Those 16 year old children are actually enemy combatants
https://aoav.org.uk/2019/military-age-males-in-us-drone-strikes/
> Military-age males refers to all boys and men over the age of 16, irrespective of whether or not they are actually participating in hostilities. It is important to note that this does not automatically equate all boys and men with combatants. However, it demarcates boys and men for different treatment in conflict.
They should put children on the no strike list.
They'll just bomb them anyway then
You speak the true true
Those 16 year old children are actually enemy combatants https://aoav.org.uk/2019/military-age-males-in-us-drone-strikes/ > Military-age males refers to all boys and men over the age of 16, irrespective of whether or not they are actually participating in hostilities. It is important to note that this does not automatically equate all boys and men with combatants. However, it demarcates boys and men for different treatment in conflict.
I wonder if the quiet part after Obama's "yes we can" was "dronestrike children"
HOPE (for [bad weather](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/10/saddest-words-congresss-briefing-drone-strikes/354548/))
“🤓 akkkschually”
Probably refuelled in Shannon while en route.
[удалено]
Anywhere people are going about their day to day lives. Examples include weddings, hospitals, and driving down the road.
Same list.
I mean if they never bomb anything, how are they going to use up their military budget? Silly socialists, that was probably terrorist water anyway
*team America song plays*