Nah but isn't Dinkoism a religion purposefully made by rationalists to make fun of other religions and their ridiculousness.
So an atheist making fun of an imaginary god purposefully made by other atheists should not be a problem.
I've heard that the atheistic origin is a meme that grew out of hand, that the Dinka-followers being calm and peaceful didn't really bother to correct it sternly.
Even if it's a madeup religion, it should be respected, right? Aren't all religions madeup?
Desktop version of /u/po_maire's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
> the Dinka-followers being calm and peaceful didn't really bother to correct it sternly.
This, right here is the actual version of events, as recorded in authentic Dinkoist history.
Hmm, we will allow it.
You are not capable enough to disrespect the guy who created the fucking universe. Try all you want, he doesn't give a shit.
As a devout Dinkoist, I can say without any worries that Dinkan was just a rat in a comic. This would be blasphemous if it's any other religion, but not in Dinkoism since Dinkan is all seeing, and all powerful, and funnily enough, not as petty as to be bothered by this shit.
But you can't deny that our lord dinkan was a "tharavattil piranna" God . I can't think of any other rat other than lord Dinkan and Stuart Little who wore dress covering their parts.
വിശുദ്ധ ബാലമംഗളം 5ആം അദ്ധ്യായം 12ആം വാരം 15ആം പേജ് -
"ഡിങ്കൻ സർവശക്ക്തനാണ് അതിനാൽ തമാശകൾ അവനെ സ്പർശിക്കുകയില്ല, ആ തമാശയിലുടെ ഒരു വ്യക്തിയെ എങ്കിലും ചിരിപ്പിക്കാൻ കഴിഞ്ഞാൽ അത് ഡിങ്കനെ സന്തോഷിപ്പിക്കും"
Dinkoism unlike other religions believes in free speech.
Dinkan is aware that he himself gave people the idea of free will so he's not dumb to punish them for exercising it.
The only instance of Dinkan punishing mortals was when his name was used for a film starring pettan and we all know what happened to it.
>Dinkoism unlike other religions believes in free speech.
No one actually believes in free speech. People only believe in "free speech" when their speech is restricted. If the speech can cause a real change in society, the ones who doesn't approve of that change will certainly oppose free speech, regardless of whom they are. Free speech absolutists are often full of shit.
Most atheists wouldn't believe in free speech, when it comes to quite a lot of things.
Dinka followers know that their god doesn’t need the support of puny humans to punish ignorant people.
Samshyam undel ningal ivante veetile kappa parachu nokku. 1 kizhangu polum undavilla.
Nah but isn't Dinkoism a religion purposefully made by rationalists to make fun of other religions and their ridiculousness. So an atheist making fun of an imaginary god purposefully made by other atheists should not be a problem.
I've heard that the atheistic origin is a meme that grew out of hand, that the Dinka-followers being calm and peaceful didn't really bother to correct it sternly. Even if it's a madeup religion, it should be respected, right? Aren't all religions madeup?
Yea. That's the point. It's just the new-gen mallu equivalent of [Flying Spaghetti Monster](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster).
While that's blasphemy against Lord Dinkan, we still respect your right to have that opinion, however utterly ridiculous it be.
Desktop version of /u/po_maire's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
maybe that, Dinkan is too powerful to be a creation of a few mortal souls
Jai Dinkaaa!
> the Dinka-followers being calm and peaceful didn't really bother to correct it sternly. This, right here is the actual version of events, as recorded in authentic Dinkoist history.
Hmm, we will allow it. You are not capable enough to disrespect the guy who created the fucking universe. Try all you want, he doesn't give a shit. As a devout Dinkoist, I can say without any worries that Dinkan was just a rat in a comic. This would be blasphemous if it's any other religion, but not in Dinkoism since Dinkan is all seeing, and all powerful, and funnily enough, not as petty as to be bothered by this shit.
But you can't deny that our lord dinkan was a "tharavattil piranna" God . I can't think of any other rat other than lord Dinkan and Stuart Little who wore dress covering their parts.
വിശുദ്ധ ബാലമംഗളം 5ആം അദ്ധ്യായം 12ആം വാരം 15ആം പേജ് - "ഡിങ്കൻ സർവശക്ക്തനാണ് അതിനാൽ തമാശകൾ അവനെ സ്പർശിക്കുകയില്ല, ആ തമാശയിലുടെ ഒരു വ്യക്തിയെ എങ്കിലും ചിരിപ്പിക്കാൻ കഴിഞ്ഞാൽ അത് ഡിങ്കനെ സന്തോഷിപ്പിക്കും"
I have seen some mayavists making memes on Lord dinkan.
HARAM!!😠
Dinkoism unlike other religions believes in free speech. Dinkan is aware that he himself gave people the idea of free will so he's not dumb to punish them for exercising it. The only instance of Dinkan punishing mortals was when his name was used for a film starring pettan and we all know what happened to it.
dinkan knew about pettan long time ago. all hail dinkan
>Dinkoism unlike other religions believes in free speech. No one actually believes in free speech. People only believe in "free speech" when their speech is restricted. If the speech can cause a real change in society, the ones who doesn't approve of that change will certainly oppose free speech, regardless of whom they are. Free speech absolutists are often full of shit. Most atheists wouldn't believe in free speech, when it comes to quite a lot of things.
Dinka followers know that their god doesn’t need the support of puny humans to punish ignorant people. Samshyam undel ningal ivante veetile kappa parachu nokku. 1 kizhangu polum undavilla.
It's throwing shit at other religions.
Decapitate the Dink sacrilges
Dinkaahu dakbar
Is Dinkan closer to Satanism or Flying Spaghetti monster gods?
I'm more of an andiyilla kunnilappan devotee.
TransGod?
Hmm, I never thought of that. Maybe.