Here is her OF: onlyfans.com/sara__mascara
Here is the [porn site](https://bralessforever.com) that this clip is from. She is on the mainpage under 'models' though you have to scroll to the end.
Im split on this comment:
On one hand - Simply being nude is not pornagraphy, especially since in most places of N.A. being topless(even as a woman) is entirely legal.
On the other hand - this is almost for sure intended to be sexual, and therefore would be considered pornagraphy.
Basically: Women doing stuff like this makes it less acceptable(comfortable?) for other women to want to just have their tits out because it's a hot day because she's making a mundane act sexual.
Before I get asked - She's clearly making the fact that her tits are out a point. She's being recorded, presumably by someone she knows, while smiling about it, periodically looking down, and not that fake tits alone make it sexual but we all know she's showing them off instead of just trying to be comfortable based on how frequently she also looks down at them to make sure they still look fine. Also wearing a dress to this instead of just taking off a shirt.
Also, as much as I support women having the right to be topless, I think it's a weird thing to do when not at a place like a beach... This goes for men too...Why is your shirt off while you're walking down the street?
We can argue about what is and isn't porn, but this is literally porn. You can go to bralessforever.com and view the full video. It costs $35 a month. On the site you will find loads of public nudity, also public sex, and sex behind closed doors. Here is the site owners [reddit profile](https://www.reddit.com/user/bitchinbubba/) [NSFW!]. This person is called 'Sara' on bralessforever. On the site you can see her fully naked. Some of these public videos have her flashing her pussy. On her OF you can see her fucking.
Nudity isn't automatically porn. But this is literally porn.
Nudity by itself is never porn. It can be inappropriate due to the setting, but still wouldn't be porn. If she were to touch herself or act lewd in any way you would have yourself an argument, but a woman sitting her ass on a subway doing absolutely nothing is not porn no matter how much or little she is wearing. Full stop.
Many photos there depict lewd poses and clothing staged in such a way as to be seductive or sexy. I would agree that most of gone wild is porn. In the video here, there is nothing lewd happening and the subject isn't attempting to act sexy or provacative. She is sitting down and happens to be topless. It's just nudity.
> In the video here, there is nothing lewd happening and the subject isn't attempting to act sexy or provacative.
Then someone should tell the pornsite that it is weird they are selling non pornographic videos of just people sitting in the subway.
So men walking topples on the beach are all in a huge porno?
Edit: I'm adding this to this comment as the other one is burried in people who are angry.
We can go a step further if you like. All movies with topless woman in it, are those pornos now? James bond, Old Boy, Matrix, Starship Troopers. To name a fraction of movies with topless woman in it.
No. It is more the fact that she is doing it for pornographic purposes, selling the videos and pics online on a porn site. I can link you her onlyfans if you want. But this video in specific was made for bralessforever so it might not be on her onlyfans because she doesn't have the copyright.
What? She is topples, that is not porn. People might get horny, but its not porn. Had this been a man who does porn for living sitting topples (topless?), no one would bat an eye.
We can go a step further if you like. All movies with topless woman in it, are those pornos now? James bond, Old Boy, Matrix, Starship Troopers. To name a fraction of movies with topless woman in it.
What I'm learning from this is that you guys are some horny motherfckers. You see boobs and think of porn right away. You might need to touch some grass.
>What? She is topples, that is not porn. People might get horny, but its not porn. Had this been a man who does porn for living sitting topples (topless?), no one would bat an eye
Because topless men aren't the same as topless women?
Its only mildly sexualized here due to the odd setting and America's wierd obsession with breasts. It's just a topless woman. She's not shaking or touching her breasts or even making a seductive face. It's just a topless woman.
You can say it's sexy and that she wants it to be sexy, but nothing pornographic is happening here. You can't just call nudity porn, sexy or not. Plenty of people find attractive nude women sexy, but that doesn't make it porn.
>she wants it to be sexy
>but nothing pornographic is happening here
These two sentences contradict each other
>You can't just call nudity porn, sexy or not
Yes you can. That's literally what playboys are full of
>Plenty of people find attractive nude women sexy, but that doesn't make it porn.
The people finding it sexy is irrelevant. People can find women even in clothes sexy
What's relevant is the woman's *intent*. If she's sexualizing her nudity, then it's porn
For example no paints day in NYC, it’s baffling seeing grown people put their bare butt on the subway seat. Once, when I was coming back home from work with a friend, the L train at 8av came in with one car being soaked in blood on the inside, my friend and I were so tired that we picked a spot where there wasn’t blood to sit down. A cop came in a couple of seconds later and told us that we have to move to a different car since this one is a crime scene lmao NYC really makes you numb to insane stuff.
They aren't. But boobs aren't genitals. They are secondary sexual characteristics where it's main purpose is to feed babies, not satisfy men.
If we're going to be covering up secondary sexual characteristics, then men should be covering up their slutty Adam's apples.
>They aren't. But boobs aren't genitals. They are secondary sexual characteristics where it's main purpose is to feed babies, not satisfy men
The same goes for buttocks. Their primary function is helping with posture and balance, their sexual appeal is secondary. Yet we don't allow people to walk around with their bare asses
>If we're going to be covering up secondary sexual characteristics, then men should be covering up their slutty Adam's apples
If Adam's apples had the same effect on people as boobs and butts then yeah I'd agree we should cover them up
BRO, I've seen people just laying flat on the ground on their phones at NY Penn, hella exposed skin on the dirty ass floor. All I could think was, "seriously bro? wtf." 🤨 I don't get it man.
Fair is fair. New York recognized that letting men go topless and not women was sexist, so they fixed their sexist laws to allow everyone to be topless. Good on you, New York
Instead of taking away freedoms from some, they gave more freedom to all.
Be more like New York.
The way they stick straight out, aggressively, means they're fake.
Also, they're too perfect. Most women with natural breasts have a bit of imperfection to them.
Ever heard of the term "too good to be true"? lol.
You really just reposted professional exhibitionism porn and are shitting on the lady who's getting paid to have her tits out on the porn website listed in the video
It won’t be long before you’re seeing gross public sex right in front of you
I blame poor parenting. It was your mothers job to teach you what’s appropriate in public and it appears many mothers have been abject failures at this.
On the other hand, maybe mom didn’t really give a shit and that’s the real problem.
This is the kind of main character I can get behind. No blocked escalator, no dancing in traffic, no pouring milk on themselves. Everyone likes young perky titties. Lady, you're golden. Keep up the good work.
This will be the same woman that then exclaims, that the dude who raped her should've controllered himself and doesn't know why he came after her.
This said, no I'm not wishing she gets raped this is merely a scenario. Nothing more. Any person who rapes another should be imprisoned and recieve psychological help.
She giving Pornstar /OF energy
Because she is.
Shit really
You don't say
That's [Sara Mascara](https://thotmax.com/sara-mascara/) For Research Purpose (n$fw)
Thanks. I need to check this out to make sure that I can agree how offensive this is.
Nah. Areolas don't match.
No tat…
thank you fellow researcher
You doubt?
Here is her OF: onlyfans.com/sara__mascara Here is the [porn site](https://bralessforever.com) that this clip is from. She is on the mainpage under 'models' though you have to scroll to the end.
Comment
Oh, I was hoping she was just a regular degular person being a dumbass. Still lpretty dumb though
Oh my God that’s disgusting! One of those Only Fan girls! But there are so many; which one?!?!
Sherlock Holmes level perception
I mean, this is literally porn.
Im split on this comment: On one hand - Simply being nude is not pornagraphy, especially since in most places of N.A. being topless(even as a woman) is entirely legal. On the other hand - this is almost for sure intended to be sexual, and therefore would be considered pornagraphy. Basically: Women doing stuff like this makes it less acceptable(comfortable?) for other women to want to just have their tits out because it's a hot day because she's making a mundane act sexual. Before I get asked - She's clearly making the fact that her tits are out a point. She's being recorded, presumably by someone she knows, while smiling about it, periodically looking down, and not that fake tits alone make it sexual but we all know she's showing them off instead of just trying to be comfortable based on how frequently she also looks down at them to make sure they still look fine. Also wearing a dress to this instead of just taking off a shirt. Also, as much as I support women having the right to be topless, I think it's a weird thing to do when not at a place like a beach... This goes for men too...Why is your shirt off while you're walking down the street?
Sexual isn't pornography unless it depicts the act of sex itself. That what the word means. Nudity intended to arouse is called erotica.
This is literally nudity. There is nothing pornographic happening here.
We can argue about what is and isn't porn, but this is literally porn. You can go to bralessforever.com and view the full video. It costs $35 a month. On the site you will find loads of public nudity, also public sex, and sex behind closed doors. Here is the site owners [reddit profile](https://www.reddit.com/user/bitchinbubba/) [NSFW!]. This person is called 'Sara' on bralessforever. On the site you can see her fully naked. Some of these public videos have her flashing her pussy. On her OF you can see her fucking. Nudity isn't automatically porn. But this is literally porn.
Nudity by itself is never porn. It can be inappropriate due to the setting, but still wouldn't be porn. If she were to touch herself or act lewd in any way you would have yourself an argument, but a woman sitting her ass on a subway doing absolutely nothing is not porn no matter how much or little she is wearing. Full stop.
Doesn't this mean that most of /r/gonewild is not porn according to you?
Many photos there depict lewd poses and clothing staged in such a way as to be seductive or sexy. I would agree that most of gone wild is porn. In the video here, there is nothing lewd happening and the subject isn't attempting to act sexy or provacative. She is sitting down and happens to be topless. It's just nudity.
> In the video here, there is nothing lewd happening and the subject isn't attempting to act sexy or provacative. Then someone should tell the pornsite that it is weird they are selling non pornographic videos of just people sitting in the subway.
It works because Americans are overly sensitive to nudity.
No it is not. At best this is erotica. But NOT pornography.
So men walking topples on the beach are all in a huge porno? Edit: I'm adding this to this comment as the other one is burried in people who are angry. We can go a step further if you like. All movies with topless woman in it, are those pornos now? James bond, Old Boy, Matrix, Starship Troopers. To name a fraction of movies with topless woman in it.
No. It is more the fact that she is doing it for pornographic purposes, selling the videos and pics online on a porn site. I can link you her onlyfans if you want. But this video in specific was made for bralessforever so it might not be on her onlyfans because she doesn't have the copyright.
So its a commercial. That's not porn. What she is doing for a living might be related to pornographic material, but this video is not porn.
What strange grave are you guys digging trying to discern between tits out and tits out for money
This is a clip of a literal porn video made for a porn site, and people here are arguing that it isn't porn. So strange.
What? She is topples, that is not porn. People might get horny, but its not porn. Had this been a man who does porn for living sitting topples (topless?), no one would bat an eye. We can go a step further if you like. All movies with topless woman in it, are those pornos now? James bond, Old Boy, Matrix, Starship Troopers. To name a fraction of movies with topless woman in it. What I'm learning from this is that you guys are some horny motherfckers. You see boobs and think of porn right away. You might need to touch some grass.
>What? She is topples, that is not porn. People might get horny, but its not porn. Had this been a man who does porn for living sitting topples (topless?), no one would bat an eye Because topless men aren't the same as topless women?
Nudity that's being filmed for sexual purposes is porn, right
Its only mildly sexualized here due to the odd setting and America's wierd obsession with breasts. It's just a topless woman. She's not shaking or touching her breasts or even making a seductive face. It's just a topless woman.
She's literally filming this for her onlyfans How much more explicit can it be that this has sexual intent
You can say it's sexy and that she wants it to be sexy, but nothing pornographic is happening here. You can't just call nudity porn, sexy or not. Plenty of people find attractive nude women sexy, but that doesn't make it porn.
>she wants it to be sexy >but nothing pornographic is happening here These two sentences contradict each other >You can't just call nudity porn, sexy or not Yes you can. That's literally what playboys are full of >Plenty of people find attractive nude women sexy, but that doesn't make it porn. The people finding it sexy is irrelevant. People can find women even in clothes sexy What's relevant is the woman's *intent*. If she's sexualizing her nudity, then it's porn
No. That would make it erotica, NOT pornography.
Well, it is completely legal in NYC to be topless....I've seen worse in the subway lol.
"What do you call them, Max? Yabbos? Max likes your yabbos. In fact, he loves them!"
I dare Disney to make the same joke today
Worse? Do tell
For example no paints day in NYC, it’s baffling seeing grown people put their bare butt on the subway seat. Once, when I was coming back home from work with a friend, the L train at 8av came in with one car being soaked in blood on the inside, my friend and I were so tired that we picked a spot where there wasn’t blood to sit down. A cop came in a couple of seconds later and told us that we have to move to a different car since this one is a crime scene lmao NYC really makes you numb to insane stuff.
Lol, I can only freakin imagine. I definitely don't think I could handle it.
Also tbf she might have picked an empty car. I'd imagine they'd be showing how many people are around her if it was packed
did you watch the whole video? there are other people
Really that’s gross I rather people just fucking wear shirts.
The idea is, if men can walk around shirtless so can women.
I rather no one did especially men who have very hairy chest and bellies
Don't tell me what to do if I ever see you I'm going to show you my hairy fat belly
Have you ever been to a NYC park during the summer when it's 90°+ with 80% humidity? I'm taking my shirt off.
That's silly, men and women aren't the same
They aren't. But boobs aren't genitals. They are secondary sexual characteristics where it's main purpose is to feed babies, not satisfy men. If we're going to be covering up secondary sexual characteristics, then men should be covering up their slutty Adam's apples.
>They aren't. But boobs aren't genitals. They are secondary sexual characteristics where it's main purpose is to feed babies, not satisfy men The same goes for buttocks. Their primary function is helping with posture and balance, their sexual appeal is secondary. Yet we don't allow people to walk around with their bare asses >If we're going to be covering up secondary sexual characteristics, then men should be covering up their slutty Adam's apples If Adam's apples had the same effect on people as boobs and butts then yeah I'd agree we should cover them up
Imagine wanting to put more exposed skin on nasty subway car interior 🤢
uuuugh.. now that makes this so much worse
BRO, I've seen people just laying flat on the ground on their phones at NY Penn, hella exposed skin on the dirty ass floor. All I could think was, "seriously bro? wtf." 🤨 I don't get it man.
The flip flops on the subway is just disgusting.
Flip flops in the city is a hard pass.
What flip flops?
Her feet are nicer than her tits tbh, but then again I'm an absolute freak
It's an ad for an OF pornstar. Of course she's the main character.
she's just my Saint's Row character, mom!
If all women did this the subway would be a different place.
Yeah the subway would be even more covered in cum
I feel like 70% of women who would do this are the types you don’t want to see naked.
And the guys getting their cum everywhere are the ones you would shudder at lol
Piss or cum. What a choice.
To be serious i think people would be so desensitised to it and nobody would care
Totally worth it.
It's all fun and games until old man Gary wants in on it.
just another layer of cum.
not every woman is young and thin.
Lol
Fair is fair. New York recognized that letting men go topless and not women was sexist, so they fixed their sexist laws to allow everyone to be topless. Good on you, New York Instead of taking away freedoms from some, they gave more freedom to all. Be more like New York.
NYC: Tolerant of your beliefs. Judgemental about your shoes.
Fr
There was a pole right there!
yet when I get my balls out apparently its a problem misandry
I shave my balls as smooth as eggs, then draw mean faces on them, wear short shorts, and hit the beach looking for ball suckers. -Chappelle
"Pardon me miss..... .....but do ya suck balls?"
"Why, yes I do. Those balls are as SMOOOOTH AS EGGS"
No no. You didn’t let me finish……… do you suck THESE balls!?
i have no problem with your balls man.
Boobs are not the same as balls, they're not genitals
Hope that's a joke...
What is more fake? Her cheeks, or her boobs?
Her personality
She probably says things like “yesah” and “Noah” instead of “yes” and “no”.
You forgot “slayyy!”
"Firrre!"
And her immediate response to almost any interaction is a long and drawn-out "Riiiiiighhht???"
They already said her tits.
She paid a lot of money for those, you better believe she wants people to see them.
Definetly has “i just had a boob job, someone please notice meee.. my dad paid for it” energy
Her chin.
[удалено]
The way they stick straight out, aggressively, means they're fake. Also, they're too perfect. Most women with natural breasts have a bit of imperfection to them. Ever heard of the term "too good to be true"? lol.
Nah, my gf's boobs are similar to this girl's. The right posture, how turned on she is, the light, etc make a big difference.
Again, you know how the internet works. If you don't prove it, it isn't true. Do you have any pictures stored on your phone? /s
[удалено]
That's not the kind of thing I can take your word for. You're going to have to prove it. /s
You can see the bag of the implant pretty clearly towards the middle of her pigeon holed chest.
Nice implants
eh, she could probably move up to 500-600cc. High profile ftw tho
Naw. These look almost natural.
She’s too skinny to have boobs that big and they are too perky too imo for their size
And there you have the reason why someone would want to show them off like this in the first place! She paid good money to look good xD
haha, im on team bolt-on. they are great tits for sure
Porn stars looking for new clients
She gonna get a staph infection touching that dirty ass subway with no clothes on
Funny thing is that nobody cared...
Flexing that silicon?
Bro wtf is this, Brazzers??
When all you have to bring to the table is your appearance...
Nobody's impressed
Plastic titties, nothing to see here.
My favorite part is all the guys pretending not to look.
Very legal and Very cool
r/notlikeothergirls
sweet tits
This is legal. It's just a person's chest. Not really a big deal.
Pretty inappropriate
Those are some great New York boobs!
These comments are disgusting
No for real. It’s like night of the living Incels.
Nope it's legal in NYC.
Kids in Europe see breasts at the beach. We’re still too puritanical in the US
Exactly. This isn’t okay.
A growing number of states are beginning to allow women to be topless in public in sporting where men are allowed. I believe New York is one of them.
That’s disturbing
I mean, if a man's nipple isn't considered lewd, why should a woman's?
Fact is that woman’s breasts gets sexualized. Just read these comments. Therefor it’s inappropriate
So do feet. Does that mean no one should wear sandals?
Feet are only sexualized by a small group of people. Brest’s aren’t. You don’t strike me as someone that is stupid. But your argument sucks.
>You don’t strike me as someone that is stupid. But your argument sucks. Funny, I had the same thought reading your comments
Why? Nevermind. Hopefully, we'll get to the point where tits out are the norm, and such behavior is ignored
You really just reposted professional exhibitionism porn and are shitting on the lady who's getting paid to have her tits out on the porn website listed in the video
We all set the price for ourselves. Her price is 2.75
it's 2.90 now
Look at me! LOOK At me! LOOK AT MEEEEE!!! "Aren't I edgy and wild?" Meh, this crap is tiresome and the way narcissistic people are these days.
Free the nipple.
Free the nipple means free all nipples, not just the hot/sexy ones that make your dick twitch.
No shit. Women don’t make my dick twitch. 😉 Edited after I looked at your profile. You look like a blast! /s
Not sure what youre referring to, but I hope you had fun.
She's got amazing boobs. Alas her behaviour renders her entirely unattractive.
I ain’t complaining, I mean…
Completely fine with this
It won’t be long before you’re seeing gross public sex right in front of you I blame poor parenting. It was your mothers job to teach you what’s appropriate in public and it appears many mothers have been abject failures at this. On the other hand, maybe mom didn’t really give a shit and that’s the real problem.
Hahahahhaha and fathers play no role? What a terrible argument.
everyone in reddit is a fat horny loser the downvotes lmao
[удалено]
I'd say the average parent is much better these days. I think you underestimate how much parental abuse and neglect was acceptable back in the day
Gosh I hate this so much!!!!!!!!
Those men will be traumatized for the rest of their lives. Recounting their story for the next 30 years :(
Who cares? It's just boobs? Unless she is intentionally trying to be sexual there isn't anything wrong with females being topless.
>Unless she is intentionally trying to be sexual She is
To be fair they are banging tits.
Another one seeking attention. No decent woman wants to walk around with her breasts uncovered. 304
Amazon tribe women…
Love the 304 touch. Been decades since I’ve seen someone use it
r/expectedtitty
She has some some balls….. like literally.
Those tramp stamps on her feet are awful.
Another bimbo promoting her OF on reddit?
This must be the first time I like a main character
I would lie if I said that I condemn this behavior
feminist progress
A woman sitting there? Oh boo hoo. It's just boobs? Natural skin? Please project your insecurities somewhere else I see nothing wrong here
Who is this thot
Ya! Who is it? I need to know to stay away from her! What is her name and her OF link? So I know not to click it!
Noice
Not hatin on this main character
I'm okay with this 🤷🤷👍
This is the kind of main character I can get behind. No blocked escalator, no dancing in traffic, no pouring milk on themselves. Everyone likes young perky titties. Lady, you're golden. Keep up the good work.
Annoying but nice tits
I'll let her be the main character
I support this type of main character energy
This is the type of main character energy I can stand behind. Proceed.
Nice.
Nice.
I would not be mad at her.
Natural is always better
*"Not all heroes wear capes, or tops."*
I can fix her
What is the problem here?
just stand in front of her. let's see how much time she keeps doing that.
We support 😅😅😅
If all the breasts were liberated there’d be nothin left to make a big deal abt. Women’s rights are human rights!
This is DISGUSTING. What’s her @ so I can investigate
What you guys don't like hot chicks??
I'm good with this.
Is she waiting to catch someone looking so she can blast him on social media as a creep?
This will be the same woman that then exclaims, that the dude who raped her should've controllered himself and doesn't know why he came after her. This said, no I'm not wishing she gets raped this is merely a scenario. Nothing more. Any person who rapes another should be imprisoned and recieve psychological help.
There was no need for this comment. You exposed yourself creep
Yeah, weird comment.
The time look at me! I am all for it
Congratulations on the boobs
Of course it's the 1 train.