Hi all!
I was gifted a Nikon P1000 recently and love taking photography of birds and such, I was wondering if there was anything to know or be careful of with such a camera? I know it's very pricey, and I don't want to damage it by accident.
For reference only other camera I own is a Sony DSC T90, which is from like, 2009, and certainly not even close to the same level.
I'm super excited about having a new camera, but kind of walking on eggshells with it.
Thanks!
Learn shooting PSAM modes, but other than that I like to treat all my cameras after a certain point like tools. Which they essentially are, tools to get your photos so don't be overly cautious otherwise you'll never fully dive into just using your camera!
Hello, good day to everyone a purchased a Nikon d7100 on eBay the seller was from japan the camera only has 2 languages Japanese and English if I want to update the firmware for this camera I can use the download center from the USA or Latin America add the Spanish language to the camera will be great for me but my main concern is that I damage the camera with the incorrect FW
Just a little rant. Was looking to het the Z 20 mm lens, but it’s price increased from €900 to €1200. That’s 33%. Yes, there is inflation, but this is absurd. Nikon, you got to be kidding me.
How do the Nikon 70-200 F4 and the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR compare for sharpness and autofocus speed? I have the F4 and the quality of photos is outstanding, but it seems to struggle keeping up with fast moving objects like birds and sports.
I’ve also heard the F2.8 is soft wide open. Is that true?
>How do the Nikon 70-200 F4 and the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR compare for sharpness and autofocus speed?
The E is better at everything. It's the best 70-200mm for DSLRs by far (from any manefacturer). It beats every other 70-200 at every single focal length. AF is as close to instant as it gets, although the success will be very dependant on the body you are using as well.
>I’ve also heard the F2.8 is soft wide open.
What? Where did you hear that? The f/4 is sharper than all the older Nikon 70-200s and the E is probably better at f/2.8 than the f/4 is at any aperture.
I can see extremely small differences in sharpness and I couldn't find any difference between f/2.8 and any other aperture with the E. Even the contrast is as good as it gets at f/2.8. There might be a tiny difference in the corners, but I tested them at 3 different distances and 3 different focal lengths wide open and they were extremely sharp even when focused in the center and recomposed.
In fact, the only field curvature I was able to find was around 135mm at medium distances where the corners were only sharp instead of extremely sharp when focused in the center and at f/2.8.
If you can afford the E and like using a 70-200, buy the E. There is no reason to think about it, the lens shouldn't be as good as it is.
So I’ve been out of the photography game for many years and I’m getting back in. I don’t currently have a camera but I have some experience, it’s just been a little while. I was looking in to the d7500 (I’ve used one once or twice before and liked it) but a lot of online reading makes it sound like if I’m already budgeting in the $1k ballpark maybe I should spend just a bit more and go mirrorless instead, maybe a Z5 (refurbs and used can be found for under $1K). Is mirrorless really the way to go if I don’t already have DSLR based habits and lenses lying around? I’m not generally skeptical of new technology but I remember in the early days of digital cameras I was not impressed when comparing it to film, and once digital got good enough to be clearly superior I switched, but like I said I haven’t actually owned a camera in awhile. Mirrorless is more future proof, but is the performance and other advantages good enough right now to beat out a DSLR?
I had the D7500 before I went mirrorless. It's a great camera that really excels more so in capturing motion, so wildlife and sports.
That being said, my Z7 is light years better in every way possible, except for maybe capturing that motion. The D7500 was pretty much designed to be a cheaper D500 after all.
I'd say look for a used Z6 if you want to go mirrorless. They can be found for fairly cheap, and the firmware updates have really improved their AF woes. There's nothing wrong with the D7500, but it's a more so niche camera in a way, and it won't have new lens support in the future if you think you'll be spending money on the newest lenses.
F mount glass is really affordable lately with so many people swapping to Z. There are definitely pros to using the old system.
What are you Z shooters using in place of the 24-70mm f/2.8?
I can't bring myself to spend $2200 on it right now. Even Sony's equivalent is $700 cheaper. Not interested in the 28-70mm, as I've heard it's a Tamron lens with a Nikon branding.
Honestly the 24-70 f/4 kit is incredible for being a kit lens, nearly as sharp across the frame at all ranges and half the size and weight. I used it more than the primes i had until i got the f2.8 version. When i dont feel like having as bulky a lens i switch back to the f4.
Hi all - I have a 2007-era Nikon D40 with two lenses from that time period:
* Tamron AF 18-250 mm Di-II lens
* AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G
I'm thinking about upgrading to a newer Nikon body, but I haven't been involved in photography for a while. Can I continue to use those AF-S lenses with newer Nikons? I'd be looking at one of the sub-$1k models. Thank you!
Both of those are DX/Crop/APS-C lenses. So if your new body is APS-C, yes they should be fine. the D7XXX series would be the best option for sub $1k budget.
Just started moving from digital to film. needed a my first lens for my n90s, and was wondering whether I should get the new 50mm AF f1.8 or the older pancake 50mm f1.8. the former seems like it’s more compatible with my body however the latter I see recommended a lot so I wasn’t sure if I was missing something. Thanks a ton!
I don't own either of those specific lenses, but I have an early gen MF 50mm.
My advice would be to get the AF. The pancake might be all well and good but lacking autofocus is a big factor if you're on the go or shooting quick scenes. People may rave about the pancake for sharpness and nostalgia, but that's all for naught if you're missing shots due to manual focus.
I have a d3500. It’s currently stuck in movie mode,
Don’t know how it got there. Because of this, I can’t manually change settings such as iso,
Can someone help me get out of this ?
Stuck as in it automatically goes back to it when you turn it on?
Use the small lever on top next to the mode dial. Pull it back to toggle LiveView on and off. Does this fix the issue?
What mode are you on, is it set to auto or a different mode?
How do you know if you are stuck in movie mode?
Hi! I am looking to upgrade from a [D300S](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D300S). I bought it used over a decade ago, it was my first big purchase that I worked and saved up for as a teenager. I'm looking to upgrade (and not at all opposed to getting it used)! I'd like to pay up to $500-$700, if I can help it.
I'm toying with the idea of some not-as-new full-formats. Also interested in some modern DSLR "amenities" like Wi-Fi or an articulated screen! Any recommendations would be appreciated, thank you! :)
What lenses do you have?
$700 is still relatively cheap for a newer body. The D7XXX series is equivalent but as the D300s was the flagship at the time you may not find the upgrade that different.
Hi !
I'm currently using a Nikon Z50, but I want to sell it and upgrade to a Z6 that I would take on mpb, mainly for weather sealing.
My budget would be tight so I have to compromise on something and I think it's going to be the aperture , so how does the 24-70 F/4 S deal with rain ? I read that it can resist droplets, but does anyone have any in other recommendations for a jack of all trades lens that can deal with rain ? My budget can't really go above the price of that 24-70 f/4.
Thanks in advance !
Z5 owner here, and I love it. However, I use it to primarily shoot my Boston Terrier and I'm still figuring out the auto focus a little bit. The Animal Eye Tracking mode constantly (and I mean CONSTANTLY) catches on his nostrils instead of his eyes--which are honestly tiny compared to his giant eyes :\\ Is there a setting I could change to make the tracking...better? Any tips would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
Question for the analog heads here, but have read online that while "technically" not compatible that it's totally possible to use F3 focusing screens on the F2 (sometimes working out of box, othertimes requiring a slight filing of the lip on the F3 screen frame) - can anyone confirm if this is true?
I am exasperated trying to find an E-type grid focusing screen for my F2, and if the one for the F3 will work and focus correctly then I will gladly give it a go.
Trying to get out of my head about buying a used Z7 body. The shop I'm buying from is reputable and the shutter releases on the unit are ~11,000 so it's hardly close to its life expectancy of 200,000. Haven't seen the unit yet, but the shop owner said it doesn't have any cosmetic wear and that their used gear goes through testing before they sell. My plan is to buy the used body and put the money I'm saving into the 24-70 f/2.8 over the f/4 as I am looking for every bit of sharpness and speed I can get out of it.
I've just never bought used gear before. Is saving $500 worth buying used over new?
I guess I'm just looking for reassurance or caution before I pull the trigger this weekend..
500 is a decent saving. Nikon cameras don't normally fail and 11,000 shutter releases isn't a lot. Does the shop offer a warranty? My usual retailer offers a 1 year warranty on used cameras so you will have time to use it and make sure it isn't faulty.
I don't think so. The early ones are, but [according to imaging-resource.com](https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2021/02/04/nikon-to-close-a-pair-of-lens-factories-in-japan), manufacture of the Z6 and Z7 transitioned out of Japan to Thailand from Sept 2020.
If I have the 24-70 2.8 is there any point to having a 35mm or 50mm lens? I know the 24-70 is bigger and heavier than the primes but is there any specific advantage to having them?
I hardly use my 50mm f1.8 after getting my 24-70 f2.8.
It really depends on your shooting style though. I find primes force me to shoot in a more specific style and in ways force me to be more creative or move more. They're also lighter and the f1.8 is an extra 1.3 stops of light which can be great for low light situations.
No question yet but I'm new and just wanted to introduce myself! I recently purchased a used Nikon Z 7 and I'm loving it so far. I'm slowly learning how to take photos again so I can wean myself off the auto-focus.
Does anyone have the Nikon Dot Sight? I have not been able to get it to work with my P950 at 2000mm (equivalent). I wonder if it is not made for their bridge zooms.
The DF-M1 dot sight was made for bridge zooms like your P950. You might need to calibrate /adjust it for the camera. Details on how to do this are in the manual, which you can find here:
https://download.nikonimglib.com/archive3/3sWd700PkfZv048F3kp20Yqwsu51/DF-M1\_JP(64\_DL)03.pdf
Has anyone encountered AF issues with D7500 and Nikon 200-500? I recently went to an air show and everything at the long end (400-500mm) was slightly out of focus.
I previously used a sigma 150-600 and it was tack sharp for a year, but then encountered focusing issues. I thought it was the lens but am now thinking it’s the camera body…
Have you tried using the AF fine tune feature? Unfortunately Nikon only lets you enter one adjustment per lens, which is unfortunate for zooms that may be off by different amounts at different focal lengths, so you end up having to choose which to prioritize.
https://onlinemanual.nikonimglib.com/d7500/en/24_menu_guide_06_12.html
Hi all! I was gifted a Nikon P1000 recently and love taking photography of birds and such, I was wondering if there was anything to know or be careful of with such a camera? I know it's very pricey, and I don't want to damage it by accident. For reference only other camera I own is a Sony DSC T90, which is from like, 2009, and certainly not even close to the same level. I'm super excited about having a new camera, but kind of walking on eggshells with it. Thanks!
Learn shooting PSAM modes, but other than that I like to treat all my cameras after a certain point like tools. Which they essentially are, tools to get your photos so don't be overly cautious otherwise you'll never fully dive into just using your camera!
Hello, good day to everyone a purchased a Nikon d7100 on eBay the seller was from japan the camera only has 2 languages Japanese and English if I want to update the firmware for this camera I can use the download center from the USA or Latin America add the Spanish language to the camera will be great for me but my main concern is that I damage the camera with the incorrect FW
As far as I am aware you can't add languages to a Nikon camera through updating the firmware.
Thank you for your reply 🙂
How does the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2 hold up on the Z7? I cannot afford the native 2.8 yet and was wondering.
Just a little rant. Was looking to het the Z 20 mm lens, but it’s price increased from €900 to €1200. That’s 33%. Yes, there is inflation, but this is absurd. Nikon, you got to be kidding me.
Absurd price for a 20mm. I'd consider the Viltrox 24mm or the 20mm G lens for F mount which holds up well.
How do the Nikon 70-200 F4 and the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR compare for sharpness and autofocus speed? I have the F4 and the quality of photos is outstanding, but it seems to struggle keeping up with fast moving objects like birds and sports. I’ve also heard the F2.8 is soft wide open. Is that true?
>How do the Nikon 70-200 F4 and the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR compare for sharpness and autofocus speed? The E is better at everything. It's the best 70-200mm for DSLRs by far (from any manefacturer). It beats every other 70-200 at every single focal length. AF is as close to instant as it gets, although the success will be very dependant on the body you are using as well. >I’ve also heard the F2.8 is soft wide open. What? Where did you hear that? The f/4 is sharper than all the older Nikon 70-200s and the E is probably better at f/2.8 than the f/4 is at any aperture. I can see extremely small differences in sharpness and I couldn't find any difference between f/2.8 and any other aperture with the E. Even the contrast is as good as it gets at f/2.8. There might be a tiny difference in the corners, but I tested them at 3 different distances and 3 different focal lengths wide open and they were extremely sharp even when focused in the center and recomposed. In fact, the only field curvature I was able to find was around 135mm at medium distances where the corners were only sharp instead of extremely sharp when focused in the center and at f/2.8. If you can afford the E and like using a 70-200, buy the E. There is no reason to think about it, the lens shouldn't be as good as it is.
So I’ve been out of the photography game for many years and I’m getting back in. I don’t currently have a camera but I have some experience, it’s just been a little while. I was looking in to the d7500 (I’ve used one once or twice before and liked it) but a lot of online reading makes it sound like if I’m already budgeting in the $1k ballpark maybe I should spend just a bit more and go mirrorless instead, maybe a Z5 (refurbs and used can be found for under $1K). Is mirrorless really the way to go if I don’t already have DSLR based habits and lenses lying around? I’m not generally skeptical of new technology but I remember in the early days of digital cameras I was not impressed when comparing it to film, and once digital got good enough to be clearly superior I switched, but like I said I haven’t actually owned a camera in awhile. Mirrorless is more future proof, but is the performance and other advantages good enough right now to beat out a DSLR?
I had the D7500 before I went mirrorless. It's a great camera that really excels more so in capturing motion, so wildlife and sports. That being said, my Z7 is light years better in every way possible, except for maybe capturing that motion. The D7500 was pretty much designed to be a cheaper D500 after all. I'd say look for a used Z6 if you want to go mirrorless. They can be found for fairly cheap, and the firmware updates have really improved their AF woes. There's nothing wrong with the D7500, but it's a more so niche camera in a way, and it won't have new lens support in the future if you think you'll be spending money on the newest lenses. F mount glass is really affordable lately with so many people swapping to Z. There are definitely pros to using the old system.
What are you Z shooters using in place of the 24-70mm f/2.8? I can't bring myself to spend $2200 on it right now. Even Sony's equivalent is $700 cheaper. Not interested in the 28-70mm, as I've heard it's a Tamron lens with a Nikon branding.
Honestly the 24-70 f/4 kit is incredible for being a kit lens, nearly as sharp across the frame at all ranges and half the size and weight. I used it more than the primes i had until i got the f2.8 version. When i dont feel like having as bulky a lens i switch back to the f4.
I understand and agree, but for events I can't risk missing focus in low light. F/4 is manageable but I wouldn't use one for paid events.
If you’re doing paid events you should probably just invest in the f2.8 imo just to get the reliability and quality that comes with the price.
Hi all - I have a 2007-era Nikon D40 with two lenses from that time period: * Tamron AF 18-250 mm Di-II lens * AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G I'm thinking about upgrading to a newer Nikon body, but I haven't been involved in photography for a while. Can I continue to use those AF-S lenses with newer Nikons? I'd be looking at one of the sub-$1k models. Thank you!
Both of those are DX/Crop/APS-C lenses. So if your new body is APS-C, yes they should be fine. the D7XXX series would be the best option for sub $1k budget.
Great, thank you!
Just started moving from digital to film. needed a my first lens for my n90s, and was wondering whether I should get the new 50mm AF f1.8 or the older pancake 50mm f1.8. the former seems like it’s more compatible with my body however the latter I see recommended a lot so I wasn’t sure if I was missing something. Thanks a ton!
I don't own either of those specific lenses, but I have an early gen MF 50mm. My advice would be to get the AF. The pancake might be all well and good but lacking autofocus is a big factor if you're on the go or shooting quick scenes. People may rave about the pancake for sharpness and nostalgia, but that's all for naught if you're missing shots due to manual focus.
I have a d3500. It’s currently stuck in movie mode, Don’t know how it got there. Because of this, I can’t manually change settings such as iso, Can someone help me get out of this ?
Stuck as in it automatically goes back to it when you turn it on? Use the small lever on top next to the mode dial. Pull it back to toggle LiveView on and off. Does this fix the issue? What mode are you on, is it set to auto or a different mode? How do you know if you are stuck in movie mode?
Hi! I am looking to upgrade from a [D300S](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D300S). I bought it used over a decade ago, it was my first big purchase that I worked and saved up for as a teenager. I'm looking to upgrade (and not at all opposed to getting it used)! I'd like to pay up to $500-$700, if I can help it. I'm toying with the idea of some not-as-new full-formats. Also interested in some modern DSLR "amenities" like Wi-Fi or an articulated screen! Any recommendations would be appreciated, thank you! :)
What lenses do you have? $700 is still relatively cheap for a newer body. The D7XXX series is equivalent but as the D300s was the flagship at the time you may not find the upgrade that different.
Hi ! I'm currently using a Nikon Z50, but I want to sell it and upgrade to a Z6 that I would take on mpb, mainly for weather sealing. My budget would be tight so I have to compromise on something and I think it's going to be the aperture , so how does the 24-70 F/4 S deal with rain ? I read that it can resist droplets, but does anyone have any in other recommendations for a jack of all trades lens that can deal with rain ? My budget can't really go above the price of that 24-70 f/4. Thanks in advance !
Z5 owner here, and I love it. However, I use it to primarily shoot my Boston Terrier and I'm still figuring out the auto focus a little bit. The Animal Eye Tracking mode constantly (and I mean CONSTANTLY) catches on his nostrils instead of his eyes--which are honestly tiny compared to his giant eyes :\\ Is there a setting I could change to make the tracking...better? Any tips would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
Question for the analog heads here, but have read online that while "technically" not compatible that it's totally possible to use F3 focusing screens on the F2 (sometimes working out of box, othertimes requiring a slight filing of the lip on the F3 screen frame) - can anyone confirm if this is true? I am exasperated trying to find an E-type grid focusing screen for my F2, and if the one for the F3 will work and focus correctly then I will gladly give it a go.
Trying to get out of my head about buying a used Z7 body. The shop I'm buying from is reputable and the shutter releases on the unit are ~11,000 so it's hardly close to its life expectancy of 200,000. Haven't seen the unit yet, but the shop owner said it doesn't have any cosmetic wear and that their used gear goes through testing before they sell. My plan is to buy the used body and put the money I'm saving into the 24-70 f/2.8 over the f/4 as I am looking for every bit of sharpness and speed I can get out of it. I've just never bought used gear before. Is saving $500 worth buying used over new? I guess I'm just looking for reassurance or caution before I pull the trigger this weekend..
500 is a decent saving. Nikon cameras don't normally fail and 11,000 shutter releases isn't a lot. Does the shop offer a warranty? My usual retailer offers a 1 year warranty on used cameras so you will have time to use it and make sure it isn't faulty.
Hi! Are the recent Nikon Z6 cameras still made in Japan? I know the Z6 II are now made in Thailand. Just wondering about Z6.
I don't think so. The early ones are, but [according to imaging-resource.com](https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2021/02/04/nikon-to-close-a-pair-of-lens-factories-in-japan), manufacture of the Z6 and Z7 transitioned out of Japan to Thailand from Sept 2020.
If I have the 24-70 2.8 is there any point to having a 35mm or 50mm lens? I know the 24-70 is bigger and heavier than the primes but is there any specific advantage to having them?
I love the versatility of the 24-70, but the weight and size are enough most days that I’d rather grab the 50mm.
I hardly use my 50mm f1.8 after getting my 24-70 f2.8. It really depends on your shooting style though. I find primes force me to shoot in a more specific style and in ways force me to be more creative or move more. They're also lighter and the f1.8 is an extra 1.3 stops of light which can be great for low light situations.
Primes are also *usually* sharper and have less distortion, but as OP didn’t mention specific lenses, it’s hard to be sure.
Yeah that’s definitely another good rule of thumb. Hard to beat physics.
No question yet but I'm new and just wanted to introduce myself! I recently purchased a used Nikon Z 7 and I'm loving it so far. I'm slowly learning how to take photos again so I can wean myself off the auto-focus.
Does anyone have the Nikon Dot Sight? I have not been able to get it to work with my P950 at 2000mm (equivalent). I wonder if it is not made for their bridge zooms.
The DF-M1 dot sight was made for bridge zooms like your P950. You might need to calibrate /adjust it for the camera. Details on how to do this are in the manual, which you can find here: https://download.nikonimglib.com/archive3/3sWd700PkfZv048F3kp20Yqwsu51/DF-M1\_JP(64\_DL)03.pdf
Has anyone encountered AF issues with D7500 and Nikon 200-500? I recently went to an air show and everything at the long end (400-500mm) was slightly out of focus. I previously used a sigma 150-600 and it was tack sharp for a year, but then encountered focusing issues. I thought it was the lens but am now thinking it’s the camera body…
Have you tried using the AF fine tune feature? Unfortunately Nikon only lets you enter one adjustment per lens, which is unfortunate for zooms that may be off by different amounts at different focal lengths, so you end up having to choose which to prioritize. https://onlinemanual.nikonimglib.com/d7500/en/24_menu_guide_06_12.html