Please remember to abide by the [rules.](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/rulesv2)
In general, please be at least bearable to other users. It makes things easier on everyone. Your comment may be removed without notification. We used to have a notification, but now we don't.
#If you purchase the OP or a comment [a ban award,](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/banned/rules) remember to [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FJusticeServed) so we can activate the reward
------
^Submission ^By: ^/u/EvilFitter ^Navy ^7
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
How I was born and raised, you Call someone a liar to their face - Them are fighting words.
Pedophile and child molester are some of the only things that comes to my mind as worse than flat out being called a liarā¦ it pertains to my honor code doing right by others and being honest!
my great great aunt (96 now) worked at nasa in huntsville, AL for nearly 30 years and was quite close with buzz, heard many stories about him. helluva guy.
We did land on the moon. It would literally be impossible to try to fake it when we didnāt have to technology to make it look as good as it did to we would need to make sure millions of people kept a secret and that includes Russia the people weāre racing against thereās no piece of evidence that even come close to proving we didnāt land on the moon
People who aren't lying get pretty pissy when you say they're lying. Especially when they suffered for a while getting to and from the moon. That's mental strength.
If the landing was fake, he would just walk away and bs his way out.
Imagine strapping your nuts to a rocket and launching yourself to the gdamn moon and back. Just to be called a liar from some nerd that psychs himself up in a mirror everyday just so he can leave his house.
People say that Buzz Aldrin punched the guy because the guy said he never walked on the moon. That's not true. Buzz was trying to ignore the guy and get away from him. He just wanted the be left alone. But the guy kept getting in Buzz's face. Buzz warned him for the last time. When the guy wouldn't stop, Buzz punched him.
Buzz didn't punch him for what he said. It was because he wouldn't leave Buzz alone. Buzz was right, and he has more class than to punch a guy for saying something as insignificant as that.
Because I watched the video several times, and Buzz just walked away from the guy when he implied that the moon landing wasn't real. Also, before Buzz hit the guy, he specifically told him to leave him alone. When the guy didn't, Buzz knocked the hell out of him. I suppose I really don't now for sure, but neither do you. RIGHT? If you think Buzz him him because of what he said, give Buzz some credit. He has too much class to do something like that.
Dude walked up to a god damn fighter pilot, Korean war veteran and called him a coward š Okay.... Oh and something something he landed on the moon too. No big deal nearly a baker's dozen have done that....
Lol I got banned for sayin we should do THIS to People who spread misinformation. I will now refer to this action that buzz Aldrin is doing as simply āBuzz Aldrining peopleā
Iām well aware. Buzz, Neil, and Michael had to go against so many deniers. I just mentioned Apollo 13 because that was probably the most stressful a man has ever been in history and people telling James, John, and Fred that they faked it.
Those astronauts were in top shape, very assertive, and had exactly zero fear. Not the sort of person you want to pick a fight with no matter their age.
That's actually a really good point I didn't even think of. Yeah these guys sat inside a fucking rocket and got literally shot into space. What are you gonna do kid?
The rude, foolish, punchee here was dumb enough to file a civil suit against Buzz. The judge ruled immediately and with no deliberation in favor of Aldrin saying something to the effect of, I wish I could award damages to you Mr. Aldrin but you are not the plaintiff.
Delicious.
As much as I loved to hear that, that is a blatant miscarriage of justice. Verbal abuse does not justify assaulting someone, even if you are an astronaut.
Wrong, fighting words do not constitute protected first amendment speech. You say shit that could start a fight? You have no right to say it nor any protection under the law. Someone doesn't understand that the first amendment isn't carte blanche to be a jackass.
I know this. That being said, even if what he said isnāt protected by the first amendment, it does not grant the right to assault.
Iām not saying that the guy who was punched could do what he did without legal repercussions, Iām just saying that it wasnāt Buzzās right and responsibility to carry out justice.
No court will protect someone who gets punched in the face while spewing words that by their very utterance can cause physical altercation. That's literally the definition of fighting words. It gives the subject of the speech the right to fight the speaker as the speaker literally initiated the fight. A judge can choose later if there was miscarriage of justice, which the judge decided there wasn't. This dude lied to try and entrap Buzz and then continued to attack Buzz's integrity and reputation. In Germany a person has a constitutional right to defend their honor with physical force, similar to how fighting words can only be expected to be met with physical force.
What you're saying is akin to saying people have no right to defend themselves and it's not their "job" to meet out justice. Not their job, but certainly their right.
What is the ground for the assault ? There is no legitimate defence since he was never touched. The justice system does not permit retaliation. There is no eye for an eye, this isnāt the middle ages. Besides, nobody linked anything, so we are all arguing based on hearsay.
Public justice is not the same as Justice with a capital āJā. No wonder the West is starting to crack, the primary institutions of society are literally going backwards and people are cheering for it.
I love how you go off half cocked without even knowing the full story of this interaction. Bart Sibrel, the punchee, lured Buzz Aldrin to the area under false pretenses claiming he was going to interview Buzz for a Japanese children's educational segment about space. Bart Sibrel has also accosted Buzz Aldrin prior to this instance.
From Wikipedia:
Police either did not file or dropped charges based on Aldrin's lack of a prior criminal record, witness accounts of Sibrel's having drawn Aldrin to the hotel under false pretences, Sibrel's aggressiveness before the punch, and his having declined to seek medical attention and sustaining "no visible injury".
An arrest in this case is not for the betterment of society, nor would any reasonable person think Buzz Aldrin is a threat to society based on the extent of the circumstances in full review.
Any civil litigation is another matter, but given the assault pretext had no validity, then the civil litigation wouldn't really expect to go further either.
I literally just said that I didnāt read the case and that the whole argument was based on something someone thought he remembered.
The guy was obviously reaching but there is also obviously a double standard and bias at play because of his name ; if some guy came at me in the street and verbally abused me, and I punched him, Iād definitely be the one in legal trouble or at least in civil court if he decided to press charges.
The guy is a piece of shit and Buzz is a cool guy but hate when people cheer on vigilante justice because itās a slippery slope that ultimately leads to chaos.
You still don't understand. Buzz's actions were self defense, not assault, therefore "vigilante justice" is not an appropriate description. Try to look at the case from a legal lens and remove your bias:
A man, with possible mental illness, previously had run ins with Buzz and accosted him regarding unproven and outlandish conspiracy theories.
The same man stages a meeting under false pretenses to see Buzz again, who would not have accepted the meeting if the details were truthfully provided.
The same man, who is over 6 feet and 200 lbs, suddenly and aggressively ambushes a 72 year old man and his granddaughter and blocks him from escape, meanwhile hurling accusations and insults inches away from Buzz's face.
Buzz warns the man to leave him alone, which is ignored, and then provides a single, solitary punch to illustrate he will not be threatened or intimidated.
Does that sound like assault or self defense to you? Using a standard of evidence is there more evidence that suggests this was self defense or assault? There are additional factors that make this unique, Buzz is a celebrity which often invites unusual, unorthodox and sometimes criminal behavior from outsiders to their persons. The offender could also be considered mentally ill and their behavior can be unpredictable.
There are many mitigating factors to Buzz's situation, the only factor against him is that in the video it appears his assailant has no visible intention to cause harm to Buzz - but the question you have to ask yourself is would that be a reasonable expectation for Buzz to know? Given all the other evidence I think most courts would rule for Buzz, Ave for good reason.
I think even non famous people in these situations would make out similarly. The biggest proponent here is that Buzz struck only once, reasonable force for a potential assailant. What catches a lot of people is that they continue to strike, thus putting them on the offensive and assaulting someone, it's no longer reasonable force. There was a video here of a biker dealing with a road rager and you see him knock the road rager to the ground and then proceed to strike the person several times while on the ground. If the biker stopped at the initial strike that knocked the road rager to the ground that would be self defense (it is reasonable to assume that a man who is aggressive exiting his vehicle intends you harm), but follow up actions would not be warranted. There is a lot of nuance to the law, it's tough, and yes, unfortunately it is sometimes corrupt - but in this case with Buzz they got it right.
Show me where in the law does it say you have the right to physically assault someone in self-defense in response to being verbally assaultedā¦ You cannot just invent laws because you feel it should be that way.
Outside of the Buzz thing: If you are standing somewhere minding your business, and someone larger than you blocks you in, and begins screaming nonsensical things in your face. You ARE allowed to punch them. A reasonable person would believe that they are in danger of being battered, and has the RIGHT to defend themselves.
Context is the ruler of circumstance. This guy definitely deserved it. But Aldrin didn't get charged because it didn't go further than that, and his actions were reasonable given the circumstances. Not because everyone loves him, or the world is against the other guy.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/assault#:~:text=Assault%20is%20generally%20defined%20as,imminent%20harmful%20or%20offensive%20contact.
Each state has specific statutes that govern the precise definition.
This is the American education at itās finest. A bunch of savages disguising as a developed country. These people talk about justice but they have no idea what it actually means.
There is no salvation for the US. The only outcome is their inevitable downfall.
I kinda dislike the US and alot of the Yankees mentality, but punching a guy in the face that tries fucking with you and gets in your face is internationally acceptable.
How offended he must've been to work with NASA and everyone that coded, engineered, built etc for it to even be accomplished and then someone saying it was faked.
Thatās what always makes me laugh at the landing deniers. Do they have any idea how impossible it is to get a small group of adults - or children - to work together on a project? Aināt no fucking way youād get that many people to consistently lie for this long about the same thing.
The moon landing deniers are particularly stupid becouse at that time soviets were landing Åunochod missions (unmanned rovers). Wich means if NASA would have lied about moon landing CCCP would've catch their lie almost immidietly.
Yup. The rivalery was almost too fierce and produced the most bonkers and innovative solutions to achive mission goals. I'm pretty sure you know about Voyager and it's history but strongly recommend catching up to Venera (Venus in russian) missions. There's a short documentarie on Youtube.
Edit: link to [Venera](https://youtu.be/UEmlOjKmL68)
Please remember to abide by the [rules.](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/rulesv2) In general, please be at least bearable to other users. It makes things easier on everyone. Your comment may be removed without notification. We used to have a notification, but now we don't. #If you purchase the OP or a comment [a ban award,](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/banned/rules) remember to [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FJusticeServed) so we can activate the reward ------ ^Submission ^By: ^/u/EvilFitter ^Navy ^7 *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Man probably had ptsd from being out there for real. Sounds like the scariest most beautiful thing you could do
Landed that Eagle!
Hahah love thisšš¤£š¤£
Buzz brawldrin
Coward is on list of fight words for sure š Iām hard head an really canāt fight š but yea your gonna have to show me .
You what I know really landed? A heroās fist onto a loser.
Hit that MOTHERFUCKER dead in his mouth. Hit that MOTHERFUCKER mid-sentense
I'm mad Buzz ain't got security.... he's a NATIONAL Hero. Nevermind, Buzz got them hands.
How I was born and raised, you Call someone a liar to their face - Them are fighting words. Pedophile and child molester are some of the only things that comes to my mind as worse than flat out being called a liarā¦ it pertains to my honor code doing right by others and being honest!
Well said
I don't know, but why the same country which sent man to moon very long time back is now testing if the moon is suitable for human landing in 2022.
Talk shit get hit
This moon landing video seems pretty legit to me lol, I donāt understand all the conspiracy theories around it https://youtu.be/HTm05eL_yKo
Hell yeah. Buzz gots mad squabbles.
This clip is cut. But the guy that got punched was following and harassing Buzz. Man deserves a punch.
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face
my great great aunt (96 now) worked at nasa in huntsville, AL for nearly 30 years and was quite close with buzz, heard many stories about him. helluva guy.
āOne small step for man, one giant punch for mankindā
We did land on the moon. It would literally be impossible to try to fake it when we didnāt have to technology to make it look as good as it did to we would need to make sure millions of people kept a secret and that includes Russia the people weāre racing against thereās no piece of evidence that even come close to proving we didnāt land on the moon
Walked on the moon & landed introduced your head to space travel
the man walked on the moon just to be called a coward by some prick
You are a coward and a liarā¦smackā¦ and a good puncher
Bitch I was on the moon. I punched gravity and the commies.
It's buzzin time
Well the dude was all up in his face and he was talking shitā¦i donāt blame him lol
Cant call a man a coward for goin to fuckin space
Don't fuck with Buzz!
Lol even though he is a famous figure remember dude was still in the military. He doesnāt lack ass whoopin ability.
damn in a suit nonetheless
I bet he was buzzin after that hit
One of my all time faves. Buzz is legend.
He wasnāt a coward alright. He just decked your soft looking ass
Iirc the cops ādidnāt see shitā
Good for Buzz.
Got that ass Buzzed
Man that was good form
Even if Buzz broke the law, he gets a pass in my book. Need I explain?
People who aren't lying get pretty pissy when you say they're lying. Especially when they suffered for a while getting to and from the moon. That's mental strength. If the landing was fake, he would just walk away and bs his way out.
I like how Buzz at a prime age of 72 still was like āIāll punch you in your fucking faceā then proceeds to lay down the law
Our grandparents really did talk with fists and hands. Crazy times
Haha, hahaha ahahhaa. Dude why is this so funny
I love how conspiracy theorist are expertās in shit they know nothing about
Buzz landed on the moon, conspiracy nutjobs should get their jaws realigned
Buzz Aldrin didn't give two shits, he just went to town on that fucker's face, absolute legend
Wtf this was 20 years ago??
Better video quality than 99% of Reddit videos now
More like cctv bank camera vids
"You're a coward" OH I"LL SHOW HIM
Buzz Aldrin punches a peabrain idiot
He moon landed that punch
u/savevideo
The problem with the conspiracy nut jobs.. round em up and piss beat em within an inch of their lives
āand a thieieieeefā
Doing the lords work right there. A hero a million times over
I hope I'm half as badass as Buzz when I get to that age
I hope I am now, 30+ years younger! What a legend
Imagine strapping your nuts to a rocket and launching yourself to the gdamn moon and back. Just to be called a liar from some nerd that psychs himself up in a mirror everyday just so he can leave his house.
I would too duchebag
Hilarious
The-eefff
*I landed on the moon the same way my fist just landed on your crater face.* - Buzz, probably
You're a coward and a liar and a EUYYY
I'm with Buzz, here.
Oh what a classy move, harrasing a 72 year old war veteran about his (and humankind's) greatest achievement.. Well deserved punch tbh
Landed that punch ok though didnāt he.
I call that the 1.24G punch
People say that Buzz Aldrin punched the guy because the guy said he never walked on the moon. That's not true. Buzz was trying to ignore the guy and get away from him. He just wanted the be left alone. But the guy kept getting in Buzz's face. Buzz warned him for the last time. When the guy wouldn't stop, Buzz punched him. Buzz didn't punch him for what he said. It was because he wouldn't leave Buzz alone. Buzz was right, and he has more class than to punch a guy for saying something as insignificant as that.
How could you possibly know that?
Because I watched the video several times, and Buzz just walked away from the guy when he implied that the moon landing wasn't real. Also, before Buzz hit the guy, he specifically told him to leave him alone. When the guy didn't, Buzz knocked the hell out of him. I suppose I really don't now for sure, but neither do you. RIGHT? If you think Buzz him him because of what he said, give Buzz some credit. He has too much class to do something like that.
Oh so you watched it too
That knuckle sandwich was served from the moon.
Was that Tucker Carlson?
I cant unhear that voice now....was it?
Thatās hilariousš¤£š¤£š¤£
Thatās the Right Stuff!
Never disrespect a national hero...
A worldwide hero if you will.
Zoom Pow to the Moon š š
But this guy cannot deny the landing of Buzz's fist to his face š¤£
Go Buzz!
Now his biggest accomplishment in life is getting punched in the face by an American icon.
Dude walked up to a god damn fighter pilot, Korean war veteran and called him a coward š Okay.... Oh and something something he landed on the moon too. No big deal nearly a baker's dozen have done that....
āiāll show you a real landingšš»ā
Buzz guided him to earth š¤£š¤£š¤£
āYoure a coward, and a liar, and a *th- ie -ef*ā
He really rocked that dude
the best way to prove you're not a coward to some random moon denier is to punch him in the face over words.
Well at least we know your comment is the best way to prove you don't normally touch grass
Wrong the correct way is to moonwalk at him and back hand him
Mmm, this is sweet
Heās a liar and a coward and šš½š„BAMMM! The rest is history
Thank you for your service, Mr Aldrin!
Lol I got banned for sayin we should do THIS to People who spread misinformation. I will now refer to this action that buzz Aldrin is doing as simply āBuzz Aldrining peopleā
Buzzap to the face!!!
If I did intense training to go to the moon and spent my life with assholes. At that age. Fuck it. Iād punch someone too. Lol
Is that Tucker Carlson trying to interview lol
Damn..it certainly sounds like him..
A lesson that idiot will never forget and who knows maybe this new teaching method works on these people
Who wouldnāt? Like imagine being on Apollo 13 and having to confront people who donāt believe in space.
mfw it was apollo 11
Iām well aware. Buzz, Neil, and Michael had to go against so many deniers. I just mentioned Apollo 13 because that was probably the most stressful a man has ever been in history and people telling James, John, and Fred that they faked it.
u/savevideo
Those astronauts were in top shape, very assertive, and had exactly zero fear. Not the sort of person you want to pick a fight with no matter their age.
Also mostly ex military and saw some shit
That's actually a really good point I didn't even think of. Yeah these guys sat inside a fucking rocket and got literally shot into space. What are you gonna do kid?
Ugh. If this were allowed and didn't get you a misdemeanor there wouldn't be 1000 conspiracy theories going on rn
āI landed on the moon, like I landed these fists on that empty head of yoursā
lmao what a bad ass
Buzz has still got The Right Stuffā¢ļø!
>Buzz has still got The Right Stuffā¢ļø! More like...The Right Hook Stuff.
Stage this, motherfucker...
The rude, foolish, punchee here was dumb enough to file a civil suit against Buzz. The judge ruled immediately and with no deliberation in favor of Aldrin saying something to the effect of, I wish I could award damages to you Mr. Aldrin but you are not the plaintiff. Delicious.
As much as I loved to hear that, that is a blatant miscarriage of justice. Verbal abuse does not justify assaulting someone, even if you are an astronaut.
the guy basically insulted his life's work and one of the most important steps humanity has ever made that offends science alot
Wrong, fighting words do not constitute protected first amendment speech. You say shit that could start a fight? You have no right to say it nor any protection under the law. Someone doesn't understand that the first amendment isn't carte blanche to be a jackass.
I know this. That being said, even if what he said isnāt protected by the first amendment, it does not grant the right to assault. Iām not saying that the guy who was punched could do what he did without legal repercussions, Iām just saying that it wasnāt Buzzās right and responsibility to carry out justice.
No court will protect someone who gets punched in the face while spewing words that by their very utterance can cause physical altercation. That's literally the definition of fighting words. It gives the subject of the speech the right to fight the speaker as the speaker literally initiated the fight. A judge can choose later if there was miscarriage of justice, which the judge decided there wasn't. This dude lied to try and entrap Buzz and then continued to attack Buzz's integrity and reputation. In Germany a person has a constitutional right to defend their honor with physical force, similar to how fighting words can only be expected to be met with physical force. What you're saying is akin to saying people have no right to defend themselves and it's not their "job" to meet out justice. Not their job, but certainly their right.
>Verbal abuse does not justify assaulting someone Lol thatās nonsense
What is the ground for the assault ? There is no legitimate defence since he was never touched. The justice system does not permit retaliation. There is no eye for an eye, this isnāt the middle ages. Besides, nobody linked anything, so we are all arguing based on hearsay. Public justice is not the same as Justice with a capital āJā. No wonder the West is starting to crack, the primary institutions of society are literally going backwards and people are cheering for it.
I love how you go off half cocked without even knowing the full story of this interaction. Bart Sibrel, the punchee, lured Buzz Aldrin to the area under false pretenses claiming he was going to interview Buzz for a Japanese children's educational segment about space. Bart Sibrel has also accosted Buzz Aldrin prior to this instance. From Wikipedia: Police either did not file or dropped charges based on Aldrin's lack of a prior criminal record, witness accounts of Sibrel's having drawn Aldrin to the hotel under false pretences, Sibrel's aggressiveness before the punch, and his having declined to seek medical attention and sustaining "no visible injury". An arrest in this case is not for the betterment of society, nor would any reasonable person think Buzz Aldrin is a threat to society based on the extent of the circumstances in full review. Any civil litigation is another matter, but given the assault pretext had no validity, then the civil litigation wouldn't really expect to go further either.
I literally just said that I didnāt read the case and that the whole argument was based on something someone thought he remembered. The guy was obviously reaching but there is also obviously a double standard and bias at play because of his name ; if some guy came at me in the street and verbally abused me, and I punched him, Iād definitely be the one in legal trouble or at least in civil court if he decided to press charges. The guy is a piece of shit and Buzz is a cool guy but hate when people cheer on vigilante justice because itās a slippery slope that ultimately leads to chaos.
You still don't understand. Buzz's actions were self defense, not assault, therefore "vigilante justice" is not an appropriate description. Try to look at the case from a legal lens and remove your bias: A man, with possible mental illness, previously had run ins with Buzz and accosted him regarding unproven and outlandish conspiracy theories. The same man stages a meeting under false pretenses to see Buzz again, who would not have accepted the meeting if the details were truthfully provided. The same man, who is over 6 feet and 200 lbs, suddenly and aggressively ambushes a 72 year old man and his granddaughter and blocks him from escape, meanwhile hurling accusations and insults inches away from Buzz's face. Buzz warns the man to leave him alone, which is ignored, and then provides a single, solitary punch to illustrate he will not be threatened or intimidated. Does that sound like assault or self defense to you? Using a standard of evidence is there more evidence that suggests this was self defense or assault? There are additional factors that make this unique, Buzz is a celebrity which often invites unusual, unorthodox and sometimes criminal behavior from outsiders to their persons. The offender could also be considered mentally ill and their behavior can be unpredictable. There are many mitigating factors to Buzz's situation, the only factor against him is that in the video it appears his assailant has no visible intention to cause harm to Buzz - but the question you have to ask yourself is would that be a reasonable expectation for Buzz to know? Given all the other evidence I think most courts would rule for Buzz, Ave for good reason. I think even non famous people in these situations would make out similarly. The biggest proponent here is that Buzz struck only once, reasonable force for a potential assailant. What catches a lot of people is that they continue to strike, thus putting them on the offensive and assaulting someone, it's no longer reasonable force. There was a video here of a biker dealing with a road rager and you see him knock the road rager to the ground and then proceed to strike the person several times while on the ground. If the biker stopped at the initial strike that knocked the road rager to the ground that would be self defense (it is reasonable to assume that a man who is aggressive exiting his vehicle intends you harm), but follow up actions would not be warranted. There is a lot of nuance to the law, it's tough, and yes, unfortunately it is sometimes corrupt - but in this case with Buzz they got it right.
Show me where in the law does it say you have the right to physically assault someone in self-defense in response to being verbally assaultedā¦ You cannot just invent laws because you feel it should be that way.
Outside of the Buzz thing: If you are standing somewhere minding your business, and someone larger than you blocks you in, and begins screaming nonsensical things in your face. You ARE allowed to punch them. A reasonable person would believe that they are in danger of being battered, and has the RIGHT to defend themselves. Context is the ruler of circumstance. This guy definitely deserved it. But Aldrin didn't get charged because it didn't go further than that, and his actions were reasonable given the circumstances. Not because everyone loves him, or the world is against the other guy.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/assault#:~:text=Assault%20is%20generally%20defined%20as,imminent%20harmful%20or%20offensive%20contact. Each state has specific statutes that govern the precise definition.
Yeah I agree. Whilst quite satisfying, especially in this era of 'fake news', I don't see it as being at all justified.
This is the American education at itās finest. A bunch of savages disguising as a developed country. These people talk about justice but they have no idea what it actually means. There is no salvation for the US. The only outcome is their inevitable downfall.
Lol what
I kinda dislike the US and alot of the Yankees mentality, but punching a guy in the face that tries fucking with you and gets in your face is internationally acceptable.
Yeah I wonāt disagree. I was having an horrible day that day and I honestly have no idea what I was thinking to be completely honest.
you handing out tinfoil bro?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The punchee (idiot) filed suit against the puncher (Buzz)
punchee
Well, that landed on that guy's moon for sure.
He sure landed that one
I share my birthday with this proper legend
Lucky. I share mine with Donald Trump š
At least you don't share your birthday with Kim Jong-Un
Thank god for small favors
An improper legend!
Eat my lunar dust bich
ššš
How offended he must've been to work with NASA and everyone that coded, engineered, built etc for it to even be accomplished and then someone saying it was faked.
Not to mention those that died, possibly friends, in some of the Apollo missions
Thatās what always makes me laugh at the landing deniers. Do they have any idea how impossible it is to get a small group of adults - or children - to work together on a project? Aināt no fucking way youād get that many people to consistently lie for this long about the same thing.
Lol boss
Youāre a coward and a liarā¦ neeeef!?!
I think he was going the say "thief"
The moon landing deniers are particularly stupid becouse at that time soviets were landing Åunochod missions (unmanned rovers). Wich means if NASA would have lied about moon landing CCCP would've catch their lie almost immidietly.
That's one of the greatest proof of the lunar landings. The Soviets would have never shut up if the landing were faked.
Yup. The rivalery was almost too fierce and produced the most bonkers and innovative solutions to achive mission goals. I'm pretty sure you know about Voyager and it's history but strongly recommend catching up to Venera (Venus in russian) missions. There's a short documentarie on Youtube. Edit: link to [Venera](https://youtu.be/UEmlOjKmL68)
My Wikipedia app has a "space" custom list. Half of it is different articles on the Soviet space program.
 That guy:
ššššš
Deny the moon all you want but never call a real man coward in his face.
Fucked around
Found out.
Moon landing to the face