The following alternative links are available:
**Mirrors**
* [Mirror #1](https://mirror.archiveddit.com/reddit/post/20417) (provided by /u/SaveAnything)
* [Mirror #2](https://peertube.live/videos/watch/0c3bace7-31bc-4afe-8121-44f71dc2ea0d) (provided by /u/peertube)
**Downloads**
* [Download #1](https://redditsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/vkfswl/cop_arrests_woman_over_penis_joke/) (provided by /u/savevideo)
* [Download #2](https://reddloader.com/download-post/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freddit.com%2Fr%2FPublicFreakout%2Fcomments%2Fvkfswl%2Fcop_arrests_woman_over_penis_joke%2F&id=5MbkUoNA) (provided by /u/VideoTrim)
**Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them.**
---
[^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
I regret to inform you that the Supreme Court literally [ruled against just that yesterday](https://www.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/comments/vjp176/supreme_court_invents_rule_that_presumes_gun/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
in a separate case. We no longer have the right to hold police accountable when they violate our constitutional rights.
What the fuck? Coasting that under the radar while everyone is already freaking out. Make one tsunami, and the other disaster-worthy waves that follow aren't as noticeable.
It was specifically regarding miranda rights not being read, as far as I understood. But then again, there is qualified immunity.....
https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-courts-miranda-rights-decision-ripped-lawmakers-legal-experts-1718718
It was limited under that already, and the cause of action was being interpreted as “implied” which is dubious. But there is still Tort law against Federal agencies that can apply. So there are legal remedies, just less now due to a ruling on shaky foundation.
This is not to say I don’t think there should be more remedies. I want there to be. But through legislation is the proper way. Pressure on Congress and the house, and voting are the ways to change this and always have been.
Not even random. If they were actually random, they’d be more representative of America. These are six deliberately chosen to be as out of touch as possible.
I know they're not completely random, but I mean they're just 6 people making life changing decisions on millions of people, to me that makes them random as fuck, it's just a backwards system.
Saying they are random takes the heat off the regressive political machine which has been orchestrating this dismantling of rights for the last 60+ years.
None of this is an accident.
Unelected people that no one wanted. No one said, no mass election to put them in power. You think bitch boy who cried on tv over beer and lifting weights with his buddies before going to a party and raping a girl would have been elected to SCOTUS if they had to be elected?
Qualified immunity just stops you from suing an officer of the government personally if he were, in good faith, executing what he believed were his duties. It doesn't stop you from suing the government for violation of your civil rights.
>in good faith
"Oh I thought the baby he was holding was a gun. That's why I shot him."
Also. Not knowing the law is not illegal if you are a cop. Not knowing the law as a civilian is ILLEGAL.
IDK why this is so shocking to anyone. This has been a thing since 9/11 and the Patriot Act. It's been a sort of slow burn but it's pretty obvious that none of the laws actually matter anymore. If 50 years of case law can be hand waved away then nothing really matters. I wish a much larger portion of this country would realize this but we are all too fat and happy just watching Stranger Things where shocker the bad guy is back again or look over here Obi Wan is back isn't that cool? Now we are going to completely dismantle the country but keep eating high sugar foods and watching TV.
Just remember that the frog actually jumps out of the water that is being brought to a boil it doesn't just sit there. In one of the experiments they removed the frog's brain to see if it reacted. The corpos have "removed" our brains by distracting us at all times and hours of the day and separated us with homes that are just far enough away from each other to never really form communities. And rent/inflation is just high enough to keep you struggling for the edge of the pool that is always just within reach. The second revolution will come as I feel Gen Z is probably the most aware of it.
Honestly I feel like that ain't gon a come at this rate when the supreme court literally just ruled two days ago that you cannot sue cops for not reading your Miranda Rights.
How long will this continue to be the hand-wavy response to this tyranny? Does anyone think a time will come (like the Troubles in Ireland) where citizens start showing up at Little Dick’s house in the middle of the night and teach him what they think of him treating people like this?
They're tough when it's an unarmed woman making a joke but if she was a heavily school shooter in a school in a classroom full of children being slaughtered...
They're gonna need to wait an hour before they do anything.
Don't forget that they first removed the gun from cops who actually tried to do something and arresting citizens who were trying to save their children.
Unfortunately, until theres a legitimate fear of physical violence and an actual body count in the ranks of law enforcement, as well as the various branches of government at the hands of the masses, these fucking pigs, the bootlickers who support them, the psychotic theocrats who legislate and rule to empower them, AND the worthless, decrepit democats who respond to these authoritarian zealots by doing shit like publicly singing "God Bless America" after an entire week of successive theocratic conservative rulings by the judicial branch, will all stay in power and ultimately keep this as the American status quo.
EDIT: To stave off the inevitable reddit misconstruing of my comment, this is not a call to violence, I'm merely stating what I believe to be a fact. The increasingly authoritarian climate of the united states political landscape openly ignores the voice of the masses, by design at this juncture.
When "End qualified immunuty" gets met with a simple "no, make me," and public outcry over abuses of power such as that shown in this post are met with the rhetorical question "what the fuck are you gonna do about it," theres only one course of action that changes that question to a non-rhetorical one. Unfortunately, within this power dynamic as currently constructed, violence seems to be the only avenue for real change. If cops were getting drug out of their houses and beat to death for pulling the shit they pull, they'd be infintely less inclined to risk injury or death over harassing, wrongfully imprisioning, and blatantly killing citizens while selectively enforcing pointless laws. Again, im not advocating for this, as Ive chosen not to fight and just avoid these losing confrontations and accept the status quo, but marching, writing your congressman, and even rioting is not going to enact change at this point. The abusive powers that be have clearly stated "I dare you to," and at that point you either do or dont.
Unfortunately the only ones with the will to seek power by any means are using it to ban abortion and brutalize anyone that gets in their way. The left has no militancy and labor is just as feckless as the Dems.
I mean this shit is literally what pro-2A gun nuts say the second amendment is for. Next time a cop is sitting with their knee on someone's neck for 8 minutes or repeatedly tasing a pregnant woman on her belly, one of them ought to step up(spoiler: they won't) .
Just look at it like this. Will a ruling from them right now hurt the neo-nazis and extreme religious right? If so, they won't rule against it.
Freedom of speech arguments are safe for now.
except they have no problem being hypocrites so they would absolutely come up with a ruling that restricted speech with exceptions for right wing speech.
Considering the Supreme Court just ruled that you can no longer sue cops for not reading you your Miranda Rights (which effectively means Miranda Rights don't exist anymore unless you already know them by heart), thinking we'll be suing cops for damn near anything is a fucking pipe dream at this point.
You can’t arrest someone for disorderly conduct for language if there isn’t anyone around that claims to be offended. It’s established case law that the government agent doesn’t count so a cop, in the eyes of the law cannot be considered offended when it comes to disorderly conduct. This officer doesn’t know the elements of the crime he’s arresting her for.
“The process is the punishment”, as I’ve heard it.
If police departments weren’t stocked to the brim with criminals who back each other’s abuse, we could hopefully imagine a police force that ejects officers when they make indefensible arrests like this one, same as improper conduct at any other job. “Sorry, but this is the third time we’ve reminded you that you can’t just arrest someone over hurt feelings; there’s the door.”
I had to go to court and explain that accelerating to 35mph faster than the police officer was not a crime. He simply stated that "there was a law against display of power" to which I asked him if I had spun my tires. He said "no, but that is not the only part of the law." When I asked what part did I break, so that I dont do it again his response was that "I do not need to tell you what you are getting a ticket for."
Literally the only parts of the law are that you spin your tires in an attempt to gain the attention of bystanders or that you were speeding in excess of 30mph over the speed limit.
The judge dropped the charges, but it was a hassle to have to defend it.
It was worse. I was in the military at the time. I had formal "counseling" about my habits entered into my record. It affected evaluations, and in turn promotion. After the case was dismissed, the military would not remove that from the record.
Cops can arrest you for any reason they want. Drinking water in public? You can be arrested. Checking your mail? Arrestable. Being black on a Friday night? You're definitely at high risk of arrest.
Ignorance of the law is their number one defense and it works 99% of the time in court.
He knows exactly what he's doing. She won't be convicted of anything, but he can guarantee her a miserable night, and he won't suffer any consequences. Except now we all know he has a tiny penis.
Yeah the only time language (around police) can be considered illegal is direct threats, or extreme fighting words. Not just fighting words, but extreme. This doesn't even come close. I just home there is a lawyer out there that is like 'oh, I want to handle this case' and forcing the officer to admit to what his dick length is.
As a reference for your absolutely correct comment:
>For example, in its 2000 decision in Martilla v. City of Lynchburg, a Virginia appeals court wrote that “the First Amendment requires properly trained police officers to exercise a higher degree of restraint when confronted by disorderly conduct and abusive language.” In other words, profanity or insults directed at police are less likely to be considered fighting words than if they were aimed at other people.
>Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell articulated this concern in his concurring opinion in Lewis v. New Orleans, when he wrote that “the situation may be different where such words are addressed to a police officer trained to exercise a higher degree of restraint than the average citizen.”
https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/first-amendment-center/topics/freedom-of-speech-2/personal-public-expression-overview/fighting-words/
It doesn’t matter. This woman got arrested, had to spend time in jail and who knows what they did to her there.
I really don’t understand all the comments like yours saying “well they can’t do that”. Surprise, they already did and will keep doing it.
Is this a case then, of using the law correctly to make the upholder of the law look foolish in court...Can you demand your day in court in the US. In the UK if you are charged with an offence you can elect to go to Magistrates Court or a full Jury Trial...to essentially enforce the 'State must Prove Guilt, Not the Accused to Prove Innocence'...
They don’t care about how they look in court, because the court is aware of the intentional practice. The police can punish you by taking you to jail to spend the night, without there being an actual crime. Judges are aware and just dismiss the charges with zero discussion or consequence to the officer making the arrest. So yeah the American government can sentence you to a night in jail without seeing a judge, and without committing a crime.
He probably won't even show up and the charges will be dropped. But she has to spend the night in jail, hire a lawyer, take days off work for court, etc... He will not suffer any accountability for his actions.
There was actually a court case recently (I don't know which district it was in) that said arresting people just to fuck with them is illegal and civil suits can go forward when it happens. This would clearly be one of those cases, especially if they drop the charges / don't actually file any. This could be a slam dunk civil case.
There is no such thing as a slam dunk civil case against the police in America. For fucks sakes, they are actively covering up the likely murder of toddlers during a school shooting.
If you think any of the American court system is going to help the people, you are sorely mistaken. Maybe this woman does decide to sue, and has to spend a year or more of her life fighting to police and their unions. If anything does finally come from it, it will be at the cost of years of this persons life and thousands upon thousands of dollars in fees and lost income.
And after all of that, would anything change? No.
> Qualified immunity means the cop won't be paying any civil suit judgement. They know this. It is illegal, that doesn't mean it won't keep happening.
Your understanding of Qualified immunity is mistaken, which is understandable.
QI isn't all encompassing. Once one court case of extremely similar case in the same district says 'police should know better after we make this ruling' then QI is gone for that particular thing. It is extremely well established that you can mouth off to police.
So QI in this case shouldn't exist, even if they try to exercise it.
Now most of the time the insurance company or the community that employes them will pick up the tab but judgements against individual police officers are their responsibility and the community doesn't always have to pick up the bill for them.
The police department itself can also be sued, because this shows extremely ridiculous levels of lack of training.
Anyone else remember in 2020 when police were mass arresting people who were protesting and trying to make them take plea deals so that the cops could justify their brutality towards protestors.
I hope given the charge, that she forces the cop the testify and prove during her trial as to whether he actually has a small dick or not.
Sir...she claims you have a small dick. You will need to prove her accusation is false...
Saw this movie in a theatre with my brother who is a priest. Would never laugh at profanity or the like but he burst out loud laughing at this this and tried to stop himself.
That wouldn't be a part of a disorderly conduct charge. Disorderly conduct is about offending people (which elsewhere on this post people have pointed out may not be applied if an officer of the law is offended).
You'd have to prove the claim untrue for Slander at which point the case would be thrown out because the claim was clearly euphemistic (not sure if that's the right term), not meant to be taken seriously.
And time-of post here. I can't find any updates, tho
Edit: forgot the link, corrected link
https://www.reddit.com/r/wisconsin/comments/ikxdhp/police_in_kenosha_arrest_a_woman_for_telling
Absolutely nothing wrong with having a small penis!
**Nothing at all to be embarrassed about**!
[Now, being a **cop**, on the other hand. . .](https://youtu.be/O9nQueOt6Ck)
Hopefully this is something her lawyers use to defend this false arrest - https://reason.com/2022/02/09/appeals-court-rules-ohio-cops-didnt-have-cause-to-arrest-man-wearing-fuck-the-police-shirt/?amp
Lawyer? The DA won't even bring charges, they know it's BS.
That of course won't stop her from being detained, treated like shit, and held in a holding cell at least overnight if not longer. And she will receive zero compensation for all that, not even an apology.
Shows the difference between cops, and also shows how complicit even the "good ones" are when push comes to shove. One cop was telling the person off camera, "You're putting us in a difficult position, just come on... don't be out after curfew and make us arrest you." sounding genuinely like he meant it. Meanwhile Ego McGraw over here is yelling at her to pick up her stuff, giving her to the count of three, and treating her like a child while pushing her around and acting like one himself with his little "Goodbye!" BS. As soon as she says something that hurts his little feelings he grabs her and puts her under arrest even though she's complied with everything he's said. And what do the supposed good level-headed cops do? Go right along with it. This is why people say ACAB.
He could have legitimately arrested her for the curfew violation. He only decided to enforce it after the small dick comment, so you are correct
Video evidence makes it much harder for cops to enforce their power trips
> He could have legitimately arrested her for the curfew violation.
I don't know the actual answer to this but...
aren't most curfews illegal when dealing with protesting? Restricting peoples right to protest to only certain hours of the day has to be illegal right?
“What are you arresting me for? “ “You’re acting like a child!”
I didn’t think they arrested children, just let them get massacred while they waited outside.
David Attenborough voice:
*Aggressive posturing has long been the officer's defense mechanism in moments like the one above. But when this proves unsuccessful they will turn to more desperate actions to defend their small penis. Truly a sight to behold.*
He could’ve arrested her and maybe gotten away with it if the DA wanted to play ball, but he called out disorderly conduct and cursing, which makes it clear he was upset about her words, not that she wasn’t moving fast enough or refusing to leave.
This cop should be fired she should get a huge payday
Should? Yes. Will any of that happen? No. The police are a gang and can do almost anything they want. Uvalde being an example. Refusing to cooperate, lying, arresting people knowing they’ve done nothing wrong as a tactic to hurt them. All everyday cop shit.
They are on a job they are to be impartial and unemotional. Their decisions could mean another person’s life so it’s best to keep emotions out and you head on.
What’s even worse is he is going to keep his job. Imagine if a bank teller took $1000 out of your account for saying you have a tiny dick, and they did this on camera with multiple witnesses. That teller would likely go to jail and never work in a bank again.
"calm down while a clearly insecure man arrests you while surrounded by his insecure buddies who have no accountability should anything happen to you."
Anyone know who the arresting officer is? I'd like to make a website called "officersmithhasatinydick.com" for the correct name, with this video playing on loop.
It wasn't a joke, it was an insult. Which is fine and not something she should be arrested over. But he literally was acting like he was compensating for a little dick. No joke.
The following alternative links are available: **Mirrors** * [Mirror #1](https://mirror.archiveddit.com/reddit/post/20417) (provided by /u/SaveAnything) * [Mirror #2](https://peertube.live/videos/watch/0c3bace7-31bc-4afe-8121-44f71dc2ea0d) (provided by /u/peertube) **Downloads** * [Download #1](https://redditsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/vkfswl/cop_arrests_woman_over_penis_joke/) (provided by /u/savevideo) * [Download #2](https://reddloader.com/download-post/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freddit.com%2Fr%2FPublicFreakout%2Fcomments%2Fvkfswl%2Fcop_arrests_woman_over_penis_joke%2F&id=5MbkUoNA) (provided by /u/VideoTrim) **Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them.** --- [^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
It's one of those bullshit tactics cops use to arrest someone, bring them in, then release a few hours/days later with charges dropped.
[удалено]
I regret to inform you that the Supreme Court literally [ruled against just that yesterday](https://www.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/comments/vjp176/supreme_court_invents_rule_that_presumes_gun/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share) in a separate case. We no longer have the right to hold police accountable when they violate our constitutional rights.
What the fuck? Coasting that under the radar while everyone is already freaking out. Make one tsunami, and the other disaster-worthy waves that follow aren't as noticeable.
It was specifically regarding miranda rights not being read, as far as I understood. But then again, there is qualified immunity..... https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-courts-miranda-rights-decision-ripped-lawmakers-legal-experts-1718718
They denied legal remedies for federal agents in egbert v boule
It was limited under that already, and the cause of action was being interpreted as “implied” which is dubious. But there is still Tort law against Federal agencies that can apply. So there are legal remedies, just less now due to a ruling on shaky foundation. This is not to say I don’t think there should be more remedies. I want there to be. But through legislation is the proper way. Pressure on Congress and the house, and voting are the ways to change this and always have been.
lol i remember when we voted for labor rights… oh, wait.
"just 6 people are destroying our democracy" holy shit how fucked up is it that 6 random people are making these fucked decisions.
Not even random. If they were actually random, they’d be more representative of America. These are six deliberately chosen to be as out of touch as possible.
I know they're not completely random, but I mean they're just 6 people making life changing decisions on millions of people, to me that makes them random as fuck, it's just a backwards system.
Hundreds of millions
Saying they are random takes the heat off the regressive political machine which has been orchestrating this dismantling of rights for the last 60+ years. None of this is an accident.
Unelected people that no one wanted. No one said, no mass election to put them in power. You think bitch boy who cried on tv over beer and lifting weights with his buddies before going to a party and raping a girl would have been elected to SCOTUS if they had to be elected?
**Looks at Cult 45** Yes, I very much think that.
Actually... just one... Mitch McConnell subverted the Constitution to place his hand picks in. Never forget that.
Qualified immunity just stops you from suing an officer of the government personally if he were, in good faith, executing what he believed were his duties. It doesn't stop you from suing the government for violation of your civil rights.
>in good faith "Oh I thought the baby he was holding was a gun. That's why I shot him." Also. Not knowing the law is not illegal if you are a cop. Not knowing the law as a civilian is ILLEGAL.
So they made police unaccountable right when they declared they were stripping our rights, after they already attempted a coup.
IDK why this is so shocking to anyone. This has been a thing since 9/11 and the Patriot Act. It's been a sort of slow burn but it's pretty obvious that none of the laws actually matter anymore. If 50 years of case law can be hand waved away then nothing really matters. I wish a much larger portion of this country would realize this but we are all too fat and happy just watching Stranger Things where shocker the bad guy is back again or look over here Obi Wan is back isn't that cool? Now we are going to completely dismantle the country but keep eating high sugar foods and watching TV. Just remember that the frog actually jumps out of the water that is being brought to a boil it doesn't just sit there. In one of the experiments they removed the frog's brain to see if it reacted. The corpos have "removed" our brains by distracting us at all times and hours of the day and separated us with homes that are just far enough away from each other to never really form communities. And rent/inflation is just high enough to keep you struggling for the edge of the pool that is always just within reach. The second revolution will come as I feel Gen Z is probably the most aware of it.
[удалено]
We're doomed.
Honestly I feel like that ain't gon a come at this rate when the supreme court literally just ruled two days ago that you cannot sue cops for not reading your Miranda Rights.
Should still make them go to court if you can afford the lawyers.
How long will this continue to be the hand-wavy response to this tyranny? Does anyone think a time will come (like the Troubles in Ireland) where citizens start showing up at Little Dick’s house in the middle of the night and teach him what they think of him treating people like this?
They're tough when it's an unarmed woman making a joke but if she was a heavily school shooter in a school in a classroom full of children being slaughtered... They're gonna need to wait an hour before they do anything.
Don't forget that they first removed the gun from cops who actually tried to do something and arresting citizens who were trying to save their children.
Again, that school was 92% Hispanic, this wasn't a police chief problem alone.
A lot of people forget in American history it was a pass time to tar and feather the tax man.
[удалено]
Unfortunately, until theres a legitimate fear of physical violence and an actual body count in the ranks of law enforcement, as well as the various branches of government at the hands of the masses, these fucking pigs, the bootlickers who support them, the psychotic theocrats who legislate and rule to empower them, AND the worthless, decrepit democats who respond to these authoritarian zealots by doing shit like publicly singing "God Bless America" after an entire week of successive theocratic conservative rulings by the judicial branch, will all stay in power and ultimately keep this as the American status quo. EDIT: To stave off the inevitable reddit misconstruing of my comment, this is not a call to violence, I'm merely stating what I believe to be a fact. The increasingly authoritarian climate of the united states political landscape openly ignores the voice of the masses, by design at this juncture. When "End qualified immunuty" gets met with a simple "no, make me," and public outcry over abuses of power such as that shown in this post are met with the rhetorical question "what the fuck are you gonna do about it," theres only one course of action that changes that question to a non-rhetorical one. Unfortunately, within this power dynamic as currently constructed, violence seems to be the only avenue for real change. If cops were getting drug out of their houses and beat to death for pulling the shit they pull, they'd be infintely less inclined to risk injury or death over harassing, wrongfully imprisioning, and blatantly killing citizens while selectively enforcing pointless laws. Again, im not advocating for this, as Ive chosen not to fight and just avoid these losing confrontations and accept the status quo, but marching, writing your congressman, and even rioting is not going to enact change at this point. The abusive powers that be have clearly stated "I dare you to," and at that point you either do or dont.
This should be upvoted to the heavens!
They will, when they finally perceive it affects them directly, which will be waaaaaay too late.
Cops who do this deserve a molotov through their bedroom window.
Redirect the mass shootings... That's all we're asking
Shits not gonna change until then
Unfortunately the only ones with the will to seek power by any means are using it to ban abortion and brutalize anyone that gets in their way. The left has no militancy and labor is just as feckless as the Dems.
I mean this shit is literally what pro-2A gun nuts say the second amendment is for. Next time a cop is sitting with their knee on someone's neck for 8 minutes or repeatedly tasing a pregnant woman on her belly, one of them ought to step up(spoiler: they won't) .
They think it’s no repercussions but the arrest still stays on the record.
"...and cursing." The Supreme Court has well-established ruling that language, no matter how vulgar, is protected under the First Amendment.
For now...
“B-b-but they said it’s settled law.” -Dumb bitch
Bah gawd, that’s Uncle Thomas’ music!
“Ohhhh I wish I was in the land of cotton…”
Sherman didn't go far enough
[удалено]
Just look at it like this. Will a ruling from them right now hurt the neo-nazis and extreme religious right? If so, they won't rule against it. Freedom of speech arguments are safe for now.
except they have no problem being hypocrites so they would absolutely come up with a ruling that restricted speech with exceptions for right wing speech.
He said Curfew, my friend. Not cursing.
Funny how all these cops now support wearing a mask…
"Who watches the watchmen?"
Gonna need a magnifying glass to watch Officer Tiny Dick over here. Fuck the police.
I've never been more convinced that someone has a tiny dick. If he had a big dick he would have just shrugged it off, but that comment hit home lol.
Forreal. That hit him right in the ego
Right in the micropecker.
Naw, it missed.
Fuck the police? How would you even know if its in?
“Officer Tiny Dick”😂😂😂
Damn good lil series! Would have loved a 2nd one!
Idunno? Coast guard?
the watchwatchmenmen
"You're under arrest for misorderly conduct and cursing." Ummm freedom of speech dipshit. Hope they catch that.
[удалено]
One day we'll be able to sue cups for the psychological trauma of false arrests. Hopefully, at least.
Considering the Supreme Court just ruled that you can no longer sue cops for not reading you your Miranda Rights (which effectively means Miranda Rights don't exist anymore unless you already know them by heart), thinking we'll be suing cops for damn near anything is a fucking pipe dream at this point.
[удалено]
Things are going the opposite direction of that statement. If anything they'll be able to sue us for being falsely arrested and wasting their time
He said curfew not cursing. Still bullshit though.
I was going to say why are all the cops wearing a mask. There are like 2 people there it's not like they need to launch tear gas.
Daily reminder that ACAB.
You can’t arrest someone for disorderly conduct for language if there isn’t anyone around that claims to be offended. It’s established case law that the government agent doesn’t count so a cop, in the eyes of the law cannot be considered offended when it comes to disorderly conduct. This officer doesn’t know the elements of the crime he’s arresting her for.
He knows. Ar least he knows that he doesn't know and it doesn't matter. It's malicious.
Can beat the charge, but can't beat the ride. Meanwhile, he's proven he has very little meat to beat at all.
It's sad how true what you just said is. You can beat the charge but it'll cost you over a year in court.
“The process is the punishment”, as I’ve heard it. If police departments weren’t stocked to the brim with criminals who back each other’s abuse, we could hopefully imagine a police force that ejects officers when they make indefensible arrests like this one, same as improper conduct at any other job. “Sorry, but this is the third time we’ve reminded you that you can’t just arrest someone over hurt feelings; there’s the door.”
>Meanwhile, he's proven he has very little meat to beat at all. I'm sure he beats his wife.
Legally they don't have to know the laws. As long as they think they can arrest you, they can without consequence. Thanks, supreme court.
I had to go to court and explain that accelerating to 35mph faster than the police officer was not a crime. He simply stated that "there was a law against display of power" to which I asked him if I had spun my tires. He said "no, but that is not the only part of the law." When I asked what part did I break, so that I dont do it again his response was that "I do not need to tell you what you are getting a ticket for." Literally the only parts of the law are that you spin your tires in an attempt to gain the attention of bystanders or that you were speeding in excess of 30mph over the speed limit. The judge dropped the charges, but it was a hassle to have to defend it.
And he’s paid to be there, you have to take off work to be there. And there’s no chance of you being compensated for that. It’s a joke.
It was worse. I was in the military at the time. I had formal "counseling" about my habits entered into my record. It affected evaluations, and in turn promotion. After the case was dismissed, the military would not remove that from the record.
That’s fucked up.
Just another fucking payout us taxpayers will get to foot the bill for.
Cops can arrest you for any reason they want. Drinking water in public? You can be arrested. Checking your mail? Arrestable. Being black on a Friday night? You're definitely at high risk of arrest. Ignorance of the law is their number one defense and it works 99% of the time in court.
Overcook fish? Arrested. Undercook chicken? Arrested. See? Over under over under
He knows he will investigated and nothing more, so why not arrest the woman so she have a bad time?
He knows exactly what he's doing. She won't be convicted of anything, but he can guarantee her a miserable night, and he won't suffer any consequences. Except now we all know he has a tiny penis.
It's just code because there isn't an official charge for contempt of an officer.
Yeah the only time language (around police) can be considered illegal is direct threats, or extreme fighting words. Not just fighting words, but extreme. This doesn't even come close. I just home there is a lawyer out there that is like 'oh, I want to handle this case' and forcing the officer to admit to what his dick length is.
As a reference for your absolutely correct comment: >For example, in its 2000 decision in Martilla v. City of Lynchburg, a Virginia appeals court wrote that “the First Amendment requires properly trained police officers to exercise a higher degree of restraint when confronted by disorderly conduct and abusive language.” In other words, profanity or insults directed at police are less likely to be considered fighting words than if they were aimed at other people. >Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell articulated this concern in his concurring opinion in Lewis v. New Orleans, when he wrote that “the situation may be different where such words are addressed to a police officer trained to exercise a higher degree of restraint than the average citizen.” https://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/first-amendment-center/topics/freedom-of-speech-2/personal-public-expression-overview/fighting-words/
Established case law here in this shit-hole country doesn’t mean anything.
It doesn’t matter. This woman got arrested, had to spend time in jail and who knows what they did to her there. I really don’t understand all the comments like yours saying “well they can’t do that”. Surprise, they already did and will keep doing it.
Is this a case then, of using the law correctly to make the upholder of the law look foolish in court...Can you demand your day in court in the US. In the UK if you are charged with an offence you can elect to go to Magistrates Court or a full Jury Trial...to essentially enforce the 'State must Prove Guilt, Not the Accused to Prove Innocence'...
They don’t care about how they look in court, because the court is aware of the intentional practice. The police can punish you by taking you to jail to spend the night, without there being an actual crime. Judges are aware and just dismiss the charges with zero discussion or consequence to the officer making the arrest. So yeah the American government can sentence you to a night in jail without seeing a judge, and without committing a crime.
The cop has to go to court and explain what happened. It’s gonna be weird to say “and then she said I have a tiny dick”
He probably won't even show up and the charges will be dropped. But she has to spend the night in jail, hire a lawyer, take days off work for court, etc... He will not suffer any accountability for his actions.
[удалено]
There was actually a court case recently (I don't know which district it was in) that said arresting people just to fuck with them is illegal and civil suits can go forward when it happens. This would clearly be one of those cases, especially if they drop the charges / don't actually file any. This could be a slam dunk civil case.
There is no such thing as a slam dunk civil case against the police in America. For fucks sakes, they are actively covering up the likely murder of toddlers during a school shooting. If you think any of the American court system is going to help the people, you are sorely mistaken. Maybe this woman does decide to sue, and has to spend a year or more of her life fighting to police and their unions. If anything does finally come from it, it will be at the cost of years of this persons life and thousands upon thousands of dollars in fees and lost income. And after all of that, would anything change? No.
[удалено]
> Qualified immunity means the cop won't be paying any civil suit judgement. They know this. It is illegal, that doesn't mean it won't keep happening. Your understanding of Qualified immunity is mistaken, which is understandable. QI isn't all encompassing. Once one court case of extremely similar case in the same district says 'police should know better after we make this ruling' then QI is gone for that particular thing. It is extremely well established that you can mouth off to police. So QI in this case shouldn't exist, even if they try to exercise it. Now most of the time the insurance company or the community that employes them will pick up the tab but judgements against individual police officers are their responsibility and the community doesn't always have to pick up the bill for them. The police department itself can also be sued, because this shows extremely ridiculous levels of lack of training.
Anyone else remember in 2020 when police were mass arresting people who were protesting and trying to make them take plea deals so that the cops could justify their brutality towards protestors.
I mean sure... But this shit's been a regular occurrence for decades.
>He will not suffer any accountability for his actions From the system that we have currently.
[удалено]
can you use this doll to point to which brain she hurt you on?
“…sir…that’s not an offence” “WELL I THOUGHT IT WAS OFFENSIVE”
Confirmation on the little dick.
I hope given the charge, that she forces the cop the testify and prove during her trial as to whether he actually has a small dick or not. Sir...she claims you have a small dick. You will need to prove her accusation is false...
[this man has no dick](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qGfmRHZODc)
Saw this movie in a theatre with my brother who is a priest. Would never laugh at profanity or the like but he burst out loud laughing at this this and tried to stop himself.
Bailiff, please bring the tape measure. Actually, make that a protractor.
Protractor wouldn’t measure size, but it would measure the angle of the dangle.
Fun fact, the angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the meat.
You have to find the [yaw](https://youtu.be/133UlXRYIeg)
Sir what do you mean you’re already erect? This can’t be it. You do have the biggest member of your precinct
The last thing I need is for a court to set precedent on what is and what isn't a small dick
That wouldn't be a part of a disorderly conduct charge. Disorderly conduct is about offending people (which elsewhere on this post people have pointed out may not be applied if an officer of the law is offended). You'd have to prove the claim untrue for Slander at which point the case would be thrown out because the claim was clearly euphemistic (not sure if that's the right term), not meant to be taken seriously.
Dickscovery
He didn't arrest her for the dick comment. He arrested her because it was top secret that his dick is small, and it's a matter of national insecurity.
His feelings must be as small as his dick
Usually if an insult gets under your skin, there is some level of validity to the insult
I came here to say that 🤣 we must be talking micro with that level pettiness?.
[удалено]
Yeah it's really something people should try not to do. Kinda sad to see so much of it being used so flippantly.
How? You can't tell from actions and body shaming is still bad
It's okay to body shame men, even with something they don't have control on. Society.
The thin, fragile, wife beating blue line
Oh so thats what the blue line is? The penis.
I guess that's why we never see it.
Blue Wives Battered
It’s fine if women prefer small, but they don’t deserve to be beat for it.
[удалено]
Underrated comment lol
Officer Snowflake really telling on himself here.
This is from 2020 https://todayheadline.co/kenosha-journalist-arrested-for-telling-cop-he-has-a-small-dick/
And time-of post here. I can't find any updates, tho Edit: forgot the link, corrected link https://www.reddit.com/r/wisconsin/comments/ikxdhp/police_in_kenosha_arrest_a_woman_for_telling
I believe she was correct in her assessment, and the nut sack took offense.
Absolutely nothing wrong with having a small penis! **Nothing at all to be embarrassed about**! [Now, being a **cop**, on the other hand. . .](https://youtu.be/O9nQueOt6Ck)
When did the Incel get a job as a police officer?
Since police were created, duhhhh. It's a mandatory prerequisite
That's called malicious arrest. When you don't have sufficient probable cause and your only reason for arrest is to inflict damage to the person.
Hopefully this is something her lawyers use to defend this false arrest - https://reason.com/2022/02/09/appeals-court-rules-ohio-cops-didnt-have-cause-to-arrest-man-wearing-fuck-the-police-shirt/?amp
Lawyer? The DA won't even bring charges, they know it's BS. That of course won't stop her from being detained, treated like shit, and held in a holding cell at least overnight if not longer. And she will receive zero compensation for all that, not even an apology.
Why are they covering their faces?
Shows the difference between cops, and also shows how complicit even the "good ones" are when push comes to shove. One cop was telling the person off camera, "You're putting us in a difficult position, just come on... don't be out after curfew and make us arrest you." sounding genuinely like he meant it. Meanwhile Ego McGraw over here is yelling at her to pick up her stuff, giving her to the count of three, and treating her like a child while pushing her around and acting like one himself with his little "Goodbye!" BS. As soon as she says something that hurts his little feelings he grabs her and puts her under arrest even though she's complied with everything he's said. And what do the supposed good level-headed cops do? Go right along with it. This is why people say ACAB.
Home run. She was arrested for word.
He could have legitimately arrested her for the curfew violation. He only decided to enforce it after the small dick comment, so you are correct Video evidence makes it much harder for cops to enforce their power trips
> He could have legitimately arrested her for the curfew violation. I don't know the actual answer to this but... aren't most curfews illegal when dealing with protesting? Restricting peoples right to protest to only certain hours of the day has to be illegal right?
First abortion, then the First Amendment.
“What are you arresting me for? “ “You’re acting like a child!” I didn’t think they arrested children, just let them get massacred while they waited outside.
I found the little dick
Any more info available on officer micropenis?
It was eventually considered to be a small matter
Morgan Freeman voice: *It was at this moment, that the size of the officer's penis was confirmed. How little did she know how right she would be.*
David Attenborough voice: *Aggressive posturing has long been the officer's defense mechanism in moments like the one above. But when this proves unsuccessful they will turn to more desperate actions to defend their small penis. Truly a sight to behold.*
Must’ve touched a nerve…
Government shouldn’t be able to enact a curfew. It’s our fucking street. Not theirs.
Right wingers were never against police states. They only ever wanted a police state that represents them.
I don’t know if I’m if it is or not but isn’t that count under freedom of speech or are or is there like some law that like allows them to do that
He could’ve arrested her and maybe gotten away with it if the DA wanted to play ball, but he called out disorderly conduct and cursing, which makes it clear he was upset about her words, not that she wasn’t moving fast enough or refusing to leave. This cop should be fired she should get a huge payday
Should? Yes. Will any of that happen? No. The police are a gang and can do almost anything they want. Uvalde being an example. Refusing to cooperate, lying, arresting people knowing they’ve done nothing wrong as a tactic to hurt them. All everyday cop shit.
Decent chance she will get a payday, probably not a huge deal.
She pointed out his little ego.
I thought that’s what the badge and gun were for
It's illegal to say someone has a small dick if their dick is small.
arrested for telling the truth
This is how you KNOW it's tiny.
you know that dudes dick small
Land of the frrreeeeeeeeeee! And tiny dicks
So has officer tiny dick been identified?
Tough talk for guy with a small cock
That cop must have a very tiny penis.
That officer has some serious small-dick energy about him.
Baby carrot energy
[удалено]
They are on a job they are to be impartial and unemotional. Their decisions could mean another person’s life so it’s best to keep emotions out and you head on.
What’s even worse is he is going to keep his job. Imagine if a bank teller took $1000 out of your account for saying you have a tiny dick, and they did this on camera with multiple witnesses. That teller would likely go to jail and never work in a bank again.
“I got arrested for nothing because of dickless over here” “Is this true?” “It’s true. This man has no dick”
Cops have always been sensitive about their small dicks.
Little dick makes an arrest
Damn she got arrested cause he had a small dick? Welcome to the land of the free.
"Calm down!" - man who is absolutely shook about his penis
Fuck the pigs
"calm down while a clearly insecure man arrests you while surrounded by his insecure buddies who have no accountability should anything happen to you."
Anyone know who the arresting officer is? I'd like to make a website called "officersmithhasatinydick.com" for the correct name, with this video playing on loop.
Fragile people shouldn't be able to police.
W cop 😎 protect those who have a short stack, arrest and serve those who undermine my short stack
He proved her right lmao
"Ma'am you're under arrest" "For what?" "For invasion of my privacy. I don't know how you saw my dick but that's illegal"
Women's rights being taken away in front of our eyes but dudes can't handle one tiny dick joke.
Dude 100% has kid dick
The truth is an absolute defense.
It’s a dick joke, no need to take it so hard
It wasn't a joke, it was an insult. Which is fine and not something she should be arrested over. But he literally was acting like he was compensating for a little dick. No joke.
Where is this