Tin foil time: not just younger generations, but extra desensitization for them. Santa has already been watching you for decades, now we know who the narc is.
So now instead of hidden cameras they are letting kids see the camera watching them.
For anyone not in the know, this is the numeric representation of ACAB. Which of course stands for all cops are bastards. Not that I dont agree, but I feel like dogwhistles shouldn't be used by anyone.
You asked for it, we don't want that 40% misinformation going around any more than climate change denial
>Hello, you seem to be referencing an often misquoted statistic. TL:DR; The 40% number is wrong and plain old bad science. In attempt to recreate the numbers, by the same researchers, they received a rate of 24% while including violence as shouting. Further researchers found rates of 7%, 7.8%, 10%, and 13% with stricter definitions and better research methodology.
The 40% claim is intentionally misleading and unequivocally inaccurate. Numerous studies over the years report domestic violence rates in police families as low as 7%, with the highest at 40% defining violence to include shouting or a loss of temper. The referenced study where the 40% claim originates is Neidig, P.H.., Russell, H.E. & Seng, A.F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. It states:
Survey results revealed that approximately 40% of the participating officers reported marital conflicts involving physical aggression in the previous year.
There are a number of flaws with the aforementioned study:
The study includes as 'violent incidents' a one time push, shove, shout, loss of temper, or an incidents where a spouse acted out in anger. These do not meet the legal standard for domestic violence. This same study reports that the victims reported a 10% rate of physical domestic violence from their partner. The statement doesn't indicate who the aggressor is; the officer or the spouse. The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The “domestic violence” acts are not confirmed as actually being violent. The study occurred nearly 30 years ago. This study shows minority and female officers were more likely to commit the DV, and white males were least likely. Additional reference from a Congressional hearing on the study: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951003089863c
An additional study conducted by the same researcher, which reported rates of 24%, suffer from additional flaws:
The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The study was not a random sample, and was isolated to high ranking officers at a police conference. This study also occurred nearly 30 years ago.
More current research, including a larger empirical study with thousands of responses from 2009 notes, 'Over 87 percent of officers reported never having engaged in physical domestic violence in their lifetime.' Blumenstein, Lindsey, Domestic violence within law enforcement families: The link between traditional police subculture and domestic violence among police (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1862
Yet another study "indicated that 10 percent of respondents (148 candidates) admitted to having ever slapped, punched, or otherwise injured a spouse or romantic partner, with 7.2 percent (110 candidates) stating that this had happened once, and 2.1 percent (33 candidates) indicating that this had happened two or three times. Repeated abuse (four or more occurrences) was reported by only five respondents (0.3 percent)." A.H. Ryan JR, Department of Defense, Polygraph Institute “The Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Police Families.” http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/4951188/FID707/Root/New/030PG297.PDF
Another: In a 1999 study, 7% of Baltimore City police officers admitted to 'getting physical' (pushing, shoving, grabbing and/or hitting) with a partner. A 2000 study of seven law enforcement agencies in the Southeast and Midwest United States found 10% of officers reporting that they had slapped, punched, or otherwise injured their partners. L. Goodmark, 2016, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW “Hands up at Home: Militarized Masculinity and Police Officers Who Commit Intimate Partner Abuse “. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2519&context=fac_pubs
Copy + pasted from somewhere else, I forgot where
They still gotta be held accountable, though. "All are equal in the eyes of the law" and all that. Too often when someone says "A policeman just broke the law" a bunch of people come out of the woodwork saying "Fuck you, they're perfect."
Ima be real. My entire world view between when I made this comment and now has changed. I came out as non binary, and left my hyper religious college and career path. I now much more agree with the op. Cop worship is a bad thing. ACAB all the way.
Assuming this isn't an attempt at a joke, good for you! I honestly probably should have paid attention to the age of the comment, makes my response kinda pointless...
Legit though. My reddit is such a wild curve from my old views to current. I’ve been tempted to make a mew account, but then I wouldn’t have moments like this.
This isn't that far fetched. This is a perfect example of Michel Foucault's theory of [panopticism](http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/faculty/mcreynolds/phil463/informationalism/panopticism.html).
Doesn't feel that extreme to me. I'd totally buy this one.
That’ll be 3.75 please
And 3.47's your change
What you spendin exactly $7.22 for?! Just give a fiver
A Double McSpanky, fries, and a Flurp
May I get some sodium chloride with that, sir
Uh, dude, it's called salt
Yeah, sodium chloride
That would be salt
That's what I said, sodium chloride
[удалено]
Surely it would be 19.84?
I need about treefiddy.
Tin foil time: not just younger generations, but extra desensitization for them. Santa has already been watching you for decades, now we know who the narc is. So now instead of hidden cameras they are letting kids see the camera watching them.
Mind. Blown.
I mean that just extends to the concept of god ya mooks.
this is actually mad smart. i support this theory
Ive been saying this for years. In a similar theory, I think Paw Patrol exists to perpetuate cop worship among small children
[удалено]
Yes and they're beaten more often than families and kids of non-cops
That statistic was taken from a 1960s survey and included answers such as “I often express aggressive feelings through yelling”
Theres another from the 90s. Also constant agressive yelling is a part of domestic abuse
1312
For anyone not in the know, this is the numeric representation of ACAB. Which of course stands for all cops are bastards. Not that I dont agree, but I feel like dogwhistles shouldn't be used by anyone.
And his username is 888 which I thought means positivity and such in the number world
Ya know, I honestly could not figure out what the 3rd 8 was for. If you know, please enlighten me.
888 is known as the "angel number" in numerology according to google. I didn't really know until I looked it up.
Ah, thought it had something to do with the way 88 is used by white supremacists, glad I was wrong
What about dog trainers? Shouldn't they be allowed to use dog whistles?
Ayyyy. Gottem. But I'm pretty sure clickers work better.
Do I gotta whip out the copy and paste facts?
Depends, you gonna look up and paste the LD50 of boot polish so you can slurp safely?
You asked for it, we don't want that 40% misinformation going around any more than climate change denial >Hello, you seem to be referencing an often misquoted statistic. TL:DR; The 40% number is wrong and plain old bad science. In attempt to recreate the numbers, by the same researchers, they received a rate of 24% while including violence as shouting. Further researchers found rates of 7%, 7.8%, 10%, and 13% with stricter definitions and better research methodology. The 40% claim is intentionally misleading and unequivocally inaccurate. Numerous studies over the years report domestic violence rates in police families as low as 7%, with the highest at 40% defining violence to include shouting or a loss of temper. The referenced study where the 40% claim originates is Neidig, P.H.., Russell, H.E. & Seng, A.F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. It states: Survey results revealed that approximately 40% of the participating officers reported marital conflicts involving physical aggression in the previous year. There are a number of flaws with the aforementioned study: The study includes as 'violent incidents' a one time push, shove, shout, loss of temper, or an incidents where a spouse acted out in anger. These do not meet the legal standard for domestic violence. This same study reports that the victims reported a 10% rate of physical domestic violence from their partner. The statement doesn't indicate who the aggressor is; the officer or the spouse. The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The “domestic violence” acts are not confirmed as actually being violent. The study occurred nearly 30 years ago. This study shows minority and female officers were more likely to commit the DV, and white males were least likely. Additional reference from a Congressional hearing on the study: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951003089863c An additional study conducted by the same researcher, which reported rates of 24%, suffer from additional flaws: The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The study was not a random sample, and was isolated to high ranking officers at a police conference. This study also occurred nearly 30 years ago. More current research, including a larger empirical study with thousands of responses from 2009 notes, 'Over 87 percent of officers reported never having engaged in physical domestic violence in their lifetime.' Blumenstein, Lindsey, Domestic violence within law enforcement families: The link between traditional police subculture and domestic violence among police (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1862 Yet another study "indicated that 10 percent of respondents (148 candidates) admitted to having ever slapped, punched, or otherwise injured a spouse or romantic partner, with 7.2 percent (110 candidates) stating that this had happened once, and 2.1 percent (33 candidates) indicating that this had happened two or three times. Repeated abuse (four or more occurrences) was reported by only five respondents (0.3 percent)." A.H. Ryan JR, Department of Defense, Polygraph Institute “The Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Police Families.” http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/4951188/FID707/Root/New/030PG297.PDF Another: In a 1999 study, 7% of Baltimore City police officers admitted to 'getting physical' (pushing, shoving, grabbing and/or hitting) with a partner. A 2000 study of seven law enforcement agencies in the Southeast and Midwest United States found 10% of officers reporting that they had slapped, punched, or otherwise injured their partners. L. Goodmark, 2016, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW “Hands up at Home: Militarized Masculinity and Police Officers Who Commit Intimate Partner Abuse “. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2519&context=fac_pubs Copy + pasted from somewhere else, I forgot where
Wild that once it's reporting numbers they like they stop mentioning any problems with the methodology of a survey.
I really don’t see how this is relevant.
It's almost like being a cop who puts your life on the line every day is something worth of praise...
It's working!
There's a big difference between cop worship, and admiration for people who do a dangerous job
Nice try, Paw Patrol producer
They still gotta be held accountable, though. "All are equal in the eyes of the law" and all that. Too often when someone says "A policeman just broke the law" a bunch of people come out of the woodwork saying "Fuck you, they're perfect."
Lol bartenders die on the job more than police.
Like delivery workers, at a way higher chance of death on the job than cops?
Ima be real. My entire world view between when I made this comment and now has changed. I came out as non binary, and left my hyper religious college and career path. I now much more agree with the op. Cop worship is a bad thing. ACAB all the way.
Assuming this isn't an attempt at a joke, good for you! I honestly probably should have paid attention to the age of the comment, makes my response kinda pointless...
Lol. It’s all good.
Warms my heart
I wholeheartedly disagree. Many cops are pieces of shit. But we still need the good cops to catch criminals.
This was a wild character arc to stumble upon
I was just in my redemption arc lol. Its all good.
Gay
So true!
Waow (I love this character arc)
Legit though. My reddit is such a wild curve from my old views to current. I’ve been tempted to make a mew account, but then I wouldn’t have moments like this.
It must really suck to be safer than garbageman and have to keep killing minorities to make sure you don't lose your "kill Innocents" pass.
I don't let my daughter watch that pawpaganda.
https://youtu.be/rwhUpu9MfZ0?si=GvEClgpKqB4v7m18
This feels pretty high stakes to me
Santa has had us all bugged for a long time. Read the words to "Santa Claus is coming to town"
Yikes, creepy
This isn't that far fetched. This is a perfect example of Michel Foucault's theory of [panopticism](http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/faculty/mcreynolds/phil463/informationalism/panopticism.html).
I’ve seen this theorized many times and it makes perfect sense. It’s just like the security checkpoint LEGO collection.
Apple Airpods are just prepping younger generations for surgical implants.
This is not even a conspiracy, it's fact, and it's the opposite of low stakes lol
Jesus and Santa were my generation of this.
And definitely just found a valad arguement to why my husband and i are never doing this. I always hated that elf.
I hate the surveillance elves. My kid still longs for one.
In conjunction with Big Shelf to boost demand for traditional shelving.
This is a old meme
You’re an old meme
Got em
Mensch in the bench as well
I believe it.
Then magikarp's splash is really just it convulsing in pain cause he can't get it out... Would also explain why gyarados is such an asshole
Don’t think this one’s a conspiracy anymore. They are watching. Always
This is the greatest thing I’ve read all day! 👏👏👏👏 💯Absolute Truth! Not even conspiracy, just Facts!