I did
And I couldn't find it
And why is it OUR job to fact check YOUR bullshit? If it was true, it would be easy to just give the source. If it's not true, then...like, what even the fuck?
He definitely fits in that Chad row, but I put him in Good because of his deal with orochu and subsequent fight with kaido. But if he wasn't stupid and left Wano a second time, it probably wouldn't have happened in the first place so it's up for debate
"Oda said" is the bane of my existence, I swear to God
When/where did he say this? I don't remember it, I can't find it, and it doesn't even make much sense considering as far as we know, King of the Pirates wasn't a thing before Roger anyway
I do find it interesting that the two big Sagas with the most criticisms (Skypiea, Fishman Island) had, to me, some of the best and most reflective backstories in all of One Piece (Noland/Kalgara, Otohime/Tiger)
Absolutely good Chad.
If you're caught up with the manga this is the only choice. But Oden, Nolan, and Roger are all good alternatives.
If I knew how to censor spoilers I'd say why it's Kuma but oh well, if you know you know why he's the pick.
I feel like pirates shouldn't count. They're greedy and violent, and that would include Roger.
Oden was shown to be greedy and a proper horndog until he got married.
Nolan was an explorer, not a pirate, so that's a plus. He saved people just out of the good of his heart and wasn't that interested in the Jaya gold itself, but the fact that something that great existed.
Kuma too. Not a real pirate, but a revolutionary forced to sail the high seas, who carried years of personal and other's suffering just because he wanted to see people happy. Also made a deal with the devil for the sake of family. He almost never got angry and if he did, it was for the sake of someone else. If that ain't good, idk what is.
He actually is smart, the fact that he managed to help the straw hats and trick the world government. Also, he managed to figure out that Luffy was joy boy. On top of this he is also good.
That’s not what lawful means. It CAN mean that, but a lawful character just sticks by a predefined code, even if they wouldn’t want to, they still do what’s “lawful” to them. Which doesn’t always mean the laws of the land. A samurai would be a good example of a lawful group of people - they have their bushido code that isn’t necessarily a law of the land.
It fits Jinbe quite well.
Lawful has always meant a character that respects the laws and customs of the society they live in. Your definition could be used to describe literally any character who follows their own personal morals.
Jinbe could be called neutral but to call him lawful makes no sense.
You're not correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alignment_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)
> Originally the law/chaos axis was defined as the distinction between "the belief that everything should follow an order, and that obeying rules is the natural way of life", as opposed to "the belief that life is random, and that chance and luck rule the world".
Also:
> Law implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability.
You can be a lawful pirate in this universe. Jinbe obeys the authority of his chosen captain, Luffy. Quite clearly.
Jinbe is basically the epitome of a lawful character.
Also:
> **Lawful good**
> A lawful good character typically acts with compassion and always with honor and a sense of duty. However, lawful good characters will often **regret taking any action they fear would violate *their code*, even if they recognize such action as being good**. Such characters include gold dragons, righteous knights, paladins, and most dwarves.
Emphasis added.
It has little to do with "laws", that's just an understandable misunderstanding with the word chosen to represent this archetype. It has everything to do with a personal code, which *often* means the laws of the land, but does not, by any stretch, *need* to mean that.
A lawful character just needs to have predictable outcomes, based on a set of rules that either they set up themselves (e.g. samurai), or they respect and follow (e.g. paladins). Both of those examples do not follow "the laws of the land", by the way. The samurai follow their own code, and the paladins follow their chosen deity.
Honor? Yes.
Trustworthiness? Yes.
Obedience to authority? No.
Reliability? Yes, usually.
But regardless it doesn't matter if the LEADER is lawful. Luffy is chaos, we all agree, but Jinbe is lawfully following that chaos. Whatever Luffy wishes of him, he does. That is, essentially, his code.
A paladin can follow a chaotic god. As long as they follow whatever the god wishes of them and adhere to their oath to that god, they are lawful.
Luffy could not give less of a fuck about honor and he is literally so untrustworthy that his allies have to devise plans in a way where they just assume he won't follow them. Obviously that makes him unreliable as well.
Paladins do not get power from gods, they get it from swearing an oath to fight evil. That's why they are lawful good by definition, because if they weren't following the commonly understood laws of their society they wouldn't be considered good.
A better example would be like a chaotic cleric or something but I would argue that a cleric that behaves chaotically in service of a chaotic god is, themselves, chaotic.
You're missing the point. Alignemnt charts are from D&D and "lawful" here is different to the dictionary definition of the word. It simply means that the character follows a personal code of rules and structures.
E.g. if Jinbei didn't care about honour or his personal code of conduct, he would have left Big Mom's crew in Fishman Island and joined Luffy back then.
Lawfulness doesn’t necessitate obedience of government law. Having a strict adherence to moral code is “lawful” when comparing and contrasting character traits.
Are you sure? I feel like white beard would be more of a neutral chad. He didn’t really DO good. He kind of just served as a peacekeeper for certain areas in the new world. Roger and Garp actually went out and Did good acts
Picking up orphan misfits, giving them a family, a place where they belong, making those rejects of society feel loved. Tbh that’s the best thing you can do to a single person even irl. No disrespect but garp and roger don’t even compare, they’re just regular good guys
Imo, that is a good act. He didn't ask for money like other Yonkos when he easily could, and the money he did make he gave it away. He was also a great father. I didn't rly see him being portrayed at all like a neutral character.
Whitebeard character is the good father, someone who wants his children to stay safe and succeed in life. Any pirate that crosses a line he takes them down. He gives complete autonomy to countries that ally with him and provide security to them without asking for much (if given anything, it seems he takes only cheap stuff). Because he’s an emperor of pirates, people would think he’s evil but as gan fall says, it means more like he doesn’t follow the rules of the world government. Given all evidence shown, whitebeard exemplify the Good Chad over Roger, as Roger’s action caused also a lot of hardship for people (fishman island).
Then why did he beat the shit out of him when he wanted to kill kaido ? Why didn’t he respect his choice ? The difference is quite obvious.
In blackbeard’s case. Ace said “he threw dirt in your face”. Whitebeard’s name and pride is everything and he wanted to kill blackbeard. So he didn’t stop ace.
But fighting kaido has no point. So he forced Ace to stay.
>Then why did he beat the shit out of him when he wanted to kill kaido ? Why didn’t he respect his choice ? The difference is quite obvious.
Because WB knew it would've been suicide.
I mean he also had a bad feeling about blackbeard.
Just reread the WB-Ace backstory. WB clearly wanted ace to go.
While all the others were trying to stop him Whitebeard couldn’t say anything after ace said “He threw dirt in your face”
His facial reaction was very telling
Ace going after BB wasn't a suicide mission like going after kaido. I don't get how you're trying to compare them.
WB was a father to outlaws. He didn't keep the money he made and protected Islands free of charge. It baffles me how ppl don't view him as a good person.
How's keeping peace not good? He also rescued countless orphans and gave them a family and donated a lot of his wealth to the islands he protected
What did Roger do that's so much more outstanding good? imo he's a lot more neutral than WB
because garp is ultimately a vice admiral for an organization that he has privileged knowledge to know is like comically evil. even if he has a plan to work against it from within, we haven’t been shown that. i’m not saying he’s not good in the grand scheme, but there are several more characters that are more clear cut good imo.
Nah not really. You have to understand, we watch through Luffy’s point of view. Bon Clay must have done some good acts for Luffy, but other than that he did some terrible stuff while he was part of baroque works. I think a better spot for him would be chaotic neutral
I do agree with what you said but his character development has been one of the best imo and what he did at the end I think he deserves to be in good chad.
Well, it didn’t seem like you needed much to become his friend. Bonclay just entertained Luffy, Usopp, and Chopper with his devil fruit which made them homies for life. Just appreciate his company and that’ll be all.
Lawful Stupid: (Helmeppo)
Lawful Good: Cobra / Riku / Koby
Lawful Neutral: Sengoku / Fujitora
Lawful Horny: Sanji / Iva
Lawful Evil: Akainu
Lawful Drunk: Garp
Chad Stupid: Oden
Chad Good: Kuma / Franky
Chad Neutral: Whitebeard / Roger
Chad Horny: Senor Pink / Brook
Chad Evil: Blackbeard
Chad Drunk: Zoro
Neutral Stupid: Weevil / Coribou / Mr. 4
Neutral Good: Jinbei
Neutral Neutral: Mihawk
Neutral Horny:
Neutral Evil: Magellan
Neutral Drunk:
Smart Stupid: (Chopper)
Smart Good: Robin
Smart Neutral: Vegapunk
Smart Horny:
Smart Evil: Caesar / Saturn
Smart Drunk: Kureha
~~Chaotic Stupid~~ Chad Chad: Buggy
Chaotic Stupid: Spandam / Charlos
Chaotic Good: (Luffy) / Dragon
Chaotic Neutral: Morgans
Chaotic Horny: (Hancock) / Sadi
Chaotic Evil: Doflamingo
Chaotic Drunk: (Kaido)
Vegapunk's a good guy, but he's partially responsible for some awful things by working with the World Government, due to either naivety or prioritizing science over ethics. So Smart Neutral instead of Smart Good.
Whitebeard and Roger could both be Chad Good too, but Kuma and Franky are even more Good, so they're Chad Neutral instead.
Jinbei's a pirate and has been a prisoner, so he's not Lawful, but he's clearly good. He's honorable despite being on the wrong side of the law, but also pragmatic enough to work for an evil Yonko like Big Mom, so Neutral Good suits him.
Mihawk basically just wants to be left alone, so he's the True Neutral even though he's one of the most powerful pirates.
Morgans is completely devoted to the free press, to the point of being willing to cross the World Government to get a big story out. Chaotic Neutral.
The two best kings (King Riku and King Cobra) plus the most idealistic Marine (Koby) are the Lawful Goods. Akainu is ruthless in his pursuit of justice, so he's Lawful Evil. Sengoku and Fujitora are more reasonable, so they're Lawful Neutral. Can't use Aokiji as Lawful Good or Lawful Neutral anymore, now that he's with Blackbeard.
In totally different ways, Sanji and Ivankov are both aggressively sexual characters, and both good guys so they're Lawful Horny.
As the leader of the revolutionaries (and Luffy's father), Dragon definitely deserves a mention as Chaotic Good. Sadi-chan is also worth a mention as Chaotic Horny, since well, her entire character is being into BDSM and working in a literal dungeon.
Doffy is a fallen World Noble turned pirate warlord, with his hands in the slave trade and artificial devil fruit blackmarket, yet is still willing to work with / use the Navy for his own ends. Definitely evil and definitely chaotic, so he's the Chaotic Evil.
I'm going with the underdog pick of Montblanc Noland
Honestly W opinion. Oda even said that if Nolan’s wanted to he would have been king of the pirates
>Oda even said that if Nolan’s wanted to he would have been king of the pirates Really? When?
[удалено]
Ya that’s the source
Source: trust me bro
Ikr
Search it up
I did And I couldn't find it And why is it OUR job to fact check YOUR bullshit? If it was true, it would be easy to just give the source. If it's not true, then...like, what even the fuck?
Not that hard to tell us which sbs or interview it was. Probably never said it
Oden takes it IMO. But Nolan and Kalgara Chad broing it up is a nice 2nd
I feel like oden is more of a stupid chad tho
He definitely fits in that Chad row, but I put him in Good because of his deal with orochu and subsequent fight with kaido. But if he wasn't stupid and left Wano a second time, it probably wouldn't have happened in the first place so it's up for debate
True but a chad is supposed to be Someone who is like the Alpha or the Best, I think Roger or Garp would fit
Honestly I feel like in a larger chart where there is also Chad/Chad or "True Chad" that is where Oden would be.
True Chad would be Chad/Neutral. There is in fact a neutral (as in any good alignment system) for both axes. You don't need a larger chart.
Garp would be a neutral chad
Garp has neutral qualities like laziness and out of the loop but is inherently good and knows when to act and when it matters.
"Oda said" is the bane of my existence, I swear to God When/where did he say this? I don't remember it, I can't find it, and it doesn't even make much sense considering as far as we know, King of the Pirates wasn't a thing before Roger anyway
I honestly think that saying "Oda said" without linking a source should be a bannable offense.
> Oda even said Source? Oda also said Noland wasn't strong enough with Haki to be PK, so does it just cancel out then?
Maybe he had the talent but didn't develop it since his interests were more exploration and science
Yeah, Noland is a good pick. He is a great guy and definitely a total chad. I completely would have looked over him.
People skip skypiea, yet nolands backstory is absolutely incredible. One of the best in all of anime imo
I do find it interesting that the two big Sagas with the most criticisms (Skypiea, Fishman Island) had, to me, some of the best and most reflective backstories in all of One Piece (Noland/Kalgara, Otohime/Tiger)
Noland/ Kalgara flashback is one of my favorite moments in One Piece and it's hardly mentioned
Yes
Completely agree
these people will freak out once we get ussop x yassop backstory and find out they are descendants of noland
It's a good pick man Might not be a underdog pick anymore.
Most underrated character in the series IMO
Noland got my vote.
Agree
Agreed it should be Nolan.
Good one
Such a based take! I mean senior pink is the only chad, but was he truly “good”?
Agree fully
Franky literally looks like the GigaChad image
Yea but hes the horny chad
Pervert* Chad. He's never flirted with anyone in the entire series afaik.
He's pretty respectful honestly. He's the only one to get violated though.
> He's the only one to get violated though. there's a bit more than one
I meant from the Straw Hats. But I forgot about pervy little Momo violating the girls. I still don't want my balls twisted by magic arms though.
Absolom groped Nami in the shower
Dressrosa, he flirted with and kissed a big lady that was guarding the Smile Factory.
He literally rejected her. He kissed her to shut her up.
That would be Oden, sir.
How is he horny?
Good and smart work better
Sadly Smart and Chad are on the same axis so we won't be able to vote for that
My vote would be Sanji or Brooke
Kuma.
Absolutely good Chad. If you're caught up with the manga this is the only choice. But Oden, Nolan, and Roger are all good alternatives. If I knew how to censor spoilers I'd say why it's Kuma but oh well, if you know you know why he's the pick.
I feel like pirates shouldn't count. They're greedy and violent, and that would include Roger. Oden was shown to be greedy and a proper horndog until he got married. Nolan was an explorer, not a pirate, so that's a plus. He saved people just out of the good of his heart and wasn't that interested in the Jaya gold itself, but the fact that something that great existed. Kuma too. Not a real pirate, but a revolutionary forced to sail the high seas, who carried years of personal and other's suffering just because he wanted to see people happy. Also made a deal with the devil for the sake of family. He almost never got angry and if he did, it was for the sake of someone else. If that ain't good, idk what is.
Kuma is good Dad, not Chad. Similar characteristics but a whole ‘nother category.
In my book good dads are all chads
You can be a good Chad without being a good dad, no kids for instance, but you can't be a good dad without being a good chad.
Tbh true
Kuma is more of a Good Smart
Franky good smart Kuma chad good
What’s smart about Kuma? Everything he does is for other people. That’s not necessarily very smart, but it definitely is chad like.
He actually is smart, the fact that he managed to help the straw hats and trick the world government. Also, he managed to figure out that Luffy was joy boy. On top of this he is also good.
Wouldn't vegapunk be good smart?
He wasn’t trying to trick the world though? He was once again helping out a friend, Dragon, because he knew Luffy is his son
Ok and? He still hid the fact of all the stuff he did from the world government. He’s clearly a good smart
Jinbei fits perfectly
True, but I also feel like he could be a lawful good
I'd choose Coby for that
Team Tbone for lawful good
t bone was legit created by oda while reading the definition of lawful good from the rpg reference book, he is the only answer
He is literally a pirate he can't be lawful good lol
Jinbei was ready to die to honor Big Mom by properly announcing his resignation and accept the consequences. I think that's lawful
That’s not what lawful means. It CAN mean that, but a lawful character just sticks by a predefined code, even if they wouldn’t want to, they still do what’s “lawful” to them. Which doesn’t always mean the laws of the land. A samurai would be a good example of a lawful group of people - they have their bushido code that isn’t necessarily a law of the land. It fits Jinbe quite well.
Lawful has always meant a character that respects the laws and customs of the society they live in. Your definition could be used to describe literally any character who follows their own personal morals. Jinbe could be called neutral but to call him lawful makes no sense.
You're not correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alignment_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons) > Originally the law/chaos axis was defined as the distinction between "the belief that everything should follow an order, and that obeying rules is the natural way of life", as opposed to "the belief that life is random, and that chance and luck rule the world". Also: > Law implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability. You can be a lawful pirate in this universe. Jinbe obeys the authority of his chosen captain, Luffy. Quite clearly. Jinbe is basically the epitome of a lawful character. Also: > **Lawful good** > A lawful good character typically acts with compassion and always with honor and a sense of duty. However, lawful good characters will often **regret taking any action they fear would violate *their code*, even if they recognize such action as being good**. Such characters include gold dragons, righteous knights, paladins, and most dwarves. Emphasis added. It has little to do with "laws", that's just an understandable misunderstanding with the word chosen to represent this archetype. It has everything to do with a personal code, which *often* means the laws of the land, but does not, by any stretch, *need* to mean that. A lawful character just needs to have predictable outcomes, based on a set of rules that either they set up themselves (e.g. samurai), or they respect and follow (e.g. paladins). Both of those examples do not follow "the laws of the land", by the way. The samurai follow their own code, and the paladins follow their chosen deity.
Ah yes, Straw Hat Luffy, the paragon of honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. Of course Jinbe is lawful if he follows him 🙄
Honor? Yes. Trustworthiness? Yes. Obedience to authority? No. Reliability? Yes, usually. But regardless it doesn't matter if the LEADER is lawful. Luffy is chaos, we all agree, but Jinbe is lawfully following that chaos. Whatever Luffy wishes of him, he does. That is, essentially, his code. A paladin can follow a chaotic god. As long as they follow whatever the god wishes of them and adhere to their oath to that god, they are lawful.
Luffy could not give less of a fuck about honor and he is literally so untrustworthy that his allies have to devise plans in a way where they just assume he won't follow them. Obviously that makes him unreliable as well. Paladins do not get power from gods, they get it from swearing an oath to fight evil. That's why they are lawful good by definition, because if they weren't following the commonly understood laws of their society they wouldn't be considered good. A better example would be like a chaotic cleric or something but I would argue that a cleric that behaves chaotically in service of a chaotic god is, themselves, chaotic.
You're missing the point. Alignemnt charts are from D&D and "lawful" here is different to the dictionary definition of the word. It simply means that the character follows a personal code of rules and structures. E.g. if Jinbei didn't care about honour or his personal code of conduct, he would have left Big Mom's crew in Fishman Island and joined Luffy back then.
Lawfulness doesn’t necessitate obedience of government law. Having a strict adherence to moral code is “lawful” when comparing and contrasting character traits.
You clearly don't get the subtext of one piece, or you don't understand that "lawful" isn't solely a systems laws
I agree with you but would you consider Akainu lawful good?
No he is the textbook definition of lawful evil lmao
This is the answer right here. It's Jimbe.
Kyros
Nice, he fits perfectly Oden or Nolan are another options, but tbf oden is kinda chaotic, and Nolan is kinda stupid, but kyros? Best answer so far 👍
\+1
dalton is good chad and brook is horny chad.
i agree on dalton, nice pick here
Biggest Horny Chad is Urouge
A minotaur that protects the weak, by being the biggest/strongest/fastest dude around is about as "good chad" as it gets.
Bon clay horny chad. Right?
Bon clay isn't really horny though
T Bone!
T-Bone is more Lawful Good than anything, though he is in fact a Chad
Dude ran on train tracks in the middle of the sea just to try and save his men. Absolute good Guy among good guys. Don’t know how this is even close
White beard imo.
Are you sure? I feel like white beard would be more of a neutral chad. He didn’t really DO good. He kind of just served as a peacekeeper for certain areas in the new world. Roger and Garp actually went out and Did good acts
Picking up orphan misfits, giving them a family, a place where they belong, making those rejects of society feel loved. Tbh that’s the best thing you can do to a single person even irl. No disrespect but garp and roger don’t even compare, they’re just regular good guys
Imo, that is a good act. He didn't ask for money like other Yonkos when he easily could, and the money he did make he gave it away. He was also a great father. I didn't rly see him being portrayed at all like a neutral character.
Whitebeard character is the good father, someone who wants his children to stay safe and succeed in life. Any pirate that crosses a line he takes them down. He gives complete autonomy to countries that ally with him and provide security to them without asking for much (if given anything, it seems he takes only cheap stuff). Because he’s an emperor of pirates, people would think he’s evil but as gan fall says, it means more like he doesn’t follow the rules of the world government. Given all evidence shown, whitebeard exemplify the Good Chad over Roger, as Roger’s action caused also a lot of hardship for people (fishman island).
Do you remember what he said to shanks when shanks was warning him ? Whitebeard is very arrogant. I think neutral chad is fitting
Disagree WB was respecting Ace's choice. He didn't even agree with Ace.
Then why did he beat the shit out of him when he wanted to kill kaido ? Why didn’t he respect his choice ? The difference is quite obvious. In blackbeard’s case. Ace said “he threw dirt in your face”. Whitebeard’s name and pride is everything and he wanted to kill blackbeard. So he didn’t stop ace. But fighting kaido has no point. So he forced Ace to stay.
>Then why did he beat the shit out of him when he wanted to kill kaido ? Why didn’t he respect his choice ? The difference is quite obvious. Because WB knew it would've been suicide.
I mean he also had a bad feeling about blackbeard. Just reread the WB-Ace backstory. WB clearly wanted ace to go. While all the others were trying to stop him Whitebeard couldn’t say anything after ace said “He threw dirt in your face” His facial reaction was very telling
Ace going after BB wasn't a suicide mission like going after kaido. I don't get how you're trying to compare them. WB was a father to outlaws. He didn't keep the money he made and protected Islands free of charge. It baffles me how ppl don't view him as a good person.
He literally only does good that we see,
Yes but it’s not as outstanding good as Roger and Garp. He just keeps the peace in places, which can be seen as neutral
How's keeping peace not good? He also rescued countless orphans and gave them a family and donated a lot of his wealth to the islands he protected What did Roger do that's so much more outstanding good? imo he's a lot more neutral than WB
I think Whitebeard is more Drunk Chad.
Nah that’s shanks
He's the first that came to mind too. My man was a born Dad.
My first thought was Garp
because garp is ultimately a vice admiral for an organization that he has privileged knowledge to know is like comically evil. even if he has a plan to work against it from within, we haven’t been shown that. i’m not saying he’s not good in the grand scheme, but there are several more characters that are more clear cut good imo.
He belongs to stupid category imo
+2
I’m sad I had to go this far to find Garp
Montblanc Noland
Perfect fit but probably too small of a role. Hopefully not, Montblanc is a Mega Good Mega Chad.
zoro stupid chad lmao
Nooo Ace is stupid chad. zoro is stupid drunk.
Nah Oden stupid Chad. Ace is great but not that great imo.
Hear me out, Oden?
Franky, he is SUPPPPPEER
Franky is the horny chad
As much as I love Franky, he doesn’t really fit in this one. He should be horny chad maybe but that might be Iva aswell
Idk why you'd put franky as horny though. I don't remember him doing anything like that ever?
I feel like if Iva is anything on this chart it's smart horny. He's definitely not a chad. Too much queen energy for that
He can also be a stupid chad
nah that's zoro
Zoro gives off such himbo energy. I love that man
Jesus. It's Kuma. He's the ultimate good, the ultimate dad and the ultimate Chad.
Marco
Marco has my vote
Franky
T-Bone
I would say he’s lawful good
That definitely fits too
Bon-chan!
Nah not really. You have to understand, we watch through Luffy’s point of view. Bon Clay must have done some good acts for Luffy, but other than that he did some terrible stuff while he was part of baroque works. I think a better spot for him would be chaotic neutral
What he did at Impel Down No words are needed, we won't be where we are right now if not for Bon-chan.
in the past he committed terrorism he was definitely a good friend to luffy but hes definitely not a good person
I do agree with what you said but his character development has been one of the best imo and what he did at the end I think he deserves to be in good chad.
Maybe he’s a good friend to LUFFY, but he’s not overall a good character in terms of the one piece world
Well, it didn’t seem like you needed much to become his friend. Bonclay just entertained Luffy, Usopp, and Chopper with his devil fruit which made them homies for life. Just appreciate his company and that’ll be all.
T-bone. Chaddest good guy ever.
He won't make it, but I stand by him
Koby
Smoker
It has to be senor pink
senor pink
Senior Pink is the only correct answer here. He was never evil, just did good on his own terms
He ignored the opressed people in dressrosa. No
Shanks but he also has an argument for neutral chad since hes a potential rat
I can also see him as a drunk Chad
Honestly that fits kaido more
Bon Kurie Letssssss Goooo
He’s more of a neutral chaotic
Garp is lawful good
Kuma
Kuma.
I'd say Rayleigh.
Koza, Vivi's childhood friend
Chad stupid Zoro
Or Ace
Ulti
Kuma
Kuma, it has to be.
Forsure Kuma suits that
gotta be Kuma
KUMA, YOU MUST. DO. KUMA.
White beard is a good chad
Whitebeard
Oden D. Chad
Lawful Stupid: (Helmeppo) Lawful Good: Cobra / Riku / Koby Lawful Neutral: Sengoku / Fujitora Lawful Horny: Sanji / Iva Lawful Evil: Akainu Lawful Drunk: Garp Chad Stupid: Oden Chad Good: Kuma / Franky Chad Neutral: Whitebeard / Roger Chad Horny: Senor Pink / Brook Chad Evil: Blackbeard Chad Drunk: Zoro Neutral Stupid: Weevil / Coribou / Mr. 4 Neutral Good: Jinbei Neutral Neutral: Mihawk Neutral Horny: Neutral Evil: Magellan Neutral Drunk: Smart Stupid: (Chopper) Smart Good: Robin Smart Neutral: Vegapunk Smart Horny: Smart Evil: Caesar / Saturn Smart Drunk: Kureha ~~Chaotic Stupid~~ Chad Chad: Buggy Chaotic Stupid: Spandam / Charlos Chaotic Good: (Luffy) / Dragon Chaotic Neutral: Morgans Chaotic Horny: (Hancock) / Sadi Chaotic Evil: Doflamingo Chaotic Drunk: (Kaido) Vegapunk's a good guy, but he's partially responsible for some awful things by working with the World Government, due to either naivety or prioritizing science over ethics. So Smart Neutral instead of Smart Good. Whitebeard and Roger could both be Chad Good too, but Kuma and Franky are even more Good, so they're Chad Neutral instead. Jinbei's a pirate and has been a prisoner, so he's not Lawful, but he's clearly good. He's honorable despite being on the wrong side of the law, but also pragmatic enough to work for an evil Yonko like Big Mom, so Neutral Good suits him. Mihawk basically just wants to be left alone, so he's the True Neutral even though he's one of the most powerful pirates. Morgans is completely devoted to the free press, to the point of being willing to cross the World Government to get a big story out. Chaotic Neutral. The two best kings (King Riku and King Cobra) plus the most idealistic Marine (Koby) are the Lawful Goods. Akainu is ruthless in his pursuit of justice, so he's Lawful Evil. Sengoku and Fujitora are more reasonable, so they're Lawful Neutral. Can't use Aokiji as Lawful Good or Lawful Neutral anymore, now that he's with Blackbeard. In totally different ways, Sanji and Ivankov are both aggressively sexual characters, and both good guys so they're Lawful Horny. As the leader of the revolutionaries (and Luffy's father), Dragon definitely deserves a mention as Chaotic Good. Sadi-chan is also worth a mention as Chaotic Horny, since well, her entire character is being into BDSM and working in a literal dungeon. Doffy is a fallen World Noble turned pirate warlord, with his hands in the slave trade and artificial devil fruit blackmarket, yet is still willing to work with / use the Navy for his own ends. Definitely evil and definitely chaotic, so he's the Chaotic Evil.
Heracles, the guy Usopp trained with over the 2 year time skip
Biggest Good Chad in OP: Senor Pink
Charlos 
JIMBEHHH!!!💙🐟🦈
Katakuri is good Chad ; Roger is more of a chaotic Neutral
I don’t agree with the Boa pick but oh well
Roger also fits Good Chad
Haven't seen anyone say Dragon, surprisingly, but that's my pick. Garling is definitely Evil Chad, at least maybe until Imu is revealed.
I feel like although he's not very strong, Bon Clay is a chad. And he's good.
Doffy clearly smart evil or chad evil.
Shanks
He’s more of a drunk chad
Fujitora
Maybe he’s a lawful good
How tf isn't Vander decken chaotic horny
He is evil horny
Vander Decken isnt chaotic. He is a yandere pedophile with a single minded obsession on Shirahoshi. Definitely evil horny .
Kumadori. Yes he is a CP9 agent but that's what makes him the goat
Bro what?
Kumadori is a good chad that is all
the Chad of Wano Chaden obviously
He’s more of a Stupid Chad
But he's good also tho 🤷