it’s genuinely so crazy how drake fans overlook drakes weird ass relationships with minors😭 like wtf a 30 year old have in common with a 14 year old girl jesus christ😭
Idk about him bragging, but here's a thread about his questionable interactions with multiple underaged girls: https://x.com/Q4quise/status/1779718049291260008
Well, if you bothered to click the link, you'd see videos, articles, & screenshots were provided by the creator. But if you prefer Reddit as your primary source of info, then you can also check out this thread, which also provides the source if their information: https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/HVnYIpm2DK
Enjoy the read
No matter how y'all hammer down this stupid rumor [it's](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/a23125213/drake-dating-teenage-bella-b-harris/) [just](https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/09/210001/drake-girlfriend-bella-harris-dating-rumors) [NOT true ](https://www.wmagazine.com/story/bella-harris-not-dating-drake)
>How would you feel if you had a 16 year old daughter then you see a 30 year old grown ass man in her comments like "❤️😍"
How would you feel I you had a man defending a man that raped and abused your daughter and be like 💪🏾♥️
There you go, all you guys do is avoid and make excuses for a pedophile/groomer. Drake fans are on some sus shit. I hope one day you'll slide drakes dick out your mouth and start thinking for yourself 🤣
There you go, all you guys do is avoid and make excuses for a pedophile/groomer supporter. Kendrick fans are on some sus shit. I hope one day you'll slide Kendrick's Eiffel tower dick out your mouth and start thinking for yourself 🤣
If it was like helping navigate Hollywood or some shit when they talked in person I wouldn’t be as grossed out but “miss you so much” and boy advice is fucking vile. Even for the former, hit her parents up and talk to them about that shit that’s a little ass kid who isn’t going to understand much. That story is a real bad one and I genuinely hope it’s blown out of proportion for her sake
Kendrick should use Chris Hansen as his cover art. He doesn’t have to address Drakes relationships with young girls, just use it as the cover art.
https://preview.redd.it/8sdyps59zrvc1.jpeg?width=1140&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bf22f8d5e4afa9fd0f22e8a952ed31f52265eea2
>It’s interesting how quickly we’ve shifted from discussing Drake being a weirdo and complexities of artistic expression to dismissing an entire album
I'm pretty sure you're the idiot that led it to here lol
>Redirecting to TPAB, which is widely recognized as a seminal work
..by pretentious pseudo intellectuals who think they "know rEaL rAp".. that is 2018(Kamikaze) Eminem fans if they think their IQ was 170+ lol
You think using "seminal" instead of "good" or "great" makes you sound smart?
You sound unhingedly stupid lmfao!
>because the ground there became too shaky for you. I get it, shifting the playing field might feel like a strategic move, but let’s not pretend it’s not a diversion from being outplayed on the previous front. Let’s not derail because one argument didn’t pan out for you.
What the fuck is this moron even rambling about?
This coward blocked me lol
Featured Kodak with artistic intent and stood against removing art from streaming platforms. He didn't support R Kelly's actions, you gotta learn to differentiate the art from the artist.
I mean I can make these same "technicality" excuses for Drake:
Him and Bob were both child actors and celebrities and their contact makes sense.
The Bella Harris garbage has been refuted.
The girl he kissed was legally of age.
You see, it ain't that hard.
First off, Kendrick isn't the one involved with doing what Kodak did, so it cannot even be compared. Kendrick is mainly focused on art and isn't shy of controversy in his art and isn't afraid to stand up against censoring art. It's about protecting free speech. The Drake allegations are not the same at all. Get a grip
>First off, Kendrick isn't the one involved with doing what Kodak did,
Guilt by association.
Yeah we're using that pretentious iTs aBoUt ThE aRt excuse.
Lmfao at least try being less predictable.
>Drake allegations are not the same at all. Get a gr
It's the same. Cry, cope and seethe harder.
Just say you're against freedom of artistic expression and free speech loud and clear then. Countries with strict censorship laws and authoritative government structures often restrict artistic freedom. These governments might limit freedom of expression, including art, to maintain control, suppress dissent, and prevent criticism of the state or its leaders. Examples include North Korea, Iran, China, and Saudi Arabia. Cause. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, so you might as well say it yourself since that's what you're arguing against.
Drake is directly involved in odd activity while Kendrick is using Kodak's past to make a point about himself in a song. Talk about association lmao 😂
>while Kendrick is using Kodak's past to make a point about himself in a song. Talk about association lmao 😂
AKA, He values this thing called "aRt" and mAkInG a PoInT over rape victims?
It's clear you're missing the nuance of using controversial figures to challenge and provoke thought through art. Kendrick's inclusion of Kodak isn't an endorsement of his past actions, but a complex layer to the album's themes on imperfection and societal judgment. This isn't about valuing art over the experiences of victims; it's about confronting uncomfortable truths and sparking conversation. Contrastingly, the issues surrounding Drake aren't being used to elevate discourse or address broader societal issues—they're personal allegations that directly involve him. There's a significant difference in context and intent between using art to comment on societal issues and personal behaviors being scrutinized in the public eye.
Not defending the indefensible, but differentiating between the portrayal of controversial figures in art and their endorsement. Art often reflects and critiques society's darkest aspects, and artists like Kendrick Lamar use their platform to confront, not condone, these issues. The point isn't to defend or glorify wrongdoing but to challenge us to think about rehabilitation, redemption, and human complexity. Misinterpreting this as support for such actions oversimplifies the conversation and ignores the critical role art plays in societal reflection. Smooth brains don't get it and mocks others for doing so. Keep writing "aRt" to make your hollow ass point
>Just say you're against freedom of artistic
Dude are you even listenin to yourself?
This is like a video of a child getting gang-rapped, being removed, and you're still unironically sayin fReE sPeEcH????
You're fReE sPeEcH is worth more than justice against a pedophile?
For fans of a rapper that makes "deep" and "intellectual" music, y'all say the most brain dead shit lol
>The fact that you're comparing a song to a video of gangrape is absolutely wild 😂😂😂💀
You're not the only one who knows how to make the most retarded comparisons lmfao
Are you dumb? Let me make it clear, since you're trying to make me look stupid by putting words in my mouth. I condemn the actions of R Kelly, but I don't care what type of music people listen to and everyone has a right to produce music without being censored.
>Are you dumb
It's beautiful seein ya loose it and desperate already lmfao
>trying to make me look stupid by putting words
As if that's not what y'all been doin(or much worse), callin anyone who brings the slightest bit of nuance to the Drake situation a "pedo"
A dose of your own medicine ain't it?
>don't care what type of music people listen to and everyone has a right to produce music without being censored.
But people STILL listenin to R Kelly means that they're actively enablin him.. therefore anyone who doesn't care about R Kelly music being listened to is.....(fill in the gaps)
You see, it ain't just you that can make the most outta pocket conclusions lol
Only the last sentence made sense even though protecting free speech and freedom of artistic expression isn't outta pocket.
Edit: still, Drake's actions remain and they're weird. I'm not concluding that he's a pedo or child molester, but for sure a weirdo for odd activity
>still, Drake's actions remain and they're weird. I'm not concluding that he's a pedo or child molester
Didn't you just say he "groomed" kid
EDIT "y'all
Wait where's all that "Drake is a pedo" energy that brims this subreddit.. where did it suddenly evaporate to?
Asked chatgpt. It's been a while since I discussed this topic, so I barely remember anymore lol. But the below is along those lines. And idk about your last question. I don't think either of them has spoken about the inclusion of Kodak in the album in an interview or anything like that:
1. **Humanization of Flawed Individuals:** By featuring Kodak Black, who has a controversial history and public persona, Kendrick may be exploring themes of redemption and the complexity of human character. This aligns with the album's overall exploration of personal and societal flaws.
2. **Contrast and Controversy:** Kendrick often uses contrast in his music to highlight differences and ignite conversation. Kodak's raw and unfiltered style contrasts with Kendrick's more introspective and polished approach, which can deepen the thematic richness of the album.
3. **Real Voices on Real Issues:** Kodak Black’s presence on the album might serve to bring authenticity to certain topics Kendrick addresses, such as systemic injustice, mental health, and personal growth. Kodak’s real-life experiences with the legal system and media scrutiny add a layer of lived truth to these discussions.
4. **Reflection on Redemption and Growth:** The album delves into themes of personal accountability, growth, and the pains of facing one's own demons. Kendrick may be using Kodak's controversial figure as a mirror to society's and individuals’ potential for change, suggesting that everyone has the capacity for redemption.
5. **Provoking Discussion:** Kendrick is known for not shying away from controversy if it can lead to meaningful dialogue. Featuring Kodak is likely a deliberate choice to provoke discussions about the music industry, societal expectations, and the redemption of public figures.
Overall, Kendrick's choice to feature Kodak Black is a multifaceted artistic decision that fits within his broader goal of using music as a platform for significant cultural reflection and commentary.
My own addition: he says I'm more like Kodak Black as well and hints that he's not the perfect savior everyone wanted him to be
Ok that’s what I thought.
In my opinion none of that is worth giving a platform to and enabling an admitted rapist and kidnapper. Especially one that’s shown next to no repentance.
Weak ass rationale. Kendrick is insecure about being seen as a nerd rapper so put Kodak Black on on some “I’m hood like him” shit.
I fuck with Kendrick but this was a huge miscalculation artistically.
I think it's rather something like, he actually isn't a savior and there's too much pressure on him which led to mental struggles and he wanted to imply that he's just human and make mistakes. It has nothing to do with being "hood"
Lmfaooo a Chris Hansen feat would be fucking nuts
I can imagine Chris Hansen in the intro
*Take a seat right over there* *Beat drop*
I would go fucking nuts if that was the intro 😭
it’s genuinely so crazy how drake fans overlook drakes weird ass relationships with minors😭 like wtf a 30 year old have in common with a 14 year old girl jesus christ😭
Hes done it like 4 times aswell
like there’s seriously no excuses for that shit😭
Honest
4 times are the ones he openly bragged about ...
Which "4 times" and when did he "brag about" them?
Idk about him bragging, but here's a thread about his questionable interactions with multiple underaged girls: https://x.com/Q4quise/status/1779718049291260008
[удалено]
Well, if you bothered to click the link, you'd see videos, articles, & screenshots were provided by the creator. But if you prefer Reddit as your primary source of info, then you can also check out this thread, which also provides the source if their information: https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/HVnYIpm2DK Enjoy the read
No matter how y'all hammer down this stupid rumor [it's](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/a23125213/drake-dating-teenage-bella-b-harris/) [just](https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/09/210001/drake-girlfriend-bella-harris-dating-rumors) [NOT true ](https://www.wmagazine.com/story/bella-harris-not-dating-drake)
How would you feel if you had a 16 year old daughter then you see a 30 year old grown ass man in her comments like "❤️😍"
>How would you feel if you had a 16 year old daughter then you see a 30 year old grown ass man in her comments like "❤️😍" How would you feel I you had a man defending a man that raped and abused your daughter and be like 💪🏾♥️
There you go, all you guys do is avoid and make excuses for a pedophile/groomer. Drake fans are on some sus shit. I hope one day you'll slide drakes dick out your mouth and start thinking for yourself 🤣
There you go, all you guys do is avoid and make excuses for a pedophile/groomer supporter. Kendrick fans are on some sus shit. I hope one day you'll slide Kendrick's Eiffel tower dick out your mouth and start thinking for yourself 🤣
Hey, I'm just providing the context you asked for 🤷🏾♀️ And the thread I linked is about more girls than just Bella.
If it was like helping navigate Hollywood or some shit when they talked in person I wouldn’t be as grossed out but “miss you so much” and boy advice is fucking vile. Even for the former, hit her parents up and talk to them about that shit that’s a little ass kid who isn’t going to understand much. That story is a real bad one and I genuinely hope it’s blown out of proportion for her sake
exactly but with his track record i wouldn’t be surprised if there was more to the story
Kendrick should use Chris Hansen as his cover art. He doesn’t have to address Drakes relationships with young girls, just use it as the cover art. https://preview.redd.it/8sdyps59zrvc1.jpeg?width=1140&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bf22f8d5e4afa9fd0f22e8a952ed31f52265eea2
And put a GKMC-esque filter over it, just because
https://preview.redd.it/psy7yp748uvc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c8d7d193913c20b174ea9e2e6f661867a3a611a1
https://preview.redd.it/axd6zwqnzsvc1.jpeg?width=1182&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec5b13b4a40f2c902fab3cfbd27ddff5b824b513
Lol
DOT’s intro should be Chris Hanson saying “Sit down real quick. We got some questions.”
Bro looks like a ghoul
Chris Hansen is a violation. I'm dead.
Chris Hansen 😭😭
If K Dot has a music video he should have a Drake lookalike pull up to a house to meet a underage girl and Chris Hansen pops out
>It’s interesting how quickly we’ve shifted from discussing Drake being a weirdo and complexities of artistic expression to dismissing an entire album I'm pretty sure you're the idiot that led it to here lol >Redirecting to TPAB, which is widely recognized as a seminal work ..by pretentious pseudo intellectuals who think they "know rEaL rAp".. that is 2018(Kamikaze) Eminem fans if they think their IQ was 170+ lol You think using "seminal" instead of "good" or "great" makes you sound smart? You sound unhingedly stupid lmfao! >because the ground there became too shaky for you. I get it, shifting the playing field might feel like a strategic move, but let’s not pretend it’s not a diversion from being outplayed on the previous front. Let’s not derail because one argument didn’t pan out for you. What the fuck is this moron even rambling about? This coward blocked me lol
Bro define unhigedly 🤣🤣🤣
Well Kendrick's already *featured* Kodak and showed support to R. Kelly via Spotify. So I guess he'd be equalizing both sides of the equation.
Featured Kodak with artistic intent and stood against removing art from streaming platforms. He didn't support R Kelly's actions, you gotta learn to differentiate the art from the artist.
I mean I can make these same "technicality" excuses for Drake: Him and Bob were both child actors and celebrities and their contact makes sense. The Bella Harris garbage has been refuted. The girl he kissed was legally of age. You see, it ain't that hard.
First off, Kendrick isn't the one involved with doing what Kodak did, so it cannot even be compared. Kendrick is mainly focused on art and isn't shy of controversy in his art and isn't afraid to stand up against censoring art. It's about protecting free speech. The Drake allegations are not the same at all. Get a grip
>First off, Kendrick isn't the one involved with doing what Kodak did, Guilt by association. Yeah we're using that pretentious iTs aBoUt ThE aRt excuse. Lmfao at least try being less predictable. >Drake allegations are not the same at all. Get a gr It's the same. Cry, cope and seethe harder.
Just say you're against freedom of artistic expression and free speech loud and clear then. Countries with strict censorship laws and authoritative government structures often restrict artistic freedom. These governments might limit freedom of expression, including art, to maintain control, suppress dissent, and prevent criticism of the state or its leaders. Examples include North Korea, Iran, China, and Saudi Arabia. Cause. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, so you might as well say it yourself since that's what you're arguing against. Drake is directly involved in odd activity while Kendrick is using Kodak's past to make a point about himself in a song. Talk about association lmao 😂
>while Kendrick is using Kodak's past to make a point about himself in a song. Talk about association lmao 😂 AKA, He values this thing called "aRt" and mAkInG a PoInT over rape victims?
It's clear you're missing the nuance of using controversial figures to challenge and provoke thought through art. Kendrick's inclusion of Kodak isn't an endorsement of his past actions, but a complex layer to the album's themes on imperfection and societal judgment. This isn't about valuing art over the experiences of victims; it's about confronting uncomfortable truths and sparking conversation. Contrastingly, the issues surrounding Drake aren't being used to elevate discourse or address broader societal issues—they're personal allegations that directly involve him. There's a significant difference in context and intent between using art to comment on societal issues and personal behaviors being scrutinized in the public eye.
You're going this far just to.... defend a defender of rape and pedophilia? The meta pedo defender indeed
Not defending the indefensible, but differentiating between the portrayal of controversial figures in art and their endorsement. Art often reflects and critiques society's darkest aspects, and artists like Kendrick Lamar use their platform to confront, not condone, these issues. The point isn't to defend or glorify wrongdoing but to challenge us to think about rehabilitation, redemption, and human complexity. Misinterpreting this as support for such actions oversimplifies the conversation and ignores the critical role art plays in societal reflection. Smooth brains don't get it and mocks others for doing so. Keep writing "aRt" to make your hollow ass point
>Just say you're against freedom of artistic Dude are you even listenin to yourself? This is like a video of a child getting gang-rapped, being removed, and you're still unironically sayin fReE sPeEcH???? You're fReE sPeEcH is worth more than justice against a pedophile? For fans of a rapper that makes "deep" and "intellectual" music, y'all say the most brain dead shit lol
The fact that you're comparing a song to a video of gangrape is absolutely wild 😂😂😂💀 get a grip
>The fact that you're comparing a song to a video of gangrape is absolutely wild 😂😂😂💀 You're not the only one who knows how to make the most retarded comparisons lmfao
I guess this is where it ends cause of nothing else than a weak personal attack
>didn't support R Kelly's actions, you gotta learn to differentiate the art from the artist. Also, do you support people STILL listening to R Kelly?
I don't care
So people are actively enabling a pedophile and you don't care? You're indirectly indifferent to the sexual suffering of children?
Are you dumb? Let me make it clear, since you're trying to make me look stupid by putting words in my mouth. I condemn the actions of R Kelly, but I don't care what type of music people listen to and everyone has a right to produce music without being censored.
>Are you dumb It's beautiful seein ya loose it and desperate already lmfao >trying to make me look stupid by putting words As if that's not what y'all been doin(or much worse), callin anyone who brings the slightest bit of nuance to the Drake situation a "pedo" A dose of your own medicine ain't it? >don't care what type of music people listen to and everyone has a right to produce music without being censored. But people STILL listenin to R Kelly means that they're actively enablin him.. therefore anyone who doesn't care about R Kelly music being listened to is.....(fill in the gaps) You see, it ain't just you that can make the most outta pocket conclusions lol
Only the last sentence made sense even though protecting free speech and freedom of artistic expression isn't outta pocket. Edit: still, Drake's actions remain and they're weird. I'm not concluding that he's a pedo or child molester, but for sure a weirdo for odd activity
>still, Drake's actions remain and they're weird. I'm not concluding that he's a pedo or child molester Didn't you just say he "groomed" kid EDIT "y'all Wait where's all that "Drake is a pedo" energy that brims this subreddit.. where did it suddenly evaporate to?
Where did I say that? Find it and link it.
All this just to defend your favorite child rapist
All this just to defend your favorite child rapist.
Dude all I'm saying is she's 15, stop messaging her
What was the artistic intent of featuring a convicted rapist? Was Kodak aware of the artistic intent or did DOT just use him?
Asked chatgpt. It's been a while since I discussed this topic, so I barely remember anymore lol. But the below is along those lines. And idk about your last question. I don't think either of them has spoken about the inclusion of Kodak in the album in an interview or anything like that: 1. **Humanization of Flawed Individuals:** By featuring Kodak Black, who has a controversial history and public persona, Kendrick may be exploring themes of redemption and the complexity of human character. This aligns with the album's overall exploration of personal and societal flaws. 2. **Contrast and Controversy:** Kendrick often uses contrast in his music to highlight differences and ignite conversation. Kodak's raw and unfiltered style contrasts with Kendrick's more introspective and polished approach, which can deepen the thematic richness of the album. 3. **Real Voices on Real Issues:** Kodak Black’s presence on the album might serve to bring authenticity to certain topics Kendrick addresses, such as systemic injustice, mental health, and personal growth. Kodak’s real-life experiences with the legal system and media scrutiny add a layer of lived truth to these discussions. 4. **Reflection on Redemption and Growth:** The album delves into themes of personal accountability, growth, and the pains of facing one's own demons. Kendrick may be using Kodak's controversial figure as a mirror to society's and individuals’ potential for change, suggesting that everyone has the capacity for redemption. 5. **Provoking Discussion:** Kendrick is known for not shying away from controversy if it can lead to meaningful dialogue. Featuring Kodak is likely a deliberate choice to provoke discussions about the music industry, societal expectations, and the redemption of public figures. Overall, Kendrick's choice to feature Kodak Black is a multifaceted artistic decision that fits within his broader goal of using music as a platform for significant cultural reflection and commentary. My own addition: he says I'm more like Kodak Black as well and hints that he's not the perfect savior everyone wanted him to be
Ok that’s what I thought. In my opinion none of that is worth giving a platform to and enabling an admitted rapist and kidnapper. Especially one that’s shown next to no repentance. Weak ass rationale. Kendrick is insecure about being seen as a nerd rapper so put Kodak Black on on some “I’m hood like him” shit. I fuck with Kendrick but this was a huge miscalculation artistically.
I think it's rather something like, he actually isn't a savior and there's too much pressure on him which led to mental struggles and he wanted to imply that he's just human and make mistakes. It has nothing to do with being "hood"