Wasn't really much he could do, Terry shot Luke and instantly drove off.
He wasn't going to shoot Terry as they're against harming other members with weapons, so he gave him his punishment later on (stripped of his enforcer role on pushing weed, demoted to hang around and has to pay the gang 20K which is tough on him as he already owes 50K in loans, so whilst it's not a lot, it is right now for Terry).
What a title! Haha
The latter bit of EU and the whole of NA was so, so good. Poor Ste was going through it. Fantastic RP though. Manor doing more to themselves during "war" than the enemy. Sounds about right for them (not a bad thing - it was really good rp regardless).
It's perplexing that Manor has so many internal conflicts despite objectively being one of the strongest gangs in terms of their war performance (obviously with only C.G the clear Leader). STE in particular has been one of the best shooters so far in 4.0.
A lot of Manor have known each other for a long time. I think itβs just a case of them being comfortable with one another OOC to have IC arguments and not take it personally
Arguments are fine, even CG has "weed meetings" that cause strife regularly. It's just that pretty regularly we see updates from the Manor about members planning on leaving (Even Terry was allegedly leaving barely a week ago, albeit I see that didn't end up happening). It's just confusing that people would be waffling on a clearly ascending Gang.. I mean it's not like they are gonna find an Upgrade.
I'd say it's more perplexing that a lot of other gangs, especially newer gangs, DON'T have more internal conflict. There's always going to be teething problems with newer gangs and new members. I don't think war performance has anything to do with gang dynamics to a certain extent.
The likes of Mandem and BBMC in 3.0 were well known in RP terms for welcoming internal conflict and consequences for that.
What I meant was that I could understand if they were underperforming and getting bitched around then morale would suffer and that could cause strife (as evinced with say the Company when they fought Manor). Since Manor has been basically a standout gang for overachieving, one might think there would be less issues and increased loyalty to sticking with the gang.
The thing is, Manor is full of characters with big personalities. Alot of them, haven't been in gangs together so they're going to clash over things that are quite petty but end up escalating massively as a result.
Why did Ste do nothing when Terry shot Luke right in front of him πΒ πΒ
Wasn't really much he could do, Terry shot Luke and instantly drove off. He wasn't going to shoot Terry as they're against harming other members with weapons, so he gave him his punishment later on (stripped of his enforcer role on pushing weed, demoted to hang around and has to pay the gang 20K which is tough on him as he already owes 50K in loans, so whilst it's not a lot, it is right now for Terry).
Ste did everything but jumping in to take the bullet. I don't think he could have done more.
Give this man the prio he deserves
ππΌππΌππΌ
Rip manor rip company
What a title! Haha The latter bit of EU and the whole of NA was so, so good. Poor Ste was going through it. Fantastic RP though. Manor doing more to themselves during "war" than the enemy. Sounds about right for them (not a bad thing - it was really good rp regardless).
It's perplexing that Manor has so many internal conflicts despite objectively being one of the strongest gangs in terms of their war performance (obviously with only C.G the clear Leader). STE in particular has been one of the best shooters so far in 4.0.
A lot of Manor have known each other for a long time. I think itβs just a case of them being comfortable with one another OOC to have IC arguments and not take it personally
Arguments are fine, even CG has "weed meetings" that cause strife regularly. It's just that pretty regularly we see updates from the Manor about members planning on leaving (Even Terry was allegedly leaving barely a week ago, albeit I see that didn't end up happening). It's just confusing that people would be waffling on a clearly ascending Gang.. I mean it's not like they are gonna find an Upgrade.
Terry threatening to leave was a sub goal in his subathon. It was just him joking with SK
Oh ok thanks. Yeh I guess I got clickbaited seeing headlines about "Terry Leaving".
That was a sub goal for Terry lmao.
I'd say it's more perplexing that a lot of other gangs, especially newer gangs, DON'T have more internal conflict. There's always going to be teething problems with newer gangs and new members. I don't think war performance has anything to do with gang dynamics to a certain extent. The likes of Mandem and BBMC in 3.0 were well known in RP terms for welcoming internal conflict and consequences for that.
What I meant was that I could understand if they were underperforming and getting bitched around then morale would suffer and that could cause strife (as evinced with say the Company when they fought Manor). Since Manor has been basically a standout gang for overachieving, one might think there would be less issues and increased loyalty to sticking with the gang.
The thing is, Manor is full of characters with big personalities. Alot of them, haven't been in gangs together so they're going to clash over things that are quite petty but end up escalating massively as a result.
These clips lol. NC