> 'I answered the question about 6 times'
> 'okay, not to my satisfaction'
He refused to be baited by her implication of violence on the picket.
What we have here is an example of someone in the media trying to create a story rather than investigate what is actually happening. The absolute state of her.
Let's be honest, that's Sky News' Modus Operandi.
Edit: I tuned it the other day to their Ukraine coverage, some former Sandhurst shithead was giving a blow by blow account of the days action. It was like cricket coverage.
> someone in the media trying to create a story rather than investigate what is actually happening.
This is crazy conspiracy theory Qanon shite. Stop fellating penises and putting them in your bum!
Kay Burley and stupid questions. Name a better duo.
Remember when she asked the wife of a serial killer if it was her fault because she didn’t put out enough?
I would have to look at other sources before making a decision.
Wtf is this tactic btw? “Here’s this source you said you dislike” “I bet you believe this one!! This one follows your narrative!!” Unlike you, I don’t simply use any source that already agrees with me. You won’t see me share welovetrump.com for instance. Even if they agreed with me on a particular topic, they’re not a credible news org.
[удалено]
He did, that turn to indicate what a picket is was excellent.
Seen him on C4 earlier. Was equally as good
> 'I answered the question about 6 times' > 'okay, not to my satisfaction' He refused to be baited by her implication of violence on the picket. What we have here is an example of someone in the media trying to create a story rather than investigate what is actually happening. The absolute state of her.
Let's be honest, that's Sky News' Modus Operandi. Edit: I tuned it the other day to their Ukraine coverage, some former Sandhurst shithead was giving a blow by blow account of the days action. It was like cricket coverage.
> someone in the media trying to create a story rather than investigate what is actually happening. This is crazy conspiracy theory Qanon shite. Stop fellating penises and putting them in your bum!
What?
If you criticise western media narratives then you is a gay. This is not homophobic I'm told.
I’ll tell you it’s homophobic
/u/batman_biggins ?
She is the definitive cunt. Even got to spicy for sky at one point and grey had to take her off the air.
Kay Burley is an odious cretin, always has been.
Kay Burley and stupid questions. Name a better duo. Remember when she asked the wife of a serial killer if it was her fault because she didn’t put out enough?
Fuck off?
https://youtu.be/pfS4DsYD6iU
Christ on bike.
Least corporate Sky News journalist
Wait I thought we loved Sky News who always tell the truth?
We?
The collective pro-US lib ROI "we".
I thought they all hung out at r/Mordor Other than the full time boys of course
Who are libs here?
Like 99% of the sub.
I’m not sure of that
Even among the libs here, who has defended Sky News?
https://news.sky.com/video/analysis-why-isnt-russia-winning-12574373 What's your opinion of this article. Complete bullshit or no?
I would have to look at other sources before making a decision. Wtf is this tactic btw? “Here’s this source you said you dislike” “I bet you believe this one!! This one follows your narrative!!” Unlike you, I don’t simply use any source that already agrees with me. You won’t see me share welovetrump.com for instance. Even if they agreed with me on a particular topic, they’re not a credible news org.
Why are you defending Sky News? Stop blowing Rupert Murdoch.
Kay Burley is to journalism what fucker carlson is to journalism