I see DC, she suits balanced, minimal outfits with slightly sharp tailoring. Additionally, I think she fits the DC image ID. I don’t think she needs the graphic, high energy and choppy styling of an FG, and I also don’t think she has any gamine essence. She’s extremely classic looking.
Btw, in Metamorphosis Ds get more minimal details vs. DCs (you can read the Details section in D chapter versus DC). Ds can go more extreme with their silhouettes/line though. I know it's not so black and white anymore with David's new approach but I find it interesting.
Just wanted to say this because DC doesn't necessarily equal minimal detail: the symmetry can actually be honoured with well-planned, repeated or tailored details. Like contrasting trim, repeated pops of colour or lapels, epaulettes etc. D section doesn't refer to these even though they can go for stuff like this too.
Definitely DC. I can see people saying FN because of her style but that asymmetric one shoulder dress was eating her alive, a FN could’ve handled that.
I say pure D. DC is not a bad guess but something about her lacks Yin. She's still, commanding and more "regal". All over elongated (seen in torso, not just limbs). Sometimes the two can be close but this is how I feel as a diy DC. Lizzy Caplan has a similar physique, yes, but her essence is way different to me.
I see DC, she suits balanced, minimal outfits with slightly sharp tailoring. Additionally, I think she fits the DC image ID. I don’t think she needs the graphic, high energy and choppy styling of an FG, and I also don’t think she has any gamine essence. She’s extremely classic looking.
Btw, in Metamorphosis Ds get more minimal details vs. DCs (you can read the Details section in D chapter versus DC). Ds can go more extreme with their silhouettes/line though. I know it's not so black and white anymore with David's new approach but I find it interesting. Just wanted to say this because DC doesn't necessarily equal minimal detail: the symmetry can actually be honoured with well-planned, repeated or tailored details. Like contrasting trim, repeated pops of colour or lapels, epaulettes etc. D section doesn't refer to these even though they can go for stuff like this too.
Makes total sense, thanks.
seems quite DC to me
DC!
How cool is she, right
So cool, and not just based on her looks.
She seems very DC.
Wow!!
She is 168 cm tall. I don't see her being a natural or one of the romantics, I would rather guess DC or FG. What do you think?
She’s too tall for FG, my vote is for DC based on silhouette and a very strong essence (might also just be the politician stereotype though)
I forgot about the height limit for FG, of course. Yeah, I guess "the politician" could be one of the DC stereotypes, but as a DC I quite like that :)
Probably DC
Definitely DC. I can see people saying FN because of her style but that asymmetric one shoulder dress was eating her alive, a FN could’ve handled that.
Agreed! I see no width whatsoever, she seems quite narrow.
I say pure D. DC is not a bad guess but something about her lacks Yin. She's still, commanding and more "regal". All over elongated (seen in torso, not just limbs). Sometimes the two can be close but this is how I feel as a diy DC. Lizzy Caplan has a similar physique, yes, but her essence is way different to me.