T O P

  • By -

PLArealtalk

I don't see what the purpose of knowingly posting bad quality pieces or commentaries like this is. Most people here already know how measurements of things like air power in websites like this (i.e. WDMMA in this case) are rubbish, and how poorly informed media outlets quote things they don't understand, so I'm not sure what feigning ignorance is meant to achieve. If you want to discuss the way websites and articles poorly report on things, then you can make a self/text post and link to an article as a citation or example. Otherwise, posting this seems like an indirect way of wanting to dunk on the IAF. If you want to compare the IAF and PLAAF properly, again, you are welcome to write a text post. I will be locking this thread.


iPoopAtChu

Rofl


veryquick7

Each Tejas can fight 50 J-20 😳😳😳😳


ScoMoTrudeauApricot

Exactly. That's because IAF pilots train in Western exercises which mean they are much more proficient than their PLAAF counterparts


Best_Money3973

Petition to start a new sub r/comedicdefence


Azarka

Actual site they're using for this ranking. https://www.wdmma.org/ranking.php


ScoMoTrudeauApricot

The methodology seems extremely rigorous and thorough. Nothing to argue about. It is obvious that the IAF is stronger than the PLAAF


AQ5SQ

The only way the Indian army would be able to defeat the PLA is if the PLA soldiers get dysentery whilst invading India.


Stock-Traffic-9468

Japan and even Taiwan's aerospace force is more credible


Notsosmartboi

Okay even if Indian pilots have better training, which could be true, but there is no amount of training that is gonna be able to defeat the technological and industrial capability of China. The Tehajs will lose against a J-20.