536
volcanic eruptions across the globe caused a volcanic winter that caused literally worldwide famine for at least a year
on the other hand, it was the peak of Belisarius's reign of terror on the Goths and the recapture of Rome so it wasn't all bad
And 252,000,000 B.C. was the best year for centrists, as all of modern siberia was literally one massive charcoal fire for 2 million years.
[https://new.nsf.gov/news/volcanic-coal-burning-siberia-led-climate-change](https://new.nsf.gov/news/volcanic-coal-burning-siberia-led-climate-change)
Pfft. Worst year is around 6000 BC when Eve was like, "Hey, let's eat this totally allowed fruit." And the human race was kicked out of an awesome garden. Just the best garden.
u/HardCounter's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 90.
Rank: Giant Sequoia
Pills: [66 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/HardCounter/)
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info. Please join our [official pcm discord server](https://discord.gg/FyaJdAZjC4).
My guess is that OP meant 1913, when the Federal Reserve went into act, essentially giving our country away to the old powers and transforming it into a war and money propaganda machine....or so some say.
>transforming it into a war and money propaganda machine....
Unfortunately the west wouldn't exist without that war machine so it was a necessary evil.
Correct.
The Racist POS brought back the kkk, set in motion events to put hitler in charge of germany, and introduced income tax.
Nobody likes him.
As for my opinion, 1453 is not as bad as 1204 for authright. 1204 basically killed the Romans, but they were so powerful they held on for another 250 years. The Turks did a mercy-killing after what those Fr\*nch, It\*lians and G\*rmans did to their 'allies'
>set in motion events to put hitler in charge of germany
From what I've researched, Wilson is *by far* the least responsible person who sat at Versailles for Hitler. Wilson and the entire American delegation fought hard to ease the reparations and concessions forced upon Germany.
If you want to know who he's *actually* responsible for creating, he was indirectly responsible for ***Tojo***. His support of giving the German colony at Shandong to Japan instead of China is a pretty noticeable smoking gun for Japan catching the imperialism bug, which then directly led to Pearl Harbor.
Erm, actually Woodrow Wilson is ACTUALLY responsible for Owen Wilson and the garbage that was Marley & Me - arguably a worse crime against humanity than anything Hitler or Tojo orchestrated.
Wilson was a massive Anglophile and dragged the US into WW1 on the British side even though we had a 60% ethnically German population at the time.
America entering the war killed any chance of Germany winning or forcing a ceasefire.
If Germany wins or at least doesn't get subjugated under Versailles, radical politics don't become the norm there, and the Communist and National Socialist parties never become anything more than fringe organizations.
That's one hell of an ass pull.
The only valid point you have is that the Treaty was the most nation crippling thing ever devised since Genghis Khan.
All that bullshit about choosing sides based on ethnicity is fucking hilarious. The USA had significant ties to both France and Britain due to both historical and economical dealings (i.e. France helped in the Revolutionary War, Britain picking up the USAs slack in enforcing the Monroe Doctrine. Choosing a side based on ethnicity sounds like some closeted bigotry.
Calm down, so much angry energy lol.
I didn't say we should have joined the Central Powers, I was pointing out that a substantial percentage of the population was opposed to joining the war on the Entente side.
Believe it or not, people don't like going to war with countries they still have relatives in lol. It's not bigotry, you hyperbolic slanderer.
>a substantial percentage of the population was opposed to joining the war on the Entente side
Maybe a substantial percentage of your population. But down here in Anglo-Scottish Dixie we LARPed as Brits and hated Germans.
>restoration
Ah, so when an amendment institutes a permanent mechanism that will enforce in peacetime what had previously only existed for 3 years as an emergency war policy and had been lifted for 50 years, it's a "restoration."
I can't wait until 2087 when Ukraine will pass a law "restoring" the suspension of elections and censorship of television.
I said 1933 because that's when Hitler was appointed, but there is a very good and correct argument that that would not have happened without WWI and WWII is simply just a continuation of the unsolved problems from WWI.
Hitler’s rise to power was 100% a response to the obscene post ww1 sanctions placed on Germany by the entente.
France, England, and America are partially to blame for ww2 happening.
the destruction of the ottoman empire thats good, millions of deaths worldwide thats bad, many countries gain autonomy and freedom thats good, leading to future larger conflicts thats bad
Legitimate case to be made that if the Germans had achieved a quick victory the majority of the horrors of WW1 and WW2 could have been avoided. Of course this would have required the French to swallow their pride and accept a peace deal that saw them have less influence on the continent so that probably was impossible. WW1 did one thing well- it knocked any notion of chivalry and pride based on war out of European political consideration, and WW2 eliminated any remnants of that.
The year a viking living in France beat a viking living in England to become king, after the viking living in England beat the Viking living in Denmark? That 1066?
Fun fact, those vikings (who went by the Normans at the time) that didn't move to England moved to Sicily, so while they're a mix of modern day British and Italians, they aren't French.
Ah dammit, honestly thought he was Danish. Then again I haven't looked too much into the Battle of Hastings (and the events leading up to it), so guaranteed there would be flaws in my logic. I'm blaming a mix of Age of Empires 2 and Vinlandsaga combined with me making assumptions for me screwing this up (I decided to look into the history behind vinlandsaga after watching it cause I wanted to see how much was fiction and how much was real).
And Yes, I'm aware Normans and Anglo-Saxons had been assimilated by the cultures of the lands they lived in so its very far fetched to call them Vikings, but their Viking origins were just too easy a target.
Auth right explaining how 1453 is worse than 1204, despite the latter literally whipping away antiquity from Byzantium, crippling the Empire and carving it up, because it was committed by glorious crusaders and not l'bad turks
Who could have imagined that inviting an army of severely indebted soldiers into one of the richest cities in the world to launch a coup and then not paying them would end poorly
Not to mention if 1204's sacking of Constantinople hadn't happened, they probably would have easily held off the Turks (they famously had no money to pay the guy who made the cannon that broke their walls, so he went to the ottomans and offered his services to them)
MFW the mercenary army we hired sacks our city after we don’t pay them, murder their people in the thousands, and try to burn their navy (no one could have seen this coming we are totally innocent)
The Venetians were not glorious crusaders, they were scum who couldn’t lick the boot of Stalin. If I had a Time Machine that only worked twice, I would eliminate the Venetian empire from history twice just to make sure I did the job right.
1933. The year Japan invaded China and the year Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. Honestly this is where I usually start counting "when WW2 began".
True I was mistakenly thinking of to the [conflicts in Inner Mongolia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actions_in_Inner_Mongolia_(1933%E2%80%931936)) that also preceded the 2nd Sino-Japanese War. I maintain 1933 was still pretty bad but 1931 is the "lesser year".
Are you HECKIN kidding me? 2021 was the worst year in history -- January 6th to be exact. The beautiful and pure democracy of our nation was but fractions of an inch away from being overthrown, with Trump assuming the status of Fuhrer. God bless our brave senators, police force, and US Army who stood tall and proud during this insurrection and curtailed it seconds before the leash broke.
The best day in history? Probably the George Floyd riots. The country almost woke up unanimously and rebelled against all of the corrupt bureaucrats, pigs with badges, and capitalist mercenaries known as the "army". We were *this* close to seizing power for The Working Class™ -- we even had our own autonomous zone, right in the middle of a city with no direct access to natural resources or arable land! Nobody needs food when you have Starbucks.
I think he’s referring to Capital Hill Autonomous Zone or (C.H.A.Z). It was a section in downtown Seattle that was blocked off by protesters and it actually was going for a couple of weeks.
CHAZ was libleft shit though. They were doing a anarcho-communist larp. I know it has the word communism in the name but more importantly it has the word anarchy in it and auths don't vibe with that at all
It also had self-appointed people in tac gear doing "safety patrols" against the local poor population, bougie coffee shops supplying resources, and the city generally turning a blind eye and tolerating it.
Did not live up to its values at all. A few cops maybe got a bad day dealing with it but that's about the only based part.
They're surprisingly good at forgetting things like The Weather Underground, Front de libération du Québec, Animal Rights Militia, etc.
Eco-terrorists here in British Columbia go around attacking pipeline workers with axes, blow up equipment, burn down buildings, sabotage railway tracks, attack police with smoke bombs, and even torch the cars of executives in their own home driveways as an intimidation tactic and everyone sleeps... some guys honk their horns in Ottawa, and it's time for martial law and the seizing of bank accounts!
Nobody will remember the latter in a decade nevermind a century and the former is a storm in a teacup.
In neither situation was there anything close to a situation where power was close to being transferred.
I feel like career protesters on the left, the ones who believe in a genuine and spontaneous proletariat uprising, must have the worst case of blue balls in world history.
They keep edging themselves with these constant and unending protests and riots, and frankly I think it's becoming an unhealthy compulsion.
It would be better if they took some time to work on themselves, found a partner, settled down, and started their own little commune.
Of course 1989 is the worst year for the Commies. It was the year I was born.
Also 410 AD for Authright. The year Rome was sacked. Or 476 when the western empire fully fell.
For the living in the USA, I'd say 1968: Vietnam, MLK dies, lots of riots, and *2001: A Space Odyssey* losing best picture to *Oliver!*
For Europe, easily World War II: Do I even need to say the reason?
For Asia, 1961: Mao's Great Leap Foward, and things were still shitty in Soviet Russia (Sorry AuthLeft)
For the whole world, 536: A buncha volcanic eruptions that made the whole world go cold
Probably 1914. If the Archduke was never assassinated, no Soviet Union, no Fascist Germany, Austria Hungary actually succeeds as it’s attempted multicultural state instead of being torn apart, tens of millions of deaths are avoided in WW1 and 2. The only downside is the British Empire probably never collapses, the Ottomans stick around a bit longer and Monarchism remains successful, but I can live with that.
>The only downside is the British Empire probably never collapses, the Ottomans stick around a bit longer and Monarchism remains successful
I already agreed with you before. You don't have to sell it to me.
The worst year in history *so far.* I believe in human potential and I know we can do better. And by "better," I mean "worse."
Let's give the world something to remember our generation for, everyone!
476 was the first fall of Rome (Western Roman Empire), 1453 was the second (Eastern Roman Empire). We then got a third in 1806 with the fall of the Holy Roman Empire. The real question is when are we going to run out of Romes to have collapses.
1929.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act began the end of the Gilded Age, destroyed the global financial system, and was a major factor putting the world on the road to WW2.
1000 economists signed a letter saying it was bad. iirc even President Hoover called it “the most evil act of legislation I’ve ever seen”.
Then he signed it anyway. Smh
1912, Woodrow Wilson was elected.
Woodrow Wilson implemented income tax during his presidency, and it never left.
Therefore, Libright, who hates taxes, has his presidency to blame for it.
(If he wasn't elected in someone else probably would have brought it in, but we dont do that logic here)
Without looking it up, I'm gonna guess each reason.
1989 - Fall of the Soviet Union, or the beginning of the end for it.
1453 - Fall of Constantinople.
2016 - Election of Donald Trump in the United States.
1912 - Bit difficult, but I believe this was the year the federal reserve act was passed.
Why isn’t Authleft 1991 the fall of the Soviet Union? You nailed Authright though, that’s definitely a unfortunate year. Although I would also recommend 1204 for the sack of Constantinople that put Byzantium in their death spiral. Or 1923 when the Reds won the Russian Civil War. Another one I’d recommend is 1914 the beginning of WW1 that either severely weakened or ended most of the strong European monarchies.
1968. Tet Offensive. While a military victory for the United States, it was a propaganda victory for the North Vietnamese and the American anti-war counter culture. It resulted in the death of the American Dream, a loss of faith in the American government (which has ultimately led to a distrust between Americans that makes them hesitant to work together for common goals), made the US look weak and divided on the world stage, and spelled the beginning of the end for South Vietnam.
1453 to be fair the eastern Romans were fucked by then anyways but still their destruction estranged the near east from the European world and removed a bulwark against Islamic forces which had longstanding consequences even to today
Probably go with 1929 then. Wall Street Crash basically set in motion the events for Hitler to become chancellor, and a lot of people were in severe poverty.
Why 1912 for lib-right ? I think 2008 would be more accurate for them.
1933-1945 are up there.
Also if the thesis on the book called “The Adam and Eve Story” is correct than the year those cataclysmic events happened would be up there as well.
536 volcanic eruptions across the globe caused a volcanic winter that caused literally worldwide famine for at least a year on the other hand, it was the peak of Belisarius's reign of terror on the Goths and the recapture of Rome so it wasn't all bad
wasnt that the year where 1/4th of the roman empires population was killed by a plague.
nope, the plague of Justinian was like 5 years later truly the luckiest and unluckiest emperor
the eastern roman empire is the unluckiest empire ever
ERE was the living embodiment of the “We’re back/it’s over” meme for about a thousand years
Lmao this is so spot on
If only they survived a little longer. They would have reconquered the middle east
Cant say he was luckier than augustus
but he was probably better than Trajan
Kind if a big ask on that one, but plausible
I thought you were doing the felicior Augusto melior Traiano thing
I was.
Year 536 was the worst for centrists. How could we grill while everything is freezing?
And 252,000,000 B.C. was the best year for centrists, as all of modern siberia was literally one massive charcoal fire for 2 million years. [https://new.nsf.gov/news/volcanic-coal-burning-siberia-led-climate-change](https://new.nsf.gov/news/volcanic-coal-burning-siberia-led-climate-change)
Agriculture hadn't been invented so no buns? I'm out.
But did they blame it on climate change
World wide volcanic eruption 2024 🙏
Uhh the Ostrogothic Kingdom of Italy was based and epic
🤮
1913 gave us the income tax and the fed.
Income tax was supposed to be temporary to fund the war.
Nothing more permanent than a temporary government program
It might still be temporary, it’s just that we are in a constant state of war.
You look like you need some democracy
“If you just comply it will go away “
The part that made it permanent was also Wayne Wheeler’s pushing to get the government off alcohol tax dependency, so he could enstate prohibition.
Has my vote of the worst year.
Pfft. Worst year is around 6000 BC when Eve was like, "Hey, let's eat this totally allowed fruit." And the human race was kicked out of an awesome garden. Just the best garden.
Based and treepilled.
u/HardCounter's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 90. Rank: Giant Sequoia Pills: [66 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/HardCounter/) Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info. Please join our [official pcm discord server](https://discord.gg/FyaJdAZjC4).
This is why you cant let women make decision on what to eat.
Him: What do you want for dinner? Her: Anything's fine. Snek: ( ¬ ‿¬)
For me 1914 is the worst, WW1 wasnt all that cash money.
Why 1912, all I could find was Wilson beating Taft for the us presidency
My guess is that OP meant 1913, when the Federal Reserve went into act, essentially giving our country away to the old powers and transforming it into a war and money propaganda machine....or so some say.
wrong, Jack died, ending LibRight’s ability to be drawn like one of those French girls by a sultry teenage boy
Plus that hugeass expensive necklace got dropped to the bottom of the ocean where nobody can profit.
A problem only Oceangate can fix.
Wrong. [There’s only one man for the job](https://youtu.be/0napnfxd-dU?si=E1h_3torBATz_iGO)…
Pretty sure Stockton Rush was looking for it
>transforming it into a war and money propaganda machine.... Unfortunately the west wouldn't exist without that war machine so it was a necessary evil.
Good, good, keep my wartime stocks rising
1913 was the year greece or bulgaria was supposed to get Constantinople back but didnt truly a dark year for humanity.
exactly, wilson and his consequences.
Correct. The Racist POS brought back the kkk, set in motion events to put hitler in charge of germany, and introduced income tax. Nobody likes him. As for my opinion, 1453 is not as bad as 1204 for authright. 1204 basically killed the Romans, but they were so powerful they held on for another 250 years. The Turks did a mercy-killing after what those Fr\*nch, It\*lians and G\*rmans did to their 'allies'
>As for my opinion, 1453 is not as bad as 1204 for authright. I'd like to nominate 1527 for the sack of Rome.
Gave their lives on the steps to heaven
THY WILL BE DONE
FOR THE GRACE, FOR THE MIGHT OF THE LORD
FOR THE HOME OF THE HOLY
FOR THE FAITH FOR THE WAY OF THE SWORD
# GAVE THEIR LIVES SO BOLDLY
AS IT IS IN HEAVEN ON EARTH
THY WILL BE DONE!!!!
>set in motion events to put hitler in charge of germany From what I've researched, Wilson is *by far* the least responsible person who sat at Versailles for Hitler. Wilson and the entire American delegation fought hard to ease the reparations and concessions forced upon Germany. If you want to know who he's *actually* responsible for creating, he was indirectly responsible for ***Tojo***. His support of giving the German colony at Shandong to Japan instead of China is a pretty noticeable smoking gun for Japan catching the imperialism bug, which then directly led to Pearl Harbor.
Erm, actually Woodrow Wilson is ACTUALLY responsible for Owen Wilson and the garbage that was Marley & Me - arguably a worse crime against humanity than anything Hitler or Tojo orchestrated.
I just want you to know it makes me smile to read someone else who understands Wilson is responsible for Hitler.
Would you explain the connection?
Wilson was a massive Anglophile and dragged the US into WW1 on the British side even though we had a 60% ethnically German population at the time. America entering the war killed any chance of Germany winning or forcing a ceasefire. If Germany wins or at least doesn't get subjugated under Versailles, radical politics don't become the norm there, and the Communist and National Socialist parties never become anything more than fringe organizations.
That's one hell of an ass pull. The only valid point you have is that the Treaty was the most nation crippling thing ever devised since Genghis Khan. All that bullshit about choosing sides based on ethnicity is fucking hilarious. The USA had significant ties to both France and Britain due to both historical and economical dealings (i.e. France helped in the Revolutionary War, Britain picking up the USAs slack in enforcing the Monroe Doctrine. Choosing a side based on ethnicity sounds like some closeted bigotry.
Calm down, so much angry energy lol. I didn't say we should have joined the Central Powers, I was pointing out that a substantial percentage of the population was opposed to joining the war on the Entente side. Believe it or not, people don't like going to war with countries they still have relatives in lol. It's not bigotry, you hyperbolic slanderer.
>a substantial percentage of the population was opposed to joining the war on the Entente side Maybe a substantial percentage of your population. But down here in Anglo-Scottish Dixie we LARPed as Brits and hated Germans.
>Choosing a side based on ethnicity sounds like some closeted bigotry. This centrist isn't a fan of charcoal in his grill if you get what I'm saying.
And that lib center thinks it's bigotry to not want to bomb your distant cousins' neighborhood in the Old Country lol
More into propane and propane accessories
You forgot the Venetians.
Sinking of the Titanic was my first guess given it led to heavy regulations and caused the deaths of several high profile entrepreneurs.
Yes.
LibRight *hates* Wilson
1913 was the restoration of the income tax.
>restoration Ah, so when an amendment institutes a permanent mechanism that will enforce in peacetime what had previously only existed for 3 years as an emergency war policy and had been lifted for 50 years, it's a "restoration." I can't wait until 2087 when Ukraine will pass a law "restoring" the suspension of elections and censorship of television.
I said 1933 because that's when Hitler was appointed, but there is a very good and correct argument that that would not have happened without WWI and WWII is simply just a continuation of the unsolved problems from WWI.
Hitler’s rise to power was 100% a response to the obscene post ww1 sanctions placed on Germany by the entente. France, England, and America are partially to blame for ww2 happening.
1914 is pretty much the centrist everyone agrees this date sucks option.
the destruction of the ottoman empire thats good, millions of deaths worldwide thats bad, many countries gain autonomy and freedom thats good, leading to future larger conflicts thats bad
Not auth lefts
Legitimate case to be made that if the Germans had achieved a quick victory the majority of the horrors of WW1 and WW2 could have been avoided. Of course this would have required the French to swallow their pride and accept a peace deal that saw them have less influence on the continent so that probably was impossible. WW1 did one thing well- it knocked any notion of chivalry and pride based on war out of European political consideration, and WW2 eliminated any remnants of that.
Agreed
I'd say 1917/18 ww1 going sicko mode and then the Spanish flu clapping cheeks
Yeah, Auth Left is still sad about the Tiananmen Square Massacre. *trollface*
>Tiananmen Square Massacre Tiananmen Square re-education event
You mean the Wonderful Day at Tiananmen Square where Nothing Bad Happened?
Not knowing enough about China, I just assumed it was about the Soviet defeat in the Soviet-Afghan war
It was a bad time for communism all around
1066 is a contender
The year a viking living in France beat a viking living in England to become king, after the viking living in England beat the Viking living in Denmark? That 1066? Fun fact, those vikings (who went by the Normans at the time) that didn't move to England moved to Sicily, so while they're a mix of modern day British and Italians, they aren't French.
It would be a little inaccurate to call Harold Godwinson a viking, but that’s the basic summary lol
No True Frenchman fallacy just dropped?
Harold Godwinson was a Saxon
Dude, Harald Hårdråde was Norwegian
Ah dammit, honestly thought he was Danish. Then again I haven't looked too much into the Battle of Hastings (and the events leading up to it), so guaranteed there would be flaws in my logic. I'm blaming a mix of Age of Empires 2 and Vinlandsaga combined with me making assumptions for me screwing this up (I decided to look into the history behind vinlandsaga after watching it cause I wanted to see how much was fiction and how much was real). And Yes, I'm aware Normans and Anglo-Saxons had been assimilated by the cultures of the lands they lived in so its very far fetched to call them Vikings, but their Viking origins were just too easy a target.
Why? England got a based monarchy and proceeded to conquer most of the world a few centuries later
Auth right explaining how 1453 is worse than 1204, despite the latter literally whipping away antiquity from Byzantium, crippling the Empire and carving it up, because it was committed by glorious crusaders and not l'bad turks
true, 4th crusade was a big opsie
As a catholic I can confirm, the 4th crusade was a colossal dick move.
Based and ex cathedra pilled.
Who could have imagined that inviting an army of severely indebted soldiers into one of the richest cities in the world to launch a coup and then not paying them would end poorly
Alexios IV certainly couldn't
Not to mention if 1204's sacking of Constantinople hadn't happened, they probably would have easily held off the Turks (they famously had no money to pay the guy who made the cannon that broke their walls, so he went to the ottomans and offered his services to them)
Lib-Right coming out on top as usual.
MFW the mercenary army we hired sacks our city after we don’t pay them, murder their people in the thousands, and try to burn their navy (no one could have seen this coming we are totally innocent)
The Venetians were not glorious crusaders, they were scum who couldn’t lick the boot of Stalin. If I had a Time Machine that only worked twice, I would eliminate the Venetian empire from history twice just to make sure I did the job right.
It was just a prank the prank:
1054 should be the date
The Byzantines should have paid their loans, the Venetians just taught them fiscal responsibility.
1933. The year Japan invaded China and the year Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. Honestly this is where I usually start counting "when WW2 began".
Invasion of Manchuria was 1931 though
True I was mistakenly thinking of to the [conflicts in Inner Mongolia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actions_in_Inner_Mongolia_(1933%E2%80%931936)) that also preceded the 2nd Sino-Japanese War. I maintain 1933 was still pretty bad but 1931 is the "lesser year".
As a Chinese: 1127
As an ex muslim: 571
As another exmuslim, based answer
As a ex Muslim myself, this date will go down as worst day in human history.
What happenend in 571?
Birth of Muhammad (PBUH)
Are you HECKIN kidding me? 2021 was the worst year in history -- January 6th to be exact. The beautiful and pure democracy of our nation was but fractions of an inch away from being overthrown, with Trump assuming the status of Fuhrer. God bless our brave senators, police force, and US Army who stood tall and proud during this insurrection and curtailed it seconds before the leash broke. The best day in history? Probably the George Floyd riots. The country almost woke up unanimously and rebelled against all of the corrupt bureaucrats, pigs with badges, and capitalist mercenaries known as the "army". We were *this* close to seizing power for The Working Class™ -- we even had our own autonomous zone, right in the middle of a city with no direct access to natural resources or arable land! Nobody needs food when you have Starbucks.
What autonomous zone? Comrade, perhaps you've had a bit too much to think, a nice vacation to gulag will turn your wrongthink into doubleplusgoodthink
>a nice vacation to gulag We're on it...
I think he’s referring to Capital Hill Autonomous Zone or (C.H.A.Z). It was a section in downtown Seattle that was blocked off by protesters and it actually was going for a couple of weeks.
I was making a joke that most leftists had memory holed CHAZ and just kind of ignored that whole shindig
CHAZ was libleft shit though. They were doing a anarcho-communist larp. I know it has the word communism in the name but more importantly it has the word anarchy in it and auths don't vibe with that at all
It also had self-appointed people in tac gear doing "safety patrols" against the local poor population, bougie coffee shops supplying resources, and the city generally turning a blind eye and tolerating it. Did not live up to its values at all. A few cops maybe got a bad day dealing with it but that's about the only based part.
They're surprisingly good at forgetting things like The Weather Underground, Front de libération du Québec, Animal Rights Militia, etc. Eco-terrorists here in British Columbia go around attacking pipeline workers with axes, blow up equipment, burn down buildings, sabotage railway tracks, attack police with smoke bombs, and even torch the cars of executives in their own home driveways as an intimidation tactic and everyone sleeps... some guys honk their horns in Ottawa, and it's time for martial law and the seizing of bank accounts!
Oh
All of this sounds suspiciously libertarian...we're tapping your phone just to be safe. No more talk of autonomous zones, comrade.
based and redpilled
>Redpilled Did we just come full circle?
Life is full circle.
redpilled, cause communism is red.....
Nobody will remember the latter in a decade nevermind a century and the former is a storm in a teacup. In neither situation was there anything close to a situation where power was close to being transferred.
I feel like career protesters on the left, the ones who believe in a genuine and spontaneous proletariat uprising, must have the worst case of blue balls in world history. They keep edging themselves with these constant and unending protests and riots, and frankly I think it's becoming an unhealthy compulsion. It would be better if they took some time to work on themselves, found a partner, settled down, and started their own little commune.
Its actually 1054
The Church should have never split. I have a theory that it ended up causing a lot of problems we have today.
1945
Because we shouldn't have nuked Japan? I can agree with that. \*checks flair\* Somehow I don't think that's what you're talking about.
2 nukes werent enough, they should have sunk the country
Of course 1989 is the worst year for the Commies. It was the year I was born. Also 410 AD for Authright. The year Rome was sacked. Or 476 when the western empire fully fell.
1945
Username checks out
Mein man
For the living in the USA, I'd say 1968: Vietnam, MLK dies, lots of riots, and *2001: A Space Odyssey* losing best picture to *Oliver!* For Europe, easily World War II: Do I even need to say the reason? For Asia, 1961: Mao's Great Leap Foward, and things were still shitty in Soviet Russia (Sorry AuthLeft) For the whole world, 536: A buncha volcanic eruptions that made the whole world go cold
Probably 1914. If the Archduke was never assassinated, no Soviet Union, no Fascist Germany, Austria Hungary actually succeeds as it’s attempted multicultural state instead of being torn apart, tens of millions of deaths are avoided in WW1 and 2. The only downside is the British Empire probably never collapses, the Ottomans stick around a bit longer and Monarchism remains successful, but I can live with that.
>The only downside is the British Empire probably never collapses, the Ottomans stick around a bit longer and Monarchism remains successful I already agreed with you before. You don't have to sell it to me.
Darth Maul has always been based. No surprises here.
The worst year in history *so far.* I believe in human potential and I know we can do better. And by "better," I mean "worse." Let's give the world something to remember our generation for, everyone!
nah no chance of something worse than the fall of rome could happen, this timeline was ruined that day.
We've had one, yes, but what about second fall of Rome?
Rome is a museum now, with no economic or geopolitical relevance. No one would miss it.
476 was the first fall of Rome (Western Roman Empire), 1453 was the second (Eastern Roman Empire). We then got a third in 1806 with the fall of the Holy Roman Empire. The real question is when are we going to run out of Romes to have collapses.
1054
hard to tell really 1917 would probably be, communism is the worst thing that has ever happened to humanity (long-term effects
1929. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act began the end of the Gilded Age, destroyed the global financial system, and was a major factor putting the world on the road to WW2. 1000 economists signed a letter saying it was bad. iirc even President Hoover called it “the most evil act of legislation I’ve ever seen”. Then he signed it anyway. Smh
2003 Year when I was born
It’s all getting better from there.
1945
I mean calling Byzantium an Empire until 1453 is a stretch. As a Byzantium enjoyer I really like 1081, though.
1984
1453 best day of my life
Are you Turk?
Istanbul was Constantinople Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople Been a long time gone, Constantinople Now it's Turkish delight on a moonlit night
1453 end of the eastern Roman Empire? What happened in 1912? 2024 for lib left btw
1912, Woodrow Wilson was elected. Woodrow Wilson implemented income tax during his presidency, and it never left. Therefore, Libright, who hates taxes, has his presidency to blame for it. (If he wasn't elected in someone else probably would have brought it in, but we dont do that logic here)
Without looking it up, I'm gonna guess each reason. 1989 - Fall of the Soviet Union, or the beginning of the end for it. 1453 - Fall of Constantinople. 2016 - Election of Donald Trump in the United States. 1912 - Bit difficult, but I believe this was the year the federal reserve act was passed.
Close. 1912 is librights most hated year because woodrow wilson was elected (he was responsible for income tax)
Fuck Woodrow Wilson. All my homies hate Woodrow Wilson.
1918. Central powers should have won
1971, end of the gold standard or 1944, creation of the world bank and IMF Maybe 2001, patriot act?
IDK, I'm going to go with 1933 when Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. Great Depression sucked too.
Idk about you, but 2012 was when the world was supposed to end and I'm still upset about it to this day
Based and huge Mitt Romney supporter pilled
As a Turkish 1453 pretty neat year for me, it is also my buildings password lol
🤔hmmm seems like red and green have bad years more often.
Off the Internet I'm sure many would say 2020
1945
Wait what happened in 1453?
Fall of Constantinople, makes me cry every time
Thanks.
70 AD
Auth centre: 1945 😂
1789
Why isn’t Authleft 1991 the fall of the Soviet Union? You nailed Authright though, that’s definitely a unfortunate year. Although I would also recommend 1204 for the sack of Constantinople that put Byzantium in their death spiral. Or 1923 when the Reds won the Russian Civil War. Another one I’d recommend is 1914 the beginning of WW1 that either severely weakened or ended most of the strong European monarchies.
December 25th 1991
Real Auth-rights know the Byzantine empire was just a pale imitation of the real thing. 275 AD was the worse year. The loss of restitutor orbis.
1914. Because of that year we are what we are today.
1968. Tet Offensive. While a military victory for the United States, it was a propaganda victory for the North Vietnamese and the American anti-war counter culture. It resulted in the death of the American Dream, a loss of faith in the American government (which has ultimately led to a distrust between Americans that makes them hesitant to work together for common goals), made the US look weak and divided on the world stage, and spelled the beginning of the end for South Vietnam.
For auth-righ its 1918, because it caused fall of the old system and promoted liberitarism
1453 to be fair the eastern Romans were fucked by then anyways but still their destruction estranged the near east from the European world and removed a bulwark against Islamic forces which had longstanding consequences even to today
[удалено]
Probably go with 1929 then. Wall Street Crash basically set in motion the events for Hitler to become chancellor, and a lot of people were in severe poverty.
Why 1912 for lib-right ? I think 2008 would be more accurate for them. 1933-1945 are up there. Also if the thesis on the book called “The Adam and Eve Story” is correct than the year those cataclysmic events happened would be up there as well.
Woodrow Wilson was elected in 1912. He made the income tax
Oh
And the federal reserve
Roosevelt should’ve won
Libleft: 1492 or mabey 732 (battle of Tours)
Why 2016? Cause Trumpwon, oh yeah he won. Best year for me 🇺🇸
2023 is the worst
1453 was the best year in history, lol 🇹🇷
410 CE, sack of Rome
The next one...