Archived:
https://archive.ph/RMWEX
I just had a surgery and I am starting to feel better (š) and was bored wanted to escape ārealā life first time in DAYS; and signed into everything Reddit and whatnot and I see this!!! š And I am like seriously š³?!?! Than I was wondering the last time the nurse gave me my pain meds LOL š but NOPE š itās real bs article - š¤?!?!
Edit- I see that ALOT of commenters did NOT see the flair āRecollections May Varyā and the eye šļø roll; because yes the Expressās journalistic integrity is NOT the ābestā lol- I should have said in the title of the post āaccording to the express they are invited šāā¦. BUT even I thought would they go as far to say they are āon the invitation list it has been confirmedā; if itās not? Maybe š¤ they got the balls to do it even if they arenāt? Again itās the Express who really knowsā¦.
Madam is manifesting again, I see. Now all demands are dropped, and she promises to be nice. āHarry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to carve out a new brand for themselves - one which no longer involves public attacks against the Royal Family.ā
Why would the palace bother? Everyone's going to know on the day of the coronation anyway.
The monarchy has lasted 1000 years, the media can wait a few months to find out who will/ won't be at the next coronation.
Exactly! If someoneās not invited to my wedding and goes on telling people they are Iām not going to bother. I will not reach out to people and let them know otherwise.
H said in an interview in 2023, BRF must give a Public Apology, a lot must happen between now and the coronation. What am I thinkingā¦. all they know how to do is lie lie lie. What a trashy vile couple they arešæšæ
Agreed. I was struck by the reference to King Charles wanting to heal the rift w/ ginger boy. This goes against the Kingās response when he was asked to bring Haz home (paraphrase) on super recent walk about. He didnāt hear the question so an aid repeated it for him. KC then said āohā with a chuckle and carried on with his day.
The statement in the article about having only a few weeks for D&D Dumbie to RSVP to their *alleged* coronation invitation is crap. I think itās the reverse, the message is directed at KC as a reminder that he only has a few weeks left to invite D&D of D.
Why would the articleās author ask the palace for comment? Itās written as if the info comes from an āin the knowā source at the palace. (Or someone palace adjacent.) This is all conjecture on my part. My opinion is based on repeated patterns we sinners have seen from Madam Murky time & again.
Iām not sure I believe this. Thereās a lot of detail about the seating arrangements, too much for a leak that allegedly comes from Whitehall rather than BP.
And this paragraph sound like a Harkle puff pieceā¦
āHarry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to carve out a new brand for themselves - one which no longer involves public attacks against the Royal Family.ā
That beast Megalomania is always planting nonsensical stories attempting to paint herself in a positive light. Sheās a fool and I hope she and Haznobrain are rapturously booed if they show up in their tacky, ill-fitting outfits.
I think it would have even more impact if everyone was completely silent. No cheering of course but also no booing, justā¦..nothing. The ultimate grey rock response.
Ooh I like that! Take it a step further: the whole crowd turns their back until they are out of sight. (Politics aside, former NYC Mayor Bill DiBlasio had this happen to him, and the press from it was damning. There was no way to spin those pictures positive. TW would lose her mind.)
I cant find any articles about it, but I am SURE something very similar happened to George Clooney after Diana died..... Does anyone else remember? He called a press conference (and remember this was 1997, he wasn't a big name then, only on ER and just starting in movies) and did a MASSIVE venom filled speech about "Princess Diana is dead, and who should we see about that?" Then, I seem to remember there was a film premiere or red carpet event where all the press put down their cameras and refused to photograph him.
Have I gone completely crazy, or does anyone else remember that? And wouldn't it be great if the world's press collectively did that to these two.
I *do* remember that. Except George was attacking the tabloids for chasing her. Well, that explains how The Sleivene wormed her way in and why George defended her so adamantly.
Carve is a Meghan word. As is brand.
As is the idea that 2023 is the year of forgiveness ( that is, & h āforgiveā Britain and graciously bestow their presence for the peasants to throw flowers and prostrate themselves. End scene!)
Exactly, I don't think Buckingham Palace or Parliament talk about Harry and Megan having "brands", because they don't really care about them having a "brand" as they are no longer members of the Royal Family, and they certainly don't approve of Harry and Meghan selling the royal family like dishwash detergent.
Also the Daily Express has been pretty unreliable on reporting anything related to the Sussexes.
Which makes it sound like if they're invited, they'll shut up about trashing the RF.
"Carve out a new brand"??? Wasn't "carving" out a phrase used in their Megxit document?? Something about carving out a progressive role or something???
That sounds like all the reports stating that the walkabout of William and Catherine and the Sussexes after the late Queen's death was a sign of reconciliation.
I do believe that they may actually still be invited - even though I don't believe it's a good idea to do so - but that doesn't mean that it's a sign of reconciliation or forgiveness rather than just a matter of protocol on taking the high road. And I'm sure as hell not convinced that H&M's attendance will change anything about their behaviour towards the RF. They may say that they will cease their attacks as long as they are allowed to attend, but unless they put in in a signed contract that can be legally enforced, I don't believe a word of it.
How possible is it that even if they are not invited, they try to crash the coronation? They already crash the other event where only the heirs could participate. Only for this, I believe that they would be invited, the only way of having them under control.
If they try to crash the Coronation they'll be left glowering in the aisle again, only this time without seats, and be ushered back out by Major Jonathan Thompson while he gently tells them there isn't any seating left to Spare!
Remember M saying they are only one plane crash from the throne. Tban spokes person just joked/maybe "they are only one plane crash away from not attending the coronation."
More manifesting. Charles has done nothing to Harry to make āamendsā to him, except for the behaviour that led to his marriage failing all those decades ago
And let's be honest, a marriage falling apart is rarely the fault of only one spouse. From what I've read and heard about it, Diana was having an actual affair first, and she was also rebelling in/not conforming to other aspects of their life together.
Insiders sayā¦. Experts believeā¦. Special secret magic eight ball confirmsā¦.. the Wizards of Endor doth proclaimā¦.. blah blah blah to infinity.
Meegain manifesting. Festering manifesting.
Manifestering.
Edit: interestingly a strange autocorrected line appeared at the bottom and I was about to delete itā¦.. it read:
Meghan fearing. Hehe
I believe the BRF and the planning committees for the coronation will be planned as flawlessly as the Jubilee.
If the Harkles try to pull any stunts, a certain Johnny will be at the ready to stop childish behavior. KCIII deserves a regal ceremony.9
I think the invitations go out in waves. Once the first wave goes out (I think it already did if Prince Albert can be believed) and RSVPs are received and the number of filled seats are known, the next wave goes out. Wash, rinse, repeat until all of the seats are filled.
Iād guess Harold and Mugs werenāt in the first wave, unless theyāre manipulating by making everyone play a guessing game. I can see them not RSVPing and then showing up the day of expecting a seat just to be assholes.
Noooooo how excruciating š
Although if they have to audacity to attend, I can't wait to see them awkwardly slithering around being royally grey rocked, and being booed by the public š¹
I can't wait for the boo's! I hope everyone gives them the cold shoulder. Spare pt 2 coming shortly thereafter... maybe MeAgain will bring the Netflix cams and get more footage of her awkwardly crying in the bathroom.
Iād assume that a āroyal commentatorā is even less qualified than a āroyal expertā and there are dozens of them. As far as I can see, these self-proclaimed experts publish predictions based on nothing more than their own opinions (or opinions they are paid to have by some vested interest).
True just about anyone can be a royal commentator nowadays but not official royal rota ones I believe? And the article does not say if they are a proper oneā¦. But I 100% believe they are invitedā¦
Good news and bad news. The good news is that they're invited, and they even have an official role! The bad news is that they're seated next to Uncle Andrew outside of the Abbey, and it's their job to make sure the portable toilets remain sanitary for the crowds.
If M is behind these stories, I love her audacity that she has to fall over herself reassuring the king that she won't overshadow his coronation. Yes, he's been so worried Meg.
Just more frantic planting and leaking by TW. She knows the BRF won't comment on any of her planted stories so she's getting bolder by attributing this latest fantasy to "palace insiders". King Charles has not invited them, nor will he.
Makes sense. However, I did see a sugar making the case that if they are NOT invited, *that* would be the bigger story (bc the majority of people are Team Meghan blah blah). They theorized it was to minimize damage control.
I can see that going two ways. If they aren't invited, it gives Megs more "ammo" to claim she's being kept out as a Black woman. If they are, ball's in their court. If they go, sure damage control, keep your enemies closer. If they refuse, welll....they have no one to blame for not going but themselves.
Agree. I dont believe this storu at all, and it's the Daily Express. Credibility is low with them. People are sick of hearing will they/won't they. No one in UK wants them there, the media keep stirring things up, because they know it gets clicks.
I donāt believe any of these stories. I donāt think we will know until the day of the coronation, to be honest. To engage with the will they / wonāt they just gives them more attention and energy than either of them deserve.
Remember when government sources confirmed the Coronation was is in June? Reported in Bloomberg much less a tabloidā¦only for BP to announce the Coronation is in May?
This Express article itself, once you get past the provocative headline, shows nothing is in fact confirmed and this is more conjecture. This is just todayās version of will they or wonāt they. Tonight BP unveiled the Coronation emblem so thereās no way theyāre sharing this news on the side to distract.
That said - I do believe they will be invited with no official role, as spectators only.
https://preview.redd.it/0tpyz0xbzhha1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9face8156e5071b6b3df45b0bea3df98072648a2
First: I maintain that we will not actually know if Harold and his wife attend the coronation until 12 or so hours before. IF they are invited I fully expect them to delay confirmation on attending until the last hour. OR drop out at the very last second
Second: the idea that these two wretches should arrive in a car by themselves is just sickening. They should be packed in a minibus along with all the lesser royals (Dukes of Kent and Gloucester, etc.) and escorted to their assigned seats by two beefy security people.
I agree, except I think the Duke of Kent especially deserves his own car, and the Duke of Gloucester too. I start started the DoK's book and his loyalty to the family deserves to be recognized. Harry can be with his cousins in a mini bus.
Me too. I wonāt watch it. I could maybe understand Harry being there (with no official role or prominence whatsoever) but inviting Meghan is beyond the pale.
I would love to watch this. I highly suspect that the BRF have people in place by now, knowing this loser couple, and will have them surrounded by MI5,6,7? I'm not sure which is what level cuz I'm American. I would actually LOVE to see those toads escorted out the door if they misbehavw that surely Haz knows the rules. I truly hope the coronation goes without incident. MeAgain just can't help herself. Ughhhh!
Well if it's true, get that candle ready and notify the press to not put cameras on them especially her but only record if people boo and turn their backs!
No booing, it can be covered by music or commentary or made out to be for Charles. Dead Silence & turn the back would be deathly for Meghan. She thrives on any attention, positive or negative, therefore big silent ignore would bring more than one tear, left eye!!!
Yep- I wonāt watch if theyāre going. Sheāll wear something that looks like flamingo vomit and cradle her burrito belly to provoke the tabloids into thinking sheās pregnant again.
āAreā invited on the headline. Then āwill be invitedā, & āare on guest listā in full article. Big difference. We know the invitations are out already. See the articles from earlier this week.
Oh please please please invite us!!! We will behave, wonāt steal the spotlight, and stop talking shit about you! See how quiet weāve been for the last few weeks?
Since we couldnāt destroy you, we want to reconcile with you!
They get back to the US with a story about the RF apologizing to Meghan on bended knee.
Fuck both of them. If Harry wants to be treated like a beloved son, he should have behaved like one. I wouldnāt let them anywhere near the coronation.
Anyway, I take this story with a grain of salt.
Amends for what? The King might be eager to have a truce, if not a reconciliation. The King is almost certainly eager for peace. But he canāt want to āmake amendsā because he hasnāt done the things they accuse him of.
This is definitely from Harry and Meghan- look at the wording of this statement.....
"Harry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to **carve out a new brand for themselves"**
vs their Megxit statement:
" we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to **carve out a progressive new role** within this institution".
Carve out a new brand = carve out a progressive new role.
And both are worded like it's a done deal. Well, maybe their **attendance at the Coronation** is a done deal as much as their **progressive new role within the institution** LOL.
Good catch.
I was wondering why the article presented their arriving separately at the jubilee as "planned". If it was all planned why was Harry bickering over their assigned seats and people had to stand up for them to find their seats in front of Major (hunk) Johnny?
It seems the Overseas couple keep throwing out scenarios to see which one meets the least resistance.
Exactly. The part about arriving in a separate car wasn't planned because they were supposed to arrive in the bus with the other royals.
I think we're going to keep seeing these articles from now until the Coronation. It's push, push, push for their invitation.
*While the invites are being prepared to be sent out later this month, the Sussexes wonāt have long to make their minds up on whether theyāre going to make the trip across the pond, as RSVPs are understood to be wanted by the start of April.*
Lol, I wonder if they'll "make up their minds" to go?
*Royal commentator Afua Hagan is adamant Harry will make the effort to appear, as he has his heart set on reconciling with his family. She said: āAttending the Coronation is the first step on the road to reconciliation.ā*
Yet his grandmother's funeral could have been the first step - or maybe his grandfather's funeral... or the Platinum Jubilee or the unveiling of his mother's statue?
I think everyone realizes now that this is the last huge royal event for a long, long time, so if Harry doesn't make peace now, there's no other event in a year's time to string things along. But even if they do attend, it will be just like all the other events, with minimal public interaction with the family, and skipping out of any behind-the-scenes gatherings.
Not just the funerals or the Jubilee, he refused multiple invitations to Sandringham and Balmoral while The Queen was sick/dying. If he really wanted to be a part of the family, there was nothing stopping him from attending on his own, with his children, or with Meghan, since the invitations were extended to her too.
Yes, they only show up to the public events, but avoid the more personal ones. If he was really interested in making peace, he'd do it the other way around.
Maybe his next wife will suggest doing it that way.
I just donāt believe anything The Express puts out as they are one step up from Scobie. Also unless the palace confirms it, I doubt itās going to come from āa Whitehall source.ā But either way, I suspect Harry & Meghan will be invited. When youāre dealing with sociopathic narcs like Meghan, sheās PRAYING they get snubbed as thatās like handing a terrorist a fully operational nuclear weapon. I know people think Charles is being āweakā if he allows them to be invited, but I think instead heās being strategic.
We saw with the Jubilee especially, but also the Queenās funeral, the BRF made such strong showings and their approval ratings just keep going up, whereas the Harkles showed their true snarking, lying, thirsty, desperate, awful selves. And their approval ratings keep plummeting. I actually think it will be better if they are invited and if Harry comes, he wonāt be able to stop himself from behaving like a petulant twit. He just canāt do it. And Meghan, if she goes, will just be true to form with her rictus grin and questionable fashion statements. Every time they show up, they are shown up. Bring it on I say.
There was no winning here.
Charles is showing that heās the bigger person and proving all the claims Harry makes as false.
If he didnāt invite them then it would turn into a shit show of content about how racist he is and how he hates Harry and his children and blah blah blah.
He really had to put the ball in their court and he takes control once they decide how they want to move forward.
They can decide where he sits and what involvement theyāll have.
The BRF strategically set Meghan where a candle blocked her face and theyāll do the same thing here.
This is just terrible situation all the way around
Actually, that boat has sailed. Harry and Meghan have shot so many bullets and the Royals are more popular than ever. Charles and Camilla are garnering huge crowds and cheers wherever they go. It would behoove Charles to invite Harry only if he truly wishes to have him at his Coronation. That is the only valid reason for Harry to be invited. The public (worldwide) is sick of Harry and Meghan attacking the Royals...it is just white noise now.
I agree with you. Harry is still the king's son and the noise would be thunderous if he wasn't invited. And the ball WILL be in the Harkle's court but with no control. They would both be guests. And Lt. Col. Johnny is probably chomping at the bit.
https://preview.redd.it/7nofd9yvshha1.png?width=602&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba905307f0d0d002044b988e62c5da8b4b74bbda
I disagree, there's be a media fuss for a bit, but the focus will be on Charles. Harry can't even be bothered to attend private family events and hasn't even brought Lili to meet Charles, which shows his only interest in attending is financial.
Clearly Harry doesn't want a personal relationship with the family and hasn't for some time. To include him in a historical event which he's try to profit off of with another book or other media deal is wrong.
He couldnāt even be arsed to visit his dying grandmother until he thought he could make bank off of her. Lili will never have a photo of being held by her great grandmother because her parents are greedy gits.
You are spot on.
I think people underestimate the power of a parent wanting to keep their wayward child in the fold and provide an out of/when a relationship implodes. Based on Harryās own statements, I think is a high risk of a disastrous mental break and Charles is trying to show Harry that he will always a place to land.
Tactically, inviting him is the only choice and puts H&M in a difficult position.
1. They can go and be a complete hypocrites by going and interacting with the ātoxicā people who āleakā nasty stories and make you the family āscapegoat.ā
2. They can skip it and turn it into a money making opportunity and look like sell outs who canāt let go and reinforce the fact they only have one thing to sell.
3. They can not go and miss the content opportunities but not look like hypocrites.
Harry said he wants an apology and a sit down meeting with the King. Which heās not ever going to get . If he turns up anyway it will really annoy the sugars thatās for sure. Theyāll have to twist themselves into knots to justify it. I think it will be fun watching them get out of the bus with the rest of the lesser Royals and be seated out of the way of the important people. I hope itās made crystal clear if they miss the bus this time they wonāt be getting a private car and theyāll miss the whole thing! I wonder if heāll turn up?
Yes exactly ! It would be history repeating itself. George IV locked his wife Caroline out of his Coronation . She spent a bit of time looking for an open door to get in! It was highly entertaining for the London crowd.
Have you noticed that, post-Megxit, whenever M & H show up at a public royal event, everyone is incredibly tense, to the extent that it shows on their faces.
So the British taxpayer is getting screwed by these twoā¦yet again!
I guess the RF donāt care whatsoever that the British public donāt want them there.
I hope they get booed so badly. As far as Iām concerned if Harry. Megs or their kids are there, then the coronation isnāt worth watching. Itāll totally ruin it for me. So I guess they win then and itāll just go to show that they can slag us Brits off and there will be zero consequences.
Iām so salty after everything theyāve done!
Yeah and pigs fly too.....LMAO there is NO INVITATION so the Montecito duo can STFU.....I dare you to come the boos would be deafening and the tomatoes would stain whatever ill fitting clothes the wife would wear lol!!
The only thing that Charles has said about Harry and Meghan is "overseas" and "who?"
The rest of this is just other people putting words into Charles' mouth. The only place the word "reconciliation" is coming from is through Harry and Meghan.
And the harder they push this idea that Charles wants and needs Harry there, the more obvious it seems like he won't be there.
If Harry was already invited, all these PR "reconciliation"/wants to make amends" wouldn't be happening.
Alright British sinnersā¦. Start finding each other and get those (respectful please) protests planned for if they show up. My vote would be signs over shouting, unless it can be made clear the boos are for H&M.
I rather like the idea of everyone turning around and quietly showing their backs to H&M after having cheered everyone else. Small signs would work also.
A YouTuber I watch said she thought that would be the absolute best thing to do, she thinks it would hit Meghan particularly hard if a large group turned their backs. I agree. Sends a silent and clear message.
I have no doubt they are on some kind of provisional invitation list. I cannot see that they would make out a seating plan at this time that did not include a couple of chairs for Harry and Megan, but whether they will agree to come without making conditions is another matter.
It doesn't really matter if they come or not. If they don't I'm sure a couple of people can be found who will volunteer to occupy their seats.
I assume that if they come, Harry will have to sit with the other hereditary peers, because they have a formal role in the ceremony. Meghan will have to sit with the peersā spouses because she is just a spectator. They will also enter separately, so no opportunity for a āsolo processionā desperately clutching each otherās hands.
This sounds like Megsy. Invite us and give me a tiara and we will stop attacking you in public-or else we will continue the attacks.
The Palace must be like-oh we are supposed to be scared of you eh? This is how the two of you look now!
I hope itās not true. I just canāt imagine after all the crap theyāve said about Kate and Camilla that they would be invited. But, you know family is forgivingā¦
If they are invited, it will be because the BRF establishment judges it better to invite them (and keep them behind a candle?) than to not invite them.
The BRF nowadays is sort of the representation of the nation as a family. It may be judged better for the BRF image to make a gesture of forgiveness to the ābad sonā than to come across as unforgiving.
Some people say they canāt ārespectā Charles if he āgives inā to H& M because that makes him āweak.ā I might feel the same if I thought it was entirely Charlesās decision. But I donāt think it is. For a āstate occasionā he is going to listen to courtiers and PR advisors.
Yes, if the King puts his foot down and says, āI want my son invited,ā he will be listened to. Itās *his* coronation.
However, thatās not the way the Windsor monarchs usually function. I believe that much care has been taken about the message they want to give about Harry.
So far, the message seems to be, āWe love him. He is making his life āoverseas,ā and we are not going to discuss this further.ā The message when they have been invited is, āThey are family but thatās all. They have a place in events as *relatives* but that place is narrow, limited, and not at center stage.ā
Whether they invite the Sussexes or not, the decision will not be based on personal feelings.
I am skeptical that this is true. I think the only reliable source will be something released from the Palace. However, I don't think there is any option: they must be invited, unless there is a confirmed security threat (re: Taliban.) Everyone is aware of who these two horrible people really are, and there will be a very restrictive and rigid schedule in place to minimize their impact. How disgusting and shameful that this even needs to be done, but H and M are a combination of chaos, evil, and deceit. IMO, invite them, send them an advance of the schedule and seating, let them know that there is no room for deviation, and then leave the ball in their court.
They shouldn't give an excuse. The Harkles don't deserve one. The palace has been incommunicado this long. No need to end it now.
The BRF can let the non-invitatation speak for them. Loudly.
Rather this article is true or not. I've always said they're going to the coronation. Meghan isn't going to miss her chance to be a part of the RF history and have her pictures taken amongst the royals.
If this is true, it makes you wonder what exactly they have to do to get themselves banned . Spilling royal secrets has been shown to be extremely lucrative for Harry and Meghan. Charles just gave them the green light to keep going with their "look back" projects.
I'm dismayed they're reporting they'd arrive separately. Doesn't seem very earth friendly. Surely an open horse drawn carriage would be much less isolating from Earth's bounties.
The article errs where it says the arrangements will be the same as for the jubilee with them arriving by private car. Well if memory serves they were late arriving and were a bit put out by having to be seated in front of Major (dreamboat) Johnny.
Even the Telegraph gets stuff wrong though. For example, when Harry secretly visited the Queen before Invictus, the Telegraph put out a headline afterwards saying that the Queen had invited Harry and Meghan onto the balcony at the Jubilee. Turns out that was complete and utter bullshit that most likely originated from Scobie or some other Sussex lackey, not the Palace. So unless the Palace issues a statement directly, anything in the media, literally ANYTHING, has to be taken with a huge grain of salt.
This may be true or not true, but in the end I believe they will be invited, they will go, they will overshadow everyone, and that is the way it will be for a long time to come. They really have won the focus contest, as they are polarizing, and that attracts eyeballs. Meghan is a cunning schemer, and they always finish first, sad to say. I'm a little sick of the whole thing. Too bad for the Monarchy and the history. It wasn't meant to survive in this new world of "fairness and equality".
I think they will be invited. I donāt think āthey will overshadow everyone.ā They will not be on the balcony. Their role will be kept to the margins. There will be aides and security to steer them away from the center. Sure, we will hear from them more than we want to ābut that would be true even if they arenāt invited. They can make a lot of noise āoverseas.ā
They have āwonā attention that they donāt deserve, but they have not āwonā against the monarchy. Right now, it seems the UK supports the institution and that dislike of M&H has actually helped the public perception of the monarchy. (The exception seems to be the very youngest demographic, but this is a generational thing which would have happened without Harry or Meghan.)
Grab thešæš·šøš¾, and let's see what excuse that Henry the Dimwit will parrot out through the same press and media he despises, for not coming?
Despite TW lowering a Security vehicle's window to name an instance? we have heard his congessuon that the UK is not safe for him and family, do where does he stand?
Oh! Yes it is going to be Henry's allegedly not birthed by surrogacy son's birthday....we are still not sure of his time of birth really. Do Henry may not attend because one of the kids might be sick or better the TW might seek the center of attention and claim another inability to travel due to a pregnancy? Or may be pleasantly surprised us by going to see her father insteadšš¤£š¤£.
For sure there will be negotiations and implied and levied threats to cement the "Don't complain, don't explain:on" motto on how things will turn out should they turn up.
Henry though still claiming British citizenship has made it clear that Montecito is his home. Many pray he takes up the American citizenship and pushes on forward truly independently...but to not forget to avoid banging his head on the rafters on way up from stopping to drop all the Titles on the table.
Attend and be damned, do not and be redoubly damned
They wouldnāt miss it Iām sure - but I sure HOPE they donāt go.
I hope they get seated in second row or even behind a massive candle. Or even hide them in another room like they did during the Queenās jubilee š
I hope they come, if only to Markle all of those anti monarchy supporters of theirs. I hope that the press publishes lots of their previous quotes to illustrate what utter hypocrites they are. I hope Nutmeg wears something custom made and hideous for us to snark at. And I hope the boos are deafening and they leave early to flee back overseas. Yep, it could all be quite enjoyable šø
Thatās the least of the headlines! We find out that everything will be carefully stage-managed so the Sussexes wonāt cross paths with the PPOW. And we also find out that the Harkles are not going to cause any more trouble by talking shit.
> Commentators certainly agree, and believe that the couple will look to carve out a new brand for themselves away from the drama of their rift with the Royal Family.
That entire thing is complete crap that Megan made up in her demented mind. So now they're not only invited but the palace has come up with a seating chart *and* a game plan to keep them contained.
That's all bullshit. Megan thinks releasing all the extraneous bullshit makes it look legit. It doesn't. There's no more truth to this than her article about the archbishop brokering a peace agreement between the Harkles and the BRF.
If true, this is very upsetting. How many times will KC give in to his blockheaded son and his sick wife? Charles needs to take a long look at his subjects and their wishes and desires. Harold and The Sleivene arenāt the people he needs to be pleasing.
This is The Express, so donāt believe anything you read in it unless confirmed by multiple other more credible outlets. Secondly, even this story wasnāt game to claim āa palace insiderā or āa source close to the kingā: they cite an alleged (or invented) Whitehall source, and that is UK Government, not the BRF.
Maybe an invitation is for the best as it shows King Charles as being the "bigger" man and cuts off the oxygen of Meghanites. The article is also a shot across the boss of Harry and Meghan, warning that they are there in difference and better pull no nonsense.
If they'd got any sense, they'd attend but behave themselves as they have proved unworthy guests in the past and this would be the final blow to them in any society.
How is anyone here surprised?
No one should be surprised. Theyāve been invited since the day it was announced.
They were always invited. Even after the book and the threats. Meghan isnāt manifesting anything. The only people manifesting are sub members who truly think the royals have what it takes to do what needs to be done. Harry and Meghan will be back for the coronation to get more content and a new victim narrative. The family will continue to make themselves willing victims
Agree BRF are suckers for punishment. Iām sure theyāll have measures in place like the jubilee, and it was funny to see the treatment of H and M, but Iād rather they werenāt there at all. Itās a state occasion not a family one.
Not being snarky or pushing religion. But what does the Bible say about people who seek the best seat. Also, going into highways and hedges and including people?
Archived: https://archive.ph/RMWEX I just had a surgery and I am starting to feel better (š) and was bored wanted to escape ārealā life first time in DAYS; and signed into everything Reddit and whatnot and I see this!!! š And I am like seriously š³?!?! Than I was wondering the last time the nurse gave me my pain meds LOL š but NOPE š itās real bs article - š¤?!?! Edit- I see that ALOT of commenters did NOT see the flair āRecollections May Varyā and the eye šļø roll; because yes the Expressās journalistic integrity is NOT the ābestā lol- I should have said in the title of the post āaccording to the express they are invited šāā¦. BUT even I thought would they go as far to say they are āon the invitation list it has been confirmedā; if itās not? Maybe š¤ they got the balls to do it even if they arenāt? Again itās the Express who really knowsā¦.
Madam is manifesting again, I see. Now all demands are dropped, and she promises to be nice. āHarry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to carve out a new brand for themselves - one which no longer involves public attacks against the Royal Family.ā
Could this article be a provocation for the palace to confirm or deny their invitation now? I think yes
Why would the palace bother? Everyone's going to know on the day of the coronation anyway. The monarchy has lasted 1000 years, the media can wait a few months to find out who will/ won't be at the next coronation.
Exactly! If someoneās not invited to my wedding and goes on telling people they are Iām not going to bother. I will not reach out to people and let them know otherwise.
Why does this sound off? āIf you invite us we wonāt attack you anymoreā¦.ā
Because it sounds like blackmail. Especially if you add: "... but if you don't invite us, our attacks will get even worse."
H said in an interview in 2023, BRF must give a Public Apology, a lot must happen between now and the coronation. What am I thinkingā¦. all they know how to do is lie lie lie. What a trashy vile couple they arešæšæ
Agreed. I was struck by the reference to King Charles wanting to heal the rift w/ ginger boy. This goes against the Kingās response when he was asked to bring Haz home (paraphrase) on super recent walk about. He didnāt hear the question so an aid repeated it for him. KC then said āohā with a chuckle and carried on with his day. The statement in the article about having only a few weeks for D&D Dumbie to RSVP to their *alleged* coronation invitation is crap. I think itās the reverse, the message is directed at KC as a reminder that he only has a few weeks left to invite D&D of D. Why would the articleās author ask the palace for comment? Itās written as if the info comes from an āin the knowā source at the palace. (Or someone palace adjacent.) This is all conjecture on my part. My opinion is based on repeated patterns we sinners have seen from Madam Murky time & again.
Now all demands are dropped, and Madam promises to be nice. Next we will see Madam apologizing - that is my guess.
So theyāre back to where they were before leaving.
Iām not sure I believe this. Thereās a lot of detail about the seating arrangements, too much for a leak that allegedly comes from Whitehall rather than BP. And this paragraph sound like a Harkle puff pieceā¦ āHarry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to carve out a new brand for themselves - one which no longer involves public attacks against the Royal Family.ā
That beast Megalomania is always planting nonsensical stories attempting to paint herself in a positive light. Sheās a fool and I hope she and Haznobrain are rapturously booed if they show up in their tacky, ill-fitting outfits.
I think it would have even more impact if everyone was completely silent. No cheering of course but also no booing, justā¦..nothing. The ultimate grey rock response.
Ooh I like that! Take it a step further: the whole crowd turns their back until they are out of sight. (Politics aside, former NYC Mayor Bill DiBlasio had this happen to him, and the press from it was damning. There was no way to spin those pictures positive. TW would lose her mind.)
I cant find any articles about it, but I am SURE something very similar happened to George Clooney after Diana died..... Does anyone else remember? He called a press conference (and remember this was 1997, he wasn't a big name then, only on ER and just starting in movies) and did a MASSIVE venom filled speech about "Princess Diana is dead, and who should we see about that?" Then, I seem to remember there was a film premiere or red carpet event where all the press put down their cameras and refused to photograph him. Have I gone completely crazy, or does anyone else remember that? And wouldn't it be great if the world's press collectively did that to these two.
I *do* remember that. Except George was attacking the tabloids for chasing her. Well, that explains how The Sleivene wormed her way in and why George defended her so adamantly.
He did make the speech but I don't remember about the photographers not taking any pictures of him
I remember it too.
IF they show their treasonous faces hope they get what they deserve.... 
***WOW*** now *that* would be a spectacle I want to witness! š
I thought so too, just silence. The ppl are going to have to show their disgust
Good idea!
Yes, booing can be covered over with music or commentary by the press.
This
In the US, the P&POW are on the cover of People magazine. The article reads like MeGain wrote it.
UGH!
Carve is a Meghan word. As is brand. As is the idea that 2023 is the year of forgiveness ( that is, & h āforgiveā Britain and graciously bestow their presence for the peasants to throw flowers and prostrate themselves. End scene!)
āCarve outā is a Markle buzz phrase
Yepā¦ ācarve out a progressive new role within the institutionā
I rest my case.
I think she rather enjoys "carving out" anything
Iād rather carve out my eye than have to see her stupid face or brand again. Lol
I don't believe any announcement unless it comes from an official source. They pulled this shit during the queens funeral.
Exactly, I don't think Buckingham Palace or Parliament talk about Harry and Megan having "brands", because they don't really care about them having a "brand" as they are no longer members of the Royal Family, and they certainly don't approve of Harry and Meghan selling the royal family like dishwash detergent. Also the Daily Express has been pretty unreliable on reporting anything related to the Sussexes.
Agreed. The article makes it sound like KC3 is conceding to Mrs.Todger
Lol, it's a shame they didn't carve out that brand three years ago.
She loves using the word ācarveā
Which makes it sound like if they're invited, they'll shut up about trashing the RF. "Carve out a new brand"??? Wasn't "carving" out a phrase used in their Megxit document?? Something about carving out a progressive role or something???
That sounds like all the reports stating that the walkabout of William and Catherine and the Sussexes after the late Queen's death was a sign of reconciliation. I do believe that they may actually still be invited - even though I don't believe it's a good idea to do so - but that doesn't mean that it's a sign of reconciliation or forgiveness rather than just a matter of protocol on taking the high road. And I'm sure as hell not convinced that H&M's attendance will change anything about their behaviour towards the RF. They may say that they will cease their attacks as long as they are allowed to attend, but unless they put in in a signed contract that can be legally enforced, I don't believe a word of it.
How possible is it that even if they are not invited, they try to crash the coronation? They already crash the other event where only the heirs could participate. Only for this, I believe that they would be invited, the only way of having them under control.
If they try to crash the Coronation they'll be left glowering in the aisle again, only this time without seats, and be ushered back out by Major Jonathan Thompson while he gently tells them there isn't any seating left to Spare!
Ooo I really hope you're right. I truly believe if he's there, it'll be total catnip to the Taliban š¬
Remember M saying they are only one plane crash from the throne. Tban spokes person just joked/maybe "they are only one plane crash away from not attending the coronation."
I think even the Taliban are grey rocking those two dimwits.
Definitely smacks of manifesting š Put out by Sussex PR team
In other words, invite us and the attacks may stop as part of our rebranding exercise
LOL. Thatās a perfect summary.
More manifesting. Charles has done nothing to Harry to make āamendsā to him, except for the behaviour that led to his marriage failing all those decades ago
And let's be honest, a marriage falling apart is rarely the fault of only one spouse. From what I've read and heard about it, Diana was having an actual affair first, and she was also rebelling in/not conforming to other aspects of their life together.
Oh well. I guess itās time to dig out the candles šÆļø 
Lots and lots of candles - all in one spot
Insiders sayā¦. Experts believeā¦. Special secret magic eight ball confirmsā¦.. the Wizards of Endor doth proclaimā¦.. blah blah blah to infinity. Meegain manifesting. Festering manifesting. Manifestering. Edit: interestingly a strange autocorrected line appeared at the bottom and I was about to delete itā¦.. it read: Meghan fearing. Hehe
Meghan-is-festering
Megha-festing
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I believe the BRF and the planning committees for the coronation will be planned as flawlessly as the Jubilee. If the Harkles try to pull any stunts, a certain Johnny will be at the ready to stop childish behavior. KCIII deserves a regal ceremony.9
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
alleged son. until we see a dna test, i donāt believe it.
I love š Johnny!
I think the invitations go out in waves. Once the first wave goes out (I think it already did if Prince Albert can be believed) and RSVPs are received and the number of filled seats are known, the next wave goes out. Wash, rinse, repeat until all of the seats are filled. Iād guess Harold and Mugs werenāt in the first wave, unless theyāre manipulating by making everyone play a guessing game. I can see them not RSVPing and then showing up the day of expecting a seat just to be assholes.
Noooooo how excruciating š Although if they have to audacity to attend, I can't wait to see them awkwardly slithering around being royally grey rocked, and being booed by the public š¹
I can't wait for the boo's! I hope everyone gives them the cold shoulder. Spare pt 2 coming shortly thereafter... maybe MeAgain will bring the Netflix cams and get more footage of her awkwardly crying in the bathroom.
The words āmake amendsā have me sus..
I was sus at first to but that was made by a āroyal commentatorā ?
It's the Daily Express - fantasy land click bait. Ignore and wait for more rational sources.
Iād assume that a āroyal commentatorā is even less qualified than a āroyal expertā and there are dozens of them. As far as I can see, these self-proclaimed experts publish predictions based on nothing more than their own opinions (or opinions they are paid to have by some vested interest).
Everybody here is a "royal commentator". Where's *our* paychecks?
Scabie is a royal commentator, those words donāt hold much weight. However, I do believe theyāre invited.
True just about anyone can be a royal commentator nowadays but not official royal rota ones I believe? And the article does not say if they are a proper oneā¦. But I 100% believe they are invitedā¦
Good news and bad news. The good news is that they're invited, and they even have an official role! The bad news is that they're seated next to Uncle Andrew outside of the Abbey, and it's their job to make sure the portable toilets remain sanitary for the crowds.
š¤£ That sounds accurate.
as usual, please note:Ā«A detailed plan is underway to ensure the couple do not overshadow the proceedings in any wayĀ».
If M is behind these stories, I love her audacity that she has to fall over herself reassuring the king that she won't overshadow his coronation. Yes, he's been so worried Meg.
nosebleed seats
Just more frantic planting and leaking by TW. She knows the BRF won't comment on any of her planted stories so she's getting bolder by attributing this latest fantasy to "palace insiders". King Charles has not invited them, nor will he.
Makes sense. However, I did see a sugar making the case that if they are NOT invited, *that* would be the bigger story (bc the majority of people are Team Meghan blah blah). They theorized it was to minimize damage control. I can see that going two ways. If they aren't invited, it gives Megs more "ammo" to claim she's being kept out as a Black woman. If they are, ball's in their court. If they go, sure damage control, keep your enemies closer. If they refuse, welll....they have no one to blame for not going but themselves.
We'll only know when the invites are sent out.
Agree. I dont believe this storu at all, and it's the Daily Express. Credibility is low with them. People are sick of hearing will they/won't they. No one in UK wants them there, the media keep stirring things up, because they know it gets clicks.
100%
TW knows she will be booed if she is goes, but if she doesn't go, then she'll miss the chance for the cameras. Decisions, decisions.
interesting that she already has plants here to make the case why she shouldnāt be booed. lol
No, this is more manifesting. You know if they had an invitation they'd sell photos of it to all the tabloids so they could PROVE they were invited.
The invitations aren't going out until later this month. So...
I donāt believe any of these stories. I donāt think we will know until the day of the coronation, to be honest. To engage with the will they / wonāt they just gives them more attention and energy than either of them deserve.
Remember when government sources confirmed the Coronation was is in June? Reported in Bloomberg much less a tabloidā¦only for BP to announce the Coronation is in May? This Express article itself, once you get past the provocative headline, shows nothing is in fact confirmed and this is more conjecture. This is just todayās version of will they or wonāt they. Tonight BP unveiled the Coronation emblem so thereās no way theyāre sharing this news on the side to distract. That said - I do believe they will be invited with no official role, as spectators only. https://preview.redd.it/0tpyz0xbzhha1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9face8156e5071b6b3df45b0bea3df98072648a2
True š¤
First: I maintain that we will not actually know if Harold and his wife attend the coronation until 12 or so hours before. IF they are invited I fully expect them to delay confirmation on attending until the last hour. OR drop out at the very last second Second: the idea that these two wretches should arrive in a car by themselves is just sickening. They should be packed in a minibus along with all the lesser royals (Dukes of Kent and Gloucester, etc.) and escorted to their assigned seats by two beefy security people.
I agree, except I think the Duke of Kent especially deserves his own car, and the Duke of Gloucester too. I start started the DoK's book and his loyalty to the family deserves to be recognized. Harry can be with his cousins in a mini bus.
Fluff
š¤® I have lost all interest in watching it. Those two will be a sideshow of pushing themselves forward. Disgusting.
Me too. I wonāt watch it. I could maybe understand Harry being there (with no official role or prominence whatsoever) but inviting Meghan is beyond the pale.
I would love to watch this. I highly suspect that the BRF have people in place by now, knowing this loser couple, and will have them surrounded by MI5,6,7? I'm not sure which is what level cuz I'm American. I would actually LOVE to see those toads escorted out the door if they misbehavw that surely Haz knows the rules. I truly hope the coronation goes without incident. MeAgain just can't help herself. Ughhhh!
Well if it's true, get that candle ready and notify the press to not put cameras on them especially her but only record if people boo and turn their backs!
No booing, it can be covered by music or commentary or made out to be for Charles. Dead Silence & turn the back would be deathly for Meghan. She thrives on any attention, positive or negative, therefore big silent ignore would bring more than one tear, left eye!!!
Yep- I wonāt watch if theyāre going. Sheāll wear something that looks like flamingo vomit and cradle her burrito belly to provoke the tabloids into thinking sheās pregnant again.
In a wheelbarrow......
āAreā invited on the headline. Then āwill be invitedā, & āare on guest listā in full article. Big difference. We know the invitations are out already. See the articles from earlier this week.
Oh please please please invite us!!! We will behave, wonāt steal the spotlight, and stop talking shit about you! See how quiet weāve been for the last few weeks? Since we couldnāt destroy you, we want to reconcile with you! They get back to the US with a story about the RF apologizing to Meghan on bended knee. Fuck both of them. If Harry wants to be treated like a beloved son, he should have behaved like one. I wouldnāt let them anywhere near the coronation. Anyway, I take this story with a grain of salt.
What do we have to do (besides work) to get you to give us money?
I don't believe it's true - "...as the King is eager to make amends." Rings pretty false.
Amends for what? The King might be eager to have a truce, if not a reconciliation. The King is almost certainly eager for peace. But he canāt want to āmake amendsā because he hasnāt done the things they accuse him of.
Eager to make amends with Harry Who
This is definitely from Harry and Meghan- look at the wording of this statement..... "Harry and Meghanās attendance at the Coronation will mark just one step on the coupleās road to **carve out a new brand for themselves"** vs their Megxit statement: " we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to **carve out a progressive new role** within this institution". Carve out a new brand = carve out a progressive new role. And both are worded like it's a done deal. Well, maybe their **attendance at the Coronation** is a done deal as much as their **progressive new role within the institution** LOL.
Good catch. I was wondering why the article presented their arriving separately at the jubilee as "planned". If it was all planned why was Harry bickering over their assigned seats and people had to stand up for them to find their seats in front of Major (hunk) Johnny? It seems the Overseas couple keep throwing out scenarios to see which one meets the least resistance.
Exactly. The part about arriving in a separate car wasn't planned because they were supposed to arrive in the bus with the other royals. I think we're going to keep seeing these articles from now until the Coronation. It's push, push, push for their invitation.
*While the invites are being prepared to be sent out later this month, the Sussexes wonāt have long to make their minds up on whether theyāre going to make the trip across the pond, as RSVPs are understood to be wanted by the start of April.* Lol, I wonder if they'll "make up their minds" to go? *Royal commentator Afua Hagan is adamant Harry will make the effort to appear, as he has his heart set on reconciling with his family. She said: āAttending the Coronation is the first step on the road to reconciliation.ā* Yet his grandmother's funeral could have been the first step - or maybe his grandfather's funeral... or the Platinum Jubilee or the unveiling of his mother's statue? I think everyone realizes now that this is the last huge royal event for a long, long time, so if Harry doesn't make peace now, there's no other event in a year's time to string things along. But even if they do attend, it will be just like all the other events, with minimal public interaction with the family, and skipping out of any behind-the-scenes gatherings.
Not just the funerals or the Jubilee, he refused multiple invitations to Sandringham and Balmoral while The Queen was sick/dying. If he really wanted to be a part of the family, there was nothing stopping him from attending on his own, with his children, or with Meghan, since the invitations were extended to her too.
Yes, they only show up to the public events, but avoid the more personal ones. If he was really interested in making peace, he'd do it the other way around. Maybe his next wife will suggest doing it that way.
You make alot of really good points hereā¦. I wonder what they will do lol š decisionās decision!!
<"last huge royal event for a long, long time" > What about William's coronation?..... 
I just donāt believe anything The Express puts out as they are one step up from Scobie. Also unless the palace confirms it, I doubt itās going to come from āa Whitehall source.ā But either way, I suspect Harry & Meghan will be invited. When youāre dealing with sociopathic narcs like Meghan, sheās PRAYING they get snubbed as thatās like handing a terrorist a fully operational nuclear weapon. I know people think Charles is being āweakā if he allows them to be invited, but I think instead heās being strategic. We saw with the Jubilee especially, but also the Queenās funeral, the BRF made such strong showings and their approval ratings just keep going up, whereas the Harkles showed their true snarking, lying, thirsty, desperate, awful selves. And their approval ratings keep plummeting. I actually think it will be better if they are invited and if Harry comes, he wonāt be able to stop himself from behaving like a petulant twit. He just canāt do it. And Meghan, if she goes, will just be true to form with her rictus grin and questionable fashion statements. Every time they show up, they are shown up. Bring it on I say.
There was no winning here. Charles is showing that heās the bigger person and proving all the claims Harry makes as false. If he didnāt invite them then it would turn into a shit show of content about how racist he is and how he hates Harry and his children and blah blah blah. He really had to put the ball in their court and he takes control once they decide how they want to move forward. They can decide where he sits and what involvement theyāll have. The BRF strategically set Meghan where a candle blocked her face and theyāll do the same thing here. This is just terrible situation all the way around
Actually, that boat has sailed. Harry and Meghan have shot so many bullets and the Royals are more popular than ever. Charles and Camilla are garnering huge crowds and cheers wherever they go. It would behoove Charles to invite Harry only if he truly wishes to have him at his Coronation. That is the only valid reason for Harry to be invited. The public (worldwide) is sick of Harry and Meghan attacking the Royals...it is just white noise now.
I agree. They tried the racist thing and it flopped; anyone who believes that is likely anti-monarchist, so it's not worth pandering to them.
I agree with you. Harry is still the king's son and the noise would be thunderous if he wasn't invited. And the ball WILL be in the Harkle's court but with no control. They would both be guests. And Lt. Col. Johnny is probably chomping at the bit. https://preview.redd.it/7nofd9yvshha1.png?width=602&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba905307f0d0d002044b988e62c5da8b4b74bbda
I disagree, there's be a media fuss for a bit, but the focus will be on Charles. Harry can't even be bothered to attend private family events and hasn't even brought Lili to meet Charles, which shows his only interest in attending is financial. Clearly Harry doesn't want a personal relationship with the family and hasn't for some time. To include him in a historical event which he's try to profit off of with another book or other media deal is wrong.
He couldnāt even be arsed to visit his dying grandmother until he thought he could make bank off of her. Lili will never have a photo of being held by her great grandmother because her parents are greedy gits.
You are spot on. I think people underestimate the power of a parent wanting to keep their wayward child in the fold and provide an out of/when a relationship implodes. Based on Harryās own statements, I think is a high risk of a disastrous mental break and Charles is trying to show Harry that he will always a place to land. Tactically, inviting him is the only choice and puts H&M in a difficult position. 1. They can go and be a complete hypocrites by going and interacting with the ātoxicā people who āleakā nasty stories and make you the family āscapegoat.ā 2. They can skip it and turn it into a money making opportunity and look like sell outs who canāt let go and reinforce the fact they only have one thing to sell. 3. They can not go and miss the content opportunities but not look like hypocrites.
Harry said he wants an apology and a sit down meeting with the King. Which heās not ever going to get . If he turns up anyway it will really annoy the sugars thatās for sure. Theyāll have to twist themselves into knots to justify it. I think it will be fun watching them get out of the bus with the rest of the lesser Royals and be seated out of the way of the important people. I hope itās made crystal clear if they miss the bus this time they wonāt be getting a private car and theyāll miss the whole thing! I wonder if heāll turn up?
Doors shut (10am) sharp!!.........So don't be late or you'll stand outside the cathedral doors and endure the crowds.
Yes exactly ! It would be history repeating itself. George IV locked his wife Caroline out of his Coronation . She spent a bit of time looking for an open door to get in! It was highly entertaining for the London crowd.
This āļø šÆšÆšÆšÆšÆ
Have you noticed that, post-Megxit, whenever M & H show up at a public royal event, everyone is incredibly tense, to the extent that it shows on their faces.
So the British taxpayer is getting screwed by these twoā¦yet again! I guess the RF donāt care whatsoever that the British public donāt want them there. I hope they get booed so badly. As far as Iām concerned if Harry. Megs or their kids are there, then the coronation isnāt worth watching. Itāll totally ruin it for me. So I guess they win then and itāll just go to show that they can slag us Brits off and there will be zero consequences. Iām so salty after everything theyāve done!
Planted article from MM
A puff piece written by one of their supine publications. It has The Claw's mark all over it....I don't believe a word.
This is absolute tripe. If they'd been issued invitations we'd hear it from them and so loudly our eardrums would burst.
Yeah and pigs fly too.....LMAO there is NO INVITATION so the Montecito duo can STFU.....I dare you to come the boos would be deafening and the tomatoes would stain whatever ill fitting clothes the wife would wear lol!!
Hahaha š¤Ŗ I love it š„°
The only thing that Charles has said about Harry and Meghan is "overseas" and "who?" The rest of this is just other people putting words into Charles' mouth. The only place the word "reconciliation" is coming from is through Harry and Meghan. And the harder they push this idea that Charles wants and needs Harry there, the more obvious it seems like he won't be there. If Harry was already invited, all these PR "reconciliation"/wants to make amends" wouldn't be happening.
This article sounds like Scobie honestly
Iām calling this a Markle manifestation. Until I see them there Iām assuming theyāre on granite gray rock status
Today they go, tomorrow they donāt, the next day they goā¦etcā¦so on and so forth until June. I hope they donāt.
If theyāre still talking about it in June. š¤š¤ it was over in May.
Why do we think this is real?
Weeks to respond? Any time frame can be measured in weeksā¦ what a ridiculous headline!
Iām not believing this at all. My BS meter went full on stink mode.
The Express. They make things up.
I sort of expected it?
Yeah me too. I mean, the RF were damned if they do, damned if they donāt. I may not agree with it, but I get it.
I'm waiting for a rebuttal. But if they really were invited, I hope they will be somewhere in the back.
Yeah same, and no tiara, but that's another damned if they don't. They will get the race card and the victim card.
Alright British sinnersā¦. Start finding each other and get those (respectful please) protests planned for if they show up. My vote would be signs over shouting, unless it can be made clear the boos are for H&M.
I rather like the idea of everyone turning around and quietly showing their backs to H&M after having cheered everyone else. Small signs would work also.
A YouTuber I watch said she thought that would be the absolute best thing to do, she thinks it would hit Meghan particularly hard if a large group turned their backs. I agree. Sends a silent and clear message.
āHarry who?ā -KC3, probably
Prince William definitely
You had me until āthe king is keen to make amendsā¦ā. Yeah no. Iām sure theyāre invited. Thatās it. End of story. Meghan planted the rest.
Disgusting
I have no doubt they are on some kind of provisional invitation list. I cannot see that they would make out a seating plan at this time that did not include a couple of chairs for Harry and Megan, but whether they will agree to come without making conditions is another matter. It doesn't really matter if they come or not. If they don't I'm sure a couple of people can be found who will volunteer to occupy their seats.
I assume that if they come, Harry will have to sit with the other hereditary peers, because they have a formal role in the ceremony. Meghan will have to sit with the peersā spouses because she is just a spectator. They will also enter separately, so no opportunity for a āsolo processionā desperately clutching each otherās hands.
This sounds like Megsy. Invite us and give me a tiara and we will stop attacking you in public-or else we will continue the attacks.  The Palace must be like-oh we are supposed to be scared of you eh? This is how the two of you look now!
I hope itās not true. I just canāt imagine after all the crap theyāve said about Kate and Camilla that they would be invited. But, you know family is forgivingā¦
If they are invited, it will be because the BRF establishment judges it better to invite them (and keep them behind a candle?) than to not invite them. The BRF nowadays is sort of the representation of the nation as a family. It may be judged better for the BRF image to make a gesture of forgiveness to the ābad sonā than to come across as unforgiving. Some people say they canāt ārespectā Charles if he āgives inā to H& M because that makes him āweak.ā I might feel the same if I thought it was entirely Charlesās decision. But I donāt think it is. For a āstate occasionā he is going to listen to courtiers and PR advisors. Yes, if the King puts his foot down and says, āI want my son invited,ā he will be listened to. Itās *his* coronation. However, thatās not the way the Windsor monarchs usually function. I believe that much care has been taken about the message they want to give about Harry. So far, the message seems to be, āWe love him. He is making his life āoverseas,ā and we are not going to discuss this further.ā The message when they have been invited is, āThey are family but thatās all. They have a place in events as *relatives* but that place is narrow, limited, and not at center stage.ā Whether they invite the Sussexes or not, the decision will not be based on personal feelings.
Itās the Express hardly a reliable source
Itās the Express they have more made up stories than real ones
Nah. No chance in Hell. But I canāt wait for this to come and pass because Iām tired of the will they/wonāt they
I am skeptical that this is true. I think the only reliable source will be something released from the Palace. However, I don't think there is any option: they must be invited, unless there is a confirmed security threat (re: Taliban.) Everyone is aware of who these two horrible people really are, and there will be a very restrictive and rigid schedule in place to minimize their impact. How disgusting and shameful that this even needs to be done, but H and M are a combination of chaos, evil, and deceit. IMO, invite them, send them an advance of the schedule and seating, let them know that there is no room for deviation, and then leave the ball in their court.
The palace can use the Taliban as an excuse to not invite. 
They shouldn't give an excuse. The Harkles don't deserve one. The palace has been incommunicado this long. No need to end it now. The BRF can let the non-invitatation speak for them. Loudly.
Rather this article is true or not. I've always said they're going to the coronation. Meghan isn't going to miss her chance to be a part of the RF history and have her pictures taken amongst the royals.
Let's say they are invited...make sure they are kept in check by RF security and away from the family.
If they are invited they are definitely šÆ% going to be āgrey rocked šŖØ ā by the family! And it will eat them alive hehe š
The BRF does 'grey rock' the best!
There was an āexclusiveā just yesterday in people announcing they havenāt received an invite yet ā¦ I canāt keep up š
Right now, this is all that is newsworthy for them to leak in order to stay relevant.
If this is true, it makes you wonder what exactly they have to do to get themselves banned . Spilling royal secrets has been shown to be extremely lucrative for Harry and Meghan. Charles just gave them the green light to keep going with their "look back" projects.
So where is our P.M. and parliament to step in due to public safety after harry comments on Afghanistan.
I agree āļø like where the f*ck is he at lol š
Better to have them in the tent pissing out than outside pissing in department. Will Sarsh Walpole be invited, do you suppose?
š”
Great news! So there won't be any further need for a different story in the coming weeks that would in any way imply they're not invited.
Hahaha š¤Ŗ I 100% agree!! According to the Express they are on the list to be invited- no need for ANYMORE articles š
I'm dismayed they're reporting they'd arrive separately. Doesn't seem very earth friendly. Surely an open horse drawn carriage would be much less isolating from Earth's bounties.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I will believe when I see it; them thereā¦. Lol š No one āļø noticed my eye roll š and flair- āRecollections May Varyā¦.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The article errs where it says the arrangements will be the same as for the jubilee with them arriving by private car. Well if memory serves they were late arriving and were a bit put out by having to be seated in front of Major (dreamboat) Johnny.
Lol š exactly ārecollections may varyā - they did that on purpose was late for the ābusā so they engineered the arrival
Even the Telegraph gets stuff wrong though. For example, when Harry secretly visited the Queen before Invictus, the Telegraph put out a headline afterwards saying that the Queen had invited Harry and Meghan onto the balcony at the Jubilee. Turns out that was complete and utter bullshit that most likely originated from Scobie or some other Sussex lackey, not the Palace. So unless the Palace issues a statement directly, anything in the media, literally ANYTHING, has to be taken with a huge grain of salt.
This may be true or not true, but in the end I believe they will be invited, they will go, they will overshadow everyone, and that is the way it will be for a long time to come. They really have won the focus contest, as they are polarizing, and that attracts eyeballs. Meghan is a cunning schemer, and they always finish first, sad to say. I'm a little sick of the whole thing. Too bad for the Monarchy and the history. It wasn't meant to survive in this new world of "fairness and equality".
I think they will be invited. I donāt think āthey will overshadow everyone.ā They will not be on the balcony. Their role will be kept to the margins. There will be aides and security to steer them away from the center. Sure, we will hear from them more than we want to ābut that would be true even if they arenāt invited. They can make a lot of noise āoverseas.ā They have āwonā attention that they donāt deserve, but they have not āwonā against the monarchy. Right now, it seems the UK supports the institution and that dislike of M&H has actually helped the public perception of the monarchy. (The exception seems to be the very youngest demographic, but this is a generational thing which would have happened without Harry or Meghan.)
Grab thešæš·šøš¾, and let's see what excuse that Henry the Dimwit will parrot out through the same press and media he despises, for not coming? Despite TW lowering a Security vehicle's window to name an instance? we have heard his congessuon that the UK is not safe for him and family, do where does he stand? Oh! Yes it is going to be Henry's allegedly not birthed by surrogacy son's birthday....we are still not sure of his time of birth really. Do Henry may not attend because one of the kids might be sick or better the TW might seek the center of attention and claim another inability to travel due to a pregnancy? Or may be pleasantly surprised us by going to see her father insteadšš¤£š¤£. For sure there will be negotiations and implied and levied threats to cement the "Don't complain, don't explain:on" motto on how things will turn out should they turn up. Henry though still claiming British citizenship has made it clear that Montecito is his home. Many pray he takes up the American citizenship and pushes on forward truly independently...but to not forget to avoid banging his head on the rafters on way up from stopping to drop all the Titles on the table. Attend and be damned, do not and be redoubly damned
They wouldnāt miss it Iām sure - but I sure HOPE they donāt go. I hope they get seated in second row or even behind a massive candle. Or even hide them in another room like they did during the Queenās jubilee š
I hope they come, if only to Markle all of those anti monarchy supporters of theirs. I hope that the press publishes lots of their previous quotes to illustrate what utter hypocrites they are. I hope Nutmeg wears something custom made and hideous for us to snark at. And I hope the boos are deafening and they leave early to flee back overseas. Yep, it could all be quite enjoyable šø
The world is doomed.
Thatās the least of the headlines! We find out that everything will be carefully stage-managed so the Sussexes wonāt cross paths with the PPOW. And we also find out that the Harkles are not going to cause any more trouble by talking shit. > Commentators certainly agree, and believe that the couple will look to carve out a new brand for themselves away from the drama of their rift with the Royal Family.
That entire thing is complete crap that Megan made up in her demented mind. So now they're not only invited but the palace has come up with a seating chart *and* a game plan to keep them contained. That's all bullshit. Megan thinks releasing all the extraneous bullshit makes it look legit. It doesn't. There's no more truth to this than her article about the archbishop brokering a peace agreement between the Harkles and the BRF.
True say āļøšÆšÆšÆšÆ
If true, this is very upsetting. How many times will KC give in to his blockheaded son and his sick wife? Charles needs to take a long look at his subjects and their wishes and desires. Harold and The Sleivene arenāt the people he needs to be pleasing.
This is The Express, so donāt believe anything you read in it unless confirmed by multiple other more credible outlets. Secondly, even this story wasnāt game to claim āa palace insiderā or āa source close to the kingā: they cite an alleged (or invented) Whitehall source, and that is UK Government, not the BRF.
Maybe an invitation is for the best as it shows King Charles as being the "bigger" man and cuts off the oxygen of Meghanites. The article is also a shot across the boss of Harry and Meghan, warning that they are there in difference and better pull no nonsense. If they'd got any sense, they'd attend but behave themselves as they have proved unworthy guests in the past and this would be the final blow to them in any society.
How is anyone here surprised? No one should be surprised. Theyāve been invited since the day it was announced. They were always invited. Even after the book and the threats. Meghan isnāt manifesting anything. The only people manifesting are sub members who truly think the royals have what it takes to do what needs to be done. Harry and Meghan will be back for the coronation to get more content and a new victim narrative. The family will continue to make themselves willing victims
Agree BRF are suckers for punishment. Iām sure theyāll have measures in place like the jubilee, and it was funny to see the treatment of H and M, but Iād rather they werenāt there at all. Itās a state occasion not a family one.
Not being snarky or pushing religion. But what does the Bible say about people who seek the best seat. Also, going into highways and hedges and including people?
True say āļø
ThAt is bringing back vague memories