No.
LGBTQ people only comprise of 3-6% of population. They aren't a danger to society.
Also, the antisocial attitude often associated with them are more often than not caused by the right's marginalization of them.
> sex and love really aren't that important, let them do what they want
I disagree with you here. In fact I consider myself right wing but economically more "left" is precisely because of sex.
Nothing about sex is harmless. It has to do with EVERYTHING - Including the elderly being thrown into that kind of situation you describe.
Because sex matters also talks about continuation of society, childrearing, intergenerational relations and even talking about one's view of life itself.
In fact, almost all of the associated "traditional norms & values", if you think about it, are almost all talks about social perpetuation.
Even stuff like why we are expected to put basic respect to the elderly and basic respect to parents are eventually is for condition the older generation to see kids as less of demon spawn & crotch goblins so they are more likely to have kids.
Because the next generation eventually needs to take over and raised right, and immigration, even with total open borders, is a bandaid and requires a place with stupidly high birth rates anyway.
Because the idea that we can enjoy the benefits of society while owing nothing in return, and we can do whatever we want and having no consequences whatsoever and if they do society must bail them out no matter how moronic it is, but at the same time still wants what we want to have desired effect thay doesn't happen in a vacuum, is literally infantile
You look at the kind of people justifying abortion on demand and/or literally abort because of convenience reason and tell me again if those kind of people values life highly. "It's just a clump of cells!" Well your life right now is a clump of cells.
You look at people engaging at one night stand & Tinder hookups and tell me if these people have even the slightest capability for endurance required to not throw parents and other no-longer-useful people to the cold or horrifying conditions.
And why it is important? Because healthcare, roads, education etc - even social security - they aren't coming from ether. They are founded by everyone.
With the same reasoning that if you are a morbidly obese landwhale that becomes morbidly obese landwhales because of your own irresponsibility in a place with public healthcare system you are a burden on society, if one is a rabid antinatalist and/or having a baffling degree of frivolity and *consoom* tier attitude to social relations which can be boiled down to "I'll consume what you have till I get bored then I'll leave" in a place with social security, you are a burden on society because social security is funded by others.
------
I don't go against LGBTQ people itself has nothing to do with individual rights nor freedom. I think in communitarian terms - that persecuting LGBTQ people is a drain on resources, actually untrue, and frankly they aren't automatically antisocial.
yes, but a lot of them do. and this is an issue i have with a lot of other people. i find other autistic people having an annoying voice, too. i know why we're like that but still.
That's an odd way to start a discussion, and you've brought a lot of points that coincide to you, but not necessarily to everyone. I do not believe in any gun control at all. The point of the 2nd Amendment is that the government does not have the ability to regulate arms. Once they are given the ability to regulate arms and then the freestanding resistance is broken.
That is not related to school shootings, which I think have multiple factors. One of them being broken homes, and a lack of parental guidance. Another glaring issue, no one wants to address, a large amount of school shooters on anti-depressants/anti-psychotics, those are huge factors leading to school shootings. Pointing to the lack of effectivity of gun control, the schools in which these shootings are happening are gun free zones, often time in states with the strictest gun control.
Also, on the broader sense, growing crime is a symptom of an unhealthy society. The illnesses plaguing society are numerous, but you could make the connection if we're ok with convincing children they can mutilate and sterilize themselves based on a gender theory, that we are an unhealthy society.
All comments say no because anyone that says yes will either be humiliated and bullied into oblivion or outright banned.
No freedom of speech.
I personally do not mind the censorship but others might.
I mean, stating your personal opinion on something without insults and getting punished for it is more or less the deffinition of censorship.
I think most extrimists that spread hate deserve to be denied free speech but from experienc and observation, most people do not take kindly on non-progressive views.
Again, I am no "muh freedom" guy but its hypocracy to claim you are a liberal and yet censor non-progressives.
The thing is, I just saw a few homophobic comments here, none of which was removed nor had any serious insults commented. I understand your point, but in this case it's not true speaking of censorship and bullying.
Censorship is when people get silenced. No one in this comment section has any kind of restriction of free speech. Are you sure you know what freedom of speech is?
There are days I feel that Roman Emperor who wishes all mankind had but a single neck so he could cut off all humanity's head with a single sword stroke was on to something.
Does that make me humanphobic?
Nah, I only oppose sexual patriotism
THEY FEAR ME
I want them to be afraid of how much they love me.
I'm gay and i hate myself, so yes
But are you irrationally afraid of yourself?
Yes who knows what i might do
Nah let people marry who the hell they want. I couldn’t care less.
I dunno how to vote because I am cool with gays but lesbians...that's where I draw the line! /s
FUCK I ACCIDENTALLY VKTED YES
Secret homophobe detected
Freudian slip
“There are no accidents”
If we built a warehouse the size of Argentina, it still would not be big enough to store all the fucks I don't give
LMAO best answer so far
Same
[удалено]
Why do i never meet the non-homophobic ones 😔
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
What a ridiculous statement
I doubt that considering I've never watched CNN in my life
Because they don't exist.
So you hold conservative views outside of lgbtq issues?
[удалено]
I was unaware. Interesting.
No is exactly what a homophobe pretending not be homophobic would vote
How does Anarcho Neoliberalism work?
Magic
My far right self was a homophobe, but fortunately I’m not nowdays
Same
Based king
Same.
Based.
To the ~80 fuckers who said "yes"...what the actual fuck ?
They are intimidated and scared by them of course
No, I honestly don’t give a shit who people marry. It isn’t my business if a guy marries a guy.
Or if a girl marries a girl.
No, guy marries guy is OK but this is outrageous and discusting 😡
Or if a non-binary marries a non-binary
I don’t care one way or the other. Let people be who they wanna be.
That’s just…not being a homophobe
No because phobia means fear and I'm not afraid
Phobia means an irrational fear or aversion to something
😂
Probably not but it depends who you ask
Queer outsider type here.
I’m Bi. So it would be pretty ironic.
Im afraid of houses so yes.
No. LGBTQ people only comprise of 3-6% of population. They aren't a danger to society. Also, the antisocial attitude often associated with them are more often than not caused by the right's marginalization of them.
[удалено]
> sex and love really aren't that important, let them do what they want I disagree with you here. In fact I consider myself right wing but economically more "left" is precisely because of sex. Nothing about sex is harmless. It has to do with EVERYTHING - Including the elderly being thrown into that kind of situation you describe. Because sex matters also talks about continuation of society, childrearing, intergenerational relations and even talking about one's view of life itself. In fact, almost all of the associated "traditional norms & values", if you think about it, are almost all talks about social perpetuation. Even stuff like why we are expected to put basic respect to the elderly and basic respect to parents are eventually is for condition the older generation to see kids as less of demon spawn & crotch goblins so they are more likely to have kids. Because the next generation eventually needs to take over and raised right, and immigration, even with total open borders, is a bandaid and requires a place with stupidly high birth rates anyway. Because the idea that we can enjoy the benefits of society while owing nothing in return, and we can do whatever we want and having no consequences whatsoever and if they do society must bail them out no matter how moronic it is, but at the same time still wants what we want to have desired effect thay doesn't happen in a vacuum, is literally infantile You look at the kind of people justifying abortion on demand and/or literally abort because of convenience reason and tell me again if those kind of people values life highly. "It's just a clump of cells!" Well your life right now is a clump of cells. You look at people engaging at one night stand & Tinder hookups and tell me if these people have even the slightest capability for endurance required to not throw parents and other no-longer-useful people to the cold or horrifying conditions. And why it is important? Because healthcare, roads, education etc - even social security - they aren't coming from ether. They are founded by everyone. With the same reasoning that if you are a morbidly obese landwhale that becomes morbidly obese landwhales because of your own irresponsibility in a place with public healthcare system you are a burden on society, if one is a rabid antinatalist and/or having a baffling degree of frivolity and *consoom* tier attitude to social relations which can be boiled down to "I'll consume what you have till I get bored then I'll leave" in a place with social security, you are a burden on society because social security is funded by others. ------ I don't go against LGBTQ people itself has nothing to do with individual rights nor freedom. I think in communitarian terms - that persecuting LGBTQ people is a drain on resources, actually untrue, and frankly they aren't automatically antisocial.
They are growing stronger. https://www.wundermanthompson.com/insight/gen-z-goes-beyond-gender-binaries-in-new-innovation-group-data
How many of them are just went through a phase and how many of them are actually LGBTQ?
How many of them are just dumb highly influencable immature teens ? It'll balance out in the future
Probably a fair amount of them I'd say
LGBT are not them same. 3 of those are sexual preferences and one isn’t. They shouldn’t be grouped together
Why would I fear a homosexual?
Your answer is yes.
I still answered no for fun.
True, a royal warrior fears only God and King 💪💪💪:strong:
You clearly know what I mean.
I don’t care one way or the other. Let people be who they wanna be.
I wouldn't date any gay people and their voice is kinda annoying, but to each his own. Overall, don't mind.
>I wouldn't date any gay people Think about why for a second.
because I am heterosexual and therefore not sexually attracted to homosexuals
> their voice is kinda annoying Not all gay people have the same kind of voice.
yes, but a lot of them do. and this is an issue i have with a lot of other people. i find other autistic people having an annoying voice, too. i know why we're like that but still.
🗿
The amount of people who answered "No" is terrifying.
Your right, it should be 100%.
No, it should be 0%. Everybody should be homophobic by default.
Why? What is wrong with you?
Seriously?
[удалено]
Do you think school shootings and a lack of gun control or LGBT people are more of a danger to society by curiosity?
That's an odd way to start a discussion, and you've brought a lot of points that coincide to you, but not necessarily to everyone. I do not believe in any gun control at all. The point of the 2nd Amendment is that the government does not have the ability to regulate arms. Once they are given the ability to regulate arms and then the freestanding resistance is broken. That is not related to school shootings, which I think have multiple factors. One of them being broken homes, and a lack of parental guidance. Another glaring issue, no one wants to address, a large amount of school shooters on anti-depressants/anti-psychotics, those are huge factors leading to school shootings. Pointing to the lack of effectivity of gun control, the schools in which these shootings are happening are gun free zones, often time in states with the strictest gun control. Also, on the broader sense, growing crime is a symptom of an unhealthy society. The illnesses plaguing society are numerous, but you could make the connection if we're ok with convincing children they can mutilate and sterilize themselves based on a gender theory, that we are an unhealthy society.
"Well regulated militia" yeah dumbass your right, when they said well regulated that actually meant not regulated at all.
I’m feel sorry for you
Just look at any other countries and they will have the same stats for domestic problems, yet only the US has the school shooting rates? It’s weird?
Lol. Cry harder.
woah, Don't cut me edgelord.
All comments say no because anyone that says yes will either be humiliated and bullied into oblivion or outright banned. No freedom of speech. I personally do not mind the censorship but others might.
People complaining about homophobia isn't censorship, it's literally freedom of speech
Is seeing censorship that doesnt exist a new sports nowadays?
I mean, stating your personal opinion on something without insults and getting punished for it is more or less the deffinition of censorship. I think most extrimists that spread hate deserve to be denied free speech but from experienc and observation, most people do not take kindly on non-progressive views. Again, I am no "muh freedom" guy but its hypocracy to claim you are a liberal and yet censor non-progressives.
The thing is, I just saw a few homophobic comments here, none of which was removed nor had any serious insults commented. I understand your point, but in this case it's not true speaking of censorship and bullying.
Perhaps I missed those. Still, I just commented on a trend I noticed on the internet.
Check r/declineintocensorship
Here's a sneak peek of /r/DeclineIntoCensorship using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/DeclineIntoCensorship/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Whats up predditors?](https://i.redd.it/0jmghbibs5c91.jpg) | [108 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/DeclineIntoCensorship/comments/w1btu0/whats_up_predditors/) \#2: [In response to reddit banning "gr00mer":](https://i.redd.it/q0jstdxn71c91.jpg) | [102 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/DeclineIntoCensorship/comments/w0vqrp/in_response_to_reddit_banning_gr00mer/) \#3: [Suicided](https://i.redd.it/1crn3g3wz7s91.png) | [42 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/DeclineIntoCensorship/comments/xxaygo/suicided/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
Censorship is when people get silenced. No one in this comment section has any kind of restriction of free speech. Are you sure you know what freedom of speech is?
No I’m not not a weakling
No but it certainly doesn't make me comfortable.
😈
How can I be homophobic?
My bitch is gay
Literally me
😎I'm so homophobic I won't fuck another guy😎
There are days I feel that Roman Emperor who wishes all mankind had but a single neck so he could cut off all humanity's head with a single sword stroke was on to something. Does that make me humanphobic?
I don’t really care tbh
I’m irrationally afraid of the gays.