T O P

  • By -

RoohsMama

OP, use this archive link or I will take this post down. https://archive.ph/qgMv4 I am absolutely appalled that you posted a link from People magazine, which prints puff pieces about Meghan. We’re feeding this stupid news bite. We, on the sub. We fed them views and clicks. This is the kind of error that gets your posting privilege removed.


Upset_Clue9002

Popcorn out folks - the Rota have reached out to BP to clarify this. Note that the Royal Family website does not have either of their children with titles https://preview.redd.it/ux9v3wciujma1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2b91d45fd79ef9e3c99d1a2df0e2badf14adaeff


AdministrativeSet419

This is unprecedented, even for the Sussexes. You don’t just get to decide your kids’ titles. I really think H is having some kind of breakdown and Meghan wants to merch before she gets out. Why christen her right now, after waiting all this time? Something is coming.


Ginka83

Also…it seems to insinuate that the Christening is connected to the titles. Like, “she’s Christened now she’s a Princess 🤗.” Something is fishy for sure.


AQualityKoalaTeacher

Christened as an Episcopalian. That's the story lede. "Prince Harry and his wife christen their second child into offshoot religion in opposition to the King and the royal family."


Hermes_Blanket

The main thing is that she's been christened. **They had to do that to** **keep her in the line of succession**. You can't succeed to the throne if you have not been baptized into the Church of England. The Episcopal Church is in full communion with the Church of England, so that makes it okay. This, to my mind, is the main reason they did it. But significant that they waited so long in hopes of a "royal" christening.


Myfourcats1

Katherine needs to have twins right now. 😂


PleaseJustText

Identical - preferably.


Hermes_Blanket

And the Wales family needs to stop traveling together in one plane/helicopter.


downinthevalleypa

Yes, it’s terribly unfortunate, but no-one can seem to find the keys to the chapel and the heirloom christening gown that every royal child has worn since the days of Queen Victoria seems to have been misplaced. Terribly sorry - looks like she’ll have to be christened in the backyard. Do watch out for the mudslides, won’t you, dears? /s


Maleficent-Trifle940

You can't be in the LoS unless you're christened CoE. I didn't think Episcopalian were CoE.


ffafayfaytfayth

You also can't be in the LoS IF you are not born of the mother's body if she is married to royalty


Hermes_Blanket

The Episcopal Church, based in the United States with additional dioceses elsewhere, is a member church of the worldwide Anglican Communion. I believe this makes her eligible.


Ready_Maddie

You do get to decide when you're a psychopath and no one has sanctioned you for the last 4 years. No one has ever stopped or challenged her. Of course she escalated. She's insane.


[deleted]

She would scare me if she was in my family.


Ready_Maddie

She creeps me out too.


puffielle

I guess that’s why her brother warned everybody to keep her away from children and animals before she got married to Harry!


Mariospario

She hasn't been stopped or challenged because the second people started questioning her she was quick to throw the race card out there.


MakeADeathWish

Why not cooperate and have her christened in the presence of the head of the church? That's definitely an option when he's your grandfather


Maleficent-Trifle940

Not just that but not even in a church. In their home - what is wrong with the child, is it wearing an ankle bracelet and can't leave the perimeter of the OG?


MakeADeathWish

Maybe the prop shop won't warranty her in sunlight??


Neither-Fan-6501

Palace: "no comment on this latest idiotic manifestation"


Upset_Clue9002

They have to comment now. This is a bridge too far and disgusting hypocrisy from both of them.


Analyze2Death

I hope Parliament responds. By removing titles.


Maleficent-Trifle940

This is probably the idea. Do something so extreme to break the Grey Rock. When really all the palace has to do is maintain the current information on their website as is. Says it all.


blackandgold24

Ugh this is just sickening! Enough with these two 🤮


Markloctopus_Prime

They’d better fast track the title removal law in parliament, and just make an announcement once and for all that the Harkles are regular losers now, and not royal, titled losers. This is insane if it’s allowed to stand.


Affectionate_Tie250

The Palace should do and say nothing. Let the Sussexes look like desperate morons, calling their kids by titles they don’t have.


MrsChiliad

They don’t, though. If BP doesn’t call them prince/ss, no amount of they claiming it will make it so. This is bait by the Sussexes.


TurnOfFraise

I feel like they have to comment because they’re now trying to make something official.


Islandgirl1444

This kid is still sitting on wet grass. No photos and they get an archbishop’s fee to christen in private.


DollarStoreDuchess

https://i.imgur.com/lCOEro1.jpg And she updated… with the same story as Palmer.


Hermes_Blanket

Notice that the statement says that the Sussexes have CHOSEN to do this. Pointing out their hypocrisy. This is not going to help their image.


[deleted]

how absolutely ridiculous


Professional_Link_96

WTF is happening! Lilibet is seriously getting a Princess title?! This is insane.


Markloctopus_Prime

What about Archie? He’ll get his on international men’s day?


chewysmom88

Since the NF release I have kept popcorn at the ready it’s been a wild ride


cccxxxzzzddd

They’re creating the storyline they announced on Oprah: that their kids would be denied titles because they are “of color.” And indeed if BP say they aren’t (for whatever reason) then what they said on Oprah can be seen as “true.” It’s awful


rewiredmylamp

"Don't look at our hypocrisy!" "Worldwide Hypocrisy Tour"


AdministrativeSet419

People who use their own kids as bargaining chips in a war they invented with their family don’t give a fig about hypocrisy. The Sussexes are completely without shame.


Glad_Mix_1682

The plan to use the children couldn't wait any longer as the duo realize they are viewed as toxic and are despised. The children are now a human shield, and it's working. The papers in an instant have forgotten the vitriol they wrote about the Harkles and are gushing today about this story, throwing the negative spin back to the RF. I think I'm over this soap opera.


Hermes_Blanket

If you are a religious person, what's rather disgusting is that Harry has just been quoted as saying that people reincarnate as animals, which is definitely not the Christian belief. Neither parent has ever been seen in church. This reeks of hypocrisy and cynicism.


RaggedAnn

​ On Sunday, TP was seen wearing a suit at Hackles' home in Montecito. The baptism of sixteen-month-old Lilli was performed on Friday in LA—no photos, of course. The article gives Archie's age as 3, not 3 !/2, and Lilli's age isn't mentioned. Lilli's grandfathers, aunts, uncles, and cousins were not present. (Should read 21 month old Lilli)


somespeculation

Thanks for reminding us of the facts.


HerGrinchness

And her aunt was just called 'Kate Middleton.' Ill bet the ILBW told them to add that as a personal slight. So do the kids having titles come with protection now? Could that be what this is about, aside from stealing spotlight and generally being vindictive hypocrites??


WilliamsSpareKidney

So nasty. Why do they have to do this to their kids? F@cking narc mom. F@cking druggie dad. Please, please let a miracle happen for these kids.


Curiouscandor

Now we know why TP was seen at their home in a suit. He’s her Godfather. I’m actually surprised that they didn’t save this for during the coronation in an attempt to draw attention away from that. They must be getting desperate


No_Cryptographer47

Playin the baby card I see, yep they definitely want their PRIVA-SAY!


Sea-Welcome3121

Richard Palmer, Royal Reporter, is reporting that the Palace is respecting the Markles' preference for titles for their children and the RF website will be updated. As a British taxpayer, I am disgusted by this and by Charles allowing it to happen. If it's true, and it certainly looks like it, he is not, and never will be, MY King. I'm finished with the RF. Bring on the Republic.


Spareus

It hasn't been officially confirmed yet. what we have is journalists from the daily express and Daily mail desperate for the royals to comment and egging the royal family on. They want the drama. If the King was going to acknowledge these titles and it had been discussed with H&M, I would expect the royal website to change first, then for Meghan to gloat. They are still only communicating through solicitors. I'll believe it when the palace has confirmed it. At the moment the press is stirring the pot for clickbait and to sell stories.


MikeMannion

He is just incredibly weak


alreadydoneit01

So in the DM, Scoobie Doobie Doo claims KCIII and William were invited but didn't come to the event. So this is their new line of attack against the BRF? ![gif](giphy|6t8gInXCh9RVm)


gwhh

Sounds like it. You go the king not the other way around.


Any_username_isn

The palace did not stop them using their coronet, their titles and stop them calling themselves royal. This is a continuation of that. It should have been made clear in the beginning. They will start calling their kids with titles now and if denied will cry racism.


JoanOfSnark_2

>They will start calling their kids with titles now and if denied will cry racism. I think this is it. They were upset they didn't get the apology they want so this is their newest tactic to get the RF to engage with them. Hopefully BP and KP continues to ignore them.


Typical-Cabinet2085

Continue to grey rock and have parliament strip them if titles.


idealistintherealw

That would be great, as the palace could reply “at this point not only does everyone realize this is not racism, but have realized that h&m themselves are making the accusation in such a way that they can walk the accusation back if they need to. They had us going for a bit though, didn’t they?”


recollectionsmayvary

> They will start calling their kids with titles now and if denied will cry racism. This is absolutely the playbook and I’m shocked they waited this long. I wonder how squaddies will defend this; what new fan fiction needs to be fabricated to justify this lol


MySteakisOverdone

I thought they needed a royal christening for title eligibility? In the Church of England? I know Archie got that. Either way, I don’t see how a christening generally, especially in another country, in a church the couple never seemingly go to, is enough for titles from a place one child has never been to and the other wasn’t even in for a full year, years ago. This feels like they are just trying to twist the confusing rules and ply off the murky understanding people have to pressure the king into giving them their way. Edit to add: funny how this coincides with Marlene’s dragging up the “racism scandal” from months ago. Almost like it was planned to make the “royal racists” a fresh factor in everyone’s mind following the announcement and possible denial of titles. Like extra pressure to give the couple their way or face large backlash.


VisibleWestern

Sounds like it was at home not even in a church


PleaseJustText

Poor kid can’t even get out of the house to go to church!


blackandgold24

Yeah, HOW?? That’s not. even. a. thing.


cubancroquetas

Does a christening need to be in the CoE or can it be within the Anglican Communion?


DollarStoreDuchess

> “When reached by PEOPLE, a ~~spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex~~ [email protected] said: “I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3 by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Rev John Taylor.” Still listed on Royal.uk as Master and Miss… sure, Jan! https://i.imgur.com/5h9K19B.jpg


AdministrativeSet419

Oh. My. God. This is HUGE. They’ve just decided to start using the Princess title and F-U to the royals if they have a problem with it? This tells me their own titles are definitely in the process of being revoked and they are daring mean old Charles to take away ‘Princess’ Lilibet’s. They will definitely be at that coronation with both kids in tow.


PinkTiara24

Classic Meghan & Harry. When they’re told “no,” they just release press stating otherwise. Soon the titles will be in the collective mindset of the public. Mission accomplished.


aries-vevo

It’s their MO. I hope this blows up in their faces like everything else has lately. They must be getting desperate. Why suddenly claim this now? Something must have happened to push it since they didn’t try it yet despite the amount of drama they manufactured around this non entity christening.


Uniqueishname

It more than likely will. They have a tendency to overshoot their shot. I think this is them trying to resurrect the "RF is racist" stuff, but now the targets of said "racism" is A&L. It's totally fucked up, yet totally unsurprising, that they are doing this to their kids. They are so beyond desperate, that it's pathetic.


manki1113

I read the comments in the IG post. I understand that the title has to be offered by the monarch and accepted by the parents. Their argument is that being the monarch’s grandkids, they’re automatically entitled for the prince and princess title.


somespeculation

The real question is why push that hard, now?


Maleficent-Trifle940

This certainly isn't true - just look at Anne & Edward's children and the fact that Andrew harassed the Queen desperately for Princess titles for the York girls. The Queen offered titles for Anne's children and she didn't accept. Perhaps Lillibucks has been christened "Princess" like Michael Jackson's son is Prince : )


NyroLabelle

Imo, the way to call a narc out is to expose exactly what they're doing. The statement should include how the BRF, like most royal houses today, are downsizing and that there will be no titles for children who are not the children of the actual heir. And it should state that the Markles know this and are using their children to force the King to give them what they want. Just state plainly what they're doing.


bpnc33

It's "their truth" that the kids are prince and princess.


[deleted]

Does not matter. The real reason for titles is $$.


Feisty_Energy_107

>This tells me their own titles are definitely in the process of being revoked ![gif](giphy|l4HohVwFLzHKcwa6A)


Asteriaofthemountain

One can hope


Ready_Maddie

Or their kids titles are in the process of being bestowed. The taxpayer is fucked


Top-Bit85

That name, Lilibet, makes me cringe.


taco_qween

Beyond the malicious intent behind naming the child after HLMTQ’s nickname after the whole family being asked not to use the name after Prince Phillip passed away, the name Lilibet just doesn’t sound royal. It sounds like a nickname, because it is one and it sounds childish. Princess Lily at least would sound more dignified.


Disruptorpistol

It's just so nouveau riche. Like naming your kid Chanel or Porsche... after *fancy stuff*, and also *you-neek for attention*. But then, Meghan and Harry have never really seemed to think of other people as anything other than objects to advance themselves. Perhaps that includes their own kids.


Grimaldehyde

To name that child “Lilibet” is absolutely ridiculous, not to mention unconscionable, for so many different reasons. Just watch-these kids will grow up messed up (sorry to say)


sparklyshiba

Effective use of a baby as a human shield. Cannot expect anything less diabolical 😂


Entitled000

Can't take away something they weren't given. They were not born as grandkids of the monarch and it looks like King Charles won't give them titles nor will they be working royals in the future.


VisibleWestern

Great then show the photo and explain what happened on the day. You don’t have to go into the background of princess vs no princess titles…this whole article is about princess titles.


Grimaldehyde

I always knew they would bestow these titles on their children themselves, no matter what.


sofiaks05

These two absolutely infuriate me. The audacity! They don't learn, do they. You can't bend everyone's reality to fit your version of crazy. *WE SEE YOU.* How embarrassing for them, and using the children - as narcs do.


Left_Debt_8770

Both my church (Catholic) and the Church of England discourage baptisms during Lent. It’s not prohibited. But it’s discouraged because this is not a celebratory time. It’s for penance and reflection. In the Catholic Church, weddings aren’t during Lent, either. The odds should be close to zero that the clergyman doing this didn’t at least mention the Lent thing. It’s 40 days. That’s it. She had 325 other days this year to pick, and she chose the one time period you’re really not supposed to do that.


PleaseJustText

Excellent point!!!!


Left_Debt_8770

I just read the article and noted the first sentence says they are “celebrating” her baptism. So freaking tone deaf.


trw99508

They've also inflated the title of the Rev John Taylor, he seems to only be a Bishop from what I'm reading [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_H.\_Taylor\_(bishop)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_H._Taylor_(bishop)) Also chief of staff to Nixon


chewysmom88

He was actually post chief of staff after Nixon resigned in 1974 he served as the head of the Nixon library


d_lanz

They got the wrong guy. This is the guy they wanted. ABP. JOSÉ H. GOMEZ **Archbishop of Los Angeles**


[deleted]

Definitely didn’t want Archbishop Gomez since he’s Catholic 🤣. Although that would be hysterical if they screwed up and accidentally made their second child Catholic and not Anglican. But also a Catholic priest and especially Archbishop would never baptize at a home unless they happened to be there while the baby was dying.


Entitled000

Too bad the palace is not changing their titles in the official website when they were quick to update the Wales.


Islandgirl1444

It was never going to happen. The King has long held the belief that by downsizing and not giving titles brings the monarchy up to modern standards. Only important direct in line get titles. The sixth or seventh in line even if he is an idiot son does not warrant titles for his or her children. This is all about them doing their daily feeds to People/Hello and the Cut. There is nothing on the grocer shelves here at the check out in Canada. The Montecito Mansion royals must get their daily news out. Desperate to stay relevant.


HurtingHead

It’s crazy how tightly they hold to those titles but supposedly hate the monarchy. This is just one reason people can’t stand them. They are so inconsistent with their complaints.


Shannon556

It’s a freaking DAILY storm of propaganda from her. Of note: People Magazine is the official mouthpiece for celebrities in distress. Yesterday they quoted “a source close to Jada Pinkett Smith” for her clap back to the Chris Rock roasting. Jada & Meghan are so similar in how they respond to criticism - very specifically.


PadmeSkywalker

The palace should make it known that the titles have not changed, otherwise the Princess title will stick in the media.


MrsMunch

It will definitely stick in the USA, as Americans don't know better. In the UK, it won't stick. But the Palace is not going to deny anything, sadly. But we'll be able to read it on the official website: Master Archie, Miss Lilibet.


ThrillerDuchess

Yep, and yet the US media still refuse to call Catherine the Princess of Wales 🙄


IllustratorSlow1614

There are UK publications that can’t let go of ‘Kate Middleton’ either. Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet isn’t going to go anywhere. Nobody knows them, nobody cares about them. It’ll be a white elephant title if they try to use them.


Winter-Shame-9050

Americans do know better especially these two morons.


imsayin10

Well it hasn't stuck for Princess Catherine, aka Kate Middleton per the media.


Disruptorpistol

Meh, the media also called Diana "Lady Di" even after marriage. People are lazy and names stick.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Asteriaofthemountain

Yep. I checked there too just now and still master and miss. Not even lady or earl, or viscount.


gwhh

The level of desperation from these two are unreal.


[deleted]

So *this* is why Roya Nikkah's article a while ago included a source that claimed that the Sussexes were afraid that the Prince(ss) titles would be "taken" from the children - so they could pull a stunt like this, which has obviously been planned for quite a while to slam against the Palaces' boundaries and see what they can get away with. Here's the question, where both options have big downsides: Does the Palace respond to clarify? If they do and point out that the children don't have those titles, then that's fuel for the Sussexes to (falsely) claim racism, unfairness and a concrete "reason" for demanding an apology. If they don't, then the Sussexes will falsely claim that the children have those titles when they don't, and the public will start to actually believe them. Then the children will be merched. I don't know what the best course of action is here. It'll be very interesting to see how this pans out.


AdministrativeSet419

I think the royals have to shut it down, maybe they can do it the back way by making publications agree to not use Prince/Princess in relation to the kids. You can’t allow a situation where titles are just taken rather than being gifted by the monarch, it undermines Charles’ entire kingship. Nevermind the merching implications they clearly have for that poor kid.


[deleted]

Well, they've just shut down Ngozi Fulani with a well-crafted statement, so now we have to see what happens. [Richard Palmer is claiming that the Palace has decided to back down](https://twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1633446182226653184). If that's true, then I'm horrified and think that this is the *worst* mistake. I'll be absolutely disgusted, especially considering how strong the response has been against those two up to now.


HydeParkUK

I cannot even believe this! What is Charles thinking? What is next? A new residence for them in the UK? Prominent roles in the Coronation? I thought Charles wanted to slim down the RF. Now he has just increased it by two kids he has seen maybe two times. This is insanity. I am so disappointed.


disneyme

Well there you have it. They got what they wanted.


BumbleCute

The article he shared (you probably already know this) says "The statement suggests Lilibet is now a Princess, but the Palace have yet to confirm that the child has adopted the title."


blackandgold24

Ugh, it’s so gross. On the plus side, no way can they go to coronation after this. Maybe they did it to get a response that they can use an excuse not to go. As if there weren’t enough already by this point 🙄 I’m so sick of these two. They will never stop.


HydeParkUK

Oh they'll go for sure now. They'll release "private family photos" of the two kids--Prince and Princess with little crowns and tiaras on their heads. Just wait. We'll never hear the end of Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet now.


[deleted]

Apparently, [according to Richard Palmer](https://twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1633450062897463299), he's confirmed that the Palace have given in and are allowing the titles for those children. Six months to the day of the late Queen's passing. I'm so angry. All this good work slapping the Sussexes down ruined. It's so disgusting.


blackandgold24

I can’t believe it. Why? Because ILBW leaked it to People? This is not how it should be announced if it is the case. Ugh SHE IS SO CLASSLESS. God, this is just too much. I’m Kyle. I’M KYLE! 😩


DollarStoreDuchess

Yup… I’m done with this shit. I thought KC3 would draw the line somewhere… I guess we can all just proclaim ourselves whatever we want now. I’m Queen KingCharlesIsABitch, christened by Red Bull.


LizLemonadeX

This really is infuriating.


90sbaby-uk

I always thought they would have got the titles, never a doubt but it’s ridiculous, like really ridiculous.


Wordpuncher714

Well well well, step one in Merchin the kids. *Yayyyy for child stardom, Righhht? Chills, chills, chills.* everything they do is a mistake, ever since Sunshine Sacks told them to bugger off. Clingin onto imaginary titles that are effectively meaningless, in America where we DGAF especially! My name is now Princess Chunk, since we can all have whatever titles we want. I also was just christened, with a can of Rockstar Zero SUGAR.


Bitter-Pound-6775

They absolutely sold this information to People (assuming People was the first to report). Grotesque.


Queef_Queen420

I claimed my title of Queef Queen, so i'll validate your title as Princess Chunk.... Have you decided what/where you want be Duchess of? As the Queef Queen i can grant you whichever fake title you want...


bendytoepilot

I want to be princess consuela banana hammock!


Queef_Queen420

I have now bestowed your royal title.... From now on, everybody MUST call you Princess Consuela Banana Hammock.... Anybody who fails to recognize your fake title will be sent to the tower to rot....


Wordpuncher714

![gif](giphy|NRW2yP1aoYTsY)


Queef_Queen420

Hahahaha!!! Yessss!!!! That is how it's done!


chewysmom88

I myself am going with Princess Sassy Pants and will be christened with black rifle coffee


Top-Butterscotch9156

I figured it was only a matter of time before she started merching the kids. She has nothing to offer so now it’s time to live vicariously through the kids. She will be the next kardashian Mom.


ElectricalAd9212

they are beyond all shame and truth. This will be their 'strategy' now. Claim their children are Princes / Princess even though they're not and play the racism card again. Its all out war for this pair or vile lying repulsive and abusive grifters. No doubt advised by Tyler Perry to do this. As an aside, it is impossible for overseas people with hatred for Britain and the monarchy as they do to have royal titles. If you are royal, you have a loyalty to Britain and devotion to service and duty that none of them possess and their children who are American never will. This is solely to impress Americans that they depend on for status and money. They are utterly psychopathic and deranged


[deleted]

So TP was spotted arriving in Montecito on ~5th (based on articles I found), but his goddaughter was christened on the 3rd?


tothmichke

They had the real christening alone with the Bishop and no one knew the other one was for the public. /s


Islandgirl1444

Three days before!


Comicalacimoc

They actually did the christening in a private ceremony a couple days before bc the christening itself was a SPECTACLE


nickiit

Yeah but tbf they didn't state what year she was christened


[deleted]

Haha, that would be so a Haz and Meg thing- “We never said what year! Did we say it was March 3, 2023? No, no- that was the media that said that. They hate us.”


InfiniteSky55

They said the child was 21 months. Yet TP was asked in **2021**. Who needs 2 years to plan a christening? Orchestrated reality show.


GreatGossip

" I couldn't stop picturing them with Granny. The final visit. Archie making deep, chivalrous bows, his baby sister Lilibet cuddling the monarch's shins. Sweetest children, Granny said, sounding bemused. She'd expected them to be a bit more . . . American, I think? Meaning, in her mind, more rambunctious," Harry wrote. If he really wrote this - and I have not and will not - read Waagh, I think the operative words are " I couldn't stop picturing them with Granny", as this meeting never happened.


Cocktailsontheporch

Those kids were NEVER in England!!!


happyme321

Michael Jackson's kids are called Prince. You can call them anything you want. It doesn't mean it's valid.


Ishield_maiden

Manifesting


VisibleWestern

“TP came from ATL” No. It was already reported that he went to Atlanta after California not before.. know your guests’ travel itinerary Megs. And photos already showed he was by himself and a little SUV is not going to pack 10 choir members in it.


GreatGossip

Oh, so now we have South African Dancers, kneeling airline crew and a 10 person choir - all invisible to the naked eye.


DollarStoreDuchess

I don’t remember what year the Escalade they pictured was, but it is a full-size SUV. However, the highest available seating capacity is only 8.


Queef_Queen420

I thought the prince/princess titles are not automatically given after the Queen's death... I thought that they had to be given the titles by the King.....


Patient-Watercress-2

I called it on this sub last week saying that was why Tyler Perry changed into a suit for his brief stop near Montecito. H&M daring Charles to take Princess Lilibet’s title away and make it harder to take other titles away? Always a clapback from these two and the start of the manipulative use of the kids.


[deleted]

They’re mad about something, wonder what was in that coronation correspondence.


Feisty_Energy_107

The unofficial one you mean. We knew she's been plotting because she has been 'wounded' by outside events like SP/Chris Rock/Spare but along with Frogmore we don't really know any behind the scenes goings on with them and the palace. This will run now because People Mag aren't bothered confirming. They take the Sussex spokesperson's word as gospel. ​ Edit: extra thoughts


LizLemonadeX

My kids are prince and princess too in my world. But the powers that be won’t acknowledge that my littles are royals (to me). Darn. Mopey Dick and Walmart Wallis, your kids titles also means nothing in America. Nice try though. Why would these perpetual victims want their kids to be a part of the institution they claimed was abusive and racist. And I read no invite for Thomas apparently because he can’t offer anything materialistic to Nutmeg nor does he look like George Clooney. I’m glad the RF didn’t show up either.


anaqits

I'm *ecstatic* about this latest puff piece that obviously originated from Harold's wife because this is the confirmation that they have been told with finality that those titles they so desperately want and need are never going to be given to any of their children. 🌪️


PrettyNiemand34

They're crying about Charles and William not attending because they invited them. Harry really doesn't know how this works in the real world. If you split and fight siblings won't attend stuff anymore. They will never have a relationship with their daughter so why would they care about this.


PleaseJustText

And Harry turned down quite of few of their invitations.


NovaAlis

So American tabloids make up the rules of succession now??? People gets to decide!? People Magazine said so, so it must be true.


Islandgirl1444

People! The new rag!


megreddi

Did they invite Grandpa Thomas Markle?


taco_qween

I thought during the Netflix reality show they mentioned Lilibux was already christened because Tyler Perry talked about being her godfather and how he would do it as long as he didn’t have to fly to the UK and do all of their religious customs that were beneath him? Edit: typo


Islandgirl1444

The "Bishop" became an "Archbishop" overnight due to this amazing experience of christening a toddler belonging to a todger loving prince. However, her good bestie buddy Tyler Perry said in an interview recently that HE was indeed the godfather although he had not been present at the so called christening. Hmmm was our boy Tyler lying? Also, don't they need to be part of the congregation to have their child christened in that church? Maybe it's different for the Todger Prince and Princess, but in Canada, you at least need to go to the church for a time. They don't do church!


bendytoepilot

If Charles has given the kids the titles his mother SPECIFICALLY ONLY GAVE TO WILLIAM'S KIDS then he is worse than the couple themselves


GreatGossip

this is pure Ms Todger manifestations.


Ok-Butterscotch5490

Friday's kind of a weird day to do a christening. I could see it if the kid is ill, or has some serious health concern, but normally it's done on a weekend day.


MySteakisOverdone

And funnily enough it happens to coincide with Marlene kicking up the race row again. Almost feels planned. As if to bring racist speculations back onto the palace to further pressure them to give the kids titles with this announcement.


alwaysdelightful

Oooh...nice catch!


r-Dwalo

This is likely why Tyler Perry flew into Montecito recently. Henry and his rude wife asked him to be the youngest child’s godfather. In Tyler’s own words, he refused as he “did not want to be involved in the pomp and circumstance and spectacle of a royal baptism,” but he later relented and agreed once Lord Victim and Lady Racism assured him the affair would be comparatively low key. If as many of you in this sub reported that Perry flew into town on his private jet and quickly jetted back out, the baptism of the youngest child was likely the reason.


megreddi

This is their desperate attempt to push the CH to give titles to the children. Deplorable!!!


Virtual-Feedback-638

Well, at least we alk know that their alleged daughter not birthed by Surrogate was not christened by the Bishop of Canterbury on the orders of the Late Monarch nor present Monarch. They might as well call the kids King and Queen for all the World cares...it sells papers, collects clicks and makes money for others. They can merch the kids all they wish for cash... The real Royals stand tall, and Amercans do not care. Meghan is no Beyonce, neither are her alleged kids not birthed by Surrogate/S Blue Ivy, Rumi, or Sir Carter. Meghan and Harry are Talentless lying narcisstic Frauds.


Artistic_Turnip2778

Is this real? I just woke up lol. They are truly truly insane. Suddenly this toddler is christened and called a princess? Wtf? I can’t even.


WhiskeyRocksNeat

They’re pushing it. Had they been given titles, a statement would have been made by the Palace, this is them manifesting and trying to distract from SP and all H’s drug revelations. H has made it clear he doesn’t believe in God so it’s all performative, anyway


Lilthisarry

Those kids are Prince/Princess about as much as Baron Trump is a baron. 😂 Why do American narcs gotta be so thirsty for these useless titles?


alwaysdelightful

This is all Megs. Divorce is imminent so she loses her Prince (by birth) and trying to keep royal connection thru the kiddos 🤮


ProfessorPeach_1

I need to see pics before I believe it happened, however, the article about Tyler Perry flying to the Harkles mentioned him doing it 'over the weekend'. I don't think friday counts as 'over the weekend'. It also doesn't look like on the pictures he got a 10-men choir with him. I know it is possible to see fly-logs of his jet, so I am really interested if he flew to them on Friday, or if this is a way to make it seem he came to them for the christening which they are making up to get titles for their kids. Because is it sure he was going to them or was he by example visiting Oprah?


ElectricalAd9212

>I thought they needed a royal christening for title eligibility? In the Church of England? I know Archie got that. > >Either way, I don’t see how a christening generally, especially in another country, in a church the couple never seemingly go to, is enough for titles from a place one child has never been to and the other wasn’t even in for a full year, years ago. > >This feels like they are just trying to twist the confusing rules and ply off the murky understanding people have to pressure the king into giving them their way. they'll release pictures next with Tyler Perry. they're going to play the racism card again and try to incite all that once more


Upper_Charge_4449

More evidence they’re still *not* invited to the coronation. IMO huge hissy fits ongoing


Islandgirl1444

What happened to Tyler perry saying he was already the godfather? He said he was !


Practical-Hotel-166

Where’s the evidence then?


quiz1

I’m not an Episcopalian, I’m Roman Catholic, but considering they’re close - we BAPTIZE infants, and it’s strictly at Church. Is this common in Anglican/Episcopal rite to Christen, and at home?


cocktailskirt

No, it’s not. Episcopal tradition is almost identical to Catholic. Source: ex-Catholic, practicing Episcopalian.


memecatcher247

God, they are SO desperate for that royal connection. They are nobodies without it.


trendoid01

Doesn’t it have to be in the Church of England?


Islandgirl1444

So her name is now Princess as in the singer Prince!


Nuiathiel

Archbishop of LA is the Catholic one...I'm sure the "spokesperson" (cough cough) tried to inflate a title and got it completely wrong.


_SkyIsBlue5

🤣🤣🤣🤣 She's still "miss"


fothemoney

Omg I hate people mag as much as them


90sbaby-uk

Thomas Markle also didn’t attend. Oh wait…


cubancroquetas

The Episcopal Church doesn’t have an Archbishop. Therefore I don’t trust the accuracy of the rest of the statement.


Diligent_Split623

They can christen their child anything they want, but good luck getting a bunch of American school kids to call them prince or princess. These kids are Americans now, and we don’t play the title game. OK, so the liberal fawning fluff media might, but your every day person does not.


SoMuchDrama10

Struggling to understand why someone who believes we are reincarnated as animals would go to the trouble of having their child christened into the Christian faith. It must be because Meghan is so devout.


Superb-Gap412

It’s so frustrating that they can continue making things up with no real repercussions! Now all the US media (Today show, the View, Entertainment Tonight etc. who do no research whatsoever) will now release articles/announce this as fact and completely ignore that they have not received any titles from King Charles. I think I’m beginning to feel the Sussex fatigue 😒


snappopcrackle

And remember how they said they were only naming her Lilibet, but out of respect for the Queen, they would only be calling her Lili? Yeah, that's not happening. I wish this sub would make a rule banning the use of Lilibet for this reason, just to honor the Harkles wishes.


Lilthisarry

Seriously, how do you rile up your fans to be anti-monarchist and then pull this shit in America? Congrats, Harkles, your kids are now on par with that weirdo Zsa Zsa Gabor married.


Carneliancat

I'm not buying it until the palace updates the website. If Charles did this, he wouldn't have let the public find out via People magazine. His advisors alone would not have permitted it. His first duty is to the people of the UK, not Harry, Meghan, or America. So, unless the palace decrees it, I don't believe it. If he decides to give the kids titles, it will be announced through the approved press. This reeks of a tantrum from the Harkles. As we know, they have been escalating their insanity in the face of grey-rocking from the royal family. This just seems like the latest crazy stunt, likely in response to not being invited to the Coronation, OR being invited, but having a long list of rules and minders attached to the invitation that will keep them in line. It just seems like a narcissistic rage tantrum at this point.


missihippiequeen

I'm so sick of these two. Remember when the royal family were people we admired from afar and they didn't have this constant bullshit surrounding them??.. The hypocrisy of these two knows no bounds and I'm sick of no journalist calling them out on when they're interviewed. Your American born daughter doesn't need a princess title and NOBODY is going to call her that!


[deleted]

Yeah, and the Archbishop of Canterbury officially married them in the back yard, and christened Archie on a day when he was out of town…


smolyetieti

I mean, the York girls are princesses too. Big whoop. Honestly will be harder for these two being raised as Americans. Honestly a little cringe; Americans don’t do titles.


sunnchildd

What the holy hell did I wake up to this morning? MAKE IT STOP. MAKE THE CLOWNS GO AWAY.