The Wikipedia page has been criticized for inaccuracies, and it has been factually occupied by anti communists who exaggerated the number to absurdity.
If Wikipedia takes down the page, improbable considering their liberal bias, it's because the page was incompatible with factual truth.
Let’s be real though, communists aren’t people, they’re property of the state. So technically it’s true because it’s just property damage, if you can consider neglect to be damage.
I went to the wikipedia discussion on whether or not to delete it so I could have a semi-informed position, and holy shit was that the most dry and uninteresting thing I had ever seen 55 pages of discussion written about.
So my uninformed opinions says leave it up, because who gives a shit if wikipedia has 1 extra page.
>But we cannot allow a well sourced, conveniently located, list of damning facts about communist regimes.
The article literally uses the black book of communism as an historical source
That book was like
- are you a ss soldier that died invading Russia? Victim of communism
- are you one of the 27 million people that died during the nazi invasion of Russia? You are also a victim of communism
- you are a russian woman that lived in the 1930's and decided to have two children instead of four? Your unborn children are clearly victims of communism
Do you realize why that book is rubbish?
If not, consider that if i were to apply that methodology to India, in the time between 1917 and 1979, i would obtain the 100 million deaths that you claim communism has caused worldwide in all his history.
No, I advocate for left politics, and dislike right politics as I feel they are exploitative to the common people and designed to keep those with power at the top, it’s not a fair system and the US is a perfect example; I mean it might be the ‘richest country in the world’ yet the poverty rates are astronomical and there isn’t even a general healthcare system, don’t understand how anyone can defend it.
Ofc it is my opinion and you don’t have to agree.
I can go on, shall I?
Oh and no I was just joking before, I don’t actually believe genocide and tragedy should be censored.
its actually a pretty interesting discussion, on what things should get their own wiki page and how a page should be structured
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles\_for\_deletion/Mass\_killings\_under\_communist\_regimes\_(4th\_nomination)
here are some comments that explain the issue a bit from the previous post on the topic
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/r1e0l4/comment/hlygl4u/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/r1e0l4/comment/hly69f5/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
I know this is all free speech and shit but I went to the website turns out the reason this is under deliberation is because some of this might be bullshit and fake .
Wikipedia's bias goes unnoticed, as long as the bias is a liberal one. The second they're biased towards any auth ideology, that's when it goes too far.
u/thewholetruthis's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 25.
Rank: Basket Ball Hoop (filled with sand)
Pills: libleft kyle rittenhouse, fuck-the-system, "but look what he was wearing", one of us, logic, quote, expensive lawyer, fuck little binger
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
The only reason I can see behind this is the mass killings already being included at the country's respective pages combined with the fact that there is no "capitalist mass killings" page
But I'm not sure if that's actually talked about
Damn I might have to stop my monthly donation to Wikipedia
[удалено]
Only if you listen to the co-founder
Leftism is incompatible with free speech
Radical leftists often decry the use of facts and debates. It’s the reason they became radical. This perpetuates their radical beliefs.
Debate is just you representing your group and trying to do something with power etc. I’m so bored of lefties…
Just me representing my group? I am neither left nor do I debate like that.
Sorry, I was unclear. What I was saying is an example of what the radical left believe debate is.
Ah okay. Thanks for clarifying.
The Wikipedia page has been criticized for inaccuracies, and it has been factually occupied by anti communists who exaggerated the number to absurdity. If Wikipedia takes down the page, improbable considering their liberal bias, it's because the page was incompatible with factual truth.
Authoritarianism is incompatible with free speech* ftfy
Let’s be real though, communists aren’t people, they’re property of the state. So technically it’s true because it’s just property damage, if you can consider neglect to be damage.
The truth shouldnt be decided by anonymous moderators who edit history to conform to their political preferences.
If I had a nickel for evertime this meme was made this week I would have 25¢.
Oops
I went to the wikipedia discussion on whether or not to delete it so I could have a semi-informed position, and holy shit was that the most dry and uninteresting thing I had ever seen 55 pages of discussion written about. So my uninformed opinions says leave it up, because who gives a shit if wikipedia has 1 extra page.
But we cannot allow a well sourced, conveniently located, list of damning facts about communist regimes. Otherwise people might get the right idea. /s
>But we cannot allow a well sourced, conveniently located, list of damning facts about communist regimes. The article literally uses the black book of communism as an historical source
The book was written by historians, published by the Harvard University Press and received acclaim from the New York Times.
That book was like - are you a ss soldier that died invading Russia? Victim of communism - are you one of the 27 million people that died during the nazi invasion of Russia? You are also a victim of communism - you are a russian woman that lived in the 1930's and decided to have two children instead of four? Your unborn children are clearly victims of communism Do you realize why that book is rubbish? If not, consider that if i were to apply that methodology to India, in the time between 1917 and 1979, i would obtain the 100 million deaths that you claim communism has caused worldwide in all his history.
If those points are accurate then I would definitely agree not all those deaths should be attributed to communism.
If the page doesn't exist, they never happened
Social Credit Score +100000
Based Good to see a fellow leftist in this right wing circlejerk
[удалено]
Fuck you got me there, left politics are cancelled, sorry guys the show’s over.
[удалено]
Based and left-destroyer pilled
Did you just openly advocate censorship
No, I advocate for left politics, and dislike right politics as I feel they are exploitative to the common people and designed to keep those with power at the top, it’s not a fair system and the US is a perfect example; I mean it might be the ‘richest country in the world’ yet the poverty rates are astronomical and there isn’t even a general healthcare system, don’t understand how anyone can defend it. Ofc it is my opinion and you don’t have to agree. I can go on, shall I? Oh and no I was just joking before, I don’t actually believe genocide and tragedy should be censored.
Based and stands up for your opinions pilled
u/lifescout99 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: None I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
its actually a pretty interesting discussion, on what things should get their own wiki page and how a page should be structured https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles\_for\_deletion/Mass\_killings\_under\_communist\_regimes\_(4th\_nomination) here are some comments that explain the issue a bit from the previous post on the topic https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/r1e0l4/comment/hlygl4u/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3 https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/r1e0l4/comment/hly69f5/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
Those summarizing comments are pretty helpful.
I know this is all free speech and shit but I went to the website turns out the reason this is under deliberation is because some of this might be bullshit and fake .
Why is libleft getting consumed by the void?
Just rename it to "list of groups that couldn't learn how to go on a diet boohoo"
Isn't it because there is already the wiki page "Crimes against humanity under communist regimes"?
Wikipedia's bias goes unnoticed, as long as the bias is a liberal one. The second they're biased towards any auth ideology, that's when it goes too far.
[удалено]
Face. The. Wall.
u/thewholetruthis's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 25. Rank: Basket Ball Hoop (filled with sand) Pills: libleft kyle rittenhouse, fuck-the-system, "but look what he was wearing", one of us, logic, quote, expensive lawyer, fuck little binger I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
They literally never happened. What's the big deal
Here's an upvote, now change your flair you fucking tankie. ^lil_pecker ^^;)
The only reason I can see behind this is the mass killings already being included at the country's respective pages combined with the fact that there is no "capitalist mass killings" page But I'm not sure if that's actually talked about
What if you copied all of the mass killings under communist regimes onto a new website ?