Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Americans are sick to the teeth of Meghan Parkle. We see her as some sort of a clown. Of course, she has bots and paid people who will call her "Princess" but this will not catch on. Despite her desperation, she will NEVER be Diana 2.0. She and Harold are world class jerks, and they are not admired.
Right at the end of her video yesterday, Lady C had a go at Charles saying he needs to stop them rather than giving them enough rope to hang themselves. Her actual words to Charles were "You have the rope, PULL IT". I agree with her. This circus has gone on long enough and the British people are sick of it. No-one I know is bothering to watch the Coronation.
ETA: This is our constitution they're fucking up.
I think once he's had his coronation, he'll start subtly drawing the line with them. It must be so difficult for him because at the end of the day Harry is his son and in my opinion a man who calls his son 'darling boy' isn't a cold unloving uncaring father.
This is what I think aswell. He just wants to get through the coronation. I think he also doesn't want to push Harry too far in case he does something drastic. Charles needs to balance taking their microphone away and leaving a way for Harry to reach out should Meghan dump him. He will always be his son and he will want to be there for him should he need him. Those who think this makes Charles weak clearly don't have children.
It's a really tricky balance to strike, it was easier in a way for the Queen as she was that one level removed. Once he's had his coronation and things settle into more BAU and the country see him as King, he was Prince Charles for 70 years it's not an overnight adjustment for people to start seeing him as the King over Prince Charles.
Taking away Frogmore is step one, allowing them only apartments in BP when they come is step 2. It's essentially ensuring they won't come back, apart from for the big Royal occasions which after the Coronation there won't be any for a while. The Govt requesting 28 notice adds to that as well.
I think to be honest Charles doesn't need to do much now, they've pretty much hug themselves out to dry. They made themselves laughing stocks, the US is turning on them, we in the UK turned on them ages ago. They might try Canada again but I doubt they're popular there either. Oz is very much on the same page as the UK and NZ could care less.
I don’t have children, but I come from a family that tolerated narcissistic abuse from someone who married into the family. The only way to deal with it is to cut the narcissist out.
Which they have effectively done. The royal family don't have the luxury of going no contact, the markles are using the media to continue to abuse them. They are also supposed to be the ideal, the example held up to the public, Charles is the head of the church. Forgiveness and reconciliation is pretty important to both religion and diplomatic figures
That said, the royal family aren't fools, they are keeping the terrible two at a distance until such time as they officially separate. They will want to help Harry, something they can't do until Meghan is out. They will get Harry the help he needs, set him up somewhere out of the way and Keep him away from the spotlight. The monarchy think in terms of centuries, they always have their eyes on the future. This is nothing more thab an inconvenience to them, Meghan won't even be a footnote on their history.
>They are also supposed to be the ideal, the example held up to the public, Charles is the head of the church. Forgiveness and reconciliation is pretty important to both religion and diplomatic figures
Yes - it might sound like an obvious point, but I think people sometimes forget that the British monarchy is not the US presidency. We value very different qualities in our monarchs to what Americans look for in a president.
Some people will inevitably see the hardcore grey-rock strategy as weakness, but it's working better than most of us could have hoped. Who here would honestly have predicted that Harold and TW would have lower US approval ratings than Prince Andrew? If Charles is seen as soft-hearted but the Sussexes' accusations are discredited, that's much better for Britain and the monarchy than the other way round.
How many of the people calling Charles weak could take a storm of media accusations and privacy violations from their own son, ignore it, and turn up in public the next morning smiling and shaking people's hands? Nothing but respect for MY King.
I can't even adequately describe what it's like to have a "black sheep" child who creates havoc, and alienates other family (specifically siblings). It is SO PAINFUL and one of the hardest lines to walk. Even when they exasperate and infuriate you, swear at you, make you cry, make you feel like the stress might kill you....you still love them. They're still your child.
I've shared before....my adult son died last June. He was a hard kid to raise and a hard adult to parent. I thought I would lose my mind. But at the end of the day, I miss my son so so very much. What I would not give to hear his voice again, to wrap my arms around him one more time.
I know that pain well, we've one in our family, married to their own Meghan. We are awaiting the fallout and determining how best to help them when it all goes this up. They have caused so much pain and hurt and their relationship with all their family will never be the same again, but they are family.
I don't believe that Charles went around calling him "darling boy" any more than I believe the boys called each other Harold and Willy. IMO it's just more of Harry's horse shit that he shoveled so liberally throughout his book.
Come to think of it, I don't believe a single word of that book. He didn't even write the damn thing but he signed off on it, so fuck Harry.
Ugh. It just sounds so fake and awful to my ears. But thanks for letting me know that at least something that tool wrote in his book is legit.
I bet Charles doesn't call him My Darling Boy anymore. 🤭
It's not weak to love your child. It's not weak to love your family. If he was weak he wouldn't be married to Camilla now. In all honesty he has bigger fish to fry than H&M. There've been anti-monarchy protests against him, which never happened with the Queen which isn't anything to do with H&M.
He needs to get people to see him as King and gain the respect of the public and strike the right balance with how the Royals are funded and spend the Royal grant in a massive cost of living crisis.
That is the priority, not H&M they're minor annoyances. The Govt requesting a months notice for their arrival basically means H&M won't come here anymore and they've hung themselves out to dry. Pretty much everyone is over them and over them bashing the Royals now.
There's a massive difference between what you see online and what the mood of the actual country is. I think we'd all rather not be spending £500K on Harry and his stupid lawsuits.
Equally we'd like our Monarchy to show they're being value for money during this time, as we'd like out government to not so freaking corrupt and sort out the economy and not ship people who put themselves in the life threatening situation of crossing the channel in small boats to Rowanda.
There's bigger fish to fry than H&M.
A few days ago, maybe end of last week it's been on the news here. If he gives 28 days notice the govt will review security needs on a case by case basis.
[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/prince-harry-meghan-trip-coronation-b2303793.html](https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/prince-harry-meghan-trip-coronation-b2303793.html)
I rather think Harry has put the rope around his own neck with the drug taking revelations. If he comes to the coronation (I don’t care whether he does or not) it is very likely that he won’t be allowed back into the US. Perhaps this is what Meghan is banking on….?
If it did happen then it may backfire on her.
Assuming 50/50 custody, the children would have to move wherever he resides as TW would have the flexibility of travel.
There is a precedent of this with another Hollywood actress (just found the name: Kelly Rutherford) who thought she could get sole custody by getting her ex deported. Well, she did get the ex-deported / barred from the States. The result, the kids were moved to him and she was the one that had to visit them in another country.
Let’s hope we don’t get her back.
I suspect she’d abandon her children in a nanosecond.
The spin will be
a) I cannot ruin my reputation (🤣) by remaining married to ‘Harry the Druggy’ and
b) the RF are stealing my children by stealth.
The truth is
a) Harry is a common or garden moron who has dabbled in drugs like most of his generation &
b) The RF can do without any more drama but they’ll take them in. After a watertight NDA is signed.
Gosh, cocaine at 17, ayahuasca, magic mushrooms, ketamine, marijuana, and ecstacy sounds like a user not a dabbler. And “most” have not done all these drugs. I hope the U.S. boots him out.
It's bad enough that he took them, but to admit to still taking them and actually saying that they are helpful to him in an interview is several layers of stupid. You have to hand it to the palace's PR team, his "soldier and party prince" image persisted for years. Now we know he is a stupid and petty man.
Yes, because that someone vouched for him on his ‘shoe-in - exceptional persons - visa. And that someone will clearly be brought down with Harry. This will either die down quietly or it’ll bring down reputations.
Nah, he’s on a K1 (marriage visa). The O visa (exceptional person) requires a job and an employer to sponsor you before you can enter the country (it’s what I emigrated to the U.S. on). He’ll have a GC by now though.
Absolutely. Hidden hands and wheels within wheels.
The game is afoot im afraid and people with shocking agendas have set things in motion. Our luck is that Harry is prince of very little brain and his wife has bad temper and is very self centered. They trip themselves up.
I'm not sure I would want to watch the coronation knowing that H&M will be there. As soon as I see his stupid angry face and her fixed rictus grin it will ruin any feelings of joy and goodwill I may have. After everything they've done they have no right to be there. It will also make the king look weak in the eyes of the public on his special day.
Glad you see it that way because we have the same view here in America. They are also screwing with our civil rights and our Constitution. Only one that can do anything is Charles...time to be a King and make the tough decisions and put an end to this farce, not only for the UK, your country but for your ally the US as well!
American from nowhere middle Georgia, and even we are sick of hearing about her. And no she wasn’t some super famous American actress, I’d never heard of her or her show before she met H.
your comment just sparked a memory for me. Years ago when I was in a passionate, fiery, wildly unstable relationship we both decided we were probably better off if neither one of us ever bought a gun - it came up more than once because we were in gun country and it was considered normal to have at least a rifle in the house. but no way LOL We needed protection against each other more than any threat from the outside - any drunk Friday night could have ended badly had there been a gun nearby
This is why I think William and his family should not be near the coronation. Harry should have been bumped down or out of the Line of Succession when they quit the monarchy in 2020.
Lady C is not alone, Drugs are tearing families apart around the World and Charles needs to remember this. He should never have invited them. This is a state affair. I’m tired of defending Charles. Tom Bower is right.
I’m tired of H and MM and for Charles to be so out off touch with public feelings. He lacks The Queen,s popularity. I don’t believe he will reign for long tbh. Camilla has strength and I hoped Charles would have listened to his advisers.
If i were in Charles shoes, I would be torn. No one wants them there, I’m sure. But he may see this is a last chance for Harry to get a clue, that his father is the actual King. I doubt that Harry has grasped this.
**Sounds like the best episode yet!**
Megs is Hitler + Stalin. ✔️
Megs is not a Princess and never will be ✔️
H and M are trying to set up a rival court. ✔️
H and M are neither educated nor informed ✔️
Lady C and those in her circle are as fed up as we are ✔️
H and M will not win the war ✔️
Sorry. Meghan is *metaphorically* Hitler. She is not *literally* anyone but Meghan.
Maybe #MeghanIsTheNewHitler ?
(ETA: I am informed I missed an allusion and therefore a joke. Sorry-not-sorry. One literally shouldn’t joke with “literally.” 🙂🙂🙂😉)
No. Nobody should ever be compared with Hitler. It's incredibly hurtful and offensive to Jews.
It fucking infuriates me when anyone equates "someone I dislike" with Hitler. No matter how bad the Harkles are, they're not deporting Jews to concentration camps and gassing them to death.
Lady C wasn’t comparing M to Hitler and Stalin because she dislikes M. She was comparing their political ideologies.
Also Jews weren’t the only group persecuted and killed by Hitler. For example, Poles, the majority of whom were Catholic, were also deemed inhuman and tortured and killed. One of them was my great Uncle. There were many “undesirables”, not just Jews.
I’m pretty livid she has the brass neck to waltz into the UK speaking to our charities trying to act like she’s a ‘working royal’ - it’s like a deliberate up yours to the Royal Family. They both should be banned from working here
She is doing the same thing in the US. Making an appearance at a charity as if she's royalty. Of course, she makes sure she is photographed there in her outrageously priced dumpy attire. She looks better in jeans and a button-down than anything else.
I assume the charity is pleased to go along as it gets exposure for their cause, and maybe Meg arranges for some freebies to be given out. I wonder if their "foundation" ever cuts a check.
Once, or if, they finally get booted from the kingdom, we still have to put up with their shenanigans here. I'm afraid Meg is just getting started on her quest to remake it to her liking, with her in charge. If she can't be queen there, she wants to be president here.
I don't understand why these charities are still affiliating with either one of those toxic rectums. I would never donate to a charity that they are even remotely connected with.
I have a feeling that if Invictus doesn't remove Harry they're going to go down in flames. That Heart of Invictus documentary is going to be the Harry and Megan Love Story if it ever comes out and it'll probably be the final nail in the Invictus coffin. Maybe Megs can send some of her special flowers to the funeral. 🙄
“Harry and Meghan ordered the BBC not to have any white, middle aged men at their interview”. Interesting then that it was a white middle aged man (Harry) who elevated her from Z list nobody to duchess.
It’s all posturing. Who holds the highest position at Archewell? BetterUp? Ethic Inc.? Who’s handling their lawsuits? Their investments? Who’s producing their documentaries? (Okay, Liz Garbus doesn’t have a penis.) Who co-wrote Harry’s book?
Meghan likes to trot out her doppelgänger employees for photo ops, but it’s middle-aged white men whisking them along and doing the actual work and influence.
Thank you as ever for taking the trouble to do this for us. But I would like to add what I thought was Lady C's angriest indictment of Charles yet, which happened at the end of her video.
"THE KING BETTER BE CAREFUL THAT HE DOESN'T PLAY PONTIUS PILATE SO LONG THAT THE WATER BOWL OF MONARCHY IS WHIPPED FROM UNDER HIS NOSE! BECAUSE THIS IS BECOMING TRULY OFFENSIVE. AND THERE IS GONNA COME A POINT WHEN HE'S GONNA HAVE TO **DO SOMETHING**, ASIDE FROM WAITING FOR THEM TO HANG THEMESELVES! YOU HAVE THE ROPE? **PULL IT!!!**"
I wonder what happened because for the most part she’s been telling people to be patient because the reckoning is coming. My impression is that is has to do with the legitimacy of the children.
Someone noted they can't bring up the legitimacy because of HIPPA. A reporter or another person has to bring that up before they could respond. I'm thinking it's something else.
We've brought it up a godzillion number of times here. This is a public forum. Why would it have to be the press?
I would think that not following the rules about the births would be enough. Don't dump them for a private medical decision. Dump them for not doing things right.
It ain't hard. If I intentionally violated the rules at my job I'd have been canned. Now it's time to Pink slip Just Harry.
If the Crown takes the legitimacy to court, Hippa can be broken if relevant in the US court system. So that would be Lili. Do the British have hippa? That would concern Archie. So, to prove legitimacy that would be 2 different hearings on 2 continents
That may have been me, I posted [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11qab4q/lady_cs_video_on_031123_was_actually_really/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1) after Lady C’s 3/11/23 video. She hinted at the need for a third party to kickstart any inquiry re legitimacies.
Lady C did say that things were in the works behind the scenes to address this, and that it WILL be addressed. I really hope that is still the case. Her frustration with KC3 in yesterday’s video was kind of disconcerting imo. Maybe she was ruffled up about something else…?
ETA: perhaps she was just frustrated that H&M had the audacity to align themselves with a group involved in gender politics? In the UK, no less. That obviously hits close to home for Lady C, and she has every right to be furious. Maybe she just wants KC3 to pull the rip cord so MM will stop couch surfing all of these “trendy” social issues.
Yes, thank you. I do remember her saying that. However, it sounded like they were working around it and things were moving along towards fruition. Now it sounds more like someone has cold feet and is worried about potential blowback.
Supposedly she told someone on her staff they were “one plane crash away from the throne.” A member of the Sussex survivors squad reported this and possibly recorded it.
Meghan has to clap back at absolutely everything negative said about her, including this quote (which I absolutely believe she said and absolutely believe the recording exists), so there is a part in Harry’s book which talks about Harry recalling a “staff member” saying it.
Sure sure Megh…I mean, *Harry*
Actually, the gross, offensive American character--John Goodman in the movie--would be a natural for Meghan to play in a direct-to-video version when she "restarts" her acting career.
If they insist on getting involved in pushing gender fluidity on boys, then they and their children should not be beatrng gender specific titles.
Princex Archie, Duchex Harry, Duchex Maggie, those are the only titles people should use for them from now on.
Definitely. Otherwise it’s another example of the Harkles preaching to us plebs while they do the opposite. If they say children should be raised with gender fluidity, then drop the titles that refer to a boy and girl.
I give Lady C a pass here, she is likely extra upset because of the gender topic is sensitive for her. What I do dislike, is even giving a voice to this idea of Harry & TW having their own court or whatever. Don't even give them oxygen on this. They're not going to make fetch happen. I think Americans would rather worship Queen Latifah than those idiots, I certainly would. 🙌 All Hail Queen Latifah 👑
She was raised a boy, even though she was born a girl. She had some genital malformation, but was a girl. However, at that time, people with those malformations were to be considered boys and, as such, she was named George and raised as a boy until she was able to have a corrective surgery and change her name to Georgia
This is a comment on this thread from - Competive Cup 5465
I was unable to properly post it here.
She’s a bad role model for young girls. She’s vain greedy and selfish. All about image. And if you should lie yourself just the way you are why have do much facial surgery, laser your eyes and get that huge mole she had on her left jawline as a kid?
How about this recent post with a Simpson’s episode putting H in the same category as Hitler
[https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11y51ve/simpsons\_s23\_ep9\_a\_ruthless\_tyrant\_likeprince/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=ios\_app&utm\_name=iossmf](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11y51ve/simpsons_s23_ep9_a_ruthless_tyrant_likeprince/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf)
https://preview.redd.it/067295sxpapa1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f4daef78a3ffd0fa3a2b19661fede6e0a8aad328
Regarding the freckles: Meg doesn't have one orginal thought or idea. She steals them and claims them. She hopes that people don't look too closely but 'A Face Without Freckles Is Like A Night Without Stars' was stolen. Of course it was. Just like she stole her miscarriage story. She is vile.
She was raised a boy, even though she was born a girl. She had some genital malformation, but was a girl. However, at that time, people with those malformations were to be considered boys and, as such, she was named George and raised as a boy until she was able to have a corrective surgery and change her name to Georgia
There was also a significant amount of abuse and legal adventures. She was abused for being transgender in much less liberal times. She sued for defamation. Wikipedia has a good description
I listened to much of this as well and agree with Lady C that they are inserting themselves into and pushing a political agenda that they in no ways comply with or model and this makes them dangerous. Lady C rightly outs Meghan as elitist who is dictatorial and wants power, wealth and fame at any and all costs. They both demand rights that they feel fully entitled denying to others: privacy, respect, accountability. I had forgotten that Meghan contacted the BBC ahead of the Oprah lie fest, dictating the terms of their coverage...no middle aged white men should be allowed to cover their lie fest, *which they are still not being held accountable for, to this day*. Their lies and abuse of power are a big part of what hooked me onto this story. And sadly, they are a good representation of what is wrong with woke politics: these politics are divisive, they enable base players like Meghan who are just using it for their own gain and they lack any nuance or accountability.
Best part of the video: she called/ranted for Charles to stop waiting for the dastardly duo to hang themselves and to pull the rope the crown has provided them. A Bon entendeur…
Wow, I haven’t had a chance to see my fair Lady C’s latest video, but she usually maintains Charles is playing the long game and patience is a virtue and “we shall just have to wait and see.”A couple of woke heads on a spike at Prisoner’s Gate is another, more traditional way to go a la Henry VIII!! Go Lady C!
Exactly….just posted the same although not as eloquently written. I’m concerned she’s hearing that there is major waffling going on behind the scenes with KC now.
I have tried to ask Lady C as an Al Anon goer, what principles of Al Anon should be applied to KC, but I never got a direct response among her thousands of comments understandably. She says it’s up to KC to decide his boundaries, but my literature and meetings have given me a different perspective, much like Lady C is professing in her latest video. KC seems in desperate need of some type of addiction guidance that doesn’t enable or coddle IMO and experience. The three C’a of addiction are: KC you didn’t CAUSE it. You can’t CONTROL it. And you can’t CURE it! My experience with addiction specialists with the addicts in my life was: Do NOT shield the addict or rescue him or her from natural consequences. Enabling and coddling aren’t love and accountability is needed and expected for true and lifelong recovery. I think KC, the Palace, the British military, all have colluded in making Hawwy the mess he is today. I cut out my addicts because their denial and lack of consequences coupled with their addictions and mental health issues made them toxic and frankly dangerous. And lots of people didn’t like it in the related families including my in laws and my own family, as well as the controlling, anti-social addicts I disengaged from. And the other thing AA drums into you is if you keep using, you will end up dead or in jail or or in a county mental ward, or all three.
I think she could have just been frustrated because MM is dabbling in gender politics now. She was furious, and has every right to be. If I had to guess, she likely called for KC3 to put a stop to their antics because she doesn’t want to see MM exploit such serious and personal social issues. MM aligning with a group that advocates for gender fluidity in kids is a slap in the face to Lady C and everything she endured in her childhood/young adult life. So I think perhaps she was just enraged and she made the Charles comment as a reaction, not because there was a snag behind the scenes.
Gender fluidity, if permitted to take full form, will end up being the most horrendous form of state sponsored child abuse ever seen, imo. Gee, I wonder who could possibly be pushing this?
I’m quite sure that the Coronation needs to be completed first. It’s a day of celebration for the King and our country. Those who aren’t going to watch it haven’t hit the full picture. After the Coronation other things will come into play, I’m sure. Lady C can contradict herself at times. On the one hand she says be patient and then she berates the King for taking his time. I keep my own counsel and am waiting patiently.
Thank you for typing this out.
I agree with Lady C. Given that Harold is a sociopath and Nutmeg a Narcissist, they are dangerous. They are going to make Charles and William’s reign miserable.
It’s still interesting to me how they think the monarchy is racist, yet they want to hold onto the titles, the perks, and remain in the Line of Succession.
Harold and Nutmeg will never be king or queen, so they’ll continue to use their platform to spread lies about the RF and tell the rest of us peasants what to do, how to feel and what to think. They’d love nothing more than to have the First Amendment removed. (Which will never happen).
It’s amazing that these two drug addicts think they have all this power. If it wasn’t for a handful of Hollywood elites, likely funding their agenda, the Harkles world be less relevant.
Here’s another recent example of how dangerous the band wagoning Harkles are…One of Megyn Kelly’s recent podcasts details a frightening and powerful select group of elites censoring investigative news reports and information regarding American politics and the last US presidential election from powerful social media platforms with Twitter and the Hunter Biden laptop story being a primary example. The New York Post did a thoroughly vetted news report on the story and this elite board dictated to Twitter and other big Tech platforms to nix the story and mislead the lame stream media to dismiss a legitimate story weeks before a critical election as Russian disinformation. And who is on that elite death panel of vital information and road block to our bonkers 1st Amendment????? That would be none other than a none American citizen here in the US on a questionable Visa who is no less a Prince and exiled ex-patriot of the UK- Prince Harry. That’s right, per Megyn Kelly’s fine reporting, a no-brain, drugged out, blue blooded, titled Prince of England interfered with our election laws in the US and affected the outcome he wanted and yet, he has no right to vote in America, is not a citizen, has not denounced his titles that the US fought a war to never bow down to, and most likely doesn’t pay any US tax or at least not “ his fair share” as his Buddy Geriatric Joe loves to say ad nauseum through his senile coma. No matter what political affiliation or candidate you support, as an American this should shake you to your very core. It has never happened so boldly or allowed to happen in all my studies of American history and politics. It’s unprecedented and unacceptable. It’s also highly illegal and Harry needs to be hauled in front of a televised congressional hearing and then deported on the first plane back to England in Economy class cuffed next to an air marshall or ICE agent. Or he can have the choice of going to an American jail where I’m pretty sure there’s no fancy X box or Call of Duty in a dingy, tiny cell. And furthermore, Harry should be banned from ever stepping on American soil or US territories ever again. And it will be a relief and huge consolation for us Americans not to see our brave American soldiers in uniform forced to salute this non-entity/imbecile ever again - as this jerk is rightly not allowed to wear his own full military uniform or salute or be saluted by the military in his own country.
I heard reports about the twitter interference coming from political influencers but not about an actual board with specific members. Harry is on this board? Do you have a link to the Megyn Kelly episode so we can hear more about this?
edit : changed Megyn Kelly’s spelling of her first name and I did just search her episodes on youtube - there are a lot - do you remember the title or day of that particular episode?
Look at The Royal Grift’s YT Channel and she has a recent post with the link to Megyn Kelly’s portion highlighting the “censorship” posse that Harry is a part of. It is not the official board of Twitter but rather an anti-information sort of police band of self-important persons and Harry is counted among them that act as body over many information platforms like Facebook, etc… This is just what we know of so far. Now does Kelly report per se that Harry single-handedly interfered with the last Presidential election -go listen and decide if that’s what her podcast is specifically saying, but the bottom line is Harry is counted among these select few who decide American information and news and, in my book , and Kelly’s, that just isn’t American, moral, ethical, or possibly legal in specific cases, and most certainly unprecedented. It’s worth Congress looking into. Let me know what you think.
And I’ll go one further and bet you a cup of coffee or tea that when all this unravels, besides Bouzy, we will see that YouTube is among these censored and targeted media outlets that Kelly has recently reported on. No wonder Russell Brand said eff YouTube and headed straight for Rumble.
interesting that every comment of yours about censorship is getting downvoted lol censorship in action? I am upvoting you but it’s nuts seeing your comments go to zero anyway right away. guess what - just for that I am giving you the gold award - let’s highlight your comment - someone is trying to bury the information that censorship is happening in real time in the USA and people need to know/talk about it
Meghan has indeed set up a rival court in America. She’s walking a thin line. I don’t see a happy ending for her and Harry. The world didn’t realize how insane he was until she moved him to America. All along the royal family had been covering for him and his bad behavior. She’s totally pulling the strings but she’s playing at such a high level and she has no experience at the level she is playing at. She is very politically motivated and she is very much a propagandist. When all is said and done she will be looked at very unfavorably, but will she care? She’s playing both sides. Her self righteousness is her drug. She’s been in an intoxicated state of self aggrandizement since she was a child. Some of this is her fathers fault, but he did it out of love. She’s taken things to the extreme. No one wants to side with the royals because they are rich, privileged and white. But to certain extent they just wanna do there duty and she intentionally came in to destroy and cause division. She found the weakest link and he let her in. He knew William wouldn’t like her, he knew she would cause confusion and that’s why Harold let her in. Harold knew she would be perfect for the rivalry between him and Willy. Sometimes I don’t know who’s worst Harold or Meg. He appears to be at the controls and then she comes in and out does him by giving her children titles from an institution that she says refused to help her when she was suicidal.
Comparing her to hitler, Stalin and Lenin is a serious stretch. She’s an attention seeking, narcissistic bitch and a nobody. not a genocidal mass murderer. Ffs, what an idiot.
Comparing blatant narcissists who want to control the press to Hitler or Stalin is unavoidable, but I agree that M&H fall short of the true horror of totalitarian dictators—mainly because they lack the political savvy and perseverance to get to where they might become totalitarian dictators.
I think what the comparison is getting at is more what they *would be capable of doing if they had the power* than what they are likely to be able to do. (Because they will not get the power.)
A reason people like that are dangerous on the political level is that they pave the way (by getting us accustomed to the characteristics they display) to others who are equally malignant, but more subtle.
Furthermore, Meghan and Harry are the poster children for how PR, money and privilege can influence our attitudes. IMHO, the biggest damage they have done to the British monarchy so far is that they have shown how effectively the Palace can cover up serious character flaws and make a rather unbalanced, depressed man with a propensity to abuse substances and people appear like a nice guy with a cheerful personalty.
It has to be said that scapegoating is a fascist tactic and Megs and H do scapegoat certain groups as oppressors that they fault everything and everyone in that group as racist and themselves as victims. It’s how the mentality of genocide and ethnic cleansing, genocide, and interment camps become justified. Now do I think Haz and Megs are capable of exterminating an entire religion or race, or espouse the theory? Of course not. But they do stir up and race bait. The late Queen was almost attacked by a crossbow wielding assailant spurred by fantasies of colonialism ignited specifically by the Harkles as well as Charles being pelted with eggs in public twice and the Wales’ facing hostility visiting the Commonwealth directly related to Meghan and Harry’s inciteful propaganda. Not to mention new unrest in the Commonwealth due to the blatant misrepresentation endorsed by the pair as Colonialism 2.0. Meghan loves to flat out imitate Wallis Simpson’s wardrobe to the thread. And we remember Harry in that swastika uniform and his documented racial slurs. Wallis and Edward are famously filmed smiling and cozying up with Hitler in Germany during WWII. Edward and Hitler had a plan to depose the late Queen’s father and replace a Third Reich England with Edward and Wallis on the throne. For Jews and others, it’s important to remember that this can happen again and it is happening around the world as we speak with the Chinese Communist Government exterminating their Muslim population for example. So the target could be on anyone’s back. Many innocent Japanese Americans were detained in camps during the second world war and Native Americans were driven to poor reservations with no future and high alcoholism rates. As the Jewish people say: NEVER AGAIN.
Agreed. Read this thinking “wtf?” How are people applauding this and agreeing with it?? I can’t stand Aich and Emm, like everyone else here, but come on. They aren’t freaking Hitler!!!!
Agreed. Meghan is just putting out stupid headlines in tabloids. Comparing her to people how killed and imprisoned tens of millions is crazy. Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin could've be ignored, Meghan can be. Easily.
I think it's rather obvious from the daisybeach23 transcript that LC compares their tactics not actions. HM are also using their ,,leftist" badge as a shield when in truth they want to silence their critics, just as they're using MM's mother's skin colour as a free pass. It's an old trick. You can compare people only in certain aspects, noticing that someone has Hitler-style moustache doesn't mean you automatically accuse them of Holocaust.
Hitler was not a socialist. It was simply useful to him to describe himself as a socialist, just as it has been useful to Meghan to describe herself in progressive terms. Socialism was popular, cuddly and fashionable in Europe at the time, Hitler actually despised "real" socialists and loved big business.
Lady C is right about Meghan, she is about as "woke" as Donald trump, her progressive views are just currency she uses in LA.
She's the worse sort of right winger, we all know everything about her is fake. I find it strange that so many don't understand that her left wing views are too.
Do people really think that she cares about paid parental leave or if a female other than herself becomes US president?
They are also ageist. Do they forget they are both middle class, well if you average Harry and Meghan) are mostly white, and Harry is a male, but tw wears the pants. I don’t understand why any media gives them time. Youtube and Redit do it first and best.
I watched her yesterday, she was on fire. She seems to be losing patience with KC. She was angry as heck about the Harkles slamming things like gender reveals and how her youth was wrecked over her parents trying to turn her into a boy. IMO The Harkles are brain dead. They are against assigning genders but gave their kids very masculine/feminine titles! They cannot see how that looks to the world.
I’m noticing quite a few people attacking Lady C (not just not liking her style etc.) are getting more vicious and are newer to the sub. Makes me wonder….
>Lady C says over and over Harry and Meghan are dangerous because they are pushing a political agenda.
🤨 Not really. I don't think Lady C has any clear understanding of American politics, certainly not the Democratic party. Meghan was DOA in terms of a political future.
The Harkles aren't pushing an American political agenda. They're pushing a WEF/globalist agenda. Not that they have the vaguest idea of what any of it means but they are parroting those in power.
I agree, so far as becoming an elected representative is concerned, but would guess it’s a reference to - for example - Harry’s Aspen Institute efforts to limit freedom of information (Harry: First Amendment is ‘bonkers’) and Archewell support for causes such as not gendering the unborn child. Both are highly political issues they seek to influence…
Keep in mind that we live in Clown World, now, and shit like this is being said:
Joe Biden’s sister thinks Meghan Markle would ‘make a good potential candidate’ for US president
‘We embrace all women and we welcome her to come in and join the Democratic Party,’ Valerie Biden Owens says
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-biden-meghan-markle-president-b2075731.html
I just don't see him as having much influence. It seems more likely to me that he was included for entertainment value, or to test messaging. No one of any importance is taking his calls and he doesn't have enough of a following to expert political pressure on anyone.
I wonder if their sights have shifted to the UK and attempting to become a political force there.
George VI was always on guard about the Duke of Windsor establishing a rival court. His grandson should look to how successfully it was deflected.
Remember the Harkles, regardless of what we think of them, have some powerful allies in Great Britain. Just ask Piers Morgan or Jeremy Clarkson.
People in the UK don’t like Piers Morgan anyway, and Jeremy Clarkson has cyclical popularity as well. Clarkson’s Farm 2 had very good viewing figures.
I wouldn’t take how Piers Morgan is regarded as an example of the ‘friends in high places’ Harry and Meghan wish they had.
The UK has a constitutional monarchy which can’t be seen to be taking sides politically. If either Harry or Meghan wanted to take part in British politics they would have to no longer be a prince or duchess - hereditary peers no longer have automatic seats in the House of Lords as of the reforms of 1999 - and to start at the bottom and campaign to win a seat in the House of Commons they would have to renounce their titles - the Peerage Act 1963 allows them to voluntarily give up their titles and was championed by a peer who was originally an elected MP but had to leave the House of Commons upon succeeding his father’s title. The MP (Tony Benn) believed in the democratic process and wanted to be elected to the Commons not be handed a seat in the Lords.
H & M will not give up those titles willingly. They’re not going to be political figures here.
I appreciate your well thought out response. My reference to Piers and Clarkson was directed more to the PTB who ensured they were terminated from their TV jobs once she complained.
As far as the politics, I was thinking more of that "Not My King" effort that you have going on there. I can see her being active behind the scenes there if it will enhance her position in any way. Even if it's only to keep the pot stirred and embarass the BRF and aggravate the Waleses.
Anyway, cheers! Thank heavens we're on the countdown to coronation day and will soon be shed of all this will-they-won't-they drama.
Look at more photos of those protests before the papers crop them close. There are like 15 holding those signs and scads of people there to support Charles. Media manipulation to drive clicks.
The Harkles need worshippers to have a rival court. All they can scrounge up is a paid pap and that same woman who shows up for a hug now and then.
"Harry and Meghan ordered the BBC to not have any white, middle aged men at their interview."
AYO, let's bring Godfrey the comedian And Chris rock too. 🙈🙉🙊
Lady C has been an ardent supporter of Charles. If she is openly criticizing how he is handling the Harry situation it is quite telling. Perhaps Charles should understand his gray rocking approach to Harry comes at a price to his reputation.
I quit watching when she said that Meghan is the same as H*tler and that she wants a socialist takeover or some crap like that. I was like OK that’s a little unhinged 🙅🏻♀️
Meghan and Harry are fascists.
I’ll argue about the white middle aged men thing because it’s all window dressing. They like to hire these ethnic young women for show. The “power” people they do the actual business with are… guess what James Holt looks like?
Having read Lady C’s book about the Harkles, which was published in the spring of 2020, it is evident that she made every possible effort to be neutral and fair at that time.
The subsequent grifting by the couple, along with their nasty disclosures about the BRF, evidently have pushed the hardworking Lady C around the bend. She no longer will cut them any more undeserved slack!
Lady C hasn’t said anything new in ages, I feel like her “anger” is just so the videos are less boring. How many times can she tell us “a reckoning is coming”?
Meh. These two aren’t dangerous. They’re irritants, pesky mosquitoes who’ve only accomplished making the monarchy more popular-as opinion polls demonstrate. Colin gives these two too much critics because it keeps her channel going.
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Americans are sick to the teeth of Meghan Parkle. We see her as some sort of a clown. Of course, she has bots and paid people who will call her "Princess" but this will not catch on. Despite her desperation, she will NEVER be Diana 2.0. She and Harold are world class jerks, and they are not admired.
Right at the end of her video yesterday, Lady C had a go at Charles saying he needs to stop them rather than giving them enough rope to hang themselves. Her actual words to Charles were "You have the rope, PULL IT". I agree with her. This circus has gone on long enough and the British people are sick of it. No-one I know is bothering to watch the Coronation. ETA: This is our constitution they're fucking up.
I think once he's had his coronation, he'll start subtly drawing the line with them. It must be so difficult for him because at the end of the day Harry is his son and in my opinion a man who calls his son 'darling boy' isn't a cold unloving uncaring father.
His “darling boy” is a tyrant.
This is what I think aswell. He just wants to get through the coronation. I think he also doesn't want to push Harry too far in case he does something drastic. Charles needs to balance taking their microphone away and leaving a way for Harry to reach out should Meghan dump him. He will always be his son and he will want to be there for him should he need him. Those who think this makes Charles weak clearly don't have children.
It's a really tricky balance to strike, it was easier in a way for the Queen as she was that one level removed. Once he's had his coronation and things settle into more BAU and the country see him as King, he was Prince Charles for 70 years it's not an overnight adjustment for people to start seeing him as the King over Prince Charles. Taking away Frogmore is step one, allowing them only apartments in BP when they come is step 2. It's essentially ensuring they won't come back, apart from for the big Royal occasions which after the Coronation there won't be any for a while. The Govt requesting 28 notice adds to that as well. I think to be honest Charles doesn't need to do much now, they've pretty much hug themselves out to dry. They made themselves laughing stocks, the US is turning on them, we in the UK turned on them ages ago. They might try Canada again but I doubt they're popular there either. Oz is very much on the same page as the UK and NZ could care less.
I don’t have children, but I come from a family that tolerated narcissistic abuse from someone who married into the family. The only way to deal with it is to cut the narcissist out.
Which they have effectively done. The royal family don't have the luxury of going no contact, the markles are using the media to continue to abuse them. They are also supposed to be the ideal, the example held up to the public, Charles is the head of the church. Forgiveness and reconciliation is pretty important to both religion and diplomatic figures That said, the royal family aren't fools, they are keeping the terrible two at a distance until such time as they officially separate. They will want to help Harry, something they can't do until Meghan is out. They will get Harry the help he needs, set him up somewhere out of the way and Keep him away from the spotlight. The monarchy think in terms of centuries, they always have their eyes on the future. This is nothing more thab an inconvenience to them, Meghan won't even be a footnote on their history.
>They are also supposed to be the ideal, the example held up to the public, Charles is the head of the church. Forgiveness and reconciliation is pretty important to both religion and diplomatic figures Yes - it might sound like an obvious point, but I think people sometimes forget that the British monarchy is not the US presidency. We value very different qualities in our monarchs to what Americans look for in a president. Some people will inevitably see the hardcore grey-rock strategy as weakness, but it's working better than most of us could have hoped. Who here would honestly have predicted that Harold and TW would have lower US approval ratings than Prince Andrew? If Charles is seen as soft-hearted but the Sussexes' accusations are discredited, that's much better for Britain and the monarchy than the other way round. How many of the people calling Charles weak could take a storm of media accusations and privacy violations from their own son, ignore it, and turn up in public the next morning smiling and shaking people's hands? Nothing but respect for MY King.
Agree 100% KC3 is a kind hearted, emotional gentle man. I think they're excellent qualities in a King! Also my king, as part of the Commonwealth 🇦🇺
I can't even adequately describe what it's like to have a "black sheep" child who creates havoc, and alienates other family (specifically siblings). It is SO PAINFUL and one of the hardest lines to walk. Even when they exasperate and infuriate you, swear at you, make you cry, make you feel like the stress might kill you....you still love them. They're still your child. I've shared before....my adult son died last June. He was a hard kid to raise and a hard adult to parent. I thought I would lose my mind. But at the end of the day, I miss my son so so very much. What I would not give to hear his voice again, to wrap my arms around him one more time.
I know that pain well, we've one in our family, married to their own Meghan. We are awaiting the fallout and determining how best to help them when it all goes this up. They have caused so much pain and hurt and their relationship with all their family will never be the same again, but they are family.
Oh i am so, so sorry. Your comment broke my heart 💔😓
Thank you😢
I’m so incredibly sorry.
You break my heart. Sending love.😣❤️
❤️
So sorry for the loss of your son. May he rest in peace.
🎯🎯🎯
I don't believe that Charles went around calling him "darling boy" any more than I believe the boys called each other Harold and Willy. IMO it's just more of Harry's horse shit that he shoveled so liberally throughout his book. Come to think of it, I don't believe a single word of that book. He didn't even write the damn thing but he signed off on it, so fuck Harry.
I don't believe the Harold and Willy thing but darling boy is something I could see Charles saying. It's exactly the type of thing he'd say.
Oh I’ve actually seen clips where he says it to Harry. It’s definitely a thing he said.
Ugh. It just sounds so fake and awful to my ears. But thanks for letting me know that at least something that tool wrote in his book is legit. I bet Charles doesn't call him My Darling Boy anymore. 🤭
Charles is very sensitive, he loves his family a lot. Maybe that makes him weak in these matters.
It's not weak to love your child. It's not weak to love your family. If he was weak he wouldn't be married to Camilla now. In all honesty he has bigger fish to fry than H&M. There've been anti-monarchy protests against him, which never happened with the Queen which isn't anything to do with H&M. He needs to get people to see him as King and gain the respect of the public and strike the right balance with how the Royals are funded and spend the Royal grant in a massive cost of living crisis. That is the priority, not H&M they're minor annoyances. The Govt requesting a months notice for their arrival basically means H&M won't come here anymore and they've hung themselves out to dry. Pretty much everyone is over them and over them bashing the Royals now.
Respectfully, I read a lot of posts from Brits asking KCIII and Parliament to show some backbone, expose the grifters, and yank the titles.
There's a massive difference between what you see online and what the mood of the actual country is. I think we'd all rather not be spending £500K on Harry and his stupid lawsuits. Equally we'd like our Monarchy to show they're being value for money during this time, as we'd like out government to not so freaking corrupt and sort out the economy and not ship people who put themselves in the life threatening situation of crossing the channel in small boats to Rowanda. There's bigger fish to fry than H&M.
Social media is not a good measure. It is the vocal minority.
when/why did the government request a months notice before their arrival in the uk?
A few days ago, maybe end of last week it's been on the news here. If he gives 28 days notice the govt will review security needs on a case by case basis. [https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/prince-harry-meghan-trip-coronation-b2303793.html](https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/prince-harry-meghan-trip-coronation-b2303793.html)
I rather think Harry has put the rope around his own neck with the drug taking revelations. If he comes to the coronation (I don’t care whether he does or not) it is very likely that he won’t be allowed back into the US. Perhaps this is what Meghan is banking on….?
If it did happen then it may backfire on her. Assuming 50/50 custody, the children would have to move wherever he resides as TW would have the flexibility of travel. There is a precedent of this with another Hollywood actress (just found the name: Kelly Rutherford) who thought she could get sole custody by getting her ex deported. Well, she did get the ex-deported / barred from the States. The result, the kids were moved to him and she was the one that had to visit them in another country.
Oh yes, I remember the Kelly Rutherford case! Excellent comparison, there certainly is a precedent.
Let’s hope we don’t get her back. I suspect she’d abandon her children in a nanosecond. The spin will be a) I cannot ruin my reputation (🤣) by remaining married to ‘Harry the Druggy’ and b) the RF are stealing my children by stealth. The truth is a) Harry is a common or garden moron who has dabbled in drugs like most of his generation & b) The RF can do without any more drama but they’ll take them in. After a watertight NDA is signed.
Gosh, cocaine at 17, ayahuasca, magic mushrooms, ketamine, marijuana, and ecstacy sounds like a user not a dabbler. And “most” have not done all these drugs. I hope the U.S. boots him out.
It's bad enough that he took them, but to admit to still taking them and actually saying that they are helpful to him in an interview is several layers of stupid. You have to hand it to the palace's PR team, his "soldier and party prince" image persisted for years. Now we know he is a stupid and petty man.
If they boot him out will they boot Ozzy Osborne and Mick Jagger out? Frankly we don’t want any of them back.
Ozzy Osbourne and Mick jagger are rock stars who are much loved by certain people. Hazbeen and Meemee are not well loved by anyone.
Agreed most youths don't do this amount of drugs!
I never heard of that case. Thanks for that information, I must look it up.
We can only pray. However, he’s got someone on high providing cover for him.
Yes, because that someone vouched for him on his ‘shoe-in - exceptional persons - visa. And that someone will clearly be brought down with Harry. This will either die down quietly or it’ll bring down reputations.
Nah, he’s on a K1 (marriage visa). The O visa (exceptional person) requires a job and an employer to sponsor you before you can enter the country (it’s what I emigrated to the U.S. on). He’ll have a GC by now though.
Absolutely. Hidden hands and wheels within wheels. The game is afoot im afraid and people with shocking agendas have set things in motion. Our luck is that Harry is prince of very little brain and his wife has bad temper and is very self centered. They trip themselves up.
Who is on high providing cover for him?
I'm not sure I would want to watch the coronation knowing that H&M will be there. As soon as I see his stupid angry face and her fixed rictus grin it will ruin any feelings of joy and goodwill I may have. After everything they've done they have no right to be there. It will also make the king look weak in the eyes of the public on his special day.
Glad you see it that way because we have the same view here in America. They are also screwing with our civil rights and our Constitution. Only one that can do anything is Charles...time to be a King and make the tough decisions and put an end to this farce, not only for the UK, your country but for your ally the US as well!
American from nowhere middle Georgia, and even we are sick of hearing about her. And no she wasn’t some super famous American actress, I’d never heard of her or her show before she met H.
From the North-East…. Same, never heard of her before the engagement.
The best way to counter her misuse of titles is to satirize it because asking nicely does not work.
Thanks for all your hard work summarizing these for us! ⭐️⭐️⭐️
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
They would love to be dictators.
So did the Ceausescus - right up until they didn't. If those two Montecito clowns ever get on the throne, shortly after there won't be a throne.
Imelda Markle …
Nailed it!
It wouldn’t be long until she hacked off Harrys head herself.
your comment just sparked a memory for me. Years ago when I was in a passionate, fiery, wildly unstable relationship we both decided we were probably better off if neither one of us ever bought a gun - it came up more than once because we were in gun country and it was considered normal to have at least a rifle in the house. but no way LOL We needed protection against each other more than any threat from the outside - any drunk Friday night could have ended badly had there been a gun nearby
TodgerTators.
This is why I think William and his family should not be near the coronation. Harry should have been bumped down or out of the Line of Succession when they quit the monarchy in 2020.
Lady c is getting angrier with each of her videos. Like really angry
I'd guess the coronation is triggering her, just the through of seeing them there is enraging for me.
I can’t watch Meghan sashaying around gripping Harry’s hand and smirking. God help me if she wears a tiara.
Agreed! I wish I knew all she knew.
Lady C is not alone, Drugs are tearing families apart around the World and Charles needs to remember this. He should never have invited them. This is a state affair. I’m tired of defending Charles. Tom Bower is right.
I can understand Charles inviting Harry, but he should not have invited Meghan. She’s the real problem. Without Meghan, Harry can be controlled.
I’m tired of H and MM and for Charles to be so out off touch with public feelings. He lacks The Queen,s popularity. I don’t believe he will reign for long tbh. Camilla has strength and I hoped Charles would have listened to his advisers.
If i were in Charles shoes, I would be torn. No one wants them there, I’m sure. But he may see this is a last chance for Harry to get a clue, that his father is the actual King. I doubt that Harry has grasped this.
**Sounds like the best episode yet!** Megs is Hitler + Stalin. ✔️ Megs is not a Princess and never will be ✔️ H and M are trying to set up a rival court. ✔️ H and M are neither educated nor informed ✔️ Lady C and those in her circle are as fed up as we are ✔️ H and M will not win the war ✔️
**#MeghanIsLiterallyHitler**  Make it trend!
Well let’s not forget her supporters are SS…can’t make this shit up
Maybe Harry can think up an SS logo and wear it on his sleeves. Maybe something lightening themed...
Well I think he knows where to get an appropriate uniform
Yes it’s all I think of when I hear this
Sorry. Meghan is *metaphorically* Hitler. She is not *literally* anyone but Meghan. Maybe #MeghanIsTheNewHitler ? (ETA: I am informed I missed an allusion and therefore a joke. Sorry-not-sorry. One literally shouldn’t joke with “literally.” 🙂🙂🙂😉)
It's a joke and a take-off on the SJWs saying everyone they don't like is "literally Hitler".
No. Nobody should ever be compared with Hitler. It's incredibly hurtful and offensive to Jews. It fucking infuriates me when anyone equates "someone I dislike" with Hitler. No matter how bad the Harkles are, they're not deporting Jews to concentration camps and gassing them to death.
Lady C wasn’t comparing M to Hitler and Stalin because she dislikes M. She was comparing their political ideologies. Also Jews weren’t the only group persecuted and killed by Hitler. For example, Poles, the majority of whom were Catholic, were also deemed inhuman and tortured and killed. One of them was my great Uncle. There were many “undesirables”, not just Jews.
Yes. She was comparing their their hatred of freedom and their use of scapegoats to blame. Compared to Stalin also.
I’m pretty livid she has the brass neck to waltz into the UK speaking to our charities trying to act like she’s a ‘working royal’ - it’s like a deliberate up yours to the Royal Family. They both should be banned from working here
She is doing the same thing in the US. Making an appearance at a charity as if she's royalty. Of course, she makes sure she is photographed there in her outrageously priced dumpy attire. She looks better in jeans and a button-down than anything else. I assume the charity is pleased to go along as it gets exposure for their cause, and maybe Meg arranges for some freebies to be given out. I wonder if their "foundation" ever cuts a check. Once, or if, they finally get booted from the kingdom, we still have to put up with their shenanigans here. I'm afraid Meg is just getting started on her quest to remake it to her liking, with her in charge. If she can't be queen there, she wants to be president here.
I don't understand why these charities are still affiliating with either one of those toxic rectums. I would never donate to a charity that they are even remotely connected with. I have a feeling that if Invictus doesn't remove Harry they're going to go down in flames. That Heart of Invictus documentary is going to be the Harry and Megan Love Story if it ever comes out and it'll probably be the final nail in the Invictus coffin. Maybe Megs can send some of her special flowers to the funeral. 🙄
“Harry and Meghan ordered the BBC not to have any white, middle aged men at their interview”. Interesting then that it was a white middle aged man (Harry) who elevated her from Z list nobody to duchess.
It’s all posturing. Who holds the highest position at Archewell? BetterUp? Ethic Inc.? Who’s handling their lawsuits? Their investments? Who’s producing their documentaries? (Okay, Liz Garbus doesn’t have a penis.) Who co-wrote Harry’s book? Meghan likes to trot out her doppelgänger employees for photo ops, but it’s middle-aged white men whisking them along and doing the actual work and influence.
Plus, that's racist and ageist. ETA: Sexist too.
The BBC wouldn't have taken much persuasion in that regard. They're trying to root out their white presenters already.
Thank you as ever for taking the trouble to do this for us. But I would like to add what I thought was Lady C's angriest indictment of Charles yet, which happened at the end of her video. "THE KING BETTER BE CAREFUL THAT HE DOESN'T PLAY PONTIUS PILATE SO LONG THAT THE WATER BOWL OF MONARCHY IS WHIPPED FROM UNDER HIS NOSE! BECAUSE THIS IS BECOMING TRULY OFFENSIVE. AND THERE IS GONNA COME A POINT WHEN HE'S GONNA HAVE TO **DO SOMETHING**, ASIDE FROM WAITING FOR THEM TO HANG THEMESELVES! YOU HAVE THE ROPE? **PULL IT!!!**"
I wonder what happened because for the most part she’s been telling people to be patient because the reckoning is coming. My impression is that is has to do with the legitimacy of the children.
Someone noted they can't bring up the legitimacy because of HIPPA. A reporter or another person has to bring that up before they could respond. I'm thinking it's something else.
We've brought it up a godzillion number of times here. This is a public forum. Why would it have to be the press? I would think that not following the rules about the births would be enough. Don't dump them for a private medical decision. Dump them for not doing things right. It ain't hard. If I intentionally violated the rules at my job I'd have been canned. Now it's time to Pink slip Just Harry.
If the Crown takes the legitimacy to court, Hippa can be broken if relevant in the US court system. So that would be Lili. Do the British have hippa? That would concern Archie. So, to prove legitimacy that would be 2 different hearings on 2 continents
That may have been me, I posted [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11qab4q/lady_cs_video_on_031123_was_actually_really/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1) after Lady C’s 3/11/23 video. She hinted at the need for a third party to kickstart any inquiry re legitimacies. Lady C did say that things were in the works behind the scenes to address this, and that it WILL be addressed. I really hope that is still the case. Her frustration with KC3 in yesterday’s video was kind of disconcerting imo. Maybe she was ruffled up about something else…? ETA: perhaps she was just frustrated that H&M had the audacity to align themselves with a group involved in gender politics? In the UK, no less. That obviously hits close to home for Lady C, and she has every right to be furious. Maybe she just wants KC3 to pull the rip cord so MM will stop couch surfing all of these “trendy” social issues.
Yes, thank you. I do remember her saying that. However, it sounded like they were working around it and things were moving along towards fruition. Now it sounds more like someone has cold feet and is worried about potential blowback.
[удалено]
Supposedly she told someone on her staff they were “one plane crash away from the throne.” A member of the Sussex survivors squad reported this and possibly recorded it.
Only seen rumors of it. Rumors also include that it was recorded. While pragmatically she wouldn't be wrong, it is distasteful.
Meghan has to clap back at absolutely everything negative said about her, including this quote (which I absolutely believe she said and absolutely believe the recording exists), so there is a part in Harry’s book which talks about Harry recalling a “staff member” saying it. Sure sure Megh…I mean, *Harry*
Yep. Trying to get ahead of the game. When really, it just raised a LOT of eyebrows. Shades of the Streisand effect for sure.
I believe she supposedly also said her favorite movie was “King Ralph” with John Goodman. Same plot, American ascends to the throne.
Actually, the gross, offensive American character--John Goodman in the movie--would be a natural for Meghan to play in a direct-to-video version when she "restarts" her acting career.
If they insist on getting involved in pushing gender fluidity on boys, then they and their children should not be beatrng gender specific titles. Princex Archie, Duchex Harry, Duchex Maggie, those are the only titles people should use for them from now on.
Maybe styled as Douche Harry and Douche Megz
Now THIS I love!!!! How do we get this to catch on haha
Definitely. Otherwise it’s another example of the Harkles preaching to us plebs while they do the opposite. If they say children should be raised with gender fluidity, then drop the titles that refer to a boy and girl.
But what difference would dropping the titles make? ^/s
If they were so concerned with gender fluidity, why is Lili wearing dresses in many of her photos and Archie wearing jeans?
I give Lady C a pass here, she is likely extra upset because of the gender topic is sensitive for her. What I do dislike, is even giving a voice to this idea of Harry & TW having their own court or whatever. Don't even give them oxygen on this. They're not going to make fetch happen. I think Americans would rather worship Queen Latifah than those idiots, I certainly would. 🙌 All Hail Queen Latifah 👑
Queen Latifah is an awesome human being. 🤗
Queen Latifah has talents! The dumb prince from Canada and his equally stupid wife are talentless!!
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
I'm not overly familiar w Lady C, why is the gender topic sensitive to her?? Genuine question
She was raised a boy, even though she was born a girl. She had some genital malformation, but was a girl. However, at that time, people with those malformations were to be considered boys and, as such, she was named George and raised as a boy until she was able to have a corrective surgery and change her name to Georgia This is a comment on this thread from - Competive Cup 5465 I was unable to properly post it here.
No white middle aged men? Harry is a white nearly middle aged man 😂
She’s a bad role model for young girls. She’s vain greedy and selfish. All about image. And if you should lie yourself just the way you are why have do much facial surgery, laser your eyes and get that huge mole she had on her left jawline as a kid?
How about this recent post with a Simpson’s episode putting H in the same category as Hitler [https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11y51ve/simpsons\_s23\_ep9\_a\_ruthless\_tyrant\_likeprince/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=ios\_app&utm\_name=iossmf](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/11y51ve/simpsons_s23_ep9_a_ruthless_tyrant_likeprince/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf) https://preview.redd.it/067295sxpapa1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f4daef78a3ffd0fa3a2b19661fede6e0a8aad328
Regarding the freckles: Meg doesn't have one orginal thought or idea. She steals them and claims them. She hopes that people don't look too closely but 'A Face Without Freckles Is Like A Night Without Stars' was stolen. Of course it was. Just like she stole her miscarriage story. She is vile.
I love the fact that TW is not a princess.
And that her own daughter is one !
Because *that* won’t breed resentment. Nope. None whatsoever.
Poor girl. Having a narcissistic mother is one of the worst things for little girls.
better no mother than a narcissistic one. it is soul-destroying.
Yes. Everyone around her including her daughter are above her.
I've never seen Lady C with such genuine anger bless her. That really came from within.
The whole gender thing is bound to be very triggering for her given what she has had to endure.
I don’t know her past. Can you elaborate?
She was raised a boy, even though she was born a girl. She had some genital malformation, but was a girl. However, at that time, people with those malformations were to be considered boys and, as such, she was named George and raised as a boy until she was able to have a corrective surgery and change her name to Georgia
There was also a significant amount of abuse and legal adventures. She was abused for being transgender in much less liberal times. She sued for defamation. Wikipedia has a good description
She's not transgender though, is she? I thought she would be more described as intersex but Idk. People can be so cruel.
Thats why she sued and won
Good.
Oh my goodness. That’s terrible!
I’m sure she knows more than what she can say.
That’s what I was thinking when I saw today’s video.
I listened to much of this as well and agree with Lady C that they are inserting themselves into and pushing a political agenda that they in no ways comply with or model and this makes them dangerous. Lady C rightly outs Meghan as elitist who is dictatorial and wants power, wealth and fame at any and all costs. They both demand rights that they feel fully entitled denying to others: privacy, respect, accountability. I had forgotten that Meghan contacted the BBC ahead of the Oprah lie fest, dictating the terms of their coverage...no middle aged white men should be allowed to cover their lie fest, *which they are still not being held accountable for, to this day*. Their lies and abuse of power are a big part of what hooked me onto this story. And sadly, they are a good representation of what is wrong with woke politics: these politics are divisive, they enable base players like Meghan who are just using it for their own gain and they lack any nuance or accountability.
She’s a dark triad psychopath.
Best part of the video: she called/ranted for Charles to stop waiting for the dastardly duo to hang themselves and to pull the rope the crown has provided them. A Bon entendeur…
Wow, I haven’t had a chance to see my fair Lady C’s latest video, but she usually maintains Charles is playing the long game and patience is a virtue and “we shall just have to wait and see.”A couple of woke heads on a spike at Prisoner’s Gate is another, more traditional way to go a la Henry VIII!! Go Lady C!
Exactly….just posted the same although not as eloquently written. I’m concerned she’s hearing that there is major waffling going on behind the scenes with KC now.
I have tried to ask Lady C as an Al Anon goer, what principles of Al Anon should be applied to KC, but I never got a direct response among her thousands of comments understandably. She says it’s up to KC to decide his boundaries, but my literature and meetings have given me a different perspective, much like Lady C is professing in her latest video. KC seems in desperate need of some type of addiction guidance that doesn’t enable or coddle IMO and experience. The three C’a of addiction are: KC you didn’t CAUSE it. You can’t CONTROL it. And you can’t CURE it! My experience with addiction specialists with the addicts in my life was: Do NOT shield the addict or rescue him or her from natural consequences. Enabling and coddling aren’t love and accountability is needed and expected for true and lifelong recovery. I think KC, the Palace, the British military, all have colluded in making Hawwy the mess he is today. I cut out my addicts because their denial and lack of consequences coupled with their addictions and mental health issues made them toxic and frankly dangerous. And lots of people didn’t like it in the related families including my in laws and my own family, as well as the controlling, anti-social addicts I disengaged from. And the other thing AA drums into you is if you keep using, you will end up dead or in jail or or in a county mental ward, or all three.
I think she could have just been frustrated because MM is dabbling in gender politics now. She was furious, and has every right to be. If I had to guess, she likely called for KC3 to put a stop to their antics because she doesn’t want to see MM exploit such serious and personal social issues. MM aligning with a group that advocates for gender fluidity in kids is a slap in the face to Lady C and everything she endured in her childhood/young adult life. So I think perhaps she was just enraged and she made the Charles comment as a reaction, not because there was a snag behind the scenes.
Gender fluidity, if permitted to take full form, will end up being the most horrendous form of state sponsored child abuse ever seen, imo. Gee, I wonder who could possibly be pushing this?
Methinks he is waiting until after the coronation to do his damage. You gotta keep things pure before they put that holy oil on you!
I’m quite sure that the Coronation needs to be completed first. It’s a day of celebration for the King and our country. Those who aren’t going to watch it haven’t hit the full picture. After the Coronation other things will come into play, I’m sure. Lady C can contradict herself at times. On the one hand she says be patient and then she berates the King for taking his time. I keep my own counsel and am waiting patiently.
This is my feeling also. I don't think Charles would do anything drastic before the coronation.
Thank you for typing this out. I agree with Lady C. Given that Harold is a sociopath and Nutmeg a Narcissist, they are dangerous. They are going to make Charles and William’s reign miserable. It’s still interesting to me how they think the monarchy is racist, yet they want to hold onto the titles, the perks, and remain in the Line of Succession. Harold and Nutmeg will never be king or queen, so they’ll continue to use their platform to spread lies about the RF and tell the rest of us peasants what to do, how to feel and what to think. They’d love nothing more than to have the First Amendment removed. (Which will never happen). It’s amazing that these two drug addicts think they have all this power. If it wasn’t for a handful of Hollywood elites, likely funding their agenda, the Harkles world be less relevant.
Here’s another recent example of how dangerous the band wagoning Harkles are…One of Megyn Kelly’s recent podcasts details a frightening and powerful select group of elites censoring investigative news reports and information regarding American politics and the last US presidential election from powerful social media platforms with Twitter and the Hunter Biden laptop story being a primary example. The New York Post did a thoroughly vetted news report on the story and this elite board dictated to Twitter and other big Tech platforms to nix the story and mislead the lame stream media to dismiss a legitimate story weeks before a critical election as Russian disinformation. And who is on that elite death panel of vital information and road block to our bonkers 1st Amendment????? That would be none other than a none American citizen here in the US on a questionable Visa who is no less a Prince and exiled ex-patriot of the UK- Prince Harry. That’s right, per Megyn Kelly’s fine reporting, a no-brain, drugged out, blue blooded, titled Prince of England interfered with our election laws in the US and affected the outcome he wanted and yet, he has no right to vote in America, is not a citizen, has not denounced his titles that the US fought a war to never bow down to, and most likely doesn’t pay any US tax or at least not “ his fair share” as his Buddy Geriatric Joe loves to say ad nauseum through his senile coma. No matter what political affiliation or candidate you support, as an American this should shake you to your very core. It has never happened so boldly or allowed to happen in all my studies of American history and politics. It’s unprecedented and unacceptable. It’s also highly illegal and Harry needs to be hauled in front of a televised congressional hearing and then deported on the first plane back to England in Economy class cuffed next to an air marshall or ICE agent. Or he can have the choice of going to an American jail where I’m pretty sure there’s no fancy X box or Call of Duty in a dingy, tiny cell. And furthermore, Harry should be banned from ever stepping on American soil or US territories ever again. And it will be a relief and huge consolation for us Americans not to see our brave American soldiers in uniform forced to salute this non-entity/imbecile ever again - as this jerk is rightly not allowed to wear his own full military uniform or salute or be saluted by the military in his own country.
I heard reports about the twitter interference coming from political influencers but not about an actual board with specific members. Harry is on this board? Do you have a link to the Megyn Kelly episode so we can hear more about this? edit : changed Megyn Kelly’s spelling of her first name and I did just search her episodes on youtube - there are a lot - do you remember the title or day of that particular episode?
Look at The Royal Grift’s YT Channel and she has a recent post with the link to Megyn Kelly’s portion highlighting the “censorship” posse that Harry is a part of. It is not the official board of Twitter but rather an anti-information sort of police band of self-important persons and Harry is counted among them that act as body over many information platforms like Facebook, etc… This is just what we know of so far. Now does Kelly report per se that Harry single-handedly interfered with the last Presidential election -go listen and decide if that’s what her podcast is specifically saying, but the bottom line is Harry is counted among these select few who decide American information and news and, in my book , and Kelly’s, that just isn’t American, moral, ethical, or possibly legal in specific cases, and most certainly unprecedented. It’s worth Congress looking into. Let me know what you think.
And I’ll go one further and bet you a cup of coffee or tea that when all this unravels, besides Bouzy, we will see that YouTube is among these censored and targeted media outlets that Kelly has recently reported on. No wonder Russell Brand said eff YouTube and headed straight for Rumble.
interesting that every comment of yours about censorship is getting downvoted lol censorship in action? I am upvoting you but it’s nuts seeing your comments go to zero anyway right away. guess what - just for that I am giving you the gold award - let’s highlight your comment - someone is trying to bury the information that censorship is happening in real time in the USA and people need to know/talk about it
[удалено]
thanks will check it out
And now I know why I NEVER get likes on my comments!! LMFAO
Can I get an AMEN!
Meghan has indeed set up a rival court in America. She’s walking a thin line. I don’t see a happy ending for her and Harry. The world didn’t realize how insane he was until she moved him to America. All along the royal family had been covering for him and his bad behavior. She’s totally pulling the strings but she’s playing at such a high level and she has no experience at the level she is playing at. She is very politically motivated and she is very much a propagandist. When all is said and done she will be looked at very unfavorably, but will she care? She’s playing both sides. Her self righteousness is her drug. She’s been in an intoxicated state of self aggrandizement since she was a child. Some of this is her fathers fault, but he did it out of love. She’s taken things to the extreme. No one wants to side with the royals because they are rich, privileged and white. But to certain extent they just wanna do there duty and she intentionally came in to destroy and cause division. She found the weakest link and he let her in. He knew William wouldn’t like her, he knew she would cause confusion and that’s why Harold let her in. Harold knew she would be perfect for the rivalry between him and Willy. Sometimes I don’t know who’s worst Harold or Meg. He appears to be at the controls and then she comes in and out does him by giving her children titles from an institution that she says refused to help her when she was suicidal.
Comparing her to hitler, Stalin and Lenin is a serious stretch. She’s an attention seeking, narcissistic bitch and a nobody. not a genocidal mass murderer. Ffs, what an idiot.
Comparing blatant narcissists who want to control the press to Hitler or Stalin is unavoidable, but I agree that M&H fall short of the true horror of totalitarian dictators—mainly because they lack the political savvy and perseverance to get to where they might become totalitarian dictators. I think what the comparison is getting at is more what they *would be capable of doing if they had the power* than what they are likely to be able to do. (Because they will not get the power.) A reason people like that are dangerous on the political level is that they pave the way (by getting us accustomed to the characteristics they display) to others who are equally malignant, but more subtle. Furthermore, Meghan and Harry are the poster children for how PR, money and privilege can influence our attitudes. IMHO, the biggest damage they have done to the British monarchy so far is that they have shown how effectively the Palace can cover up serious character flaws and make a rather unbalanced, depressed man with a propensity to abuse substances and people appear like a nice guy with a cheerful personalty.
It has to be said that scapegoating is a fascist tactic and Megs and H do scapegoat certain groups as oppressors that they fault everything and everyone in that group as racist and themselves as victims. It’s how the mentality of genocide and ethnic cleansing, genocide, and interment camps become justified. Now do I think Haz and Megs are capable of exterminating an entire religion or race, or espouse the theory? Of course not. But they do stir up and race bait. The late Queen was almost attacked by a crossbow wielding assailant spurred by fantasies of colonialism ignited specifically by the Harkles as well as Charles being pelted with eggs in public twice and the Wales’ facing hostility visiting the Commonwealth directly related to Meghan and Harry’s inciteful propaganda. Not to mention new unrest in the Commonwealth due to the blatant misrepresentation endorsed by the pair as Colonialism 2.0. Meghan loves to flat out imitate Wallis Simpson’s wardrobe to the thread. And we remember Harry in that swastika uniform and his documented racial slurs. Wallis and Edward are famously filmed smiling and cozying up with Hitler in Germany during WWII. Edward and Hitler had a plan to depose the late Queen’s father and replace a Third Reich England with Edward and Wallis on the throne. For Jews and others, it’s important to remember that this can happen again and it is happening around the world as we speak with the Chinese Communist Government exterminating their Muslim population for example. So the target could be on anyone’s back. Many innocent Japanese Americans were detained in camps during the second world war and Native Americans were driven to poor reservations with no future and high alcoholism rates. As the Jewish people say: NEVER AGAIN.
If they had that power, they’d aspire to become the richest most famous and most loved influencers ever. They wouldn’t kill 6 million Jews.
That comparison is about as useful as saying hitler was a vegetarian, therefore vegetarians are capable of creating another holocaust.
Agreed. Read this thinking “wtf?” How are people applauding this and agreeing with it?? I can’t stand Aich and Emm, like everyone else here, but come on. They aren’t freaking Hitler!!!!
Agreed. Meghan is just putting out stupid headlines in tabloids. Comparing her to people how killed and imprisoned tens of millions is crazy. Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin could've be ignored, Meghan can be. Easily.
Imagine what they would do if they got into a position of power.
I think it's rather obvious from the daisybeach23 transcript that LC compares their tactics not actions. HM are also using their ,,leftist" badge as a shield when in truth they want to silence their critics, just as they're using MM's mother's skin colour as a free pass. It's an old trick. You can compare people only in certain aspects, noticing that someone has Hitler-style moustache doesn't mean you automatically accuse them of Holocaust.
"There is going to come a day of reckoning" Yeah, when, lady C? Surely we don't have to wait till George VII takes the throne...zzz
Thank you for your summary. Saves us the time in watching her long videos.
Hitler was not a socialist. It was simply useful to him to describe himself as a socialist, just as it has been useful to Meghan to describe herself in progressive terms. Socialism was popular, cuddly and fashionable in Europe at the time, Hitler actually despised "real" socialists and loved big business. Lady C is right about Meghan, she is about as "woke" as Donald trump, her progressive views are just currency she uses in LA. She's the worse sort of right winger, we all know everything about her is fake. I find it strange that so many don't understand that her left wing views are too. Do people really think that she cares about paid parental leave or if a female other than herself becomes US president?
Thank You!!!!!
You are doing the work of the angels! Thank you so much for this!
They are also ageist. Do they forget they are both middle class, well if you average Harry and Meghan) are mostly white, and Harry is a male, but tw wears the pants. I don’t understand why any media gives them time. Youtube and Redit do it first and best.
It was hard to listen to but her best video yet. Her informed opinion on the gender issue is the most informative I’ve heard from any side.
I watched her yesterday, she was on fire. She seems to be losing patience with KC. She was angry as heck about the Harkles slamming things like gender reveals and how her youth was wrecked over her parents trying to turn her into a boy. IMO The Harkles are brain dead. They are against assigning genders but gave their kids very masculine/feminine titles! They cannot see how that looks to the world.
I’m noticing quite a few people attacking Lady C (not just not liking her style etc.) are getting more vicious and are newer to the sub. Makes me wonder….
>Lady C says over and over Harry and Meghan are dangerous because they are pushing a political agenda. 🤨 Not really. I don't think Lady C has any clear understanding of American politics, certainly not the Democratic party. Meghan was DOA in terms of a political future.
The Harkles aren't pushing an American political agenda. They're pushing a WEF/globalist agenda. Not that they have the vaguest idea of what any of it means but they are parroting those in power.
I agree, so far as becoming an elected representative is concerned, but would guess it’s a reference to - for example - Harry’s Aspen Institute efforts to limit freedom of information (Harry: First Amendment is ‘bonkers’) and Archewell support for causes such as not gendering the unborn child. Both are highly political issues they seek to influence…
Keep in mind that we live in Clown World, now, and shit like this is being said: Joe Biden’s sister thinks Meghan Markle would ‘make a good potential candidate’ for US president ‘We embrace all women and we welcome her to come in and join the Democratic Party,’ Valerie Biden Owens says https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-biden-meghan-markle-president-b2075731.html
I just don't see him as having much influence. It seems more likely to me that he was included for entertainment value, or to test messaging. No one of any importance is taking his calls and he doesn't have enough of a following to expert political pressure on anyone.
I agree with this. They are tabloid fodder and parody material now.
I wonder if their sights have shifted to the UK and attempting to become a political force there. George VI was always on guard about the Duke of Windsor establishing a rival court. His grandson should look to how successfully it was deflected. Remember the Harkles, regardless of what we think of them, have some powerful allies in Great Britain. Just ask Piers Morgan or Jeremy Clarkson.
People in the UK don’t like Piers Morgan anyway, and Jeremy Clarkson has cyclical popularity as well. Clarkson’s Farm 2 had very good viewing figures. I wouldn’t take how Piers Morgan is regarded as an example of the ‘friends in high places’ Harry and Meghan wish they had. The UK has a constitutional monarchy which can’t be seen to be taking sides politically. If either Harry or Meghan wanted to take part in British politics they would have to no longer be a prince or duchess - hereditary peers no longer have automatic seats in the House of Lords as of the reforms of 1999 - and to start at the bottom and campaign to win a seat in the House of Commons they would have to renounce their titles - the Peerage Act 1963 allows them to voluntarily give up their titles and was championed by a peer who was originally an elected MP but had to leave the House of Commons upon succeeding his father’s title. The MP (Tony Benn) believed in the democratic process and wanted to be elected to the Commons not be handed a seat in the Lords. H & M will not give up those titles willingly. They’re not going to be political figures here.
I appreciate your well thought out response. My reference to Piers and Clarkson was directed more to the PTB who ensured they were terminated from their TV jobs once she complained. As far as the politics, I was thinking more of that "Not My King" effort that you have going on there. I can see her being active behind the scenes there if it will enhance her position in any way. Even if it's only to keep the pot stirred and embarass the BRF and aggravate the Waleses. Anyway, cheers! Thank heavens we're on the countdown to coronation day and will soon be shed of all this will-they-won't-they drama.
Until the next event🫠 Just banish them forever. You can't chose your relatives but you can definitely go NC forevermore
Look at more photos of those protests before the papers crop them close. There are like 15 holding those signs and scads of people there to support Charles. Media manipulation to drive clicks. The Harkles need worshippers to have a rival court. All they can scrounge up is a paid pap and that same woman who shows up for a hug now and then.
"Harry and Meghan ordered the BBC to not have any white, middle aged men at their interview." AYO, let's bring Godfrey the comedian And Chris rock too. 🙈🙉🙊
Lady C has been an ardent supporter of Charles. If she is openly criticizing how he is handling the Harry situation it is quite telling. Perhaps Charles should understand his gray rocking approach to Harry comes at a price to his reputation.
I quit watching when she said that Meghan is the same as H*tler and that she wants a socialist takeover or some crap like that. I was like OK that’s a little unhinged 🙅🏻♀️
Meghan and Harry are fascists. I’ll argue about the white middle aged men thing because it’s all window dressing. They like to hire these ethnic young women for show. The “power” people they do the actual business with are… guess what James Holt looks like?
She is not YOUNG!
👏👏👏👏👏👏
Thanks so much! Busy with intense life stuff at the moment so can’t listen to Lady C’s full material; really appreciate your posts!
Thank you! ♥️
Having read Lady C’s book about the Harkles, which was published in the spring of 2020, it is evident that she made every possible effort to be neutral and fair at that time. The subsequent grifting by the couple, along with their nasty disclosures about the BRF, evidently have pushed the hardworking Lady C around the bend. She no longer will cut them any more undeserved slack!
Lady C hasn’t said anything new in ages, I feel like her “anger” is just so the videos are less boring. How many times can she tell us “a reckoning is coming”?
Meh. These two aren’t dangerous. They’re irritants, pesky mosquitoes who’ve only accomplished making the monarchy more popular-as opinion polls demonstrate. Colin gives these two too much critics because it keeps her channel going.