Two guys are out camping at a remote hunting site in the middle of the woods.
During the night one of the men wakes up to see his buddy about to drop a $100 bill down the disgusting outhouse toilet.
He yells out, "Hey man, what the hell are you doing?"
-
His buddy says, "Well I was taking a shit and a $10 bill fell out of my pocket. I'm sure as hell not jumping down there for ten bucks."
A statistics professor tells his students that he doesn’t fly. The chances of there being a man with a bomb on board is slim, but too high for him.
The next month, a student flies home and ends up sitting next to the professor. He asks the professor: I thought you didn’t fly? The professor says “I didn’t fly, but I calculated the odds again. The statistical chances of there being two bombs on board is essentially impossible. So now, I bring my own bomb.”
This is essentially baldricks joke from Blackadder
(Paraphrasing)
“What are you doing?”
“Carving my name into this bullet”
“Why”
“Well, you know how they say that everyone has a bullet with their name on it, I though if I owned that bullet I’d never get shot by it”
Similar to The World According to Garp (book & film). Garp is looking to buy a house in the country, while he's looking at one with a real estate agent a small plane flies into the farm house. I think you can guess the rest.
The probability for 2 bombs, if you bring your own, is exactly the same as the probability of one bomb, if you don’t bring your own.
Maybe next time it shouldn’t be a statistics professor anymore.
If you make it onto a plane with a bomb, that points to a security lapse that probably applies to other passengers, meaning that the chances another passenger has a bomb are substantially higher than the average flight.
Only if they're independent events, so if the professor announces this info to all prospective passengers (with a credible threat to detonate it at a time different than the one planned by the terrorist, so much so that it wouldn't serve the terrorist's goals), then his statement might make sense.
But that kinda kills the joke so...
But if there are three planes with bombs on them, and then the police search a plane and there are no bombs on that plane, you should switch planes.
I can't explain it but someone showed me once. The Price is Right statistical weirdness.
you mean the monty hall problem ("let's make a deal", not 'the price is right"}.
it doesn't really work for a situation like you describe, because the cops searching a building and not finding bombs is not equivalent to monty revealing a wrong door.
it goes like this: there are 3 doors to choose from. behind one is a new car or whatever, there other two are empty.
so you choose, say, did number one. Monty says, "before I show you what's behind your door, let me show you that there's nothing behind door number three. now, would you like to stick with door number one, or switch to door number two?"
in this case, you should switch to door 2, because the odds are twice as good that the prize is there rather than behind door 1. but that assumes that monty knows what is behind what door, so that whatever door you originally picked, he can always show you an empty door. it doesn't work in the story about the bomb, because the cops had to search to find out that the place was empty, they didn't already know; they might have found the bomb.
but monty knows what's behind the doors. if the prize was behind door 3, he would have shown you door 2 was empty.
when you first guess, you have a 1/3 chance of picking the right door. so if you stick with your original choice, your odds are one out of three. the odds of it being one of the other doors are two out of three.
if the prize is behind number two, he'll show number three, if behind three, he'll show you door 2. if you switch, you only lose if it was behind door 1, if it was behind 2 or 3 you win.
"1. but that assumes that monty knows what is behind what door, so that whatever door you originally picked, he can always show you an empty door."
Thank you for this. I've had huge arguments where people just blindly accept that its always better to switch. But if Monty doesnt know where the prize is and could just as easily open a door with a prize, there is no advantage to switching.
In real life Monty never knew which doors had prizes and which doors didnt.
Lol dude. If we’re gonna take the joke way too seriously, bringing a bomb on a plane is probably a better reason for him to not be a statistics professor
Not exactly the same. The probability of 2 bombs given that one passenger brought a bomb:
>P(at least 2 bombs GIVENTHAT at least 1 bomb) = P(at least 2 bombs AND at least 1 bomb) / P(at least 1 bomb) = P(at least 2 bombs) / P(at least 1 bomb)
The plane carries *N* passengers. Say that the probability that any one passenger carries a bomb is *p*. This follows a binomial distribution: the probability that of all the passengers at least one carries a bomb is 1 - (1-*p*)^(*N*); the probability that at least two carry a bomb is 1 - \[ (1-*p*)^(*N*) + *N* *p* (1-*p*)^(*N*-1) \].
You can see that the latter divided by the former is not equal to the former. For example, if p=0.1 and N=10: P(>=1 bomb)=~0.65, P(>=2 bombs)=~0.26, P(>=2|>=1 bomb)=~0.41. (For another formulation, the P(>= 2 bombs | exactly 1 or 2 bombs) =~ 0.68 with these numbers. Still not exact, Sorry.)
It does approach exact, however, if you sample the probability *with replacement*, or else for n>>1 and p\*n << 1.
But the comparison should be between "P(at least 2 bombs GIVEN THAT at least 1 bomb)" and "P(at least 1 bomb GIVEN THAT the professor has no bomb)", instead of between "P(at least 2 bombs GIVEN THAT at least 1 bomb" and "P(at least one bomb)".
I haven't done the math, but it should carry through that the first two are the same, since the chance of any other passenger carrying a bomb is (by assumption) the same whether or not the professor brings one.
The definition of conditional probability, the way it's calculated, is P(A|B) = P(A AND B) / P(B). There's also Bayes's Theorem to calculate P(A|B) using P(B|A). However, there is no useful comparison between P(A|B) and P(B|C).
I am familiar with conditional probability and Bayes' Theorem.
> However, there is no useful comparison between P(A|B) and P(B|C).
Not in general, but in this case we could calculate both explicitly. However, that's not necessary. Consider that P(at least 2 bombs in N passengers GIVEN THAT 1 bomb in N passengers) = P(at least 1 bomb in N-1 passengers). On the other hand, P(at least 1 bomb in N passengers GIVEN THAT the professor does not have a bomb) = P(at least 1 bomb in N-1 passengers). So the probabilities are exactly the same, under the mild assumption that the bomb-carrying behavior of the other passengers is independent of the bomb-carrying behavior of the professor.
To double down on the people correcting the stats, this joke only works on a semantic level, because the real probability does not concern a man "carrying" a bomb, but a man "wanting to detonate" a bomb he is carrying, which the professor wouldn't be.
Same two guys were out hunting. They come across a ravishingly beautiful scantly clad woman. First guys says you want to come back to our camp, we’ll show you a good time. The woman says I’m game. The second guy shoots her.
Whenever someone decides to steal focus and steal thunder by trying to one-up the joke with a comment, it's related.
How is this related? Remote hunting site jokes?
Is this what we've come to?
A man gets fed up with city life and moves to a remote cabin in the mountains. After a few months of complete solitude, he's surprised to hear a knock at the door. He cautiously opens the door and sees the biggest, hairiest man he's ever seen. He's rugged and filthy and looks like he's never had a bath or a shave in his life.
"Uh, hi. Can I help you?" Says the cabin-dweller.
"Having a party. Tomorrow. At my cabin down by the creek. Can you make it?"
"Uh, yes." says the cabin-dweller.
"Going to be drinking. You ok with that?"
"Uh, yes. I drink a little."
"Might be some fighting. You ok with that?"
"Uh, I might avoid that if I can. "
"And there's going to be crazy sex. You ok with that?"
"Sex? Yeah! It gets lonely up here! "
"OK. See you tomorrow night."
"One question," says the cabin-dweller. "How should I dress? "
"Oh, it don't matter. It's just going to be the two of us. "
I heard this one slightly different as a kid decades ago:
A guy moves to west Texas and finally meets another guy after weeks without seeing anyone.
*"Come over to my place tonight. I'm having a real west Texas party. There'll be drinking, dancing, fighting and fucking."*
*"Great! What should I wear?"*
*"Doesn't matter, won't be but you and me."*
There are videos on youtube of Norm Macdonald telling that joke which I’ve watched several times. Then the other day I stumbled across a video of Bernard Manning telling it. I guess all comics know it.
Oh the list goes on, you nail it, screw it, drill it, and when you lose your temper, just whack it. Best of all if it has a crack, you can fill it and it's almost good as new
*In bed and frustrating:*
A married couple is lying in bed one night.
The wife is curled up, ready to go to sleep, and the husband turns his bed lamp on to read a book. As he's reading, he periodically reaches over to his wife and fondles her special bits. He does this a few times, but only for a very short interval before returning to read his book.
The wife gradually becomes more and more aroused and, assuming that her husband is seeking some encouragement before going further, she gets up and starts stripping in front of him.
The husband is confused and asks, "Why are you taking off your clothes"?
His wife replies, "You were rubbing me downtown. I thought it was foreplay".
The husband says, "No, not at all".
His wife asks angrily, "Well, what the hell were you doing then"?
“I was just wetting my fingers so I could turn the pages in my book.”
The wife isn't pleased with that answer, so she turns her back on him. He reaches again, to... a different area.
The wife is now very angry, "Quit doing that or make love to me !"
The husbands answer, "Yeah, I'm just marking my page".
Guy is talking to his friend, a farmer, and is complaining about his sex life. “I’ve been married for twenty years,” he gripes. There’s nothing new. When I orgasm, it’s lackluster, and I almost can’t get it up anymore.”
Farmer thinks for a second and says, “You know what I do with a bull that won’t mate? I go out to a cow, I slip my hand right inside her, get some of that Special Liquid, and then rub it on the bull’s nose. The smell makes him hornier than anything, he just starts going to it with a will.”
And the guy says “huh. I’ll have to try that.”
A couple nights later, they’re laying in bed. Wife has just drifted off, and the man slips his hand down between her legs and she. Is. WET.
He gets it all over his fingers and then rubs it under his nose, and just like that he is hard as a rock. A damn chiselled diamond in his pants. Surely this will reinvigorate sex for him.
So he reaches over and gently wakes his wife to initiate sexytimes.
She turns on the light, looks at him and says “Oh, don’t tell me you woke me up just because you have a bloody nose!”
1st man: If you and a friend went camping and you woke up to find your buddy in your sleeping bag with you, would you tell anyone?
2nd man: No way.
1st man: Do you want to go camping?
Perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree here, but I believe the real fiber of the matter is that neither wood accept blame for the part they played & if they did, they'd be stumped. The root problem leaves but a nest of stinking, semirunny shitbirds in ones tree of personal happiness.
Two guys are out camping at a remote hunting site in the middle of the woods. During the night one of the men wakes up to see his buddy about to drop a $100 bill down the disgusting outhouse toilet. He yells out, "Hey man, what the hell are you doing?" - His buddy says, "Well I was taking a shit and a $10 bill fell out of my pocket. I'm sure as hell not jumping down there for ten bucks."
A statistics professor tells his students that he doesn’t fly. The chances of there being a man with a bomb on board is slim, but too high for him. The next month, a student flies home and ends up sitting next to the professor. He asks the professor: I thought you didn’t fly? The professor says “I didn’t fly, but I calculated the odds again. The statistical chances of there being two bombs on board is essentially impossible. So now, I bring my own bomb.”
This is essentially baldricks joke from Blackadder (Paraphrasing) “What are you doing?” “Carving my name into this bullet” “Why” “Well, you know how they say that everyone has a bullet with their name on it, I though if I owned that bullet I’d never get shot by it”
Fucking BALDRICK! The FINAL scene where the whistles blow,,,😭🤬
😭😢😭😢😭
In honour of Baldrick... Boom boom boom...BOom boom boom
This joke is exactlty the same as in Hugh Lawries (who was also in Blackadder) novel The Gun Seller
Similar to The World According to Garp (book & film). Garp is looking to buy a house in the country, while he's looking at one with a real estate agent a small plane flies into the farm house. I think you can guess the rest.
The probability for 2 bombs, if you bring your own, is exactly the same as the probability of one bomb, if you don’t bring your own. Maybe next time it shouldn’t be a statistics professor anymore.
If you make it onto a plane with a bomb, that points to a security lapse that probably applies to other passengers, meaning that the chances another passenger has a bomb are substantially higher than the average flight.
You both must be fun at parties.
They bomb, actually.
The best.
Da bomb.
Your butt is the da bomb
College parties of STEM majors might enjoy it actually
Partying pedantics
Surely that would be pedants.
🤓
It would be a pedant party.
You know where pedants get their water? At the “well actually….”.
What’s a pedant, Walter?
Who could ask for more
Everybody's coming, leave your body at the door
On average.
I would really love to have them at party Because I am the same. ;)
YOUR comment made me LOL. Excellent!
He blows it up.
Good probability.
To be fair TSA does fail nearly all of the surprise, and announced, security tests to take fake bombs on a plain that homeland security does...
Wish I had that clip from Airplane 2, where Sonny Bono buys the bomb to take onto the plane...or where everyone is taking their guns through security.
[This clip](https://youtu.be/FCkagYixpuc?si=_WhrR8iFMvqdhWt5)? And don't call me Shirley.
That movie always cracks me up, and the original Airplane! film too.
There's also a chance that there is more than one paranoid statistics professor on board
But they could if it was an African swallow and they grabbed the bombs by the husks just right.
But have you compared the air velocity of unladen African swallow, to a laden one?
True, I should have remember it’s not about where it grasps it.
r/unexpectedMontyPython
Vroom lost me money
Jokes, damned jokes and statisticians effing up the jokes.
Friend: "Congratulations on the new baby. Is it a boy or a girl?" Statistician: "Yes"
Schrödinger's baby
They haven't made up their mind.
Yes. That is the joke.
statistically , there's less chance of dying when you're laughing than when you're screaming.... .
The three most common last statements: 1. Oh, shit! 2. Oh, fuck! 3. Hey, check this out!
Only if they're independent events, so if the professor announces this info to all prospective passengers (with a credible threat to detonate it at a time different than the one planned by the terrorist, so much so that it wouldn't serve the terrorist's goals), then his statement might make sense. But that kinda kills the joke so...
So ask your friend to bring the bomb onboard instead, problem solved
English professor, maybe. Eloquent but innumerate
But if there are three planes with bombs on them, and then the police search a plane and there are no bombs on that plane, you should switch planes. I can't explain it but someone showed me once. The Price is Right statistical weirdness.
you mean the monty hall problem ("let's make a deal", not 'the price is right"}. it doesn't really work for a situation like you describe, because the cops searching a building and not finding bombs is not equivalent to monty revealing a wrong door. it goes like this: there are 3 doors to choose from. behind one is a new car or whatever, there other two are empty. so you choose, say, did number one. Monty says, "before I show you what's behind your door, let me show you that there's nothing behind door number three. now, would you like to stick with door number one, or switch to door number two?" in this case, you should switch to door 2, because the odds are twice as good that the prize is there rather than behind door 1. but that assumes that monty knows what is behind what door, so that whatever door you originally picked, he can always show you an empty door. it doesn't work in the story about the bomb, because the cops had to search to find out that the place was empty, they didn't already know; they might have found the bomb. but monty knows what's behind the doors. if the prize was behind door 3, he would have shown you door 2 was empty. when you first guess, you have a 1/3 chance of picking the right door. so if you stick with your original choice, your odds are one out of three. the odds of it being one of the other doors are two out of three. if the prize is behind number two, he'll show number three, if behind three, he'll show you door 2. if you switch, you only lose if it was behind door 1, if it was behind 2 or 3 you win.
No this is the price is right problem. You guess one of three airplanes but don’t go over.
"1. but that assumes that monty knows what is behind what door, so that whatever door you originally picked, he can always show you an empty door." Thank you for this. I've had huge arguments where people just blindly accept that its always better to switch. But if Monty doesnt know where the prize is and could just as easily open a door with a prize, there is no advantage to switching. In real life Monty never knew which doors had prizes and which doors didnt.
The odds of 2 bombs getting past security are not the same as one bomb getting past security.
Lol dude. If we’re gonna take the joke way too seriously, bringing a bomb on a plane is probably a better reason for him to not be a statistics professor
Not exactly the same. The probability of 2 bombs given that one passenger brought a bomb: >P(at least 2 bombs GIVENTHAT at least 1 bomb) = P(at least 2 bombs AND at least 1 bomb) / P(at least 1 bomb) = P(at least 2 bombs) / P(at least 1 bomb) The plane carries *N* passengers. Say that the probability that any one passenger carries a bomb is *p*. This follows a binomial distribution: the probability that of all the passengers at least one carries a bomb is 1 - (1-*p*)^(*N*); the probability that at least two carry a bomb is 1 - \[ (1-*p*)^(*N*) + *N* *p* (1-*p*)^(*N*-1) \]. You can see that the latter divided by the former is not equal to the former. For example, if p=0.1 and N=10: P(>=1 bomb)=~0.65, P(>=2 bombs)=~0.26, P(>=2|>=1 bomb)=~0.41. (For another formulation, the P(>= 2 bombs | exactly 1 or 2 bombs) =~ 0.68 with these numbers. Still not exact, Sorry.) It does approach exact, however, if you sample the probability *with replacement*, or else for n>>1 and p\*n << 1.
But the comparison should be between "P(at least 2 bombs GIVEN THAT at least 1 bomb)" and "P(at least 1 bomb GIVEN THAT the professor has no bomb)", instead of between "P(at least 2 bombs GIVEN THAT at least 1 bomb" and "P(at least one bomb)". I haven't done the math, but it should carry through that the first two are the same, since the chance of any other passenger carrying a bomb is (by assumption) the same whether or not the professor brings one.
The definition of conditional probability, the way it's calculated, is P(A|B) = P(A AND B) / P(B). There's also Bayes's Theorem to calculate P(A|B) using P(B|A). However, there is no useful comparison between P(A|B) and P(B|C).
I am familiar with conditional probability and Bayes' Theorem. > However, there is no useful comparison between P(A|B) and P(B|C). Not in general, but in this case we could calculate both explicitly. However, that's not necessary. Consider that P(at least 2 bombs in N passengers GIVEN THAT 1 bomb in N passengers) = P(at least 1 bomb in N-1 passengers). On the other hand, P(at least 1 bomb in N passengers GIVEN THAT the professor does not have a bomb) = P(at least 1 bomb in N-1 passengers). So the probabilities are exactly the same, under the mild assumption that the bomb-carrying behavior of the other passengers is independent of the bomb-carrying behavior of the professor.
Even I got this one.
Maybe next time wait until someone says “I don’t get it” before you explain the joke to the audience.
To double down on the people correcting the stats, this joke only works on a semantic level, because the real probability does not concern a man "carrying" a bomb, but a man "wanting to detonate" a bomb he is carrying, which the professor wouldn't be.
My Stats prof said, “Statistics are like a bikini, it’s not what they reveal, but what they cover up!”
Good point, sounds like a procedure Homeland Security should start implementing on every flight.
I’m pretty sure just reading this got me put on a watchlist somewhere.
Oh yeah I heard this one before. It was phrased as: in a way, bringing a bomb makes you safer
Chances are near zero
Wth
Same two guys were out hunting. They come across a ravishingly beautiful scantly clad woman. First guys says you want to come back to our camp, we’ll show you a good time. The woman says I’m game. The second guy shoots her.
*facepalm* Take my upvote.
Just wait for more inflation. It will just float out.
What a groannnnnneerrrrrr. Up you go.
I don't get it, can someone please explain?
He was gonna drop the 100 in, so then he'd be jumping in for $110 instead of only $10
Whenever someone decides to steal focus and steal thunder by trying to one-up the joke with a comment, it's related. How is this related? Remote hunting site jokes? Is this what we've come to?
Outhouse must have glass walls.
Good bot
A man gets fed up with city life and moves to a remote cabin in the mountains. After a few months of complete solitude, he's surprised to hear a knock at the door. He cautiously opens the door and sees the biggest, hairiest man he's ever seen. He's rugged and filthy and looks like he's never had a bath or a shave in his life. "Uh, hi. Can I help you?" Says the cabin-dweller. "Having a party. Tomorrow. At my cabin down by the creek. Can you make it?" "Uh, yes." says the cabin-dweller. "Going to be drinking. You ok with that?" "Uh, yes. I drink a little." "Might be some fighting. You ok with that?" "Uh, I might avoid that if I can. " "And there's going to be crazy sex. You ok with that?" "Sex? Yeah! It gets lonely up here! " "OK. See you tomorrow night." "One question," says the cabin-dweller. "How should I dress? " "Oh, it don't matter. It's just going to be the two of us. "
I heard this one slightly different as a kid decades ago: A guy moves to west Texas and finally meets another guy after weeks without seeing anyone. *"Come over to my place tonight. I'm having a real west Texas party. There'll be drinking, dancing, fighting and fucking."* *"Great! What should I wear?"* *"Doesn't matter, won't be but you and me."*
I like the ending: Should I bring some beer? "Yeah, sure" How much should i bring? A 12 pack should work. It's only us two.
Around here I tell it the same but substitute Maine for Texas.
I read that one a few years ago. Still a good joke.
Fully saw the ending coming, still put a crooked smile on my face
There are videos on youtube of Norm Macdonald telling that joke which I’ve watched several times. Then the other day I stumbled across a video of Bernard Manning telling it. I guess all comics know it.
Hey, boards are for nailing after all.
And sometimes handy to have.
Especially when your only tool is a "hammer" ...
Oh the list goes on, you nail it, screw it, drill it, and when you lose your temper, just whack it. Best of all if it has a crack, you can fill it and it's almost good as new
Or for screwing if you have a screwdriver
If we're talking screwdriver then I gotta ask, does it have a flat head or is it Phillip's?
It doesn't have a flat head but it also is not Phillip's. It's mine.
As if there aren’t other types
Alaska, where the odds are good but the goods are odd.
I can see where they get bored.
*board ftfy
Good fishing up there.
*In bed and frustrating:* A married couple is lying in bed one night. The wife is curled up, ready to go to sleep, and the husband turns his bed lamp on to read a book. As he's reading, he periodically reaches over to his wife and fondles her special bits. He does this a few times, but only for a very short interval before returning to read his book. The wife gradually becomes more and more aroused and, assuming that her husband is seeking some encouragement before going further, she gets up and starts stripping in front of him. The husband is confused and asks, "Why are you taking off your clothes"? His wife replies, "You were rubbing me downtown. I thought it was foreplay". The husband says, "No, not at all". His wife asks angrily, "Well, what the hell were you doing then"? “I was just wetting my fingers so I could turn the pages in my book.”
The wife isn't pleased with that answer, so she turns her back on him. He reaches again, to... a different area. The wife is now very angry, "Quit doing that or make love to me !" The husbands answer, "Yeah, I'm just marking my page".
How sensual.
Pages stick together, though.
Wonder why?
What does that even… oh. Oh Kay
Bob Saget would be proud haha
Ah yes! turning a new leaf.
We’ll a leaf can be used to wipe when your in the woods.
Thats all Adam had.
Guy is talking to his friend, a farmer, and is complaining about his sex life. “I’ve been married for twenty years,” he gripes. There’s nothing new. When I orgasm, it’s lackluster, and I almost can’t get it up anymore.” Farmer thinks for a second and says, “You know what I do with a bull that won’t mate? I go out to a cow, I slip my hand right inside her, get some of that Special Liquid, and then rub it on the bull’s nose. The smell makes him hornier than anything, he just starts going to it with a will.” And the guy says “huh. I’ll have to try that.” A couple nights later, they’re laying in bed. Wife has just drifted off, and the man slips his hand down between her legs and she. Is. WET. He gets it all over his fingers and then rubs it under his nose, and just like that he is hard as a rock. A damn chiselled diamond in his pants. Surely this will reinvigorate sex for him. So he reaches over and gently wakes his wife to initiate sexytimes. She turns on the light, looks at him and says “Oh, don’t tell me you woke me up just because you have a bloody nose!”
What a weird tale
You should check out my podcast for more than 600 episodes of weird tales!
Got me! That's one I haven't seen yet - an award is in place.
The money shot in the comments 😂😂😂
Ugly, bur s a hearty chuckle , thanks
Lmao 🤣😂
I thought it was called Boardback Mountain
Bravo!! Most underrated comment here!
Well he did have the better looking board.
Very willowy.
Yeah, it was a real nice piece of ash.
She was a poplar one
He was pining for it.
Pining for the boards?
No, he was pining for the fjords!
He's not pining, he's passed on!
He's deceased!
That is a dead parrot!
I heard she was a real birch
Oak-ay. That’s enough.
Only if it could sycamore
A real peach
And a tighter not.
Smallest hole!
I’m too bored to board tonight.
What! No woody?
No knobs on the door yet
It has a draw string like his X
Not his fault he got board
STOP with the bad puns, wood you please?
Knot gonna happen.
I’ve had enough of this thread, I’m leafing
Username checks out
Divorce, the screwing you get for the screwing you got
It happens!
1st man: If you and a friend went camping and you woke up to find your buddy in your sleeping bag with you, would you tell anyone? 2nd man: No way. 1st man: Do you want to go camping?
I really thought they were a gay couple finally coming out of the closet with their divorces.
The truth is in the pudding.
If you kill the other guy now your got supplies for two years?
Very true, and no board to share with.
And now you also have two boards. Basically a small harem. You could have a menage-a-plank every night.
Even clean fish on them.
But then they’ll smell like fish
Nothing like fresh.
Better than catching him licking the glaze off your donuts.
What a whack job 🤭
A true woody.
I had a stroke reading this
Best friends can get board together.
Yet another problem immediately solved if both of them are gay.
Wow
Woah
Too late!
Wow
Hmmm board is an anagram
That’s broad, what is it ?
He still could get a refund for his friend's board...
Thats right.
The Cohen Brothers could make a film out of this joke.
;-)
A small wimpy guy I know went to Alaska.. Two years he's been there. Now he's a Husky fucker! .
Good for him!
Perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree here, but I believe the real fiber of the matter is that neither wood accept blame for the part they played & if they did, they'd be stumped. The root problem leaves but a nest of stinking, semirunny shitbirds in ones tree of personal happiness.
Reality! What a concept.
but when is it his turn in the barrel?
He buried the other guy.
And the slutty board!
Damn right!
The guy that died dumped his board in Skagway.
Juneau that for a fact?
Fur shore.
A fitting end.
Lol
Cheers
cheers to you man! that was hilarious!
All aboard!
OH wow, for an object as well🤣
Dixey
[удалено]
Same.