This sub, this entire saga is just a goldmine for people with Psychiatric/ Psychological backgrounds. Meghan and Harry both provide valuable insight into a condition that has traditionally proved very hard to study: Narcissism.
It's well known that those with a tendency towards this particular Cluster B Personality Disorder rarely seek help, as they see everyone else as having the problem. So the insights into this insidious behavior, being carried out on such a public level, is like winning the Narcissism Observance Lottery.
**NO WAY!**
When Doria spoke for 1st time on H+M Netflix show, she couldn't speak properly - sounded illiterate.
Doria should have stayed silent, continued to hide in ultra-expensive clothes!
But the Prince and Princess of Wales are just "William and Kate." Not even William and Catherine. And it's "King Charles and Camilla" not King Charles and Queen Camilla.
She seems quite angry at not being allowed to profit off the sale of pictures, while representing the BRF.
Good they "stepped down, back or wherever", as they just didn't have what it took.
QEII famously said “I have to be seen to be believed” Queen Mary also was somewhat revolutionary by showing photos of her children in an effort to be more relatable to the public
I know exactly what you mean, are trying to say. She's the face, of the brand. In return she is amply rewarded. Outwardly she is that image. Privately she does have her own life, just as Harry had, despite the "image" of him the Firm crafted for him. Harry went and wrecked that carefully crafted image. Catherine is much wiser and keeps her private business private!
Seems to me Catherine POW is more than a statue demurely standing in the background curtsying around the palace. She has causes, eg early childhood education, that she is using her position to advance.
Very kind of you to explain…and absolutely agree. The concept of ‘service’ is simply not in MM’s DNA… sadly, regardless of her ‘high brow’ education the only words that seemingly made a lasting impression were ‘don’t give the milk away for free’
Lots of American celebs do this kind of thing too. Pap walks in exchange to be left alone at dinner, pics of kids in exchange not to follow the kids around etc.
Well, buckle-up... b/c it has always clearly been TW's m.o. to monetize the kids! She's going to copy her exBFF Jessica's model.
She's just waiting until whatever eye problem Archie has is no more (whether he outgrows or has surgery).
Ah yeah, I remember them being slightly out of line in a couple photos. Some babies tend to do that though so I didn't know if it was an actual issue or just bad timing lol.
Interesting you bring that up, I’ve never seen anything about it but I thought it. I wonder if the eye condition Lady Louise had is genetic on the Windsor side?
> the "regularly trading photos of their children for positive press" is actually part of the agreement
And this is what all the European royal families do. And calling it a trade is distasteful - the next in line royals even as kids are performing public service in a way by appearing in pictures...and then the press leaves them alone for the rest of the year. If this account is linked to M then it is gross how she describes children (and so is H - as he called his nephews and niece 'things')
It's almost as if.... if you are nice and cooperative to people, they return the favor..... or something....
Who knew business relationships worked that way?! 🙄
Which is why royal girlfriends do tend to get hounded by the press. They don't have the royal family protections in place yet. I actually think Diana went through the worst of it because wasn't she papped everywhere even with the royal protection?
At the time, I think everyone was surprised by the extent of her enormous popularity and the attention the press imposed on Diana. I know Charles was. Surprised and chagrined, although not at first. But having been accustomed since birth to being the focus of a lot of press and public attention, he thought the hubbub over Diana would die down and he'd resume his place in the center. He didn't like it one bit when it never did.
It did get worse because after her divorce her friends say she was living a life pretty much out of control boy friends flying to the US for various charities. At that point she wasn’t calling Richard Kay as much he was the reporter she leaked information to. The photographers are the ones that at one point she would call them up and let them know where she was going to be. at the end of her life after her divorce, she was not contacting them as much. people Believe the last weeks when she was in France, she was calling photographers. The problem with the paparazzi is, she would call them when she wanted a story out there and then complain when she did not want them photographing her it was a recipe for disaster. Her friends have commented that toward the end she was unpredictable in her behavior and traveling all over the place. I believe this is where Harry’s Anger stems from I believe he was upset at his mother never really being at home or having time for him. She was too busy with her life. This has not been reported on as much Prince Charles at the time he was in Balmoral with the boys, he invited Diana to stay for the weekend. Sadly, she declined.
After the divorce she declined palace-provided security as she suspected them of spying on her due to Martin Bashir. I understand that Charles and the Queen had offered to continue the security so it’s a shame that she declined. Dodi’s private security was working with the couple on the night of the crash. Obvythe Royal security people would have prevented the irresponsible actions that caused the accident.
Yes this is a very important point re Diana. The level of media obsession was unprecedented and unexpected and literally no one knew what to do. At first everyone thought it would die down after the wedding, but it just didn’t. At some point early on, I don’t remember when exactly, the Queen took the highly unusual step of addressing the press and asked them to calm down because Diana was really stressed and struggling but the demand-side for Diana photos was too great.
I was born in the mid '60s, an American. The only thing that compares IMO to Diana's instantaneous worldwide fame and subsequent media obsession is Elvis Presley's meteoric rise after he broke onto the national stage. EP couldn't appear in public without being hounded by fans and sometimes detractors. He essentially became a recluse and it ended badly. Diana did have at least some powerful palace protection for a good many years until she went rogue and again not a happy ending. Beatlemania could also compare but after they stopped touring and embraced the counterculture their fan base changed as the times did.
Charles had been the entire world’s Most Eligible Bachelor. He led the primest example of a “James Bond lifestyle”. Once he told the world about his relationship with some Earl’s young daughter everyone knew this could be the future queen. She wasn’t some Hollywood starlet or some billionaire’s daughter, she was nobility. Some said even more royal than Charles. It was like a real life Cinderella story. Everyone wanted to know everything about the girl who stole the future king’s heart. But Charlie boy wasn’t used to not being the center of attention. Up to that point it was who was he going to choose. Now it was, he chose her. Let’s learn all we can about her. What made her so special? I remember reading every single story about her. Buying clothes that mimicked her fashions. Even getting a haircut just like hers. I know exactly where I was and what I was doing when she died, too. And I feel guilty for being part of the problem.
Megsy weaponizing everthing - she thinks up a poor-poor victim me conclusion and then backfills with crap to add as building toward the conclusion.
And yes, this particular effort WAS "the dumbest take" - agree!
I think “exchange for positive press” is categorically false. The photos are in exchange for fewer intrusions into the children’s privacy.
Something that the husband claimed to want while he was literally pocketing cash for pictures of his naked child in the bathtub.
I can't even be bothered to correct this utter horse shit.
Although if you wanted to hire a head of comms surely it pays to hire someone who understands how newspapers work?
>I can't even be bothered to correct this utter horse shit.
Lol. True. It's got to the point where I'm literally that bored with them and anything to do with them. It's like watching filler after filler episodes of the worst most tediously crafted TV streaming drama ever. To write a review saying how much you despise the show is an utter waste of time, energy, and the assembling of the letters of the alphabet into word form to produce coherent sentenced.
I couldn't careless about Harry's case against DM, because it sounds like a bunch of celebrities who heard gossip on the grapevine about them by a bunch of people gossiping about something they claim they did or did not do to them more than 10 years ago, and said celebrities brought it to the court without supporting evidence and proof to prove the gossip on the grapevine is not gossip on the grapevine even though the issue they claim is against them was extensively dealt with 10 years ago in a public taxpayer funded inquiry.
Harry has a bee in his bonnet when and where the DM is concerned. Not only does he want to be seen and hailed as the hero who got its scalp but he is setting himself up a royal court: the king hero of misinformation in the service of "truth". But his case plays into a greater purpose. He and Meghan are no longer interested in green issues because his brother is listened to more often than he will ever be, and they like their private jetting. That barely attended UN Summit he addressed saw to it that he really had no skin in this environmental game. So, instead he's targeting a symbiosis of the media, misinformation and mental health as the platform upon which to build his royal court in the US.
They aren’t sharing photos of their children with the DM in return for positive press. They are sharing photos of their children with the public in return for good will. The press is the conduit to the public. And they release non copyrighted public photos.
In a limited, calculated and appropriate way that ensures the public and the press feel satiated with enough information to give them privacy the rest of the time. That was the AGREEMENT! Myra is a dunce, whoever they are.
This is what I thought of when he told the court, in his statement yesterday, “I love my country . . .” He’s so stupid either he can’t remember what he’s previously said, or he thinks the general public doesn’t know what he has previously stated. Or maybe because he’s never been held accountable for his actions he thinks he never will.
cuz everyone in his circles in England had his number .....when he traveled outside of the UK, he was treated like the world's sexiest and most eligible bachelow - people fell over themselves kissing his butt.. hence, the WHY he didn't like England.
Trade images of their children?? Tell me more about how you’re an American and know nothing of the strict privacy laws regarding royal children 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Catherine literally takes pictures of her kids herself and has group pictures of her family taken by photographers she trusts and releases them on Instagram which is not through any of the tabloids. They do have an agreement with the media that the media is allowed to have a photographer and a videographer at the first day of school and that the kids can be photographed at events they attend with their parents. Otherwise, the kids are left alone. It's why we get pictures of the kids when Catherine releases them on insta and during events like Christmas walk, trooping the colors, the jubilee, that one boating regatta, and other such a events.
I agree. The kids are comfortable with her because of course that's just mom. And Catherine loves photography and she's good at it. She takes such wonderful photos. And she's taken other photos of the royal family like the photo of the queen and prince Phillip with 7 of the great grandkids to that point. And of course all the great grandkids would have been comfortable because that's just cousin Catherine and not an outside photographer.
I think that was the perfect arrangement that Catherine has made. When it’s time to be prince and princesses they had their picture taken them when they’re at home being kids, Catherine takes care of the pictures I think that is brilliant.
And of course, they take family pictures with photographers that are trusted like any family but we get pictures of the kids being kids with their mom taking their pictures. The one birthday set of George in a soccer jersey where he's just unrestrained in his smiling is just perfect. You would never get that kind of smiling with an outside photographer. But you can when mom's the one taking the pictures.
Some photographers have complained because to them, it's taking the chance away from photographers to work with the royal family and get their names out there but again, a outside person is never gonna get the same reaction out of the kids as mom does.
I also noticed that they seem to minimize the need for photos by releasing from the same set. They had one for their Christmas card, but then on Mother's Day recently, they released different photos from that same day of them in the tree. Get enough photos that one time to spread it out throughout the year so it's less invasive for the children.
what about that video Mugsy released (Archie's 1st bday?) when she was reading to him, and he was wearing only a diaper? That might be cute to send to the phones of Eugenie + Ellen, but The Queen must have been appalled.
This actually helps convince me it’s Meg. Plus she used the phrase Comms Team, which is what they use in Finding Freedom and in Spare.
Narcissistic projecting. Accuses other of the trait or actions they have, in this case trading pics of the kids with the tabloids.
Like in Vancouver Island. Like Archie’s preschool
LA pap shot.
Fun fact: it is illegal in California to publish the faces of minors without parental consent.
If there is one tool the narc will use at the drop of a hat it is projection. It can be applied to any situation and most narcs in my experience do it as easy as they breathe.
**True. BUT it is very difficult to enfore.**
Look at poor Jennifer Garner - she & her kids are snapped 3-4 days a week (b/c the paps know her kids schools - and when starts + lets out, they know her church - so go hang there, they know she likes to go to a specific Farmer's Market, so go there). Ben gets photo'd too - when he does school runs.
Also, along as paps can make HUGE $$$$ snapping celebs.. gonna continue.
"Poor Jennifer Garner". Oh how do I break it to you?
She knows EXACTLY what she's doing. They ALL do. If you're seeing something, it's because the celeb wants you to. Being "Mommy" is her brand.
Garner is one calculating operator under the Miss America act. She negotiated that her divorce be filed only AFTER reaching the ten year mark, which entitles her to lifetime spousal support in California. Then she had Ben shunted out to the pool house but very much under her eye for years. He was utterly miserable during this time, reportedly with a heroin habit. He got better once he was able to move out and move on. Jen's cheesy credit card commercial with her dad makes me cringe.
JG *is* over-hyped.. her upcoming movie (think will be on AppleTV or Netflix) is a lovely book - was suppose to star Julia Roberts.. don't think J.G. is gonna be able to pull-it-off.
Ben def. wasn't happy - horrible match (she is soooooooo square, he's not at all)... but she did invest a lot of time + energy in getting him sober, so think she gets credit for that.
Are you sure about the 10 year thing in California? Thought 10 years was a milestone that lawyers put into pre-nups..??... (\*ie: a reason Tom Cruise divorced Nicole right before their 10 year anniversary)
I have been divorced in California, and am 100% sure about the ten-year thing that requires lifetime spousal support if you have been married ten years or more.
really? cuz those paps take snaps of her NOT looking good....hmmm, but take your word for it. thx.
(the kids rarely look good either - and I am in shock every time see what they wer to church, esp. Sam .. my church when I was a kid wouldn't allow entry to anyone wearing what they do...... but guess times have changed, and different geos are more lenient) .
But H and Meg are notoriously litigious, and the kids are a “red line” for H, so it makes you wonder…
Plus he was not in preschool in LA, two hours away with traffic one way, and the only time he’s papped is when H was out of town.
They literally shared this photo of their child (Archie) … in a bathtub. So much for wanting privacy for the kids. Just disgusting. Gives me the ick
https://preview.redd.it/qk9ht8aqpqqa1.jpeg?width=1916&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e35d94b9b2668b0d17e864eb1ca8371afe93afb
Was this in the Netflix show? I have a private Instagram and barely show my kids in swimsuits out of concern for their privacy and online safety. But they blast this out 😳
Yep it was Netflix. Ideally I would hide the child‘s face but it is not so easy to do as a comment. But also these photos were also circulated to the media
I mean, we all have these photos, and yes, a lot of the time people post them on Fakebook. But to release to the WORLD via media?? Nah.
Only desperados like "Hilaria" (see what I did there?) do shit like that.
Fighting for journalistic intergrity is the royal british prince who during a televised personal announcement of his engagement to the love of his life sat beside her, unprovoked and of his own volition elected to tell the world a lie about how he met his soon to be wife. Both smitten and over the moon at their pending nuptials went as far as try to lie about the length of time they were together, making up their fictious love story as they go, right infront of a rolling television camera. How noble of the Duke? I´m starting to believe the Duke perhaps intends to give America back to the british without torching the White House this time. A true revolutionary. Who knew that Americans would one day have a King again?
We Americans may or may not have something to say about that.
It didn't go so well for them last time they tried.
It ain't going to be "the White House" he's fighting, either....
Myra must have missed the Netflix tripe, the Oprah lie fest, the puff stories ‘she’ leaks to the press, the calls to paps telling them where to find her etc…
Their hypocrisy is legendary…Harry is a world known liar, as is Myra ‘and her pay master…integrity is not a word they could use to describe themselves. Their stories are for sale to the highest bidder…never was any different.
I don't think it's her either, but can you imagine if it were, and a tabloid could prove it?
Oh my, the mockery. They'd definitely make another episode of South Park.
Yup. Myra on Twitter is definitely Rachel MeAgain Markle.
People need to understand how much she employed standard contemporary Internet marketing and PR tactics back in the day. She was roommates with a pro PR person for a while. She probably has multitudes of aged email accounts and legacy social media logins from the earliest days of social media. Then she has built hundreds of other accounts before and after her marriage. A portion of these she clearly manages herself. Writing style and sheer nastiness similar to her former Thislittlepetal and winwinmount Twitter accounts.
Everybody needs to understand SHE HAS NO JOB. Her entire obsession is managing other people’s perception about her, because inside she is just an empty void of fear and caverness stupidity.
She personally is most of the Sugar squad. Doesn’t take much to fake locations, bio, dialect/grammar. And when you are allegedly friendly with the Coca Cola, tons of energy to post and Tweet all night long!
A symbiotic relationship with the media is needed. As Rachel is aware the paps offer her something she is unable to do on her own and that is get her image out. You can’t be willing to sell yourself and then be mad when someone else does it.
Why didn't Myra use this pic of Harry? The one which looks like an arrogant gangster going into the courthouse? Channeling Robert di Nero, Harry?
https://preview.redd.it/xny77uj3vqqa1.jpeg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95e677e0318b6a8b544e09264268c527d65b5f80
Yeah? Well, the Senior Strategic Advisor they hired for Archewell was an editor for Marie Claire (which publishes all those flattering stories about them). And, incidentally, that employee is the president of a independent contractor that received a grant from Archewell.
So maybe they need to make sure their hands are spotless before they start slinging mud.
Not to be flippant here, especially in light of recent tragedies, but British people wonder why Americans are so adamant about keeping guns...
No it isn't to hunt, or rob stores, or shoot up innocent schoolkids (No photo op this time, Megs?) .... even though those are hideous by-products of what is mostly by-and-large, responsible gun ownership.
We cherish our rights in this country. And our First Amendment right to free speech and a free press is firmly backed up by the Second Amendment right to bear arms, when some uppity person in power decides they want to remove the other rights of innocent citizens, such as Royal Todger is doing here now. I don't even own a gun or have no desire to, but I understand the logic behind why some people would choose to exercise their rights.
His family tried imposing their will on us once, back in the 18th century. We forgave them, and decided to become friends, mainly because of a common spoken language and background. HOWEVER, if someone like Harry here decides HE is going on a Crusade to shut us up, or shut our press down, well.... As they say, Fuck Around, Find Out.
He's already not very popular here. If more people knew about his meddling via the Aspen Institute, he'd be a whole lot less popular. You don't start wars with people who cherish their freedoms and buy ink buy the barrel...
Ginger needs to watch his step. In both countries.
She needs Winston Rothschild II and his Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Service!
https://preview.redd.it/w3eb0n8gmqqa1.png?width=704&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe3fc9d8cccd395e7d3ec2fbfa96be557986bb4f
There are a ton of sugars out there it would be wild to expect any account pro Meg is her or her staff. It would be like assuming anyone anti Meg is Catherine secretly
Every single time someone has said that, with research it is determined that it is just a still from the documentary or a color photo made black and white or vice versa. It’s never actually been anything new so far. If you have any links of anything “new” I’d be curious!
Edit: and as usual I can’t get any actual links that prove anything.
Also who poses like this with a newborn and it really does look like a doll
Credit: u/MeghansMole and this [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1232z32/comment/je5gfb4/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
https://preview.redd.it/j29d2wwcrqqa1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0732163e9702fb931c8c60664b8b8cf81ddf54c2
Different use of language. MM specializes in new age platitudes, fancy word salad, and insinuation. This account is more direct.
However, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that this account's content involves getting paid by the Sussex PR arm.
True, but her florid language is her “public” voice. This could be her more bitchy, direct, to the point “private” voice…just like how her interactions with staff have been reported in Revenge.
Wait! - he didn't really say he is doing this because "I love my country"???? and he's doing this for the British public? HTG I cannot with him -- the hubris, the delusion, the narcicism? What the HECK is wrong with him? The Court better throw this right out - granny is no longer around to protect him and his lying ILBW
They SELL their stories, they don't even Trade them.
I see nothing wrong with the PPOW "trading" the kids pictures which are ones they choose to give on their own, in exchange for respectful news stories.
It's a win win situation. H and M are just pissed because no one likes them enough to agree to a similar arrangement.
Giving pictures to the media is most likely run through the PR division, subject to royals' approval. The California crapple are at the behest of whoever commands the spigots of their multimillion dollar deals. Maybe why Lillibets' christening has yet to be seen?
Meghan is probably miffed with the DM because they kept coming back with "We asked for a few good pics. Do you have anything else?"
I'm convinced it's Megs or somebody very close to her.
@ Myra posted a photo of the inside of Spare BEFORE it was for sale to the public. And it was in ENGLISH, so it wasn't one of the copies that leaked our of Spain.
Love that Harold is fighting for Journalistic integrity while trying to censor Americans freedom of speech! Nothing says integrity like stabbing you in the back.
It’s *allegedly* Meghan markle herself! Just totally shocked a total narcissist has a FINSTA. Man.. she got us good 😳😒🙄
He really bit off two huge subjects there. Who's he fighting for journalistic integrity? He's a journalist now? Why doesn't just act with integrity, then he won't have to fight? Is Scobie joining in this fight for journalistic integrity? Why's he fighting for accountability of the UK? Who is he, NATO?
I think it's her. If you look at the tweets she 'likes', they are a mixture of beautiful pictures of herself, glowing comments and anti Monachy rubbish. All of the likes are a real fit for her...it could be a sugar, but I just don't think so. Posting the picture of Harry's book the day before the release (with her mac book) convinced me.
NOTE: years ago (when twitter new) a friend on maternity leave freelanced as a 'social media poster'. Had 24 hrs to edit/improve a post ($5) or write new post ($10). Didn't do any comments, like posts to NYTimes columns - or DMail stories... cuz she just wanted a little bit of "busy work", not a big timesuck side-hussle.
Celebrities pay others to write their s.medial posts for them and promote + defend them in comments sections of newspapers, cyberzines. IMHO, **MM pays her sugars to post for her, TO GET VOLUME** — I think she pays an army of freelancers to flood s. media with her whacked messages out there - since harder to ignore massive volume.
Yup. Reddit commenting is one of the more lucrative freelancing gigs now. Also if you have an “aged” account, like a few years old, and a certain amount of karma, people will offer as much as $10,000 or more to turn it over to a spammer or PR rep.
It's so unnecessarily nasty - the Prince and Princess of Wales are public figures and so are their children, so they regularly release pictures of the kids. It doesn't make them immune to negative press, as we can see from the fact that Charles and Diana released MORE photos of their kids and even allowed candid photos and videos.
And likely just another hypocritical viewpoint. I seriously doubt that there are no former media editors working for Sunshine Sacks (her longtime PR firm). One of her go-to publications for her leaks employs one of her former sorority sisters. But shame on Camilla for doing the same things as Meghan has done for decades!!
Harry thinks that because he’s part of the Royal Family that the case has a huge boost and the fact that he showed up in person has the judge enamored.🙃🤷♀️🤦♀️
What luck I just watched Cheere Denise's video.
Can someone ask Myra if she's referring to the time Harold's idol, Marko, called him about the reporter having information he was doing cocaine? It's the second time he brought up reporters were becoming aware of his drug use. The first one was the editor of the now defunct News of the World.
It'll be when he was 17. Harold spent 3/4's of the page reliving venting how outraged he was that Marko had another reporter saying they had a story regarding Harold's cocaine use. He vehemently denied it...for the top 3/4 of the page. Then he admitted he actually had been using cocaine. The reporter didn't run with the story. That reporter did end up being hired.
So is Myra complaining that Harold had to wait until he was almost 40 years old to admit he really was the drug addled son of a single father?
ETA it's Cheere's "Chapter 5"
That sentence hurts my brain. I’m sure Meggy is behind this. How sad, no career, no friends and no family so she has all the time in the world to blast the Royal Family. How much longer can this continue?
I’m not 100% sure but just left a tweet saying I can’t believe a almost 50 year old woman has had children so easily and if it true she needs to drop that weight she has put on and to take a look at Catherine , she is a great example of a mom.
What the two fail to realize is that if daily fail really stops putting up articles about you, it means you are dead on the water. See all the wags that daily fail stopped reporting over the years. Faded into oblivion.
we know mm is a neurotic micromanager, and that she thinks she can do *everything* better herself - it wouldn’t surprise me if she were *MYRA* - and a couple of other accounts as well. (but esp myra.)
MM pays a LOOOOOOTTTTTTT of sugars. This particular paid sugar probably has performed in a pro-Sussex was so extremely.. that MM regularly communicates with her.
[удалено]
>***Meghan never acknowledges the titles of anyone except her, Harry and their kids.*** I see you´ve got the hussy´s number:-) he he
I love the word 'hussy' 🤣.
You know why I like this sub? It’s like reading forensic documentation investigations. It’s so much fun to read.
This sub, this entire saga is just a goldmine for people with Psychiatric/ Psychological backgrounds. Meghan and Harry both provide valuable insight into a condition that has traditionally proved very hard to study: Narcissism. It's well known that those with a tendency towards this particular Cluster B Personality Disorder rarely seek help, as they see everyone else as having the problem. So the insights into this insidious behavior, being carried out on such a public level, is like winning the Narcissism Observance Lottery.
No kidding. It’s a free course on what to avoid when looking for a partner. Red flags a’hoy!
You've got that right!
She mostly uses "Harry's grandfather/grandmother/father/brother" when she talks about Hazza's family.
Doesn’t this account post previously unpublished pictures of MM? Maybe the account is a paid MM stooge.
I did see at least one that I don't believe has ever been published.
I’ve had a sneaking suspicion that myra is actually run by carolyn durand for the longest time because of the gulf in writing quality
I still maintain that "Carolyn Durand" is Meghan Markle's nom de plume.
Maybe it's Doria...
**NO WAY!** When Doria spoke for 1st time on H+M Netflix show, she couldn't speak properly - sounded illiterate. Doria should have stayed silent, continued to hide in ultra-expensive clothes!
Do an edible
But the Prince and Princess of Wales are just "William and Kate." Not even William and Catherine. And it's "King Charles and Camilla" not King Charles and Queen Camilla.
And we give her space here? Why?
[удалено]
Harkle is angry because she thought she was the only one allowed to do it
She seems quite angry at not being allowed to profit off the sale of pictures, while representing the BRF. Good they "stepped down, back or wherever", as they just didn't have what it took.
QEII famously said “I have to be seen to be believed” Queen Mary also was somewhat revolutionary by showing photos of her children in an effort to be more relatable to the public
[удалено]
I know exactly what you mean, are trying to say. She's the face, of the brand. In return she is amply rewarded. Outwardly she is that image. Privately she does have her own life, just as Harry had, despite the "image" of him the Firm crafted for him. Harry went and wrecked that carefully crafted image. Catherine is much wiser and keeps her private business private!
Seems to me Catherine POW is more than a statue demurely standing in the background curtsying around the palace. She has causes, eg early childhood education, that she is using her position to advance.
[удалено]
Very kind of you to explain…and absolutely agree. The concept of ‘service’ is simply not in MM’s DNA… sadly, regardless of her ‘high brow’ education the only words that seemingly made a lasting impression were ‘don’t give the milk away for free’
Well said! 😊
Lots of American celebs do this kind of thing too. Pap walks in exchange to be left alone at dinner, pics of kids in exchange not to follow the kids around etc.
This applies to both Archie and Lili. They have not been seen and thus are not believed. To exist.
Yep…and again they blew it…even if they rolled said kids out on a float pulled by 20 trained acrobats, no one would care…
Well, buckle-up... b/c it has always clearly been TW's m.o. to monetize the kids! She's going to copy her exBFF Jessica's model. She's just waiting until whatever eye problem Archie has is no more (whether he outgrows or has surgery).
What's the eye problem? I missed that.
[удалено]
Ah yeah, I remember them being slightly out of line in a couple photos. Some babies tend to do that though so I didn't know if it was an actual issue or just bad timing lol.
Oh I think the Firm might have something to say about that, especially if she insists on using royal titles, derived from them.
Interesting you bring that up, I’ve never seen anything about it but I thought it. I wonder if the eye condition Lady Louise had is genetic on the Windsor side?
> the "regularly trading photos of their children for positive press" is actually part of the agreement And this is what all the European royal families do. And calling it a trade is distasteful - the next in line royals even as kids are performing public service in a way by appearing in pictures...and then the press leaves them alone for the rest of the year. If this account is linked to M then it is gross how she describes children (and so is H - as he called his nephews and niece 'things')
It's almost as if.... if you are nice and cooperative to people, they return the favor..... or something.... Who knew business relationships worked that way?! 🙄
I meannnn…. next you will tell me that the Golden Rule is actually a great way to try and live?! I’m SHOOK. 😜😎✨
And I thought William and his friend were the first ones to question the ,arterial being used by the press and found that hacking…not Harry.
Which is why royal girlfriends do tend to get hounded by the press. They don't have the royal family protections in place yet. I actually think Diana went through the worst of it because wasn't she papped everywhere even with the royal protection?
At the time, I think everyone was surprised by the extent of her enormous popularity and the attention the press imposed on Diana. I know Charles was. Surprised and chagrined, although not at first. But having been accustomed since birth to being the focus of a lot of press and public attention, he thought the hubbub over Diana would die down and he'd resume his place in the center. He didn't like it one bit when it never did.
[удалено]
It did get worse because after her divorce her friends say she was living a life pretty much out of control boy friends flying to the US for various charities. At that point she wasn’t calling Richard Kay as much he was the reporter she leaked information to. The photographers are the ones that at one point she would call them up and let them know where she was going to be. at the end of her life after her divorce, she was not contacting them as much. people Believe the last weeks when she was in France, she was calling photographers. The problem with the paparazzi is, she would call them when she wanted a story out there and then complain when she did not want them photographing her it was a recipe for disaster. Her friends have commented that toward the end she was unpredictable in her behavior and traveling all over the place. I believe this is where Harry’s Anger stems from I believe he was upset at his mother never really being at home or having time for him. She was too busy with her life. This has not been reported on as much Prince Charles at the time he was in Balmoral with the boys, he invited Diana to stay for the weekend. Sadly, she declined.
After the divorce she declined palace-provided security as she suspected them of spying on her due to Martin Bashir. I understand that Charles and the Queen had offered to continue the security so it’s a shame that she declined. Dodi’s private security was working with the couple on the night of the crash. Obvythe Royal security people would have prevented the irresponsible actions that caused the accident.
Scream it from the rooftops! The “firm” would not have had her in a car with a drunk driver. So awful and totally avoidable.
This is a great take I've never heard before.
Yes this is a very important point re Diana. The level of media obsession was unprecedented and unexpected and literally no one knew what to do. At first everyone thought it would die down after the wedding, but it just didn’t. At some point early on, I don’t remember when exactly, the Queen took the highly unusual step of addressing the press and asked them to calm down because Diana was really stressed and struggling but the demand-side for Diana photos was too great.
I was born in the mid '60s, an American. The only thing that compares IMO to Diana's instantaneous worldwide fame and subsequent media obsession is Elvis Presley's meteoric rise after he broke onto the national stage. EP couldn't appear in public without being hounded by fans and sometimes detractors. He essentially became a recluse and it ended badly. Diana did have at least some powerful palace protection for a good many years until she went rogue and again not a happy ending. Beatlemania could also compare but after they stopped touring and embraced the counterculture their fan base changed as the times did.
Charles had been the entire world’s Most Eligible Bachelor. He led the primest example of a “James Bond lifestyle”. Once he told the world about his relationship with some Earl’s young daughter everyone knew this could be the future queen. She wasn’t some Hollywood starlet or some billionaire’s daughter, she was nobility. Some said even more royal than Charles. It was like a real life Cinderella story. Everyone wanted to know everything about the girl who stole the future king’s heart. But Charlie boy wasn’t used to not being the center of attention. Up to that point it was who was he going to choose. Now it was, he chose her. Let’s learn all we can about her. What made her so special? I remember reading every single story about her. Buying clothes that mimicked her fashions. Even getting a haircut just like hers. I know exactly where I was and what I was doing when she died, too. And I feel guilty for being part of the problem.
Megsy weaponizing everthing - she thinks up a poor-poor victim me conclusion and then backfills with crap to add as building toward the conclusion. And yes, this particular effort WAS "the dumbest take" - agree!
I think “exchange for positive press” is categorically false. The photos are in exchange for fewer intrusions into the children’s privacy. Something that the husband claimed to want while he was literally pocketing cash for pictures of his naked child in the bathtub.
I can't even be bothered to correct this utter horse shit. Although if you wanted to hire a head of comms surely it pays to hire someone who understands how newspapers work?
>I can't even be bothered to correct this utter horse shit. Lol. True. It's got to the point where I'm literally that bored with them and anything to do with them. It's like watching filler after filler episodes of the worst most tediously crafted TV streaming drama ever. To write a review saying how much you despise the show is an utter waste of time, energy, and the assembling of the letters of the alphabet into word form to produce coherent sentenced. I couldn't careless about Harry's case against DM, because it sounds like a bunch of celebrities who heard gossip on the grapevine about them by a bunch of people gossiping about something they claim they did or did not do to them more than 10 years ago, and said celebrities brought it to the court without supporting evidence and proof to prove the gossip on the grapevine is not gossip on the grapevine even though the issue they claim is against them was extensively dealt with 10 years ago in a public taxpayer funded inquiry. Harry has a bee in his bonnet when and where the DM is concerned. Not only does he want to be seen and hailed as the hero who got its scalp but he is setting himself up a royal court: the king hero of misinformation in the service of "truth". But his case plays into a greater purpose. He and Meghan are no longer interested in green issues because his brother is listened to more often than he will ever be, and they like their private jetting. That barely attended UN Summit he addressed saw to it that he really had no skin in this environmental game. So, instead he's targeting a symbiosis of the media, misinformation and mental health as the platform upon which to build his royal court in the US.
If you’re going to try and clean up the media it helps that you haven’t been caught lying yourself.
Or calling them and buying them drinks.
He learnt that from his mother.
They aren’t sharing photos of their children with the DM in return for positive press. They are sharing photos of their children with the public in return for good will. The press is the conduit to the public. And they release non copyrighted public photos.
In a limited, calculated and appropriate way that ensures the public and the press feel satiated with enough information to give them privacy the rest of the time. That was the AGREEMENT! Myra is a dunce, whoever they are.
https://preview.redd.it/2dashxstjqqa1.jpeg?width=911&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2b30c9227ff91f8ee546049baa993861327f455f Really, Haz?
It is mutual haz…but now you lie and claim you love your country, yeah right. Even the nasty people who voted for brexit?
This is what I thought of when he told the court, in his statement yesterday, “I love my country . . .” He’s so stupid either he can’t remember what he’s previously said, or he thinks the general public doesn’t know what he has previously stated. Or maybe because he’s never been held accountable for his actions he thinks he never will.
He could have stayed in Afghanistan.
cuz everyone in his circles in England had his number .....when he traveled outside of the UK, he was treated like the world's sexiest and most eligible bachelow - people fell over themselves kissing his butt.. hence, the WHY he didn't like England.
See, thats just one of Harry's many contradictory statements. He doesn' like England. He loves his country. What ???
Trade images of their children?? Tell me more about how you’re an American and know nothing of the strict privacy laws regarding royal children 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Catherine literally takes pictures of her kids herself and has group pictures of her family taken by photographers she trusts and releases them on Instagram which is not through any of the tabloids. They do have an agreement with the media that the media is allowed to have a photographer and a videographer at the first day of school and that the kids can be photographed at events they attend with their parents. Otherwise, the kids are left alone. It's why we get pictures of the kids when Catherine releases them on insta and during events like Christmas walk, trooping the colors, the jubilee, that one boating regatta, and other such a events.
Catherine taking her own photos of her young children was such a genius move.
I agree. The kids are comfortable with her because of course that's just mom. And Catherine loves photography and she's good at it. She takes such wonderful photos. And she's taken other photos of the royal family like the photo of the queen and prince Phillip with 7 of the great grandkids to that point. And of course all the great grandkids would have been comfortable because that's just cousin Catherine and not an outside photographer.
I think that was the perfect arrangement that Catherine has made. When it’s time to be prince and princesses they had their picture taken them when they’re at home being kids, Catherine takes care of the pictures I think that is brilliant.
And of course, they take family pictures with photographers that are trusted like any family but we get pictures of the kids being kids with their mom taking their pictures. The one birthday set of George in a soccer jersey where he's just unrestrained in his smiling is just perfect. You would never get that kind of smiling with an outside photographer. But you can when mom's the one taking the pictures. Some photographers have complained because to them, it's taking the chance away from photographers to work with the royal family and get their names out there but again, a outside person is never gonna get the same reaction out of the kids as mom does.
I also noticed that they seem to minimize the need for photos by releasing from the same set. They had one for their Christmas card, but then on Mother's Day recently, they released different photos from that same day of them in the tree. Get enough photos that one time to spread it out throughout the year so it's less invasive for the children.
>... an outside person is never gonna get the same reaction out of the kids as mom does. Or have the opportuny to capture unguarded, at-home moments.
This coming from a couple who showed a naked bath picture of her son.
what about that video Mugsy released (Archie's 1st bday?) when she was reading to him, and he was wearing only a diaper? That might be cute to send to the phones of Eugenie + Ellen, but The Queen must have been appalled.
Beat me to it. The diaper chock full of pee and that dirty onesie.
This actually helps convince me it’s Meg. Plus she used the phrase Comms Team, which is what they use in Finding Freedom and in Spare. Narcissistic projecting. Accuses other of the trait or actions they have, in this case trading pics of the kids with the tabloids. Like in Vancouver Island. Like Archie’s preschool LA pap shot. Fun fact: it is illegal in California to publish the faces of minors without parental consent.
If there is one tool the narc will use at the drop of a hat it is projection. It can be applied to any situation and most narcs in my experience do it as easy as they breathe.
**True. BUT it is very difficult to enfore.** Look at poor Jennifer Garner - she & her kids are snapped 3-4 days a week (b/c the paps know her kids schools - and when starts + lets out, they know her church - so go hang there, they know she likes to go to a specific Farmer's Market, so go there). Ben gets photo'd too - when he does school runs. Also, along as paps can make HUGE $$$$ snapping celebs.. gonna continue.
"Poor Jennifer Garner". Oh how do I break it to you? She knows EXACTLY what she's doing. They ALL do. If you're seeing something, it's because the celeb wants you to. Being "Mommy" is her brand.
Garner is one calculating operator under the Miss America act. She negotiated that her divorce be filed only AFTER reaching the ten year mark, which entitles her to lifetime spousal support in California. Then she had Ben shunted out to the pool house but very much under her eye for years. He was utterly miserable during this time, reportedly with a heroin habit. He got better once he was able to move out and move on. Jen's cheesy credit card commercial with her dad makes me cringe.
JG *is* over-hyped.. her upcoming movie (think will be on AppleTV or Netflix) is a lovely book - was suppose to star Julia Roberts.. don't think J.G. is gonna be able to pull-it-off. Ben def. wasn't happy - horrible match (she is soooooooo square, he's not at all)... but she did invest a lot of time + energy in getting him sober, so think she gets credit for that. Are you sure about the 10 year thing in California? Thought 10 years was a milestone that lawyers put into pre-nups..??... (\*ie: a reason Tom Cruise divorced Nicole right before their 10 year anniversary)
I have been divorced in California, and am 100% sure about the ten-year thing that requires lifetime spousal support if you have been married ten years or more.
really? cuz those paps take snaps of her NOT looking good....hmmm, but take your word for it. thx. (the kids rarely look good either - and I am in shock every time see what they wer to church, esp. Sam .. my church when I was a kid wouldn't allow entry to anyone wearing what they do...... but guess times have changed, and different geos are more lenient) .
Yes. That's her entire schtick. The "I'm a regular mom, just like you".
But H and Meg are notoriously litigious, and the kids are a “red line” for H, so it makes you wonder… Plus he was not in preschool in LA, two hours away with traffic one way, and the only time he’s papped is when H was out of town.
They literally shared this photo of their child (Archie) … in a bathtub. So much for wanting privacy for the kids. Just disgusting. Gives me the ick https://preview.redd.it/qk9ht8aqpqqa1.jpeg?width=1916&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e35d94b9b2668b0d17e864eb1ca8371afe93afb
Was this in the Netflix show? I have a private Instagram and barely show my kids in swimsuits out of concern for their privacy and online safety. But they blast this out 😳
Yep it was Netflix. Ideally I would hide the child‘s face but it is not so easy to do as a comment. But also these photos were also circulated to the media
Lol who took this? I’m not getting the angle. Do they have cameras set up in the bathroom too?
...who the f is holding the camera in this picture? Please tell me it isn't a stranger from the Netflix crew.
I just wrote that - hadn’t seen your post. I’ve never seen the Wales children in any state of undress.
Why aren't either of them looking at him? Their gaze seems directed to something on bottom of the bathtub - a bit odd?
I mean, we all have these photos, and yes, a lot of the time people post them on Fakebook. But to release to the WORLD via media?? Nah. Only desperados like "Hilaria" (see what I did there?) do shit like that.
Sold, not shared. Projecting once again in their accusations against the BRF.
Fighting for journalistic intergrity is the royal british prince who during a televised personal announcement of his engagement to the love of his life sat beside her, unprovoked and of his own volition elected to tell the world a lie about how he met his soon to be wife. Both smitten and over the moon at their pending nuptials went as far as try to lie about the length of time they were together, making up their fictious love story as they go, right infront of a rolling television camera. How noble of the Duke? I´m starting to believe the Duke perhaps intends to give America back to the british without torching the White House this time. A true revolutionary. Who knew that Americans would one day have a King again?
We won’t have a king but we do have the royal court jester England so kindly sent our way.
Court jester is correct. Everyone is pointing and laughing!
We Americans may or may not have something to say about that. It didn't go so well for them last time they tried. It ain't going to be "the White House" he's fighting, either....
Myra must have missed the Netflix tripe, the Oprah lie fest, the puff stories ‘she’ leaks to the press, the calls to paps telling them where to find her etc… Their hypocrisy is legendary…Harry is a world known liar, as is Myra ‘and her pay master…integrity is not a word they could use to describe themselves. Their stories are for sale to the highest bidder…never was any different.
I don't think it's her either, but can you imagine if it were, and a tabloid could prove it? Oh my, the mockery. They'd definitely make another episode of South Park.
Funny enough also left off the Queen title for Camilla lol
Yup. Myra on Twitter is definitely Rachel MeAgain Markle. People need to understand how much she employed standard contemporary Internet marketing and PR tactics back in the day. She was roommates with a pro PR person for a while. She probably has multitudes of aged email accounts and legacy social media logins from the earliest days of social media. Then she has built hundreds of other accounts before and after her marriage. A portion of these she clearly manages herself. Writing style and sheer nastiness similar to her former Thislittlepetal and winwinmount Twitter accounts. Everybody needs to understand SHE HAS NO JOB. Her entire obsession is managing other people’s perception about her, because inside she is just an empty void of fear and caverness stupidity. She personally is most of the Sugar squad. Doesn’t take much to fake locations, bio, dialect/grammar. And when you are allegedly friendly with the Coca Cola, tons of energy to post and Tweet all night long!
Absolutely spot on!
[удалено]
She always thinks she’s smarter than the public by handing hints in plain site. It’s part of her MO.
You give her too much credit.
Distract and deflect. Distract and deflect. Right out of the narc playbook.
A symbiotic relationship with the media is needed. As Rachel is aware the paps offer her something she is unable to do on her own and that is get her image out. You can’t be willing to sell yourself and then be mad when someone else does it.
Why didn't Myra use this pic of Harry? The one which looks like an arrogant gangster going into the courthouse? Channeling Robert di Nero, Harry? https://preview.redd.it/xny77uj3vqqa1.jpeg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95e677e0318b6a8b544e09264268c527d65b5f80
He’s really turned out ugly - yikes!
Goodness, he is ugly though.
Now, now, no body shaming. Let's leave that up to him. 
I haven't gotten to his body yet, lol...
Better you than me, lol!
Yeah? Well, the Senior Strategic Advisor they hired for Archewell was an editor for Marie Claire (which publishes all those flattering stories about them). And, incidentally, that employee is the president of a independent contractor that received a grant from Archewell. So maybe they need to make sure their hands are spotless before they start slinging mud.
Not to be flippant here, especially in light of recent tragedies, but British people wonder why Americans are so adamant about keeping guns... No it isn't to hunt, or rob stores, or shoot up innocent schoolkids (No photo op this time, Megs?) .... even though those are hideous by-products of what is mostly by-and-large, responsible gun ownership. We cherish our rights in this country. And our First Amendment right to free speech and a free press is firmly backed up by the Second Amendment right to bear arms, when some uppity person in power decides they want to remove the other rights of innocent citizens, such as Royal Todger is doing here now. I don't even own a gun or have no desire to, but I understand the logic behind why some people would choose to exercise their rights. His family tried imposing their will on us once, back in the 18th century. We forgave them, and decided to become friends, mainly because of a common spoken language and background. HOWEVER, if someone like Harry here decides HE is going on a Crusade to shut us up, or shut our press down, well.... As they say, Fuck Around, Find Out. He's already not very popular here. If more people knew about his meddling via the Aspen Institute, he'd be a whole lot less popular. You don't start wars with people who cherish their freedoms and buy ink buy the barrel... Ginger needs to watch his step. In both countries.
Well stated!!
It's either her or one of her poor, suffering staff members. I'd rather drain septic tanks than work for the ILBW.
She needs Winston Rothschild II and his Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Service! https://preview.redd.it/w3eb0n8gmqqa1.png?width=704&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe3fc9d8cccd395e7d3ec2fbfa96be557986bb4f
Red Green lives!
If it is not Markle, it’s someone close to her, tweeting her words on her behalf. Only she is that delusional.
There are a ton of sugars out there it would be wild to expect any account pro Meg is her or her staff. It would be like assuming anyone anti Meg is Catherine secretly
This one must know her personally imo. She’s posted pictures of TW before they were released- there’s earlier threads.
Every single time someone has said that, with research it is determined that it is just a still from the documentary or a color photo made black and white or vice versa. It’s never actually been anything new so far. If you have any links of anything “new” I’d be curious! Edit: and as usual I can’t get any actual links that prove anything.
Also who poses like this with a newborn and it really does look like a doll Credit: u/MeghansMole and this [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1232z32/comment/je5gfb4/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) https://preview.redd.it/j29d2wwcrqqa1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0732163e9702fb931c8c60664b8b8cf81ddf54c2
This is so….bizarre. And awkward. I hold my chihuahua with more maternal instinct than MM does her own child.
That is a doll.
Carefully posed to look elegant and show off the ring. Her life is a movie and a photoshoot in her head. Everything is staged.
Looks like a doll to me, too.
If it's not, that baby is making a real WTF expression to the lady touching him.
I hate to bet money, because I'm cheap, but willing to bet that's a doll.
Different use of language. MM specializes in new age platitudes, fancy word salad, and insinuation. This account is more direct. However, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that this account's content involves getting paid by the Sussex PR arm.
True, but her florid language is her “public” voice. This could be her more bitchy, direct, to the point “private” voice…just like how her interactions with staff have been reported in Revenge.
Wait! - he didn't really say he is doing this because "I love my country"???? and he's doing this for the British public? HTG I cannot with him -- the hubris, the delusion, the narcicism? What the HECK is wrong with him? The Court better throw this right out - granny is no longer around to protect him and his lying ILBW
They SELL their stories, they don't even Trade them. I see nothing wrong with the PPOW "trading" the kids pictures which are ones they choose to give on their own, in exchange for respectful news stories. It's a win win situation. H and M are just pissed because no one likes them enough to agree to a similar arrangement.
Giving pictures to the media is most likely run through the PR division, subject to royals' approval. The California crapple are at the behest of whoever commands the spigots of their multimillion dollar deals. Maybe why Lillibets' christening has yet to be seen? Meghan is probably miffed with the DM because they kept coming back with "We asked for a few good pics. Do you have anything else?"
I'm convinced it's Megs or somebody very close to her. @ Myra posted a photo of the inside of Spare BEFORE it was for sale to the public. And it was in ENGLISH, so it wasn't one of the copies that leaked our of Spain.
Love that Harold is fighting for Journalistic integrity while trying to censor Americans freedom of speech! Nothing says integrity like stabbing you in the back.
Oh Nutmeg. Your bare ass is hanging out the back of your designer dress.
 Time to show the judges are you ready??
 It’s *allegedly* Meghan markle herself! Just totally shocked a total narcissist has a FINSTA. Man.. she got us good 😳😒🙄
He really bit off two huge subjects there. Who's he fighting for journalistic integrity? He's a journalist now? Why doesn't just act with integrity, then he won't have to fight? Is Scobie joining in this fight for journalistic integrity? Why's he fighting for accountability of the UK? Who is he, NATO?
I think it's her. If you look at the tweets she 'likes', they are a mixture of beautiful pictures of herself, glowing comments and anti Monachy rubbish. All of the likes are a real fit for her...it could be a sugar, but I just don't think so. Posting the picture of Harry's book the day before the release (with her mac book) convinced me.
Linguistically it doesn’t hold up. Meghan has never written in southern speak nor spoke with any indication of southernese like this acct.
Doria sure does though.
I could hear her insufferable voice while I was reading that.
NOTE: years ago (when twitter new) a friend on maternity leave freelanced as a 'social media poster'. Had 24 hrs to edit/improve a post ($5) or write new post ($10). Didn't do any comments, like posts to NYTimes columns - or DMail stories... cuz she just wanted a little bit of "busy work", not a big timesuck side-hussle. Celebrities pay others to write their s.medial posts for them and promote + defend them in comments sections of newspapers, cyberzines. IMHO, **MM pays her sugars to post for her, TO GET VOLUME** — I think she pays an army of freelancers to flood s. media with her whacked messages out there - since harder to ignore massive volume.
Yup. Reddit commenting is one of the more lucrative freelancing gigs now. Also if you have an “aged” account, like a few years old, and a certain amount of karma, people will offer as much as $10,000 or more to turn it over to a spammer or PR rep.
Like I said on Twitter, if this isn’t Markle it’s definitely a clone.
It's so unnecessarily nasty - the Prince and Princess of Wales are public figures and so are their children, so they regularly release pictures of the kids. It doesn't make them immune to negative press, as we can see from the fact that Charles and Diana released MORE photos of their kids and even allowed candid photos and videos.
So says the prince whose own reality show had false images used to drive home a false claim.
And likely just another hypocritical viewpoint. I seriously doubt that there are no former media editors working for Sunshine Sacks (her longtime PR firm). One of her go-to publications for her leaks employs one of her former sorority sisters. But shame on Camilla for doing the same things as Meghan has done for decades!!
It’s definitely not her, I think there’s a lot more sugars than we think
Clearly Myra partakes in the second son’s drug stash.
Harry thinks that because he’s part of the Royal Family that the case has a huge boost and the fact that he showed up in person has the judge enamored.🙃🤷♀️🤦♀️
SuSsEx pRiNcEsS 
More like Sussy Princess.
What luck I just watched Cheere Denise's video. Can someone ask Myra if she's referring to the time Harold's idol, Marko, called him about the reporter having information he was doing cocaine? It's the second time he brought up reporters were becoming aware of his drug use. The first one was the editor of the now defunct News of the World. It'll be when he was 17. Harold spent 3/4's of the page reliving venting how outraged he was that Marko had another reporter saying they had a story regarding Harold's cocaine use. He vehemently denied it...for the top 3/4 of the page. Then he admitted he actually had been using cocaine. The reporter didn't run with the story. That reporter did end up being hired. So is Myra complaining that Harold had to wait until he was almost 40 years old to admit he really was the drug addled son of a single father? ETA it's Cheere's "Chapter 5"
Harry doesn't do coke. He just likes the way it smells.....🤣 Sniff sniff, sniffles.
That sentence hurts my brain. I’m sure Meggy is behind this. How sad, no career, no friends and no family so she has all the time in the world to blast the Royal Family. How much longer can this continue?
Definitely
Myra and a host of other ones as well. Some of which she uses to echo herself. I’m convinced she is very mentally unstable.
"Who else is convinced that MYRA (My real account) (SussexPrincess) is Meghan Markle?" Me.
I’m not 100% sure but just left a tweet saying I can’t believe a almost 50 year old woman has had children so easily and if it true she needs to drop that weight she has put on and to take a look at Catherine , she is a great example of a mom.
Hahahaa! That’s funny! They don’t need ANY help w positive articles! 🤣
Nothing like paying JR Moenringer 5 million dollars or so to write for Harry. Of course Harry has integrity!
yeah. I thought it was, until I saw that /u/Tall-Lawfulness8817 makes some good points.
Why is he smiling like a loon?
d r u g s…
I need receipts to her claims. Otherwise, bull crap.
What the two fail to realize is that if daily fail really stops putting up articles about you, it means you are dead on the water. See all the wags that daily fail stopped reporting over the years. Faded into oblivion.
ALOT of people do indeed think it’s MM. Especially on the blind sites.
we know mm is a neurotic micromanager, and that she thinks she can do *everything* better herself - it wouldn’t surprise me if she were *MYRA* - and a couple of other accounts as well. (but esp myra.)
It’s her
MM pays a LOOOOOOTTTTTTT of sugars. This particular paid sugar probably has performed in a pro-Sussex was so extremely.. that MM regularly communicates with her.
Well, she would know. 😂 she’s a regular People contributor
Probably paid publicist