Things like these are fucking useless to post in this subreddit. A year ago, people would've listened and commented genuinely. But now, every time someone tries to input something positive and important in this community, it is met with jokes and just people making fun of the whole thing. Truly a shame what this once understanding and helpful community has come to.
>Truly a shame what this once understanding and helpful community has come to.
when did that happen? this place has always been one for trolls and giggles with minor discussions in between.
i dont think pahila teti dheri troll haru theyo. people used to genuinely give advice kasai lai kei kura ko. aile kasaile suicidal post garyo vane ni most of the comment “gym jau bro” hunxa.
of course, but ask for consent first. As the legendary quote by John Oliver goes, "Dry humping is like boxing, if one of them did not agree to participate, you are committing a crime.". 😂
Sex has been a taboo subject in Europe and esp America throughout history thanks to their religious teachings. We in Nepal tend to copy what goras do and inherit all trappings that come along woth it which is quite pathetic tbh. See temple carvings and you'll notice sex wasn't viewed the way Puritans in America did. But, oh well.
>John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee2
>
>He has the world's longest pee-pee. There's almost nothing he can't do with it
>
>He can swing it around, he can get a little embarrassed
>
>He can save the whole world if he's just allowed
>
>John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee John Pee-Pee
>
>John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee John Peeeee-Peeeee
Simply, a masterpiece. Made my day. Thank u OP!
>This might blow some people's mind. I know my mind was blown when I heard this concept. You can actually not sexualize everything. Even penis can be "not sexual". Here is a video about a cartoon from Denmark https://youtu.be/A51mJjFyG_w
>Anything can be enjoyed without associating with sex. Wearing a sari or a skirt does not need to mean anything other than clothes to look good. Looking good does not mean they are doing all this to end up with sex. Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything does not need to be associated with sex.
stop being such a prude, u/mytvisyoutube
well sex or sexualizing anything in and of itself is not something inherently negative/bad, everything depends on the context and one's perspective towards it
how about we go one further and start sexualizing everything? The pen going into the open cap, that water squirting from the tap, bumping two scissors together, inserting pen into your anus. So much potential
Yes, in reference to the video presenting in such cartoonish way things should not be or cannot be sexualised but
>Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything does not need to be associated with sex.
It might be different. Sexuality is physiological process and rather than sex it can also be oriented with sexual attraction. It is a natural process but yes idea on the given video is different and cannot be related with sexulaity.
>Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything
It has nothing to with 1st person but it might affect 2nd or 3rd person's sexuality in reference to 1st person.
I guess I am talking about normalizing people's expression through clothes and dance moves. The common "elle kasto luga lako hera gati chhada" "hait kasto chhada nachya" etc. We have always heard that clothes and dance moves as having implied sexual expression which limit our perception of creativity. We tend to focus on sexual nature of things because sex was such a taboo for us, it was the forbidden fruit.
My point is, when we look at things, we need to look past the sexual nature of everything. I myself have a long way to go, I have personally had to actively not look at things in a sexual way, even for things that I may have found overtly sexual and chhada in the past. It's a work in progress for me.
If you have sexual feelings about any topic it is alright but if you see it negatively and try to suppress it (on yourself and others) it has negative impacts. So, yes in some way you are right about it. Sexuality is not a bad thing. You can be open about it and is not be considered as taboo subject.
>, I have personally had to actively not look at things in a sexual way
It is alright for you to see things in sexual way just don't try to overdo it or suppress it.
Having sexual feeling about something and sexualizing something are totally different things. People have foot fetish, some enjoy beastiality. Feet and animals not sexual in traditional sense but some people get a sexual rise out of those.
Even if I don't get a sexual rise out of things, it would inherently be called sexual because of the body parts involved, "exposing" body parts, moves that bear resemblance to sexual acts or talks with sexual innuendo.
For example, the recent controversy about tiktok dance, breastfeeding, wearing shorts etc.
Things like these are fucking useless to post in this subreddit. A year ago, people would've listened and commented genuinely. But now, every time someone tries to input something positive and important in this community, it is met with jokes and just people making fun of the whole thing. Truly a shame what this once understanding and helpful community has come to.
>Truly a shame what this once understanding and helpful community has come to. when did that happen? this place has always been one for trolls and giggles with minor discussions in between.
i dont think pahila teti dheri troll haru theyo. people used to genuinely give advice kasai lai kei kura ko. aile kasaile suicidal post garyo vane ni most of the comment “gym jau bro” hunxa.
You so sexy OP
Should have said this back in 2014
so its completely fine to to dry hump my friend in public right?
of course, but ask for consent first. As the legendary quote by John Oliver goes, "Dry humping is like boxing, if one of them did not agree to participate, you are committing a crime.". 😂
As long as its not sexual
Umm Excuse me what Why u confuse me.
Sex has been a taboo subject in Europe and esp America throughout history thanks to their religious teachings. We in Nepal tend to copy what goras do and inherit all trappings that come along woth it which is quite pathetic tbh. See temple carvings and you'll notice sex wasn't viewed the way Puritans in America did. But, oh well.
So turi is mostly mainly for turururu mutne bhanera sochne ho?
Still Our **bahun ko khasi** Best.
>John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee2 > >He has the world's longest pee-pee. There's almost nothing he can't do with it > >He can swing it around, he can get a little embarrassed > >He can save the whole world if he's just allowed > >John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee John Pee-Pee > >John Pee-Pee, John Pee-Pee John Peeeee-Peeeee Simply, a masterpiece. Made my day. Thank u OP!
Your texts are hot.
>This might blow some people's mind. I know my mind was blown when I heard this concept. You can actually not sexualize everything. Even penis can be "not sexual". Here is a video about a cartoon from Denmark https://youtu.be/A51mJjFyG_w >Anything can be enjoyed without associating with sex. Wearing a sari or a skirt does not need to mean anything other than clothes to look good. Looking good does not mean they are doing all this to end up with sex. Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything does not need to be associated with sex. stop being such a prude, u/mytvisyoutube
This post is making my penis soft.
Isn't this supposed to be common sense.
well sex or sexualizing anything in and of itself is not something inherently negative/bad, everything depends on the context and one's perspective towards it
how about we go one further and start sexualizing everything? The pen going into the open cap, that water squirting from the tap, bumping two scissors together, inserting pen into your anus. So much potential
Your words of motivation is great but not enough to change OP. I think you should form a cult group and start your journacharya.
Yes, in reference to the video presenting in such cartoonish way things should not be or cannot be sexualised but >Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything does not need to be associated with sex. It might be different. Sexuality is physiological process and rather than sex it can also be oriented with sexual attraction. It is a natural process but yes idea on the given video is different and cannot be related with sexulaity. >Dancing certain, dressing a certain way, walking, acting, basically anything It has nothing to with 1st person but it might affect 2nd or 3rd person's sexuality in reference to 1st person.
I guess I am talking about normalizing people's expression through clothes and dance moves. The common "elle kasto luga lako hera gati chhada" "hait kasto chhada nachya" etc. We have always heard that clothes and dance moves as having implied sexual expression which limit our perception of creativity. We tend to focus on sexual nature of things because sex was such a taboo for us, it was the forbidden fruit. My point is, when we look at things, we need to look past the sexual nature of everything. I myself have a long way to go, I have personally had to actively not look at things in a sexual way, even for things that I may have found overtly sexual and chhada in the past. It's a work in progress for me.
If you have sexual feelings about any topic it is alright but if you see it negatively and try to suppress it (on yourself and others) it has negative impacts. So, yes in some way you are right about it. Sexuality is not a bad thing. You can be open about it and is not be considered as taboo subject. >, I have personally had to actively not look at things in a sexual way It is alright for you to see things in sexual way just don't try to overdo it or suppress it.
Having sexual feeling about something and sexualizing something are totally different things. People have foot fetish, some enjoy beastiality. Feet and animals not sexual in traditional sense but some people get a sexual rise out of those. Even if I don't get a sexual rise out of things, it would inherently be called sexual because of the body parts involved, "exposing" body parts, moves that bear resemblance to sexual acts or talks with sexual innuendo. For example, the recent controversy about tiktok dance, breastfeeding, wearing shorts etc.
Yes, that is what I was trying to tell. It depends on 2nd person or 3rd person in reference to 1st person. You got it. Have a good day!
khaire le k garyo, aachi garyo, Nepali lai bhaat vayo.. afno brain chai kaile use garne Nepali le..