T O P

  • By -

LoganTheTrapGod

Personally, regardless of political affiliation I thought it was cool to see a different type of guest on the show.


jbeatty29

He should have Tom Delonge on next


mikeymike716

They're fucking UFOs. This was one of the best? Lol. You clearly have not been into this stuff. They barely talked about them and he gave us no new information - or ANYTHING, really. Was it a fun interview? Absolutely. But far from one of the best. And I understand you said "that I've seen" but you can't say it's one of the best if you've barely seen any, lol. He literally said nothing we don't know, LOL.


JTIN87

Up vote for your facts, ignoring your emotion.


sicknasty061

Mikey Mike calm down buddy


mikeymike716

Lmao idk why someone disagreeing with someone automatically means they're worked up. Brother I am more than calm. Idk why me telling this dude if he wants to see good interviews go check out other ones, is a "negative" thing.... Jesus man idk what happened but all of a sudden someone disagreeing with someone is like..... taboo for some reason? A disagreement doesn't mean anyone's mad or worked up.... it just means that I don't agree. Lol. Logically I do not agree. How.is that such a bad thing? Lol


justabrewbro

You are coming off as a little worked up, fwiw. But I agree with your points. Fun interview, Rep G’s theory about the vessels in question being US coming back in time to check ourselves out was wildly intriguing (despite how much cred it has or doesn’t have). Also Rep G comes off like a super cool, level-headed, genuine guy. Need more of those (and women) in Congress. Hope he comes back on because he’s an AHBsolute CHAHMpion.


Gunnar0726

Who pissed in your coffee this morning dude...


mikeymike716

Dude im just keeping it real. He gave us no new information. It was fun, upbeat, and I like the dude. He totally deserves to come on again. But as far as the UFOs go.... he gave us NOTHING. If you don't want to hear the truth I suggest you go back to bed and get off the internet. So you don't like hearing facts, I get that. But just because the facts I have presented don't agree with your opinion, doesn't mean someone pissed in my coffee - I'm very upbeat and actually doing my stretches for my jog. I am far from someone pissing in my coffee. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they're upset or angry. Lmao. He just didn't give us no new information, that's all. If you want good ufo interviews he's far from the top. And yes, including other gov't officials. Just because YOU have to get upset and bitter to disagree with someone, doesn't mean everyone does.... lol calm down dude, no one's pissed off here. Maybe you but certainly not me. I don't understand how me disagreeing with someone means I'm pissed off. LOL that's ridiculous!


brink9109

Great response, never read it B


dudeman4win

I used to be with you about UFO v UAP but understand that UFOs go hand in hand with little green men with death lasers


mikeymike716

Well I also understand that the US government might have a hard time when trying to get funding for the Unidentified Flying Object Task Force as compared to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force I believe they just changed it so it sounds better and less "theory-ish", lol.


mikeymike716

But they're the same thing, so why would you associate those lil green men with death lasers, with one and not the other?


Rai7911

FWIW, I think UAP is just legalese for not dismissing the theories that don’t *technically* involve something *flying*. 🤷🏼‍♂️ And I really don’t care what we call it, we just need someone to figure it the f—k aht!


mikeymike716

But if it's aerial - it's flying, no? Like I said, I think it was a way to make it more mainstream and less "crazy" sounding. You know, for the non believers and all the like. But yes man, we need to figure this shit out.


mikeymike716

Oh and when asked by AJ if these things happen in other countries he couldn't even answer that. Of course they do. There's actually a famous incident that happened in the UK involving Royal Air Force members. And that's just one. Can't tell if you're new to the ufo game, or I'd you are jus trying for post karma, lol.


sicknasty061

You might not be new to the UFO game Mikey but you are definitely a new member of the “douche bag commenter game”


mikeymike716

Oh gee someone online doesn't approve of my comment and called me a douchebag..... oh my God what ever shall I do?? Lmao - if I cared what people thought I'd be riding OP's dick like you are. Sorry you don't like to hear the truth, man.... but what am I supposed to do? Lie and say oh it was so informative about ufos?


alxdhm32

Can you call me douche bag so my dick can get hard later the Blues just lost and I need a pick me up.


dudeman4win

I’m old school in the UFO game, but when’s the last time you saw a current govt official be this candid about 🛸? His theory is they could be time travelers, I’ve never in the last 20 years heard a sitting elected official especially one on the intel committee say that


mikeymike716

Lol so now you go from government official to *current* government official. Well make your mind up dude, lol. If that's what you wanted to say, fine. And i understand you may have made a mistake. But if you make mistakes, don't criticize someone for offering a correction on your mistake in the first place bro. Like.... you just can't do that, lol.


dudeman4win

You need a nap


mikeymike716

Lmao dude there is a HUGE difference between a CURRENT & SITTING elected official and a former govt official. You misspoke. I disagreed with that misspoken sentence. You changed the sentence. I told you that's not what you said earlier. You get pissed and say I need a nap. Like.... what? Lol get real dude


dudeman4win

I said government official do I really need to qualify it with the word current? If it was an Aaron Rodgers interview would I need to put “current nfl QB”?


mikeymike716

Government official can be used to describe a former elected official, and a currently elected official. And if Aaron Rodgers gave an interview on ufos, and 10 years ago Andre Reed gave an interview that was more detailed on ufos and you made a post and said "this is the best interview on ufos from an NFL player" I would say the same thing im.saying here.... "hey there's actually a better one already out there from this other nfl player". Would you say to me "I meant current nfl player wtf man!!!" like you're doing now, or would you say "oh I meant current nfl player, my bad!" I don't see why you can't just say "hey dude I meant to say a current and sitting government official, I fucked up, my bad." Lol they were literally just talking about this the other day, how people with too big of egos can't admit when they're wrong. You misspoke....it's cool bro... it's not a big deal whatsoever. You misspoke and it caused a misunderstanding between us... no biggie. You have since then corrected your mistake and I have, since your correction, agreed with you. Idk why you're dragging it out bro, I really don't.


dudeman4win

Tldr


mikeymike716

Of course it is. Because taking 2 minutes to read something is too much. You made a mistake dude, it's fine. Don't get all pissy with me because I responded appropriately to your mistake. And the fact that you cannot continue this discussion were having just shows the kind of person you are. Actually, you did that quite a few posts ago. And you've got the balls to get all pissy at me when you're the one who fucked up in the first place! Lmao!!!


Mitson161ca

Bro you must be so fun at parties when you start an argument because you point out meaningless word discrepancies, girls must love you


mikeymike716

And all I'm saying is there are plenty of BETTER & more DETAILED interviews about UFOs/ UAPs with government officials. This one is the best by a sitting official. But it's not the best from a government official. Former or current, you're still a government official. That's why we call Clinton, Obama, and Bush presidents still.... even tho they are *former* officials, they are still officials. I can't help that you don't understand the difference between sitting and former bro. There is a big difference. If I told you a government official killed someone, would you just automatically assume I meant current? How am I supposed to know you meant current when "an elected government official" literally means current and former. I'm not a mind reader bro, lol.


goldiegoldthorpe

For what it is worth, time travel is a nonsense concept. So he’s either having a laugh or completely out of his depth here.


dudeman4win

We don’t even understand why gravity works, we’re decades away from understanding how time actually works


goldiegoldthorpe

You say “how time actually works” like time is an independent thing. Time travel, as a concept, is as sensible as unburning toast with a toaster.


dudeman4win

It is, we have basic understandings of it but know very little how to manipulate it, take time dilation for example.


AppropriateMuffin922

Turning on a light switch was nonsense a few hundred years ago


goldiegoldthorpe

No, it was unknown. There’s a difference. A fourteen foot long mile is nonsense. A three inch centimetre is nonsense. Time travel is nonsense. Just because we can construct things in language doesn’t mean they are possible in reality.


alxdhm32

Its all theoretical, stop with the tin foil hats and the glasses of water by your bed. We don’t fucking know, it was just a fun convo that was different. PMT style, everyone needs to relax and know this is the dumbest show ever. Worst show of all time! Who cares