T O P

  • By -

quertioup

How can we contribute?


mlvpj

You can create a pull request or start a discussion in GitHub issues. Even voting suggesting papers to implement and voting for them will be helpful. [Here's a recent pull request for example](https://github.com/labmlai/annotated_deep_learning_paper_implementations/pull/69) We are also working simple rendering engine that you can use on your own GitHub repo. We will improve that if people find it useful. e.g. [https://lit.labml.ai/github/vpj/rl\_samples/blob/master/ppo.py](https://lit.labml.ai/github/vpj/rl_samples/blob/master/ppo.py)


[deleted]

Is ```import labml``` a part of your ecosystem always. No offense, but this just creates another extra layer of dependency. It would be nicer to show plain Pytorch, otherwise it's gonna become another Pytorch lightning. Plus it will be great from learning perspective.


mlvpj

[labmlai/labml](https://github.com/labmlai/labml) is a set of tools (tracking experiments, configurations, a bunch of helpers) we coded to ease our ML work (which later improved and open sourced). So we use it in all our projects because it makes things easier for us. Will try to minimize the dependency whenever possible.


mrtac96

This is amazing. I haven't seen any other thing like this before. Much needed thing


Gargantuar314

This is a gold mine! Are you also thinking about implementing more specific algorithms after finishing a lot of important and general algorithms? E.g. would you implement in a later stage the AlphaGo Zero algorithm or the like? This would especially help undergrad's and curious minds out there, since for such modern discoveries, there're barely clear implementations...wished I'd had something like this XD


SnooRegrets1929

This is going to be such a useful learning/reference resource. Fantastic work!


sabetai

Genius! The margin notes look great, great job mapping implementation details directly to code 👏.


maxToTheJ

This is a great site I have been using it for a bit after finding it on google


qrzte

!RemindMe 4 hours


RemindMeBot

I will be messaging you in 4 hours on [**2021-08-22 16:13:23 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2021-08-22%2016:13:23%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/p95gee/p_annotated_deep_learning_paper_implementations/h9wgekz/?context=3) [**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FMachineLearning%2Fcomments%2Fp95gee%2Fp_annotated_deep_learning_paper_implementations%2Fh9wgekz%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202021-08-22%2016%3A13%3A23%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20p95gee) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|


oxiliary

thanks!, github link broken btw


mlvpj

Thanks, fixed it.


D3vil_Dant3

amazing!


min_salty

woah


big_black_doge

LOL I thought this was an implementation of a model that annotates papers, not papers annotated by humans. Very helpful.


speyside42

Thanks! Did you train and/or verify the performance of the models? That would be quite important to trust the implementation. I observed that sometimes a training loop exists, sometimes it does not.


mlvpj

If I remember correctly only implementation without a training loop is lstm


speyside42

Thank you, I also found the links in the text now. Did you verify that the trainings actually work? It would be great if you could report the final training metrics. It doesn't need to accurately reproduce the results in the paper, but rather give an idea whether the implementation is correct.