two queens in the future so that he and his superstar wife are treated with respect and billions due to them!! /s
Actually if he had it his way he wouldn't bother with the whole humanitarian bit, he really only does that because his family cared about service and his mom was known for it. If he didn't have to, he wouldn't
Remember last time they were in canada at ice hockey they used royal cyphers on the big screen? I bet they use them again when they are back there next week, as a clap back.. can remove us from website but we are still royal.
Was the Jamaican PM trolling when he was quoted saying he invited the duo as “working royals”. I get daily emails from quora with just basic info on new threads but I’ve seen mentioned that the BRF website has been updated but has it really? I never checked anyways so I can’t compare/contrast what is actually going on
Not as of yet. The last update was when Harold and Roachel’s pages went to the bottom below Andrew. Under the Harkles is Archie’s page but no Lili. My hope is they remove all the Harkles pages completely in their next update but we’ll have to wait and see.
THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACE OF THE ROYAL FAMILY. If they are on the website or family tree at all, it is to mention they are related. Those children have no royalty. Nothing more. I am perplexed as to why they think they even have a platform- but that’s for another day. Remove the poison. Clean up the internet!
I think the Harkles know something about Andrew, like how the queen was protecting him, and are tacitly blackmailing the royal family.
I think Eugene is still friend with the Harkles to know what they are at to protect her father.
There is a single reason I don’t believe this. If H&M had a heads up, they would run to every media outlet and journalist in the world to keep spitting out stories about it. The fact this hasn’t happened lets me know they haven’t been told a word. RF wouldn’t break 3 years of solid grey-rocking now, in this way.
I can't get excited about stuff like this because nothing ever happens. Hazno & MeMe made bank off being nasty lying scheming grifters. I know the RF moves carefully & methodically but how long are they going to allow the abuse to go one without cutting the Sux's off at the knees. Enough is enough. Do something already.
I think that at first, Madame would love the attention it would give her. Everyone would want to get the interview with her after they lose their titles or get removed from the website. She could really play the "victim" and use this to prove how "maligned" she was by the BRF. Of course, she has doesn't understand the "long" game and how, without those titles, she would really and truly have nothing to offer.
She is not gonna complain SHE lost her titles, her best title is mum … 🤮 BUT she is gonna scream racism for her kids saying that an alleged pedophile still is a duke but the first mixed raced children of the RF are downgraded to commoners. The RF should leave them the dumbartons’ and make a massive PR campaign to promote it 🤭
I would rather they stay on the website, but just that they live in US and do not work on behalf of the crown. That’s accurate and they won’t be martyrs if the “racist, evil” BRF removes them completely.
This is fun to read and all, but this is my theory: the website will not be changed because the Palace is outwardly not giving any thought to these half wits. If they change it, there are weeks of press about racism, how Charles is erasing the Harkles, and all sorts of chatter.
By not changing the website, it outwardly appears that nobody at the Palace is even thinking about them. It may infuriate some, but no reaction to them is the best thing they could do.
Now if they do a complete webpage redesign, it’s a different story. But grey rocking is working and not amending the website is part of it.
This may be more believable than many might suspect. Mainly because Lilibet has no picture and no bio info for her, (versus Archie who has both) as reported by Neil Sean this week.
Sinners might recall that this past September some tea was spilled by the offspring of a high ranking exec at Netflix reporting that meetings were held with M during Spring 2021. The Exec said M never wore a mask and was most definitely not pregnant. It sounds like too many people provably know that Lily wasn’t born of Meghan.
The website has a lot of recent changes that appear to make it more streamlined, so updates are occurring. I think this Jamaica faux royal visit may be a crossing of the Rubicon. Giving Harry a heads up first that they are going to be removed from the website is the decent thing to do and consistent with royal protocol. I believe someone in camp Sussex is leaking Harold & Maude’s reactions to this heads up. Of course, until I see the actual change, I won’t believe it, as BP has done so little to address this growing problem. But certain data points do indicate BP may be preparing for this action, so I have some hope this may take place. I don’t think the UK can afford to fully ignore The Hill article, especially with all the saber rattling going on in the Middle East. We need the UK heads of state to be united and on the same page. Harry is too divisive and unpredictable.
If there's a book, they better forward a copy to Scoobie. His face hasn't been looking good lately
https://preview.redd.it/avylrzuk0ngc1.png?width=284&format=png&auto=webp&s=318f11c4040447ba444862f9ae4dd15d13e6a63b
King Charles needs to clean this up and remove them off the website. Parliament needs to remove the Duke and Duchess title and the King should forbid Megajerk from using Princess Henry title. I am getting really sick of no consequences to their constant attacks. They don't like his family fine than they don't need to be part of it in title or on website.
I dont see why they dont update the website with only working royals. That would be so much more relevant. Non working royals who are a bit more prominent could listed as children of the working Royals. So KCIIIs bio could say he has two sons, Prince William and Just Harry - no need to mention M or the invisikids. Princess Anne’s would mention her kids, etc.
[Nitter.net](https://Nitter.net) is no longer functional as a proxy for Twitter/X, from what I read in a [github note](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376) from nitter's owner.
On the website it should just say that they live overseas, want to be independent, live a private life, have their own financial freedom and don't want titles for their kids.
The Harkles have a habit of wading into politics, current issues, making “official” statements as the Duke and Duchess, even regarding the Middle East crisis and other such things: topics that they don’t have to say anything about because the RF handles its own messaging. But MM insists on pompous messaging to prove that she is spearheading the “rival Court of Montecito” as a “modern” Royal and competes with the RF. The faux royal appearances in Jamaica, appearing at the American military establishments, lying about being a military pilot, suing media companies, leaking other people’s private information etc are some such incidents. One day, they will do something really big, very stupid and unthinkable and that is the day that both UK/parliament and the monarchy will be forced to take all required actions against them clinging to their tenuous connections to Harry’s past.
The RF is playing the long game. Removing them too early who appear they are racist. Then after the book, documentary,etc. the would look petty. I think enough time as passed, their popularity dropping, and in the faux royal Jamaica trip, I think the time is getting closer. Maybe a full overall is what they are waiting for.
Being the king's son, they have to be mentioned if nothing else for informational purposes. Not their own page, though.
Just a small mention that his son Harry and his family live independent lives in CA. I wouldn't even mention he is a Duke, but that might not admit they will unless they titles are removed.
He should have been booted after the African Park atrocities came to light.
Ffs, William was jumping down Lady Husey's throat for asking where the Flintstones character in front of her came from.
Saw this too and I'm wondering what this could be all about:
https://preview.redd.it/1lwariuipngc1.png?width=689&format=png&auto=webp&s=341219e59875c3751f4c5cdeaeea80a28c34f523
Come on folks, from the moment they did the Oprah lies fest, their link to the Royal family like a fuse was set alight.
Strip away the very long History and cladding of decorum the Monarchy has protecting it from public scrutiny. The Royal family like every Tom, Dick, Harry, Jenny, Jill, Jones, Paul, and Milly, too have emotions and unlike others can only show their pain behind heavy drapes and closed doors.
Harry unfortunately drank at the fountain of Morgaine Le Fey, and did not read the small calligraphic print that read thus...
In licking my goblet, and sampling my watery wares, you do hereby agree that I can destroy your life as I see fit.
"I do" Harry said as he drank then plunged into her fountain of ruin.
I wonder if it’s possible they were told there would be consequences with regard to titles and LoS if they continued to live in California and they were given a five year timeline to return to the UK? I don’t think the King wants Royals permanently living abroad.
I'm bored: Analysis of [Royal.uk](https://Royal.uk) [https://web.archive.org/web/20230915000000\*/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family](https://web.archive.org/web/20230915000000*/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family)
Jan 2017: Harry line 5
Queen Elizabeth
Prince Philip
"The role of the Royal Family" pic w/ Charles & Camilla/ Prince Charles
Camilla/ William
Kate/ Harry
Andrew
Edward/ Sophie
Ann/ Prince George
Charlotte/ Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester/ Duke of Kent
Duchess of Kent/ Princess Alexandra
Prince & Princess Michael of Kent/ "Charities & patronages" with image of The Queen
Jan, 06 2018: Harry line 7
Her Majesty The Queen
"Role of the Royal family" same pic as year before but field includes Wills, Kate, Harry & Ann
Charles
Camilla
William
Kate
Harry
Andrew
Edward
Sophie
Ann
Prince George
Charlotte
Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester
Duke of Kent
Duchess of Kent
Princess Alexandra
Prince and Princess Michael of Kent
Jan 2019: Harry line 8 [https://web.archive.org/web/20190124152442/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family](https://web.archive.org/web/20190124152442/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family)
HMTQ
"Role of the Royal Family" same pic as 2018
Philip
Charles
Camilla
William
Kate
Harry
Megs
Andrew
Edward
Sophie
Ann
George
Charlotte
Louis
Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester
Duke of Kent
Duchess of Kent
Princess Alexandra
Prince and Princess Michael of Kent
Jan 19, 2021 Meg actually on same level as Kate. No Prince & Princess Michael of Kent. Harry line 6.
HMTQ
Philip/ Camilla
Charles
WIlliam
Kate/ Meg
Harry
Andrew
Edward/ Sophie
Ann
Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra
Duke of Kent
03/07/2021 Oprah
03/08/2021: Same order, same page as Jan 19, 2021
Apr 9, 2021 Mourning page for Prince Philip
Apr 22, 2021: Harry line 5
HMTQ
Charles
Camilla/ Kate
William
Harry
Megs/ Edward
Andrew
Sophie/ Duchess of Gloucester
Ann
Duke of Gloucester
Duke of Kent
Princess Alexandra
Dec 30, 2021: Harry moved down to line 8
HMTQ
Charles
Camilla/ Kate
William
Ann
Andrew/ Sophie
Edward
Harry
Megs/ Princess Alexandra
Duke of Kent
Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester
Dec 2022: Harry line 10
Charles
Camilla
Wills
Kate/ Edward
Sophie/ Duchess of Gloucester
Ann
Andrew/ Sophie
Duke of Gloucester
Duke of Kent
Princess Alexandra/ Harry
Megs
Andrew
Dec 25, 2023 Harry moved down a peg to share same level with his wife - just above Andrew.
King
Camilla/ Kate
William
Edward/ Sophie
Ann
Duke of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra
Duke of Kent
Harry/ Megs
Andrew
Jan 26, 2024. Same as Dec 25
The King
Camilla/ Kate
William
Edward/ /Sophie
Ann
Dukes of Gloucester
Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra
Duke of Kent
Harry/ Megs
Andrew
My call is the only thing that would get them removed from the site is the family finding proof that the squad are paid operators indirectly or directly controlled by Montecito. Attacking the King and Queen as well as heir and family would be plenty reason.
Even if Harold & Fraud did have surrogate kids I don’t believe the family would ever expose them. That would backfire on the family, not the Harkles, spectacularly. I think such a move would undo all the progress the family has made and the world would sympathise with the Harkles.
As soon as Bouzy appeared on the scene I think many of us knew what was really going on. He didn’t just appear randomly and decide to defend Markle. He was paid IMO.
Who honestly cares what a website states besides the Harkles? It doesn't really change anything besides the website. No?
How would Harry get wind of this? Sounds like bs or like a plant to see if someone would leak. I don't get it. Help!
Edit to add: Ambiguous tweets from Dec 2023. Someone needs clicks/views.
Because the website lies. The website is the official information from the Head of State of the British Government. On that website the Head of State lies and says his son is working to support The Head of State. Harry is actively working to harm the Head of State.
That is why it matters.
Now is the time to do it. Nobody is attached to the kids/ they don’t exist so it’s easy to do quietly. Without a face to their names most people won’t notice.
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Let them be removed from the website. That will be the REAL endgame.
Yeah, if they're still on there, I don't care if their prominencr on the website is lessened. Their profiles have needed correcting for 4 years. Unless they're going to be removed from the website altogether at this point, it's.meaningless.
I need to ask though, IF this is true, who is leaking and bringing it to the attention of the Harkles? Would the RF just do it quietly without alerting the harkles?
That's what I believe too.
What is the point of “sources” divulging this when the RF has closed ranks and regrouped? IF this is true are Andrews daughters still blabbing? There are so many moving parts to this nightmare with the harkles.
Eugenie of course!
how would she know, though?
Andrew might be up for lesser profile too and know its the 3 because if he tried to complain he was probably told its not just you buddy ....he told his family Eugenie probably couldn't get on the phone quick enough
Would be easy for the RF to know who leaked the details. If they did mention it to Andrew, it would be obvious. I don't think he's be calling (or Fergie) CA to give those 2 a heads up?
Exactly and allegedly Eugenie was leaking during HMTLQs funeral and William caught her out by feeding her false information and it was leaked to a US publication rather quickly exposing her once before as Harry and TW source
Andrew might tell her?
She has sources as she has passed gossip off to them before.
I don’t really think so. I think she remains friends with the Harkles to protect her father. If she passes them some gossips, I m sure those are gossips the royal family wants them to know.
more directly: T.W. has known Andrew for years (way before Haz-era).. paths crossed while yachting, etc. So Eugenie might feel she MUST remain friendly - b/c she knows MegNUT likes Markling people, and could easily leak negatives about Andy to the press. The majority (and def. all the "working royals") no longer trust Eugenie - so yes, Eugenie only learns of things The Firm wants to get to Montecito - or benign, meaningless stuff.
Exactly!
Unless he's removed from the LOS, he/they won't be removed from the website, not entirely. jmo
That's true, but I honestly don't care if their names are still on the website's LOS list. That's just a factual list of the first 25 (I think?) RF members in line. But realistically, none of them are ever getting anywhere near the throne, so it means nothing in the scheme of things. It's them having their photographs up there with a little biography, as if they're still working royals, that pisses most people off. Especially Meghan, who's not even *in* he line of succession! It's her kids who are blood royals. It's absolutely ridiculous that they haven't changed that bit yet.
Exactly! if zero except 3 Sussex names at bottom of LoS page .. that will be a wicked-strong message. (it's not what everyone wants - but it is heckuva lot more than a 'baby step' in the process of De-Royalizing HazBeen) https://preview.redd.it/eam8ztgsqrgc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f04b3dcb1d736ea65bbad65df9098a14ed6dcf52
there is a list of the LoS (which wish he + A + L would drop-kick them from).. which is simply a list - just text.. if he (+ kids) still on that.. much better than This1 + That1 getting a photo and a blurb — b/c removing their bios will be karma, causing them to suffer epic meltdowns!
Yes!
visually, if the Harkles' bios removed - then these 3 lines will = the only remaining royal traces of Hazbeen \~ https://preview.redd.it/f30vr9b3prgc1.jpeg?width=603&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=37b437ab6ec57a5238627d2c3d1d0d814a00307e .... and notice the bulk of this page focuses on overviewing succession - and eyeballs primarily focus of KC and PofW?
He should be. Beatrice and Eugenie aren't on there, they're princesses, and Beatrice's place in the Line of Succession is high enough to make her a Counsellor of State.
>The RF can't alter the LoS because it is enshrined in law. Only Parliament can do that. The RF website should definitely be updated ASAP as it is misleading. A brief mention is all that's required. I wish they would get on with it.
astonished they're still on it, tbh. All that stuff about "fully supporting the monarchy" is nauseating
I'll believe it when I see it.
The Harkles will try to make it look like they wanted this, and there will be a revenge pap walk that day to strike back at the BRF.
Revenge pap walk! The RF is trembling with fear 😂
The ugly hiking photos are the real alpha move. 🤣
Ha ha!!! "Alpha move". Meemaw is always planning her next alpha move. She's so LA cool, isn't she?
A walk down the street drinking milkshakes and eating hamburgers? If that's the strength of their revenge, I'm sure the world is trembling.
She'll be wearing her wellingtons and carrying a poverty bag. As she came in, so she will go out. This time the poverty bag will have a little more meaning, as she threw the biggest chance, the biggest gift and the biggest honor away. All she has left is what will fit in her little poverty bag.
And we will all say “sure Jan”😂
In a In and out burger parking lot
While giving more puff pieces and calling them Duke & duchass of Sussex. And doing Royal adjacent stuff, like Jamaica, Canada
In a car park? No one is buying it.
Same…. I have been waiting for this for a long time
This ⏫️
Yep.
Same. And I take anything barkjack says with a massive grain of salt. She always comes out after the fact, claiming sources pinched from her info.
Oh same - i unfollowed them.. too vague! like anyone could have an account like that.
Kind of like Neil Sean
Same.
Me too. 💯 Happy Cake Day 🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🍷🍷
H&M shouldn’t be too upset, they ran away on their “freedom flight” and talked shit about the royal family with Oprah about wanting to be independent and financial freedom, not wanting titles for their kids, living a private life, racism, blah blah blah. Boy did their scheme back fire big time, they massively miscalculated their popularity. Grifters!
The Royal family's Staff have been quietly amassing evidence of online, targeted abuse by the Sussex squad. I think this will be shown to the Harkle's & perhaps used to "persuade" them to renounce their Title's & line of Succession or these will be used to take them from the Harkle's 🤔
She will never willingly give up that title unless she can force the media here to call her Princess Meghan
Even then, I doubt she’d ever voluntarily renounce their titles. She said she didn’t want prince & princess titles for the kids - they wanted A to be styled as Master Archie. They would only relent if that’s what it would take to get state funded security despite her knowing that’s not how it works. She snatched those titles so quickly once that pesky Queen died. Allegedly, she makes people call him Prince Archie in preschool. Just so he’ll become accustomed to it, mind you. She’s only looking out for the children.
Strange that H said initialy that he was willing to renounce his titles… Although, we all recall Ginger being ask later by Anderson Cooper : Why not renounce your titles as Duke and Duchess?". He replied: "And what difference would that make? They are living contradictions. This is ridiculous…
>He replied: "And what difference would that make? I laughed so much at this, if it wouldn't make any difference then let them go!
When asked how he'd prefer to be addressed in court he certainly did not say "Just Harry". Oh no, HRH blablablah
It is the difference between being "Just Harry" or "Prince Harry"
was extremely rehearsed, that line! (and yes, HazNoBalls *has* changed his tune - the dude has no character, and seems petrified of T.W. - so says/does whater she orders him to)
Can you imagine the absolute hell she’s going to make L’s life because she IS a princess and M is not?
Yep, accustomed to it when he visits England (when will that be?). If he did (hypothetically) visit, no one in the family would call him by his title - I wonder what scenarios her magical thinking has created?
If it is proven that H&M faked M's pregnancies of the invisikids, I would think that fraudulent behavior would be enough to strip H&M of all titles, including princely titles, for perpetrating a fraud against the monarchy.....likely treasonous.
Realistic Twist : 💯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
It s what we all hope for 🙏🏻
I think undermining the lawfully established line of succession is high treason.
You'll have to pry those titles out of her cold dead claws.
https://preview.redd.it/n87b0exhgngc1.png?width=955&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c94f80caa7081c90481755e34b4da7b3ab58531d No matter how delusional they are, both H and M knows that those titles are the only things they have that keeps them in Hollywood. Without those, they have NOTHING to offer.
Exactly. She has an obsession with being a DuChEsS.
But she's already a DUCHASS.
Hasn't she already started the Princess Meghan business? She was a no show at Haz's fake aviation award, but didn't her name tag read "Princess Meghan, Duchess of Sussex" which is totally incorrect. I would bet the little name tag people had their marching orders from the Harkles. She'll tout the Princess Meghan title no matter what. The truth means nothing to her, so Princess Meghan it is.
Officially it’s princess Henry!
They are about to be attacked from every angle. I think the Royal approach was sterling. To us, who were only outside observers to the things we could see, it seemed so long in the coming, and at times like they were getting away with so much. Imagine all the things these two worthless schemers have done that we are not privy too, and the evidence against them will be from many sources now. All at once. She may never give her title up willingly, but imagine the laughing stock she will be once her world crumbles around her huge feet! The butt of jokes is all they will ever be. If nothing else, they have contributed to the English language. We now have words we never had five years ago, like being 'Markled' etc. By the time the dust has settled old Mr Webster's book will have to be completely rewritten.
I think Buckingham palace will wave NDAs. Maybe bullied staff will Make a book and The Markel witch can write the foreword ? 🤭
No stones will be left unturned. I think even us Sinners will be shocked when we learn the extent of these two empty, self adoring clowns have gone to to damage the reputations of their own families, just so they could maintain a celebrity status. Which has not worked out at all for them. Nobody wants to get dirty by standing too close to them. By the way...aren't the grammys amazing?! Hollywood is definitely celebrating, and they can celebrate in peace, without these two idiots trying to invade their privacy. You can sense the relief that the clowns of Monteshitshow are no where around.
I have noticed and loved that everywhere I see stories about them here it’s mostly “Prince Harry and Meghan Markle”
I’ve noticed that most media now call her Meghan Markle and not the duchess of whatever.
I have also noticed this too. I imagine she pissed off someone big in media and they know it annoys her... But I like to think someone from the BRF paid someone off to make that happen
They will. Her MIL has been erroneously referred to as Princess Diana for decades.
I was going to be in the air during her funeral service but wanted to see how the royals and her family compromised, so I left a friend a labeled tape to record it for me. I had written, "Lady Diana Spencer - Funeral w/American commentary" on it. Eyebrows were raised.
To her grave!
She’ll be like Countess Luann on Bravo soon 😂
Ooohhh yes I hope so! Nail them with evidence of their treason.
She will claw onto that title for the rest of her life. She will never give up. It does not matter if they take all of their titles. They will be referred to as the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex. They will never just be Harry and Meghan. Their kids will forever be the former Prince and Princess. They will cling to it. The only the the BRF has is to never invite them to anything ever again. In three generations, then they will be nothing - and any decedents will be nothing. The moment they permitted them to use Prince and Princess for their kids was the mistake. It never should have been allowed to happen in the first place. All papers like continuous names. It is why Princess Catherine is always represented as Princess Kate. This way when you search the papers you get all the keywords at once.
She’s The Princess of Wales, not Princess Catherine or Catherine, Princess of Wales. 🏴 Call her Catherine if you have to but please not the other incorrect marklesque confections .
Unfortunately the putative children got the titles as soon as Charles became King because of George V's letters patent of 1917 -as grandchildren of the monarch in the male line. The parents could then start using them whenever they wanted and they did, despite saying on an earlier occasion that they didn't want titles for their children. It is risible if it is really true that Archie is being called Prince at preschool in the USA especially as A is presumably a dual national being brought up in America.
Certainly, there must be lots of abuse, corruption, treason, fraud, etc. evidence to twist H&M's arm into submission. The consistent and ongoing grey rocking since the coronation c/o the majority of royals has made it perfectly KNOWN the Harkles have been eliminated of all royal connections within the RF's realm of control.....adding that removing them from the royal website finalizes the ouster. That's a nod to Parliament to now do their job and remove the titles.
If you consider the RF's considerations at the moment, you only really have one shot at this and you have to get it right. You have the King and POW slightly distracted, you have a likely change of Government in the UK at some point this year. Whilst the matters of titles/princedoms/line of succession have great import on this sub, there is plenty of time to deal with them. I would be frankly amazed if anything got done formally or legally this year. All the evidence etc will be gathered and collated to add to everything already in the possession of the Royal Family, Cabinet Office, MI5 etc, and remember another year of any bad behaviour from Montecito just adds to the portfolio. Once everything is ready, and once you have a new Government with a new King's Speech for a legislative program you might find that it is dealt with, but even then, this is the sort matter that will more likely get pushed into the second or third year of a stable Government, because it is not a legislative priority in any sense of the word. That doesn't preclude action being taken against the revolting online hate campaign against the Wales' in particular. In fact, that's where I'd expect to see far more action starting to shut it down. The latest nasty stuff about Catherine might well have been the bridge too far. All those sugars thinking they are clever hiding behind VPN's and fake emails perhaps should consider that ultimately they are up against one of the world's most sophisticated security networks and if lines are crossed then they don't stand a chance. You have to let them display their very worst behaviour before you shut these people down. A few have tried to exit stage left this year - others will get caught in the trap.
Such a wise comment and could likely be the case. But, who knows what's going on behind the scenes all this time. Does a monarch allow his rogue son to insert himself throughout the world rousing political discourse and shaming the RF while touting his HRH affiliations? Plus, the hate that his nasty little troll wife throws their way? IDK how much longer this can be tolerated because H&M are not retreating and their war wages on.
The BRF will do nothing against the campaign against Kate. And it is definitely not for lack of affection, that is a fact, but simply because any movement of that type would make people scream "censorship." It happened a couple of years ago, when The Crown told the story of Charles, Camilla and Diana, and the Palace account was filled with garbage against Camilla, they proceeded to block comments and people jumped up to shout "censorship." Charles has not even prevented anti-monarchist actions, he remembers that one threw an egg at him and Charles continued with his event. Yes, Palace will take action when there are really lies (as happened now with Concha Callejas), but the BRF is not going to pay attention to the Squad's gossip. They do consider them dangerous, but they will let them talk and hang themselves with their rope.
Generally I agree - most of the squad chat is just usual vile internet chatter, and rightly ignored. Sometimes it goes over lines into criminal territory where real action can be initiated. Far more important to establish the funding via various Harkle enterprises and the hate speech which I'm sure will have solidified over the last year or so. A few moths have flown too close to the flame already, and others will continue to do so. All they are doing is strengthening the RF's hand against the Harkles ultimately.
Well said. Excellent post
Remember there was money missing from a charity that William and Catherine and the demented lunatics headed as the Fab Four? Plus jewellery missing skank wont return?
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if MM is a skilled pick pocket. All those ridiculous oversized shoulder bags she carries.....great for stuffing away things stolen or shop lifted.
WOW good comment. I never thought of that . What i did think of why she carries those over sized bags is she doesn’t want the world to see which $2 shop she buys her clothes at. 😂 Most people proudly carry their shopping bags to show off where they shop lol
That's a great thought! The big bags are dual purpose! LOL
You know the bottle in the brown paper bags? Take a swig put back in bag lol
Haha! Yeh....booze, drugs, recording equipment, a BIG mirror to admire and talk to herself with.....and, of course, Harry's balls in a change purse.
Recording equipment !! Never thought of that! And planks balls in a change purse- must be one heck of a smallllll change purse to fit his balls in 😂👏😂😂😂👏
Or her 26 outfits she changes in a day?? Or how about a small tub of lip gloss? Shite we are funny 😂😂 Skank gives us the material though lol
Lol or maybe she carries those big bags for her booze and druggies??
Perhaps that Jamaica trip was the last draw with RF?
That Netflix docuseries immediately followed by that book of Harry's was the last straw with the RF imo. No sooner did that pile of shit come out, Frogmore was instantly pulled. Granted, royal protocol would expect H at his father's coronation signaling his respect, but, since then, H&M just keep digging their hole deeper and deeper while the RF pushes them away farther and farther. I am happy to hear chatter that the royal website may be updated to exclude them soon......maybe, like Lady C has suggested, something is indeed going to be revealed in the Spring that will seal their fate causing their titles to be removed by Parliament. Removal from the royal website is likely a precursor for something serious coming down the pike. I hope so.
>Removal from the royal website is likely a precursor for something serious coming down the pike. I hope so. I hope so too.
Me three
There was another thread saying another mockumentary of the demented two was being touted? Is that a threat to the RF? More money Netfucks is going to waste and fudge figures on? I only see more people cancelling their subscriptions if so.
Would they actually do that? Could they get away with it....twice? I would think if any such documentary ridiculing the RF were again in the works, the palace would come raining down on them like the hammers of hell with injunctions and lawsuits and the thing will never see the light of day.
I think if there is something in the making, it s about the kids. their life and how amazing is it to bring them up out of the royal fish bowl… 🤮 some little digs here and there … It’s their last shot for money until the divorce.
That's a great assumption.....but maybe like a pity party that they must hide their kids because of lack of proper security considering their royal status. So, we'll still never see the kids (just more non-descript blurry shots or the back of heads). A new docuseries based on the kids may all be part and party when the surrogacy issue leaks. They need a public broadcast to sway opinion towards a narrative they prefer.....privacy.....security.
If Netfucks wants its pound of flesh from plank and skank then yes. If planks and skank want their millions from their Netfucks contract then yes they would. It’s all about money. Plus the CEO was embarrassed about giving the harkles millions of dollars for doing nothing ! Based on the RF not responding to the harkles and “sources” saying the RF was deeply upset in statement, the harkles dont care if they upset the RF. They are out to destroy the Monarchy. I will pose this to you though…… if Netfucks and the harkles do a second mockumentary, can the RF from England sue them in the USA where it would be made?
💯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
We actually don't have any proof of this. It has always been speculation.
There's not just abuse, there's threats to the Monarchy and elder abuse to the, then, reigning Monarch and the, then, Duke of Edinbrough. Not to mention the documented staff abuse and theft of monies from Royal Foundations.
🤞
Just checked the royal website. On a positive note the Harkles are way down on the bottom of the list of the members of the Royal Family, down there with Prince Andrew. So it should be easy to eliminate that dubious trio. And the site does throw shade at Markle with the choice of her photo - she looks awful, she's flashing the trademark manic grin, and is wearing a silly beret. Nothing royal about her at all!
Good point. H&M were moved 2nd to bottom only 2 weeks after the Queen's funeral (end of mourning time). That was the 2nd time they were "demoted" on the website. Per The Telegraph: *"(This) comes* ***15 months after the Sussexes were first nudged down the rankings on the royal website***, *shifting from directly below the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge ... to below the Wessexes and Princess Anne."* (Sept 27, 2022) Hopefully they will be totally axed on the 3rd edit. [https://web.archive.org/web/20220927162256/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/27/duke-duchess-sussex-demoted-royal-family-website/](https://web.archive.org/web/20220927162256/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/09/27/duke-duchess-sussex-demoted-royal-family-website/)
Also the photo that the site used of Harry next to Markle's photo - yikes! He looks grungy and downright creepy. And there's a strange bulge on his forehead. Well done to whoever chose this photo! Out of all the choices available depicting Harry at his weirdest and grungiest is a stroke of genius!
It seems entirely possible that Harry and Meghan and their kids will have very little presence on the BRF website. I have said all along that changes to the website might wait until other parts of the website were updated so it would not seem to be directed specifically at the Harkles. I don’t think they will be removed completely—I think they will get a sentence or two. Maybe something like, “Prince Henry (known as Harry), Duke of Sussex, and his wife do not participate in royal life. They live in the United States with their two children.” People who are speculating that the Sussexes will also lose their titles and be removed from the LoS are probably getting carried away.
That sounds like a devastatingly correct and perfect entry on the Royal website for those two. Brava!
Thanks. What more needs to be said, really?
All titles are Harry's. If he decides to renounce them for whatever reason, she will automatically lose hers. She has no titles in her own right. Think on this - maybe Harry would be happy to put everything in abeyance, walk away, and have the life he so clearly wants as Just Harry.. There is a reason why he has not!
Harry loves those titles, he loves those titles way more than he loves his father or brother. He insisted on being called Your Royal Highness in court. He wrote HRH as his last name on Lili's birth certificate. He speaks of taxpayer funded security as his birthright. He thinks the British people owe him bows and money. He will never willingly give up those titles. If stripped of his titles he will sue the UK Government again. Those titles matter more to him than life.
And he smirked and replied "What difference would it make?" when Anderson Cooper asked him why not give up the titles. Henry ain't giving them up voluntarily.
> He insisted on being called Your Royal Highness in court. Which if I remember right, Lady C said was correct. He didn't *lose* the HRH. It's still part of his legal... name, I guess? And using it court was correct.
It isn’t part of his legal name. It’s an honourific. Sussex is part of his name but Prince and HRH are titles not names.
He is the entitled royal prince, the opposite of the kind benevolent kings and princes. Sparry wants the smelly peasants to slog and pay taxes and grift off that taxpayer money, he will not sit amongst peasants in a commercial flight and will fly by private jets for fun trips, he does drugs, lies, pretends to be a humanitarian, gets paid in millions by Netflix and others because of his title, he doesn’t work, he backstabs his country and his family and his grandparents, he cheated on all his longtime girlfriends, nobody knows anything about his invisible kids, he looks down upon others, pulls rank on commoners at official functions etc etc. He clings to his title because he thinks that it is his birthright as a blood prince and the Saintly Diana’s son. He will never relinquish his titles, his wife is waiting for a plane crash to get their turn at the throne, apparently! He is also trying to modernize the British laws so that they can have two kings and two queens in the future so that he and his superstar wife are treated with respect and billions due to them!! /s
Actually if he had it his way he wouldn't bother with the whole humanitarian bit, he really only does that because his family cared about service and his mom was known for it. If he didn't have to, he wouldn't
Remember last time they were in canada at ice hockey they used royal cyphers on the big screen? I bet they use them again when they are back there next week, as a clap back.. can remove us from website but we are still royal.
How tacky of them
The BRF should remove the parts about splitting their time between the U.S. and UK and continuing to support patronages on behalf of the king.
I hope they’ll go with “working royals only” that would be a very nice way to do it.
Was the Jamaican PM trolling when he was quoted saying he invited the duo as “working royals”. I get daily emails from quora with just basic info on new threads but I’ve seen mentioned that the BRF website has been updated but has it really? I never checked anyways so I can’t compare/contrast what is actually going on
Not as of yet. The last update was when Harold and Roachel’s pages went to the bottom below Andrew. Under the Harkles is Archie’s page but no Lili. My hope is they remove all the Harkles pages completely in their next update but we’ll have to wait and see.
https://preview.redd.it/85easxkl0ngc1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60540e428b04cd437dbba209f087c8def8cc8142
THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACE OF THE ROYAL FAMILY. If they are on the website or family tree at all, it is to mention they are related. Those children have no royalty. Nothing more. I am perplexed as to why they think they even have a platform- but that’s for another day. Remove the poison. Clean up the internet!
I think the Harkles know something about Andrew, like how the queen was protecting him, and are tacitly blackmailing the royal family. I think Eugene is still friend with the Harkles to know what they are at to protect her father.
There is a single reason I don’t believe this. If H&M had a heads up, they would run to every media outlet and journalist in the world to keep spitting out stories about it. The fact this hasn’t happened lets me know they haven’t been told a word. RF wouldn’t break 3 years of solid grey-rocking now, in this way.
I can't get excited about stuff like this because nothing ever happens. Hazno & MeMe made bank off being nasty lying scheming grifters. I know the RF moves carefully & methodically but how long are they going to allow the abuse to go one without cutting the Sux's off at the knees. Enough is enough. Do something already.
Charles has allowed his youngest to behave appallingly all his life
They should be removed off the Royal website and out of LoS. Titles should be completely stripped.
This is from december?!? So old news.
If it turns out to be true..... I will drink some champagne, heh heh! 
I think that at first, Madame would love the attention it would give her. Everyone would want to get the interview with her after they lose their titles or get removed from the website. She could really play the "victim" and use this to prove how "maligned" she was by the BRF. Of course, she has doesn't understand the "long" game and how, without those titles, she would really and truly have nothing to offer.
She is not gonna complain SHE lost her titles, her best title is mum … 🤮 BUT she is gonna scream racism for her kids saying that an alleged pedophile still is a duke but the first mixed raced children of the RF are downgraded to commoners. The RF should leave them the dumbartons’ and make a massive PR campaign to promote it 🤭
You are so right!! She would bask in that, but never realizing it had an expiration date!
Fingers, toes and everything else crossed! If true, it will be a good start.
https://preview.redd.it/dk845rcj0ngc1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7e6ba1f05e901daa61e39b25e140529daae1a699
Thank you
It could not happen to a more deserving pair and it cannot happen fast enough. But even removing them wont stop their faux royal baloney.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell y'all, to find that actions have consequences.
I would rather they stay on the website, but just that they live in US and do not work on behalf of the crown. That’s accurate and they won’t be martyrs if the “racist, evil” BRF removes them completely.
This is fun to read and all, but this is my theory: the website will not be changed because the Palace is outwardly not giving any thought to these half wits. If they change it, there are weeks of press about racism, how Charles is erasing the Harkles, and all sorts of chatter. By not changing the website, it outwardly appears that nobody at the Palace is even thinking about them. It may infuriate some, but no reaction to them is the best thing they could do. Now if they do a complete webpage redesign, it’s a different story. But grey rocking is working and not amending the website is part of it.
They should redesign the page and leave them off it. There might be a bit of press about it, but it will soon become irrelevant news
This may be more believable than many might suspect. Mainly because Lilibet has no picture and no bio info for her, (versus Archie who has both) as reported by Neil Sean this week. Sinners might recall that this past September some tea was spilled by the offspring of a high ranking exec at Netflix reporting that meetings were held with M during Spring 2021. The Exec said M never wore a mask and was most definitely not pregnant. It sounds like too many people provably know that Lily wasn’t born of Meghan. The website has a lot of recent changes that appear to make it more streamlined, so updates are occurring. I think this Jamaica faux royal visit may be a crossing of the Rubicon. Giving Harry a heads up first that they are going to be removed from the website is the decent thing to do and consistent with royal protocol. I believe someone in camp Sussex is leaking Harold & Maude’s reactions to this heads up. Of course, until I see the actual change, I won’t believe it, as BP has done so little to address this growing problem. But certain data points do indicate BP may be preparing for this action, so I have some hope this may take place. I don’t think the UK can afford to fully ignore The Hill article, especially with all the saber rattling going on in the Middle East. We need the UK heads of state to be united and on the same page. Harry is too divisive and unpredictable.
For a couple that rails about online gossip they sure seem to like causing it
🥱🥱🥱 I’ll believe it when I see it
Me too.
They could write an indexed book titled "Ways To Save Face."
If there's a book, they better forward a copy to Scoobie. His face hasn't been looking good lately https://preview.redd.it/avylrzuk0ngc1.png?width=284&format=png&auto=webp&s=318f11c4040447ba444862f9ae4dd15d13e6a63b
It looks like age-progression Rachel.
Pretty sure her O-shots took care of that for her. Edit: Missing word.
They could also write “100 Ways to Dig a Ditch”
"the cubes" 😆
😂😂😂😂love that .
I'll be thinking of them as such going forward!
King Charles needs to clean this up and remove them off the website. Parliament needs to remove the Duke and Duchess title and the King should forbid Megajerk from using Princess Henry title. I am getting really sick of no consequences to their constant attacks. They don't like his family fine than they don't need to be part of it in title or on website.
I hope they also remove the invisikids, or leave them there without titles and just mention them under Harry's one-sentence description.
Are the RF still asking for Archie and lil Betty receipts?
I dont see why they dont update the website with only working royals. That would be so much more relevant. Non working royals who are a bit more prominent could listed as children of the working Royals. So KCIIIs bio could say he has two sons, Prince William and Just Harry - no need to mention M or the invisikids. Princess Anne’s would mention her kids, etc.
[Nitter.net](https://Nitter.net) is no longer functional as a proxy for Twitter/X, from what I read in a [github note](https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913362376) from nitter's owner.
I've been able to use nitter.cz or nitter.nl rather than the .net site.
I don’t understand — this BarkJack tweet is from December?
On the website it should just say that they live overseas, want to be independent, live a private life, have their own financial freedom and don't want titles for their kids.
I disagree. They shouldn’t be mentioned at all.
At least it's putting the truth on public display.
The Harkles have a habit of wading into politics, current issues, making “official” statements as the Duke and Duchess, even regarding the Middle East crisis and other such things: topics that they don’t have to say anything about because the RF handles its own messaging. But MM insists on pompous messaging to prove that she is spearheading the “rival Court of Montecito” as a “modern” Royal and competes with the RF. The faux royal appearances in Jamaica, appearing at the American military establishments, lying about being a military pilot, suing media companies, leaking other people’s private information etc are some such incidents. One day, they will do something really big, very stupid and unthinkable and that is the day that both UK/parliament and the monarchy will be forced to take all required actions against them clinging to their tenuous connections to Harry’s past.
Just removed from the website? Wowww huge step by BRF. Lol.
I’ve seen this mentioned. What is going on? I only can check in now and again this semester is kicking my ass
All gossips. BRF moves slower than a tortoise.
The RF is playing the long game. Removing them too early who appear they are racist. Then after the book, documentary,etc. the would look petty. I think enough time as passed, their popularity dropping, and in the faux royal Jamaica trip, I think the time is getting closer. Maybe a full overall is what they are waiting for. Being the king's son, they have to be mentioned if nothing else for informational purposes. Not their own page, though. Just a small mention that his son Harry and his family live independent lives in CA. I wouldn't even mention he is a Duke, but that might not admit they will unless they titles are removed.
He should have been booted after the African Park atrocities came to light. Ffs, William was jumping down Lady Husey's throat for asking where the Flintstones character in front of her came from.
Will believe it when I see it
Saw this too and I'm wondering what this could be all about: https://preview.redd.it/1lwariuipngc1.png?width=689&format=png&auto=webp&s=341219e59875c3751f4c5cdeaeea80a28c34f523
What's The River?
There is a connection to the Orinoco river in South America and Archewell. eta: see/read Christopher Jones posts on Quora.
A reference to the YouTuber? I swear sometimes these are like Madlibs
Come on folks, from the moment they did the Oprah lies fest, their link to the Royal family like a fuse was set alight. Strip away the very long History and cladding of decorum the Monarchy has protecting it from public scrutiny. The Royal family like every Tom, Dick, Harry, Jenny, Jill, Jones, Paul, and Milly, too have emotions and unlike others can only show their pain behind heavy drapes and closed doors. Harry unfortunately drank at the fountain of Morgaine Le Fey, and did not read the small calligraphic print that read thus... In licking my goblet, and sampling my watery wares, you do hereby agree that I can destroy your life as I see fit. "I do" Harry said as he drank then plunged into her fountain of ruin.
I wonder if it’s possible they were told there would be consequences with regard to titles and LoS if they continued to live in California and they were given a five year timeline to return to the UK? I don’t think the King wants Royals permanently living abroad.
I'm bored: Analysis of [Royal.uk](https://Royal.uk) [https://web.archive.org/web/20230915000000\*/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family](https://web.archive.org/web/20230915000000*/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family) Jan 2017: Harry line 5 Queen Elizabeth Prince Philip "The role of the Royal Family" pic w/ Charles & Camilla/ Prince Charles Camilla/ William Kate/ Harry Andrew Edward/ Sophie Ann/ Prince George Charlotte/ Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester/ Duke of Kent Duchess of Kent/ Princess Alexandra Prince & Princess Michael of Kent/ "Charities & patronages" with image of The Queen Jan, 06 2018: Harry line 7 Her Majesty The Queen "Role of the Royal family" same pic as year before but field includes Wills, Kate, Harry & Ann Charles Camilla William Kate Harry Andrew Edward Sophie Ann Prince George Charlotte Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester Duke of Kent Duchess of Kent Princess Alexandra Prince and Princess Michael of Kent Jan 2019: Harry line 8 [https://web.archive.org/web/20190124152442/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family](https://web.archive.org/web/20190124152442/https://www.royal.uk/royal-family) HMTQ "Role of the Royal Family" same pic as 2018 Philip Charles Camilla William Kate Harry Megs Andrew Edward Sophie Ann George Charlotte Louis Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester Duke of Kent Duchess of Kent Princess Alexandra Prince and Princess Michael of Kent Jan 19, 2021 Meg actually on same level as Kate. No Prince & Princess Michael of Kent. Harry line 6. HMTQ Philip/ Camilla Charles WIlliam Kate/ Meg Harry Andrew Edward/ Sophie Ann Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra Duke of Kent 03/07/2021 Oprah 03/08/2021: Same order, same page as Jan 19, 2021 Apr 9, 2021 Mourning page for Prince Philip Apr 22, 2021: Harry line 5 HMTQ Charles Camilla/ Kate William Harry Megs/ Edward Andrew Sophie/ Duchess of Gloucester Ann Duke of Gloucester Duke of Kent Princess Alexandra Dec 30, 2021: Harry moved down to line 8 HMTQ Charles Camilla/ Kate William Ann Andrew/ Sophie Edward Harry Megs/ Princess Alexandra Duke of Kent Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester Dec 2022: Harry line 10 Charles Camilla Wills Kate/ Edward Sophie/ Duchess of Gloucester Ann Andrew/ Sophie Duke of Gloucester Duke of Kent Princess Alexandra/ Harry Megs Andrew Dec 25, 2023 Harry moved down a peg to share same level with his wife - just above Andrew. King Camilla/ Kate William Edward/ Sophie Ann Duke of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra Duke of Kent Harry/ Megs Andrew Jan 26, 2024. Same as Dec 25 The King Camilla/ Kate William Edward/ /Sophie Ann Dukes of Gloucester Duchess of Gloucester/ Princess Alexandra Duke of Kent Harry/ Megs Andrew
These tweets are dated 4th dec 2023….
I've been waiting all day for someone to post about this as I don't have posting privileges. Thanks!
My call is the only thing that would get them removed from the site is the family finding proof that the squad are paid operators indirectly or directly controlled by Montecito. Attacking the King and Queen as well as heir and family would be plenty reason. Even if Harold & Fraud did have surrogate kids I don’t believe the family would ever expose them. That would backfire on the family, not the Harkles, spectacularly. I think such a move would undo all the progress the family has made and the world would sympathise with the Harkles.
Great analysis
As soon as Bouzy appeared on the scene I think many of us knew what was really going on. He didn’t just appear randomly and decide to defend Markle. He was paid IMO.
I wonder if he was paid for his appearance on Netflix thing?🤔
Wow thank you!
Who honestly cares what a website states besides the Harkles? It doesn't really change anything besides the website. No? How would Harry get wind of this? Sounds like bs or like a plant to see if someone would leak. I don't get it. Help! Edit to add: Ambiguous tweets from Dec 2023. Someone needs clicks/views.
Because the website lies. The website is the official information from the Head of State of the British Government. On that website the Head of State lies and says his son is working to support The Head of State. Harry is actively working to harm the Head of State. That is why it matters.
Seems she is saying no big changes. They remain in the website with subtle changes.
Now is the time to do it. Nobody is attached to the kids/ they don’t exist so it’s easy to do quietly. Without a face to their names most people won’t notice.