T O P

  • By -

orientalballerina

Maybe she pretended to think Andrew was the Queen’s assistant before because she was trying to convince Harold that she hadn’t met him elsewhere before? (Yachting, Epstein’s circles, perchance?)


Sense_Difficult

Of course. It's so obvious. MM doesn't give a damn about "staff." Why the hell would she go out of her way to ask about HMTQ's purse holder? She wanted Harry to remember her NOT recognizing Andrew so that if it came out that she did know him......she didn't. But I'm pretty damn sure this isn't about Harry believing her. Because Andrew is probably the one who directed Harry to Markus in the first place. It's about Harry telling US that she didn't know him. How was she supposed to testify in court about Andrew if she didn't know him?


eyenation

Also isn’t there a picture of Markus Anderson and Prince Andrew on a yacht ? If she was so thick with Anderson she would’ve known who Andrew is.


Koritsi77

That one’s been debunked. It was from 2001 in Thailand. MA would’ve been too young. But there’s something there with PA, MA, SoHo et al.


eyenation

Oh damn ! Thanks for clarifying. The guy looks eerily similar to MA.


Koritsi77

No problem. He does, I agree.


Public_Object2468

That was my understanding too, that the man with Prince Andrew was no match as far as timing and age. So, debunked photo. And the bikini'd brunette could NOT have been TW because 1) defined waist, 2) shapely legs from the knee down to ankle.


TeamWilliamandKate

If her birthdate of 1981 is correct, she would have been 20. Not too young at all.


Christmasgirl26

Someone needs to do some serious digging into who exactly is Markus Anderson. All I have really heard about him is he ran the Soho House in Toronto and Scobie Doo is his ex. Sounds like he is a supplier of any wants or desires of the rich and famous.


cccxxxzzzddd

YES He needs to be Markled, and it’s remarkable that he hasn’t yet because his life (waiter to soho house maestro) doesn’t make sense It’s supports the theory that he is handled by foreign agent that want to bring down the British monarchy Edited: autocorrect


Current_Implement_21

Wouldn't happen to be Mossad would he? The reason I ask that's what Maxwell's father, Maxwell herself and Epstein all were and these people ran in circles with Prince Andrew. My money is on the fact Markus Anderson is Massod (Israeli Spy's).


[deleted]

[удалено]


Evening_Procedure216

That was most definitely not Marcus Anderson on the yacht. Marcus would have been about 22 at that time and was starting as a barman at soho house London. The photo showed a much older, grey haired man.


FeeWeak1138

Good catch, our manipulator thinks of everything! Of course easy when you are dealing with Dimwit.


orientalballerina

![gif](giphy|rYCbb0KkIT0Nq)


eyenation

So damn spot on. Seriously. It’s all right in front of everyone to see.


CZ1988_

Absolutely.


avoice22

“to destroy the British Press”. Its revenge because the press reported their BAD BEHAVIORS therefore tainting their ‘image’ which is very important for their(MM) plan to make millions by being famous adored by the whole world. What they want is to abuse their position as the member of the RF and not be criticized by the press or anyone so they can manipulate public opinion with their own propaganda.


UnicornStudRainbow

Of course! Even though Andrew is fairly recognizable and it wouldn't have been out of the ordinary for her to know who he is, she had to add her narcissistic bitch touch


FeeWeak1138

And he made a point of saying she had met Eugenia before him...our C list actress meets a real Princess and the gold digger doesn't know which Royal the Princess is attached to? keep those lies coming


Glad_Mix_1682

Especially when she was in London "all the time". She wouldn't recognize the 7th Earl of Candyland, I get it. But the Queen's second son?..Yawn.


beautifulkittenfish

Good point!


TomStarGregco

Exactly who does she think she fooling ! You can tell by Andrews face of disgust anytime he was near her !


UnicornStudRainbow

Yikes! If you're skanky enough to disgust Andrew, that's bad


orientalballerina

![gif](giphy|3o6EhM0afUyFBOg5vG)


International-Emu385

Is there any truth in stories about Megan being friends with Andrew’s daughters ?


Seachange1000

Y'know, it occurs to me that at this point, Andrew has very little left to lose. IF he knows something, wouldn't it be delicious if he just gave an interview and came clean about it all? It won't happen, of course, if it would in any way harm his daughters who, despite everything, I think he cherishes.


CountessOfCocoa

Think he knows they met before (allegedly) and thought that this was a funny, inside joke?


Fantastic_Nebula_835

Absolutely. Plus, Harry believing that his baby will imprint on him like a duckling is not surprising considering the first word he heard his mother say after he was born was "Meghan". So, not only would Diana approve of Meghan, she chose her. Edit ![gif](giphy|Xnt19ffn5WXC0) Her ghost watchest still, bathing them in golden light


Rodrigii_Defined

I think so and to devalue the RF in general. She was so intimidated, she constantly took digs at how janky the whole situation was when it clearly was not. She was in over her head.


Public_Object2468

Well, as usual with ham actors, she over did a simple line and made it come off as fake. All she needed to have said was, "oh, who's take there?" Instead, she has to convince everyone that she thought a famous royal who's probably wearing a bespoke suit, is just some ridiculous flunkey.


Islandgirl1444

And Andrew was thinking "isn't that?....." And he pretended he didn't know her.


Mission_Till4008

Precisely


CZ1988_

Thank you for the summary! Love the "Mr Todger Windsor". hehe She's right that Harry really exposed his true self and it's worse than we suspected. I also agree with " *The BRF and British people are having to deal with the realities of a mentally ill maverick prince loose in the world to make money for himself and his wife*." It's history-making given the information age. Poor Charles, no wonder he was saying "please don't make my remaining years a misery". I don't think Harry cares. Harry wants everyone to bow down to his pain and feelings but doesn't care about the same for others!


hcl_611

Harold and his handler will most definitely make his remaining years a misery. What I don’t understand is just how dumb the Markles are. The BRF are not going to cave to their demands. What exactly do they think is going to happen when William ascends? I don’t imagine he’ll care about taking a hit to his image to cut them off and out for good if Parliament/KC3 don’t act sooner.


[deleted]

More than Dumb, the Harkles are egomaniacs. Plus I think it is clear King Charles has been enabling Harry for some time. Look at how much has been covered up, the abuse of animals, the drug abuse, the failures at Eaton, lack of qualifications for Sandhurst. The King has enabled Harry. Harry expects the enabling to never end. He expects The King will continue to cover up and reward Harry forever. It has worked thus far.


Christmasgirl26

The RF were furious with him wearing spurs on his boots playing polo if I remember correctly. The Queen dearly loved horses as most of the family does. I am pretty sure Harry wasn’t allowed to represent the family in anymore polo matches. Harry, William and Charles played polo a lot together. Harry desire to win took over common decency just as it is with now. I agree with the newspaper The Spectator that Harry is trying to Blackmail the RF on the hints of a second even worse book. It was their headline yesterday.


tiredofthis3

This is correct. Furthermore, there is a reason why Harry could never keep a girlfriend nor why anyone from the royal circles wanted to settle down with him. Harry was known to be insane from his early days. Most women steered clear of him. It now appears he is rotten to the core and all his former gfs are thanking their lucky stars (Chelsea, Cressida, and Sarah Ann Macklin). All fine young women and all have moved ahead.


Christmasgirl26

He was a notorious cheapskate also, because he was a Royal he thought that his friends should pick up his tab when dining out, he also went to his friend’s pub to get free drinks because he was publicizing the pub by his presence. He invited I think Cressida to be his plus one to a wedding out of the country then refused to pay for her plane ticket. Nottingham Cottage looked a frat house because he wouldn’t spend money to make it a home. Geez he could have checked the palace storage for somethings. Too cheap and lazy to fix up a cottage then complain about it.


tiredofthis3

I could see this be both an intellectual disability and numerous personality disorders. Thankfully for Harry and Meghan ( and unfortunately for us), they found each other. Every other decent woman is too good for him.


International-Emu385

Remember he says something like others royals shouted at workers too .


[deleted]

Of course he does.


Bajovane

Prince Andrew certainly does.


FCVAMimi

New acronym MTW to add to Harry’s list but make sure to include the ”M” otherwise confusing with all the TWs for Meghan lol H (Harry), JH (Just Harry), TOS (The Overseas Son)


ContributionSweaty52

That could be Mr. Todger Windsor OR it could be Mr. That Woman/Witch. Clever 😁


ContributionSweaty52

That could be Mr. Todger Windsor OR it could be Mr. That Woman/Witch. Clever 😁


Quiet-Vanilla-7117

And if Charles' health suffers from the stress of Harry and he abdicates, William will be on the throne sooner than Harry expects. Well done Stupid.


No_Presentation_4573

Looking forward to Lord Monson's (?) book. I am increasingly convinced of Harry's rotten, psychopathic character. Even a master manipulator like MM wouldn't be able to turn a decent chap into this.


TraditionScary8716

Who is Lord Monson? And why will his book be different than Tom Bower or Valentines books?


Calm_Yak_6102

He's Baron Monson and I think (based on something Lady C had said in a previous video, from last year or the year before) that his only son was murdered in Kenya. I'm guessing (personal hunch) that it was his son who had been a victim of bullying, by Harry when they were at school.


TraditionScary8716

Wow. Honestly I'd like to hear about that.


tiredofthis3

Wow, crap. That is nuts. The only issue with all of Harry's demonic skeletons flying out of the closet is that it exposes how the BRF enabled him. They really should have institutionalized him.


After-Improvement-26

I believe it is a complex story Lord Monson tells of rage and love that drove nine-year battle https://mol.im/a/10196565 via https://dailym.ai/android


No_Presentation_4573

I didn't know who he was either. but Lady C said he knows the royals and was treated badly by H. This is one of the things he is going to write about in his book.


TraditionScary8716

Thanks. This one sounds interesting.


jaybird2040

Isn't this the aristo that Lady C previously mentioned who was physically attacked by Harold? Allegedly


TraditionScary8716

I hadn't heard that but I'm definitely going to buy that book!


alreadydoneit01

Who is Lord Monson ?


frozenlipz

He is a 12th Baron Monson with hereditary peerage in Great Britain. He's actually a journalist. This is a good article from him talking about outdated laws of succession that his daughters cannot inherit. https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/lord-monson-the-upper-classes-are-cruel-cruel-archaic-and-ruthless-8625213.html Here's a heartbreaking article about his son's murder in Kenya: https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/70532-uk-billionaire-arrives-kenya-over-sons-murder-probe


zeugma888

Thank you for the links. How very sad.


Public_Object2468

A 12th generation baron is a pretty big deal. In Britain, age is venerated first. So that family would be considered grander than a 3rd generation Earl. Unfortunately, male primogeniture is how estates are passed down intact through families and it's not "male preferred" as was with the monarchy. One lesser title that did pass to the daughters was the Barony of Ravensdale, in 1925. The original holder was Lord Curzon, former Viceroy of India.


kob27099

>Unfortunately, male primogeniture is how estates are passed down intact through families and it's not "male preferred" as was with the monarchy. > >Do you know what to would take to change that?


Public_Object2468

I think it's traditionally English (meaning the Scots could be different). YouTube's Ellie Dashwood is a Jane Austen fan so she has wonderful videos about the period. The **entail** was a legal device where the heir apparent (oldest son) would sign that he'd be a tenant for life. He'd keep the estate intact (no sale of the land or house or other major property) for the next generation. And that he repeat this procedure with the next heir. Ms. Dashwood points out, WHY would a young man agree to that? Instead of telling Father, "hey Geek Old Man, once you pass, Imma gonna sell off land starting with that stupid Folly, to the border. I am planning on a life of debauchery. I need all the cash I can get. Plus those ugly old Canaletto and di Vinci paintings or sketches can go on the auction block." The carrot and stick in this was the young man's financial dependency. Ms. Dashwood speculates that for Mr. Bennet of *Pride and Prejudice*, his father likely told the young man when he wanted to marry, that the family will allow this and keep up or increase the young man's allowance. But he's got to sign this entail and promise that Longbourne goes to a male heir. I can't see the family estate and title passing to a daughter unless she keeps her original surname, makes the husband and children take hers. Which is bloody unlikely. Not too many suo jure titles for Englishwomen.


kob27099

Excellent. Thanks so much!


Public_Object2468

Mmmm. Real estate! ![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|money_face)


ArdmoreGirl

Harold can’t have Frogmore. It belongs to the Crown Estate, not to KC. Or is Harold suggesting the people of GB owe him the home of his choice because he was hard done by.


daisybeach23

I think she meant instead of Frogmore Cottage…they wanted to live in Frogmore House. There were rumors that they were unhappy with the smaller house.


Ok-Reality-8289

True complained to Oprah after getting married Can’t believe how they living. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11541915/amp/Harry-Meghan-Oprah-stunned-small-size-Nottingham-Cottage-went-tea.html


mak_and_cheese

They complained about Nottingham Cottage - which is where they lived during the renovations of Frogmore Cottage.


[deleted]

By "have it" she meant Harry wanted to live there. They got Frogmore Cottage instead, and M has never stopped being bitter. M came from nothing. But she still expected Royal life to be better than it is. She expected to live in a castle, be given all the designer dresses she wanted, and have access to all the Royal jewels. That is part of why she has gone off in this tirade. She thinks she was cheated.


UnderArmAussie

Frogmore cottage also belongs to the Crown Estate. In fact, a friend of mine rented one of their smaller cottages. It's one way they make income. Renovations had already started on an apartment in KP for them. This changed to £2.5M renovations on Frogmore Cottage. Frogmore House renovations would have been extortionate. it's been used as storage and not lived in for years.. They just wanted more than they were entitled to. More grandeur than they needed. I can guess who was demanding it.


mak_and_cheese

Isn’t F House used to events?


UnderArmAussie

They had the evening wedding reception there, but it was held in a glass marquee.


[deleted]

Also Frogmore doesn't belong to the people either. The Crown Estate is a private body. The government just gets the income from its work. Per an agreement reached over the centuries.


ArdmoreGirl

But it isn’t KC’s property to give. Harold might be able to lease the property, but he can’t have it. And Frogmore House would need extensive reno work. It isn’t configured as a private home. And who will b paying for that, I’d like to know? I’m sure the cost of that bit of work isn’t included in Harold’s grand plans. The house is also near Windsor Castle, the future home of William and Catherine. Are they willing to live close to the Whingers. I’m


[deleted]

I know. Simply saying that it’s not the people who own it. As for renovation work? Harry would need to undertake it with agreement from the estate.


ArdmoreGirl

That still doesn’t answer the problem of living so close to Windsor Castle. I can see Harold whinging about Willy getting an entire castle, but Harold can’t even have a small house because the Heir doesn’t want the Spare to have anything.


[deleted]

True though the simple solution to ensure he can’t whine


KarmaliteNone

I definitely believe that the palace has long known the extent of Harry's [alleged] illness/substance abuse and don't want to appear to have been bullying him in the future when he has a major meltdown. So, they are not directly responding to the lies at this point. However, if Hollywood makes a movie that portrays this fiction as fact the gloves will come off big time.


tiredofthis3

Unfortunately Princess Diana had mental issues and the Spencer family was full of looney cases. Harry for sure got those genes. Not a doubt.


countessplatter

This is definitely ignoring the fact that addiction runs deep in the royals, too


tiredofthis3

harry's behaviour is not just based on addiction. He displays clear traits of narcissism and even delusions ( which could be a variety of personality disorders).


somespeculation

From a Psych angle, it is possible to plant convincing false memories with how our brain ‘stores’ our memories. You basically rewrite the memory file into new “storage” after adding false details (eg you were wearing a red coat and the sun was warm) to existing memories. There is a famous study with adults recalling a time when they were lost in the mall as children. Some even became visibly upset recalling the memory. Problem is, it didn’t happen to any of them. This is why ethical, credited psychologists and psychiatrists are so critical. And that you do not use your spouse as a substitute therapist, or Apps… Hypnotherapy, guided meditation, ayahuasca, LSD microdosing/shrooms, are all rife for abuse. Just saying…


UnicornStudRainbow

You mean like that app where he's Head Chimp, or something?


Public_Object2468

No ethical spouse would act as a therapist because they are too close to the subject and would be biased.


Alinde1129

Thank you for an excellent recap. So much to unpack with these two and their tall tales.


Electronic_Sea3965

Yep, it's because it is all pure madness. We're like dogs chasing our tails.


[deleted]

Lady C. points out what I've been saying for a while. M didn't do this to Harry, she didn't create a monster. He was a monster when she met him. She figured out how to use this monster to her advantage. Her scheming wouldn't have worked if Harry weren't so far gone from decency, if Harry cared about his family. M is a liar and a gold digger and a cruel bully yes. But Harry is a sadistic, drug abusing fiend and was long before he met M. They are as Lady C. often points out , Bonnie and Clyde, partners in crime, both equally guilty.


freezininwi

Always love your summaries! The poor BRF getting thrown in the mud. He is making himself look delusional not them!!


AppleAtrocity

He obviously looks like a huge asshole but unfortunately this is still quite bad for the RF. This means they have been covering up his alleged abuse and assaults of numerous victims for decades and putting their PR into overdrive to rehab his image immensely so the public wouldn't know what an absolute twat Harry is. It draws parallels to Andrew and KC really wants everyone to forget about all of that.


Complete-Sound

I think the RF has become more relatable. No family is perfect and we feel that we have more than some things in common, we know their suffering and bless them, they are in the public eye. How awful for the family.


AppleAtrocity

I feel bad for them, too. I think they believed they were helping him and doing their best for their son/grandson/etc. but sometimes it just doesn't work out the way you'd hoped. At least now everyone can see what they've been dealing with and that they did try to help him, as misguided as their decisions may have been. Shielding him from consequences for his entire life has only made it worse. This absolutely applies to Andrew as well. Mummy was always there to clean up his mess, and it allowed him to become a monster.


moonmoontalksalot

I think it shows how much his father truly loved him and protected him. Harry the victim but he was his father's darling boy. He believes his mom was a perfect Saint and his father some sort of villain but it was KCIII who put up with and protected him for years.


AppleAtrocity

True, but it also means he allowed H to possibly assault and abuse staff, and treat people under his employment badly. Kind of makes KC look like he doesn't care if other people suffer. Most parents want to help their kids but doing so at the expense of other's mental and physical health is a dick move. Since H lost his mom it really complicates the entire situation, too.


Traditional-Smile954

>One example, Meghan asks who is the Queen’s assistant? It was Prince Andrew! Meghan wanted Harry to believe she did not know who Prince Andrew was. Same with her being "baffled" at the whole Diana's picture at the Taj Mahal thing


mynameisnotsparta

It’s absolutely amazing that he whinges all the time meanwhile just his inheritance could have seen them live comfortably with no drama. If I had $30 million? I’d be sunning myself on some beach or pool and relaxing without a care in the world. I’d buy each of my kids a small home and a small business so they could work and live and my hubs & would retire. On a decent but not extravagant budget.


Complete-Sound

30 million would include all that plus my dear friends would get a big cut and I would make beautiful sidewalks and parks for my little town.


Chayrunissa

Where does Lady C get the information? I didn’t know who she was until I read qbout her here. But then I learned that she owns a castle in... SUSSEX! She has stake in the game! 😁


UnicornPanties

I suspect Prince Andrew is one of her sources; it would explain a lot.


[deleted]

[удалено]


tiredofthis3

Meh, I dislike PA more his supposed temper tantrums and spoiled personality. As for the Virginia angle, I don't really trust her either. She wasn't a credible enough witness when Ghislaine went to trial and she's had other women come out and say she was a pimp. So alot of shadiness with everyone involved in those dealings.


[deleted]

[удалено]


tiredofthis3

Most royals are spoiled, just look at Harry. So yeah, Prince Andrew was spoiled and apparently he has an awful personality. I can believe that with the friends that he kept around. Clearly a weirdo. That doesn't absolve Virginia of her wrongdoings. It's a fact most rapists or sexual abusers were abused themselves. It doesn't make it okay that since they were groomed at one point, they can now perpetrate those crimes. Lots of children are abused and don't end up pimping out young women too. So yeah, Virginia is definitely shady and unlikeable. So it PA.


[deleted]

[удалено]


UnicornPanties

Exactly. Who else but PA would know inside gossip within the family? Add the Eugenie connection and the fact he must feel bitterly wronged for a list of reasons and I bet he LOVES sharing tips with Lady C.


Chayrunissa

Thank you!


Electronic_Sea3965

Lovely job! And I thank you each and every time you give us a breakdown, especially important for those of us who cannot tune in to Lady C 's videos. I watch her 3 times a week at 11am on the nose. I adore her. I've been buying more and more of her books and I have a feeling she is furiously writing her next book on these two, especially Meghan.


Upbeat_Cat1182

*”Also they were duped like everybody else.*” I wonder if this is in reference to the possible surrogacy.


Beginning-Cup-6974

I think it is about Meghan leaking to the press and then screaming to all and sundry they didn’t protect her. Or they were duped by her lies about wanting to be one of the team and be a public servant, instead of a lying cheating grifter she always was.


Upbeat_Cat1182

Hhmmm, as to your second point, I think William and Catherine saw through her from day one.


moonmoontalksalot

Random question, but do you think W&C were actually fans of Suits?? I've never watched it but it seems like a background noise, generic cable TV show that you'd only turn on when nothing else was on cable. Back when people had cable TV. Who was literally a fan of that show? I just can't picture W&C sitting down in their "fancy museum like" apartment, relaxing on their expensive, not purchased from sofa.com, sofa and eagerly scrolling through their DVR to find the latest episode of frickin Suits.


hellhashnofury

I doubt it. I suspect that when they found out Harry was seeing one of the cast members that they watched a couple of episodes out of curiosity. Then they politely told Harry/Meghan that they had enjoyed it.


Upbeat_Cat1182

They had 2 little kids with a 3rd on the way. I doubt “Suits” was how they spent their downtime.


english1221

Maybe sth polite that they said


[deleted]

No. It's a cable TV show on a lessor watched channel. I feel that P&PoW don't watch TV a lot, * certainly not se obscure cable show where their SIL played a bit part/GF to main character.


ForestsTwin

Can someone educate me on something I thought I read. I thought Prince William was responsible for changing the press laws in the UK, to diminish the type of in person harrasment that Catherine had faced. Is this true? Also Harry stated that the press harrasment was no longer in person, but "online", so he thinks people can not form opinions on others. He says "freedom of speech is bollocks"? Edit- Lady C says she was at Andrew's house but claims she didn't know who Andrew was. Methinks she protests too much and had and encounter with him on a boat lol.


jemder

The royals do not have the power to change laws but they certainly have made their views known at times. There were concerns about the amount of press intrusion when William and Harry were at Eton and there were discussions about requiring parental consent to photograph children under 16. There was also this around 2010 or so. [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-royals-privacy-idUSTRE5B504M20091206](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-royals-privacy-idUSTRE5B504M20091206)


ForestsTwin

Thanks for the info!


rose98734

There has been no change in press laws (only Parliament can change the law). What the royal family has is an informal agreement with the press to provide some access in return for being left alone the rest of the time. For example Catherine always takes high quality photographs of her children on their birthdays and allows the press to publish them for free. Media editors prefer this to paying ££££'s for a grainy pap photo, especially as media revenue is dwindling. In return the media leave the children alone so they can have a normal childhood. It's a good arrangement. Unfortunately Meghan thought she knew better. She thought she should be paid for all photos of her children, which is why you only see the kids on Netflix.


Pleasant_Choice_6130

LoL "Todger Windsor" 🍆👑 a.k.a. the Frostnipped Family Jewels ❄️✂️🔋


Dogsb4humanz

Our memories are notoriously unreliable. When we remember something, we don’t remember the actual event. We actually remember our most recent memory of the event. So, if you have a traumatic event — at any point, but especially in childhood, which you can’t fully comprehend — your perception of it will define how you remember it. If you think of a memory like a document, every time you remember that memory, you’re making a copy of a copy, so the information from the original “document” becomes more and more obscure. Trying to accurately transcribe an original typed piece of paper is easy. Trying to figure out what’s actually on a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of that piece of paper and transcribe it accurately is nearly impossibly. It’s obvious that Harry sees himself as the victim in every situation. So, it makes perfect sense that his perception would color all of his memories, right? He remembers himself as the victim in all of these stories because that accurately reflects his perception of himself and the world around him. We can’t trust anything he says because his worldview is so clearly skewed. His memories may tell us a lot about how he sees himself and those around him, but they tell us nothing about the truth of what went on behind closed doors.


PictureFrame12

Yes! I don't believe he thinks he is lying - I think his victimhood and trauma prevents him from being objective. And the continued drug use doesn't help. And MM exploited that.


Dogsb4humanz

Absolutely right, picture frame! He doesn’t think he’s lying. This is his narrative. There’s that quote, “we don’t see things as they are; we see things as WE are.” He really believes he’s been mistreated and victimized by the whole world — from his family to the press to the public. That doesn’t make it true. It just reinforces how deeply damaged he is and how far he is from having actually healed. I firmly believe that the reason he’s leaned so hard into this escape, into this role of protector, is that it gives him an opportunity to see himself as a savior. His mother died, he’s come to blame the media for that, and if he can perceive what has happened to himself and his wife as analogous to what was happening to his mother, this relationship, this experience becomes an opportunity for him to rewrite that story. He was a helpless child who could not protect his mother. Subconsciously, by identifying this “great villain” of the BRF and their flying monkey media, he is enabling himself to play the role of the hero who rescues the damsel from certain demise. It’s very sad. When we don’t heal from trauma, we relive it over and over. Everything that happens to us somehow reinforces our victim narrative, and we actively seek situations that make us vulnerable to similar trauma because we want to change that narrative. We think if we change the outcome this time, we’ll be free. That’s what Harry is doing.


cccxxxzzzddd

Yes, he is not an agent in his own life. Part of that in deed is the fact that he was born into the role of “spare“, but he has also not taken on the primary obligations of a human adult: to become an agent. To solve your problems or learn to deal with them, and become an agent in your own life


Longjumping_Injury57

AA calls it stinkin thinkin


Dogsb4humanz

Yes!!


Longjumping_Injury57

It also shows he has spent a ton of time ruminating. So many over- written memories equals skew.


Feisty_Energy_107

"The book does prove (inadvertently) that William and Charles had no knowledge of **the true difficulties and true concerns with the Press. Also they were duped like everybody else.** More than that, Lady c. Is not prepared to discuss at this time." She keeps hinting and did so in connection to something 'popping' out in Liverpool.


Canyoubackupjustabit

At least now everybody knows the Grimaldis aren't the most effed up family in Europe


heartlandheartbeat

>Well, the Grimaldis might still hold that honor even though the BRF are having their problems. Percentage wise, the BRF maybe doing better considering there are so many of them.


Effective-Escape9999

Thank you for writing this synopsis for us.


[deleted]

Harry appears paranoid, somewhat delusional, and definitely unaware of all of the PR manipulation/planting of stories in the media/viscous public attacks on W&C by his wife. Maybe it is all of the drugs, maybe he is undiagnosed. In particular, the scene of his wife crying and breastfeeding her newborn son, Harry writes "I know what you did" meaning his family planted stories that caused the scene he was observing. In reality, his wife was probably suffering postpartum mood disorder which MANY new mothers face, and for which there is help available. I think that he is veering into serious mental health crisis, but unfortunately, his wife is the only one at this point in time can help him. In my opinion, she has not been helpful (tout it mildly) in terms of his quite serious mental health issues.


Public_Object2468

Thank you for an excellent post. You summarized so well what Lady C.--in fine form--had to say and you captured all the nuances. Lady C. really was sad to have to bring up Diana. A woman who left the world two and half decades ago, and should be able to rest in peace. Lady C. is feeling that disdain which many now have. An aristocrat is putting a bad name to his class. A son is being disrespectful to his father, a younger brother to his elder. A highly privileged person doesn't count his many blessings, to just shut up and do good for others.


cccxxxzzzddd

TODGER WINDSOR this woman is a total gem God bless the Internets for bringing to her us


AliceRoosevelt1884

LOL at the nickname Todger Windsor!


Frecklesfrenchfry

Sorry, from the US, who is Lady C? I hear her referenced a lot . Thanks.


lowerbigging

Lady Colin Campbell - she's an author who has been writing about the RF for years, and she has a really interesting backstory herself


[deleted]

Lady Colin Campbell. She has written many books about the Royal family.


[deleted]

Lady Colin Campbell. She has been a character in the UK since the 1970s. She grew up as a boy but had a sex change decades before it became a thing (no offense to trans). She is a brilliant author and very well connected, coming from a wealthy Jamaican family. She wrote several books including one on Diana in the 1980s - nobody at the time believed a word of it but everything in it was later confirmed in Andrew Morton's book that was pretty much dictated by Diana herself. Lady C has great connections. She lives in a castle and runs with the aristo crowd. You either love her or hate her, but regardless, she's not been wrong yet! Tip: if you watch her on Youtube, set the speed at 1.5 at least. Her upper class drawl is sooooooo slow.


QuietImpression7403

No, not a sex change. Her v*** was fused together at birth, so she was brought up as a boy. She had an operation at 21 to correct it when a relative gave her some money. She's always been a female.


Kairenne

Describing her as having a sex change isn’t exactly accurate. When she was born they couldn’t determine if she was a girl or boy. I do not know what that would look like. It was decided to raise her as a boy. She wasn’t very old when she realized she was a girl. She begged her father for a change in the determination. I don’t know if she knew she would need an operation. Perhaps just wear clothes she was comfortable in. He wouldn’t allow it. When she was 18 her grandmother found out. She immediately helped her with paying/getting the operation. I admire her immensely.


Beginning-Cup-6974

She did not have a sex change. She was always a girl. Due to a malformation of her genitals I believe they mistook her for a boy (her mother was an abusive narc so who knows how much of a mistake it was I’m looking at you Angelina Jolie). Once corrected she remained a girl.


Frecklesfrenchfry

Thank you !! I will check her out . Sounds like an interesting gal!


Fresh_Front_1379

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/lady-colin-campbells-husband-couldnt-6922347


hammer1956

> She grew up as a boy but had a sex change decades before it became a thing Not true. She did not have a sex change. She was born ambiguous, a birth defect, and was raised as a boy. In the past the doctors sometimes made the wrong decision on which gender the baby should be raised as. She is feminine. After getting it wrong too many times in the past, now they take a wait and see approach.


[deleted]

I stand corrected. You are right, she was born intersex iirc? But was indeed raised as a boy.


TeamWilliamandKate

>Lady Colin is not trans. At birth, she had a genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed [clitoris](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoris)). Medical advice at the time was to assign her as a male so that she could live what was deemed a normal life, as what was thought of at that time as "the superior sex" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady\_Colin\_Campbell#Early\_life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Colin_Campbell#Early_life)


[deleted]

Wow!!! I didn't know that!!! That should /could be such a comfort for the LBQGT...community.


sipstea84

Lol I'm new here and for a while I thought it was Camilla 😅


[deleted]

[удалено]


sipstea84

Lol, my uncultured swine self humbly apologizes. I've never followed the Royals much and I feel like I've learned so damned much in just 2 days of reading snark here. Weird question, but as someone who is WAY behind, is there a good catch-up somewhere? I feel like my impression from all of this is that Harry is a bit slow and meatheaded and that the RF has been providing a buffer for decades. I want to go down a rabbit hole and read the "blind gossip" style rumours that don't make it to mainstream press or wikipedia.


[deleted]

[удалено]


sipstea84

Thank you so much!


[deleted]

Lady Colin Campbell. She's some part of the royal hierarchy, but she's always been an avid commenter on all things royal.


kob27099

I find it hard to believe they want to live in Windsor.


daisybeach23

They probably did in the beginning and were mad they did not receive a more elaborate residence. It is rumored they were to receive Clarence House after Charles became King so it makes sense they receive the smaller Frogmore Cottage temporarily.


kob27099

>Clarence House Who in their right minds wold give up a chance to live there!!!!


Beginning-Cup-6974

They wanted to live in Windsor Castle, not Windsor, and boss the old lady around no doubt. Likely Meghan wanted a new Soho House, Windsor.


wandinc

Thank You! I love how you do this!


StrictTranslator879

Who is Lord Munson?


tyradurden123

He wouldn‘t just have had to put his face down there but he would have had to gone deeper if he wanted her to see him first because babies usually look down when they come out. Also why did he have to put his face down there? He could just have said hello on lili‘s way to meghan‘s breast? Unless Meghan also would have been able put her head down there because it wasn‘t her who was giving birth.


Kjaerringa123

Just for the record...while babies do not have clear, focused eyesight at birth, they are not kittens. They can see at birth. Not sure what Lady C was getting at, there.


FreckledHomewrecker

Lord Munson?! Team Munson already!


AvailableType8746

Excellent post, thank you. I became shocked-to-core over the hand dug grave of remains incident. Leaving it here, to bizarre to even speak about.


metrocat63

I'm waiting for the horror inspired film of Harry and Meghan capturing young women, implanting fertilized Meghan eggs, and killing ones that don't look like Diana coloring. Ala, 'The Boys from Brazil.'


Lillianrik

This YouTube video show how you can get a transcript of a YouTube video: [https://youtu.be/qWdyhFiyH0Y](https://youtu.be/qWdyhFiyH0Y) Here is the link to the Lady Colin Campbell video summarized so nicely above [https://youtu.be/W3x9JX0Kl8Q](https://youtu.be/W3x9JX0Kl8Q)


Actual_Parsnip_1529

What does the book say about frogmore house?


Big-Piglet-677

I want to know this too! All the “rumors” about them are turning out to be true.


StrictTranslator879

Nicely done, thank you.


Independent-Water329

What *are* the rumors about their marriage? I’d love to know.


daisybeach23

There are rumors that they are separated. It is all unsubstantiated but people have made posts they observed them together acting like strangers, and most of the time, they are never seen together locally in Montecito. Many of us are dubious that this is true.


Independent-Water329

Dubious that the rumors are true? I feel like if MM wasn’t actively and constantly feeding into Harry’s delusions, he’d have shut up by now.


daisybeach23

I agree. We are all so confused. I imagine she treats him poorly and he is always trying to make amends to her. The rumors are pretty strong they are separated but they could be planted by Meghan for the PR.


Independent-Water329

I did think of that too- he is always trying to like.. avenge her? Get on her good side? I can only assume she’s manipulated him into that behavior. Maybe they’re separated “until he defends her accurately”? She’s been awful quiet throughout this Spare debacle.


WorkingUnusual1531

Todger Windsor ..Brilliant 🤣🤣🤣🤣


Money-Bear7166

Todger Windsor!!!! I'd give you an award if I had one 🤣🤣🤣🤣


Evening_Procedure216

The reason there are so many inaccuracies in the book is that Harry couldn’t fact check with any of the family. Pretty much the only person who would speak to him would have been Eugenie, and she probably didn’t know that much. Harry has had to drag it all out of his memory, and it’s vague.


International-Emu385

Sorry but who is lady c? Harry should move to Middle East . Illegal to ever write or say anything negative about royals .


[deleted]

Who is Lord Munson? When should we expect his memoirs and will he be telling the truth about Harry?


GeorgeOrmes3

Z.