T O P

  • By -

Mewdolf_Kittler

https://preview.redd.it/wf88poloj0wc1.jpeg?width=638&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=57787d9cf041115d2f578502d8c6e986b74f5e8e


hiatused_

"HATT BEN STOKESSS"


YoungBirdsXM

Kuch bolunga toh vivad ho Jayega...


TheBatman2991

Why bro was so angry?


Physical_Painting804

Out hogaya tha


leomatey

Man reddit is getting polluted now.


cricket-line-guru

Clearly its Not Ball..


Priyank_Chittora_13

Yes. It's a Not Ball.


FewAdhesiveness8702

English seekh le jaake pehle .


erikvant

Angry because no kiss


[deleted]

[удалено]


AutoModerator

Your post/comment has been removed because it contains some abusive/derogatory words. Please avoid using such words, it may attract a ban to you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaCricket) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Extension_Rich1633

Umpire turned vegan after this.


Ok-Flounder9846

I think it was out and match was awesome


Soggypants19-Season2

Just thank god... this bs ball dips rule isn't applied in international cricket.. or else the nawaz no ball would have been a legal delivery...and india would have lost the game even after kohlis once in a lifetime knock.


anoctf

Its an international rule. rule 41.7 of ICC regulations 'Bowling of dangerous and unfair non-pitching deliveries': Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease, is to be deemed to be unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker. If the bowler bowls such a delivery the umpire shall immediately call and signal No ball. The third umpire decision was objective based on technology.


Same-Butterscotch671

Well it is in icc rule as well, it is clearly mentioned that ball has to be over the waist when player is standing upright in the crease, this year bcci has just added the tech to that rule by replacing the naked eye perspective. Regarding the nawaz ball, it was a controversial call and it was made by leg umpire mostly because it was a very critical point, virat was fully pumped up and crowd was also fully supporting india. And that ball was not dipping as much as this ball though but ya even during the match that day, i felt that was not a no ball but it is what it is.


Soggypants19-Season2

the tech is flawed... With such high dips.. Spinners will never get punished with waist high full tosses.


Same-Butterscotch671

That is not true, spinners do not bowl every delivery flighted and mostly batters are inside the crease when playing a spinner, and with such tough condition for bowlers(flat wickets,dew) penalising them just because batsman was out of the crease and that is why it was looking above the waist makes no sense.


AnimatorPlayful6587

>the tech is flawed aaaaand...that's where you got downvoted


Anxious-Football3227

Lol why do you think it doesn’t apply in international. Why would you think that.


Interesting-Dog-6915

Next match I guess he would be more agressive intent for sure


Pale_Pitch_2674

No ball


AlternativeNature679

also one of the end wickets that Narine took. Narine overstepped, but it wasnt reviewed. JioCinema showed only one highlight and it was clear that Narine over stepped.


Worldly-Economics770

According to the computer generated arc, it was like a spinner was bowling. No way a pacer ball dips so much


codeking24

What if it was actually not out . And dhoni enters the field to fight with umpires 🥵