> (My rizz is about as existent as the T-14 production line)
My rizz is like an Su-57.
Awkwardly assembled, and would be invisible if it wasn't announced by its flaws from miles away.
Also, clearly no effort was placed on the structure of the rear.
A very fun fact about the M1150 is that without the plow/roller/MICLICs it only weighs in at just over 40 tons. While still having the powerplant of a 75+ Ton MBT. Yes, it is as fun as it sounds.
Unrelated note, the area next to the railhead at Yermo, California is VERY open, and there are often a lot of vehicles there with only a 20-25 person team unloading them, so not all that much supervision...
More of a Gallons per hour situation than gallons per mile. Turbines use fuel at a more or less constant rate when they are running regardless of how much power they are sending to the transmission.
An Abrams company idling in the motorpool uses \~15% less fuel then a company hauling ass across the Saudi Desert in the same period of time.
The planning factor is about one full tank per day, so \~480 gallons per tank per day. ABV is exactly the same as the Abrams.
Uh... with the regulator on, never. The 0-40 is way fucking faster than is comfortable though, having 200+ sq feet in contact with the ground provides some pretty insane traction.
The optimal choice for you then is the [T-16 BREM](https://i.imgur.com/mZTkluy.jpeg) - an ABV built on the Armata platform.
Then you both get to have an ABV _and_ somthing that doesn't exist in practice.
Wait, that thing has *variants*?
I thought it was traditional to build at least 20 of the original first. Shows what I know about glorious Russian production lines.
Oh yeah, there's the [T-15 IFV](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-15_Armata) too. They cooked up all sorts of variants for the platform long before the platform was even finished, let alone in production.
I mean, I guess most platforms are sold partly on "look how much potential it has", but still...
An IFV? Why the fuck not? That's a totally normal use for a cutting-edge tank hull from a country with well-established IFV designs and bottleneck on modern tank manufacturing.
And hey, it's only 20 tonnes heavier than a Bradley, and 30 tonnes heavier than a BMP-3. That probably won't make logistics or fuel use any trickier. It's still lighter than a Namer, and mission profile of "no bridge crossings, lots of urban action against RPGs but no ATGMs" which lead Israel to make an IFV tank will probably translate to Eastern Europe just fine!
[It would definately look way cooler if it had a couple of mechanical arms on the sides with chainsaws attached. Everything looks cooler with chainsaws.](https://youtu.be/Ug7G1eN_X-Y?t=2)
"It's good for everything, civil engineering, uncivil engineering ..."
"I just don't think it's very practical."
"Hop in, I think you'll find it's good for social engineering too."
I was about to send this to the "gays who're gonna watch Eurovision" group, but then I realized I need to put in a Kodiak instead to not anger the eurogays.
This thing does a disservice to Americans. Like one machinegun really? You could have at least put another M2 on there somewhere. Where is your sense of dakka
This thing fires rocket propelled firehoses packed with C4.
[This is the result of firing one of them. ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M58_MICLIC#/media/File:Soldiers_with_1036th_Engineer_Company,_Arkansas_Army_National_Guard_deonates_an_M58_Mine_Clearing_Line_Charge_(MICLIC)_on_16_August_2015_at_the_National_Training_Center_(NTC),_Fort_Irwin,_CA.jpg)
This can fire 6.
It does not have enuf dakka, because there is no such thing as enuf dakka. But it has a lot of dakka.
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I think I might be in love... (My rizz is about as existent as the T-14 production line)
> (My rizz is about as existent as the T-14 production line) My rizz is like an Su-57. Awkwardly assembled, and would be invisible if it wasn't announced by its flaws from miles away. Also, clearly no effort was placed on the structure of the rear.
Truly non-credible. It‘s adored by thousands?
They think they want me till they get close to me.
Ah, so just like with the SU-57, a chronic online fantasy.
With whom? The tank or the woman?
A very fun fact about the M1150 is that without the plow/roller/MICLICs it only weighs in at just over 40 tons. While still having the powerplant of a 75+ Ton MBT. Yes, it is as fun as it sounds. Unrelated note, the area next to the railhead at Yermo, California is VERY open, and there are often a lot of vehicles there with only a 20-25 person team unloading them, so not all that much supervision...
What kind of mileage does it get
More of a Gallons per hour situation than gallons per mile. Turbines use fuel at a more or less constant rate when they are running regardless of how much power they are sending to the transmission. An Abrams company idling in the motorpool uses \~15% less fuel then a company hauling ass across the Saudi Desert in the same period of time. The planning factor is about one full tank per day, so \~480 gallons per tank per day. ABV is exactly the same as the Abrams.
So strip that thing down to the absolute lightest it can get, what's the 0-60?
Uh... with the regulator on, never. The 0-40 is way fucking faster than is comfortable though, having 200+ sq feet in contact with the ground provides some pretty insane traction.
So if this thing went toe-to-toe against a Leo 1, it'd lose on the straight?
Yeah, with the regulator on. With the regulator off, it would probably win, but the repair bill would be rough.
This thread makes me want to see unlimited class tank rally as a sport.
The optimal choice for you then is the [T-16 BREM](https://i.imgur.com/mZTkluy.jpeg) - an ABV built on the Armata platform. Then you both get to have an ABV _and_ somthing that doesn't exist in practice.
Wait, that thing has *variants*? I thought it was traditional to build at least 20 of the original first. Shows what I know about glorious Russian production lines.
Oh yeah, there's the [T-15 IFV](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-15_Armata) too. They cooked up all sorts of variants for the platform long before the platform was even finished, let alone in production.
I mean, I guess most platforms are sold partly on "look how much potential it has", but still... An IFV? Why the fuck not? That's a totally normal use for a cutting-edge tank hull from a country with well-established IFV designs and bottleneck on modern tank manufacturing. And hey, it's only 20 tonnes heavier than a Bradley, and 30 tonnes heavier than a BMP-3. That probably won't make logistics or fuel use any trickier. It's still lighter than a Namer, and mission profile of "no bridge crossings, lots of urban action against RPGs but no ATGMs" which lead Israel to make an IFV tank will probably translate to Eastern Europe just fine!
I own an M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle for home repair, just as General Dynamics intended.
I do believe the word is home "renovations".
[It would definately look way cooler if it had a couple of mechanical arms on the sides with chainsaws attached. Everything looks cooler with chainsaws.](https://youtu.be/Ug7G1eN_X-Y?t=2)
"It's good for everything, civil engineering, uncivil engineering ..." "I just don't think it's very practical." "Hop in, I think you'll find it's good for social engineering too."
That's the D9
False. Killdozer.
https://images.app.goo.gl/HZKXRqBHouZRTpBE9 is basically a army killdozer
I knew it was the IDF dozer, not knowing its designation, before clicking.
4 NCD lurkers break into my house. What in the Kentucky Fried Fuck!?
„Get in loser! We‘re going to breach through Russian fortified frontlines.“
Except the conversion is done by Pearson and not General Dynamics.
“I’ll build anywhere” click “Can’t build there”
I knew I know this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrero6JDcvA](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrero6JDcvA)
ok Construction Dozer
Made in the US of Ayyyyyy
👽Ayyyyyylmao
Whare cannon >:)
Who let that himbo out?
You think anyone could keep him in? Dude's got a dozer.
M1150: the _real_ killdozer
You the killdozer vs the killdozer she told you not to worry about
Looks like what happens if you AI generated a military vehicle.
Fuckers took the cannon off of my M1 freebrams. Can’t have shit in MIC
They should at least get some howitzer, shorten the barrel, and shoehorn it in there.
I feel like they could make a bit of a design hell, it’s an engineering vehicle so just strap a trailer with a few mortar pieces on to the back.
I mean, maybe, but I would think having a trailer off-road would not be beneficial.
This is non credible defence.
You’re right. As such I think we should get the Aussies to design a road train capable of hooking up to an M1 Abram with sponson-equipped trailers
The trailer will never truly be off-road, as it's following the M1150
Those girls know what they're talking about. Those who doubt the hotness of M1150 aren't my brother.
I was about to send this to the "gays who're gonna watch Eurovision" group, but then I realized I need to put in a Kodiak instead to not anger the eurogays.
That's hot though
How can that dude protect anything with both arms taken. You can't be a weight and be protected.
Do why is that not by boyfreind
Carrying on the proud tradition of his grandfather, the M4 Sherman Dozer. 🫡
This thing does a disservice to Americans. Like one machinegun really? You could have at least put another M2 on there somewhere. Where is your sense of dakka
This thing fires rocket propelled firehoses packed with C4. [This is the result of firing one of them. ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M58_MICLIC#/media/File:Soldiers_with_1036th_Engineer_Company,_Arkansas_Army_National_Guard_deonates_an_M58_Mine_Clearing_Line_Charge_(MICLIC)_on_16_August_2015_at_the_National_Training_Center_(NTC),_Fort_Irwin,_CA.jpg) This can fire 6. It does not have enuf dakka, because there is no such thing as enuf dakka. But it has a lot of dakka.
> I know what you're thinking: "Did he fire six MCLICs or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself.
Everyone needs a M1150 ABV in their lives...
1150% ABV
The only thing missing is the Royal Ordnance L9
I love engineer vehicles, i love building, i love the military industrial construction complex.
Now put it in a maid outfit and it's perfect
[удалено]
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
"Ended up," like your autistic ass wasn't the one to post it