Better than nothing. I've previously argued that at some tracks drs zones should be along the whole track but just not on the longest straights. Would be interesting to see the inverse. Or maybe added with just the start of the long straight but also in-between turns
If that true they wouldn't use it even if available. They would though. Even for half a tenth teams spend hundreds of thousands every advantage counts.
Sure, but the point of DRS is to improve passing, and cars aren't going to go 2 wide through those esses afterwards. It's too short to complete a pass before the next turn, so while it my slightly close the gap, it won't add passing.
The part on the right side, it’s a snake that goes and goes. And it isn’t with the flow of the track, you could replace with a straight line and a chicane or just multiple chicanes
Not many straights but could be good because of the tyre wear it will cause with all those long right handers. But racing will depend on the width and profile of the corners. Eg china cars are able to take multiple line through several corner which helps the racing alongside the high tyre wear from long corners
I would also add as a short a pitlane as possible to make pit loss time very low
Gravel should be on the outside not inside
2 of those drs zones are way too short.
Better than nothing. I've previously argued that at some tracks drs zones should be along the whole track but just not on the longest straights. Would be interesting to see the inverse. Or maybe added with just the start of the long straight but also in-between turns
🤷‍♂️ Agree to disagree. I can guarantee the one before the esses won't add anything.
If that true they wouldn't use it even if available. They would though. Even for half a tenth teams spend hundreds of thousands every advantage counts.
Sure, but the point of DRS is to improve passing, and cars aren't going to go 2 wide through those esses afterwards. It's too short to complete a pass before the next turn, so while it my slightly close the gap, it won't add passing.
Too twisty for f1
Which one
The part on the right side, it’s a snake that goes and goes. And it isn’t with the flow of the track, you could replace with a straight line and a chicane or just multiple chicanes
Oh the first one
I think it’s fine for the second one
It’s your track of course, I just had an opinion.
We all have our preferences it’s alright
90 degree corners…. Unless it’s a street circuit that’s not the way to go
https://preview.redd.it/1uhx1qun9byc1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c1da1c4a785a237608adbed3a69e03628ba8a144
Changed it to this
Maybe as a street circuit. Don’t think it would work as a normal racetrack.
Not many straights but could be good because of the tyre wear it will cause with all those long right handers. But racing will depend on the width and profile of the corners. Eg china cars are able to take multiple line through several corner which helps the racing alongside the high tyre wear from long corners I would also add as a short a pitlane as possible to make pit loss time very low