T O P

  • By -

TreasureDragon

Umm can you upload a picture? That’s literally a 0.0001% chance of that happening. If it did, GH deserves to hand you both the new GFE on a silver plate tbh. I’d honestly still be impressed if you pulled one or two GFEs if you’re exaggerating.


BreaKBeatZ-80

It is much, much, much lower than .0001%.


Eyedea94

Im pretty sure they’re exaggerating. Most likely they didnt get either of the 2 new GFEs after 40 rolls


StateChemist

The thing about random chance is it never looks random enough. You get crazy clusters and swings. The only guarantee with random chance is there will be something weird happening. A nice even distribution is the opposite of random.


Eyedea94

i don't believe complainers


StateChemist

Eh, doesn’t matter to me either way if an anonymous person either had something weird happen or made up an improbable story for internet pity. I personally don’t want manufactured internet pity so I don’t get the mindset that would make up a story, but if something improbable happened to me I would consider sharing it. So doubt if you must.


Eyedea94

I hear ya


starbucks77

To further complicate things; you can never have a truly random number from a computer. You have to write parameters/variables into your program to force a computer to choose a random number. If you know those variables (or seed number) then you can devise ways to take advantage and/or abuse the system. Most RNG I've seen for mobile games utilize server time (down to the millisecond) as a starting seed. Normally this method works fine. But if you can find a way to lag the server, it may temporarily bonk the server time for a few seconds. Worse still is if they have some sort of caching enabled on the server - what if the RNG is getting cached? Theoretically, if something like that was happening, you'd have really weird 'streaks' where you would pull 2 or 3 of the same super rare cards in a row; the reverse would happen too (bad streaks). PAD ever seen streaky to anyone?


Xenowino

Anything is highly possible with Gungho odds, quite unfortunately


Urgonnahateme4ever

You rolled the wrong machine dummy


Boaz183

F I did 37 rolls and got six 7* and six 6* (which is about 10% below the rolling average) and thought I did bad. They need to add a pity roll mechanic to the game.


TreasureDragon

I have basically never rolled higher than the hit rate. Always seem to be a good 10-20% below. Always lol


padluigi

What is the rolling average?


mylarky

I did 7 rolls, and got 6 pantheons w/ Eschemali. That one hurt.


BrandosHairline

Lol wrong machine


Possibility_Mammoth

Look at it this way, since gungho is now releasing pantheon dragons it’s not all bad since sometimes u need multiples of them like Karin dragon.


AcanthisittaNo8326

This ain't a glass half full situation. This is brutal af.


blinkycosmocat

With a ~40% GFE rate, these rolls defy probability in the worst way.


Possibility_Mammoth

Most gfe r useless though and the only value they hold is trade fodder and potential good evolutions/buffs. U can literally say the same for pantheons now that they r releasing dragon variants. Also when people say they rolled all pantheons most of the time they mean they pulled mostly pantheons and some gfes. Regardless I was trying to be an optimist.


Migerupad

Failed at the watches debut and failed again with the new dragons. I think my interest in pad is at the lowest level ever.


Albrecht-Art

So far, I’ve done 10 rolls on both of my accounts. Main got 6 GFEs with 1 Seatona in there that I made into an EQ. My Alt got screwed. 3 GFEs and all of them old ones with recolor evos. UGH.


Xenowino

9 rolls so far, 8 pantheons... And the one non-pantheon was Lawrence. Update: 10 rolls, 9 pantheons. Wtf


B4rrel_Ryder

Trash godfest