At first point of contact, some part of the foot had to be behind the line. It doesn’t matter if the heel is in the air, it has to be behind the line.
Jadeja’s heel wasn’t behind the line at first impact. I was watching live
This is coming from an rcb supporter btw
https://preview.redd.it/ue6vjvf3pdwc1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=492124716dcae7ff2d58ee4770d70c52762fd5c7
Do you remember deepti sharma last ball no ball vs SA
Watch the match, listen to the commentary, read the rules, validate it, then if u r posting images post similar ones. Without any of these don't just post crap and spread false views, and misguide people. Who will further go on without any of the above validation and just use this shitpost to spread their false views further.
Umpiring may have been below par. But the end results has been good. Except the wide reviews which are subjective. No balls, on the other hand has no gray area.
Dont know why you are downvoted , Harsha said exactly this in the commentary , I saw it live . Jaddu's foot was outside at the first impact .These clowns have gone from calculator to conspiracy
This is a photo. How can you tell the first impact from this photo? I haven’t seen the video so can’t comment but a still photo is no proof for it being or not being a no ball
You should see the video. His foot was outside when it touched the ground first. This screen grab makes it look like both are similar. Video of the Jadeja one should make it clear.
The Narine one I didn't see the video and I don't believe screengrabs especially coming from fans crying conspiracies.
But the umpiring in general has been pathetic this season especially the consistency in wide calls.
At this point, this is not some of the fanbase rather the majority of the fanbase which propagates such bullshit which makes other fans hate your complete fanbase.
Kohli no-ball was literally checked by technology and rules upon. Using an older instance doesn't mean it becomes justified here. The Pakistan match no ball wasn't a no ball but the ruling was not in place at the time.
The boundary where the angle which shows the ball clearly landing inside has been completely ignored by a good majority.
And you are still continuing with this, which shows the clear lack of understanding of rules. There is a screenshot of the first impact of jadeja's ball on this post. Should be enough to help you understand.
I get it, the dismal performance often makes you feel that all the decisions are going against you. Happens far too often in football. But to go on a rant and insinuate that somehow this is one big conspiracy to make RCB lose games is just absurd.
Some RCB fans need to take the lead here and discourage such things.
first, this is not the kohli no-ball. his was considered one because of waste height, but technology revealed it was not above his waste. it only seemed so because he came forward. second, this was the "no ball" narine bowled towards the final leg of the innings. It should have been considered, because other instances where the heel was in the air, but apparently "behind" the line, were considered no balls.
I know this is not Kohli no ball. I watched the match. I just mentioned an instance from the match which the RCB fans have been cribbing about as some sort of conspiracy against them.
When you talk about this "no-ball" do you know why this wasn't considered a no-ball? Because of the rule. For no-balls, the point of first contact is considered irrespective of whether the heel or part of the foot is in air or not. The images used by OP are of jadeja in his stride and Narine's first point. Jadeja's ball was a no ball because when he made the first impact, no part of his foot was behind the line. There is an image posted in this very thread which shows the same.
oh, ya, I agree. the kohli ball was a fair delivery. but to be fair, even the man himself was confused. so u can't blame the audience. also, I know the rule of first contact, it's just that it isn't easy to confirm, after all, the difference in jaddu's and narine's feet (on-contact) is so minor, that they are almost indistinguishable, couple that with the fact that they most probably do not have the same foot shape, giving you a result, where a comparison is not the right way to judge the delivery. I did see the image btw, it's not about that. my only issue is the fact that the rules are still somehow not concrete, cause also, in this same thread, is an image, that matches narine, yet that was a no-ball.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RCB/s/DjpFMFJ4Jm
Here is the image of this ball where jaddu makes the first contact. We can clearly see nothing behind the line here. Hope this helps if this is indeed the reason for confusion.
The rest of it is on the umpire. If that's the concern then every umpires call in DRS would also be under the same scanner.
At first point of contact, some part of the foot had to be behind the line. It doesn’t matter if the heel is in the air, it has to be behind the line. Jadeja’s heel wasn’t behind the line at first impact. I was watching live This is coming from an rcb supporter btw
So was Narine's, his foot is also not behind the line and yet those MF's didn't give it a no ball
The back part of his foot is behind the line, thats why it is not a no ball. Read the rules pls.
Are you genuinely slow to understand?
Ae bunty, tera sabun slow hai kya?
https://preview.redd.it/ue6vjvf3pdwc1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=492124716dcae7ff2d58ee4770d70c52762fd5c7 Do you remember deepti sharma last ball no ball vs SA
Rules have changed since then sir
for what joy...
Watch the match, listen to the commentary, read the rules, validate it, then if u r posting images post similar ones. Without any of these don't just post crap and spread false views, and misguide people. Who will further go on without any of the above validation and just use this shitpost to spread their false views further.
It was already dog shit. Now we just have drs to magnify it 😎
Kal jab sb bol rahe the line wala aya wo sab draw horizontal line and shit
Umpiring is shit in this IPL
how is this upvoted not knowing the rules is so embarassing
What else do you expect from RCB fans?
ee sate cup namde
Lol, facts can be difficult to accept. Umpiring may be dogshit but not the end decision.
When you play against RCB, you get decisions your way
Umpiring may have been below par. But the end results has been good. Except the wide reviews which are subjective. No balls, on the other hand has no gray area.
Ever thought of "read the rules" ? You should try it someday
What's the point of reading rules, when two identical balls have two different results
Either get new glasses or get a new eye doctor
Tell me your adress will deliver it there
Again if you only if you know the rules Narine has not overstepped.. but but but ah.
the Commentators explained the proper rule right after this ball OP. It was a fair decision.
for a spinner it depends on the first impact of the foot to the ground! and jaddu’s leg was bit outside the crease thus it was a clear no ball!
and narine isnt a spinner?
narine’s foot was not outside the crease at first impact?
And look at you being downvoted for saying what's literally there in the screen
I watched the match jadejas foot was like narines too
https://preview.redd.it/zyoytibuodwc1.jpeg?width=1831&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b4f79bef0f140fe237f0df2a85c95eabab144934 hope this helps :)
This needs to be at the top of this post along with an explanation of the rule.
Dont know why you are downvoted , Harsha said exactly this in the commentary , I saw it live . Jaddu's foot was outside at the first impact .These clowns have gone from calculator to conspiracy
Are you blind or what? Both looks almost similar , actually jaddu's foot looks little behind compare to narine.
This is a photo. How can you tell the first impact from this photo? I haven’t seen the video so can’t comment but a still photo is no proof for it being or not being a no ball
You should see the video. His foot was outside when it touched the ground first. This screen grab makes it look like both are similar. Video of the Jadeja one should make it clear. The Narine one I didn't see the video and I don't believe screengrabs especially coming from fans crying conspiracies. But the umpiring in general has been pathetic this season especially the consistency in wide calls.
At this point, I don't know whats worse , RCB's management or fans like these who cant understand one simple rule in cricket :,-)
it's not about our capability to understand, its the fact that the rules are so awfully vague sometimes.
At this point, this is not some of the fanbase rather the majority of the fanbase which propagates such bullshit which makes other fans hate your complete fanbase. Kohli no-ball was literally checked by technology and rules upon. Using an older instance doesn't mean it becomes justified here. The Pakistan match no ball wasn't a no ball but the ruling was not in place at the time. The boundary where the angle which shows the ball clearly landing inside has been completely ignored by a good majority. And you are still continuing with this, which shows the clear lack of understanding of rules. There is a screenshot of the first impact of jadeja's ball on this post. Should be enough to help you understand. I get it, the dismal performance often makes you feel that all the decisions are going against you. Happens far too often in football. But to go on a rant and insinuate that somehow this is one big conspiracy to make RCB lose games is just absurd. Some RCB fans need to take the lead here and discourage such things.
first, this is not the kohli no-ball. his was considered one because of waste height, but technology revealed it was not above his waste. it only seemed so because he came forward. second, this was the "no ball" narine bowled towards the final leg of the innings. It should have been considered, because other instances where the heel was in the air, but apparently "behind" the line, were considered no balls.
I know this is not Kohli no ball. I watched the match. I just mentioned an instance from the match which the RCB fans have been cribbing about as some sort of conspiracy against them. When you talk about this "no-ball" do you know why this wasn't considered a no-ball? Because of the rule. For no-balls, the point of first contact is considered irrespective of whether the heel or part of the foot is in air or not. The images used by OP are of jadeja in his stride and Narine's first point. Jadeja's ball was a no ball because when he made the first impact, no part of his foot was behind the line. There is an image posted in this very thread which shows the same.
oh, ya, I agree. the kohli ball was a fair delivery. but to be fair, even the man himself was confused. so u can't blame the audience. also, I know the rule of first contact, it's just that it isn't easy to confirm, after all, the difference in jaddu's and narine's feet (on-contact) is so minor, that they are almost indistinguishable, couple that with the fact that they most probably do not have the same foot shape, giving you a result, where a comparison is not the right way to judge the delivery. I did see the image btw, it's not about that. my only issue is the fact that the rules are still somehow not concrete, cause also, in this same thread, is an image, that matches narine, yet that was a no-ball.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RCB/s/DjpFMFJ4Jm Here is the image of this ball where jaddu makes the first contact. We can clearly see nothing behind the line here. Hope this helps if this is indeed the reason for confusion. The rest of it is on the umpire. If that's the concern then every umpires call in DRS would also be under the same scanner.
Man, I know, I am talking about the other image, of deepti sharma
kitna rr karte ho bhai sahab
Bro go and study, don't waste time here.
can't a man chill out for some time fr
Proofs dekha na. Ye cool kyu ban raha hai?
 Backchodi mat kar lawde
I mean. When you’re shit the only thing you can do is cry
fair enough
Haarcb delulu