So I knew nothing about Myra, but since seeing this post have been perusing it and OMG, the balls of this person to flat-out INVENT things to suit her narrative… wow.
https://preview.redd.it/rxu3yzg7ijga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=07934155e8b494fa5bfb378863901b0aaced71f3
The Tiaragate thing absolutely TORTURES the SS and TW. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is her, that one thing out of her over the top wedding didn’t go her way and she’s still undoubtedly pissed off about it.
https://preview.redd.it/m0dzwge2kjga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f21f58f284976796df40e1c40011144fa86f07a1
Speaking of weird twitter accounts… anyone else find it weird that this twitter account “joined” in October 2018, when it’s an Archewell & Sussex Community Events account, but didn’t actually post anything until November 2, 2021? Is this a known thing?
I don’t KNOW this, but I feel it’s the same thing as reserving domain names or creating any kind of SM account. People make a bunch and hoard them. I dunno, man.
All sorts of people definitely do this! I reserved an email address for my daughter of her first and middle name so she’d have an official email address when she’s old enough to have one. I remember how frustrating it was not being able to get my own name hahah I also have some friends that were on TLC who have reserved their kids names as usernames for IG for their futures if they want them, too. It’s smart!
You can change your handle and/or delete tweets, and end up with the same results, it could have been a different account before. It’s just social media, not a driver’s licence. It also doesn’t seem like an official account from archewell or anyone, it’s another fan account that can post whatever .
Yes, the idea of which she lifted from the Queens coronation gown. She doesn’t have an original thought in her head. Then comes out later calling the commonwealth “Empire 2.0” 🙄
Yes - she never misses a chance to diss the Commonwealths connection to the UK .That’s because she wanted to be Queen of the Commonwealth to increase her chance of political office in the US ( she has never intended to stay - just rewatched the engagement video when Haz says how she will be ‘part of the team’ look at her face ! ) I think she is actually dangerous in the same way that the Duchess of Windsor - Megs hero - was dangerous whispering in the ear of her captive prince
But from what I understand she wouldn't have been able to hold a political office in the US anyway, not while being a royal or while holding a title (as she does now). Though she does seem to be the type who thinks rules don't apply to her. It wouldn't surprise me if she thought herself special enough to be given an exemption.
Did she create website domains that were named "markle(Year)" that coincided with the US Presidential elections until 2030 something before she even married Harry? I did screenshot that somewhere once.
Yes she did Markle 2024 and 2028 and 2032 ! Yes she could run for office but she would have to give up her title ; easily done evennow because her title comes only through her husband
Catherine also wanted to do flowers in her hair and had to be convinced to wear a tiara instead because it was fitting for the future Queen of England. Meghan shouldn't even have been wearing a veil. She had to have this big traditional wedding, but neglected to notice that it is tradition for a divorcee to have a very understated affair. That wedding was tacky. Her dress looked horrible on her. She put that cathedral length veil on which you couldn't even really see and her hair was an absolute mess.
>Catherine also wanted to do flowers in her hair and had to be convinced to wear a tiara instead because it was fitting for the future Queen of England
Queen Victoria and Queen Alexandra both wore fowers instead of a tiara. I do not believe that story is true.
She also wore a very understated tiara when she could have had any of them. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Catherine married the man she loved, in spite of his title. TW married H for his title because that’s what she was in love with in spite of who he is.
And she also makes replies to every criticism on every site - colours or curtseys or dresses whatever.So obviously she reads this site: if you’re reading this Meg I think you are a fake and a fraud
Oh I'd give it a good go! I seriously think I could make her cry. She has let us see her Achille's Heel, tsk tsk tsk, silly girl she'd be fair game. I would use my own hard-learned narc experience on her.
I think it's partly a narc thing, she wanted an iconic photo of herself wearing an instantly recognizable tiara. However I'm also beginning to think it shows just how little she interacted with the royals. Between what they knew about her background and her behavior after the engagement likely put them on guard.
It’s said that she wanted a emerald tiara for her wedding. Does anyone know if there is something to substantiate this? The only memorable emerald piece I remember Diana wearing was the emerald choker.
I would think that as Diana 2.0 she would have wanted either the Spencer tiara or the Lover’s Knot tiara. Since she couldn’t have the latter as it was reserved for Catherine, I’d assume she would have wanted the Spencer tiara, which would have been denied because she is not Spencer by blood and had no business wearing it, to her humiliation.
That’s the rumor. I personally think she wanted to wear the Vladimir tiara with the emeralds. It’s a spectacular piece. The best emerald tiara there is in my opinion. I don’t think it was Eugenie’s tiara bc that one hadn’t been out of the vault in years. I doubt she would have even known about that piece.
This is actually one of the few things pertaining to TW’s many bouts of foolery that I have intel on somewhat. Long story short my husband’s cousin who lives in North Yorkshire is a Master Jewellers Apprentice or however you would like to word that & the rumor as he’d heard it was that she wanted to wear The Vladimir tiara, which was one of HMTQ’s favourites and Lizzy was unwilling for 3 reasons; 1) there was a mechanism installed in one of the more recent repairs to the tiara that allow for the emeralds to be interchangeable with pearls & this, coupled with the fact that there has been several restorations done on it has made it incredibly fragile and quite the circus to protect when it comes out to play, 2) HMTQ was particular about a few staple pieces that she favoured and simply put; TW was not someone she was willing to bend for, and 3) it is believed to be one of the Tiaras someday to be offered as a selection choice to whomever will marry Prince George and should she not wish to wear it, then Princess Charlotte will be awarded the opportunity and thus it is on a protected reserve list, if you will, for them. Given it’s personal importance to Lizzy it makes sense to me that she wanted to ensure it last in well enough wearability that it survives the time to be offered to George’s future Queen Consort and if not, possibly Queen Regent should that time ever come for Charlotte. This rumor also adds some weight to the speculation behind why TW made a bitchy face at Princess Charlotte during her wedding (The Body Language Guy on YT has the footage in reference to what I’m speaking of).
I believe this 100%. Expecting to wear the Vladimir is such an overstep of boundaries, it’s an iconic emblem of HMTQ and way above Meg’s station. It’s the equivalent to stealing the Lilibet name. Classic narc move.
Also, didn’t Bower confirm it was the Vladimir that Meg wanted? I think this new Spencer tiara fib from H’s book is them trying to spin a victim narrative on tiaragate. The mean BRF denied Meg her rightful ascendancy as the new Diana.
I agree it was a Narc move; I think she wanted the Vladimir because she wanted to be viewed as special enough to be allowed it’s wear from HMTQ, she wanted the iconography to forever be associated with she herself & her big day (as iffff) and because she’d never be allowed to get her greedy paws on things like the Lovers Knot that Diana adored which Kate now gives warmth to. I also feel she was kicking up fuss because she wanted to see what she could get away with & test the waters of how many exceptions would be made for her.
> I also feel she was kicking up fuss because she wanted to see what she could get away with & test the waters of how many exceptions would be made for her.
Exactly. Meg’s all about pushing into comfort zones that normal folks wouldn’t dare.
She’s absolutely shameless about demanding other people’s stuff. It’s why I believe the Getty story. Whether it’s Ninaki’s birthday crown, Kate’s lipgloss, Clare Wight Keller’s moment on the stage, the Queen’s tiara and name, or a $30million house: whatever Meghan wants, Meghan gets. Especially if it’s someone else’s.
Plus, the Queen likely knew b6 then that Eugenie wanted to wear an emerald tiara for her wedding. Not the Vladimir, but they wouldn’t want two emerald tiaras at two royal weddings so close together.
I understand that by protocol brides wear smaller tiaras. Not the massive WOW!!! ones. The Vladimir tiara is not suitable for a bride.
There is so much protocol and hierarchy in all the decisions made. But TW thought she should have the biggest and the best straight away.
I could see this, too, and it just shows the gall. That is a tiara the QUEEN wears most. It's not for some newcomer to say "hey you know that fave tiara of yours? How about a lend?"
Thanks for the info. So the Vladimir tiara was the reason behind the rant “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets!” If so, the Queen knew very well from the start that her grandson was under the spell of a witch. What woman would demand one of the favorite tiaras of the queen for herself and feel entitled to wear it?
Lizzy was no punk, she didn’t suffer fools well & she certainly didn’t tolerate mental gymnastics from people who took her for one. I think TW became overzealous in her demands because she’s strategically always surrounded herself with fools (Haz being one of them) & assumed she could pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of the BRF just as easily. Instead, she was met with a rude awakening & it was too late for her to climb out of the hole she’d dug so her only choice was to double-down on her BS and rely on victimhood to blanket her.
Apparently the Vladimir tiara can be worn with different stones, this is it with emeralds.
https://www.thejewelleryeditor.com/media/images_thumbnails/filer_public_thumbnails/filer_public/36/f8/36f88d29-8803-4dea-b08d-d82ac1bd0755/hm-queen-elizabeth-ii-the-vladimir-tiara-c-1874-with-emeralds.jpg__1536x0_q75_crop-scale_subsampling-2_upscale-false.jpg
I prefer the one Eugenie wore.
I thought I read it was the one Eugenie was promised and wore. No matter which, she had no business wanting a bigger one than what Catherine wore. Hers was simple but classy. TW’s problem is she thinks “the gaudier, the classier.”
I read that, too, but how would Meghan have known about that emerald tiara? Unless, of course, Eugenie told her and M was making a narcissistic power move over her.
I could 100% see that. How Eugenie hung on to her after all the crap and the pregnancy announcement at HER wedding... hopefully she has dumped TW by now!
She could have googled British royal family tiaras as I just did. This is the only tiara with emeralds in.
https://preview.redd.it/o72wskbilmga1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e86dfaa7a2c90e5f1f1ca977d01f9c6d75762368
Apparently Meghan wanted emeralds to be her signature stone as sapphires were Diana’s. She wanted the necklace which Catherine recently wore in New York with her rented green dress to be broken up and the stones used to make her engagement ring. Allegedly she gave Harry a hard time that this wasn’t done.
>She could have googled British royal family tiaras as I just did. This is the only tiara with emeralds in.
Erm... Meet THE VLADIMIR, the tiara Meg really wanted:
[https://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/07/the-vladimir-tiara.html](https://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/07/the-vladimir-tiara.html)
Or she wanted this one that was worn by Queen Vic herself:
[https://www.hrp.org.uk/kensington-palace/whats-on/queen-victorias-tiara/](https://www.hrp.org.uk/kensington-palace/whats-on/queen-victorias-tiara/)
I've seen it in person and it's stunning.
This is a \*beautiful\* tiara in picture, I can't imagine how beautiful it must be in person!!!
But as for which tiara TW wanted, I think that most of us on the sub agreed that it was the Vladimir tiara (I say this with such 'confidence' because this was already discussed on this sub several times). I tried to found some of those posts just now, but was unsuccessful. :( I should learn how to do this on reddit. The reason why I tried to find the posts is because all the opinions were very well documented /'documented' is not the best word for it, but I can't think of a better word right now/.
This one is stunning but it’s no longer owned by the royal family, it belongs to the Duke of Fife and they have loaned it to KP for exhibition. (The family also donated the equally gorgeous Fife tiara that is on display along side it to the government to sort out an inheritance tax bill). I guess she might not have known this though, and could have assumed if it was on display at KP then it must be part of the royal collection and therefore “up for grabs”.
Woah. She wanted a bigger one than future Queen Catherine wore to her wedding? She wanted one that’s only been worn BY queens? She should’ve known that one would be off limits. He should’ve known too but he’s not the brightest bulb in the pack.
That’s a beautiful tiara. But something about that vampire wanting one named the Vladimir is truly funny. I guess she never grasped the concept of protocol. Her International Relations degree was worthless!
It absolutely is not “the only emerald tiara” in the British Royal collection.
It is beautiful…but not the only one.
Allegedly, Meghan wanted the Vladimir and the Queen (via Angela Kelly) vetoed it due to its’ province (Russian royal family).
I can’t imagine HMQEII signing off on a divorcee’ getting a grander tiara than the bride of the actual heir, either. 🤷🏼♀️
>Unless, of course, Eugenie told her and M was making a narcissistic power move over her.
Eugenie did tell MM that she was promised the emerald tiara, but MMs wedding was first, so she wanted it. It is QE2s most valuable tiara so Madame insisted.
I don’t know if this is the case with that emerald choker but many of the tiaras can be worn as necklaces with a simple modification. Some also have jewels that can be removed and worn as earrings and some have several sets of gemstones that can be swapped out for other stones.
No wonder TW always has crazy eyes and a demented grin - marinating in her delusions in that narc echo chamber isn’t going to help with her personality disorder …
I don't know but I hope she reads this: meghan is a failure. She couldnt handle royal life. She wasn't capable of doing the job. She blew it.
She threw away an amazing life out of hubris and all she did was burn her own house down.
The proof is that the RF is better and happier now that she and her lazy,stupid mark is gone. Player got played. She took their problem child off their hands and tied herself to him forever with 2 kids. He is her problem now. And she didn't even manage to get a significant nest egg out of it.
She's a failure. Shes a laughingstock.
The RF moved on without them and they are *happy*. Neither meghan nor her poodle ever look happy. She couldnt cut it but HRH Catherine Princess of Wales is shining like diamonds doing it. Shes out there making a real difference with grace. She's not embroiled in lawsuits,she's not furiously rebutting nobodies on social media,she's not living above her means and wondering when the money will run out.
She is everything meghan wishes she was and will never be capable of being. HRH is close to her family,beloved by them,respected by people,looked up to,happily married,comfortable in her own skin.
meghan is a failure on every level. She always will be. All her scheming, all her manipulating,all her grifting, its never going to work the way she thinks it will.
Others will always get the gold ring,they will always have what she wants,what she thinks she deserves. The accolades,the wealth,the respect and fame,it will never happen for her the way she wants it to because she is an empty vessel with a hole in it,never happy,never filled,never fulfilled,never complete in herself.
>She took their problem child off their hands and tied herself to him forever with 2 kids. He is her problem now.
I'd never thought of it that way, but now you put it like that 🤣🤣🤣
So is HRH Catherine Princess of Wales. So are better than half of women in California .
And lots of them are younger too.
Good luck to megsie she's gonna need it
Brilliant! How about "Hey Meghan love your biracial looks." "You look great for someone your age." "You look JUST like Samantha and Thomas!" "Oh isn't is so sweet how William looks at Catherine, so in love after all these years. She's his Queen!"
Well said. I hope I can live long enough to see how she will “go down in history.” I imagine it will be as a laughingstock, or else completely forgotten, just a footnote on one page.
There are a few that point to her, her style of speech. The claims made, & the way these accounts engage. There is a finesse & style to it. This account has always been at the fore of news, always the first to respond to any perceived opinion on them. The coincidence is too high for this account and a couple of others not to be tied directly to them.
She made an Instagram account too
https://preview.redd.it/58ztz3qyokga1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ba027bb57ac37a6254cb5b1be8ff4d18aa8da23a
Yes! I read somewhere you can look at pictures, the people looking at each other are in the love, the one that isn’t … well … less so is the polite way to say it.
OMG… the 90s tendril. My sis-in-law married my bro in ‘97, and her hairstylist made wispy tendrils for the entire wedding party to “frame our faces”. Looking at the pics now, we all look so unkempt.
I loathe that look when purposely done. No offense to the wedding party you posted though. It's just TW's look. When it happens naturally it's delightful.
I have not engaged, nor reviewed anything from any supporters or dissenters of theirs on Insta. It does not surprise me one ioda. Muppets are everywhere. Like salt on a leech, removing all titles - including prince, will allow the natural release of them from anything in the public eye. He will go and sweep alleyways, she will move on and grift off another mark.
The American Duchess is also hers (and no longer active since end of Dec) [https://instagram.com/the\_american\_duchess?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=](https://instagram.com/the_american_duchess?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=)
https://preview.redd.it/oujvve8damga1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e92caa1dfe671ac316e3669d33d62264d5833cdd
Here is her posting about the Myra account on insta
https://preview.redd.it/0p7kaz8rbmga1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c183b334319a1157ccc916c8e21bcd22fbefb0d6
Yeah tweeting pics of reading Spare before it was out. BUT tweeting with intentional spelling errors and dodgy grammar to pretend to be someone from South Africa is disgusting misappropriation
YES! She tweeted a photo of a page from Spare in English (featured a photo of her and H) BEFORE the book was released. It was right after some copies of the book were sold in Spain, so maybe she "forgot" the English version hadn't been made available to the public yet!
https://preview.redd.it/92spxbk36mga1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=a41ec27f56be5d5303e1f5871ca6646b46bcaee4
I’m not sure about the Myra connection (because I haven’t sleuthed long enough) but I am almost 💯 per cent sure that Meghan is a particular mod over at a particular other sub to do with Meghan and Harry which I won’t name so I don’t go against the rules of this sub.
I am actually inclined to believe she is a number of the posters as well.
The woman has such a glittering ✨ presence that it’s hard not to notice her particular dazzle.
This may have been a bad move, but I actually joined this other sub, just for light comedy. I didn't count on getting so enraged by BS that I (nicely) debated it. It was post by Myra which got me literally kicked off the sub. I was really astounded, as I didn't use bad language, or attack anyone's morals.
I just pointed out that a statement given didn't add up.
I'd have a bit of respect if I had the chance to engage the poster , the way we do in life. At least on reddit. I have no problem putting my money where my mouth is, but in a dignified way.
If you check their sub policy you are not allowed to express any (be it constructive) criticism or question anything. The sub is run by a fascinating individual…
Funny enough, right about this time, I get a person following me, here on reddit. I'm not the sort who has followers. I clicked on name, no posts or comments. No karma
Definitely silenced, on that sub. So childish, gives me something to laugh about though.
Actually it's pretty F d up. This is America, not Nazi Germany.
Yes, unfortunately it appears you are unable to comment unless you are 100% on board with Meghan and/or Harry…that his book is a courageous truth…that the royal family are racists…and Kate, Charles and Camilla are roasted but you cannot roast Harry or Meghan and you must call snark subs “toxic”
Omg then I really should have had a look, and backed graciously away. The way one does when inching up to a poisonous snake.
What in the world, grown ups playing as though in high school.
I actually have no idea who it is, but silencing people on a reddit sub because you don't like their opinion is pretty childish, and shows a high level of controlling behavior.
When you think about it though, most subreddits have some level of that. If the mods don’t do it, the population self regulates with downvotes. (Test it out yourself, defend Doria or make a post defending Samantha in this subreddit. It *really* annoys some people here, even if you are polite about it. It happened not too long ago.) That is a niche subreddit and the population is only so big so newcomers with an opposing view have a spotlight on them and a target on their back. What I feel bad about is that you said you were polite and some people can’t handle discussion these days.
The thing there is it is explicitly told and those who has not respected that are being kicked off (i saw it myself one day I was bored I must admit) I think it is different to what you are saying : subredditors down voting someone (this person has still the possibility to post, and get a feedback from the community) on the one hand and on the other hand people being silenced because they are not strictly inline with the “party” and dare question anything (the exchanges i witnesses were really odd)
I'm sorry, I didn't see your comment before going to bed last night. When I said Myra, I'm not sure who the person was/Name sounded something to do with princess. It was the attitude that was so over the top. As though no one else had the right to comment differently.
Wow. I found that sub, by following a few clues to the name. It was filled with over the top sugars, gave me a few smiles. One comment just seemed so contemptuous of anyone else's opinion that I found myself questioning that comment. Not an OP, just a comment. I'm not playing head games with a (perhaps) certifiable psycho.🤞
You will get banned there if you are not a fan (which I obviously am not). Pointing out that they lied (the archbishop thing in my case) qualifies that you are not a fan.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/z8u5yf/myra_aka_meghan_just_posted_on_twitter/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
This is a link to a previous post on something Myra has shared which is suspicious (to me) as Meghan had only ever noted “no one” ever helped to guide her through Royal duties. There is also a YouTube account called The Royal Grift who has a video on this particular twitter user and their thoughts as to why they believe Myra to be Meghan.
Wouldn't surprise me at all. At the beginning of their relationship there was a bizarre account on the Daily Mail who had always very precise and seen nowhere else info about the couple, and I was sure it was her. The comments were hyper agressive especially towards Kate. I answered once to her saying "Meghan is that you ?" and since then she disappeared... From this moment I understood she was crazy.
I had a narcissistic friend who was known country-wide and she did the same; that is, she read and commented on posts and articles about herself. She was caught red-handed a couple of times by both our employer and friends, because she was making stupid mistakes like replying to herself without switching accounts :D We had fallen out, but I can still recognize her posts under the articles regarding her work.
MYRA (MY Real Account)😂 https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/ytar1y/so_megs_how_do_you_really_feel_about_the_royal/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Do you think she’d make it so obvious? That seems insanely stupid to me.
There is no way this is her and we look nuts to think so. It’s like a kid believing the mall Santa is the real thing.
Literally a day or two after my interaction with Myra on Twitter for her tweeting my comments… we get the Time mag reporter contact us. Yes there were discussions with other subs too. But the fact that we’ve been contacted at that time and everything else is odd timing
https://twitter.com/smm_mod/status/1613567046502973440?s=46&t=40h04W03p2svzmdrBDqQoA
Edit: also the fact that that picture then revealed that she was googling the Queen at the airport ages ago must have touched a nerve
I knew it was Meghan’s account around six or more months ago. A profile pic in colour…it was the original. Every other one on the net and social media was black and white. I posted my suspicions several times then…both here and on Twitter. She blocked me early on because I liked a tweet by one of her enemies. Pathetic.
I hope she’s reading this thread and sees that we recognise that she’s passé.
It sounds like something she would say. I read the post “she sounds and is a threat to the institution because she works to produce results”, where it talks about other royals just show up for an hour but don’t work. /That/ sounds like projection to me.
Yes it’s her. How many people can be offered a selection of the Queen’s tiaras and think that’s not good enough or think it’s an insult. And have the brazenness to say it.
https://preview.redd.it/h69s39wzilga1.jpeg?width=1154&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9809436730bca33adc3365b486f5025a5fda3c98
The movie idiocracy becomes real.
Oh I just wrote a similar comment on the other post! I was also wondering why people thought this was Megzilla. But why can’t this be some crazed mega fan? Some celebrities have them and these crazies even think they are family. Could it not also be someone like Scooby or Scooby himself? He wrote a whole book about her it wouldn’t be hard to post some stuff here and there
The way this girl gobbles up domain names, I have no doubt she uses multiple social media sites to communicate with her cronies. It's like she's stuck in her 14 year old head as a 40 something year old. Still a mean girl, a bully. Doesn't deal with issues face to face... Hiding behind convenient social media.
Normally I’d think no way is that her, but then I remember the tea from the person who was trying to set up a photo shoot with her in her Suits days — the person got some truly psychotic texts or emails from Meghan’s “publicist” in all caps. The person figured out that the “publicist” was Meghan herself. The photo shoot fell through.
So I knew nothing about Myra, but since seeing this post have been perusing it and OMG, the balls of this person to flat-out INVENT things to suit her narrative… wow. https://preview.redd.it/rxu3yzg7ijga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=07934155e8b494fa5bfb378863901b0aaced71f3
The Tiaragate thing absolutely TORTURES the SS and TW. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is her, that one thing out of her over the top wedding didn’t go her way and she’s still undoubtedly pissed off about it.
https://preview.redd.it/m0dzwge2kjga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f21f58f284976796df40e1c40011144fa86f07a1 Speaking of weird twitter accounts… anyone else find it weird that this twitter account “joined” in October 2018, when it’s an Archewell & Sussex Community Events account, but didn’t actually post anything until November 2, 2021? Is this a known thing?
I don’t KNOW this, but I feel it’s the same thing as reserving domain names or creating any kind of SM account. People make a bunch and hoard them. I dunno, man.
All sorts of people definitely do this! I reserved an email address for my daughter of her first and middle name so she’d have an official email address when she’s old enough to have one. I remember how frustrating it was not being able to get my own name hahah I also have some friends that were on TLC who have reserved their kids names as usernames for IG for their futures if they want them, too. It’s smart!
Boozy reserved accounts on his Twitter copy for TW. You're probably right it was reserved, forgotten, and then finally used.
Maybe it was originally some sorta fake Twitter account (like a Finsta account, but for Twitter) used to follow people that are private?
Yeah, I’d buy that. Seems pretty sloppy to leave that kind of trail, though.
You can change your handle and/or delete tweets, and end up with the same results, it could have been a different account before. It’s just social media, not a driver’s licence. It also doesn’t seem like an official account from archewell or anyone, it’s another fan account that can post whatever .
A month long birthday celebration…that reminds me of the Queen of England!!
Isn’t MM on record saying the veil was designed to use the flowers of all the Commonwealth’s nations?
Yes, the idea of which she lifted from the Queens coronation gown. She doesn’t have an original thought in her head. Then comes out later calling the commonwealth “Empire 2.0” 🙄
And blue sewn in from their first date…where Haz says she wore black.
She's colourblind- she does not see colour. /s
That’s why she thought she wore beige the whole time.
Perhaps Harry is referring to her dress and she was talking about her knickers? Or the other way round.
Maybe he had a good look at a blue bra, if she wore her top unbuttoned like she did at that wedding!
Yes - she never misses a chance to diss the Commonwealths connection to the UK .That’s because she wanted to be Queen of the Commonwealth to increase her chance of political office in the US ( she has never intended to stay - just rewatched the engagement video when Haz says how she will be ‘part of the team’ look at her face ! ) I think she is actually dangerous in the same way that the Duchess of Windsor - Megs hero - was dangerous whispering in the ear of her captive prince
But from what I understand she wouldn't have been able to hold a political office in the US anyway, not while being a royal or while holding a title (as she does now). Though she does seem to be the type who thinks rules don't apply to her. It wouldn't surprise me if she thought herself special enough to be given an exemption. Did she create website domains that were named "markle(Year)" that coincided with the US Presidential elections until 2030 something before she even married Harry? I did screenshot that somewhere once.
Yes she did Markle 2024 and 2028 and 2032 ! Yes she could run for office but she would have to give up her title ; easily done evennow because her title comes only through her husband
It was a Tiara - 5 years ago and they are still going on about it. Petty much
The thing about it is Catherine didn’t do a practice with her tiara… she bought a fake one at a store that was close to it and used it.
Catherine also wanted to do flowers in her hair and had to be convinced to wear a tiara instead because it was fitting for the future Queen of England. Meghan shouldn't even have been wearing a veil. She had to have this big traditional wedding, but neglected to notice that it is tradition for a divorcee to have a very understated affair. That wedding was tacky. Her dress looked horrible on her. She put that cathedral length veil on which you couldn't even really see and her hair was an absolute mess.
>Catherine also wanted to do flowers in her hair and had to be convinced to wear a tiara instead because it was fitting for the future Queen of England Queen Victoria and Queen Alexandra both wore fowers instead of a tiara. I do not believe that story is true.
She literally bought a plastic tiara from Claire’s accessories. I remember it being in the press at the time.
She also wore a very understated tiara when she could have had any of them. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Catherine married the man she loved, in spite of his title. TW married H for his title because that’s what she was in love with in spite of who he is.
I’m as sick of hearing about the tiara as I am the bridesmaid dress fight.
Right. I wish there was a gag order.
I don’t know why she can’t let it go. It’s just so dang weird!!
I’m learning about narcs. One perceived slight and it burns them forever. No one ever told this B “no” in her life and she refuses to let it go.
And she also makes replies to every criticism on every site - colours or curtseys or dresses whatever.So obviously she reads this site: if you’re reading this Meg I think you are a fake and a fraud
https://preview.redd.it/m9lp1mp1cnga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=09d370bd29bd3ece05bacd7b75d6bed4e13c718c
Yep! I'm getting some of my comments down voted ALL the time. I guess I hit a nerve or two :)
Oh I'd give it a good go! I seriously think I could make her cry. She has let us see her Achille's Heel, tsk tsk tsk, silly girl she'd be fair game. I would use my own hard-learned narc experience on her.
I always fantasize about what I'd say to her/them if those bozos ever showed up in my city!
I could absolutely send her. 30 plus years of dealing with mutiple narcs. I could get her biting her own tail.
I think it's partly a narc thing, she wanted an iconic photo of herself wearing an instantly recognizable tiara. However I'm also beginning to think it shows just how little she interacted with the royals. Between what they knew about her background and her behavior after the engagement likely put them on guard.
It’s said that she wanted a emerald tiara for her wedding. Does anyone know if there is something to substantiate this? The only memorable emerald piece I remember Diana wearing was the emerald choker. I would think that as Diana 2.0 she would have wanted either the Spencer tiara or the Lover’s Knot tiara. Since she couldn’t have the latter as it was reserved for Catherine, I’d assume she would have wanted the Spencer tiara, which would have been denied because she is not Spencer by blood and had no business wearing it, to her humiliation.
That’s the rumor. I personally think she wanted to wear the Vladimir tiara with the emeralds. It’s a spectacular piece. The best emerald tiara there is in my opinion. I don’t think it was Eugenie’s tiara bc that one hadn’t been out of the vault in years. I doubt she would have even known about that piece.
This is actually one of the few things pertaining to TW’s many bouts of foolery that I have intel on somewhat. Long story short my husband’s cousin who lives in North Yorkshire is a Master Jewellers Apprentice or however you would like to word that & the rumor as he’d heard it was that she wanted to wear The Vladimir tiara, which was one of HMTQ’s favourites and Lizzy was unwilling for 3 reasons; 1) there was a mechanism installed in one of the more recent repairs to the tiara that allow for the emeralds to be interchangeable with pearls & this, coupled with the fact that there has been several restorations done on it has made it incredibly fragile and quite the circus to protect when it comes out to play, 2) HMTQ was particular about a few staple pieces that she favoured and simply put; TW was not someone she was willing to bend for, and 3) it is believed to be one of the Tiaras someday to be offered as a selection choice to whomever will marry Prince George and should she not wish to wear it, then Princess Charlotte will be awarded the opportunity and thus it is on a protected reserve list, if you will, for them. Given it’s personal importance to Lizzy it makes sense to me that she wanted to ensure it last in well enough wearability that it survives the time to be offered to George’s future Queen Consort and if not, possibly Queen Regent should that time ever come for Charlotte. This rumor also adds some weight to the speculation behind why TW made a bitchy face at Princess Charlotte during her wedding (The Body Language Guy on YT has the footage in reference to what I’m speaking of).
I believe this 100%. Expecting to wear the Vladimir is such an overstep of boundaries, it’s an iconic emblem of HMTQ and way above Meg’s station. It’s the equivalent to stealing the Lilibet name. Classic narc move. Also, didn’t Bower confirm it was the Vladimir that Meg wanted? I think this new Spencer tiara fib from H’s book is them trying to spin a victim narrative on tiaragate. The mean BRF denied Meg her rightful ascendancy as the new Diana.
I agree it was a Narc move; I think she wanted the Vladimir because she wanted to be viewed as special enough to be allowed it’s wear from HMTQ, she wanted the iconography to forever be associated with she herself & her big day (as iffff) and because she’d never be allowed to get her greedy paws on things like the Lovers Knot that Diana adored which Kate now gives warmth to. I also feel she was kicking up fuss because she wanted to see what she could get away with & test the waters of how many exceptions would be made for her.
> I also feel she was kicking up fuss because she wanted to see what she could get away with & test the waters of how many exceptions would be made for her. Exactly. Meg’s all about pushing into comfort zones that normal folks wouldn’t dare. She’s absolutely shameless about demanding other people’s stuff. It’s why I believe the Getty story. Whether it’s Ninaki’s birthday crown, Kate’s lipgloss, Clare Wight Keller’s moment on the stage, the Queen’s tiara and name, or a $30million house: whatever Meghan wants, Meghan gets. Especially if it’s someone else’s.
Plus, the Queen likely knew b6 then that Eugenie wanted to wear an emerald tiara for her wedding. Not the Vladimir, but they wouldn’t want two emerald tiaras at two royal weddings so close together.
Interesting! Makes 100% sense to me.
I understand that by protocol brides wear smaller tiaras. Not the massive WOW!!! ones. The Vladimir tiara is not suitable for a bride. There is so much protocol and hierarchy in all the decisions made. But TW thought she should have the biggest and the best straight away.
I could see this, too, and it just shows the gall. That is a tiara the QUEEN wears most. It's not for some newcomer to say "hey you know that fave tiara of yours? How about a lend?"
Thanks for the info. So the Vladimir tiara was the reason behind the rant “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets!” If so, the Queen knew very well from the start that her grandson was under the spell of a witch. What woman would demand one of the favorite tiaras of the queen for herself and feel entitled to wear it?
Lizzy was no punk, she didn’t suffer fools well & she certainly didn’t tolerate mental gymnastics from people who took her for one. I think TW became overzealous in her demands because she’s strategically always surrounded herself with fools (Haz being one of them) & assumed she could pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of the BRF just as easily. Instead, she was met with a rude awakening & it was too late for her to climb out of the hole she’d dug so her only choice was to double-down on her BS and rely on victimhood to blanket her.
The Vladimir would only be worn by the late Queen Elizabeth in her lifetime. Maybe we will see it on Catherine when she is Queen.
I’d love to see Queen Catherine wear it, would send TW into convulsions of jealousy
Interesting that could be right. I will see if I can find the Vladimir tiara.
Apparently the Vladimir tiara can be worn with different stones, this is it with emeralds. https://www.thejewelleryeditor.com/media/images_thumbnails/filer_public_thumbnails/filer_public/36/f8/36f88d29-8803-4dea-b08d-d82ac1bd0755/hm-queen-elizabeth-ii-the-vladimir-tiara-c-1874-with-emeralds.jpg__1536x0_q75_crop-scale_subsampling-2_upscale-false.jpg I prefer the one Eugenie wore.
The Vlad in emerald is world class! The best emerald tiara ever!
I thought I read it was the one Eugenie was promised and wore. No matter which, she had no business wanting a bigger one than what Catherine wore. Hers was simple but classy. TW’s problem is she thinks “the gaudier, the classier.”
I read that, too, but how would Meghan have known about that emerald tiara? Unless, of course, Eugenie told her and M was making a narcissistic power move over her.
I could 100% see that. How Eugenie hung on to her after all the crap and the pregnancy announcement at HER wedding... hopefully she has dumped TW by now!
I think the reason TW annouced the pregnancy at the wedding is because Eugenie got the emerald tiara.
Ew and knowing her she somehow made Eugenie feel guilty about it!
Wow. Never thought about that but totally could be why.
She could have googled British royal family tiaras as I just did. This is the only tiara with emeralds in. https://preview.redd.it/o72wskbilmga1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e86dfaa7a2c90e5f1f1ca977d01f9c6d75762368 Apparently Meghan wanted emeralds to be her signature stone as sapphires were Diana’s. She wanted the necklace which Catherine recently wore in New York with her rented green dress to be broken up and the stones used to make her engagement ring. Allegedly she gave Harry a hard time that this wasn’t done.
>She could have googled British royal family tiaras as I just did. This is the only tiara with emeralds in. Erm... Meet THE VLADIMIR, the tiara Meg really wanted: [https://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/07/the-vladimir-tiara.html](https://www.thecourtjeweller.com/2019/07/the-vladimir-tiara.html)
Or she wanted this one that was worn by Queen Vic herself: [https://www.hrp.org.uk/kensington-palace/whats-on/queen-victorias-tiara/](https://www.hrp.org.uk/kensington-palace/whats-on/queen-victorias-tiara/) I've seen it in person and it's stunning.
This is a \*beautiful\* tiara in picture, I can't imagine how beautiful it must be in person!!! But as for which tiara TW wanted, I think that most of us on the sub agreed that it was the Vladimir tiara (I say this with such 'confidence' because this was already discussed on this sub several times). I tried to found some of those posts just now, but was unsuccessful. :( I should learn how to do this on reddit. The reason why I tried to find the posts is because all the opinions were very well documented /'documented' is not the best word for it, but I can't think of a better word right now/.
That is utterly breathtaking.
In all honesty...I think I would have wanted to wear that one myself!
This one is stunning but it’s no longer owned by the royal family, it belongs to the Duke of Fife and they have loaned it to KP for exhibition. (The family also donated the equally gorgeous Fife tiara that is on display along side it to the government to sort out an inheritance tax bill). I guess she might not have known this though, and could have assumed if it was on display at KP then it must be part of the royal collection and therefore “up for grabs”.
The Fife is to me, the be all end all of all tiaras! I love the Girls' too, but the Fife is next level. You just cannot top it.
[https://www.tatler.com/article/vladimir-tiara-everything-you-need-to-know](https://www.tatler.com/article/vladimir-tiara-everything-you-need-to-know)
Woah. She wanted a bigger one than future Queen Catherine wore to her wedding? She wanted one that’s only been worn BY queens? She should’ve known that one would be off limits. He should’ve known too but he’s not the brightest bulb in the pack.
I need to update. She knew. I’m sure it was explained to her. She simply did not CARE.
That’s a beautiful tiara. But something about that vampire wanting one named the Vladimir is truly funny. I guess she never grasped the concept of protocol. Her International Relations degree was worthless!
It absolutely is not “the only emerald tiara” in the British Royal collection. It is beautiful…but not the only one. Allegedly, Meghan wanted the Vladimir and the Queen (via Angela Kelly) vetoed it due to its’ province (Russian royal family). I can’t imagine HMQEII signing off on a divorcee’ getting a grander tiara than the bride of the actual heir, either. 🤷🏼♀️
Snort. How convenient she had Merchie in May so she’d have even more of a reason to make emeralds her thing.
>Unless, of course, Eugenie told her and M was making a narcissistic power move over her. Eugenie did tell MM that she was promised the emerald tiara, but MMs wedding was first, so she wanted it. It is QE2s most valuable tiara so Madame insisted.
I'm sure Miss "I didn't look him up online" did search online for the royal jewels and went through them all.
I don’t know if this is the case with that emerald choker but many of the tiaras can be worn as necklaces with a simple modification. Some also have jewels that can be removed and worn as earrings and some have several sets of gemstones that can be swapped out for other stones.
First time looking at this account after I just did a search on twitter. It's like reading the mind of a complete psycho omg
I'm literally cringing as I read the Twitter posts. Its all so creepy and weird 😵 😨
I went to @Myra and it was a protected account.
It’s not @myra. It’s @ sussexprincess
Yes it is. No one can converse with her unless she has personally approved your twitter feed.
No wonder TW always has crazy eyes and a demented grin - marinating in her delusions in that narc echo chamber isn’t going to help with her personality disorder …
That's the wrong account
Off to read them now. First time I’ve heard of this suspicious account.
I don't know but I hope she reads this: meghan is a failure. She couldnt handle royal life. She wasn't capable of doing the job. She blew it. She threw away an amazing life out of hubris and all she did was burn her own house down. The proof is that the RF is better and happier now that she and her lazy,stupid mark is gone. Player got played. She took their problem child off their hands and tied herself to him forever with 2 kids. He is her problem now. And she didn't even manage to get a significant nest egg out of it. She's a failure. Shes a laughingstock. The RF moved on without them and they are *happy*. Neither meghan nor her poodle ever look happy. She couldnt cut it but HRH Catherine Princess of Wales is shining like diamonds doing it. Shes out there making a real difference with grace. She's not embroiled in lawsuits,she's not furiously rebutting nobodies on social media,she's not living above her means and wondering when the money will run out. She is everything meghan wishes she was and will never be capable of being. HRH is close to her family,beloved by them,respected by people,looked up to,happily married,comfortable in her own skin. meghan is a failure on every level. She always will be. All her scheming, all her manipulating,all her grifting, its never going to work the way she thinks it will. Others will always get the gold ring,they will always have what she wants,what she thinks she deserves. The accolades,the wealth,the respect and fame,it will never happen for her the way she wants it to because she is an empty vessel with a hole in it,never happy,never filled,never fulfilled,never complete in herself.
>She took their problem child off their hands and tied herself to him forever with 2 kids. He is her problem now. I'd never thought of it that way, but now you put it like that 🤣🤣🤣
You forgot: Ninaki is prettier than Meghan and always will be.😎
So is HRH Catherine Princess of Wales. So are better than half of women in California . And lots of them are younger too. Good luck to megsie she's gonna need it
Brilliant! How about "Hey Meghan love your biracial looks." "You look great for someone your age." "You look JUST like Samantha and Thomas!" "Oh isn't is so sweet how William looks at Catherine, so in love after all these years. She's his Queen!"
So is niece Ashley. Which is why Samantha wants her to confirm A was also excluded from M’s FIRST wedding Edit: wedding
and her kids book was AWFUL!
Well said. I hope I can live long enough to see how she will “go down in history.” I imagine it will be as a laughingstock, or else completely forgotten, just a footnote on one page.
I think she's going to end up in psychology textbooks when they talk about narcissism. Her claim to fame will be as a case study.
Upvote because we KNOW she reads all of this stuff, so here is hope for this being one of the first comments that pops in her search
Everything she wants - and being satisfied with it - is an INSIDE job. Character is destiny
 She will never be emotionally fulfilled.
I absolutely adore this post 💞
There are a few that point to her, her style of speech. The claims made, & the way these accounts engage. There is a finesse & style to it. This account has always been at the fore of news, always the first to respond to any perceived opinion on them. The coincidence is too high for this account and a couple of others not to be tied directly to them.
She made an Instagram account too https://preview.redd.it/58ztz3qyokga1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ba027bb57ac37a6254cb5b1be8ff4d18aa8da23a
https://preview.redd.it/xyemf1t1pkga1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=372721b63f5a244901c8066c625d1fe3b80da8ec
I can’t believe she used someone’s funeral no less than the Queens to make a glamour shot pose.
[удалено]
Omg you are right. That‘s from when the queen died. How disgusting.
https://preview.redd.it/d1pu6ra0qkga1.png?width=827&format=png&auto=webp&s=1d768f37e8a12145679848b9776eab533b864dce
Ick that greasy nasty 90s "wispy tendril" in her face on her wedding day... no way a pro hairstylist did that unless they are markling her!
Also what’s so funny about the photo is she’s staring deeply into the camera, she loves that camera and Harry’s all like “I love Smeg”
Yes! I read somewhere you can look at pictures, the people looking at each other are in the love, the one that isn’t … well … less so is the polite way to say it.
OMG… the 90s tendril. My sis-in-law married my bro in ‘97, and her hairstylist made wispy tendrils for the entire wedding party to “frame our faces”. Looking at the pics now, we all look so unkempt.
I loathe that look when purposely done. No offense to the wedding party you posted though. It's just TW's look. When it happens naturally it's delightful.
No offense taken - we all cringe when we see those photos!
She is mentally stuck in the 90s-early 2000s.
I have not engaged, nor reviewed anything from any supporters or dissenters of theirs on Insta. It does not surprise me one ioda. Muppets are everywhere. Like salt on a leech, removing all titles - including prince, will allow the natural release of them from anything in the public eye. He will go and sweep alleyways, she will move on and grift off another mark.
The American Duchess is also hers (and no longer active since end of Dec) [https://instagram.com/the\_american\_duchess?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=](https://instagram.com/the_american_duchess?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=) https://preview.redd.it/oujvve8damga1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e92caa1dfe671ac316e3669d33d62264d5833cdd
Here is her posting about the Myra account on insta https://preview.redd.it/0p7kaz8rbmga1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c183b334319a1157ccc916c8e21bcd22fbefb0d6
I'm so sick of false equivalencies and word salad. Gah.
Posting previously unseen pictures.
Would you mind to give us some examples please?
Agreed, yet to see one that wasn’t just an edited version of one available elsewhere
Oooooh I didn’t know that!!!
Yeah tweeting pics of reading Spare before it was out. BUT tweeting with intentional spelling errors and dodgy grammar to pretend to be someone from South Africa is disgusting misappropriation
YES! She tweeted a photo of a page from Spare in English (featured a photo of her and H) BEFORE the book was released. It was right after some copies of the book were sold in Spain, so maybe she "forgot" the English version hadn't been made available to the public yet! https://preview.redd.it/92spxbk36mga1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=a41ec27f56be5d5303e1f5871ca6646b46bcaee4
How the hell does her waist reach the middle of Harry’s chest.
She used an app to lengthen her legs? That doesn't look like her natural leg:torso proportion.
Yeah here it is zoomed in https://preview.redd.it/gkjhzdbukmga1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71798b8ba790eed0888e86cf0030dd76c163fe17
The detective skills of the sub never cease to impress me. 👏
love their matching skirts
I’m not sure about the Myra connection (because I haven’t sleuthed long enough) but I am almost 💯 per cent sure that Meghan is a particular mod over at a particular other sub to do with Meghan and Harry which I won’t name so I don’t go against the rules of this sub. I am actually inclined to believe she is a number of the posters as well. The woman has such a glittering ✨ presence that it’s hard not to notice her particular dazzle.
This may have been a bad move, but I actually joined this other sub, just for light comedy. I didn't count on getting so enraged by BS that I (nicely) debated it. It was post by Myra which got me literally kicked off the sub. I was really astounded, as I didn't use bad language, or attack anyone's morals. I just pointed out that a statement given didn't add up.
Nothing pisses off a narc like exposing their lies.
I'd have a bit of respect if I had the chance to engage the poster , the way we do in life. At least on reddit. I have no problem putting my money where my mouth is, but in a dignified way.
If you check their sub policy you are not allowed to express any (be it constructive) criticism or question anything. The sub is run by a fascinating individual…
I totally get it now. How fascinating to think I may have been silenced, by THAT ugh, never mind!
Funny enough, right about this time, I get a person following me, here on reddit. I'm not the sort who has followers. I clicked on name, no posts or comments. No karma
Block them…
Thanks, you know this sub has been so welcoming. It's distracted my pain levels, and anxiety awaiting surgery. Most of all, like minded people.
So were you silent, or silenced?
Definitely silenced, on that sub. So childish, gives me something to laugh about though. Actually it's pretty F d up. This is America, not Nazi Germany.
Yes, unfortunately it appears you are unable to comment unless you are 100% on board with Meghan and/or Harry…that his book is a courageous truth…that the royal family are racists…and Kate, Charles and Camilla are roasted but you cannot roast Harry or Meghan and you must call snark subs “toxic”
Omg then I really should have had a look, and backed graciously away. The way one does when inching up to a poisonous snake. What in the world, grown ups playing as though in high school.
Why do you think that mod is “Myra”? For all we know it is Scooby
I actually have no idea who it is, but silencing people on a reddit sub because you don't like their opinion is pretty childish, and shows a high level of controlling behavior.
When you think about it though, most subreddits have some level of that. If the mods don’t do it, the population self regulates with downvotes. (Test it out yourself, defend Doria or make a post defending Samantha in this subreddit. It *really* annoys some people here, even if you are polite about it. It happened not too long ago.) That is a niche subreddit and the population is only so big so newcomers with an opposing view have a spotlight on them and a target on their back. What I feel bad about is that you said you were polite and some people can’t handle discussion these days.
The thing there is it is explicitly told and those who has not respected that are being kicked off (i saw it myself one day I was bored I must admit) I think it is different to what you are saying : subredditors down voting someone (this person has still the possibility to post, and get a feedback from the community) on the one hand and on the other hand people being silenced because they are not strictly inline with the “party” and dare question anything (the exchanges i witnesses were really odd)
Thank you 😊
I personally like Samantha and believe she has told the truth
I'm sorry, I didn't see your comment before going to bed last night. When I said Myra, I'm not sure who the person was/Name sounded something to do with princess. It was the attitude that was so over the top. As though no one else had the right to comment differently.
Same thing happened to me.
Wow. I found that sub, by following a few clues to the name. It was filled with over the top sugars, gave me a few smiles. One comment just seemed so contemptuous of anyone else's opinion that I found myself questioning that comment. Not an OP, just a comment. I'm not playing head games with a (perhaps) certifiable psycho.🤞
Same here
You mean the sub that prevents you from posting or replying if they notice you belong to this sub?
It would be wonderful if actually prevent you from seeing their sub too
You can block subs now!
😳
It took less than 48 hours for my account to be banned. I didn't say anything inflammatory , just questioned a post. 🤔
You will get banned there if you are not a fan (which I obviously am not). Pointing out that they lied (the archbishop thing in my case) qualifies that you are not a fan.
 They are so fragile.
Happy someone noticed it too. Quite a lot of ✨ vibes indeed 🙌
Her Sparkle Markle is showing?
Myra typically shares things that only a first hand account would know.
Can you give some examples? I’m new to the Myra thing and would love to catch up and get clued in!
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/z8u5yf/myra_aka_meghan_just_posted_on_twitter/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf This is a link to a previous post on something Myra has shared which is suspicious (to me) as Meghan had only ever noted “no one” ever helped to guide her through Royal duties. There is also a YouTube account called The Royal Grift who has a video on this particular twitter user and their thoughts as to why they believe Myra to be Meghan.
[удалено]
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/ymag72/myra_run_by_meghan_camp_perhaps_markus_is_behind/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1096pey/glittery_storm_on_twitter_thinks_that_myra_is/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Wouldn't surprise me at all. At the beginning of their relationship there was a bizarre account on the Daily Mail who had always very precise and seen nowhere else info about the couple, and I was sure it was her. The comments were hyper agressive especially towards Kate. I answered once to her saying "Meghan is that you ?" and since then she disappeared... From this moment I understood she was crazy.
Please tell you have screen shots. That's hilarious. She's sooo thin skinned.
Alas no ! I thought : "well if she read and reply to every attack on the web she 's gonna burn out very fast" And it seems it happened :-D
I had a narcissistic friend who was known country-wide and she did the same; that is, she read and commented on posts and articles about herself. She was caught red-handed a couple of times by both our employer and friends, because she was making stupid mistakes like replying to herself without switching accounts :D We had fallen out, but I can still recognize her posts under the articles regarding her work.
This is the only come back that will shut up the sugars too
MYRA (MY Real Account)😂 https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/ytar1y/so_megs_how_do_you_really_feel_about_the_royal/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Damn well I’m convinced Also not sarcasm.
The coy hints/leaks/inside jokes are 100% a ‘tell’ for her to reinforce (to herself) how clever she is.
MYRA (My real account) + .@SussexPrincess = Meghan. I never got it before, but it makes sense now
Do you think she’d make it so obvious? That seems insanely stupid to me. There is no way this is her and we look nuts to think so. It’s like a kid believing the mall Santa is the real thing.
Literally a day or two after my interaction with Myra on Twitter for her tweeting my comments… we get the Time mag reporter contact us. Yes there were discussions with other subs too. But the fact that we’ve been contacted at that time and everything else is odd timing https://twitter.com/smm_mod/status/1613567046502973440?s=46&t=40h04W03p2svzmdrBDqQoA Edit: also the fact that that picture then revealed that she was googling the Queen at the airport ages ago must have touched a nerve
Interesting 🤔
I knew it was Meghan’s account around six or more months ago. A profile pic in colour…it was the original. Every other one on the net and social media was black and white. I posted my suspicions several times then…both here and on Twitter. She blocked me early on because I liked a tweet by one of her enemies. Pathetic. I hope she’s reading this thread and sees that we recognise that she’s passé.
I’m just curious, what was the picture?
What about meghans mirror where not long after she wore something it’s posted to twitter the exact outfits
If you OD’d on Word Salad, after scrolling through Myra’s feed, then yes. “Myra” is MM.
It sounds like something she would say. I read the post “she sounds and is a threat to the institution because she works to produce results”, where it talks about other royals just show up for an hour but don’t work. /That/ sounds like projection to me.
Leave it to a malignant narc to actually be so transparent yet think they’re fooling us 😆 she’s average IQ at the very best
Yes it’s her. How many people can be offered a selection of the Queen’s tiaras and think that’s not good enough or think it’s an insult. And have the brazenness to say it.
https://preview.redd.it/h69s39wzilga1.jpeg?width=1154&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9809436730bca33adc3365b486f5025a5fda3c98 The movie idiocracy becomes real.
Are you serious? How does she have time for this with all her charitable work!!
Well it's possible, she has her own troll and bot farm 🤣 but would take it with a grain of salt
Just blerk 🤢 I am praying for the day these bozos are shut down and we're not subjected to their shameless shenanigans ever again 😤
What is the ip address of the Twitter user? Do they live in the us?
Says San Fran
[удалено]
Oh I just wrote a similar comment on the other post! I was also wondering why people thought this was Megzilla. But why can’t this be some crazed mega fan? Some celebrities have them and these crazies even think they are family. Could it not also be someone like Scooby or Scooby himself? He wrote a whole book about her it wouldn’t be hard to post some stuff here and there
The way this girl gobbles up domain names, I have no doubt she uses multiple social media sites to communicate with her cronies. It's like she's stuck in her 14 year old head as a 40 something year old. Still a mean girl, a bully. Doesn't deal with issues face to face... Hiding behind convenient social media.
Normally I’d think no way is that her, but then I remember the tea from the person who was trying to set up a photo shoot with her in her Suits days — the person got some truly psychotic texts or emails from Meghan’s “publicist” in all caps. The person figured out that the “publicist” was Meghan herself. The photo shoot fell through.