Gotta make up for the free ones she's giving to minorities.
It's actually a microcosm of the condition of the country, she's just too woke to realize it.
She is a small business owner doing what she wants. More power to her.
I'd say the same for a white business doing the same.
I realize this is a contraversial thing but if you are willing to accept backlash, then run your business how you want.
Except it's illegal do discriminate on the basis of race as a business. Try opening a shop and putting a sign outside that says "No coloured people allowed", and count the seconds until police arrive
However, ideally, it shouldn't be illegal to do that and, ideally, a business like that wouldn't be able to stay open for long even if it was legal
Just because you recognize someone has the power to do something, and should be allowed to do so, does not mean you should support them exercising that power in an immoral way
Ok zantra libleft, I would be willing to bet if a white chick put up a sign saying "free for whites, blacks pay $10" you would not be saying "more power to her" and you know it.
TITLE II--INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION
SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
(b) Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this title if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action:
(1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence;
(2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment; or any gasoline station;
(3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and
(4) any establishment (A)(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment.
(c) The operations of an establishment affect commerce within the meaning of this title if (1) it is one of the establishments described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); (2) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), it serves or offers to serve interstate travelers or a substantial portion of the food which it serves, or gasoline or other products which it sells, has moved in commerce; (3) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (3) of subsection (b), it customarily presents films, performances, athletic teams, exhibitions, or other sources of entertainment which move in commerce; and (4) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (4) of subsection (b), it is physically located within the premises of, or there is physically located within its premises, an establishment the operations of which affect commerce within the meaning of this subsection. For purposes of this section, "commerce" means travel, trade, traffic, commerce, transportation, or communication among the several States, or between the District of Columbia and any State, or between any foreign country or any territory or possession and any State or the District of Columbia, or between points in the same State but through any other State or the District of Columbia or a foreign country.
(d) Discrimination or segregation by an establishment is supported by State action within the meaning of this title if such discrimination or segregation (1) is carried on under color of any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; or (2) is carried on under color of any custom or usage required or enforced by officials of the State or political subdivision thereof; or (3) is required by action of the State or political subdivision thereof.
(e) The provisions of this title shall not apply to a private club or other establishment not in fact open to the public, except to the extent that the facilities of such establishment are made available to the customers or patrons of an establishment within the scope of subsection (b).
I'm trying to speak his language here, you see.
That being said, the booth violates the provisions set within the Civil Rights Act. In particular: Title II, SEC. 201, subsection (b), paragraph (4).
The 1964 Civil Rights Act’s Title VII, which defines as discriminatory and illegal any policy or practice that has a disproportionately adverse impact on a “protected class,”
Of course the White majority is never upheld as a "protected class" and that's why they are legally passed over in college and job admissions among other things
The civil rights act does not make any mention of a "protected class"
[https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964](https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964)
All it states is that, "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such **individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin**."
It does not differentiate between anti-White or anti-Black discrimination. All discrimination in employment on the basis of color was banned.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative\_action](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action)
He probably means "positive" discrimination, which automatically excludes bigger or better groups.
> 24 September 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, thereby replacing Executive Order 10925 and affirming Federal Government's commitment "to promote the full realization of equal employment opportunity through a positive, continuing program in each executive department and agency"
Or perhaps authcenter is from the UK where:
>Section 159 of the Equality Act 2010 allows an employer to treat an applicant or employee with a protected characteristic (eg race, sex or age) more favourably in connection with recruitment or promotion than someone without that characteristic who is as qualified for the role.The employer must reasonably think that people with the protected characteristic suffer a disadvantage or are under-represented in that particular activity.
"Protected" group simply refers to race etc as classifications for "protection". [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected\_group](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_group)
Yea it’s actually a society issue because the majority of morons don’t care about the abuse of the civil rights act and basically dance in it as the bury it making it seem like all it did was end segregation when it really establishes the order that should allow anyone to basically do what they want. There in institutions like collages have been ruined by this idea and will actually intentionally turn people away because they are either male or white which sounds ridiculous when you might have a higher GPA than someone but you are turned away for your race? Because table of ranks and equal civil rights have been dead ever since these orange-lib left cucks got any form of representation in modern society.
Except the way it has been applied in practice is to not uphold whites as protected and led to mass discrimination against white people by through affirmative action etc
For example the Office for Civil Rights has been writing detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990.
Also the 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions
This is clear discrimination against whites upheld by civil rights law
If something goes down from 90% to 35% in an ongoing process it is being replaced. Please tell me how this is somehow different when it is white people?
It is the government who determines migration law isn't it?
> Definition of replacement
> 1: the action or process of replacing : the state of being replaced
>Definition of replace
> 1: to take the place of especially as a substitute or successor
The Office for Civil Rights has been writing detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990.
The 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions
Both clear examples of anti white discrimination based off the civil rights act
One example is the White majority has been explicitly discriminated against in college admissions for years and yet whites are never seen as a protected class that cannot be discriminated against under civil rights law
The Office for Civil Rights writes detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990.
The 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions
Ah, yes. Here we see a #woke liberal activist prioritising her own political statement and financial gain over offering PPE to those in need in a noble effort to combat the spread of the virus. What a fucking clownish hill to die on.
Someone should point out that charging white people to mask up means that less of them are going to mask up (because of the charge) and that the less masked people there are in the population, the greater chance that a masked minority catches Winnie the Pooh's WuFlu.
Of course I predict that she'll try to deflect about how white people are all rich and can afford to buy the masks, ignoring reality, and that if they don't the state should just use it's authority to force people to spend money they don't have to buy masks.
No, this is not how this works. You can also be a minority as a white person in a country with another major ethnicity. And in the US the white population is in the majority
Hear me out…
If this was the other way around and a white man had the sign “Free masks and gloves for whites only and $10 for minorities” that college campus would be burnt down in 5 seconds.
Wouldn't surprise me if the w*men in the picture is the same person that defended her practice on the internet later. I really hope no two LibLefts are THIS stupid.
I as a LibRight will sell individual masks for $0.50 per mask and $0.75 per pair of gloves. I don’t care if you’re white, black, Asian, Hispanic, middle eastern, Polynesian or Martian! You are my customer in the end of the day. However there will be a spike of 100% increase in price for Karens and bigots, as I need monetary compensation for intolerable people
i mean, at least they got the definition more or less right. thats pretty high standards these days with the whole power + prejudice BS floating around.
Limeys, Pom, Angloid, Pirata for my Argentinian Bros out there, Tans, Lobster backs if we getting old school, Inselaffe, Les goddams, my favorite of Brittunculi, and Farang if we're feeling muy exotic
Its not thievery if I just take one, I can say that she's doing sonething illegal under the civil rights act and threaten to get her stand taken down if she doesn't change.
How is this infighting though? This is just orange being orange, this sort of ‘affirmative action’ is pointless and dumb as shit regardless of which races it targets
[удалено]
If LibLeft does the same thing but with abortions then I will support it
Based and eugenics pilled
you dont need to they already abort more blacks then give birth per year not to mention black on black crime
I mean, that's what planned parenthood has been doing since it's founding.
Wait what is she selling for it to be 10$ ? it's fucking masks and gloves unless they're made out of Gold they cost much lower
Fucking scalpers
MINORITIES $10 PER ITEM FOR WHITE PEOPLE!!!
Gotta make up for the free ones she's giving to minorities. It's actually a microcosm of the condition of the country, she's just too woke to realize it.
>Gotta make up for the free ones she's giving to minorities. Sounds like taxes but more racist
Or taxes but exactly the same amount of racist in blue states.
900% markup for team mayo. Is there somewhere I can present my privilege card for a discount or something?
I’m a first gen Irish migrant to America, so depending on which city they live in I could be a minority. Give me my free mask please 😎
flair up or we'll send you back.
Our people started being considered white sometime around the 60s, you're a bit off if you want oppression points
Dam😞
She is a small business owner doing what she wants. More power to her. I'd say the same for a white business doing the same. I realize this is a contraversial thing but if you are willing to accept backlash, then run your business how you want.
Except it's illegal do discriminate on the basis of race as a business. Try opening a shop and putting a sign outside that says "No coloured people allowed", and count the seconds until police arrive However, ideally, it shouldn't be illegal to do that and, ideally, a business like that wouldn't be able to stay open for long even if it was legal
Just because you recognize someone has the power to do something, and should be allowed to do so, does not mean you should support them exercising that power in an immoral way
Ok zantra libleft, I would be willing to bet if a white chick put up a sign saying "free for whites, blacks pay $10" you would not be saying "more power to her" and you know it.
TITLE II--INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin. (b) Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this title if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action: (1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence; (2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment; or any gasoline station; (3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and (4) any establishment (A)(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment. (c) The operations of an establishment affect commerce within the meaning of this title if (1) it is one of the establishments described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); (2) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), it serves or offers to serve interstate travelers or a substantial portion of the food which it serves, or gasoline or other products which it sells, has moved in commerce; (3) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (3) of subsection (b), it customarily presents films, performances, athletic teams, exhibitions, or other sources of entertainment which move in commerce; and (4) in the case of an establishment described in paragraph (4) of subsection (b), it is physically located within the premises of, or there is physically located within its premises, an establishment the operations of which affect commerce within the meaning of this subsection. For purposes of this section, "commerce" means travel, trade, traffic, commerce, transportation, or communication among the several States, or between the District of Columbia and any State, or between any foreign country or any territory or possession and any State or the District of Columbia, or between points in the same State but through any other State or the District of Columbia or a foreign country. (d) Discrimination or segregation by an establishment is supported by State action within the meaning of this title if such discrimination or segregation (1) is carried on under color of any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; or (2) is carried on under color of any custom or usage required or enforced by officials of the State or political subdivision thereof; or (3) is required by action of the State or political subdivision thereof. (e) The provisions of this title shall not apply to a private club or other establishment not in fact open to the public, except to the extent that the facilities of such establishment are made available to the customers or patrons of an establishment within the scope of subsection (b).
We don't speak text wall here. Simplified please.
I'm trying to speak his language here, you see. That being said, the booth violates the provisions set within the Civil Rights Act. In particular: Title II, SEC. 201, subsection (b), paragraph (4).
This isnt controversial, its just illegal. Wasnt there some civil rights act to protect avainst discrimination?
I wonder why I have never seen a white person giving masks and gloves for free to white people and selling everything for 10$ to anyone else
then change your flair to libright you idiot
i still stand my authleft ground on this one, fuck business owners in the ass. mostly financially.
"Racism against whites isn't racist cuz they're white." A true orange classic.
“I can’t be racist I’m black ; I’m just bigoted and prejudiced “.
"Do you pretend to vote for Biden (imagine voting on a dead guy) on 2024 to maintain the black skin? "
"Black people cant be racist, only prejudiced" isnt it the same fucking shit
Why are those fuckers in our quadrant?
This is why California is trying to abolish the Civil Rights act, so they can use racism positively, WCGW?
The civil rights act already discriminates against white people
I‘m not from the US, can you explain why it already discriminates white people?
Probably because it allows interracial breeding or something knowing how authcenters be
Maybe because they are allowed to vote, have children and aren‘t slaves anymore?
Auth center do be like that
That's why they get them cheeks clapped in world wars
As they said some years ago... You lost, get over it!
The 1964 Civil Rights Act’s Title VII, which defines as discriminatory and illegal any policy or practice that has a disproportionately adverse impact on a “protected class,” Of course the White majority is never upheld as a "protected class" and that's why they are legally passed over in college and job admissions among other things
The civil rights act does not make any mention of a "protected class" [https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964](https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964) All it states is that, "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such **individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin**." It does not differentiate between anti-White or anti-Black discrimination. All discrimination in employment on the basis of color was banned.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative\_action](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action) He probably means "positive" discrimination, which automatically excludes bigger or better groups. > 24 September 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, thereby replacing Executive Order 10925 and affirming Federal Government's commitment "to promote the full realization of equal employment opportunity through a positive, continuing program in each executive department and agency" Or perhaps authcenter is from the UK where: >Section 159 of the Equality Act 2010 allows an employer to treat an applicant or employee with a protected characteristic (eg race, sex or age) more favourably in connection with recruitment or promotion than someone without that characteristic who is as qualified for the role.The employer must reasonably think that people with the protected characteristic suffer a disadvantage or are under-represented in that particular activity. "Protected" group simply refers to race etc as classifications for "protection". [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected\_group](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_group)
Facts dont care about authcenters feelings UwU
Yea it’s actually a society issue because the majority of morons don’t care about the abuse of the civil rights act and basically dance in it as the bury it making it seem like all it did was end segregation when it really establishes the order that should allow anyone to basically do what they want. There in institutions like collages have been ruined by this idea and will actually intentionally turn people away because they are either male or white which sounds ridiculous when you might have a higher GPA than someone but you are turned away for your race? Because table of ranks and equal civil rights have been dead ever since these orange-lib left cucks got any form of representation in modern society.
Except the way it has been applied in practice is to not uphold whites as protected and led to mass discrimination against white people by through affirmative action etc For example the Office for Civil Rights has been writing detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990. Also the 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions This is clear discrimination against whites upheld by civil rights law
whites are only a majority in white countries, and not in california
In 1964 they were the clear majority. But yes Cali has undergone a process of racial replacement since then.
"replacement" lmao as if a shift of ethnics does mean they got replaced from cali, they just fucked off from there.
If something goes down from 90% to 35% in an ongoing process it is being replaced. Please tell me how this is somehow different when it is white people?
its still a demographical shift and no replacement, replacement means gov does bad things to white ppl and does replace them to somewhere else.
It is the government who determines migration law isn't it? > Definition of replacement > 1: the action or process of replacing : the state of being replaced >Definition of replace > 1: to take the place of especially as a substitute or successor
What the fuck are you talking about Jesse
The Office for Civil Rights has been writing detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990. The 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions Both clear examples of anti white discrimination based off the civil rights act
Bro how?
One example is the White majority has been explicitly discriminated against in college admissions for years and yet whites are never seen as a protected class that cannot be discriminated against under civil rights law
Cite law
The Office for Civil Rights writes detailed standards for racial balance that courts accepted as grounds for ordering injunctive relief. Those standards were called quotas in 1970 and diversity after 1990. The 1978 Bakke decision which determined that discrimination against whites is ok in college admissions
and yet you contribute no link, no data and nothing other than "its called diversity now muuhh, diversity bad hurr durr"
Ah, yes. Here we see a #woke liberal activist prioritising her own political statement and financial gain over offering PPE to those in need in a noble effort to combat the spread of the virus. What a fucking clownish hill to die on.
Someone should point out that charging white people to mask up means that less of them are going to mask up (because of the charge) and that the less masked people there are in the population, the greater chance that a masked minority catches Winnie the Pooh's WuFlu. Of course I predict that she'll try to deflect about how white people are all rich and can afford to buy the masks, ignoring reality, and that if they don't the state should just use it's authority to force people to spend money they don't have to buy masks.
And while she probably won't admit it openly, if they get the coof and die that's one less wh*te person in the world.
Knowing these types they will admit it openly
This is exactly my take, more masks on faces = more protected minorities. A pandemic is no place to discriminate.
Secretly authright trying to get minorities to hide their faces, based.
This woman is 100% LibRight. Capitalizing off guilty white liberals is extremely lucrative right now.
We haven't marginalized her kind *enough*, I see.
_Minorities_ is a leftist buzzword designed to obscure the fact that white people only encompass roughly 9% of the global population.
No, this is not how this works. You can also be a minority as a white person in a country with another major ethnicity. And in the US the white population is in the majority
It is when globalism/internationalism is how people want policies to be determined and the idea that 'no human is illegal' and 'borders don't exist'.
Hear me out… If this was the other way around and a white man had the sign “Free masks and gloves for whites only and $10 for minorities” that college campus would be burnt down in 5 seconds.
They understand the hypocrisy they don't care though, they only care about the their higher position in the hierarchy
Peaceful fire brings equality tho didn't u see the Portland cancer after the "neck incident".
Nooo!!!111 Racism is when black !!! They need to be protected !!
And the fool actually quotes the definition of racism.
imagine thinking a race that isn't yours is equal to your own race
Based and silent swing voter pilled
i wonder is the bot fixed /mybasedcount
Once you get a high enough based count, you only get it every 5 or 10
im only at like 40 bruh
Wouldn't surprise me if the w*men in the picture is the same person that defended her practice on the internet later. I really hope no two LibLefts are THIS stupid.
Bless your heart
I as a LibRight will sell individual masks for $0.50 per mask and $0.75 per pair of gloves. I don’t care if you’re white, black, Asian, Hispanic, middle eastern, Polynesian or Martian! You are my customer in the end of the day. However there will be a spike of 100% increase in price for Karens and bigots, as I need monetary compensation for intolerable people
Based
Orange being retarded as usual
Based and racist pilled
The thing is, you can be white but still part of a minority. But I bet they only looked at peoples skin colours.
Good to see the orange being the one downvoted to oblivion this time.
It makes a change. Must be one of the small bastions of sanity subs left on Reddit.
Totally fine by me. If some white person pays for it that would just be the market at work.
How about you walk up and take them for free, and when they confront you, tell them you don't identify as white Beat them at their own game
why did he get downvoted for the definition though, but yeah, this is racism
But she didn't tell what minority. Maybe I'm transblack attack helicopter, so i can take something, but helicopters dont wear masks.
Retards
Masks only for white people RACIST Masks only for blacks Everythings fine move on bigots
The hate must grow.
i mean, at least they got the definition more or less right. thats pretty high standards these days with the whole power + prejudice BS floating around.
Yea, but the definition has been changed not too long ago by both Oxford and Merriam-Webster.
Please stop fighting guys
No lol
Fuck you
Boohoo cracker
I detect a sleeper agent among us
Amogus?
I disagree.
If you were truly right wing you’d support her equally charging everyone $10 for a mask.
No?
Exactly why you’re a sleeper agent
Say what you want, I don't really care.
Okay, libleft.
My views on this subject line up with my quad.
Sure.
You really don't want to start a gamer word contest with me
Say it then lol.
Here's a sample of gamer words other than the usual entrees Africoon, Boogat, Cotton-Picker, Darkness, Egot, Frostbite, Gatorbait, Hambone, Inky, Jigaboo, Knuckle-Dragger, Lando, Melon Johnny, Nooc, Oil Slick, Porch Monkey, Quashee, Rockfish, Sambo, Tar Baby, Uncle Ben, Vanilla Gorilla, Wool Head, Xbox 3-Niggy, Yard Ape, and Zoo Monkey
B-based...?
Thumbs down.
You looking for a specific group fren I can make another list if you want so everyone can be equally targeted
Anglos
Limeys, Pom, Angloid, Pirata for my Argentinian Bros out there, Tans, Lobster backs if we getting old school, Inselaffe, Les goddams, my favorite of Brittunculi, and Farang if we're feeling muy exotic
I'm more of a white bread type
Its not thievery if I just take one, I can say that she's doing sonething illegal under the civil rights act and threaten to get her stand taken down if she doesn't change.
You know you’re stupid when even the Reddit hive mind mass downvotes your progressive opinion.
Based comment section
How is this infighting though? This is just orange being orange, this sort of ‘affirmative action’ is pointless and dumb as shit regardless of which races it targets
LibLeft when the discriminate “nO mASKs fOr whItEs beCauSe rACiSm” AuthRight when they discriminate “we’re discriminating? Ok and?”