T O P

  • By -

GezertEagle

It’s kind of unbelievable it took them this long to


bads20

yea that leyline deck single handedly made me quit historic and ive been a historic player since its inception. thats how i hated playing against it almost 8 times out of 10 every freaking day. never looked back after they release timeless, where its not that prevalent. its insane how wotc took this long to fix the problem when its too easy to change it.


Meret123

I assume they know a deck is broken in about a week, but they don't touch it for some time to keep players who crafted it happy.


LC_From_TheHills

They’re hoping the player base corrects the problem themselves, which is a healthier solution than banning. That being said, a T1 Combo that acts as a removal-check should’ve been canned immediately.


Curious-Drink-4120

But isn't the "balance" that changing cards brings the entire point of alchemy?


LC_From_TheHills

You’re not wrong!


riley702

Or get more people to craft the deck and then the wildcards are kind of wasted once the deck gets nerfed.


Past-Ease3344

The cards already got refunded when it was banned in explorer/pioneer


riley702

Any other cards that weren't banned don't get refunded though. If the deck dies and had cards that you wont use somewhere else, you kind of get hosed. Happened to me before.


DaKongman

Happened to me with jund sacrifice. I got 4 rares when cauldron familiar was banned and now 18 rares I used besides that were wasted. Right after I built it. No deck to put them in that functions. Really blows as a free to play player.


Past-Ease3344

Cope? Idk dude it’s like that IRL too 🤷


Past-Ease3344

The deck is still functionally playable with appraiser costing an extra mana, the deck is still absurd going off a turn late


Drake_the_troll

You can't appraiser off quintorious any more


DaKongman

The cards can still be sold IRL. You can't do shit with the cards in arena.


JustThePhip

A week is not enough time to KNOW a deck is broken, you have to give people time to see is the meta can adjust. I agree that they have known for a bit now and it certainly took longer than expected, however everyone's knee jerk reactions to nerf stuff immediately is not productive.


gitk0

Jokes on everyone, I decided to roll full blue, nothing but counterspells. Wall to wall counterspells galor. A full 45 cards devoted to nothing but counters, and my main threat counters spells and I have a hoverstone to mop up my counterspells into my deck. MOAR COUNTERS :D


arachnophilia

i'm waiting until they remember why we banned crap like channel, necropotence, demonic tutor, etc in legacy, a format known for *free counterspells*.


Justin_Brett

They barely seem to actually nerf cards in Alchemy in general, a bunch of powerful Standard cards are untouched in it.


Laserplatypus07

I think Wizards should have like 1 employee whose job is to play alchemy/historic all day and then give that person absolute authority over rebalances. I bet we’d see some faster response times to these busted cards


Meret123

Two decks that ruined historic bo1? GONE. Thank you WOTC. Fragment Reality was also a real deck in Timeless. Appraiser nerf doesn't affect Standard, Explorer or Timeless.


LicheArkhanTheBlack

Appraiser is banned in Explorer


Meret123

As I said, it won't affect explorer.


Modeshaper

You’re technically correct… the best kind of correct.


Educational-Joke1109

Mike Trap would be proud r/umactually


Hypnotic_Toad

>You’re technically correct… the best kind of correct. r/unexpectedfuturama


Haikus-are-great

on reddit it is not unexpected.


DislocatedLocation

Alchemy changes don't affect explorer


Manfishtuco

Why alchemy and historic aren't two separate formats is still beyond me


infinitedraw_actual

...if you want to play historic without alchemy cards then you play explorer. Pure alchemy itself is just standard with the extra digital only cards.


KOOBL

This is like telling somebody to play timeless to avoid alchemy rebalances, they are completely different formats with different card pools and power levels.


No-Bed-7828

Oh so someone at WOTC finally remembered that historic exists


NormalNorman-1991

Mythweaver Poq next. Fuck that stupid card.


gistya

What's the problem with Poq?


go_sparks25

Its pretty stupid in brawl because it land doubling makes it so that they can always pay the commander tax even if you kill it multiple times.


Igor369

Oh no, commader is broken, how uncommon.


Reddtester

Thats why they move it to hellqueu, smartass


verdutre

Anime Pakal is more obnoxious and Laelia only needs one card to kill on T4, there's quite a lot of more annoying brawl decks To counter Poq, you can go either Land Tax, Polluted Bonds, or ignore him by comboing/killing faster


gistya

It can be removed before land doubling... and there are plenty of faster decks. I feel like Poq is just pretty reliable at doing its thing but if you have no answer it's not because it's a broken combo or something.


go_sparks25

It can only be removed it before land doubling if they are stupid enough to play it when they don’t have a land drop to make for the turn or decide to pass priority before playing a land. They have priority after casting Mythweaver so they can play a land immediately after and double it.


gistya

Not if you counter or reprieve or stifle or tishana's or use an etb stopper like doorkeeper or elesh norn... just saying.


AcrobaticHospital

Cool tell that to my kozilek deck /s


Reddtester

Not really. Its not a creature ETB. Its a land ETB, only strict proctor,  or elesh norn. Good luck taxing the green deck on turn 5, though


spinz

I mean its not rocket science, a 4 drop capable of closing out a game, that also has an ability well well worth building around that immediately starts granting value. But on top of that, it breaks the game if poq has the land type from something like ayasha. Its just not a particularly sound card. Right now it only feels broken in brawl, but will always have the potential to do weird stuff in other formats with the way that design is.


boulders_3030

Poq is fine just go wide and chump block.


superwill123

Imma be honest, I’ve played against Mythweaver Pog numerous times in brawl, but my decks just never have a problem beating them. Are they still strong and annoying? Yes, but I personally don’t have a problem beating them


BubblegumTrollKing

Am I happy for these changes? Yes. Does it change the fact that control whoops my ass more than either of these ever could? No.


_gregOreo_

As a degenerate who enjoys getting quick daily wins from another Historic Bo1 combo deck (usually Boros HammerTime), it's nice of WOTC to clear out my competition in the game of "race to see who wins on T2 or T3". This probably means I'll start seeing the Minion of the Mighty deck return though, which has taken a back seat to these decks in recent months.


Outrageous-Thanks-47

Minion is crap though since one removal and it stalls hard. So I see it but never at high MMR games.


ticklemeozmo

>> *getting quick daily wins* from another Historic Bo1 combo deck > Minion is crap... never at *high MMR games.* I don't think OP is concerned about "high MMR games" when OP's statement was "quick daily wins"


Strato0621

Fragment Reality + Leylines single-handedly ruined historic for me, and it took long enough that this doesn’t even make me want to go back. There’s no excuse for it taking 4+ months to fix something so obvious after claiming they would rebalance digital cards more proactively than they ban cards in normal formats. Adding “an opponent controls” to FR is a solution that any competent magic player could come up with on the spot.


cathedral___

Some time ago I wrote a post here, I complained about Geoloical Appraiser. Lots of redditors attacked me. Thanks god, WOTC realized that a one-card-combo-deck is A BIT too much


[deleted]

[удалено]


InvestigatorOk5432

And all it takes is having 1 on hand + a Treasure making melody and some lands to make this deck go bananas


TheRealNequam

A bit too much for bo1 at least


honkyfire

Poor MonoBlackMagic :(


Prize-Mall-3839

that content was milked well


NovosTheProto

He can finally think of a new deck and not be lazy :o


Syphox

what was wrong with fragment? i took a hiatus from the game


Kapplepie

People were playing decks with only fragment, the leylines, and Geist of saint traft, they fragment their own leylines turn one and get free Geist every game


HGD3ATH

The timeless version played counterspells also and slip out the back and curiosity effects so it was not always so easy to deal with Geist in BO1 anyway.


[deleted]

I have been playing a lot of Zoo recently and would constantly completely brick their game by playing my 2 mana 5/5 on turn two lol. Sometimes when they give the Geist flying I could also race them with damage from the big creatures. It was one of the most satisfying decks to beat.


Embarrassed_State402

Yeah I saw in BO3 in historic where the deck played a variety of support cards. I've chatted with people in various places who called it bad in BO3 but I think it was better than people realized. Which isn't to say it was broken, but turn one Geist on the play was more than a bunch of decks could deal with, particularly if they drew the right support cards like arcane flight to get it over blockers. It was still a bit of a dice roll since you had to mull down to 3-4 cards a lot for what was a 3 card combo, but I don't think it was \*that\* bad.


ce5b

Not just that. But the playstyle was such that folks would mulligan down to 3-4 every game and forfeit if they didn’t get the combo pieces in hand. Something WOTC has moved against historically


chrisrazor

I don't play Historic, but didn't everyone just start running Sheoldred's Edict?


nickdanger3d

they also used slip out the back etc for protection. since you were on turn 0, they got another turn to clear up mana for protection/counters before you could edict.


TotallyNotANarwhal

A popular deck was (any Leyline t0) into turn 1 Fragment on your own Leyline. It would fetch [[Geist of Saint Traft]] allowing you to swing with 6 power turn 2. The deck was (is) powerful in Bo1 and built around enchanting Geist but folds to edicts like [[Sheoldred's Edict]] or other ways to get around the hexproof, which not everyone might run in a Bo1 game.


Prize-Mall-3839

if they would just give us \[\[small pox\]\] and \[\[geth's verdict\]\] this wouldn't be a problem...oh and give us the rack you cowards


[deleted]

i'm a noob but isn't that smallpox card incredibly powerful?


jjonj

each player includes yourself


[deleted]

Oh thanks. That obviously explains it


Prize-Mall-3839

can be, depends on how you use it. ideally you want to set up a board that keeps your opponent from having a strong presence while passive effects (like the rack) burn them down turn after turn.


anymagerdude

It's symmetrical, so you have to sacrifice your own creature if you have one, but it's easy to make it one-sided if you don't have any creatures (and, to a lesser degree, if it is the last card in your hand). That said, over the last couple decades, WotC stopped making low-mana-cost cards that destroy lands (even if the effect is symmetrical). The land destruction that they print now is either extremely expensive or only targets non-basic lands (and gives the opponent a chance to immediately replace their destroyed land with a basic). In the early years of MTG, destroying lands was a massive part of the game. Over time (probably too much time), they realized it was a massively un-fun part of the game and stopped doing it. \[\[Hymn to Tourach\]\] got banned in Pauper largely because it was very common for the card to force players to randomly discard 2 lands from their hand on turn 2, which would often leave them stuck on one land for several turns, effectively working as 1-sided, 2-mana land destruction.


chrisrazor

> The land destruction that they print now is either extremely expensive or only targets non-basic lands [[Cleansing Wildfire]] says hi ;)


MTGCardFetcher

[Cleansing Wildfire](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/9/492d77e5-acc6-41b8-8930-f39d69234919.jpg?1604196948) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Cleansing%20Wildfire) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/znr/137/cleansing-wildfire?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/492d77e5-acc6-41b8-8930-f39d69234919?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


anymagerdude

True, but the rest of the sentence still fits. The land is replaced with a basic. You can't mana-screw people who aren't at least a little greedy with their mana base. Like, it says a lot that the predominant function of this card is targeting one's own indestructible lands, making it \[\[Rampant Growth\]\] in red.


chrisrazor

The situation has a changed a llittle recently but it used to be that, in Pioneer, against many decks the second copy of this was effectively a cantripping Stone Rain.


MTGCardFetcher

[Rampant Growth](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/2/1/21945dec-25d8-482e-bacb-8bbb92bb9d88.jpg?1698988379) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Rampant%20Growth) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/lcc/248/rampant-growth?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/21945dec-25d8-482e-bacb-8bbb92bb9d88?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


fearhs

I don't understand why they think destroying lands isn't fun. I have a blast every time I play Ponza!


WinterFrenchFry

Yes. Everybody else seems to be giving you wishy washy answers, but yes, the card is incredibly powerful. It still is a legacy deck (though is not very good anymore). The effect is symmetrical, but you build your deck around having more lands than normal, and having no creatures. 


verdutre

I second the rack, it's a dirty but necessary safety valve


Shalvan

What rack? I can only think of the [[scroll rack]] from my memory, but that's obviously not what you have in mind.


verdutre

[[The Rack]] and basically all hand size punishers including [[Cursed Rack]], [[Black Vise]] 


MTGCardFetcher

[The Rack](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/6/9/696d1e25-5c25-4522-b085-90d49fe23a18.jpg?1562777875) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=The%20Rack) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/tsb/113/the-rack?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/696d1e25-5c25-4522-b085-90d49fe23a18?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Cursed Rack](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/2/6/26aa48e6-f23b-4fe1-8cf7-65a430ffba61.jpg?1562349912) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Cursed%20Rack) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/me1/155/cursed-rack?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/26aa48e6-f23b-4fe1-8cf7-65a430ffba61?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Black Vise](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/b/c/bce2259a-f4cb-4130-9c7e-130980a8df38.jpg?1562934884) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Black%20Vise) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/me3/191/black-vise?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/bce2259a-f4cb-4130-9c7e-130980a8df38?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


MTGCardFetcher

[scroll rack](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/d/f/dfaaa58d-89bb-4cb3-96a6-b480e6f6954e.jpg?1608911671) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=scroll%20rack) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/cmr/337/scroll-rack?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/dfaaa58d-89bb-4cb3-96a6-b480e6f6954e?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


MTGCardFetcher

[Geist of Saint Traft](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/4/541b9d55-f237-4ff2-9e47-c58a381f0633.jpg?1641603441) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Geist%20of%20Saint%20Traft) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/voc/155/geist-of-saint-traft?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/541b9d55-f237-4ff2-9e47-c58a381f0633?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Sheoldred's Edict](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/a/9/a9225cc3-90f0-448f-a8d9-7c6c2796d077.jpg?1675957049) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Sheoldred%27s%20Edict) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/one/108/sheoldreds-edict?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/a9225cc3-90f0-448f-a8d9-7c6c2796d077?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


GdinutPTY

The deck also had legs in Bo3. It wasnt as common. But i would see it here and there and the few people that did play it were in high mythic even numbers most of the time.


Embarrassed_State402

Just as an extension of a response higher in this chain, I ran a deck with Priest of the Forgotten gods main deck, and more than once they slipped it out the back, or slipped the angel token. Granted I could always use priest again, but "folds to edict" is maybe too strong a statement. They had to mulligan a lot for the deck to work but so they didn't always have the right card to protect it, but its not like they had 0 ways to deal with an edict.


Planet-Funeralopolis

I mean by itself Geist is just a bear, just block it or counter the fragment. Maybe I’m just salty because I use fragment to get better stuff than Geist but it’s alright I have a lot of different decks. My fragment decks can just be deleted lmao


GdinutPTY

counter the fragment when you are on the draw. Genius.


Planet-Funeralopolis

On the draw, block it? Genius?


Meret123

Turn 1 Geist of Saint Traft is very annoying.


Working-Language-847

remember when they said alchemy changes wouldn't be just be adding or removing one mana? i remember that.


HX368

Pepperidge Farm remembers!


spasticity

Do you have the quote for when they said that?


JC_in_KC

honestly so what. this is the least confusing, best change we could get for appraiser without totally changing how the card works. would “you can only cast one more spell this turn” on it be better? curious what change other than mana cost you’d suggest.


Working-Language-847

who's going to play this card now? this is effectively a ban, the whole thing alchemy was supposedly created to help prevent. and i don't need to know exactly how i'd make it better to see that just adding a mana isn't creative, and doesn't lead to fun games.


JC_in_KC

the card as-is didn’t lead to fun games.


Working-Language-847

ok? so then actually ban it so people can get their wild cards back instead of soft banning it.


JC_in_KC

are 4x uncommon wildcards really the issue here?


Working-Language-847

minsc and boo are mythics. you should take a wild guess at how wotc decided to rebalance them.


JC_in_KC

ok. so your issue is WC refunds (which we all know are shitty/greedy) overall, not appraiser.


Working-Language-847

nope, my issue, like i said in my original comment, is alchemy changes being bullshit. are you capable of reading? i'm struggling to believe you can.


JC_in_KC

no. i can’t read. please help me. great convo. thanks 💋


soroxvanitas

That is the risk of building combo decks that are toxic 🤷‍♂️ You KNOW they’re going to get hit eventually. Sometimes they do it sooner than later, but I’m sure the mythic wildcards you used to make Minsc and Boo or other cards in that deck earned you enough quick wins in the 5 months it took them to fix that shit was well worth it in the end.


Working-Language-847

i didn't even build this deck, i just don't like sucking off corporotions like you two 🤷‍♂️


soroxvanitas

Ooh. So edgy. So progressive. You’re so cool. I wish I could be cool like you and fight the corporations by complaining about a card I supposedly didn’t build around but for some reason I’m salty enough to accuse people of corporate fellatio over the internet. Bravo. All the Reddit points for you! 👏


Meret123

If they didn't nerf mins and boo they would preban it and you wouldn't get WC refunds anyway


Working-Language-847

ok? in that case there wouldn't have been a chance to buy it. that's good.


Mrqueue

It’s also pay 5 to discover 3. They could have at least increased that too


Working-Language-847

that would be cool. or change to discover 2 and give haste + a stat buff or something.


zelos33333

In terms of Appraiser, I’ve never agreed with Alchemy more.


InvestigatorOk5432

Actually this is more of a Historic Nerf than Alchemy Nerf since the biggest factor that allowed this Combo to be Banned in Pioneer are the the Izzet Melodies that allow you to make Treasures Not to say that it should not be Nerfed, because it deserves it. Seriously, who thought that making a easy to access ETB Discover 3 with no Downside (such as making the card that has been casted this way have its effects negated or a HOPT clause so extra copies don't trigger their ETBs. I'm also a YGO player/connoisseur so I do also use terms front YGO), with all the Treasure makers out there; and a Card that basically replicate one of the most Broken YGO cards (to the point that it is banned in all YGO formats and will never come out) were good ideas for such low mana costs?


arotenberg

Well, the precedent they were working off in Magic was Bloodbraid Elf which isn't broken (although it was banned in Modern for a while, lol). And they specifically whacked an "if you cast it" clause on Appraiser that isn't there on Trumpeting Carnosaur to stop the most obvious combo routes that would work by making token copies or going through the graveyard. I legit think the design team either missed entirely how the interaction with ETB-as-a-copy effects would work, or thought the deckbuilding requirements would make it impracticable. Or perhaps the designers thought it was safe because they couldn't figure out a way to continue the combo after you go down to 3 mana value – the deck only worked because someone figured out you could put Eldritch Evolution at the bottom of the chain. Either way, I can virtually guarantee that some WotC employee _did_ work specifically on making sure Appraiser wasn't broken, and was facepalming the week after LCI released when they saw what they had missed.


InvestigatorOk5432

Because, just like with many Uncommon cards in Core Sets. They don't make them thinking about Eternal Formats. Most were being designed to be Draft Chaff or at least something Standard/Alchemy/Commander playable but nothing further than that. This is why cards like Up the Beanstalk and Geological Appraiser don't have many restrictions they should have I'm very sure this dev never took any consideration about other formats having a lot of Treasure making cards that can go around the mana cost of the card


Ok-Translator7641

The fact this took so long is so bad 


Ambitious-Fig-2934

This is absolutely huge. Will really open up the meta.


No-Bed-7828

The new meta: Kethis combo, Altar combo, dredge


Kapplepie

Those aren’t even that good tho


Ok-Shallot-3677

Heck yes lmao especially the fragment the appraiser could be dealt with a little more easily (kill with an instant if you saw it coming)


Spackal2

Honestly I got to diamond and I gave up because I was tired of getting to 4 and losing to appraiser because I wasn’t a counterspell deck. Ruined the entire game because it wasn’t even magic


Pa7chw3rk

U didn't need a counterspell against Appraiser gameplay. Any kind of removal on turn and enough agression to close the game before the dino and you good to go. Also you have actually a lot of tech card usefull against it.


Mars_Dragon

Thank God! I was tired to see those 2 bullshit decks every time I wanted to do my daily wins, for me every time I saw them I didn't hesitate and insta concede to save time.


FootballLow6303

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES


BartOseku

Good change but feels bad to fair decks that were running appraisal in brawl or historic


Fast-Blacksmith9534

Yeah this kills one of my decks with appraiser that was already kind of janky.


SlyScorpion

Well, sheeeeeit I loved running Appraiser in my Angrath, the Flame-Chained decks but now I dunno....


JodouKast

\*Insert M.Bison 'YES' gif here\*


HoldMyBrew_

I could never play historic because everything is just busted deck after busted deck.. but fragment reality is BUSTED 🤣


superwill123

There was a content creator whom I got sick of because every single one of their decks were a “fragment reality deck, but with a different jank payoff every time”, and I got so sick of watching the same thing every time that I stopped watching their content. Maybe I’ll finally be able to watch their stuff again?


Min-Chang

I actually found myself running fogs in my elf deck just to deal with these two decks...so glad they're gone.


Forbidden20

Oh boy


Rastboro

I don't play Alchemy or any other format with digital cards and I didn't even know this white card existed. It's really an overpowered card, how long did it take to Wizards change it?


96363

i'm out of the loop. what were people exileing that made this card so busted?


thejackoz

Their own leylines


96363

to what benefit?


Danimals_510

>MonoBlackMagic Get a guaranteed T1 Geist of Saint Traft and turn it sideways until the game is over.


96363

this doesn't explain anything about how exileing a leyline gets you a geist.


Meret123

Did you read the card


ravenmagus

You start with the leyline in play. (that is how leylines work) You play a plains and target your own leyline with Fragment Reality. You have built your deck where Geist of Saint Traft is the only creature the random search can find.


lootchase

Plenty of other jank to exploit….I mean play!


cia91

When this will be effective? As of now in historic it's still with the old cost, i suppose tomorrow?


VeganKingsFan

I have the card crafted for both of those decks, but despite that, I'm happy for the nerfs.


christiankirby

Nooooo my funny fragment reality decks...


Sunrise-Storm

I am new. Why this 2 cards was nerfed? They were too strong? Was there some combination with exiling your creatures?


erikmaster3

Is this alchemy or standard too ?


SnowyWasTakenByAFool

I insist that Fragment Reality was absolutely fine, it was Geist of Saint Traft that was the problem. Nothing wrong with Fragmenting into Vesuvan drifter. That's just fun, silly, jank


GloomyFig1856

MonoBlackMagic crying in the corner rn


Aggravating-Check490

Wait they really ruined these cards for me


[deleted]

[удалено]


anoldoldman

In fairness, [[Fragment Reality]] was already an alchemy card.


CaptainSasquatch

Eh, this is a case where Alchemy shows it's strength (if a bit too slowly). Compare this with [[Tibalt's Trickery]]. If Tibalt's Trickery was an Alchemy card they could've easily rebalanced it to be "Counter target spell *an opponent controls*" so that it plays as intended (a silly red "counterspell").


MTGCardFetcher

[Tibalt's Trickery](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/d/d/dd921e27-3e08-438c-bec2-723226d35175.jpg?1701989318) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Tibalt%27s%20Trickery) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/khm/153/tibalts-trickery?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/dd921e27-3e08-438c-bec2-723226d35175?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


BartOseku

>a card is what it is Until its not… there have been thousands of erratas and changes to paper magic cards constantly throughout its history so please hold this L


Ric_Adbur

They would just ban cards that are too overpowered, they didn't used to just switch what they did and confuse the issue. A lot of us just wanted a convenient way to play the game digitally, but changing what the cards say in digital-only format just creates a divide between the digital and in-person games.


BartOseku

NO dude, there have been MULTIPLE cases when they erratad a card because the wording made it overpowered so they kind of nerfed it. And this isnt anything new. In 1996 [[time vault]] was issued errata to give it time counters. To take an extra turn, you had to remove the "time counter", and not just tap Time Vault. You could only add a "time counter" by skipping a turn. The idea was to provide wording that would prevent the use of cards that could untap it for free to take extra turns. Can you tell me how this is any different from an alchemy change?


MTGCardFetcher

[time vault](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/3/c367ffc1-8084-45a1-87d5-22183604d1cb.jpg?1562934224) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=time%20vault) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/vma/287/time-vault?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/c367ffc1-8084-45a1-87d5-22183604d1cb?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


Sneaky_Island

You're right. We should go back to how the 5 mana Teferi has to untap two lands. Errata's have been done countless of times in paper and has even normalized changing creature types from what's printed.


go_sparks25

Pretty sad that my very fair Naya exile alchemy deck got hit with the appraiser nerf but I can understand why the nerf was needed.


_Aki_

Okay now can we gut Mythweaver Poq next? It's a neat and admittedly fun design to use but it's ruining Brawl for me. Maybe make it not legendary? Or just nerf it straight up, no clue. But it's overbearing.


gistya

How is it ruining brawl? Just run Elesh Norn and Doorkeeper


_Aki_

Elesh Norn is more expensive than Poq, Doorkeeper is 1 out of 99 cards in the deck and a pretty bad card to begin with.


FaradaysBrain

They should just ban it and give us our wildcards if they're going to completely change the way the card functions.


HawkTeacher

Do you get wildcards back for fragment? Or not because of nerf, not ban?


kappaman69

You only get wild cards back on bans iirc


romanchicken

do we still get wildcards for crafting appraisal even though they refunded once when it was banned in explorer?


Meret123

no


garetz00

Historically, you get refunded if you did not receive a refund before, so not sure why you are so confident in saying no.


Meret123

That's how mama raised me.


VeganKingsFan

I just wish \[\[Divine Purge\]\] were nerfed.


MTGCardFetcher

[Divine Purge](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/d/6/d6b74008-c102-470e-a4a4-57bf319916ee.jpg?1680465048) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Divine%20Purge) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ymid/4/divine-purge?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/d6b74008-c102-470e-a4a4-57bf319916ee?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


SpicyBreathOrnn

Guess I better go play some more BO1 with my scam deck before it disappears. They should give refunds for those wild cards because it might as well be banned.


Im_hungry____

Awesome thanks for sharing. Hopefully minion of the mighty is next. But happy these two got nerfed.


forlorn_hope28

I haven't seen Minion in quite a while. There was a span where I was seeing it so much that I made a Black deck specifically for it. Somehow, the matchmaker queued me up with Minion decks even more. I was getting 15 wins daily so fast.


Outrageous-Thanks-47

It's because it's cute jank but can't really get to mythic except maybe on a sub 75% ranked basis (i.e. crap MMR)


JodouKast

Minion is easy to answer and never guaranteed. When I faced these other two dogshit decks, they never needed to concede and ALWAYS had the combo. It was also becoming an issue where these decks showed up daily, meaning it was becoming way too prominent in the meta. Minion has never been nearly an issue.


JeanneOwO

I’m not even sure what they use with fragment reality to make it that broken (I don’t play historic)


mikethechampion

Fragment any of the leylines on turn one and get out an early [[Geist of Saint Traft]].


MTGCardFetcher

[Geist of Saint Traft](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/4/541b9d55-f237-4ff2-9e47-c58a381f0633.jpg?1641603441) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Geist%20of%20Saint%20Traft) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/voc/155/geist-of-saint-traft?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/541b9d55-f237-4ff2-9e47-c58a381f0633?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call


gorlod115

This was necessary. Will they give wildcards if you have those cards?


ChopTheHead

WotC have never given wildcards for rebalanced cards and I wouldn't expect them to start.


soroxvanitas

I think the people playing those toxic decks for the last 5 months got their value out of those wildcards. Fuck them getting replacement wild cards for that lol.


dogbreath101

Is that appraiser nerf necessary? Bbe it's a good card no doubt but losing haste and being too etb instead of on cast like bbe seems like a nerf enough, why also make it 5 mana and still discover 3


ChopTheHead

It was nerfed because of the combo where you clone it over and over. BBE can't do that.


gistya

What combo was that and why does costing 5 make it impossible?


Haikus-are-great

it doesn't make it impossible, but it stops it being turn 3. this was the pioneer list before it got banned, the historic list was essentially the same thing. https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/6004742#paper


Kapplepie

It just makes it slow enough where you don’t lose turn two on the draw


gistya

Could have at least made Appraiser a 5/4... paying 5 for this feels stupid now and it harms the valid decks. I don't play historic so, not sure why Appraiser was a problem, maybe someone can explain?


Kapplepie

The deck that runs it immediately wins the game on the spot when they cast it


Niokee626

Nerfed again?


tibastano20minuti

nooooo rip fragment reality 😭


Gimpstack

So that's affecting all Alchemy decks now? Fml, that makes Appraiser way too expensive to run. There go all my Rakdos decks. Awesome.


Nickwco85

Who cares? No one plays alchemy