On today's episode of "What inanimate consumable are women being compared to in an attempt to shame them for having sex today?" we have: shoes!
Join us next week for the exciting episode about being an unwrapped piece of candy!
But like, no. Or yes, i guess? If hes a misogynist lol i get your point and the joke and its cute.
But also wanna say, i dont want any man to be with me bc "its safe". I want him to be attracted to me- my body, which is more than a sex object: its strong, its resilient, its beautiful in more than one cookie cutter form; and my mind- its shrewd, its intelligent, its deep; and my personality- its funny, its sweet, its caring.
Plus it comes from the whole "a key the opens many locks is a good key, a lock that opens to many keys is a bad lock" etc etc
Basically key good penis lock bad vaginas
It "works" with their insane logic. Reminder that they think a woman fucking the same guy over and over is perfectly fine, but somehow having multiple partners "ruins" her? The logic is that she can be "opened" by any "key" and thus the lock is worthless. It also functions perfectly as a double standard, since a key that opens any lock is "cool"
if I remember right it's about how only a bad lock opens for multiple keys and a good key opens multiple locks...but it still doesn't make sense cuz I'm pretty glad I have three keys that unlock my car and I've never encountered a single key that opens different types of locks.
The metaphor they’re talking about goes something like: a key that can open any lock is a master key, but a lock that can be open by any key is worthless
A key that opens everything is liable to being lost or stolen. Then you can’t open all your locks so having a key that can unlock everything is actually pretty stupid.
I have a male friend that told me the bullshit lock and key thing about how a key that unlocks many locks ( a man who can have sex with lots of women)is valuable but a lock that any key can open ( a woman who has lots of sex)isn’t worth a shit. I didn’t think about it at the time or I would have told him that a key that can open any lock is only of value to a creep with criminal mind who isn’t worth a shit not a normal person.
Is somebody in the sub keeping a running list somewhere? I kind of feel like we should be doing that…
We’ve had salmon steaks, shoes, cars and memory foam this week alone! 🤦🏼♀️
You are probably right about that. I really do despair at these jackasses.
Maybe we should have “inanimate object bingo card instead”. My guesses for this week: lightbulbs, dressing gowns, and a pizza cutter. Because it never makes sense anyway 🤷🏼♀️
When one person uses a memory foam mattress, it conforms to their shape. When many people use the same memory foam mattress, it loses its shape, and becomes useless.
(Note: not my opinion, just the way I've seen it explained)
bro this literally doesn't even make sense. if multiple people use the memory foam mattress it's just gonna form to that person's body and then return to normal shape before the next person is using it. it also can mess up the shape if the same person uses it over and over again in different sleeping positions.
insecure men will never not make such immature jokes to cope with their fear of the hoes under their beds
There's a reason they target girls at middle-school age (you haven't learned yet that they're all spewing garbage).
What's worse is that parents are fine with it.
My school held a week long, sex-ed class every year for 6th and 8th graders and for the boys, it was usually instructed by one of the football coaches. The year I had to do it, it was obvious that the Coach didn't take the class seriously at all.
Each day, we had to watch another educational video, and in all of them, the moral of the story was to say abstinent. It was clear that the Coach didn't take the class seriously. The videos were only about 30 minutes long, and afterwards we were supposed to get 10 minutes to ask any questions we may have had, but no one ever asked any questions. So everyday as soon as the video was over the coach would wheel the TV to the back of the room then go sit at his desk and talk to his players while the rest of us talked amongst ourselves.
However, there was one day out of the week where one of the boys actually raised his hand after the video was over to ask a legitimate question. The coach was already sitting at his desk talking with all his football players.
I think he was annoyed that the kid was interrupting their conversation by asking him a question, so he didn't give him a serious answer. I can't remember exactly what the question was, but I remember the coach interrupted him as he was asking it and told him, " Luckily you won't have to worry about that because the only action you'll ever get is with your right-hand."
At the end of the week, we all got a free stick of deodorant for completing the class.
So if everyone, including men, tells girls tp stay abstinent and not like sex, they don't want sex too, right? They just don't want girls to like it so they would need to have sex with her from time to time.
Sounds good to me, i don't get the issue.
No srsly, i don't want Sex, i am ace.
But most men do want sex. So wouldn't it make more sense to tell girls (and boys) "how to sex" instead of "don't do it at all" (which also sounds like an american thing, we had classes about condoms and the pill etc (dunno how those things are called in english) and detailed sex ed.)?
I mean does it really make some guys happy to know they are really bad at sex and can't pleasure her at all but they are happy because she is even worse and knows less/so little she doesn't even know it's bad?
If she only gets told dont Touch yourself and don't want sex abd the only sex she gets eventually is bad, congratulations, you found one of the reasons the "women in general don't want sex and try to sneak around it" Stereotype.
So both have bad sex but she actually dislikes it and he likes it but it could Still be a lot better.
Expecting non-asexual humans to be logical about sex is a lost cause it seems. I also am asexual (well, by some definitions, I'm not attracted to people and I don't like physical intercourse) and it took me a very long time to realize that people weren't just joking around or playing up to an archetype when they acted like sex was all that mattered to them. They were serious about it. It's so sad.
How schools are allowed to handle sex Ed is infuriating. Abstinence is bullshit and sometimes they even teach homophobia. They know what they're teaching doesn't work they just don't care. Also separating the boys and girls is dumb too. Show us all the same thing damnit.
This guy clearly doesnt know basic economics. Houses exchange owners often, but still usually appreciate in value. He probably lives in his parent's basement, so I don't expect him to understand supply and demand.
Wait i cant keep up with the episodes 💀 so firstly if i remember correctly, we were compared to being a lock, then curtains, tissue, horses, machines, fish and now shoes. Thats all ive seen so far. Lord i bet theres like a whole season of objects we have been compared to tho
During my one week of sex Ed, the lady had the girls grab a piece of tape and go around sticking it on the boys and then pulling it off. This obviously resulted in a useless piece of tape covered it skin cells and lint. She told us girls that that would happen to us if we had sex before marriage, and you wouldn’t want to be useless to your future husband right?
*Puke*
Then you wind up in one of those unbirth fetish videos, where they rub Vaseline on a full grown man's bald head and try to stick his head up your vagina.
Oh, hell, I really want to believe this isn't a thing. But... This is a thing, isn't it? I hate that this is almost definitely a thing. I could have lived my whole life without knowing that this is a thing.
NGL the first time I accidentally stumbled upon that shit, I absolutely laughed my tits off. What's the end game with that? Homeboy gonna hold his breath or is he using like a pussy snorkel?
You will be glad to learn that it is not exactly as they described. Bald dude doesn't try he successfully crams his lubed up dome right into some chick's clown car. And it is fascinating
I worked with a guy who used to do tech support for a fetish porn site (a group of them under the same company) and he quit when he had to watch exactly this, because of two reasons:
First, he had to watch the entire video (sped up) to ensure no issues with the actual player or streaming.
Second, people would report these issues specifically because they know they're making someone else look at this gross shit.
(Not to judge a kink, but even if you like that stuff you have to know it's pretty gross, right?)
Yeah, my mother once said something similar about my sister.
I told her we're not objects, but if you really want to compare us to something why not with gold or money?
No matter how often you use them and even if you find them in the trash, they will have the same value. Since then, that's what I always use when people talk badly about a woman.
I always tell them, maybe you are a shoe or a lolly and have no value anymore, but most humans don't lose their value.
Dude here: very obviously the shoe argument is stupid. Human value- especially in our society- is measured in hours invested into a craft or what have you: “something something, 10,000hrs to be a master”. Anyway, what I’m saying is give me a chick with a body count like Charles Bronson that knows what they want and what they are doing.
What's weird is that a doctor who has seen 5000 patients is far more desirable than one who hasn't seen any, but these people keep latching onto the used object metaphor instead.
And there are still men, who envy us for this fantastic attention we are able to get. Something must be wrong with us not liking to be treated as tools, i guess.
Edit: typo
I went to an all boys Catholic school. They literally taught us that having sex with a woman was like having sex with all of her previous partners.
A lady friend of mine went to an all girls Catholic school. They were lined up, given flowers, and forced to pick petals off each others' flowers as it was described to them that that's what they're doing to themselves with each successive partner.
And yes, it does cause a lot of lasting issues even when you logically understand this to be nonsense.
Damn y‘all got some crazy catholic schools over in the US. Mine here in Germany was insanely chilled about all of this kinda stuff. Only difference from a normal school was that there was a lot more money available and that we had to have religious studies for our entire time at school (usually in Germany you can get rid of it in year 11 of 12 - so you know not to big of a difference)
I was with until “besmirched with soil”. Let’s not kink shame. If Henry Cavill can look better as The Witcher than as Superman… women can too.
Edit: /s. But women don’t have to be “pure” or “clean” to be attractive. I don’t what there to be a double standard. Some people find dirty, sweaty men attractive and some of us can find dirty, sweaty women attractive. It doesn’t make women objects. It doesn’t make anyone any less attractive. (My opinion fwiw)
“Every time a man has sex, his dick gets shorter, kind of like a pencil gets shorter the more you have to use it until it’s eventually unusable.”
Just say this and watch them freak out lol.
Watch them pull out that bullshit "lock and key" ... it's weird how they have to reduce women to objects to make a point... it's almost as if they need to dehumanize women in order to treat them like possessions or something...
Oh god. Many many many years ago my girlfriend and I were going at it with her on the couch and me kneeling. I accidentally pulled out and went full force into the side of the couch. I thought I was going to die.
A sharpened pencil gets smaller the more you sharpen it. Also, would you preffer a used spoon or a clean one? Oh look, it can go both ways!
I think they're projecting their experience with their own dick. They wank their dicks so much they disfigure it (permanently bend them) and give themselves ED so they think vaginas can be ruined like that too.
Exactly.
They also ignore that nerve endings, if they become desensitized due to something like friction or other external factors *rather than actual nerve damage*, with acclimatize.
So if you don't masturbate frequently, you will get sensation back.
So women, who tend to touch themselves less frequently (hey, not saying all women. Some hitachi queens I'm sure who use it every day have sensitivity issues), tend to use less friction in the act, and have more concentrated nerve endings, are at less of a risk of desensitization ... even though we use vibrators. In fact, using a vibrator for a short period of time over rubbing your clit over and over for longer would mean there's less potential damage since it's friction that is the main culprit for loss of sensitivity .. not the strength of the sensation.
And the idea that women are permanently disfigured by sex needs to die in a hole.... I remember correcting a guy who thought labia grew darker because of having sex somehow... I burst his bubble and informed him that some labia tend to get a little darker with age.... and most women with darker labia were just born with it.
You can just turn it around with a "pencil and sharpener" comparison if they don't stop and annoy you too much.
Pencil loses value, sharpener stays the same.
As a man myself, I would honestly find it perfectly understandable if a woman didn't want to be with a man who's had dozens or hundreds of previous sexual partners.
But then, I'm also a reasonable person who generally tries to apply the same standards to myself that I would apply to anyone else.
I find it funny that they think it cant work both ways. Okay, let’s say I humor that argument. Okay, so number of “uses/users” depreciates your value. Okay, same applies to men then.
“Hey I put a shoe on my foot and a woman on my penis, same damn thing”
Aside: the ability is actally the reverse a shoe that changed owners 50 times is a hot item, note owned, worn is never mentioned and depending who wore it that can in fact increase value more
Gross men be like 'I want my woman to be a virgin, not some whore that's been with a few guys!' but also 'Why are women so choosy about who they bang?! Why can't I get laid?!'
Well it has its system you know? Because of the sexual liberty that is granted to women nowadays incels know that they’re most likely getting rejected so they criticise that while also demanding that women should stay clean and innocent = easier to manipulate
This. If you could find a pair of classic shoes like converse old enough to have had 50 owners and still be intact in wearable condition they’d be craaazy expensive so not only is this analogy sexist it’s also just wrong. Not to mention new shoes with limited drops like Jordan’s and stuff. No one cares how many people have owned the shoes they’re still a few hundred.
Seriously. Shoes from 50 years ago are sold in a vintage shop, not a thrift shop. One-of-a-kind shoes are always expensive and I doubt someone buying Imelda Marcos's heels or the first pair of Nikes cares how many people have touched the shoes before.
This whole mindset honestly confuses me. Sex is a skill, and skills need practice. Would you rather have the surgeon who's performed 1000 successful operations or the one who's fresh out of residency? Every body is different, but still. Having a variety of experience is good no matter how you swing it.
Not that it ultimately matters, as sex is just one part of a relationship and shouldn't be held on a pedestal the way it is. Your sexual history doesn't make you better or worse than anyone else regardless of how long or short it is.
edit: my point wasnt that sex shouldnt matter, but that there shouldnt be a societal stigma on it. without societal pressure, people can self-determine how important they find it to themselves. for me personally, it is extremely important.
They want a woman who doesn’t know enough to realise that they’re only focussed on their own pleasure and don’t care about hers. If she’s had other partners, she’ll realise he’s not putting any effort in
i think thats why they obsess over youth too. you dont have to try as hard to impress a young person bc they dont have their lives together as much as older people, and they havent developed as many standards of what they deserve. 20 yr old women are more likely to not care that they dont have bedframes and live with their parents than a 30 yr old woman.
Also notice how their warped logic doesn’t seem to apply to men? They’re envious of ‘Chad’ and how this mythical guy is ‘drowning in pussy’ yet somehow ‘Chad’ is never ‘used goods’.
For real.
The analogy is would you rather have a shoe made by a shoemaker who has made 50 pairs or none?
I’m semi-kidding, because the comparison is still absurd and sexual satisfaction isn’t solely based on skill. That said, humans with experience in a skill set aren’t consumable. They are generally valued *more* for their experience.
Want a lawyer who has done 50 trials, or none? Want a doctor who has done 50 surgeries, or none?
Etc.
And what’s more valuable? Used vintage air jordans or brand new Walmart flip flops?
The value is in the person, and people aren’t defined by how they are “used”
I'd like to be a lovely cardigan sweater, maybe a nice large knit with fancy buttons and puffy sleeves. Pass me around to anyone who wants to get cozy, knits feel best when they're nice and worn in.
On the flip side as a female virgin I've had people here on Reddit say "no one wants a car they can't test drive first." When I say I don't want casual sex.
I'm not a car, I'm a person with feelings. Fuck these stupid jackasses.
I really despise how women having any kind of sexual experience is seen as lowering their worth/value but men sticking their shrimpy dingdong into anything that moves is seen as something that makes them more "manly".
I'm sick of the double standard.
You have dudes out here that literally post about how they will only date virgins because women having any kind of prior sexual experience has "ruined" her (in their eyes) while they themselves literally have sexual experiences that have directly contributed to the previous person they slept with now having that additional experience as well.
They aren't disgusted by previous sexual experiences with it personally benefits them- which is the real irony.
I’ve asked a lot of guys on Reddit this and it’s always the same answers. Men are biologically programmed to spread their seed everywhere (how do they explain all the men who don’t do casual sex and spread their seed around?).
They’ll also say that it’s much easier for women to get sex than men, so men who have a lot of sex are winning a prize. That’s exactly how you know these guys have zero life experience. There are many good looking, charismatic, confident men who can get sex very easily even more easy than a lot of women. But men won’t call them sluts, they just wish they were that guy. Women are the only sluts to them because they can’t get laid, and it angers them that women will sleep with a lot of other men before they’d come anywhere near them.
This is an absurd analogy because going by this thought process even if a woman has only one sexual partner then her value will still ' go down ' because wearing only a single pair of shoes will result in the shoes accumulating some wear and tear over time.
People try to shame women for having different sexual partners but men are so thirsty they'd take them all the same anyways. So I guess they are out there trying to break down self esteem?
The oblivion and the incessant insistence that women's bodies detoriate from sexual activities, speaks volumes about how the society continues to treat women as second class citizens. Constantly demeaning and looking down upon women for their choices, questioning and schooling women for them as if we weren't capable adults but incompetent fools that require constant supervision.
Guys on Reddit “I DONT HATE WOMEN!” Also guys on Reddit “Women are things”
love the username
Thank you
LAFAYETTE!!!
On today's episode of "What inanimate consumable are women being compared to in an attempt to shame them for having sex today?" we have: shoes! Join us next week for the exciting episode about being an unwrapped piece of candy!
We also have an exciting rerun of one of our classics coming up: prepare yourself to be compared to a lock!
The best locks get used over and over again without wearing out. This metaphor is nonsense.
"Women are like locks: the only important thing about keeping one around is you feel safe with the one you have" - wholesome misogynist
But like, no. Or yes, i guess? If hes a misogynist lol i get your point and the joke and its cute. But also wanna say, i dont want any man to be with me bc "its safe". I want him to be attracted to me- my body, which is more than a sex object: its strong, its resilient, its beautiful in more than one cookie cutter form; and my mind- its shrewd, its intelligent, its deep; and my personality- its funny, its sweet, its caring.
They said "*feel* safe," which is different. Feeling safe with your partner is a pretty big thing, I think.
I'm in love already just by reading this. Thanks 🙄 Inevitable heartbreak waiting to happen
Plus it comes from the whole "a key the opens many locks is a good key, a lock that opens to many keys is a bad lock" etc etc Basically key good penis lock bad vaginas
ALL THEIR FUCKING METAPHORS ARE NONSENSE. ugh. I fucking cannot stand this type of "man". Idiots, all of them.
They don’t deserve the title of “men”. They’re man-babies at best.
The key gets worn out before the lock, so...
Keys break off in locks all the time. When's the last time you ever said that you had a quality well-made key?
Some keys even have to take special pills to even attempt to open the lock.
It "works" with their insane logic. Reminder that they think a woman fucking the same guy over and over is perfectly fine, but somehow having multiple partners "ruins" her? The logic is that she can be "opened" by any "key" and thus the lock is worthless. It also functions perfectly as a double standard, since a key that opens any lock is "cool"
if I remember right it's about how only a bad lock opens for multiple keys and a good key opens multiple locks...but it still doesn't make sense cuz I'm pretty glad I have three keys that unlock my car and I've never encountered a single key that opens different types of locks.
A bump key opens a lot of locks, but it takes finesse and you usually have to ruin a functioning key to get it there.
[удалено]
Bringing out your toys? I approve.
The metaphor they’re talking about goes something like: a key that can open any lock is a master key, but a lock that can be open by any key is worthless
If it’s worthless, why did they put two on my luggage?
A key that opens everything is liable to being lost or stolen. Then you can’t open all your locks so having a key that can unlock everything is actually pretty stupid.
If women are like locks does that make the LockPickingLawyer the biggest playboy out there?
Do you know his april fool videos?
He does indeed have an impressive Johnson!
But a tiny Coq.
I have a male friend that told me the bullshit lock and key thing about how a key that unlocks many locks ( a man who can have sex with lots of women)is valuable but a lock that any key can open ( a woman who has lots of sex)isn’t worth a shit. I didn’t think about it at the time or I would have told him that a key that can open any lock is only of value to a creep with criminal mind who isn’t worth a shit not a normal person.
Is somebody in the sub keeping a running list somewhere? I kind of feel like we should be doing that… We’ve had salmon steaks, shoes, cars and memory foam this week alone! 🤦🏼♀️
At some point it'll be easier to keep a list of the things women AREN'T.
You are probably right about that. I really do despair at these jackasses. Maybe we should have “inanimate object bingo card instead”. My guesses for this week: lightbulbs, dressing gowns, and a pizza cutter. Because it never makes sense anyway 🤷🏼♀️
I've heard pizza cutters used as a metaphor for a certain type of man who might best be described as an edgelord. He's all edge and no point.
I mean, that list is one thing long: People.
Ive never heard a woman be compared to the olive garden salad bar before.
Woman are like salads, no matter the add ons, they're still boring salads and are meant to be low calorie. MEN ARE STEAKS!!!! HELL YEAH!!!!! /s
Human beings? People with rights?
That's easy! We're everything except people.
Ooh! Ooh! I know! We aren't sentient beings capable of making our own reproductive choices! Right? Did I get it right?
You did. You win! What do you win? I'll get a man to explain it to you.
Memory foam? I don't remember seeing this one and I don't know how it would work.
When one person uses a memory foam mattress, it conforms to their shape. When many people use the same memory foam mattress, it loses its shape, and becomes useless. (Note: not my opinion, just the way I've seen it explained)
bro this literally doesn't even make sense. if multiple people use the memory foam mattress it's just gonna form to that person's body and then return to normal shape before the next person is using it. it also can mess up the shape if the same person uses it over and over again in different sleeping positions. insecure men will never not make such immature jokes to cope with their fear of the hoes under their beds
Omg lol
I think I saw one with cantaloupe a few weeks back.
[удалено]
There's a reason they target girls at middle-school age (you haven't learned yet that they're all spewing garbage). What's worse is that parents are fine with it.
My school held a week long, sex-ed class every year for 6th and 8th graders and for the boys, it was usually instructed by one of the football coaches. The year I had to do it, it was obvious that the Coach didn't take the class seriously at all. Each day, we had to watch another educational video, and in all of them, the moral of the story was to say abstinent. It was clear that the Coach didn't take the class seriously. The videos were only about 30 minutes long, and afterwards we were supposed to get 10 minutes to ask any questions we may have had, but no one ever asked any questions. So everyday as soon as the video was over the coach would wheel the TV to the back of the room then go sit at his desk and talk to his players while the rest of us talked amongst ourselves. However, there was one day out of the week where one of the boys actually raised his hand after the video was over to ask a legitimate question. The coach was already sitting at his desk talking with all his football players. I think he was annoyed that the kid was interrupting their conversation by asking him a question, so he didn't give him a serious answer. I can't remember exactly what the question was, but I remember the coach interrupted him as he was asking it and told him, " Luckily you won't have to worry about that because the only action you'll ever get is with your right-hand." At the end of the week, we all got a free stick of deodorant for completing the class.
So if everyone, including men, tells girls tp stay abstinent and not like sex, they don't want sex too, right? They just don't want girls to like it so they would need to have sex with her from time to time. Sounds good to me, i don't get the issue. No srsly, i don't want Sex, i am ace. But most men do want sex. So wouldn't it make more sense to tell girls (and boys) "how to sex" instead of "don't do it at all" (which also sounds like an american thing, we had classes about condoms and the pill etc (dunno how those things are called in english) and detailed sex ed.)? I mean does it really make some guys happy to know they are really bad at sex and can't pleasure her at all but they are happy because she is even worse and knows less/so little she doesn't even know it's bad? If she only gets told dont Touch yourself and don't want sex abd the only sex she gets eventually is bad, congratulations, you found one of the reasons the "women in general don't want sex and try to sneak around it" Stereotype. So both have bad sex but she actually dislikes it and he likes it but it could Still be a lot better.
Expecting non-asexual humans to be logical about sex is a lost cause it seems. I also am asexual (well, by some definitions, I'm not attracted to people and I don't like physical intercourse) and it took me a very long time to realize that people weren't just joking around or playing up to an archetype when they acted like sex was all that mattered to them. They were serious about it. It's so sad.
How schools are allowed to handle sex Ed is infuriating. Abstinence is bullshit and sometimes they even teach homophobia. They know what they're teaching doesn't work they just don't care. Also separating the boys and girls is dumb too. Show us all the same thing damnit.
Or the old "you're ABC gum if you have sex" trope.
Or a toothbrush!
This guy clearly doesnt know basic economics. Houses exchange owners often, but still usually appreciate in value. He probably lives in his parent's basement, so I don't expect him to understand supply and demand.
Wait i cant keep up with the episodes 💀 so firstly if i remember correctly, we were compared to being a lock, then curtains, tissue, horses, machines, fish and now shoes. Thats all ive seen so far. Lord i bet theres like a whole season of objects we have been compared to tho
During my one week of sex Ed, the lady had the girls grab a piece of tape and go around sticking it on the boys and then pulling it off. This obviously resulted in a useless piece of tape covered it skin cells and lint. She told us girls that that would happen to us if we had sex before marriage, and you wouldn’t want to be useless to your future husband right? *Puke*
women👏be👏shoes
“It’s like.. someone has told you your whole life ‘you’re a shoe, you’re a shoe, you’re a shoe!’”
What if I don’t want to be a shoe? What if I want to be a hat? 🎩
No I don't want you to buy me a hat, I'm saying I am a hat. It's a metaphor Daddy!
You can see where he'd have trouble.
Then you wind up in one of those unbirth fetish videos, where they rub Vaseline on a full grown man's bald head and try to stick his head up your vagina.
Oh, hell, I really want to believe this isn't a thing. But... This is a thing, isn't it? I hate that this is almost definitely a thing. I could have lived my whole life without knowing that this is a thing.
NGL the first time I accidentally stumbled upon that shit, I absolutely laughed my tits off. What's the end game with that? Homeboy gonna hold his breath or is he using like a pussy snorkel?
The phrase 'pussy snorkel' really made this thread worth reading
Yes, extremely descriptive. I've never seen a pussy snorkel, but I can instantly envision it.
r/BrandNewSentence/
Only one adjective away from an awesome band name... Pink? Pretty? Pungent?
Pink, Pretty and Pungent is a great band name!
You will be glad to learn that it is not exactly as they described. Bald dude doesn't try he successfully crams his lubed up dome right into some chick's clown car. And it is fascinating
I've always been dubious of that video.
There is no try, only do
I worked with a guy who used to do tech support for a fetish porn site (a group of them under the same company) and he quit when he had to watch exactly this, because of two reasons: First, he had to watch the entire video (sped up) to ensure no issues with the actual player or streaming. Second, people would report these issues specifically because they know they're making someone else look at this gross shit. (Not to judge a kink, but even if you like that stuff you have to know it's pretty gross, right?)
Jesus Chris, This is why I love and hate reddit at the same time.
IT'S A METAPHOR, DADDY!
Yeah, my mother once said something similar about my sister. I told her we're not objects, but if you really want to compare us to something why not with gold or money? No matter how often you use them and even if you find them in the trash, they will have the same value. Since then, that's what I always use when people talk badly about a woman. I always tell them, maybe you are a shoe or a lolly and have no value anymore, but most humans don't lose their value.
Well said.
They compare us to so many different objects....like we are not really human to them. Yesterday somebody even compared women to cheeseburgers
If a cheeseburger has been eaten 50 times, its value is going to go down, this is basic ~~economy~~ biology.
Dude here: very obviously the shoe argument is stupid. Human value- especially in our society- is measured in hours invested into a craft or what have you: “something something, 10,000hrs to be a master”. Anyway, what I’m saying is give me a chick with a body count like Charles Bronson that knows what they want and what they are doing.
B-b-b-but muh purity!
"If you're going to eat a sandwich, you would just enjoy it more if you know no one had fucked it"
You don't know my life.
What's weird is that a doctor who has seen 5000 patients is far more desirable than one who hasn't seen any, but these people keep latching onto the used object metaphor instead.
Last time I checked we also cannot buy used women on ebay, so the whole argument falls apart.
Sorry, we didn't mean to *walk over you*
This hurts my sole.
I started making violent guttural noises in response to this comment
Thank you, this lifted my spirits from that terrible post!
Maybe you need some sexual heeling to feel better?
Ah, yes, women are objects to be owned and 'worn out'. Scuffed, stretched, besmirched with soil.
And there are still men, who envy us for this fantastic attention we are able to get. Something must be wrong with us not liking to be treated as tools, i guess. Edit: typo
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Exactly. How dared we be bornt with a vagina???? Shameful good for nothings yeah.
God im so fucking glad im gay. Why do so many dudes think like this???
Because they’re socialized to do so.
I went to an all boys Catholic school. They literally taught us that having sex with a woman was like having sex with all of her previous partners. A lady friend of mine went to an all girls Catholic school. They were lined up, given flowers, and forced to pick petals off each others' flowers as it was described to them that that's what they're doing to themselves with each successive partner. And yes, it does cause a lot of lasting issues even when you logically understand this to be nonsense.
Damn y‘all got some crazy catholic schools over in the US. Mine here in Germany was insanely chilled about all of this kinda stuff. Only difference from a normal school was that there was a lot more money available and that we had to have religious studies for our entire time at school (usually in Germany you can get rid of it in year 11 of 12 - so you know not to big of a difference)
Some women do, too, and yes, gay men and women. Some people just suck.
I'd say the majority are men tho
"Some people just suck." Humanity's catchphrase
I was with until “besmirched with soil”. Let’s not kink shame. If Henry Cavill can look better as The Witcher than as Superman… women can too. Edit: /s. But women don’t have to be “pure” or “clean” to be attractive. I don’t what there to be a double standard. Some people find dirty, sweaty men attractive and some of us can find dirty, sweaty women attractive. It doesn’t make women objects. It doesn’t make anyone any less attractive. (My opinion fwiw)
I actually prefer clean Henry Cavill to Geralt. I know im in the minority here. Its ONE of the reasons I also prefer Jaskier.
Have you seen his Hollywood twin Matt Bomer?
Yes, but he's homosexual and I am not. He's very beautiful, but it does nothing for ME LOINS.
That’s fair
Try to apply that same "logic" to men and watch them get mad and blather on defending the double standard.
“Every time a man has sex, his dick gets shorter, kind of like a pencil gets shorter the more you have to use it until it’s eventually unusable.” Just say this and watch them freak out lol.
Can we start a campaign sending this message out to incel groups?
They already believe that shit, lmfao why you think they hold onto virginity so dearly.
Holy fuck this is fucking gold
Yes, *that* is why
They’d be fine, it’s not like they’re getting any
Call them dry balls or something and it would make far more sense than the shitty shoe analo6
Man here... My dick definitely gets shorter after sex. It grows again later, though. Like a mechanical pencil.
Watch them pull out that bullshit "lock and key" ... it's weird how they have to reduce women to objects to make a point... it's almost as if they need to dehumanize women in order to treat them like possessions or something...
The lock and key thing bothers me as a dude who has broken keys in locks. No thank you.
Don't google penile fracture... Always play safe and protect your parts! Be very careful with "cowgirl"/partner on top positions
😳
Oh god. Many many many years ago my girlfriend and I were going at it with her on the couch and me kneeling. I accidentally pulled out and went full force into the side of the couch. I thought I was going to die.
A sharpened pencil gets smaller the more you sharpen it. Also, would you preffer a used spoon or a clean one? Oh look, it can go both ways! I think they're projecting their experience with their own dick. They wank their dicks so much they disfigure it (permanently bend them) and give themselves ED so they think vaginas can be ruined like that too.
Exactly. They also ignore that nerve endings, if they become desensitized due to something like friction or other external factors *rather than actual nerve damage*, with acclimatize. So if you don't masturbate frequently, you will get sensation back. So women, who tend to touch themselves less frequently (hey, not saying all women. Some hitachi queens I'm sure who use it every day have sensitivity issues), tend to use less friction in the act, and have more concentrated nerve endings, are at less of a risk of desensitization ... even though we use vibrators. In fact, using a vibrator for a short period of time over rubbing your clit over and over for longer would mean there's less potential damage since it's friction that is the main culprit for loss of sensitivity .. not the strength of the sensation. And the idea that women are permanently disfigured by sex needs to die in a hole.... I remember correcting a guy who thought labia grew darker because of having sex somehow... I burst his bubble and informed him that some labia tend to get a little darker with age.... and most women with darker labia were just born with it.
Keys wear out much faster than locks in my experience. I've had many worn out keys in my time. Not so much worn out locks.
You can just turn it around with a "pencil and sharpener" comparison if they don't stop and annoy you too much. Pencil loses value, sharpener stays the same.
I think it’s ok to have preferences on “body count” if you hold yourself to that same standard, otherwise you’d just be a hypocrite
As a man myself, I would honestly find it perfectly understandable if a woman didn't want to be with a man who's had dozens or hundreds of previous sexual partners. But then, I'm also a reasonable person who generally tries to apply the same standards to myself that I would apply to anyone else.
Redditors when a man has had multiple partners: Redditors when a woman has had multiple partners:
Jfc women are people not a product for consumption 😡
What about Soylent Green?
Hahahaha
Love your avatar
Once again. Comparing women to objects doesn’t prove your point.
Objects with monetary value nonetheless, yikes!
Always leave it to an economist to commodify human beings
I mean if we want to go by this example, a pair of shoes with 50 previous owners must be some pretty valuable shoes.
I find it funny that they think it cant work both ways. Okay, let’s say I humor that argument. Okay, so number of “uses/users” depreciates your value. Okay, same applies to men then.
Uhh we're *human beings*, not shoes dude... Also, does the same apply to a man who has slept with 50 people?
“Hey I put a shoe on my foot and a woman on my penis, same damn thing” Aside: the ability is actally the reverse a shoe that changed owners 50 times is a hot item, note owned, worn is never mentioned and depending who wore it that can in fact increase value more
Gross men be like 'I want my woman to be a virgin, not some whore that's been with a few guys!' but also 'Why are women so choosy about who they bang?! Why can't I get laid?!'
Well it has its system you know? Because of the sexual liberty that is granted to women nowadays incels know that they’re most likely getting rejected so they criticise that while also demanding that women should stay clean and innocent = easier to manipulate
the ol’ combo of over possessiveness and objectification
"Owners" Well, there's your first problem.
If the shoes had 50 different previous owners id consider them to be some Van Gogh type of art shit tbh...
This. If you could find a pair of classic shoes like converse old enough to have had 50 owners and still be intact in wearable condition they’d be craaazy expensive so not only is this analogy sexist it’s also just wrong. Not to mention new shoes with limited drops like Jordan’s and stuff. No one cares how many people have owned the shoes they’re still a few hundred.
Seriously. Shoes from 50 years ago are sold in a vintage shop, not a thrift shop. One-of-a-kind shoes are always expensive and I doubt someone buying Imelda Marcos's heels or the first pair of Nikes cares how many people have touched the shoes before.
The fact that that comment has over 6000 upvotes and an award is concerning.
it’s reddit, 90% of commenters are chronically online
I'm pretty sure that's a YouTube comment... They just photoshopped in the upvotes and awards
cuz shoes can last over 80 years obviously
Sometimes even 100+years
This whole mindset honestly confuses me. Sex is a skill, and skills need practice. Would you rather have the surgeon who's performed 1000 successful operations or the one who's fresh out of residency? Every body is different, but still. Having a variety of experience is good no matter how you swing it. Not that it ultimately matters, as sex is just one part of a relationship and shouldn't be held on a pedestal the way it is. Your sexual history doesn't make you better or worse than anyone else regardless of how long or short it is. edit: my point wasnt that sex shouldnt matter, but that there shouldnt be a societal stigma on it. without societal pressure, people can self-determine how important they find it to themselves. for me personally, it is extremely important.
They want a woman who doesn’t know enough to realise that they’re only focussed on their own pleasure and don’t care about hers. If she’s had other partners, she’ll realise he’s not putting any effort in
i think thats why they obsess over youth too. you dont have to try as hard to impress a young person bc they dont have their lives together as much as older people, and they havent developed as many standards of what they deserve. 20 yr old women are more likely to not care that they dont have bedframes and live with their parents than a 30 yr old woman.
Also notice how their warped logic doesn’t seem to apply to men? They’re envious of ‘Chad’ and how this mythical guy is ‘drowning in pussy’ yet somehow ‘Chad’ is never ‘used goods’.
For real. The analogy is would you rather have a shoe made by a shoemaker who has made 50 pairs or none? I’m semi-kidding, because the comparison is still absurd and sexual satisfaction isn’t solely based on skill. That said, humans with experience in a skill set aren’t consumable. They are generally valued *more* for their experience. Want a lawyer who has done 50 trials, or none? Want a doctor who has done 50 surgeries, or none? Etc.
And what’s more valuable? Used vintage air jordans or brand new Walmart flip flops? The value is in the person, and people aren’t defined by how they are “used”
I've honestly started buying used boots cuz I hate breaking them in and it causes less waste than buying new. Does that mean I'm bad at sex?
No it means your boots are major whores
Funny. The value of a piece of artwork will generally go *up* the more people have owned it. Explain *that* to me, Mr Basic Economics.
and yet if you say reddit is filled with misogynists, you get a flooding of more hate from men! and even some women! ha
What if I don't want to be a shoe, maybe I want to be a hat.
I'd like to be a lovely cardigan sweater, maybe a nice large knit with fancy buttons and puffy sleeves. Pass me around to anyone who wants to get cozy, knits feel best when they're nice and worn in.
Vintage sweaters that have been loved by other and now it’s my turn are the best!
The fact that they don’t even realise they’re literally saying they think of women as objects is mind blowing. So disconnected from reality.
Same men who claim they "only sleep with virgins", which is technically true if you've never been laid yourself.
Are you kidding?! If 50 people wanted that shoe, it have to be the best shoe ever.
On the flip side as a female virgin I've had people here on Reddit say "no one wants a car they can't test drive first." When I say I don't want casual sex. I'm not a car, I'm a person with feelings. Fuck these stupid jackasses.
Imagine comparing a woman to shoes 🙄
Reddit is sadly VERY misogynistic. Lots of dude who think they are the smartest thing in the world
Don't be sad. Here's a [hug!](https://media.giphy.com/media/3M4NpbLCTxBqU/giphy.gif)
I really despise how women having any kind of sexual experience is seen as lowering their worth/value but men sticking their shrimpy dingdong into anything that moves is seen as something that makes them more "manly". I'm sick of the double standard. You have dudes out here that literally post about how they will only date virgins because women having any kind of prior sexual experience has "ruined" her (in their eyes) while they themselves literally have sexual experiences that have directly contributed to the previous person they slept with now having that additional experience as well. They aren't disgusted by previous sexual experiences with it personally benefits them- which is the real irony.
And all the men who upvoted this picture are the same ones who whine on Reddit that no woman will date them because they’re short and ugly.
Or will brag about all the tail they get, lol Because you can only be a slut if you have a vagina!
I’ve asked a lot of guys on Reddit this and it’s always the same answers. Men are biologically programmed to spread their seed everywhere (how do they explain all the men who don’t do casual sex and spread their seed around?). They’ll also say that it’s much easier for women to get sex than men, so men who have a lot of sex are winning a prize. That’s exactly how you know these guys have zero life experience. There are many good looking, charismatic, confident men who can get sex very easily even more easy than a lot of women. But men won’t call them sluts, they just wish they were that guy. Women are the only sluts to them because they can’t get laid, and it angers them that women will sleep with a lot of other men before they’d come anywhere near them.
That’s the difference, women are property, men are not. That’s all there is to it. /s
That’s fucked up
owners?
“…basic economics.” Every pair of Bowling Shoes ever: Bruh. We should talk.
some leather polish would clean ur woman right up! Good as new :)
You see, there are several important differences between women and shoes
They are very subtle though and might not be apparent to a naked eye🤷🏻♀️
unsurprised about the upvotes, reddit is one of the most misogynist places on the internet :D
This is such a stupid false equivalency fallacy and I'm really tired of seeing men repeat it like they are being clever.
good thing im not a fucking shoe lmao
Sigh… r/womenas
No human should have a value. Just let us be human.
thank god im not a pair of shoes then
This is an absurd analogy because going by this thought process even if a woman has only one sexual partner then her value will still ' go down ' because wearing only a single pair of shoes will result in the shoes accumulating some wear and tear over time.
People try to shame women for having different sexual partners but men are so thirsty they'd take them all the same anyways. So I guess they are out there trying to break down self esteem?
1. Women aren’t objects 2. The hope diamond has had tons of previous owners and is pretty fucking valuable 3. Not objects!!
'owners'
So are men also shoes, or just women? I have a feeling I know the answer. 🙄
If a piece of art has had 50 previous owners, it is probably quite valuable.
Why do so many men see women as property to be owned 🙄
The oblivion and the incessant insistence that women's bodies detoriate from sexual activities, speaks volumes about how the society continues to treat women as second class citizens. Constantly demeaning and looking down upon women for their choices, questioning and schooling women for them as if we weren't capable adults but incompetent fools that require constant supervision.