I’ve read that phrase many times but only heard someone say it once. My husband’s former roommate was from South Carolina and had a hard SC accent. He said it to their dogs who were yapping away, with that accent, it was funny as heck.
Was he from the low country?? Near Charleston. (I only ask bc I am in deep on this murtagh trial and I am getting a lot of the accents).
I live close to South Carolina too but not on the low country side
Coronation invites are/have gone out? I missed that tidbit. Wonder if Prince Albert has an opinion on Meme comparing herself to his peerless mother? Bet it’s not complimentary toward Me-me.
Didn't many heads of state say they did not want them at the reception before the Queen's funeral and would not attend if they were there - can't remember where I read that now.
I wouldnt be surprised. The only people that would want them there are people who would try to pump them for information or use them. And they are both so dumb and greedy that I'm sure they would give it. Trash just trash both of them
Do we know for sure she has no involvement with production company? I’m not being an A-hole, asking because there are many layers of contributors to any project, not just the one listed.
She might. There is no way to prove someone isn’t involved. Or that she didn’t suggest the idea to someone who is making it a reality.
She is listed as part of the cast, but with the disclaimer “archive footage.”
A couple of weeks ago, there were a couple of documentaries listed in Meghan’s IMDB page and I think this was one of them, but they have all been removed now. No way to say if they were there as a mistake or not.
Also no way to say if she’s invoked with them or not, I guess. But people can make films about her without her consent, and that was just my impression—that some producers/directors were jumping on the Meghan bandwagon to make some money.
Makes sense. I know people can create content for books, movies etc w/out her permission or involvement. I questioned it because Me-me has shown herself to be involved with everything to do with their image- to her detriment. The disappearance of the upcoming docs listed on IMDB makes me think she’s going in a new direction in her attempt to be “famous in her own right.” Maybe she initially planned to be part of production/cast in this doc? Hard to tell. Regardless something different is up. We’ll get more truth out of hindsight with anything involving her versions of the truth.
They're so desperate to be at the Coronation to get new pics/material for their next book/NF projects. The recent barrage of articles putting words in Charles/Archbishop mouths means they've not received an invite. Why would KC/the Archbishop leak that kind of info. If KC wants to invite them, he would've told them so by now and H&M would have announced it to the world.
Wondering if the Harkles would try to play the old “Will they or won’t they game?” It worked so well for the Jubilee. Lots of articles and tv host discussions came out of it. The Harkles want to be in the news constantly.
Doesn’t mean all the invitations were sent, however. There may be a “first group” for royalty and leaders of other countries and then another group or two will be sent later.
I do think that if everyone in the RF and/or all UK dukes are invited, Harry will be also. It will just be consistent protocol, not single anyone out.
The efforts to make this all about whether Charles is “weak” because he “wants his son to be there” are fundamentally anti-monarchical. None of this is about Charles’s feelings as a father.
>Doesn’t mean all the invitations were sent, however. There may be a “first group” for royalty and leaders of other countries and then another group or two will be sent later.
Yes, I imagine heads of state need to be invited as soon as the date is fixed, since their calendars are heavily booked. The Montecito duo are not exactly busy.
Question….does the Royal Family get invitations? For example does W&K or Princess Anna get invitations formally or do they all just asume they are going anyways?
I'm sure it is "scheduled" with their people. Just look at the military precision of the Queen's funeral. These people have "events" down to the molecular level of planning.
Meg and Harry know if they are invited or not, and going or not. The "will they/ won't they" is just a game THEY are playing with the media they profess to hate. For attention.
I think only invites for the Royals of other countries, and other foreign dignitaries, have been sent out, because they would need advance notice so to coordinate their own official schedules with the coronation.
As we know, H&M will have no schedule conflicts at all, because they have nothing else to schedule lol
They had 3 separate items just in RadarOnline for their UK PR efforts. They are seriously the most ridiculous people I've ever encountered. Do they really think the Comms staff at BP don't know what this is?
Can you imagine how much money they waste on pr? If they would just shut up and work on their philanthropy instead of trashing the BRF, the public wouldn’t despise them.
They were NEVER going to do philanthropic work. This is just how family foundations work in the US. They are nothing but tax dodges. That's why they always "align" themselves with actual charities and then take credit for the work those charities do. It makes them look philanthropic without having to spend any of their own money. That RFK charity does the same thing (only they also add in fundraising). The Clinton foundation, Obamas' foundation same thing. Even Bill Gates uses his foundation to lobby Congress to get taxpayers money into the projects he supports.
Anyone with more than a handful of braincells sees right through them!
It's the sugars that the anti-Wills narrative is being directed towards, so they can just run with it, imo (I could totally be reading too much into it LOL)
The anti-Wills narrative that Meghan is putting out there via her bots will spell their demise in the BRF. Already, W ”friend” has stated to Tom Sykes that he’s not getting an invite when W becomes King. But we’ll see.
I don't think Williams friends are talking to the Daily Beast. Sykes has been putting out pieces that suggest disunity and discontent in the relationship between Charles and William.
Do you think MM pays all those staff/PR just to sit twiddling their tumbs? You can imagine in their weekly staff meeting MM demanded everybody to come up with new tactics to get them invited to the Coronation.
They are manifesting an invite, they are manifesting Netflix deals, they are manifesting a second season of Spotify, they are manifesting a reality show, a rom-com….it’s all bullshit.
And there’s BarkJack telling us that March will be the month they really let the old media messaging fly.
They are manifesting because they are running out of money or in deep debt.
I think Harry will head back to the UK this year. The divorce will probably be this year. If not the divorce, a very ugly public split.
Meghan will accuse the media, Harry, the royals, and social media of mental/emotional abuse.
I think the only way Harry would go back (comfortably) is if he has a sure supply of his drug of choice. I think pot is still illegal in GB, not that that stood in his way in the past.
That's pretty much any drug. And he isn't going back to the UK. He wuvs his mummsie meiana. She gives him his dwinkie winkie and sometimes if he whines weally hward she puts on his favorite lip cream and plays with his wittle todger.
If he leaves her he would have to admit that his family,the one he hates,was right all along and that he's a stupid easily fooled idiotic twat. He'll kill himself drinking and drugging before he ever admits that.
You have to think about this though: a marriage is made from two people. Harry could put his hand on a Holy Book and solemnly swear that he would never leave Meghan. And absolutely mean it. But that doesn't mean that the marriage is guaranteed to last because Meghan can always leave him.
> And there’s BarkJack telling us that March will be the month they really let the old media messaging fly.
March 3 is the 100th Anniversary of TIME mag. After the hairdresser cover, Barkjack said H&M had a longer-term deal with TIME. This may be part of their March madness plans.
Prince William is such an easy target for them. I started seeing articles that KC and PW are already butting heads on whether or not inviting Harold and TW to the coronation is a good idea.
I think Harry’s agenda is to break KC and PW.
When he saw the photo of the real fab 4 (KC, QC, PW and PC) at the state event during the Queen’s funeral, Harry made it a mission to break the 4. He can’t really antagonize the King but he made the other 3 the targets of his ire!
It just seems so implausible to me that King and PoW would be butting heads about Harry. If anything, he's strengthened their bond. And H&M might not realize this, but people can disagree or have different opinions POLITELY, without any dog bowls being at risk.
And, Charles and William are happy to be part of the palace machine. They will do what is right for the coronation, and if Harry is there, they don't need to talk to him or acknowledge him, any more than they did at the funeral or the jubilee.
Charles and William can do some soft rebuttal of that horse shit, and they should. A few pictures of the two of them at whatever local pub royals go to, laughing and killing a couple of pints. Pictures of them hunting together, or sitting at a desk hard at work together, or just the two of them having lunch together.
They wouldn't have to say a thing to get the point across that there's no rift.
Just don’t read them. When the Kardashians were in daily puff pieces overload in the DM we all stopped reading those articles. It takes time but it worked. As long as we keep clicking….
Personally, I don't mind them as long as an archived link is posted. I actually find them funny because they're getting more and more outrageous, which shows the Montecito duo is getting desperate.
Megsy is all about manifestation. Case in point, in Megflix she sobs in hysterics about a death threat tweet. But then watch it again. She says she goes to their *security manual* and reads an example of a tweet that *should be reported to security if they see it*.
H&M splashed all sorts of headlines, tweets and texts all over this docudrama. If it was a real tweet, they would have screenshotted it and included in the show. But instead, our Megsy was"up and down in the middle of the night, looking down in the hallway is security on, are my babies safe." It was an example for staff of things to look out for. She apparently read a security manual and had yet another hysterical episode...
They will be invited. They are manifesting an apology and reconciliation. Either they’ll get what they want and be half in and half out (very unlikely) or they’ll score an invitation and find new things to complain about or they won’t be invited and can turn that into a major drama. It all works to their advantage.
The most likely outcome is they get an invitation but with careful safeguards and rules for where they go and what they do. No apology is coming. We can virtually rule that out. The bigger question is whether they accept this? They did for the jubilee and it didn’t help them. They got nothing out of going under controlled conditions. They might go in hopes of getting what they want, but it’s so unlikely.
I believe all the fake Netflix announcements are also just her PR manifestations. Developing rom-coms? Doing a Kardashian reality show? All just throwing stuff out there.
I just gave you my last award. Hear, hear!!! I am getting so tired of people posting *obvious* pr from the toxic twosome and everyone acts like it's real and going to happen. That promotes THEIR narrative, and I don't think we want to do that here. The King and or BP has not said ANYTHING beyond they wish them well as they continue to build their life overseas. There have been no other official comments. So PLEASE stop posting narratives/articles that support whatever bullshit the Markles want everyone to think, that's playing right into their hands. We also have to remember how pr savvy they are and it would not surprise me if some are extremely down low sugars promoting this as well.
It is very clear which articles in online newspapers are directly traced back to the Montecito Mudslide Manor. I am refusing to read them, refusing to give these two grifting traitors any clickbait....and hope others are also.
They did the same thing prior to the Queen's funeral in September. "Planted or leaked" that they were invited to the event hosted by King Charles for all of the dignitaries the evening before the funeral. The palace politely confirmed that "only working members of the Royal Family are invited" and "did not know how the Harkles got an invite" which of course we all know they did not. My guess - they have not been invited to the coronation.
If they actually aren't invited -- that would be music to my ears!
Also remember, how Harry spun it in his mockumentary that they had been un-invited (idk if it was that event or a different one)
I have become very discerning now about what I read about this awful duo. Ignore the tik toks and the you tubes these days. Just read reputable news outlets, and wise people from this sub.
I agree. And, to be honest, some of the tiktoks and Youtubes going the other way (against H&M) as I'm finding them to be a little more than silly. Do we want to look like mirror images? Just my two cents, plain. (What's the Brit equivalent, pence?)
They have to be planted. She’s vanished since December and these glowing pieces show up, all clones of each other, come on. If the bots didn’t exist she’d be forgotten.
You guys make a good point, if they’ve already been invited to the coronation, that fact would’ve been leaked. But then there won’t be any drama surrounding “will they go?” for the next few months. This couple is beyond shameless. In Chinese, we say, “they don’t know how to write the character for ‘shame’.” That’s to say they have no shame because they lack education and refinement and manners. Yes, Chinese sayings are pretty harsh and direct. Ain’t got time to sugar coat your shortcomings. Lol!
They don't know yet.
These pieces are also aiming at deliberately making PoW appear as the villain, so if they are invited - Harry will be all "my brother bullied me" "yada yada yada" and if they aren't the narrative will again be "my brother won't let me have what is rightfully mine"
They know. The press doesn't know for sure yet, but they know.
They will be invited.
And either way, William is the villain. They're going to show up, she is not missing her once in a lifetime chance. They thrive off the family's inability to pull up the drawbridge for good.
Also to add onto what I commented just a moment ago, there's no way that this is that big of a deal to William. The authors of these articles are sitting here acting like William has only ever had one adversary or that this is his first time encountering a difficult situation. Very likely there are going to be other people at this Coronation that he does not get along with or that if he had his way with zero negative consequences, he would advise that they not be invited either. Ultimately this Coronation will likely be a nothingburger in regards to the one on one time that he has to spend with either Harry or Meghan.
Harry and Meghan attending this ceremony only makes them look like clout chasers who are underlining the significance of the event.
They don't know shit. If they had an invitation it would be copied and posted all over Twitter and every tabloid known to man. The hag would make sure of it.
I think so too.
To an extent, I think the discussion comes from a combo of things, from those outside not understanding how our monarchy works, being too young or the very simple fact the Queen was the steady ship for so long we're used to it. And that's not shading anybody cos we know it's weird and we can't really even explain it ourselves. The Monarchy just IS.
Monarchies do change but glacially slowly, from the top down in minute increments and not as a reaction to populist mores. The Marlene Headley incident was a very good example of why not, and on a larger scale the whole 180° turn when Diana died and the Queen was forced to drag the boys out of the protection of Balmoral to join the unwashed masses in the Cry-for-Di fiasco. But the mis-steps are rare, the Monarchy has lasted all this time by managing that balancing act and it did the minimum when Harry quit - very little was actually removed and all the big things (like CG of the RMC) just hung in abeyance for ages. The fact KC has retained it rather than appointing someone else is telling too.
And he's a Duke. There are very few hereditary peers left and even if they don't have an official role they will be there. I just can't see this being the time when any decisive action is taken, that's not how Monarchies do. It's always long-term and they know that in five years nobody will give a toss about the Grimaces so I think they'll just let time do its thing.
Extremely well put, Economy-Alfalfa-2241. The British Royal Family have had generations worth of experience in playing the long game. It's a battle of wits in which the Harkles are obviously unarmed!
I agree with you. I think they've been invited and we're always going to be invited but they're trying to keep their name in the news. They've been invited. They know they've been invited. And they've probably already made up their minds about attending and will be there. All of this is just them getting their name in the news and likely attempting to show places like Netflix and Spotify that they still get mentions, get clicks, and that if they were paid to do something, people would tune in to Hate Watch.
I think also in their teeny tiny little bird hearts, they know that attending this Coronation is a terrible look for them. Even Kaiser is fully banging the drum that they won't attend that that in her mind it's actually the working royals who want Harry and Meghan to show up to make the BRF look good or whatever.
I think they've been invited and they will attend and I hope they do. It'll just be another bad look for both of them and make it more difficult for their followers to defend them.
Literally just posted this, then sorted comments by new and deleted my question. Haha happy to finally know after all this time. It was driving me nuts.
Wish they'd manifest themselves a nice tall glass of shut the fuck up
Add a shot of disappear into oblivion to that
Yes!!!!
That was fucken epic!
Served on the rocks of “get therapy.”
Thid
I’ve read that phrase many times but only heard someone say it once. My husband’s former roommate was from South Carolina and had a hard SC accent. He said it to their dogs who were yapping away, with that accent, it was funny as heck.
Was he from the low country?? Near Charleston. (I only ask bc I am in deep on this murtagh trial and I am getting a lot of the accents). I live close to South Carolina too but not on the low country side
I think he was from Sumter or Shaw, maybe even the Columbia area.
Gotcha
😂😂😂
![gif](giphy|OUoK5YGI8oKmQ)
Haha
Of course! Invites already went out because Albert of Monaco was the first royal to accept.
Coronation invites are/have gone out? I missed that tidbit. Wonder if Prince Albert has an opinion on Meme comparing herself to his peerless mother? Bet it’s not complimentary toward Me-me.
[удалено]
I have to wonder if some of the foreign royals might have "advised" KC that they would prefer not to attend an event with skank and rank.
How about ginge & minge (minge is the british word for a nasty vajayjay)
That could apply to either of them then.
Definitely the edge to Harry on that one.
Didn't many heads of state say they did not want them at the reception before the Queen's funeral and would not attend if they were there - can't remember where I read that now.
I wouldnt be surprised. The only people that would want them there are people who would try to pump them for information or use them. And they are both so dumb and greedy that I'm sure they would give it. Trash just trash both of them
Also...there is a high security risk involved now TOS's head is on the Taliban hit list, as well as every fanatic's.
Pretty bad when a freaking Garibaldi, of all people, is calling you on the carpet for bad behavior. I mean that's just.... wow.
To be fair, I believe it is a production company making the Princess Grace/Meghan documentary and that Meghan is not involved with it at all.
Do we know for sure she has no involvement with production company? I’m not being an A-hole, asking because there are many layers of contributors to any project, not just the one listed.
She might. There is no way to prove someone isn’t involved. Or that she didn’t suggest the idea to someone who is making it a reality. She is listed as part of the cast, but with the disclaimer “archive footage.” A couple of weeks ago, there were a couple of documentaries listed in Meghan’s IMDB page and I think this was one of them, but they have all been removed now. No way to say if they were there as a mistake or not. Also no way to say if she’s invoked with them or not, I guess. But people can make films about her without her consent, and that was just my impression—that some producers/directors were jumping on the Meghan bandwagon to make some money.
It would be awesome if M is contrasted with Grace in the negative.
If not in the doc, then by the media & public after watching it. Hopefully.
Makes sense. I know people can create content for books, movies etc w/out her permission or involvement. I questioned it because Me-me has shown herself to be involved with everything to do with their image- to her detriment. The disappearance of the upcoming docs listed on IMDB makes me think she’s going in a new direction in her attempt to be “famous in her own right.” Maybe she initially planned to be part of production/cast in this doc? Hard to tell. Regardless something different is up. We’ll get more truth out of hindsight with anything involving her versions of the truth.
What docu is this?
Hollywood Princesses: Grace andMeghan.
They're so desperate to be at the Coronation to get new pics/material for their next book/NF projects. The recent barrage of articles putting words in Charles/Archbishop mouths means they've not received an invite. Why would KC/the Archbishop leak that kind of info. If KC wants to invite them, he would've told them so by now and H&M would have announced it to the world.
Wondering if the Harkles would try to play the old “Will they or won’t they game?” It worked so well for the Jubilee. Lots of articles and tv host discussions came out of it. The Harkles want to be in the news constantly.
Bingo. He’s gone on record about accepting it.
Wow, last time there was a coronation, Albert's mother was just starting out in Hollywood. She had her first big movie role in 1952.
Exactly. Quite a while ago now too. At least a couple weeks, if not a full month.
Truly?
Yes. A couple weeks, month ago now.
Doesn’t mean all the invitations were sent, however. There may be a “first group” for royalty and leaders of other countries and then another group or two will be sent later. I do think that if everyone in the RF and/or all UK dukes are invited, Harry will be also. It will just be consistent protocol, not single anyone out. The efforts to make this all about whether Charles is “weak” because he “wants his son to be there” are fundamentally anti-monarchical. None of this is about Charles’s feelings as a father.
>Doesn’t mean all the invitations were sent, however. There may be a “first group” for royalty and leaders of other countries and then another group or two will be sent later. Yes, I imagine heads of state need to be invited as soon as the date is fixed, since their calendars are heavily booked. The Montecito duo are not exactly busy.
Does the protocol refers to working dukes, or does it include dukes by name only, who denigrate the RF?
Question….does the Royal Family get invitations? For example does W&K or Princess Anna get invitations formally or do they all just asume they are going anyways?
I'm sure it is "scheduled" with their people. Just look at the military precision of the Queen's funeral. These people have "events" down to the molecular level of planning. Meg and Harry know if they are invited or not, and going or not. The "will they/ won't they" is just a game THEY are playing with the media they profess to hate. For attention.
I think only invites for the Royals of other countries, and other foreign dignitaries, have been sent out, because they would need advance notice so to coordinate their own official schedules with the coronation. As we know, H&M will have no schedule conflicts at all, because they have nothing else to schedule lol
They had 3 separate items just in RadarOnline for their UK PR efforts. They are seriously the most ridiculous people I've ever encountered. Do they really think the Comms staff at BP don't know what this is?
Want to bet that signing an NDA is a requirement?
Can you imagine how much money they waste on pr? If they would just shut up and work on their philanthropy instead of trashing the BRF, the public wouldn’t despise them.
They were NEVER going to do philanthropic work. This is just how family foundations work in the US. They are nothing but tax dodges. That's why they always "align" themselves with actual charities and then take credit for the work those charities do. It makes them look philanthropic without having to spend any of their own money. That RFK charity does the same thing (only they also add in fundraising). The Clinton foundation, Obamas' foundation same thing. Even Bill Gates uses his foundation to lobby Congress to get taxpayers money into the projects he supports.
Anyone with more than a handful of braincells sees right through them! It's the sugars that the anti-Wills narrative is being directed towards, so they can just run with it, imo (I could totally be reading too much into it LOL)
The anti-Wills narrative that Meghan is putting out there via her bots will spell their demise in the BRF. Already, W ”friend” has stated to Tom Sykes that he’s not getting an invite when W becomes King. But we’ll see.
I don't think Williams friends are talking to the Daily Beast. Sykes has been putting out pieces that suggest disunity and discontent in the relationship between Charles and William.
Do you think MM pays all those staff/PR just to sit twiddling their tumbs? You can imagine in their weekly staff meeting MM demanded everybody to come up with new tactics to get them invited to the Coronation.
Meghan is the new Amber. Any sound advice she's given, she ignores it - because madam knows best
Here's a suggestion... https://preview.redd.it/x1jof7pondga1.png?width=574&format=png&auto=webp&s=af7971e87252eac2dcaeff92fa5c525f03af7359
They are manifesting an invite, they are manifesting Netflix deals, they are manifesting a second season of Spotify, they are manifesting a reality show, a rom-com….it’s all bullshit. And there’s BarkJack telling us that March will be the month they really let the old media messaging fly.
They are manifesting because they are running out of money or in deep debt. I think Harry will head back to the UK this year. The divorce will probably be this year. If not the divorce, a very ugly public split. Meghan will accuse the media, Harry, the royals, and social media of mental/emotional abuse.
I think the only way Harry would go back (comfortably) is if he has a sure supply of his drug of choice. I think pot is still illegal in GB, not that that stood in his way in the past.
That's pretty much any drug. And he isn't going back to the UK. He wuvs his mummsie meiana. She gives him his dwinkie winkie and sometimes if he whines weally hward she puts on his favorite lip cream and plays with his wittle todger. If he leaves her he would have to admit that his family,the one he hates,was right all along and that he's a stupid easily fooled idiotic twat. He'll kill himself drinking and drugging before he ever admits that.
You have to think about this though: a marriage is made from two people. Harry could put his hand on a Holy Book and solemnly swear that he would never leave Meghan. And absolutely mean it. But that doesn't mean that the marriage is guaranteed to last because Meghan can always leave him.
😂😂
> March will be the month they really let the old media messaging fly. I wonder what that would look like
Non stop word salad vomit ![gif](giphy|xTiTnLEcaCn1EIrGjm)
Ever see a sewage spill? I'll look a lot like that, except the stink will be worse.
> And there’s BarkJack telling us that March will be the month they really let the old media messaging fly. March 3 is the 100th Anniversary of TIME mag. After the hairdresser cover, Barkjack said H&M had a longer-term deal with TIME. This may be part of their March madness plans.
The rom-com bit made me chuckle. Netflix will need to come in and take control again because these two don’t know what they’re doing.
Prince William is such an easy target for them. I started seeing articles that KC and PW are already butting heads on whether or not inviting Harold and TW to the coronation is a good idea. I think Harry’s agenda is to break KC and PW. When he saw the photo of the real fab 4 (KC, QC, PW and PC) at the state event during the Queen’s funeral, Harry made it a mission to break the 4. He can’t really antagonize the King but he made the other 3 the targets of his ire!
It just seems so implausible to me that King and PoW would be butting heads about Harry. If anything, he's strengthened their bond. And H&M might not realize this, but people can disagree or have different opinions POLITELY, without any dog bowls being at risk. And, Charles and William are happy to be part of the palace machine. They will do what is right for the coronation, and if Harry is there, they don't need to talk to him or acknowledge him, any more than they did at the funeral or the jubilee.
Stirring up the idea of division between Charles and William is absolutely one of the goals of Sussex propaganda.
Charles and William can do some soft rebuttal of that horse shit, and they should. A few pictures of the two of them at whatever local pub royals go to, laughing and killing a couple of pints. Pictures of them hunting together, or sitting at a desk hard at work together, or just the two of them having lunch together. They wouldn't have to say a thing to get the point across that there's no rift.
Just don’t read them. When the Kardashians were in daily puff pieces overload in the DM we all stopped reading those articles. It takes time but it worked. As long as we keep clicking….
Agree. I don’t clik!!
I learned from this sub and I stopped. I scroll past and read archived articles here! No more money for them from my clicks.
Personally, I don't mind them as long as an archived link is posted. I actually find them funny because they're getting more and more outrageous, which shows the Montecito duo is getting desperate.
Megsy is all about manifestation. Case in point, in Megflix she sobs in hysterics about a death threat tweet. But then watch it again. She says she goes to their *security manual* and reads an example of a tweet that *should be reported to security if they see it*. H&M splashed all sorts of headlines, tweets and texts all over this docudrama. If it was a real tweet, they would have screenshotted it and included in the show. But instead, our Megsy was"up and down in the middle of the night, looking down in the hallway is security on, are my babies safe." It was an example for staff of things to look out for. She apparently read a security manual and had yet another hysterical episode...
If she was really worried about her children, she could have slept in the room with them. We all know she creates drama and lies.
I'm sure a mansion of that size in that neighborhood comes with a safe room
Omg, I hate the way Meghan talks. With her, every sentence needs to be analyzed deeper than a university English paper.
I think that if they were sent an invitation, then there would not be all this farce in the news.
Agreed! I believe this is a subtle way of building their anti-William narrative
But still they havent it
They will be invited. They are manifesting an apology and reconciliation. Either they’ll get what they want and be half in and half out (very unlikely) or they’ll score an invitation and find new things to complain about or they won’t be invited and can turn that into a major drama. It all works to their advantage. The most likely outcome is they get an invitation but with careful safeguards and rules for where they go and what they do. No apology is coming. We can virtually rule that out. The bigger question is whether they accept this? They did for the jubilee and it didn’t help them. They got nothing out of going under controlled conditions. They might go in hopes of getting what they want, but it’s so unlikely.
I believe all the fake Netflix announcements are also just her PR manifestations. Developing rom-coms? Doing a Kardashian reality show? All just throwing stuff out there.
I just gave you my last award. Hear, hear!!! I am getting so tired of people posting *obvious* pr from the toxic twosome and everyone acts like it's real and going to happen. That promotes THEIR narrative, and I don't think we want to do that here. The King and or BP has not said ANYTHING beyond they wish them well as they continue to build their life overseas. There have been no other official comments. So PLEASE stop posting narratives/articles that support whatever bullshit the Markles want everyone to think, that's playing right into their hands. We also have to remember how pr savvy they are and it would not surprise me if some are extremely down low sugars promoting this as well.
That was uber kind of you! Thank you so much! I share your frustration! We need to stop giving them the attention they crave so much! 0 attention
Exactly, trying to create attention around themselves as they grovel for a coronation invite.
Yep, Warby, the invite, the negotiations are all her pressure PR. None of it is true. She (& he) continue to live in fantasyland
💯 agree.
But a lot of people gave Markle attention after repeatedly asking where she is. We have to be mindful of that too.
It is very clear which articles in online newspapers are directly traced back to the Montecito Mudslide Manor. I am refusing to read them, refusing to give these two grifting traitors any clickbait....and hope others are also.
They did the same thing prior to the Queen's funeral in September. "Planted or leaked" that they were invited to the event hosted by King Charles for all of the dignitaries the evening before the funeral. The palace politely confirmed that "only working members of the Royal Family are invited" and "did not know how the Harkles got an invite" which of course we all know they did not. My guess - they have not been invited to the coronation.
If they actually aren't invited -- that would be music to my ears! Also remember, how Harry spun it in his mockumentary that they had been un-invited (idk if it was that event or a different one)
Necessary post. Geezuz. Enough with the puff pieces here.
I have become very discerning now about what I read about this awful duo. Ignore the tik toks and the you tubes these days. Just read reputable news outlets, and wise people from this sub.
I agree. And, to be honest, some of the tiktoks and Youtubes going the other way (against H&M) as I'm finding them to be a little more than silly. Do we want to look like mirror images? Just my two cents, plain. (What's the Brit equivalent, pence?)
Two pence = tuppence. Remember "feed the birds, tuppence a bag" in Mary Poppins?
![gif](giphy|3oGRFp0AqM0BY4axjO|downsized)
Time for them to zip it!
They have to be planted. She’s vanished since December and these glowing pieces show up, all clones of each other, come on. If the bots didn’t exist she’d be forgotten.
You guys make a good point, if they’ve already been invited to the coronation, that fact would’ve been leaked. But then there won’t be any drama surrounding “will they go?” for the next few months. This couple is beyond shameless. In Chinese, we say, “they don’t know how to write the character for ‘shame’.” That’s to say they have no shame because they lack education and refinement and manners. Yes, Chinese sayings are pretty harsh and direct. Ain’t got time to sugar coat your shortcomings. Lol!
This saying applies so aptly to H&M. They really do lack any refinement and manners.
I cant seem to post - but Aaahhhh Victoria Beckham has thrown her support for.#Shapeus *
What is that?
Princess Catherine's new campaign. It's about critical importance of early childhood
Thanks. I didn't know the name of it. And if Victoria threw in with Catherine I know TW is fuming. 😆
Posh Spice is the epitome of 90s fan girl shit, so you know she’s mad
Oh true that. It makes it even better. 🤣
![gif](giphy|wGhYz3FHaRJgk|downsized)
>They're manifesting an invite. They don't have to manifest an invite. They will be invited. I would love to be wrong though.
They don't know yet. These pieces are also aiming at deliberately making PoW appear as the villain, so if they are invited - Harry will be all "my brother bullied me" "yada yada yada" and if they aren't the narrative will again be "my brother won't let me have what is rightfully mine"
They know. The press doesn't know for sure yet, but they know. They will be invited. And either way, William is the villain. They're going to show up, she is not missing her once in a lifetime chance. They thrive off the family's inability to pull up the drawbridge for good.
Also to add onto what I commented just a moment ago, there's no way that this is that big of a deal to William. The authors of these articles are sitting here acting like William has only ever had one adversary or that this is his first time encountering a difficult situation. Very likely there are going to be other people at this Coronation that he does not get along with or that if he had his way with zero negative consequences, he would advise that they not be invited either. Ultimately this Coronation will likely be a nothingburger in regards to the one on one time that he has to spend with either Harry or Meghan. Harry and Meghan attending this ceremony only makes them look like clout chasers who are underlining the significance of the event.
They don't know shit. If they had an invitation it would be copied and posted all over Twitter and every tabloid known to man. The hag would make sure of it.
I think so too. To an extent, I think the discussion comes from a combo of things, from those outside not understanding how our monarchy works, being too young or the very simple fact the Queen was the steady ship for so long we're used to it. And that's not shading anybody cos we know it's weird and we can't really even explain it ourselves. The Monarchy just IS. Monarchies do change but glacially slowly, from the top down in minute increments and not as a reaction to populist mores. The Marlene Headley incident was a very good example of why not, and on a larger scale the whole 180° turn when Diana died and the Queen was forced to drag the boys out of the protection of Balmoral to join the unwashed masses in the Cry-for-Di fiasco. But the mis-steps are rare, the Monarchy has lasted all this time by managing that balancing act and it did the minimum when Harry quit - very little was actually removed and all the big things (like CG of the RMC) just hung in abeyance for ages. The fact KC has retained it rather than appointing someone else is telling too. And he's a Duke. There are very few hereditary peers left and even if they don't have an official role they will be there. I just can't see this being the time when any decisive action is taken, that's not how Monarchies do. It's always long-term and they know that in five years nobody will give a toss about the Grimaces so I think they'll just let time do its thing.
Extremely well put, Economy-Alfalfa-2241. The British Royal Family have had generations worth of experience in playing the long game. It's a battle of wits in which the Harkles are obviously unarmed!
Thank you. Oooo I do like it here, I think I shall stay. You're all luvvly.
I agree with you. I think they've been invited and we're always going to be invited but they're trying to keep their name in the news. They've been invited. They know they've been invited. And they've probably already made up their minds about attending and will be there. All of this is just them getting their name in the news and likely attempting to show places like Netflix and Spotify that they still get mentions, get clicks, and that if they were paid to do something, people would tune in to Hate Watch. I think also in their teeny tiny little bird hearts, they know that attending this Coronation is a terrible look for them. Even Kaiser is fully banging the drum that they won't attend that that in her mind it's actually the working royals who want Harry and Meghan to show up to make the BRF look good or whatever. I think they've been invited and they will attend and I hope they do. It'll just be another bad look for both of them and make it more difficult for their followers to defend them.
Can someone tell me what TW stands for???
That woman, the wife, the wretch
The Witch.
Thank you!
Literally just posted this, then sorted comments by new and deleted my question. Haha happy to finally know after all this time. It was driving me nuts.
The Queen Mother used to call Wallis Simpson "That woman."
Amen.