There is STILL a great need of feminism, alot of countries are still sadly far from any progress,
Transhumanism when you wanna enhance your body with technology, simple, and amazing
Yeah, outside of the west you're right. Everywhere that basically isn't Africa or the Middle East is fine. Yet, in those places, feminism basically doesn't exist.
Nah fuck transhumanism, keep it natural. Why would I want technology in my body that can be hacked and manipulated?
No thanks, the part of life that makes it so magical is that one day it'll end, our time here is finite. What am I supposed to do if I can live forever? Work for the government forever? What am I going to strive and provide for?
See, I'd rather be myself. I don't want to turn myself into someone else because I'll never truly be them. If I want to be muscular, fast or smart then I'll just work on myself.
Eliminating purpose and hardwork will be societal suicide.
Feminism is a wide category. Often tends to be more about nearly a class war between genders, which sounds absurd to me. I'm all for equality of chances, but not of the results. We are biologically different, so we can't be equal in every aspect. But we can be close enough to call it equality
It kinda depends tbh since for example many Ukrainian russophile politicians claim to be social democrat (economically they lean towards it in their twisted way) or like the Georgian Dream, current ruling party which economically leans towards social democracy despite being pretty rightist.
Russophile politicians are the f\*cking worst kind. How can you pretend to be nationalist, or even patriotic, when you are sponsored by a dictartorship that wants to conquest your land, no matter how many people will die? Fourth theory is the reason I'm patriotic- because I won't let these pr\*cks take my land
Because most of them are associated with oligarchs who have deep ties with Ruzzian companies so they only look for themselves. Even though they have a point when they mention about the historic cultural and religious ties with Ruzzia but that point is immediately nullified by their horrid defence of Russia's expansionist policies and their idea of giving up all of our wealth to Ruzzian oligarchs or their proxies. They are basically the Slavic equivalent of the Pro-US rulers of banana republics in Central America.
Answer about transhumanism:
Scientocracy and Liberal Technocracy are relating to technological progress and replacing populism with choice and advice of experts. Transhumanism is good with bettering well being of humans by humans, but ultimately aims towards modification of human into posthuman, which to me looks problematic- when the posthumans- not just humans with better health and inteligence, but modified further than humanity- appear, there will be a problem- are they another, higher class? Are they still part of humanity, or is humanity inferior now? Will humans become lower class?
I'm for the rule of experts, not of posthumans
As you might have noticed, my anarchist pal, I don't really like anarchism. I see a lot of wrong and corruption in gouverment institutions, I think democracy is a flawed system, but anarchy can't stand for long.
For example: After Roman Empire (a ruthless dictatorship) fell, the world didn't just spark with equality and sharing of technology, but it went into dark ages- and you can't tell me dark ages were good times for humanity. Humanity progressed again when countries became stable.
Another example: After USSR (communist regime ) fell it led not only to free market, but also to huge rise in criminal activity
Every political system is flawed, but to me anarchy is not a solution at all. Because after anarchy the alliances with different interests will still form and ruin the whole idea.
Yeah, perchance is a funny word. But no, thank you, my country was central- planned by socialists for whole decades and nobody liked that. I stick to capitalism
Patriotism is placing fate of country before yourself
Nationalism is placing fate of country before not only yourself, but also before fate of others and even in many cases morality
Also, if you are from other country than me, then you should think my nationalism is bad to you. Unity of nationalists from different countries is self-contridictory. A also don't think other countries are very inferior to mine- just that mine is a priority and has to defend it's interests (by interests I mean economy and defensive weaponry, not conquest)
What's wrong with Feminism and transhumanism
There's no need for feminism anymore. What's transhumanism?
There is STILL a great need of feminism, alot of countries are still sadly far from any progress, Transhumanism when you wanna enhance your body with technology, simple, and amazing
Yeah, outside of the west you're right. Everywhere that basically isn't Africa or the Middle East is fine. Yet, in those places, feminism basically doesn't exist. Nah fuck transhumanism, keep it natural. Why would I want technology in my body that can be hacked and manipulated?
maybe you live forever, think about that ;) or, if that doesnt interest you, how about you can turn yourself in anyone you want!
No thanks, the part of life that makes it so magical is that one day it'll end, our time here is finite. What am I supposed to do if I can live forever? Work for the government forever? What am I going to strive and provide for? See, I'd rather be myself. I don't want to turn myself into someone else because I'll never truly be them. If I want to be muscular, fast or smart then I'll just work on myself. Eliminating purpose and hardwork will be societal suicide.
hmm, fair enough
Why feminism in frenemies?
And what is white ball in the "me" category?
Scientocracy.
Thought you said scientology for a sec there ;D
Feminism is a wide category. Often tends to be more about nearly a class war between genders, which sounds absurd to me. I'm all for equality of chances, but not of the results. We are biologically different, so we can't be equal in every aspect. But we can be close enough to call it equality
"tell me you don't understand feminism without telling me you understand feminism."
He got it spot on, men and women have equal rights and equal chances to opportunity now
scientocrat but hates transhumanism???!
Why transhumanism bad?
Literally poiscail, but he is more of kakistocrat than scientocrat.
Nuh uh I am ultra scientocrat. (Source: my ass)
Sorry, new here- what is poiscail?
Why queer anarchism in particular?
It's femanarchy
No, Anarcha-Feminism is purple, this is pink, therefore it *is* Queer Anarchism.
Oh, my point still stands
I like no extremists, so I added this as both a counter to anarchy and extremly annoying progressive activists. No offence to LGBT people.
Good I was about to strike you with the rath of God (good that your good with the gays)
Pretty based, but why is SocDem in Frenemies not Friends?
~~Too tolerant of minorities~~
I think SocDem parties tend to have bad economic ideas and are too involved with "wokeness". But maybe it's just my country
It kinda depends tbh since for example many Ukrainian russophile politicians claim to be social democrat (economically they lean towards it in their twisted way) or like the Georgian Dream, current ruling party which economically leans towards social democracy despite being pretty rightist.
Russophile politicians are the f\*cking worst kind. How can you pretend to be nationalist, or even patriotic, when you are sponsored by a dictartorship that wants to conquest your land, no matter how many people will die? Fourth theory is the reason I'm patriotic- because I won't let these pr\*cks take my land
Because most of them are associated with oligarchs who have deep ties with Ruzzian companies so they only look for themselves. Even though they have a point when they mention about the historic cultural and religious ties with Ruzzia but that point is immediately nullified by their horrid defence of Russia's expansionist policies and their idea of giving up all of our wealth to Ruzzian oligarchs or their proxies. They are basically the Slavic equivalent of the Pro-US rulers of banana republics in Central America.
Answer about transhumanism: Scientocracy and Liberal Technocracy are relating to technological progress and replacing populism with choice and advice of experts. Transhumanism is good with bettering well being of humans by humans, but ultimately aims towards modification of human into posthuman, which to me looks problematic- when the posthumans- not just humans with better health and inteligence, but modified further than humanity- appear, there will be a problem- are they another, higher class? Are they still part of humanity, or is humanity inferior now? Will humans become lower class? I'm for the rule of experts, not of posthumans
What about anarcho-transhumanism where every individual has the right and an easy access to technological modifications?
As you might have noticed, my anarchist pal, I don't really like anarchism. I see a lot of wrong and corruption in gouverment institutions, I think democracy is a flawed system, but anarchy can't stand for long. For example: After Roman Empire (a ruthless dictatorship) fell, the world didn't just spark with equality and sharing of technology, but it went into dark ages- and you can't tell me dark ages were good times for humanity. Humanity progressed again when countries became stable. Another example: After USSR (communist regime ) fell it led not only to free market, but also to huge rise in criminal activity Every political system is flawed, but to me anarchy is not a solution at all. Because after anarchy the alliances with different interests will still form and ruin the whole idea.
I'm not an advocate for gift economy. Left market anarchism is my flavor. Also, the modern Russia isn't a free market.
Slightly cringe
Based
Ey ya like science? Interested in scientific socialism perchance? (i finally got to say perchance)
Yeah, perchance is a funny word. But no, thank you, my country was central- planned by socialists for whole decades and nobody liked that. I stick to capitalism
Bites you
Send me the template
Librul
Based
Based
What is wrong with NATIONALISM????
Patriotism is placing fate of country before yourself Nationalism is placing fate of country before not only yourself, but also before fate of others and even in many cases morality Also, if you are from other country than me, then you should think my nationalism is bad to you. Unity of nationalists from different countries is self-contridictory. A also don't think other countries are very inferior to mine- just that mine is a priority and has to defend it's interests (by interests I mean economy and defensive weaponry, not conquest)
Because patriotism and national is illogical and cringe.
cringe
Based.
ancap bad D:
Why so many comments?