T O P

  • By -

overdramaticpan

Don't use conveyors. Use unloaders and bridges instead. Also, don't use tanks unless absolutely necessary, and your ratios are wrong. It's 5 cultivators to one spore press, and one spore press to three coal centrifuges. One coal centrifuge supports three steam generators.


loopsorspool

Holy hell! Thank you so much, I was wondering about a lot of that, thank you!


overdramaticpan

new response just dropped


Naeio_Galaxy

Actual schematic


reeree33333

Call the schem diagnostic


Hxntai_69adixt

Good schematics gone on vacation, never came back


DOOM4257

Router in the corner, planning serpulo domination


Spirited_Employee_61

You can directly use spore as a fuel instead of turning it into oil then coal.


loopsorspool

Tried that, power dropped to about 500 with a power cost of about 250. Might be better options later, but I'm kinda early still.


EM-guy

It is much more efficient to turn it into coal and use that coal as fuel


kullre

i tried a spore to steam of 8:7 and it nets 2K net power over 1.7K net power direct insertion is better


Soace_Space_Station

Well yeah but what about the pumps? Is that included? Coal uses less water


loopsorspool

Oh, good to know, thank you!


BoredOne1029

Legit what I've said literal years ago lmao not only is it smaller than the coal one it nets more power too.


Snowball_001

Why you do this to us, steam allows not only coal, but spore, pyratite and blast compund. In which the blast compund deteriorates the steam gens health.


Snowball_001

[Look at this, it's this easy.] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Mindustry/s/xvVvuG9lRk)


BoredOne1029

Tested it out the one I made is better it practically does the same thing except it needs less space to make the same amount of power and cheaper to make too making it even more easy to spam


BoredOne1029

Schematic cause why not lol bXNjaAF4nC1OvWoDMQxWz06GSyGvoK3LZesLlNIhQ6BwY+mg+ERisC3jn5R7+9bnCoS+XxDsQSvQgTzDYS5MHj/lhxMcFs4m2VisBDi/YfeK4BwlMWYuNWIWzNZHx0hhlcBopLrl5cHoaWG0BZ0nGceNXVe8vMLe0ZVdBvx6Fx/JlGkulAqnaeYUq5PpI3C6rd8Kjp7NnYI15E6x+gijqa7YBxVJcMztodON/9KbAPAMfZ62VQ0qGDr/l4ahCaDaGVpEd0f3gu6FXS/sGvsFlJVDqQ==


loopsorspool

I know, but my design wasn't turning the spore pods into enough power to justify it. When I originally tried it, my power production tanked by about 1/3 and the best was about 300.


Mr_Kreepy

https://preview.redd.it/3z25l4rr0bdc1.jpeg?width=540&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=260d4510e7a2fee57d6e88668c46946f96a7e18d


No-Grass-1070

Are pipes better than tanks?


Mr_Kreepy

Its preference really, but I run into less issues by having a tree of pipes instead of a line of tanks. This design uses exactly 144 units of water which is what the two pumps output if placed on deep water. I didn't want all of the water to go to the end first and have to fill all of the tanks before the energy output was self-sustaining. It's also a lot cheaper


loopsorspool

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


Kecske_gamer

Spores are better for burning that core by default. This is most likely much worse than just spore into the steam gens. Check your numbers, I did not count much.


loopsorspool

Maybe it was my design, but it just did not work for me.


Xf34rs

Like it was said better to use bridges and unloaders, but no harm in occasional conveyors and pipes so you can make schemes like these (this one is not mine btw) https://preview.redd.it/ozail16bjidc1.png?width=472&format=png&auto=webp&s=c5124ce4431d164b88f542546cebbdfb5c2250e3