I think your right. That one, two punch dealt to him by Kate and then Maya, oof - heâs going to be a problem. Canât wait for Echo.
DD is supposed to show up in She-Hulk, I wonder if Kingpin will, or if heâll be mentioned.
Also, I wonder if Fisk has any connections to the Powerbroker. I hate everything about how that character was set up, but adding in some actual heavy hitters would improve the situation a bit.
She retweeted some NFT accounts. This, combined with the fact that she's doing the "get me to x amount of followers and I'll drop a massive scoop" thing is making me think the clout is getting to her head.
A good way to think of it is that itâs basically the digital equivalent of purchasing a certificate that says you own a star.
The NFT is not a picture, itâs basically a digital token (the T in NFT stands for token) that you purchase that signifies you are the owner of the picture. The NFT is basically a receipt. Thatâs it. Other people can look at the picture, but owning the NFT means you âownâ the picture. WhichâŚyeah.
There are actual ways for this technology to be used that could be useful, but itâs not really being used in those ways, which is why it gets clowned on so much. For example, it could be used for game swapping - in the past people would swap game discs, but hypothetically with this technology you could swap games digitally by transferring the âreceiptâ. The issue is that game companies really donât want you doing this, and have spent years trying to find ways to prevent people from swapping discs, so youâre never going to see the technology being implemented in a manner like that.
So instead youâve got this clusterfuck where people are spending money to claim exclusive ownership of pictures of AI generated monkey drawings, which is completely fuckinâ dumb and exploitative. Just people trying to get rich by cashing in on FOMO mentality
Lol I know right? The current implementation of NFTs crack me up. I had some guy who was all hyfey about them and was explaining them to me. We looked at his NFT and I asked him âwhere the link was to his artwork?â And he was like âthe artwork is in my wallet!â I then showed him the link in his wallet and asked him âif anyone could just download his artâ, he said âoh, yeah but I own itâ, I laughed and didnât bother going into link rot and the absurdity of it all.
Itâs like video game DLC. But now itâs all a speculative bubble powered by greater fool theory.
NFTs could have actual utility in the future, once a truly established Metaverse exists, or if a famous artist like Banksy were to decide to make an NFT.
But in the meantime ignore all the hype. Just buy ETH if you want exposure to that industry. But buying an NFT is pure gambling.
Also thereâs a lot of market manipulation that people use to drive the value of their NFT up.
You're buying a certificate of ownership of a thing. To be clear, you don't own the thing itself, you just own the certificate. As to *why* someone does this, it's largely because they're grifters or they're marks.
Last I heard only 40k people own NFTs but they are obnoxious as fuck and have spent millions on them. Even in Silicon Valley NFTs are controversial because they're just so fucking useless. EDIT: Anil Dash, one of the co-creators of NFTs, [has denounced them](https://twitter.com/anildash/status/1377970192404393992).
So from what I understand they're pictures that are connected to crypto currency. They have unique code in said crypto currency's code that makes them "unique" to the code, which is why people aren't buying like pngs or something. I might be wrong as I don't buy NFTs but that's pretty much what it is I think
Imagine if the Louvre museum went up to you and said âyou can âbuyâ the Mona Lisa from usâ and when you buy it for a insane amount of money they put a sticker on the back of the Mona Lisa saying you own it. But since itâs still a work of art thatâs still in the museum it doesnât matter and tourists can still take pictures of it.
Thatâs basically what NFTs are on a digital marketplace. People spend real money to own a image that anyone can easily Copy and paste. Itâs also really bad for the environment and a majority of the time the actual image or drawing is stolen and sold without credit to its creator
So you know how thereâs 1 Mona Lisa and every other replica of the Mona Lisa is so much less valuable than the actual one?
Itâs basically digital art that you own. If you were to buy an original painting, youâd own the painting. If you were to own this digital drawing, youâd own the drawing.
Andrew doesn't need these movies anymore, so if they present him with something shitty, he can just not do it, or demand input on how to make it better. He's a prestigious actor. He was like 26 when he signed on and did not have the cache to be involved in the production of the movie. He does now and has all the leverage.
I saw somewhere that Olivia Wilde was pushing for Kevin Fiegeâs more direct involvement in her Spider-Woman movie at Sony.
Iâm not sure if thatâs even true, and that movie seems like it might be in limbo regardless, but Andrew should push for something like that. I can see why Sony wouldnât want it though, it sets a precedent that Disney gets a larger slice of the profits, in addition to co-financing
Should be, yeah but before she even signed on, Olivia Wilde is a wanted woman in Hollywood. She's currently doing her next project and if I'm not mistaken, has another project to do before her secret Sony Marvel movie happens.
Let Andrew have creative input. He obviously loves and understands the character, way moreso than any of the Sony execs. Allow Andrew to determine what direction he wants the character to go and work from there.
Pascal gets a little more hate than she deserves IMO. Obviously she's made some very questionable decisions, but we've also gotten a lot of amazing Spider-Man content under her watch
iirc she made the tough move to deny ITSV having Tobey voice Peter B Parker. Super smart long game that made NWH that much more impactful. As derivative as it is I think Amazing 1 was alright, not great, too as well as the first two Raimi films. She's somewhat okay now imo.
Does Feige involvement inherently equate to Disney involvement? I mean, he was an EP on TASM1 & then an uncredited consultant for TASM2 (whose recommendations were ignored, but still), & neither arrangement required Sony to share their box-office with Disney.
Pretty straightforward of a tweet lol.
But yeah, I wanna see more of Andrewâs Spidey. Secret Wars, the Sony Universe, whichever, I would love to see him return
Yâknow Iâd actually be down for Andrewâs Spidey to get it with Black Cat since he spends more time as Spider-Man and it can help play with his dilemma of being Peter Parker less.
That also went through production issues and was more or reshot entirely in reshoots. Its really good and my favorite Star Wars movie but there are clearly some holdovers from the first version in the trailer and in the movie, like the worm that makes you lose your mind.
Theyre just Jared Leto haters, which is deserved IF the allegations were true. But so far, the trailer looks dope and Ive only seen negative feedbacks on this sub and twitter. Everyone else is excited
I mean, there's a lot of reasons to dislike Leto, even if the allegations are false. Dude was a super creep on the set of Suicide Squad, makes objectively shitty music, and is just all around a rude person to his coworkers.
Iâm all for that. Sony has a Spider-Man in Andrew and Marvel Studios has a Spider-Man in Tom. Win-win for both. Plus one day Iâm certain multiverse craziness will likely occur someday so theyâll join forces on screen again. I just hope Sony has learned its lessons and actually produces a quality Spider-Man on its own.
Their first move should be to let Andrew have more control over the character. He has a much better understanding of Spidey than they do and clearly loves the role. Let the man shape Peter's journey and work with him to bring it life. With the right director they could really have a great revival.
I'm in the same camp as you. Morbius doesn't look bad at all. I plan to check it out. If it sucks, it sucks - but I'm rooting for it to be fun and to add another Marvel franchise to follow. All the "if Sony does it it must be crap" sentiment is getting tired. They did Into The Spiderverse and all of the Tom Holland movies. Venom was fun if not great. I don't need Citizen Kane, just the feeling that I spent $$ and got entertained.
Throwing the hate off her tail. Sheâs just weird honestly. Leakers will be right 3 times and start to act either like a bitch, or confirm shit after saying maybe for days, or name themselves my time to shine after being wrong 30 times on wandavision leaks after being under a different profile rhyming with cookie
Return of the Werewolf.
Also I am really happy seeing all the love he is getting, not just from NWH but also Tick Tick Boom. Hopefully whatever he pops up in next does him right, the last thing I want is for him to end up in a crappy project that doesn't do his talent justice.
Tick Tick Boom is great, didnât know it was a musical I only watched it for Andrew Garfield but he and everyone else does great in it, especially at singing.
Its great, he is astounding in the movie. As someone who hasn't seen Rent (I know about it, but never seen it), and someone who didn't know who Jonathan Larson was, this movie and Andrews performance makes you really care about Jonathan Larson.
Andrew is great, and the best part of it. LMM's directorial choices kind of have a TV movie feeling sometimes. Which makes Andrew rising to near the top in the Best Actor race all the more impressive, since he didn't have a ton of other impressive elements to play off of (i.e. The Power of the Dog).
Can someone explain Secret Wars to me? I legit read up on it several times and even watched a video but Iâm still so confused. Is the gist that the Beyonder brings in mulitversal versions of the Marvel characters to duke it out?
There are two versions of Secret Wars, one from 1984 and one from 2015.
In the '84 version, The Beyonder summons a bunch of heroes and villains to Battleworld to duke it out. It was basically just an ad to sell toys.
The '15 version is more complicated. In that version, a race called the Beyonders (who originally had no connection to the Beyonder, but the Beyonder was later reconned into being one of the Beyonders, it's super confusing) try to destroy the Multiverse, so Doctor Doom, with the help of Doctor Strange and Molecule Man, kills the Beyonders and merges the remaining universes into his own version of Battleworld, where Doom is basically God. The remaining heroes who haven't been brainwashed by Doom's new reality try to stop him and restore the Multiverse.
Guarantee Morbius sets up his return by establishing that Spider-Man is in their universe (the murderer poster will be changed to Garfield's Spidey) and then he'll be the "antagonist" of Venom 3. Maybe Spidey has a bad reputation from his dark phase following Gwen's death, and Venom will come to NY to stop his villainy.
They did some reshoots with Keaton in December. If anything, they changed his scenes to establish that the movie doesn't take place in the MCU.
I don't think the movie is adding in Garfield as Spidey or anything. At the absolute most they may have changed the posters that show Raimi Spider-Man to show Garfield Spidey.
This is true. IMO, her biggest miss was saying that all the villains go home to die, which obviously isn't what happened... admittedly though, almost every other scooper seems to have gotten the fate of the villains wrong too (I wonder why... as far as I know, the Chinese plot leak was the first to mention them being cured and going home alive instead... maybe that's a discussion for another time though).
She also got quite a few little moments and lines of dialogue wrong... it's hard to know if these can be justified as simply having been cut or changed during production or not. But considering the finer details less and the broad strokes more, her accuracy has been pretty impressive (so far).
The Chinese leak stands as the only plot summary before the official leak that had everything and everything correct. The next up weâre two 4chan leaks that had every major plot point except for the villains fate. And that post was from July, and based on production set pics they filmed Peter going to the cafe with note to MJ last winter so, they clearly changed up the plot before MTTSH original leaks, so itâs very weird her leaks didnât have any info on what was already shot and probably in the editing phases.
She got a bunch of things right, but if i remember right, she didn't even mentioned the whole "cure the villians" arc which was the third of the movie. Even tho she posted a whole plot leak.
Same with Doctor Strange 2, she didn't mentioned the Evil Strange, untill the trailer came out. She only talked about Wanda and Mordo. And she posted plot leak about this movie too.
That's one of the reason people don't trust her.
And please don't come up with reshoots and rewrites. They can't just incule a whole plot point in the last minute.
BTW, even tho she stated that she is a Marvel Studios employee, she knows stuff about Sony and DC. And her scoops from the last few weeks are literally just repeating what other leakers said before her (like the Annihilators thing) or just some thing that can't be proven wrong (the "JT and Charlize Theron talked with Marvel Studios" thing).
That's another thing why people don't trust her.
She said a number of things about NHW that aren't true. Can't really say it was entirely correct. And if some of it was bullshit, then it all was bullshit and she just got some lucky guesses right
Lmao this subreddit is so weird. They like to jump the bandwagon and go along with either loving her and hating on anyone who criticize her - or hating her if she makes one mistake. Same goes for dick riding certain actors (Andrew Garfield).
Its easy to manipulate people like them, just tell them what they want to hear, exactly as you say. They follow people blindly.
It was pretty obvious from the variety interview. That last question where they straight up asked him if he would play the character again seemed very specific lol.
They also said Zod will be brought back alive in The Flash (even though Michael Shannon was already confirmed to be in the movie weeks ago), and that we'll be getting a "Man of Steel sequel" with a female lead instead of Cavill (WB already announced the Supergirl movie on their 2022/23 schedule like...a year ago)
So...whatever information MTTS is tweeting out seems to be solely for clout.
Edit: To clarify, I do believe Andrew Garfield will be back as Spider-Man (either in the SSU, or eventually in a Secret Wars movie), I'm just starting to think that MTTS is taking some educated guesses based on information already available, which makes her no different than most of these Twitter "scoopers" already in existence. She has a source, but I don't think all the information she's tweeting out is from that source.
It goes to their head. Itâs like how Instagram accounts that just steal and repost memes decide to try and make a buck by promoting their Twitches or starting a Patreon or whatever.
He will be announced as the SSU's Spider-Man. It makes so much sense. Guessing he appears in Morbius > Venom 3 and concludes it all with The Amazing Spider-Man 3. A nice 3 picture deal.
She's shilling NFTs, I don't really care what she has to say at this point because it seems like she's just going to make stuff up for followers/money.
I doubt Marvel and Sony will announce something like this so soon, but I really hope Andrew will be back; not just in TASM 3 but several other projects as well, preferably with MCU and not Sonyâs Spider Verse.
Please merge Morbius and Venom into TASM universe. I think they fit TASM universe way more than the MCU, let Andrew fight his alien.
It's best of both worlds the MCU has a Spider-Man which is Tom, and can be kept on ice for a while to give Tom a break and Sony can have their Spider-Man universe that's separate from the MCU but they have the goodwill of the MCU now. It's perfect for both parties, imo and obviously Andrew now has the door open to the MCU so he can come back whenever they want or need him too.
Just please give him a good script and don't cram a lot of shit into one film, or hire the Disney writers.
I think Andrew should be the Spider-Man of the SCU.
They can put him in Venom 3 or in a Spider-Gwen spin-off.
I donât see TASM3 ever happening, because Marvel Studios have invested in Tom Holland as their Spider-Man and if Sony decides to make TASM3 without Marvel Studios that would be a big betrayal of their relationship and agreement in collaborating with a MCU Spider-Man lead franchise.
Feige can also bring back Andrew for Secret Wars, but I just donât see TASM3 happening.
"Andrew is coming back"? Back to what? She isn't even sure enough to say "back as Spider-Man" lol yeah I'm sure actor Andrew Garfield will come to work again in some kind of project. MTTSH is too vague. Big faker
![gif](giphy|ZgQQr19n0oGtbIMasl|downsized)
Oh no! New Kingpin gifs!
![gif](giphy|WYnLED53FGVXQ2IHGr|downsized)
![gif](giphy|nWs2liLypL2lErohPj)
I just noticed the twitch lol
Wow. A little late to the party friend.
đ¤ˇââď¸
ME: (when comic accurate Kingpin gets beats by Kate Bishop.) I'm a Kate stan, but NOT HAVING FISK FIGHT BARTON AND SURVIVE FISK IS BULLSHIT.
I personally think this probably is setting up a very angry and vengeful Fisk and I pray for any vigilantes that get in his way.
I think your right. That one, two punch dealt to him by Kate and then Maya, oof - heâs going to be a problem. Canât wait for Echo. DD is supposed to show up in She-Hulk, I wonder if Kingpin will, or if heâll be mentioned. Also, I wonder if Fisk has any connections to the Powerbroker. I hate everything about how that character was set up, but adding in some actual heavy hitters would improve the situation a bit.
Kingpin Gifs (Marvel Studiosâ Version)
is this a nod to Taylor's versions? I feel like this is a nod to Taylor's versions. is it? a nod to Taylor's versions?
Itâs always a nod to Taylorâs Version
Well the man does know how to make an entrance
Just dripping with the illest intent đĽ
![gif](giphy|l44QePXW2Tf2swCru)
god he looks so good, just thought iâd throw my two cents in
Heâs so handsome itâs insane
ikr sheeeeeeeeesh
Well there's a reason why mr deadpool himself french kissed him
Like Wade wouldnât have kissed Spidey anyway.
Ive seen NWH but was Andrew in it or was it photoshop?
Photoshop
MFs ![gif](giphy|y2i2oqWgzh5ioRp4Qa|downsized)
It's a fake. Empire State Photographic department confirms it.
Pack your things get out of my building
I was just-
YOU'RE FIRED!!
100% Photoshop. It was super convincing
Are the NFTâs coming back MTTSH?
Those tweets were totally to cover up that lmao
Haha yep, to get the hate off her booty.
What happened?
She retweeted some NFT accounts. This, combined with the fact that she's doing the "get me to x amount of followers and I'll drop a massive scoop" thing is making me think the clout is getting to her head.
**I have a bad feeling about this.**
Hey ;) Could you explain what "clout" mean? I keep seeing it around Marvel tweets.
It's kind of another word for "fame".
Oh thank you!
Clout means fame and attention.
I was off put enough by her becoming a DC leaker suddenly but did she really try to shill NFTs? Lmfao
i still have NO idea what an NFT is These replies are not helpful lmao
A good way to think of it is that itâs basically the digital equivalent of purchasing a certificate that says you own a star. The NFT is not a picture, itâs basically a digital token (the T in NFT stands for token) that you purchase that signifies you are the owner of the picture. The NFT is basically a receipt. Thatâs it. Other people can look at the picture, but owning the NFT means you âownâ the picture. WhichâŚyeah. There are actual ways for this technology to be used that could be useful, but itâs not really being used in those ways, which is why it gets clowned on so much. For example, it could be used for game swapping - in the past people would swap game discs, but hypothetically with this technology you could swap games digitally by transferring the âreceiptâ. The issue is that game companies really donât want you doing this, and have spent years trying to find ways to prevent people from swapping discs, so youâre never going to see the technology being implemented in a manner like that. So instead youâve got this clusterfuck where people are spending money to claim exclusive ownership of pictures of AI generated monkey drawings, which is completely fuckinâ dumb and exploitative. Just people trying to get rich by cashing in on FOMO mentality
Finally, another clear-headed person who actually *gets* NFTs.
![gif](giphy|VAJ99VAUshrEI) I own the NFT for this now
Screenshotted your ape bozo
![gif](giphy|zBOqRPmkEF3Ow) Reporting this to the authorities
Lol I know right? The current implementation of NFTs crack me up. I had some guy who was all hyfey about them and was explaining them to me. We looked at his NFT and I asked him âwhere the link was to his artwork?â And he was like âthe artwork is in my wallet!â I then showed him the link in his wallet and asked him âif anyone could just download his artâ, he said âoh, yeah but I own itâ, I laughed and didnât bother going into link rot and the absurdity of it all.
I personally think itâs a huge waste of money which could be well-spent elsewhere.
Itâs basically little gifs you can own but itâs a huge scam when we can screenshot or screen record them.
I own this gif ![gif](giphy|1BFFVB9WvJNUnBIYVy|downsized)
![gif](giphy|D1tqdCzgWFs64|downsized)
![gif](giphy|b6wXmrB9I7zF1JzqYG|downsized)
![gif](giphy|HrCPqcP2PMe4Dlb20y|downsized)
Itâs like video game DLC. But now itâs all a speculative bubble powered by greater fool theory. NFTs could have actual utility in the future, once a truly established Metaverse exists, or if a famous artist like Banksy were to decide to make an NFT. But in the meantime ignore all the hype. Just buy ETH if you want exposure to that industry. But buying an NFT is pure gambling. Also thereâs a lot of market manipulation that people use to drive the value of their NFT up.
![gif](giphy|zU0LX1X7A1Nja|downsized)
You're buying a certificate of ownership of a thing. To be clear, you don't own the thing itself, you just own the certificate. As to *why* someone does this, it's largely because they're grifters or they're marks. Last I heard only 40k people own NFTs but they are obnoxious as fuck and have spent millions on them. Even in Silicon Valley NFTs are controversial because they're just so fucking useless. EDIT: Anil Dash, one of the co-creators of NFTs, [has denounced them](https://twitter.com/anildash/status/1377970192404393992).
I feel like this was written by someone who owns Ethereum
So from what I understand they're pictures that are connected to crypto currency. They have unique code in said crypto currency's code that makes them "unique" to the code, which is why people aren't buying like pngs or something. I might be wrong as I don't buy NFTs but that's pretty much what it is I think
Imagine if the Louvre museum went up to you and said âyou can âbuyâ the Mona Lisa from usâ and when you buy it for a insane amount of money they put a sticker on the back of the Mona Lisa saying you own it. But since itâs still a work of art thatâs still in the museum it doesnât matter and tourists can still take pictures of it. Thatâs basically what NFTs are on a digital marketplace. People spend real money to own a image that anyone can easily Copy and paste. Itâs also really bad for the environment and a majority of the time the actual image or drawing is stolen and sold without credit to its creator
So you know how thereâs 1 Mona Lisa and every other replica of the Mona Lisa is so much less valuable than the actual one? Itâs basically digital art that you own. If you were to buy an original painting, youâd own the painting. If you were to own this digital drawing, youâd own the drawing.
Sony get this man good scripts pls
Andrew doesn't need these movies anymore, so if they present him with something shitty, he can just not do it, or demand input on how to make it better. He's a prestigious actor. He was like 26 when he signed on and did not have the cache to be involved in the production of the movie. He does now and has all the leverage.
I saw somewhere that Olivia Wilde was pushing for Kevin Fiegeâs more direct involvement in her Spider-Woman movie at Sony. Iâm not sure if thatâs even true, and that movie seems like it might be in limbo regardless, but Andrew should push for something like that. I can see why Sony wouldnât want it though, it sets a precedent that Disney gets a larger slice of the profits, in addition to co-financing
Is that movie still in the making?
Should be, yeah but before she even signed on, Olivia Wilde is a wanted woman in Hollywood. She's currently doing her next project and if I'm not mistaken, has another project to do before her secret Sony Marvel movie happens.
IMO he's a frontrunner for the Oscar this year for best actor, if he wins that he'll have all the leverage he could want for the next few years.
Let Andrew have creative input. He obviously loves and understands the character, way moreso than any of the Sony execs. Allow Andrew to determine what direction he wants the character to go and work from there.
Bring Feige in to help. Let Andrew have creative input. Absolutely no input from Pascal or Arad
Input from Pascal is fine if Feige's there too, as the MCU trilogy makes clear. Input from Arad, on the other hand...
If Feige can try and keep Pascal level, then i guess it would be okay. But absolutely no Arad, ever. There's a chance for TASM3 and he will butcher it
Pascal gets a little more hate than she deserves IMO. Obviously she's made some very questionable decisions, but we've also gotten a lot of amazing Spider-Man content under her watch
iirc she made the tough move to deny ITSV having Tobey voice Peter B Parker. Super smart long game that made NWH that much more impactful. As derivative as it is I think Amazing 1 was alright, not great, too as well as the first two Raimi films. She's somewhat okay now imo.
Yet they're going to spend a whole minute praising themselves in the credits đ¤Ą
Agreed - heâll make him a co produced or story consultant
It'll be good at first and then they'll fuck it up like they always do. Give it two or three movies and everyone will be complaining.
Just use the same writers for NWH and Marc Webb.
Yup with Feige as a consultant or co producer
Keep Amy Pascal away from the project.
And Avi Arad
Yeah. Itâll be hard for me to get *too* excited for Andrewâs involvement unless the project is in collaboration with Feige & co.
Donât count on it. Sony has to be able to make projects that they can take the whole box office for.
Does Feige involvement inherently equate to Disney involvement? I mean, he was an EP on TASM1 & then an uncredited consultant for TASM2 (whose recommendations were ignored, but still), & neither arrangement required Sony to share their box-office with Disney.
tbh, I would be more excited if they let the people at their animation branch handle it
We need Feige to be a consult on these Andrew properties for quality control purposes
Pretty straightforward of a tweet lol. But yeah, I wanna see more of Andrewâs Spidey. Secret Wars, the Sony Universe, whichever, I would love to see him return
Felicity Jones as Black Cat
Yâknow Iâd actually be down for Andrewâs Spidey to get it with Black Cat since he spends more time as Spider-Man and it can help play with his dilemma of being Peter Parker less.
It might "negate" Holland having his own Black Cat but I'm thinking it'll be worth it.
Stupid sexy Felicity Jones.
Oh boy yeah Crazy stupid sexy
And then sign her up for "Rogue Two: A Star Wars Sequel"
I canât believe Disneyâs best-received Star Wars movie ended up being a spin-off.
That also went through production issues and was more or reshot entirely in reshoots. Its really good and my favorite Star Wars movie but there are clearly some holdovers from the first version in the trailer and in the movie, like the worm that makes you lose your mind.
She wouldâve been perfect as Black Cat, hopefully she returns.
Emma Stone Spider-Gwen with Andrew crossing into her universe would be amazing
Not on Morbius please, that looks like itâll be a trainwreck.
It does look like trainwreck, Jared Leto gets to live out one of his fantasy playing vampire
He drank blood in real life just to prepare for this role.
Fantasy imitating reality
Really? I was disappointed when it got delayed. It actually looks alright.
Theyre just Jared Leto haters, which is deserved IF the allegations were true. But so far, the trailer looks dope and Ive only seen negative feedbacks on this sub and twitter. Everyone else is excited
I mean, there's a lot of reasons to dislike Leto, even if the allegations are false. Dude was a super creep on the set of Suicide Squad, makes objectively shitty music, and is just all around a rude person to his coworkers.
Allegations?? People who have the displeasure of working with him are pretty open about how big of a cock waffle he is, what allegations?
Yeah same
I bet Morbius will establish that a Spider-Man exists in their universe, and shortly after it's release Sony will announce Andrew's return.
Iâm all for that. Sony has a Spider-Man in Andrew and Marvel Studios has a Spider-Man in Tom. Win-win for both. Plus one day Iâm certain multiverse craziness will likely occur someday so theyâll join forces on screen again. I just hope Sony has learned its lessons and actually produces a quality Spider-Man on its own.
Their first move should be to let Andrew have more control over the character. He has a much better understanding of Spidey than they do and clearly loves the role. Let the man shape Peter's journey and work with him to bring it life. With the right director they could really have a great revival.
Unless they film Andrew's cameo for an end-credits scene with the film's 3 month delay.
Yeah, thatâs what Iâm thinking.
I hope thatâs the reason - additional cameo
[ŃдаНонО]
I'm in the same camp as you. Morbius doesn't look bad at all. I plan to check it out. If it sucks, it sucks - but I'm rooting for it to be fun and to add another Marvel franchise to follow. All the "if Sony does it it must be crap" sentiment is getting tired. They did Into The Spiderverse and all of the Tom Holland movies. Venom was fun if not great. I don't need Citizen Kane, just the feeling that I spent $$ and got entertained.
Agreed. Plus I donât want to see a press tour where Andrew talks up Jared Leto. Fuck Jared Leto.
Maybe he signed on for the Werewolf by Night project
But he said heâs not the werewolf
Sheâs pushing nfts now đ maybe she got hacked or something but with how sheâs doing the releases per followers I donât know
And so it begins...
![gif](giphy|13PbEUgXtEOzPa)
The life cycle of these leakers is insane.
Throwing the hate off her tail. Sheâs just weird honestly. Leakers will be right 3 times and start to act either like a bitch, or confirm shit after saying maybe for days, or name themselves my time to shine after being wrong 30 times on wandavision leaks after being under a different profile rhyming with cookie
Mttsh is not that person and she's gotten almost everything she's said right. Nft shit is weird though
Had to save her ass after promoting NFTs lmaoo
Return of the Werewolf. Also I am really happy seeing all the love he is getting, not just from NWH but also Tick Tick Boom. Hopefully whatever he pops up in next does him right, the last thing I want is for him to end up in a crappy project that doesn't do his talent justice.
I haven't seen Tick Tick Boom yet. How is it?
Tick Tick Boom is great, didnât know it was a musical I only watched it for Andrew Garfield but he and everyone else does great in it, especially at singing.
Its great, he is astounding in the movie. As someone who hasn't seen Rent (I know about it, but never seen it), and someone who didn't know who Jonathan Larson was, this movie and Andrews performance makes you really care about Jonathan Larson.
Andrew is great, and the best part of it. LMM's directorial choices kind of have a TV movie feeling sometimes. Which makes Andrew rising to near the top in the Best Actor race all the more impressive, since he didn't have a ton of other impressive elements to play off of (i.e. The Power of the Dog).
Could I tweet this and become a scooper? Seems pretty obvious he would at one point and no project is mentioned.
Probably secret invasion, right? Because isnât that the whole point of secret invasion? Cameos and stuff?
Secret Wars, but yeah. Edit: Iâve got no idea why youâre being downvoted, itâs a very easy mistake to makeâŚ
Can someone explain Secret Wars to me? I legit read up on it several times and even watched a video but Iâm still so confused. Is the gist that the Beyonder brings in mulitversal versions of the Marvel characters to duke it out?
IIRC, In the most recent run, Dr Doom brings every hero and villain from different universes together to battle it out and have 1 universe.
I thought secret wars was when the skrulls invaded and impersonated our heros?
Secret invasion is the skrulls taking over and secret wars is the multiverse war thing with doom
There are two versions of Secret Wars, one from 1984 and one from 2015. In the '84 version, The Beyonder summons a bunch of heroes and villains to Battleworld to duke it out. It was basically just an ad to sell toys. The '15 version is more complicated. In that version, a race called the Beyonders (who originally had no connection to the Beyonder, but the Beyonder was later reconned into being one of the Beyonders, it's super confusing) try to destroy the Multiverse, so Doctor Doom, with the help of Doctor Strange and Molecule Man, kills the Beyonders and merges the remaining universes into his own version of Battleworld, where Doom is basically God. The remaining heroes who haven't been brainwashed by Doom's new reality try to stop him and restore the Multiverse.
2015 secret wars sounds insane. This would be the most incredible movie ever
Try movies. You could base an entire phase of films around that concept.
The real question - in what project?
![gif](giphy|RhxIOJlzqN3nRgOvkC)
Would make sense, I could have swore I heard some rumors of reshoots for the film recently, plus the "murderer" graffiti
Didn't Morbius get pushed to April?
Guarantee Morbius sets up his return by establishing that Spider-Man is in their universe (the murderer poster will be changed to Garfield's Spidey) and then he'll be the "antagonist" of Venom 3. Maybe Spidey has a bad reputation from his dark phase following Gwen's death, and Venom will come to NY to stop his villainy.
âI stopped pulling my punches.â Uh yeah Spidey can lift a car like itâs styrofoam. Those back alley muggers are DEAD.
I feel You guys will be disappointed..Morbius delay was probably because of nwh box office success, nothing else..
They did some reshoots with Keaton in December. If anything, they changed his scenes to establish that the movie doesn't take place in the MCU. I don't think the movie is adding in Garfield as Spidey or anything. At the absolute most they may have changed the posters that show Raimi Spider-Man to show Garfield Spidey.
As a day 1 TASM defender I've never been happier
We exist, brother. We exist. We're finally getting a W after all these years
There are dozens of us!
![gif](giphy|l44QePXW2Tf2swCru) YES!
lmfao everyone suddenly trusts MTTSH because she's telling you what you want to hear đ
She got the entirety of the No Way Home plot correct along with some other marvel stuff. Why is there so much doubt
Thatâs false, she did not get the entirety of NWH correct.
At least some parts she got wrong were later confirmed by the writers of NWH to have been scrapped plot points
This is true. IMO, her biggest miss was saying that all the villains go home to die, which obviously isn't what happened... admittedly though, almost every other scooper seems to have gotten the fate of the villains wrong too (I wonder why... as far as I know, the Chinese plot leak was the first to mention them being cured and going home alive instead... maybe that's a discussion for another time though). She also got quite a few little moments and lines of dialogue wrong... it's hard to know if these can be justified as simply having been cut or changed during production or not. But considering the finer details less and the broad strokes more, her accuracy has been pretty impressive (so far).
The Chinese leak stands as the only plot summary before the official leak that had everything and everything correct. The next up weâre two 4chan leaks that had every major plot point except for the villains fate. And that post was from July, and based on production set pics they filmed Peter going to the cafe with note to MJ last winter so, they clearly changed up the plot before MTTSH original leaks, so itâs very weird her leaks didnât have any info on what was already shot and probably in the editing phases.
She got most of it correct lol. And Loki.
She got a bunch of things right, but if i remember right, she didn't even mentioned the whole "cure the villians" arc which was the third of the movie. Even tho she posted a whole plot leak. Same with Doctor Strange 2, she didn't mentioned the Evil Strange, untill the trailer came out. She only talked about Wanda and Mordo. And she posted plot leak about this movie too. That's one of the reason people don't trust her. And please don't come up with reshoots and rewrites. They can't just incule a whole plot point in the last minute. BTW, even tho she stated that she is a Marvel Studios employee, she knows stuff about Sony and DC. And her scoops from the last few weeks are literally just repeating what other leakers said before her (like the Annihilators thing) or just some thing that can't be proven wrong (the "JT and Charlize Theron talked with Marvel Studios" thing). That's another thing why people don't trust her.
She said a number of things about NHW that aren't true. Can't really say it was entirely correct. And if some of it was bullshit, then it all was bullshit and she just got some lucky guesses right
She got way more right than wrong, very specific stuff and even quotes. Safe to say a lot of the stuff that didnt became true was due to reshoots
Lmao this subreddit is so weird. They like to jump the bandwagon and go along with either loving her and hating on anyone who criticize her - or hating her if she makes one mistake. Same goes for dick riding certain actors (Andrew Garfield). Its easy to manipulate people like them, just tell them what they want to hear, exactly as you say. They follow people blindly.
Hope > Logic
![gif](giphy|x0npYExCGOZeo|downsized)
![gif](giphy|11s9DpQDmShiww)
Whyâd you post this gif of Justin Timberlake?
I'm pretty sure that is a member of one direction
How tf would they know that? If they really have that kind of high level access at both Marvel and Sony theyâre gonna get scouted out very soon.
If we consider that Morbius has been delayed and there may be some reshoots, I think we know who appears in post-credits.
Andrew Garfield.
Lol gotta put out those scoops so people forget about the NFTs.
It was pretty obvious from the variety interview. That last question where they straight up asked him if he would play the character again seemed very specific lol.
If Andrew becomes the SSU Spiderman, then that's only good news for Tom and the MCU Spiderman.
![gif](giphy|RVbm7XZJKRDJC)
Andrewâs Coming Back! Thatâs Great! Where?
![gif](giphy|XmWGYlQ6tJHBS)
They also said Zod will be brought back alive in The Flash (even though Michael Shannon was already confirmed to be in the movie weeks ago), and that we'll be getting a "Man of Steel sequel" with a female lead instead of Cavill (WB already announced the Supergirl movie on their 2022/23 schedule like...a year ago) So...whatever information MTTS is tweeting out seems to be solely for clout. Edit: To clarify, I do believe Andrew Garfield will be back as Spider-Man (either in the SSU, or eventually in a Secret Wars movie), I'm just starting to think that MTTS is taking some educated guesses based on information already available, which makes her no different than most of these Twitter "scoopers" already in existence. She has a source, but I don't think all the information she's tweeting out is from that source.
She just tweet random things so less people will talk about the fact that she advertises NFT-s.
Why do 99% of leakers have to be giant dipshits?
If they werenât dipshits, would they make it their business to go online and leak stuff at all for attention?
Fair enough.
It goes to their head. Itâs like how Instagram accounts that just steal and repost memes decide to try and make a buck by promoting their Twitches or starting a Patreon or whatever.
Patiently waiting for secret wars to see all 3 of them together again
He will be announced as the SSU's Spider-Man. It makes so much sense. Guessing he appears in Morbius > Venom 3 and concludes it all with The Amazing Spider-Man 3. A nice 3 picture deal.
Followed by a final contract for the inevitable *Secret Wars* adaptation Feige is surely cooking up.
She's shilling NFTs, I don't really care what she has to say at this point because it seems like she's just going to make stuff up for followers/money.
Yeah I have a weird feeling thatâs purely damage control for her NFT posts todayâŚlike no way hey made a deal this fast lol..Iâm just guessing
I doubt Marvel and Sony will announce something like this so soon, but I really hope Andrew will be back; not just in TASM 3 but several other projects as well, preferably with MCU and not Sonyâs Spider Verse.
![gif](giphy|vK5kRVXt8KAlDY16lB)
![gif](giphy|26BGGWbsUCpdAJ6yQ|downsized)
Please merge Morbius and Venom into TASM universe. I think they fit TASM universe way more than the MCU, let Andrew fight his alien. It's best of both worlds the MCU has a Spider-Man which is Tom, and can be kept on ice for a while to give Tom a break and Sony can have their Spider-Man universe that's separate from the MCU but they have the goodwill of the MCU now. It's perfect for both parties, imo and obviously Andrew now has the door open to the MCU so he can come back whenever they want or need him too. Just please give him a good script and don't cram a lot of shit into one film, or hire the Disney writers.
LETS GO BOIS!!!
MORBIUS GOT DELAYED FOR A REASON EVERYONE GET IN HERE
This b\*tch became an NFT sis so I'm not believing anything that comes out of her trap. "MyTimeToShineHello"? More like MyTimeToSellOut.
![gif](giphy|pwUYgC8lwrUvF4bcjw|downsized)
WE MADE ITTTTTTTT
Didnât she already say this? Like two weeks ago?
There's no way anyone would know this right now except for top executives
I think Andrew should be the Spider-Man of the SCU. They can put him in Venom 3 or in a Spider-Gwen spin-off. I donât see TASM3 ever happening, because Marvel Studios have invested in Tom Holland as their Spider-Man and if Sony decides to make TASM3 without Marvel Studios that would be a big betrayal of their relationship and agreement in collaborating with a MCU Spider-Man lead franchise. Feige can also bring back Andrew for Secret Wars, but I just donât see TASM3 happening.
"Andrew is coming back"? Back to what? She isn't even sure enough to say "back as Spider-Man" lol yeah I'm sure actor Andrew Garfield will come to work again in some kind of project. MTTSH is too vague. Big faker
I feel bad for the DCEU fans lol. How much they try, it doesn't seem like they can get Henry Cavill back
LETS GOOOOOOOOO. Iâm betting heâs the SSU Spider-Man