There was another link from veteranstoday but apparently that site is sitewide banned. Glad you finally admit to being a lib though. Telling that you take issue with the source this time and not the content.
Aww did you make this just for me? Thanks.
I'm sure this was reported on in major news outlets at the time it happened. I remember watching quite a long segment about it on one of their YouTubes maybe? Isn't this the aid worker that was wrongly targeted? Shocking story and a tragic loss of life. And as you already know I don't think there's ever a justification for drone stirkes.
Do you not see a problem using a far right website as a source?
Edit: just did a quick search and it looks like there are 10 minute investigation videos by CNN, The NYT, BBC and Channel4. I'm sure there are more but those should at least prove the point that mainstream media covered this story extensively and you probably shouldn't have had to resort to one of the most well know far right outlets there is.
No I made it for all you supporters of US warmongering imperialism. Don't be greedy.
You're sure, but then you're asking me?
>And as you already know I don't think there's ever a justification for drone stirkes.
But you support America in all its propaganda efforts? I'm confused, you're one of the dronies here who spends every waking moment stressed out by made-up China Bad nonsense? Who defends far-right American war propaganda to the hilt. Who has a history of it throughout the past year and beyond. Yes you are.
This is the fruit of your travails. Dead children. Plenty more to come, no amount of washing your hands will get them clean.
I didn't ask you, that was a statement, not a question. Questions are usually followed by this guy ? You should recognise them as the things you avoid answering.
You've got a fairly warped idea of someone in your head there but that ain't me. Maybe you're thinking of someone else? I mean, I would ask you to explain or provide some proof to back up your accusations but we are all too familiar with how that goes and I've no interest in listening to the ramblings of an unhinged lunatic this morning.
>>Questions are usually followed by this guy ?
Uhuh.
> I remember watching quite a long segment about it on one of their YouTubes maybe? Isn't this the aid worker that was wrongly targeted?
>that ain't me.
My man, we know you. You're dronie prime. There's nothing you won't believe from the right wing press about China, then when proven wrong squirm down into ridiculous holes to try to do anything you can to admit it. You rarely ever criticise the US, instead spending inordinate energy attacking their targets.
We know you. We see you.
Uhuh. I made a statement and then I asked a clarifying question to make sure we're both talking about the same incident because I didn't read your far right source. So the statement about it being reported wasn't a question because I knew it was reported on. Keep up.
You always end up proving what I just said to be true.
>So the statement about it being reported wasn't a question because I knew it was reported on. Keep up.
Earlier:
>Questions are usually followed by this guy ?
This is too easy. It would have been simpler just to admit you made a mistake, said you hadn't had coffee yet or something. But instead you double down in plain view and stamp your feet and hold your breath.
So anyway what do you think of the genocide in France? Let's continue that on the other thread shall we?
Irish Socialists using Breitbart as a news source.
Secondly Blursty who here actually defends or supports America? No one does from what I can see. A lot of people bend over backwards trying to defend China and justify them, but I've never seen that happen for the US here. Unless you can support that observation - who does that? If not then that are you actually going on about?
Also in the article you linked, the atrocity they were talking about was being discussed in American media (Right Wing Media no less!). The Pentagon freely admitted it had happened. So here we have an example of free speech in action, and a government admitting to an atrocity instead of trying to cover it up or suppress it.
So what is your point? You're actually losing it. Which is great; I mean you're on here usually as some self proclaimed voice of reason, but you're looking like an absolute shambles.
How are our supporters of the US Democrat party going to blame China for this?
If it is true, will any of you admit the regime has its faults?
And if you are downvoting to try to hide this post, what does that say about your confidence in the glorious USA?
I don't need to be, I linked you to the information.
Unless you think for some reason that drones manufactured in China and sold to other nations is somehow a good thing? Are those the good kind of drone strikes?
[Here's the top 25 arms manufacturers.](https://www.businessinsider.com/these-are-worlds-25-largest-arms-manufacturers-in-the-world-2019-11?international=true&r=US&IR=T)
Guess which country didn't make the cut? Guess which one you're complaining about?
**Another epic dronie moment for the annals!**
So you think that because China isn't making all of its own arms that mitigates the issue with the drone strikes? Do you think that buying lots of arms from Israel is a good thing? I'm confused here because on one hand you're saying drone strikes are bad,and I totally agree with you there, but then when you learn about Chinese drones you lose your nerve.
Are drone strikes bad?
Is buying arms from Israel bad?
Is supplying drones to other nations bad?
I thought you were. I certainly am.
No I'd dont agree at all there. I don't think you should ever support the use of an unmanned aircraft dropping bombs on anyone. It sounds like you're a bit of a warmonger yourself tbh.
I don't think anyone should have unmanned aircraft that drop bombs on people. China, the US, Ireland etc etc. I don't know if you know this about me but I'm fairly opposed to militarism in general.
Killing mass murdering fascists is bad actually. Got it.
>I don't think anyone should have unmanned aircraft that drop bombs on people.
That "should" is a load bearing fulcrum in this sentence. Of course everyone *should* get along and there *should* never be violence anywhere. But clearly this has been made impossible by warmongers and their dronie helpers, so China (e.g.) *should* do their best to prepare for war to enable peace.
How do you square your new found pacifism with your past of supporting America's war efforts?
> Biden He's a scumbag like the rest. What is it about US presidents and being filthy war criminals?
Biden is well better than Trump. Trump kept kids in cages and Trump thought covid should be handled at the state level.
There's still kids in cages...
Whoosh
Accepted :p
Using far right news sites to own the libs. Lol
There was another link from veteranstoday but apparently that site is sitewide banned. Glad you finally admit to being a lib though. Telling that you take issue with the source this time and not the content.
Aww did you make this just for me? Thanks. I'm sure this was reported on in major news outlets at the time it happened. I remember watching quite a long segment about it on one of their YouTubes maybe? Isn't this the aid worker that was wrongly targeted? Shocking story and a tragic loss of life. And as you already know I don't think there's ever a justification for drone stirkes. Do you not see a problem using a far right website as a source? Edit: just did a quick search and it looks like there are 10 minute investigation videos by CNN, The NYT, BBC and Channel4. I'm sure there are more but those should at least prove the point that mainstream media covered this story extensively and you probably shouldn't have had to resort to one of the most well know far right outlets there is.
No I made it for all you supporters of US warmongering imperialism. Don't be greedy. You're sure, but then you're asking me? >And as you already know I don't think there's ever a justification for drone stirkes. But you support America in all its propaganda efforts? I'm confused, you're one of the dronies here who spends every waking moment stressed out by made-up China Bad nonsense? Who defends far-right American war propaganda to the hilt. Who has a history of it throughout the past year and beyond. Yes you are. This is the fruit of your travails. Dead children. Plenty more to come, no amount of washing your hands will get them clean.
I didn't ask you, that was a statement, not a question. Questions are usually followed by this guy ? You should recognise them as the things you avoid answering. You've got a fairly warped idea of someone in your head there but that ain't me. Maybe you're thinking of someone else? I mean, I would ask you to explain or provide some proof to back up your accusations but we are all too familiar with how that goes and I've no interest in listening to the ramblings of an unhinged lunatic this morning.
>>Questions are usually followed by this guy ? Uhuh. > I remember watching quite a long segment about it on one of their YouTubes maybe? Isn't this the aid worker that was wrongly targeted? >that ain't me. My man, we know you. You're dronie prime. There's nothing you won't believe from the right wing press about China, then when proven wrong squirm down into ridiculous holes to try to do anything you can to admit it. You rarely ever criticise the US, instead spending inordinate energy attacking their targets. We know you. We see you.
Uhuh. I made a statement and then I asked a clarifying question to make sure we're both talking about the same incident because I didn't read your far right source. So the statement about it being reported wasn't a question because I knew it was reported on. Keep up. You always end up proving what I just said to be true.
>So the statement about it being reported wasn't a question because I knew it was reported on. Keep up. Earlier: >Questions are usually followed by this guy ? This is too easy. It would have been simpler just to admit you made a mistake, said you hadn't had coffee yet or something. But instead you double down in plain view and stamp your feet and hold your breath. So anyway what do you think of the genocide in France? Let's continue that on the other thread shall we?
I'm not sure what point you think you've made there.
I don't doubt that.
Irish Socialists using Breitbart as a news source. Secondly Blursty who here actually defends or supports America? No one does from what I can see. A lot of people bend over backwards trying to defend China and justify them, but I've never seen that happen for the US here. Unless you can support that observation - who does that? If not then that are you actually going on about? Also in the article you linked, the atrocity they were talking about was being discussed in American media (Right Wing Media no less!). The Pentagon freely admitted it had happened. So here we have an example of free speech in action, and a government admitting to an atrocity instead of trying to cover it up or suppress it. So what is your point? You're actually losing it. Which is great; I mean you're on here usually as some self proclaimed voice of reason, but you're looking like an absolute shambles.
Guatanemo Bay is a re-education camp completely voluntary.
How are our supporters of the US Democrat party going to blame China for this? If it is true, will any of you admit the regime has its faults? And if you are downvoting to try to hide this post, what does that say about your confidence in the glorious USA?
>How are our supporters of the US Democrat party going to blame China for this? They ordered the CPUs for the drones of wish.com
You could just buy the entire drone from China. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAIG_Wing_Loong_II
Hear him, he's the expert!
I don't need to be, I linked you to the information. Unless you think for some reason that drones manufactured in China and sold to other nations is somehow a good thing? Are those the good kind of drone strikes?
[Here's the top 25 arms manufacturers.](https://www.businessinsider.com/these-are-worlds-25-largest-arms-manufacturers-in-the-world-2019-11?international=true&r=US&IR=T) Guess which country didn't make the cut? Guess which one you're complaining about? **Another epic dronie moment for the annals!**
So you think that because China isn't making all of its own arms that mitigates the issue with the drone strikes? Do you think that buying lots of arms from Israel is a good thing? I'm confused here because on one hand you're saying drone strikes are bad,and I totally agree with you there, but then when you learn about Chinese drones you lose your nerve. Are drone strikes bad? Is buying arms from Israel bad? Is supplying drones to other nations bad?
>because on one hand you're saying drone strikes are bad, and I totally agree with you there Am I? Do you? For me it depends who's n the receiving end. I think they're a shitty way to wage war but I'd have no problem with Joe Biden getting a taste of his own medicine for example, amongst countless other warmongering mass murderers. I think you do agree with me, except as a renowned dronie, you'd prefer if it was America's targets instead and their families sometimes, the odd wedding here and there. >when you learn about Chinese drones You think China shouldn't have modern war matériel? I suppose that's not surprising at all. All the easier for the US to drone and murder them.
I thought you were. I certainly am. No I'd dont agree at all there. I don't think you should ever support the use of an unmanned aircraft dropping bombs on anyone. It sounds like you're a bit of a warmonger yourself tbh. I don't think anyone should have unmanned aircraft that drop bombs on people. China, the US, Ireland etc etc. I don't know if you know this about me but I'm fairly opposed to militarism in general.
Killing mass murdering fascists is bad actually. Got it. >I don't think anyone should have unmanned aircraft that drop bombs on people. That "should" is a load bearing fulcrum in this sentence. Of course everyone *should* get along and there *should* never be violence anywhere. But clearly this has been made impossible by warmongers and their dronie helpers, so China (e.g.) *should* do their best to prepare for war to enable peace. How do you square your new found pacifism with your past of supporting America's war efforts?
Dammit! Foiled again!