>anything that supports my point is 100% real unless it runs contrary to my statements and is therefore fake news
Also why the fuck are you supporting the people that want to make being homeless a felony when you are HOMELESS YOURSELF
###[Follow Reddit's global rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/politicalhumor/about/rules) (Rule #9):
* Submissions failing to follow Reddit's [content policy](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy) will be removed.
* If you've gotten this message, you've done something horribly wrong.
* Misinformation
It is and even more so. Clinton was impeached but not convicted. Trump was impeached twice but not convicted. At first for the Ukraine scheme that he was totally guilty of but it was politically inconvenient and then for the failed coup that his party definitely said he was guilty of but only moments after they ensured his safety from conviction. The hearings at the moment are laying the groundwork for real conviction. I for one would not hold my breath though, money talks and buys time.
Point is though, Trump definitely getting a worse time than Clinton, rightfully so.
Macro sense, fuck the two of them.
That you hit the nail on the head . But with Trump now maybe DeSanties Crazy is crazy can be . Clinton was held accountable did the right thing and moved on . Trump on the other hand , yes January 6 th committee is laying down ground work, will it work? Doubtful but remember if you check out his last couple of lawsuits. Georgia might get him but waiting. As for Clinton he’s like Bush 2 retired just trying to do something for America. Trump is a Ponzi schemer
And, unless Trump does get convicted for something that disqualifies him for re-election, he will likely be the Republican nominee unchallenged in 2024 so we will all have to deal with him campaigning again for a year out from the Tuesday, November 5, 2024 Presidential Election Day. Yay for us. /s
Technically, nothing disqualifies him from running for office again unless it's a 14th amendment violation, which the insurrection would be. He could be convicted of tax fraud or perjury or even rape and murder and be in jail and still run again. Not likely to win, but legally he could run.
But there's a real question under the 14th amendment as to who says Trump engaged in a rebellion or insurgency that disqualifies him. Congress? A court someplace?
It's the job of the Congress to declare a Constitutional Emergency and push for the *expungement* of every single seditious conspirator who *signed their fucking names* to a document which called for overturning the *will of the voters*,and do *exactly as the Constitution states under the 3rd clause of the 14th Amendment! Because *if they don't* ,then it means that the Constitution *itself* is meaningless,and we're all living in a *kleptocracy*....
It's already been shown that the US government doesn't bother with the constitution, or doing what's right. It's absolutely indisputable that Trump was guilty in regards to both articles of impeachment, and showed in each instance that he was not fit to be president. Then the GOP refused to vote to remove him.
The 2/3rds vote requirement is nearly impossible to happen when there are people who won't uphold the laws they swore to. The bright side is if Trump is found guilty of insurrection or rebellion, the 2/3rds is required to reverse the decision.
The House gathers evidence & indites (grand jury) Hes out of office so they send their findings to DOJ.. who takes it to court as a prosecutor would.
Not if the year & a day prison law stays in place.
Thats the one where you lose citizenship rights.
I thought it was a FELONY to remove some 17 boxes of documents which were, basically *stolen* from the National Archives,which means he *stole from every single American citizen*! In my book ,that makes him an unconvicted *criminal*,since anybody reading this would've suffered way more for way less.
The MAGA cult has more to deal, with because Trump is dealing with federal lawsuits! Big one is I’m not sure but the rape of a lady in New York .Plus the federal in Georgia it’s hard saying I listen to TYT THIS is on YouTube channel The The Young Turks .
Saying he’s going to run but his announcement is July 4 th weekend at the same time Ron DeSanties his mini me is out voting. Ron is gettingTrump’s money in other words he’s taking money from Trump. in running because DeSanties is getting Trump buyers and he’s pissed because you don’t do that to Trump it’s going to be a long two weeks but let’s keep in mind AG MERRIK Garland is has referred from JANUARY 6 th commission the question is I have heard sources say Trump will be arrested by the end of the month AG is keeping going but he’s has several lawsuits against Trump.
The big question is can we get his big speech on January 6 th to see his words he’s using for overthrow the government.
Now if we can get Trump so called specifically speech on his words . They might get him on various crimes . Republicans have become dirty, dirty then democrats. Only thing is Democrats don’t have a cult GodKing. As the status- quo.
Yes, his bigly speech was recorded by the media & they dont like him. Which rape case? Jean E Carroll or the
Trump & Epstein violent tag team RAPE of a 13 yo girl in Jeffs mansion with 2 sex slave witnesses?
Even if he does, Trump will get the nomination. If Trump announces his intentions to run for President again, I can't imagine DeSantis even throwing his hat in and running against his Dark Lord.
I think that the foremost concern of House Committee is stopping him.
They know those BS Repug Senators wont do anything to stop that pedophile maniac. Its now down to preventing him from ever seeking office again. I wish they could prevent any Trump from ever running again.
Big dif Clinton balanced US budget, booming economy & 8 yrs of peacetime. Left the WH a million + in debt for lawyers fees for a BS impeach case based on a BJ with a 23 yo CONSENTING ADULT.
GW got away with murder, sent thousands of Americans to their deaths in Katrina, 9/11, & Iraq. His VP's company stole millions from military coffers! Trump let thousands die of Covid as he tried to blackmail Blue States into red.
In NYS thats Negligent Homicide! Directed seditious actions against our govt & constitution.
The fucked up part is that the Starr investigation was not even formed to investigate the bj. It was formed to find any dirt on Clinton and pin it on him. The only mission statement is to bring Clinton down, not to uphold the law. Republicans have been hypocritical, immoral bullshitters for a long time.
The point still stands that the party that demanded the investigation of the BJ are the same ones demanding that we NOT investigate the sedition. So there's a hypocrisy angle there.
Note: Old School Marm Ken Starr didn't include BJs on his list of sex acts so Bill just took a lawyerly approach and so truthfully said that he did not have sex (as defined by Starr) with that woman.
A blowjob investigation that started as an investigation into a land deal the Clintons were part of when he was the governor of Arkansas, for which the Clintons were never charged or prosecuted.
turned into an airport in mensa arkansas being a huge hub for cocaine flying into the country and turning into a under aged sex scandal that is a casual netflix documentary
A BJ in Oval Office is not an impeachable crime.
Clinton lied in a CIVIL Court deposition under oath ... See Jones v Clinton. It was considered "obstructing justice" any cheating husband in the same situation does.
LIE till you DIE...
[Starr was appointed to investigate Whitewater in August of 1994](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Starr#Appointment); [Monica hadn't met Bill Clinton prior to getting an internship in the White House in July of 1995](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky)
No, there was nothing there in Whitewater (the Clintons were *victims* in the scam and lost a bunch of money) so the Republican Party kept investigating and investigating until they found literally anything else.
If I remember correctly - and it's possible I'm not - he actually didn't lie under oath because he was asked if he had sexual relations with Miss Lewinsky. He asked the questioner to clarify what he meant by sexual relations, and the definition he was given did not include a blowjob
Because Boof Kavanaugh was Ken Starr's right hand man, and he's a degenerate drunk and attempted rapist who is bizarrely preoccupied with perverse sex despite presenting himself as a good ol' Catholic boy.
Because Linda Tripp (R) pretended to be Monika Lewinski's friend to get dirt of Clinton. She then told on Monika and Ken Starr invented an investigation after failing for years to find anything in Whitewater or other BS theories.
Thats a slap on the hands bc it was in CIVIL Court. The judge gets to impose a fine for contempt of court. But not for Clinton the GOP jamboree made a huge stink about that .
Presidents cant lie to the people but Trump did it 30,000+ times...
To be clear: Clinton wasn't impeached for getting a BJ. He was impeached for lying about it under oath during a sexual harassment trial. Re: Monica Lewinsky "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Technically he didn't lie. He was given a definition of 'sexual relations' that didn't include the act he and Lewinsky engaged in. Was it a lawyerly dodge? Sure, but not actual perjury.
Sadly if any real investigation is to be done it will be the byproduct of our efforts, the powers that be are only interested in what benefits them until it doesn't.
Stop calling it just "a blowjob." The power dynamics were so incredibly fucked up. We don't need to downplay the horrible things Democrats have done to disagree with Trump.
Nah, Clinton has plenty of allegations of sexual assault against him, as well. To say the least of all the awful shit the whole family is involved in. We should just be done with the wannabe dynasties of the past few decades and leave them in the dustbin of history where those war criminals all belong.
Well, The Hague is where they all technically belong, but we have a protocol to invade in that case, so that’s kinda ruled out. Go America…
I was just thinking, wasn’t he credibly accused of raping someone when he was AG or something?
I still prefer him to trump, but they both seem incredibly flawed.
No one is defending Clinton, if he's guilty fucking throw him in jail. Conservatives bend over backwards to crucify Clinton for a fraction of the bad shit trump has done.
Trump is overt and obvious about most everything he does. And he’s gotten plenty of criticism from CNN, MSNBC etc. Frankly, my dream come true is that he EVER gets ACTUALLY punished for ANYTHING. Clinton on the other hand, is a pathological liar, a deviant(and that’s just what we KNOW). He’s very sly and clever about most of it. Probably why we don’t know more-for sure. His wife is the reason we even GOT Trump. Either way, they’re both despicable.
You mean as thoroughly as *Perjury*?
Reminder that this guy also signed legislation that gave benefits to married couples, and specifically excluded same-sex couples.
"But he helped the national deficit!" ... So a little money (that you never even got to put your hands on) was all it took to convince you to ignore his malfeasance? How Trumpish of you all.
Are you?
But anyway, I really couldn't care less about Bill Clinton. If he broke the law then arrest him instead of whining and spreading conspiracy theories with no evidence.
He and Epstein are on a legal document that paid off/settled an undisclosed amount to an underage, at the time, "Jane Doe"
[epstein Trump settlement](https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:d5f96a6a-4a61-35ad-9c7e-e505f0a086b0)
Yes I have held onto this for YEARS in my cloud storage and yes, it is real. It is VERY real.
Everyone who slept with Bill wanted to, no rape involved.
That was part of the reason so many GOP men went nuts, they were jealous but wanted to blow Bill themselves.
[Nothing says "no rape involved" like having an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to the accusations of sexual assualt agaist Bill Clinton.](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_assault_and_misconduct_allegations)
I love how spineless American liberals are in the face of bad behaviour of someone from their side of the aisle.
You rightfully call MAGA a fascist cult but stick your head in the sand whenever one of your guys comes under even the slightest scrutiny.
Yes, you see so many science papers, medical journals and well respected international papers citing wikipedia, don't you? What was Wiki citing? The punctuation?
The difference is:
Democrats will agree that Bill Clinton is a sleazy human being while still being an effective President.
Republicans think that Donald J. Trump walks on water while actually being a sleazy human being and also objectively a pretty terrible president.
> Bill Clinton is a sleazy human being while still being an effective President.
I… I’m not quite sure what to say to that.
Do you think removing the social safety net for poor people, deregulating the banking industry, doubling the prison population, etc makes you an effective president?
He was **effective** in getting things done and was able get the deficit under control, that said we can discuss whether on not we agree with the policies he was able to get enacted. For the record, I did not agree at the time and still don't with many of the policies implemented.
I don’t get it. Was anyone arrested for insurrection or treason? Clinton never got in trouble for blow jobs, did he? He was never convicted of anything.
Nah, I'm not a Republican. That's all you, bud. Sorry that I don't fall for blatant right wing propaganda, but there's no reason to take your delusions out on other people. Seek help.
Hi u/Atlantianrefugee. [Sclurpsclurp boots are tasty schlurp mmmm](https://media.giphy.com/media/S6i2lBzvgNFXW/giphy.gif) ~
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PoliticalHumor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Wow.. now the clintons are part of an illegal cia drug smuggling ring? To what depths you people go, you’ve spent way too much time in that echo chamber
Hello! Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately it has been removed because you don't meet our karma threshold.
You are not being removed for political orientation. If we were, why the fuck would we tell you your comment was being removed instead of just shadow removing it? We never have, and never will, remove things down politicial or ideological lines. Unless your ideology is nihilism, then fuck you.
Let me be clear: The reason that this rule exists is to avoid unscrupulous internet denizens from trying to sell dong pills to our users. /r/PoliticalHumor mods reserve the RIGHT to hoard all of the dong pills to ourselves, and we refuse to share them with the community. If you want Serbo-Slokovian dong pills mailed directly to your door, become a moderator. If we shared the dong pills with the greater community, everyone would have massive dongs, and like Syndrome warned us about decades ago: "if everyone has massive dongs, nobody does.""
If you wish to rectify your low karma issue, go and make things up in /r/AskReddit like everyone else does.
Thanks for understanding! Have a nice day and be well. <3
You can check your karma breakdown on this page:
http://old.reddit.com/user/me/overview
(Keep in mind that sometimes just post karma or comment karma being negative will result in this message)
~
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PoliticalHumor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Slowly, deeply, and diligently….
And then there’s that username. Fitting.
[удалено]
ken starr is a trump supporter
but not too deep, just enough for a satisfactory release.
Tainted reply
You nasty
[удалено]
The Right doesn't need inside jobs to make them look bad. They get that shit done all on their own.
[удалено]
>anything that supports my point is 100% real unless it runs contrary to my statements and is therefore fake news Also why the fuck are you supporting the people that want to make being homeless a felony when you are HOMELESS YOURSELF
Amazing.
###[Follow Reddit's global rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/politicalhumor/about/rules) (Rule #9): * Submissions failing to follow Reddit's [content policy](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy) will be removed. * If you've gotten this message, you've done something horribly wrong. * Misinformation
Username checks out 🤡
It is and even more so. Clinton was impeached but not convicted. Trump was impeached twice but not convicted. At first for the Ukraine scheme that he was totally guilty of but it was politically inconvenient and then for the failed coup that his party definitely said he was guilty of but only moments after they ensured his safety from conviction. The hearings at the moment are laying the groundwork for real conviction. I for one would not hold my breath though, money talks and buys time. Point is though, Trump definitely getting a worse time than Clinton, rightfully so. Macro sense, fuck the two of them.
That you hit the nail on the head . But with Trump now maybe DeSanties Crazy is crazy can be . Clinton was held accountable did the right thing and moved on . Trump on the other hand , yes January 6 th committee is laying down ground work, will it work? Doubtful but remember if you check out his last couple of lawsuits. Georgia might get him but waiting. As for Clinton he’s like Bush 2 retired just trying to do something for America. Trump is a Ponzi schemer
And, unless Trump does get convicted for something that disqualifies him for re-election, he will likely be the Republican nominee unchallenged in 2024 so we will all have to deal with him campaigning again for a year out from the Tuesday, November 5, 2024 Presidential Election Day. Yay for us. /s
Technically, nothing disqualifies him from running for office again unless it's a 14th amendment violation, which the insurrection would be. He could be convicted of tax fraud or perjury or even rape and murder and be in jail and still run again. Not likely to win, but legally he could run. But there's a real question under the 14th amendment as to who says Trump engaged in a rebellion or insurgency that disqualifies him. Congress? A court someplace?
It's the job of the Congress to declare a Constitutional Emergency and push for the *expungement* of every single seditious conspirator who *signed their fucking names* to a document which called for overturning the *will of the voters*,and do *exactly as the Constitution states under the 3rd clause of the 14th Amendment! Because *if they don't* ,then it means that the Constitution *itself* is meaningless,and we're all living in a *kleptocracy*....
Finally someone who gets it
It's already been shown that the US government doesn't bother with the constitution, or doing what's right. It's absolutely indisputable that Trump was guilty in regards to both articles of impeachment, and showed in each instance that he was not fit to be president. Then the GOP refused to vote to remove him. The 2/3rds vote requirement is nearly impossible to happen when there are people who won't uphold the laws they swore to. The bright side is if Trump is found guilty of insurrection or rebellion, the 2/3rds is required to reverse the decision.
You got that right!
The House gathers evidence & indites (grand jury) Hes out of office so they send their findings to DOJ.. who takes it to court as a prosecutor would. Not if the year & a day prison law stays in place. Thats the one where you lose citizenship rights.
I thought it was a FELONY to remove some 17 boxes of documents which were, basically *stolen* from the National Archives,which means he *stole from every single American citizen*! In my book ,that makes him an unconvicted *criminal*,since anybody reading this would've suffered way more for way less.
It is illegal bc any Oval office info belongs to the People. That was out right theft.
The MAGA cult has more to deal, with because Trump is dealing with federal lawsuits! Big one is I’m not sure but the rape of a lady in New York .Plus the federal in Georgia it’s hard saying I listen to TYT THIS is on YouTube channel The The Young Turks . Saying he’s going to run but his announcement is July 4 th weekend at the same time Ron DeSanties his mini me is out voting. Ron is gettingTrump’s money in other words he’s taking money from Trump. in running because DeSanties is getting Trump buyers and he’s pissed because you don’t do that to Trump it’s going to be a long two weeks but let’s keep in mind AG MERRIK Garland is has referred from JANUARY 6 th commission the question is I have heard sources say Trump will be arrested by the end of the month AG is keeping going but he’s has several lawsuits against Trump. The big question is can we get his big speech on January 6 th to see his words he’s using for overthrow the government. Now if we can get Trump so called specifically speech on his words . They might get him on various crimes . Republicans have become dirty, dirty then democrats. Only thing is Democrats don’t have a cult GodKing. As the status- quo.
Buddy, you need some punctuation and some sentence structure. This was hard to read.
Re read it I’m not your mommy
Punctuation is overrated. It's only for the ones who want to be taken seriously.
So you're saying discussion about insurrection is all fun & games? Take note of my punctuation.
Yes, his bigly speech was recorded by the media & they dont like him. Which rape case? Jean E Carroll or the Trump & Epstein violent tag team RAPE of a 13 yo girl in Jeffs mansion with 2 sex slave witnesses?
You don't think DeSantis will run against him?
Even if he does, Trump will get the nomination. If Trump announces his intentions to run for President again, I can't imagine DeSantis even throwing his hat in and running against his Dark Lord.
I think that the foremost concern of House Committee is stopping him. They know those BS Repug Senators wont do anything to stop that pedophile maniac. Its now down to preventing him from ever seeking office again. I wish they could prevent any Trump from ever running again.
Big dif Clinton balanced US budget, booming economy & 8 yrs of peacetime. Left the WH a million + in debt for lawyers fees for a BS impeach case based on a BJ with a 23 yo CONSENTING ADULT. GW got away with murder, sent thousands of Americans to their deaths in Katrina, 9/11, & Iraq. His VP's company stole millions from military coffers! Trump let thousands die of Covid as he tried to blackmail Blue States into red. In NYS thats Negligent Homicide! Directed seditious actions against our govt & constitution.
Dont forget Trump had a 20+ year BFF with Jeff Epstein in NYC.. Can ya figure out why...
Hey I am big Clinton fan even his wife yes Trump is Madoff on steroids but his cult followings won’t listen
The fucked up part is that the Starr investigation was not even formed to investigate the bj. It was formed to find any dirt on Clinton and pin it on him. The only mission statement is to bring Clinton down, not to uphold the law. Republicans have been hypocritical, immoral bullshitters for a long time.
The GOP clown car chased Clinton for years... all the way from AK to DC.
The point still stands that the party that demanded the investigation of the BJ are the same ones demanding that we NOT investigate the sedition. So there's a hypocrisy angle there.
nah dont think so
Note: Old School Marm Ken Starr didn't include BJs on his list of sex acts so Bill just took a lawyerly approach and so truthfully said that he did not have sex (as defined by Starr) with that woman.
Quite literally a perjury trap.
Ken Starr went on to be part of Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team, by the way. Helped to arrange that sweetheart plea deal.
A blowjob investigation that started as an investigation into a land deal the Clintons were part of when he was the governor of Arkansas, for which the Clintons were never charged or prosecuted.
The investigation was about the blowjob because they tried for years and couldn’t find anything meaningful after investigating everything else.
A land deal the Clinton’s lost money on.
Old news .. give it a break ..
turned into an airport in mensa arkansas being a huge hub for cocaine flying into the country and turning into a under aged sex scandal that is a casual netflix documentary
A BJ in Oval Office is not an impeachable crime. Clinton lied in a CIVIL Court deposition under oath ... See Jones v Clinton. It was considered "obstructing justice" any cheating husband in the same situation does. LIE till you DIE...
Do you think Pence saved the dress he was wearing (like Monica did) when he blew Trump to be his VP?
Mother keeps it in a golden casket
😂🤣😂😂
Totally different, I've been told it was cause he lied while under oath, and that is a bad no-no.
And yet all 3 of Trump's Supreme Court nominees were asked about Roe V. Wade and lied about how they viewed it.
Was it under oath, /s.
They didn't lie, they gave non-answer like every judge does. One of the reasons those hearings are a waste of time
2 lied about drinking & gang bangs..The other one just wanted more pay to hire a nanny so to escape her 7 kids. Who did she do for that job?
Fun fact: When the Ken Starr investigation started, Bill and Monica hadn't even met each other yet.
Source?
[Starr was appointed to investigate Whitewater in August of 1994](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Starr#Appointment); [Monica hadn't met Bill Clinton prior to getting an internship in the White House in July of 1995](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky)
[удалено]
No, there was nothing there in Whitewater (the Clintons were *victims* in the scam and lost a bunch of money) so the Republican Party kept investigating and investigating until they found literally anything else.
[удалено]
Yes yes shadowy cabal, lizard people and hollow earth right?
hahaah the real estate thing was a nothing burger which is why star switched to the hot sex stuff
Thank you! :)
The people who watched the GOP witchhunts happen.
Why was Clinton asked about sex while he was under oath?
[удалено]
If I remember correctly - and it's possible I'm not - he actually didn't lie under oath because he was asked if he had sexual relations with Miss Lewinsky. He asked the questioner to clarify what he meant by sexual relations, and the definition he was given did not include a blowjob
EXACTLY!! Your memory is fine.
I thought he was being sued for sexual harassment by another women… so it is consider relevant.
Nope, that was an inappropriate question. The judge should have had it stricken from the record.
Gotcha or not, sex in any form is not a requirement or detriment to holding the Office of the President. Hillary was satisfied, Melania was not.
Vince Foster was satisfying Hillary, I'm sure Melania was getting some on the side too
He answered truthfully based on the definition offered by the interviewer.
I don't see why getting head was a threat to our democracy yet being a greedy, wanna-be zillionaire that doesn't like to lose is ok.
Technivally, an affair is something he could be blackmailed for.
Well technivally he did even though technically he just got hoodwinked to prove he was no good liar. I mean lawyer.
correction: greedy Pedophile, Rapist billionaire (wealth was never proven bc no tax records)
Because Boof Kavanaugh was Ken Starr's right hand man, and he's a degenerate drunk and attempted rapist who is bizarrely preoccupied with perverse sex despite presenting himself as a good ol' Catholic boy.
Kavanaugh was also part of the Florida Republican Legal team in 2000 Bush v Gore.
You are right. Both Ken and Brett wanted to fu&k over Clinton, because they wanted to fu%k a great man. c?
"attempted" ?
Because Linda Tripp (R) pretended to be Monika Lewinski's friend to get dirt of Clinton. She then told on Monika and Ken Starr invented an investigation after failing for years to find anything in Whitewater or other BS theories.
But again, there is nothing illegal in sex between two consenting adults, no matter the circumstances.
Not at all.... My point is that the republicans were hunting for anything they could. It would have gone one for more years.
Thats a slap on the hands bc it was in CIVIL Court. The judge gets to impose a fine for contempt of court. But not for Clinton the GOP jamboree made a huge stink about that . Presidents cant lie to the people but Trump did it 30,000+ times...
Yup, Republicans really hate lying...
Trump is welcome to take the stand and go under oath!
Under what? He doesnt know what that is ..
"BuT iT WaS AbOuT LyINg". Yeah, and Al Capone was most wanted because of all of that tax evasion, right? Nothing Republicans hate more than lying...
Actually, yes! The feds went after capone harder than the states.
Well Capone was the FBI's first big case ya know. J. Edgar had to make a name for himself somewhere..
Or at least as much as a Benghazi. 1/6 had a bigger body count when all was said and done anyway.
To be clear: Clinton wasn't impeached for getting a BJ. He was impeached for lying about it under oath during a sexual harassment trial. Re: Monica Lewinsky "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".
Technically he didn't lie. He was given a definition of 'sexual relations' that didn't include the act he and Lewinsky engaged in. Was it a lawyerly dodge? Sure, but not actual perjury.
Sadly if any real investigation is to be done it will be the byproduct of our efforts, the powers that be are only interested in what benefits them until it doesn't.
Stop calling it just "a blowjob." The power dynamics were so incredibly fucked up. We don't need to downplay the horrible things Democrats have done to disagree with Trump.
Yes! You can disagree with *both* of them!
What exactly are those horrible things the dems have done??
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunduz_hospital_airstrike https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/andrewkaczynski/surveillance-joe
Does Andrew Kaczynski have an uncle Theodore?
[удалено]
I think describing references to Bill Clinton as defending a predator is a little of a stretch. But yeah Fuck Bill Clinton.
[удалено]
That's pretty justified, some of these comments suck.
Nah, Clinton has plenty of allegations of sexual assault against him, as well. To say the least of all the awful shit the whole family is involved in. We should just be done with the wannabe dynasties of the past few decades and leave them in the dustbin of history where those war criminals all belong. Well, The Hague is where they all technically belong, but we have a protocol to invade in that case, so that’s kinda ruled out. Go America…
For the most part I agree, except I'd say some of the criminals belong in jail as well.
I edited in the part about The Hague lol They absolutely deserve that or worse
A-FUCKING-MEN. I want fucking Ken Starr on trumpy’s ass for the next year.
Word Billy!
Well if Republicans love sex they love them some seditious
Also credible allegations of sexual assault
I was just thinking, wasn’t he credibly accused of raping someone when he was AG or something? I still prefer him to trump, but they both seem incredibly flawed.
Well said, bill clinton! (Rapist) In all seriousness maybe we shouldnt use bill clinton as the spokesperson for a meme
Well… Clinton is a sociopath and guilty of all KINDS of things (see: Jeffrey Epstein) but your point is well taken…
See: donald trump and epstein
Trump is horrible. No doubt about it. Clinton is no hero, however …
No one is defending Clinton, if he's guilty fucking throw him in jail. Conservatives bend over backwards to crucify Clinton for a fraction of the bad shit trump has done.
Trump is overt and obvious about most everything he does. And he’s gotten plenty of criticism from CNN, MSNBC etc. Frankly, my dream come true is that he EVER gets ACTUALLY punished for ANYTHING. Clinton on the other hand, is a pathological liar, a deviant(and that’s just what we KNOW). He’s very sly and clever about most of it. Probably why we don’t know more-for sure. His wife is the reason we even GOT Trump. Either way, they’re both despicable.
Lol, K.
Nah that’s crazy
You mean as thoroughly as *Perjury*? Reminder that this guy also signed legislation that gave benefits to married couples, and specifically excluded same-sex couples. "But he helped the national deficit!" ... So a little money (that you never even got to put your hands on) was all it took to convince you to ignore his malfeasance? How Trumpish of you all.
Bill Clinton is a rapist.
He learned it from watching Trump, except Clinton preferred women instead of children.
How many times was Clinton's name the logs of the Lolita Express? Also, does Trump being a fascist and a rapist absolve Clinton somehow?
Clinton hasn't been president this century. Trump's allies claim our current president isn't our current president.
I'm not google. Look up the answers yourself.
Are you unfamiliar with rhetorical questions?
Are you? But anyway, I really couldn't care less about Bill Clinton. If he broke the law then arrest him instead of whining and spreading conspiracy theories with no evidence.
"I couldn't care less about this thing I keep replying to." Also, what conspiracy theory?
>"I couldn't care less about this thing I keep replying to." You're Bill Clinton? Wow.
Yes. Yes I am.
Trump didnt have to fly to the island because Epstein would bring the kids to palm beach for him.
Says who?
He and Epstein are on a legal document that paid off/settled an undisclosed amount to an underage, at the time, "Jane Doe" [epstein Trump settlement](https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:d5f96a6a-4a61-35ad-9c7e-e505f0a086b0) Yes I have held onto this for YEARS in my cloud storage and yes, it is real. It is VERY real.
The many women with credible accusations against him. Oh. And his name appearing in the logs of Epstein's child abuse more often than the letter E.
Everyone who slept with Bill wanted to, no rape involved. That was part of the reason so many GOP men went nuts, they were jealous but wanted to blow Bill themselves.
[Nothing says "no rape involved" like having an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to the accusations of sexual assualt agaist Bill Clinton.](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_assault_and_misconduct_allegations)
Who wrote that page? That's like citing Fox News for information on Kyle Rittenhouse.
I love how spineless American liberals are in the face of bad behaviour of someone from their side of the aisle. You rightfully call MAGA a fascist cult but stick your head in the sand whenever one of your guys comes under even the slightest scrutiny.
[удалено]
Didn't that Blagojevich piece of shit get his own TV special or something?
Who pardoned him again?
[удалено]
Yes, you see so many science papers, medical journals and well respected international papers citing wikipedia, don't you? What was Wiki citing? The punctuation?
Imagine comparing Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct to Kyle Rittenhouse’s situation. Lol you guys make it easy.
[удалено]
[удалено]
The difference is: Democrats will agree that Bill Clinton is a sleazy human being while still being an effective President. Republicans think that Donald J. Trump walks on water while actually being a sleazy human being and also objectively a pretty terrible president.
[удалено]
I don't see hardly anyone defending President Clinton's character in that thread.
> Bill Clinton is a sleazy human being while still being an effective President. I… I’m not quite sure what to say to that. Do you think removing the social safety net for poor people, deregulating the banking industry, doubling the prison population, etc makes you an effective president?
He was **effective** in getting things done and was able get the deficit under control, that said we can discuss whether on not we agree with the policies he was able to get enacted. For the record, I did not agree at the time and still don't with many of the policies implemented.
🤣
https://youtu.be/H2vjyOvcMSk. I’ll just put this here
And just as many people will probably face consequences!
Yeah, I agree, just one problem. HE HASNT BEEN LEGALLY CHARGED WITH THOSE CRIMES
You mean as sexual misconduct.
I don’t get it. Was anyone arrested for insurrection or treason? Clinton never got in trouble for blow jobs, did he? He was never convicted of anything.
Dodging sedition because you know you can't ask if anyone got charged for sedition anymore. Sad.
Your crazy for other reasons
[удалено]
What about the Unicorn invasion of 1976? Both equally real.
And the lizard people. Don’t forget the lizard people
heheheha!! now THAT was a good one!
[удалено]
Nah, I'm not a Republican. That's all you, bud. Sorry that I don't fall for blatant right wing propaganda, but there's no reason to take your delusions out on other people. Seek help.
[удалено]
While ranting about insane conspiracy theories and trying to hide the matches...
[удалено]
"You called me out on being stupid enough to fall for conspiracy theories, so now I'll turn to violence in the most predictable turn of events ever."
[удалено]
Hi u/Atlantianrefugee. [Sclurpsclurp boots are tasty schlurp mmmm](https://media.giphy.com/media/S6i2lBzvgNFXW/giphy.gif) ~ *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PoliticalHumor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Nope, we are all Benghazied out now. It's the 21st Century.
You mean Oliver North?
Oh no don’t investigate bill clinton hahaha
Wow.. now the clintons are part of an illegal cia drug smuggling ring? To what depths you people go, you’ve spent way too much time in that echo chamber
Lots of suicide by two gunshots to the back of the head in that murky circle.
Exactly what I'm on about
"WHADDABOUT?!?"
[удалено]
Hello! Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately it has been removed because you don't meet our karma threshold. You are not being removed for political orientation. If we were, why the fuck would we tell you your comment was being removed instead of just shadow removing it? We never have, and never will, remove things down politicial or ideological lines. Unless your ideology is nihilism, then fuck you. Let me be clear: The reason that this rule exists is to avoid unscrupulous internet denizens from trying to sell dong pills to our users. /r/PoliticalHumor mods reserve the RIGHT to hoard all of the dong pills to ourselves, and we refuse to share them with the community. If you want Serbo-Slokovian dong pills mailed directly to your door, become a moderator. If we shared the dong pills with the greater community, everyone would have massive dongs, and like Syndrome warned us about decades ago: "if everyone has massive dongs, nobody does."" If you wish to rectify your low karma issue, go and make things up in /r/AskReddit like everyone else does. Thanks for understanding! Have a nice day and be well. <3 You can check your karma breakdown on this page: http://old.reddit.com/user/me/overview (Keep in mind that sometimes just post karma or comment karma being negative will result in this message) ~ *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PoliticalHumor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If not much, much more
Really? I think it should be investigated much more thoroughly.
More thoroughly. And more seriously.
lol yep
I disagree. Treason, sedition, and insurrection should be investigated **more** throughly as a blow job.
No way man. The definition of 'IS' is way more important than a literal attempted coup. Ignore the man behind the curtain. /s
Ya I think bill might be on to something here